Compare · GRO vs USLM
GRO vs USLM
Side-by-side comparison of Brazil Potash Corp. (GRO) and United States Lime & Minerals Inc. (USLM): market cap, price performance, sector, and recent activity on the wire.
Summary
- Both GRO and USLM operate in Mining & Quarrying of Nonmetallic Minerals (No Fuels) (Industrials), so they compete in similar markets.
- USLM is the larger of the two at $3.01B, about 23.5x GRO ($128.2M).
- Over the past year, GRO is down 23.9% and USLM is down 17.1% - USLM leads by 6.8 points.
- GRO has hit the wire 1 time in the past 4 weeks while USLM has been quiet.
- GRO has more recent analyst coverage (3 ratings vs 0 for USLM).
- Company
- Brazil Potash Corp.
- United States Lime & Minerals Inc.
- Price
- $2.04-1.69%
- $107.66+0.66%
- Market cap
- $128.2M
- $3.01B
- 1M return
- -13.74%
- -6.16%
- 1Y return
- -23.88%
- -17.06%
- Industry
- Mining & Quarrying of Nonmetallic Minerals (No Fuels)
- Mining & Quarrying of Nonmetallic Minerals (No Fuels)
- Exchange
- AMEX
- NASDAQ
- IPO
- 2024
- News (4w)
- 1
- 0
- Recent ratings
- 3
- 0
United States Lime & Minerals Inc.
United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. manufactures and supplies lime and limestone products in the United States. The company extracts limestone from open-pit quarries and an underground mine, and processes it as pulverized limestone, quicklime, hydrated lime, and lime slurry. It supplies its products primarily to the construction customers, including highway, road, and building contractors; industrial customers, such as paper and glass manufacturers; environmental customers comprising municipal sanitation and water treatment facilities, and flue gas treatment processes; steel producers; oil and gas services companies; roof shingle manufacturers; and poultry and cattle feed producers. The company also has various royalty interests and non-operating working interests with respect to oil and gas rights in natural gas wells located in Johnson County, Texas in the Barnett Shale Formation. United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. was founded in 1948 and is headquartered in Dallas, Texas.
Latest GRO
- Brazil Potash AI-Powered X-Ray Transmission Sorting Testing Shows Potential for Higher Production and Longer Mine Life
- Brazil Potash Reduces Upfront Capex with 28-Year Construction & Backup Power Contract
- Brazil’s Government Supports Potash Construction Financing
- Brazil's Supreme Federal Court Issues Favorable Decision for Brazil Potash
- Brazil Senate Passes Law to Incentivize New Domestic Fertilizer Production With Several Potential Construction Funding Benefits for Brazil Potash
- SEC Form 6-K filed by Brazil Potash Corp.
- Brazil’s Court of Appeal Perserves Rulings Favourable to the Autazes Potash Project, Blocks Referral of Appeals to Superior Courts
- Amendment: SEC Form SCHEDULE 13G/A filed by Brazil Potash Corp.
- Canaccord Genuity initiated coverage on Brazil Potash Corp. with a new price target
- SEC Form 6-K filed by Brazil Potash Corp.
Latest USLM
- Director Doumet Antoine M sold $2,200,000 worth of USLM Common Stock (20,000 units at $110.00), decreasing direct ownership by 18% to 90,000 units (SEC Form 4)
- Large owner Candou Holdings Ltd. bought $2,200,000 worth of USLM Common Stock (20,000 units at $110.00) (SEC Form 4)
- SEC Form SD filed by United States Lime & Minerals Inc.
- SEC Form 10-Q filed by United States Lime & Minerals Inc.
- United States Lime & Minerals Reports Second Quarter 2026 Results and Declares Regular Quarterly Cash Dividend
- United States Lime & Minerals Inc. filed SEC Form 8-K: Results of Operations and Financial Condition, Financial Statements and Exhibits
- Marvell Technology and Flex Set to Join S&P 500; Others to Join S&P MidCap 400 and S&P SmallCap 600
- Director Hawkins Tom S Jr was granted 1,273 units of USLM Common Stock, increasing direct ownership by 13% to 11,356 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Wolkenstein Jon A was granted 1,273 units of USLM Common Stock, increasing direct ownership by 44% to 4,176 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Weirich Lila R was granted 1,273 units of USLM Common Stock, increasing direct ownership by 44% to 4,176 units (SEC Form 4)