Compare · CABR vs ECL
CABR vs ECL
Side-by-side comparison of Caring Brands Inc. (CABR) and Ecolab Inc. (ECL): market cap, price performance, sector, and recent activity on the wire.
Summary
- Both CABR and ECL operate in Package Goods/Cosmetics (Consumer Discretionary), so they compete in similar markets.
- ECL is the larger of the two at $75.64B, about 5737.6x CABR ($13.2M).
- Over the past year, CABR is up 2.1% and ECL is down 1.2% - CABR leads by 3.3 points.
- ECL has been more active in the news (14 items in the past 4 weeks vs 3 for CABR).
- ECL has more recent analyst coverage (25 ratings vs 0 for CABR).
- Company
- Caring Brands Inc.
- Ecolab Inc.
- Price
- $1.44+0.70%
- $268.68+2.04%
- Market cap
- $13.2M
- $75.64B
- 1M return
- +26.32%
- -2.75%
- 1Y return
- +2.13%
- -1.22%
- Industry
- Package Goods/Cosmetics
- Package Goods/Cosmetics
- Exchange
- NASDAQ
- NYSE
- IPO
- News (4w)
- 3
- 14
- Recent ratings
- 0
- 25
Ecolab Inc.
Ecolab Inc. provides water, hygiene, and infection prevention solutions and services worldwide. Its Global Industrial segment offers water treatment and process applications, and cleaning and sanitizing solutions to manufacturing, food and beverage processing, transportation, chemical, metals and mining, power generation, pulp and paper, commercial laundry, petroleum, and petrochemical industries. The company's Global Institutional & Specialty segment provides specialized cleaning and sanitizing products to the foodservice, hospitality, lodging, government and education, and retail industries. Its Global Healthcare & Life Sciences segment offers specialized cleaning and sanitizing products to the healthcare, personal care, and pharmaceutical industries, such as infection prevention and surgical solutions, and end-to-end cleaning and contamination control solutions under the Ecolab, Microtek, and Anios brand names. The company's Other segment offers pest elimination services to detect, eliminate, and prevent pests, such as rodents and insects in restaurants, food and beverage processors, educational and healthcare facilities, hotels, quick service restaurant and grocery operations, and other institutional and commercial customers. This segment also provides colloidal silica for binding and polishing applications in semiconductor, catalyst, and aerospace component manufacturing, as well as chemical industries; and products and services that manage wash process through custom designed programs, premium products, dispensing equipment, water and energy management, and reduction, as well as real time data management. It sells its products through field sales and corporate account personnel, distributors, and dealers. The company was founded in 1923 and is headquartered in St. Paul, Minnesota.
Latest CABR
- SEC Form 8-K filed by Caring Brands Inc.
- Caring Brands Inc. filed SEC Form 8-K: Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement, Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities, Material Modification to Rights of Security Holders, Financial Statements and Exhibits
- SEC Form 8-K filed by Caring Brands Inc.
- SEC Form DEFA14A filed by Caring Brands Inc.
- Caring Brands Inc. filed SEC Form 8-K: Regulation FD Disclosure, Financial Statements and Exhibits
- Caring Brands Inc. and SanPellegrino Cosmetics Private Limited Announce Expanded Multi-Territory Licensing Agreement for Photocil and Hair Enzyme Booster
- Caring Brands Inc. filed SEC Form 8-K: Other Events
- SEC Form DEF 14A filed by Caring Brands Inc.
- SEC Form PRE 14A filed by Caring Brands Inc.
- SEC Form EFFECT filed by Caring Brands Inc.
Latest ECL
- Ecolab upgraded by Oppenheimer with a new price target
- SEC Form SCHEDULE 13G filed by Ecolab Inc.
- Director Zillmer John J was granted 130 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.26% to 49,365 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Whalen Julie was granted 130 shares, increasing direct ownership by 38% to 472 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Vautrinot Suzanne M was granted 130 shares, increasing direct ownership by 1% to 11,805 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Nowell Lionel L Iii was granted 130 shares, increasing direct ownership by 2% to 6,773 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Mckibben Tracy B was granted 130 shares, increasing direct ownership by 1% to 11,668 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Maclennan David was granted 176 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.70% to 25,427 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Larson Michael was granted 130 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.68% to 19,166 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Gross Marion K. was granted 130 shares, increasing direct ownership by 28% to 597 units (SEC Form 4)