Compare · BTU vs CCR
BTU vs CCR
Side-by-side comparison of Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU) and CONSOL Coal Resources LP (CCR): market cap, price performance, sector, and recent activity on the wire.
Summary
- Both BTU and CCR operate in Coal Mining (Energy), so they compete in similar markets.
- BTU carries a market cap of $3.24B.
- BTU has hit the wire 1 time in the past 4 weeks while CCR has been quiet.
- BTU has more recent analyst coverage (7 ratings vs 0 for CCR).
Peabody Energy Corporation
Peabody Energy Corporation engages in coal mining business in the United States, Japan, Taiwan, Australia, China, India, Vietnam, South Korea, and internationally. The company operates through Seaborne Thermal Mining, Seaborne Metallurgical Mining, Powder River Basin Mining, and Other U.S. Thermal Mining segments. It is involved in mining, preparation, and sale of thermal coal primarily to electric utilities; mining bituminous and sub-bituminous coal deposits; and mining metallurgical coal, such as hard coking coal, semi-hard coking coal, semi-soft coking coal, and pulverized coal injection coal. The company supplies coal primarily to electricity generators, industrial facilities, and steel manufacturers. As of December 31, 2020, it owned interests in 17 coal mining operations located in the United States and Australia; and had approximately 3.0 billion tons of proven and probable coal reserves and approximately 450,000 acres of surface property through ownership and lease agreements. The company also engages in direct and brokered trading of coal and freight-related contracts, as well as provides transportation-related services, which involve financial derivative contracts and physical contracts. Peabody Energy Corporation was founded in 1883 and is headquartered in St. Louis, Missouri.
Latest BTU
- SEC Form DEFA14A filed by Peabody Energy Corporation
- Peabody Energy Corporation filed SEC Form 8-K: Regulation FD Disclosure
- Amendment: SEC Form SCHEDULE 13G/A filed by Peabody Energy Corporation
- SEC Form DEFA14A filed by Peabody Energy Corporation
- SEC Form DEF 14A filed by Peabody Energy Corporation
- Director Walker Clayton D. was granted 5 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.22% to 2,268 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Malone Robert A was granted 49 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.09% to 53,271 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Laymon Joe W was granted 113 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.21% to 54,391 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Hodges Georganne was granted 5 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.21% to 2,405 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Gorman Stephen E was granted 44 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.08% to 52,306 units (SEC Form 4)
Latest CCR
- SEC Form 15-12B filed
- SEC Form 4: L Jeffrey Wallace decreased ownership by 100% to 0 units
- SEC Form 4: D Dan Sandman decreased ownership by 100% to 0 units
- SEC Form 4: Miteshkumar Thakkar decreased ownership by 100% to 0 units
- SEC Form 4: A Martha Wiegand decreased ownership by 100% to 0 units
- SEC Form 4: L Michael Greenwood decreased ownership by 100% to 0 units
- SEC Form 4: A James Brock decreased ownership by 100% to 0 units
- SEC Form 4: R. Kurt Salvatori decreased ownership by 100% to 0 units
- SEC Form 2 filed
- SEC Form 8 filed