Compare · ARMK vs SG
ARMK vs SG
Side-by-side comparison of Aramark (ARMK) and Sweetgreen Inc. (SG): market cap, price performance, sector, and recent activity on the wire.
Summary
- Both ARMK and SG operate in Restaurants (Consumer Discretionary), so they compete in similar markets.
- ARMK is the larger of the two at $14.92B, about 4.8x SG ($3.12B).
- ARMK has been more active in the news (4 items in the past 4 weeks vs 2 for SG).
- SG has more recent analyst coverage (25 ratings vs 23 for ARMK).
- Company
- Aramark
- Sweetgreen Inc.
- Price
- -
- -
- Market cap
- $14.92B
- $3.12B
- 1M return
- -
- -
- 1Y return
- -
- -
- Industry
- Restaurants
- Restaurants
- Exchange
- NYSE
- NASDAQ
- IPO
- 2013
- 2021
- News (4w)
- 4
- 2
- Recent ratings
- 23
- 25
Aramark
Aramark provides food, facilities, and uniform services to education, healthcare, business and industry, sports, leisure, and corrections clients in the United States and internationally. It operates through three segments: Food and Support Services United States, Food and Support Services International, and Uniform and Career Apparel. The company offers managed services, including dining, catering, food service management, and convenience-oriented retail services; non-clinical support services, such as patient food and nutrition, retail food, and procurement services; and plant operations and maintenance, custodial/housekeeping, energy management, grounds keeping, and capital project management services. It also provides on-site restaurants, catering, convenience stores, and executive dining services; beverage and vending services; and facility management services comprising landscaping, transportation, payment, and other facility consulting services relating to building operations. In addition, the company offers concessions, banquet, and catering services; retail services and merchandise sale, recreational, and lodging services; and facility management services at sports, entertainment, and recreational facilities. Further, the company offers correctional food; and operates commissaries, laundry facilities, and property rooms. Additionally, it provides design, sourcing and manufacturing, delivery, cleaning, maintenance, and marketing services for uniforms and accessories; provides managed restroom services; and rents uniforms, work clothing, outerwear, particulate-free garments, and non-garment items and related services that include mats, shop towels, and first aid supplies. The company was formerly known as ARAMARK Holdings Corporation and changed its name to Aramark in May 2014. Aramark was founded in 1959 and is based in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Latest ARMK
- Aramark to Host Conference Call on Third Quarter Fiscal 2026 Results
- Director Dreiling Richard W was granted 475 shares, increasing direct ownership by 3% to 15,009 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Creed Greg was granted 583 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.86% to 68,089 units (SEC Form 4)
- TIME Names Aramark Among America's Best Companies 2026
- Aramark Student Nutrition Announces Nationwide Update to School Menus for 2026–2027
- Director Wills Kevin was granted 37 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.17% to 21,940 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Sadove Stephen I was granted 199 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.19% to 102,507 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Lopez Patricia E was granted 65 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.22% to 29,142 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director King Karen Marie was granted 26 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.06% to 42,803 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Keverian Kenneth M was granted 65 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.22% to 29,142 units (SEC Form 4)
Latest SG
- Sweetgreen to Announce Second Quarter 2026 Results on August 6, 2026
- Sweetgreen Celebrates Peak Peach Season With New Limited-Time Alice Waters’ Peach & Goat Cheese Salad
- Sweetgreen Opens Its First-Ever Nashville Location in the Gulch
- Sweetgreen Inc. filed SEC Form 8-K: Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
- Director Singer Bradley E was granted 24,115 shares, increasing direct ownership by 16% to 176,922 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Moran Montgomery F was granted 24,115 shares, increasing direct ownership by 45% to 77,870 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Bornstein Julie was granted 24,115 shares, increasing direct ownership by 52% to 70,507 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Ostroff Dawn was granted 24,115 shares, increasing direct ownership by 175% to 37,870 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Burrows Clifford was granted 24,115 shares, increasing direct ownership by 20% to 144,435 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Blumenthal Neil Harris was granted 24,115 shares, increasing direct ownership by 24% to 123,287 units (SEC Form 4)