Compare · FIGS vs LULU
FIGS vs LULU
Side-by-side comparison of FIGS Inc. (FIGS) and lululemon athletica inc. (LULU): market cap, price performance, sector, and recent activity on the wire.
Summary
- Both FIGS and LULU operate in Apparel (Consumer Discretionary), so they compete in similar markets.
- LULU is the larger of the two at $12.72B, about 7.8x FIGS ($1.62B).
- Over the past year, FIGS is up 65.8% and LULU is down 47.2% - FIGS leads by 113.0 points.
- LULU has been more active in the news (15 items in the past 4 weeks vs 3 for FIGS).
- Both have 25 recent analyst ratings on file.
- Company
- FIGS Inc.
- lululemon athletica inc.
- Price
- $9.71-2.71%
- $117.33-2.46%
- Market cap
- $1.62B
- $12.72B
- 1M return
- -13.77%
- -3.61%
- 1Y return
- +65.84%
- -47.17%
- Industry
- Apparel
- Apparel
- Exchange
- NYSE
- NASDAQ
- IPO
- 2021
- 2007
- News (4w)
- 3
- 15
- Recent ratings
- 25
- 25
FIGS Inc.
FIGS, Inc. operates as a direct-to-consumer healthcare apparel and lifestyle company in the United States. It designs and sells healthcare apparel and other non-scrub offerings, such as lab coats, under scrubs, outerwear, activewear, loungewear, compression socks footwear, masks, and face shields. The company markets and sells its products through its digital platform comprising website and mobile app. FIGS, Inc. was founded in 2013 and is headquartered in Santa Monica, California.
lululemon athletica inc.
lululemon athletica inc., together with its subsidiaries, designs, distributes, and retails athletic apparel and accessories for women and men. It operates through two segments, Company-Operated Stores and Direct to Consumer. The company offers pants, shorts, tops, and jackets for healthy lifestyle and athletic activities, such as yoga, running, and training, as well as other sweaty pursuits. It also provides fitness-related accessories. The company sells its products through a chain of company-operated stores; outlets and warehouse sales; a network of wholesale accounts, such as yoga studios, health clubs, and fitness centers; temporary locations, including seasonal stores; and license and supply arrangements, as well as directly to consumer through mobile apps, and lululemon.com e-commerce website. As of January 31, 2021, it operated 521 company-operated stores under the lululemon brand in the United States, Canada, the People's Republic of China, Australia, the United Kingdom, Japan, New Zealand, Germany, South Korea, Singapore, France, Malaysia, Sweden, Ireland, the Netherlands, Norway, and Switzerland. lululemon athletica inc. was founded in 1998 and is based in Vancouver, Canada.
Latest FIGS
- Chief Financial Officer Oughtred Sarah covered exercise/tax liability with 22,197 shares, decreasing direct ownership by 2% to 1,110,127 units (SEC Form 4) (for tax liability)
- Chief Executive Officer Spear Catherine Eva covered exercise/tax liability with 61,556 shares, decreasing direct ownership by 3% to 1,733,408 units (SEC Form 4) (for tax liability)
- Executive Chairman Hasson Heather L. covered exercise/tax liability with 6,813 shares, decreasing direct ownership by 0.48% to 1,426,994 units (SEC Form 4) to cover taxes
- FIGS Inc. filed SEC Form 8-K: Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
- Director Wilke Jeffrey A was granted 15,456 shares, increasing direct ownership by 7% to 227,577 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Jao Hsiao Yueh was granted 15,456 shares, increasing direct ownership by 19% to 97,719 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Whelan Melanie Anya was granted 15,456 shares, increasing direct ownership by 38% to 55,683 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Marte Mario Jesus was granted 15,456 shares, increasing direct ownership by 22% to 86,046 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Lin Kenneth Jian-Hong was granted 15,456 shares, increasing direct ownership by 11% to 161,705 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Willhite John Martin was granted 15,456 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.48% to 3,263,095 units (SEC Form 4)
Latest LULU
- SEC Form S-8 filed by lululemon athletica inc.
- Director Maurer Marc was granted 1,606 shares (SEC Form 4)
- Director Gentile Laura was granted 1,606 shares, increasing direct ownership by 161% to 2,606 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Mahe Isabel was granted 1,606 shares, increasing direct ownership by 64% to 4,125 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Mcneill Jon was granted 1,606 shares, increasing direct ownership by 17% to 10,928 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Bracey Esi Eggleston was granted 1,606 shares, increasing direct ownership by 650% to 1,853 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Henry Kathryn was granted 1,606 shares, increasing direct ownership by 29% to 7,122 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Bergh Charles V was granted 1,606 shares, increasing direct ownership by 590% to 1,878 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director List Teri was granted 1,606 shares, increasing direct ownership by 130% to 2,839 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Loehnis Alison was granted 1,606 shares, increasing direct ownership by 73% to 3,808 units (SEC Form 4)