Compare · BIRD vs LULU
BIRD vs LULU
Side-by-side comparison of Allbirds Inc. (BIRD) and lululemon athletica inc. (LULU): market cap, price performance, sector, and recent activity on the wire.
Summary
- Both BIRD and LULU operate in Apparel (Consumer Discretionary), so they compete in similar markets.
- LULU is the larger of the two at $12.65B, about 544.2x BIRD ($23.2M).
- Over the past year, BIRD is down 74.6% and LULU is down 47.7% - LULU leads by 26.9 points.
- LULU has been more active in the news (15 items in the past 4 weeks vs 1 for BIRD).
- Both have 25 recent analyst ratings on file.
- Company
- Allbirds Inc.
- lululemon athletica inc.
- Price
- $2.64-2.40%
- $116.66+0.36%
- Market cap
- $23.2M
- $12.65B
- 1M return
- -52.00%
- +4.40%
- 1Y return
- -74.63%
- -47.72%
- Industry
- Apparel
- Apparel
- Exchange
- NASDAQ
- NASDAQ
- IPO
- 2021
- 2007
- News (4w)
- 1
- 15
- Recent ratings
- 25
- 25
Allbirds Inc.
Allbirds, Inc. manufactures and sells footwear and apparel products for men and women. It offers shoes, such as running shoes, everyday sneakers, high-tops, slip-ons, boat shoes, flats, weather repellent shoes, and sandals. The company's apparel products include activewear, tops, bottoms, dresses, sweaters, underwear, and socks. It sells its products through its retail stores in the United States and internationally, as well as online. Allbirds, Inc. was formerly known as Bozz, Inc. The company was incorporated in 2015 and is based in San Francisco, California.
lululemon athletica inc.
lululemon athletica inc., together with its subsidiaries, designs, distributes, and retails athletic apparel and accessories for women and men. It operates through two segments, Company-Operated Stores and Direct to Consumer. The company offers pants, shorts, tops, and jackets for healthy lifestyle and athletic activities, such as yoga, running, and training, as well as other sweaty pursuits. It also provides fitness-related accessories. The company sells its products through a chain of company-operated stores; outlets and warehouse sales; a network of wholesale accounts, such as yoga studios, health clubs, and fitness centers; temporary locations, including seasonal stores; and license and supply arrangements, as well as directly to consumer through mobile apps, and lululemon.com e-commerce website. As of January 31, 2021, it operated 521 company-operated stores under the lululemon brand in the United States, Canada, the People's Republic of China, Australia, the United Kingdom, Japan, New Zealand, Germany, South Korea, Singapore, France, Malaysia, Sweden, Ireland, the Netherlands, Norway, and Switzerland. lululemon athletica inc. was founded in 1998 and is based in Vancouver, Canada.
Latest BIRD
- Allbirds Inc. filed SEC Form 8-K: Leadership Update
- Chief Executive Officer Carlsten Nadia Catherine sold $494,632 worth of shares (117,459 units at $4.21), decreasing direct ownership by 8% to 1,414,920 units (SEC Form 4) (for tax liability)
- Chief Financial Officer Mitchell Ann was granted 766,190 shares, increasing direct ownership by 1,006% to 842,378 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Hughes Lily Yan was granted 125,000 shares, increasing direct ownership by 563% to 147,222 units (SEC Form 4)
- Chief Executive Officer Carlsten Nadia Catherine was granted 1,532,379 shares (SEC Form 4)
- SEC Form 3 filed by new insider Carlsten Nadia Catherine
- Allbirds Inc. filed SEC Form 8-K: Regulation FD Disclosure
- Smartbird Appoints New CEO to Advance AI Infrastructure Strategy
- Allbirds Announces Record Date for the Asset Sale Dividend
- Allbirds Inc. filed SEC Form 8-K: Completion of Acquisition or Disposition of Assets, Other Events, Financial Statements and Exhibits
Latest LULU
- lululemon athletica downgraded by Truist with a new price target
- SEC Form S-8 filed by lululemon athletica inc.
- Director Maurer Marc was granted 1,606 shares (SEC Form 4)
- Director Gentile Laura was granted 1,606 shares, increasing direct ownership by 161% to 2,606 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Mahe Isabel was granted 1,606 shares, increasing direct ownership by 64% to 4,125 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Mcneill Jon was granted 1,606 shares, increasing direct ownership by 17% to 10,928 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Bracey Esi Eggleston was granted 1,606 shares, increasing direct ownership by 650% to 1,853 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Henry Kathryn was granted 1,606 shares, increasing direct ownership by 29% to 7,122 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Bergh Charles V was granted 1,606 shares, increasing direct ownership by 590% to 1,878 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director List Teri was granted 1,606 shares, increasing direct ownership by 130% to 2,839 units (SEC Form 4)