Compare · CLMT vs COP
CLMT vs COP
Side-by-side comparison of Calumet Inc. (CLMT) and ConocoPhillips (COP): market cap, price performance, sector, and recent activity on the wire.
Summary
- Both CLMT and COP operate in Integrated oil Companies (Energy), so they compete in similar markets.
- COP is the larger of the two at $139.75B, about 37.4x CLMT ($3.73B).
- Over the past year, CLMT is up 159.0% and COP is up 26.0% - CLMT leads by 133.0 points.
- CLMT has been more active in the news (12 items in the past 4 weeks vs 6 for COP).
- COP has more recent analyst coverage (25 ratings vs 19 for CLMT).
Calumet Inc.
Calumet Specialty Products Partners, L.P. produces and sells specialty hydrocarbon products in North America and internationally. Its Specialty Products segment offers various lubricating oils, white mineral oils, solvents, petrolatums, waxes, synthetic lubricants, and other products that are used primarily as raw material components for basic industrial, consumer, and automotive goods. The company's Fuel Products segment provides fuel and fuel-related products, including gasoline, diesel, jet fuel, asphalt, and heavy fuel oils, as well as resells purchased crude oil to third party customers. Calumet GP, LLC serves as the general partner for Calumet Specialty Products Partners, L.P. The company was founded in 1916 and is headquartered in Indianapolis, Indiana.
ConocoPhillips
ConocoPhillips explores for, produces, transports, and markets crude oil, bitumen, natural gas, liquefied natural gas (LNG), and natural gas liquids worldwide. The company primarily engages in the conventional and tight oil reservoirs, shale gas, heavy oil, LNG, oil sands, and other production operations. Its portfolio includes unconventional plays in North America; conventional assets in North America, Europe, Asia, and Australia; various LNG developments; oil sands assets in Canada; and an inventory of conventional and unconventional exploration prospects. The company was founded in 1917 and is headquartered in Houston, Texas.
Latest CLMT
- Director Boss John G. converted options into 7,067 shares and covered exercise/tax liability with 2,827 shares, increasing direct ownership by 15% to 33,033 units (SEC Form 4) to satisfy withholding tax
- Director Mawer Stephen P converted options into 13,780 shares and covered exercise/tax liability with 5,512 shares, increasing direct ownership by 3% to 311,578 units (SEC Form 4) (withholding tax)
- Director Raymond Paul C converted options into 7,067 shares and covered exercise/tax liability with 2,827 shares, increasing direct ownership by 17% to 28,973 units (SEC Form 4) (tax withholding)
- Director Sajkowski Daniel J converted options into 7,067 shares and covered exercise/tax liability with 2,827 shares, increasing direct ownership by 5% to 81,958 units (SEC Form 4) (withholding obligation)
- Director Schumacher Amy M converted options into 7,067 shares, increasing direct ownership by 3% to 258,160 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Quintana Julio M converted options into 7,067 shares (SEC Form 4)
- Director Narwold Karen G converted options into 7,067 shares (SEC Form 4)
- Director Twitchell Karen A. converted options into 7,067 shares, increasing direct ownership by 112% to 13,389 units (SEC Form 4)
- Montana Renewables Collaborates with Gulfstream for Low Emissions Testing
- Calumet Issues Redemption Notice for $100 Million of 9.75% Senior Notes due 2028
Latest COP
- ConocoPhillips reaches agreement supporting redevelopment of producing oil fields in Iraq
- SEC Form S-8 POS filed by ConocoPhillips
- SEC Form S-8 POS filed by ConocoPhillips
- SEC Form S-8 POS filed by ConocoPhillips
- SEC Form S-8 POS filed by ConocoPhillips
- SEC Form S-3ASR filed by ConocoPhillips
- ConocoPhillips to hold second-quarter earnings conference call on Thursday, Aug. 6
- SEC Form 11-K filed by ConocoPhillips
- ConocoPhillips filed SEC Form 8-K: Leadership Update
- ConocoPhillips upgraded by Roth Capital with a new price target