Compare · EOG vs SM
EOG vs SM
Side-by-side comparison of EOG Resources Inc. (EOG) and SM Energy Company (SM): market cap, price performance, sector, and recent activity on the wire.
Summary
- Both EOG and SM operate in Oil & Gas Production (Energy), so they compete in similar markets.
- EOG is the larger of the two at $77.02B, about 9.1x SM ($8.49B).
- EOG has been more active in the news (14 items in the past 4 weeks vs 9 for SM).
- Both have 25 recent analyst ratings on file.
EOG Resources Inc.
EOG Resources, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, explores for, develops, produces, and markets crude oil, and natural gas and natural gas liquids. Its principal producing areas are in New Mexico and Texas in the United States; the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago; the People's Republic of China; and the Sultanate of Oman. As of December 31, 2020, it had total estimated net proved reserves of 3,220 million barrels of oil equivalent, including 1,514 million barrels (MMBbl) of crude oil and condensate reserves; 813 MMBbl of natural gas liquid reserves; and 5,360 billion cubic feet of natural gas reserves. The company was formerly known as Enron Oil & Gas Company. EOG Resources, Inc. was incorporated in 1985 and is headquartered in Houston, Texas.
SM Energy Company
SM Energy Company, an independent energy company, engages in the acquisition, exploration, development, and production of oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids in the state of Texas. As of December 31, 2020, it had 404.6 million barrels of oil equivalent of estimated proved reserves; and working interests in 801 gross productive oil wells and 498 gross productive gas wells in the Midland Basin and South Texas. The company was formerly known as St. Mary Land & Exploration Company and changed its name to SM Energy Company in May 2010. SM Energy Company was founded in 1908 and is headquartered in Denver, Colorado.
Latest EOG
- EOG Resources downgraded by CapitalOne with a new price target
- Chairman & CEO Yacob Ezra Y sold $5,466,670 worth of shares (35,942 units at $152.10), decreasing direct ownership by 13% to 242,451 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Clark Janet F was granted 314 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.64% to 49,555 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Crisp Charles R was granted 283 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.45% to 63,443 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Daniels Robert P was granted 446 shares, increasing direct ownership by 1% to 35,199 units (SEC Form 4)
- EVP & Chief Legal Officer Donaldson Michael P was granted 148 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.14% to 107,894 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Dugle Lynn A was granted 42 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.55% to 7,696 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Gaut C Christopher was granted 143 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.62% to 23,063 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Kerr Michael T. was granted 365 shares, increasing direct ownership by 2% to 23,296 units (SEC Form 4)
- EVP & COO Leitzell Jeffrey R. was granted 4 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.00% to 88,054 units (SEC Form 4)
Latest SM
- EVP, GC & Corp Secretary Lebeck James Barker sold $647,850 worth of shares (17,500 units at $37.02), decreasing direct ownership by 54% to 14,705 units (SEC Form 4)
- EVP & CFO Pursell A Wade gifted 5,000 shares, decreasing direct ownership by 1% to 426,531 units (SEC Form 4)
- SM Energy Declares Quarterly Cash Dividend
- SM Energy upgraded by Wells Fargo with a new price target
- SEC Form SCHEDULE 13G filed by SM Energy Company
- SEC Form 10-Q filed by SM Energy Company
- SM Energy Company filed SEC Form 8-K: Results of Operations and Financial Condition, Regulation FD Disclosure, Financial Statements and Exhibits
- SM Energy Reports Second Quarter 2026 Results
- SM Energy Announces Redemption of All Outstanding 2027 Senior Notes
- EnerCom Announces SM Energy as a Keynote Speaker at the 31st EnerCom Denver - The Energy Investment Conference, on August 19, 2026, in Denver, Colorado