Compare · BBL vs BTU
BBL vs BTU
Side-by-side comparison of BHP Group PlcSponsored ADR (BBL) and Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU): market cap, price performance, sector, and recent activity on the wire.
Summary
- Both BBL and BTU operate in Coal Mining (Energy), so they compete in similar markets.
- BBL is the larger of the two at $161.42B, about 56.1x BTU ($2.88B).
- BTU has hit the wire 3 times in the past 4 weeks while BBL has been quiet.
- BTU has more recent analyst coverage (8 ratings vs 2 for BBL).
BHP Group PlcSponsored ADR
BHP Group engages in the natural resources business in Australia, Europe, China, Japan, India, South Korea, rest of Asia, North America, South America, and internationally. It operates through Petroleum, Copper, Iron Ore, and Coal segments. The company engages in the exploration, development, and production of oil and gas properties; and mining of copper, silver, zinc, molybdenum, uranium, gold, iron ore, and metallurgical and energy coal. It is also involved in mining, smelting, and refining of nickel; the provision of towing, freight, marketing and trading, marketing support, finance, administrative, and other services; and potash development activities. The company was founded in 1851 and is headquartered in Melbourne, Australia.
Peabody Energy Corporation
Peabody Energy Corporation engages in coal mining business in the United States, Japan, Taiwan, Australia, China, India, Vietnam, South Korea, and internationally. The company operates through Seaborne Thermal Mining, Seaborne Metallurgical Mining, Powder River Basin Mining, and Other U.S. Thermal Mining segments. It is involved in mining, preparation, and sale of thermal coal primarily to electric utilities; mining bituminous and sub-bituminous coal deposits; and mining metallurgical coal, such as hard coking coal, semi-hard coking coal, semi-soft coking coal, and pulverized coal injection coal. The company supplies coal primarily to electricity generators, industrial facilities, and steel manufacturers. As of December 31, 2020, it owned interests in 17 coal mining operations located in the United States and Australia; and had approximately 3.0 billion tons of proven and probable coal reserves and approximately 450,000 acres of surface property through ownership and lease agreements. The company also engages in direct and brokered trading of coal and freight-related contracts, as well as provides transportation-related services, which involve financial derivative contracts and physical contracts. Peabody Energy Corporation was founded in 1883 and is headquartered in St. Louis, Missouri.
Latest BBL
- SEC Form 6-K filed by BHP Group PlcSponsored ADR
- SEC Form SC 13G/A filed by BHP Group PlcSponsored ADR (Amendment)
- Shares of iron ore companies are trading higher amid a rise in iron ore prices.
- SEC Form 6-K filed by BHP Group PlcSponsored ADR
- SEC Form 6-K filed by BHP Group PlcSponsored ADR
- SEC Form 6-K filed by BHP Group PlcSponsored ADR
- SEC Form 6-K filed by BHP Group PlcSponsored ADR
- SEC Form 25-NSE filed by BHP Group PlcSponsored ADR
- Golden Cross Appears Before BHP Gr Investors
- SEC Form 6-K filed by BHP Group PlcSponsored ADR
Latest BTU
- Peabody Awarded Grant from U.S. Department of Energy to Advance Domestic Rare Earth and Critical Mineral Supply Chain
- SEC Form 8-K filed by Peabody Energy Corporation
- Peabody Names Bryan Quinn President of Global Operations
- Peabody Energy Corporation filed SEC Form 8-K: Regulation FD Disclosure
- Peabody Announces New Surety Arrangements in the U.S. and Australia
- Director Malone Robert A was granted 71 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.12% to 58,640 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Walker Clayton D. was granted 20 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.25% to 7,904 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Hodges Georganne was granted 21 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.26% to 8,042 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Chirekos Nicholas J. was granted 68 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.15% to 44,619 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Gorman Stephen E was granted 65 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.11% to 57,669 units (SEC Form 4)