Compare · ELPC vs NRG
ELPC vs NRG
Side-by-side comparison of Companhia Paranaense de Energia (COPEL) (ELPC) and NRG Energy Inc. (NRG): market cap, price performance, sector, and recent activity on the wire.
Summary
- Both ELPC and NRG operate in Electric Utilities: Central (Utilities), so they compete in similar markets.
- NRG is the larger of the two at $29.31B, about 3.4x ELPC ($8.67B).
- Over the past year, ELPC is up 38.2% and NRG is down 8.7% - ELPC leads by 46.9 points.
- NRG has been more active in the news (14 items in the past 4 weeks vs 1 for ELPC).
- NRG has more recent analyst coverage (25 ratings vs 1 for ELPC).
- Company
- Companhia Paranaense de Energia (COPEL)
- NRG Energy Inc.
- Price
- $11.61+2.52%
- $138.83+2.75%
- Market cap
- $8.67B
- $29.31B
- 1M return
- -4.52%
- +3.62%
- 1Y return
- +38.21%
- -8.66%
- Industry
- Electric Utilities: Central
- Electric Utilities: Central
- Exchange
- NYSE
- NYSE
- IPO
- 2023
- News (4w)
- 1
- 14
- Recent ratings
- 1
- 25
NRG Energy Inc.
NRG Energy, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, operates as an integrated power company in the United States. It operates through Texas, East, and West. The company is involved in the producing, selling, and delivering electricity and related products and services to 3.6 million residential, industrial, and commercial consumers. It generates electricity using natural gas, coal, oil, solar, nuclear, and battery storage. The company also provides system power, distributed generation, renewable products, backup generation, storage and distributed solar, demand response, energy efficiency, advisory, and on-site energy solutions; and carbon management and specialty services. In addition, it trades in electric power, natural gas, and related commodities; environmental products; weather products; and financial products, including forwards, futures, options, and swaps. Further, the company procures fuels; provides transportation services; and directly sells energy, services, and products and services to retail customers under the NRG, Reliant, Green Mountain Energy, Stream, XOOM Energy, and other brand names. As of December 31, 2020, it owns power generation portfolio with approximately 23,000 megawatts of capacity at 33 plants. NRG Energy, Inc. was founded in 1989 and is headquartered in Princeton, New Jersey.
Latest ELPC
- SEC Form 6-K filed by Companhia Paranaense de Energia (COPEL)
- SEC Form 6-K filed by Companhia Paranaense de Energia (COPEL)
- SEC Form 6-K filed by Companhia Paranaense de Energia (COPEL)
- SEC Form 6-K filed by Companhia Paranaense de Energia (COPEL)
- SEC Form 6-K filed by Companhia Paranaense de Energia (COPEL)
- COPEL - Copel's Recurring Ebitda Amounted to R$ 1,754.6 Million in 1Q26, a 16.7% Increase Compared to the R$ 1,503.2 Million Recorded in 1Q25
- SEC Form 6-K filed by Companhia Paranaense de Energia (COPEL)
- SEC Form 6-K filed by Companhia Paranaense de Energia (COPEL)
- SEC Form 6-K filed by Companhia Paranaense de Energia (COPEL)
- SEC Form 6-K filed by Companhia Paranaense de Energia (COPEL)
Latest NRG
- Exec VP, Chief Admin Officer Kinney Virginia sold $2,550,420 worth of shares (20,000 units at $127.52) as part of a pre-agreed trading plan, decreasing direct ownership by 31% to 45,111 units (SEC Form 4)
- Exec VP, Chief Admin Officer Kinney Virginia exercised 16,955 shares at a strike of $7.67 and covered exercise/tax liability with 7,369 shares, increasing direct ownership by 17% to 65,111 units (SEC Form 4) to satisfy withholding obligation
- EVP & CFO Chung Bruce exercised 23,738 shares at a strike of $7.67 and covered exercise/tax liability with 13,409 shares, increasing direct ownership by 13% to 89,592 units (SEC Form 4) (tax liability)
- Director Wright Glenn Tracy was granted 1,422 shares, increasing direct ownership by 2,844% to 1,472 units (SEC Form 4)
- New insider Wright Glenn Tracy claimed ownership of 50 shares (SEC Form 3)
- Director Zlotnik Marcie was granted 1,422 shares, increasing direct ownership by 20% to 8,692 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Pruner Alexandra was granted 1,557 shares, increasing direct ownership by 5% to 32,680 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Pourbaix Alexander J was granted 2,619 shares, increasing direct ownership by 15% to 19,837 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Donohue Elisabeth B was granted 1,499 shares, increasing direct ownership by 5% to 29,050 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Kapoor Sanjay was granted 2,464 shares, increasing direct ownership by 169% to 3,921 units (SEC Form 4)