Compare · BHP vs BTU
BHP vs BTU
Side-by-side comparison of BHP Group Limited (BHP) and Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU): market cap, price performance, sector, and recent activity on the wire.
Summary
- Both BHP and BTU operate in Coal Mining (Energy), so they compete in similar markets.
- BHP is the larger of the two at $223.14B, about 73.9x BTU ($3.02B).
- BTU has been more active in the news (17 items in the past 4 weeks vs 3 for BHP).
- BHP has more recent analyst coverage (25 ratings vs 8 for BTU).
BHP Group Limited
BHP Group engages in the natural resources business in Australia, Europe, China, Japan, India, South Korea, rest of Asia, North America, South America, and internationally. It operates through Petroleum, Copper, Iron Ore, and Coal segments. The company engages in the exploration, development, and production of oil and gas properties; and mining of copper, silver, zinc, molybdenum, uranium, gold, iron ore, and metallurgical and energy coal. It is also involved in mining, smelting, and refining of nickel; the provision of towing, freight, marketing and trading, marketing support, finance, administrative, and other services; and potash development activities. The company was founded in 1851 and is headquartered in Melbourne, Australia.
Peabody Energy Corporation
Peabody Energy Corporation engages in coal mining business in the United States, Japan, Taiwan, Australia, China, India, Vietnam, South Korea, and internationally. The company operates through Seaborne Thermal Mining, Seaborne Metallurgical Mining, Powder River Basin Mining, and Other U.S. Thermal Mining segments. It is involved in mining, preparation, and sale of thermal coal primarily to electric utilities; mining bituminous and sub-bituminous coal deposits; and mining metallurgical coal, such as hard coking coal, semi-hard coking coal, semi-soft coking coal, and pulverized coal injection coal. The company supplies coal primarily to electricity generators, industrial facilities, and steel manufacturers. As of December 31, 2020, it owned interests in 17 coal mining operations located in the United States and Australia; and had approximately 3.0 billion tons of proven and probable coal reserves and approximately 450,000 acres of surface property through ownership and lease agreements. The company also engages in direct and brokered trading of coal and freight-related contracts, as well as provides transportation-related services, which involve financial derivative contracts and physical contracts. Peabody Energy Corporation was founded in 1883 and is headquartered in St. Louis, Missouri.
Latest BHP
- SEC Form 6-K filed by BHP Group Limited
- BHP Announces Rail Transportation Agreements with CN and CPKC to Bring Jansen Potash to Global Customers
- SEC Form 6-K filed by BHP Group Limited
- BHP Group downgraded by BofA Securities
- Critical Minerals Market Heats Up as Nickel and Cobalt Demand Surges Worldwide
- SEC Form 6-K filed by BHP Group Limited
- SEC Form 6-K filed by BHP Group Limited
- SEC Form 6-K filed by BHP Group Limited
- SEC Form 4 filed by Stone Emma Kate
- Amendment: SEC Form 3 filed by new insider Stone Emma Kate
Latest BTU
- Peabody Energy Corporation filed SEC Form 8-K: Regulation FD Disclosure
- Peabody Announces New Surety Arrangements in the U.S. and Australia
- Director Malone Robert A was granted 71 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.12% to 58,640 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Walker Clayton D. was granted 20 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.25% to 7,904 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Hodges Georganne was granted 21 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.26% to 8,042 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Chirekos Nicholas J. was granted 68 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.15% to 44,619 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Gorman Stephen E was granted 65 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.11% to 57,669 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Champion William H was granted 114 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.26% to 43,203 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Bertone Andrea E. was granted 137 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.29% to 47,048 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Banks Margaret Katherine was granted 59 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.26% to 22,469 units (SEC Form 4)