Compare · BHP vs BTU
BHP vs BTU
Side-by-side comparison of BHP Group Limited (BHP) and Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU): market cap, price performance, sector, and recent activity on the wire.
Summary
- Both BHP and BTU operate in Coal Mining (Energy), so they compete in similar markets.
- BHP is the larger of the two at $210.74B, about 72.0x BTU ($2.93B).
- BTU has been more active in the news (2 items in the past 4 weeks vs 1 for BHP).
- BHP has more recent analyst coverage (25 ratings vs 8 for BTU).
BHP Group Limited
BHP Group engages in the natural resources business in Australia, Europe, China, Japan, India, South Korea, rest of Asia, North America, South America, and internationally. It operates through Petroleum, Copper, Iron Ore, and Coal segments. The company engages in the exploration, development, and production of oil and gas properties; and mining of copper, silver, zinc, molybdenum, uranium, gold, iron ore, and metallurgical and energy coal. It is also involved in mining, smelting, and refining of nickel; the provision of towing, freight, marketing and trading, marketing support, finance, administrative, and other services; and potash development activities. The company was founded in 1851 and is headquartered in Melbourne, Australia.
Peabody Energy Corporation
Peabody Energy Corporation engages in coal mining business in the United States, Japan, Taiwan, Australia, China, India, Vietnam, South Korea, and internationally. The company operates through Seaborne Thermal Mining, Seaborne Metallurgical Mining, Powder River Basin Mining, and Other U.S. Thermal Mining segments. It is involved in mining, preparation, and sale of thermal coal primarily to electric utilities; mining bituminous and sub-bituminous coal deposits; and mining metallurgical coal, such as hard coking coal, semi-hard coking coal, semi-soft coking coal, and pulverized coal injection coal. The company supplies coal primarily to electricity generators, industrial facilities, and steel manufacturers. As of December 31, 2020, it owned interests in 17 coal mining operations located in the United States and Australia; and had approximately 3.0 billion tons of proven and probable coal reserves and approximately 450,000 acres of surface property through ownership and lease agreements. The company also engages in direct and brokered trading of coal and freight-related contracts, as well as provides transportation-related services, which involve financial derivative contracts and physical contracts. Peabody Energy Corporation was founded in 1883 and is headquartered in St. Louis, Missouri.
Latest BHP
- Group Financial Controller Stone Emma Kate was granted 64 units of Ordinary Shares, increasing direct ownership by 1% to 4,780 units (SEC Form 4)
- SEC Form 6-K filed by BHP Group Limited
- SEC Form 6-K filed by BHP Group Limited
- SEC Form 6-K filed by BHP Group Limited
- SEC Form 6-K filed by BHP Group Limited
- SEC Form 6-K filed by BHP Group Limited
- SEC Form 6-K filed by BHP Group Limited
- Group Financial Controller Stone Emma Kate converted options into 7,774 units of Ordinary Shares and sold $315,465 worth of Ordinary Shares (6,774 units at $46.57), increasing direct ownership by 27% to 4,716 units (SEC Form 4)
- SEC Form 20-F filed by BHP Group Limited
- SEC Form 6-K filed by BHP Group Limited
Latest BTU
- SEC Form 8-K filed by Peabody Energy Corporation
- SEC Form SD filed by Peabody Energy Corporation
- Peabody Announces Full Redemption of 3.250% Convertible Senior Notes due 2028
- Peabody Energy Corporation filed SEC Form 8-K: Regulation FD Disclosure, Financial Statements and Exhibits
- Director Champion William H was granted 101 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.23% to 43,304 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Malone Robert A was granted 52 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.09% to 58,692 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Walker Clayton D. was granted 23 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.29% to 7,927 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Gorman Stephen E was granted 51 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.09% to 57,720 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Hodges Georganne was granted 22 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.27% to 8,064 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Chirekos Nicholas J. was granted 53 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.12% to 44,672 units (SEC Form 4)