Compare · CHK vs EOG
CHK vs EOG
Side-by-side comparison of Chesapeake Energy Corporation (CHK) and EOG Resources Inc. (EOG): market cap, price performance, sector, and recent activity on the wire.
Summary
- Both CHK and EOG operate in Oil & Gas Production (Energy), so they compete in similar markets.
- EOG carries a market cap of $77.14B.
- EOG has hit the wire 10 times in the past 4 weeks while CHK has been quiet.
- Both have 25 recent analyst ratings on file.
Chesapeake Energy Corporation
Chesapeake Energy Corporation engages in the acquisition, exploration, and development of properties for the production of oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids (NGL) from underground reservoirs in the United States. The company holds interests in natural gas resource plays, including the Marcellus in Northern Appalachian Basin in Pennsylvania; Haynesville located in Northwestern Louisiana; Eagle Ford in South Texas; Brazos Valley in Southeast Texas; and Powder River Basin in Wyoming. As of December 31, 2020, it owned interests in approximately 7,400 oil and natural gas wells, including 5,900 properties with working interest and 1,500 properties with royalty interest; and had estimated proved reserves of 60 Mmboe. The company was founded in 1989 and is headquartered in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.
EOG Resources Inc.
EOG Resources, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, explores for, develops, produces, and markets crude oil, and natural gas and natural gas liquids. Its principal producing areas are in New Mexico and Texas in the United States; the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago; the People's Republic of China; and the Sultanate of Oman. As of December 31, 2020, it had total estimated net proved reserves of 3,220 million barrels of oil equivalent, including 1,514 million barrels (MMBbl) of crude oil and condensate reserves; 813 MMBbl of natural gas liquid reserves; and 5,360 billion cubic feet of natural gas reserves. The company was formerly known as Enron Oil & Gas Company. EOG Resources, Inc. was incorporated in 1985 and is headquartered in Houston, Texas.
Latest CHK
- EVP-General Counsel Lacy Christopher W was granted 48,543 shares (SEC Form 4)
- Director Konar Shameek was granted 5,907 shares (SEC Form 4)
- Director Kehr Catherine A was granted 48,824 shares (SEC Form 4)
- Director Johnson S P Iv was granted 15,760 shares (SEC Form 4)
- Director Gass John D was granted 32,298 shares (SEC Form 4)
- SEC Form 3 filed by new insider Lacy Christopher W
- SEC Form 3 filed by new insider Konar Shameek
- SEC Form 3 filed by new insider Kehr Catherine A
- SEC Form 3 filed by new insider Johnson S P Iv
- SEC Form 3 filed by new insider Gass John D
Latest EOG
- Chairman & CEO Yacob Ezra Y was granted 2 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.00% to 268,450 units (SEC Form 4)
- EVP & COO Leitzell Jeffrey R. was granted 4 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.00% to 90,794 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Kerr Michael T. was granted 330 shares, increasing direct ownership by 1% to 23,626 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Gaut C Christopher was granted 130 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.56% to 23,192 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Dugle Lynn A was granted 38 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.49% to 7,734 units (SEC Form 4)
- EVP & Chief Legal Officer Donaldson Michael P was granted 134 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.12% to 107,433 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Daniels Robert P was granted 404 shares, increasing direct ownership by 1% to 35,602 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Crisp Charles R was granted 256 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.40% to 63,698 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Clark Janet F was granted 284 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.57% to 49,840 units (SEC Form 4)
- Scotiabank initiated coverage on EOG Resources with a new price target