Compare · JILL vs LULU
JILL vs LULU
Side-by-side comparison of J. Jill Inc. (JILL) and lululemon athletica inc. (LULU): market cap, price performance, sector, and recent activity on the wire.
Summary
- Both JILL and LULU operate in Apparel (Consumer Discretionary), so they compete in similar markets.
- LULU is the larger of the two at $12.61B, about 50.8x JILL ($248.3M).
- Over the past year, JILL is up 11.0% and LULU is down 49.4% - JILL leads by 60.5 points.
- LULU has been more active in the news (16 items in the past 4 weeks vs 12 for JILL).
- LULU has more recent analyst coverage (25 ratings vs 10 for JILL).
- Company
- J. Jill Inc.
- lululemon athletica inc.
- Price
- $16.69-0.42%
- $116.24-2.13%
- Market cap
- $248.3M
- $12.61B
- 1M return
- +13.15%
- +0.68%
- 1Y return
- +11.04%
- -49.41%
- Industry
- Apparel
- Apparel
- Exchange
- NYSE
- NASDAQ
- IPO
- 2017
- 2007
- News (4w)
- 12
- 16
- Recent ratings
- 10
- 25
J. Jill Inc.
J.Jill, Inc. operates as an omnichannel retailer for women's apparel under the J.Jill brand in the United States. The company offers knit and woven tops, bottoms, and dresses, as well as sweaters and outerwear; footwear; and accessories, including scarves, jewelry, and hosiery. The company markets its products through retail stores, Website, and catalogs. As of March 16, 2021, it operated 267 stores. The company was founded in 1959 and is headquartered in Quincy, Massachusetts.
lululemon athletica inc.
lululemon athletica inc., together with its subsidiaries, designs, distributes, and retails athletic apparel and accessories for women and men. It operates through two segments, Company-Operated Stores and Direct to Consumer. The company offers pants, shorts, tops, and jackets for healthy lifestyle and athletic activities, such as yoga, running, and training, as well as other sweaty pursuits. It also provides fitness-related accessories. The company sells its products through a chain of company-operated stores; outlets and warehouse sales; a network of wholesale accounts, such as yoga studios, health clubs, and fitness centers; temporary locations, including seasonal stores; and license and supply arrangements, as well as directly to consumer through mobile apps, and lululemon.com e-commerce website. As of January 31, 2021, it operated 521 company-operated stores under the lululemon brand in the United States, Canada, the People's Republic of China, Australia, the United Kingdom, Japan, New Zealand, Germany, South Korea, Singapore, France, Malaysia, Sweden, Ireland, the Netherlands, Norway, and Switzerland. lululemon athletica inc. was founded in 1998 and is based in Vancouver, Canada.
Latest JILL
- Officer Staples Elliot acquired 116 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.35% to 33,252 units (SEC Form 4)
- EVP, CFO & COO Webb Mark W. acquired 415 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.24% to 176,793 units (SEC Form 4)
- Officer O'Connor Courtney acquired 154 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.57% to 27,251 units (SEC Form 4)
- Officer Martinez Maria D. acquired 179 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.39% to 45,639 units (SEC Form 4)
- CEO & President Coyne Mary Ellen acquired 907 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.49% to 187,385 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Rao Jyothi acquired 47 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.17% to 28,404 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Rahamim Michael acquired 47 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.01% to 380,891 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Milano Shelley B acquired 47 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.18% to 26,784 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Eck Michael A acquired 47 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.11% to 43,996 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Chun Courtnee A acquired 47 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.32% to 14,768 units (SEC Form 4)
Latest LULU
- lululemon athletica downgraded by Truist with a new price target
- SEC Form S-8 filed by lululemon athletica inc.
- Director Maurer Marc was granted 1,606 shares (SEC Form 4)
- Director Gentile Laura was granted 1,606 shares, increasing direct ownership by 161% to 2,606 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Mahe Isabel was granted 1,606 shares, increasing direct ownership by 64% to 4,125 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Mcneill Jon was granted 1,606 shares, increasing direct ownership by 17% to 10,928 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Bracey Esi Eggleston was granted 1,606 shares, increasing direct ownership by 650% to 1,853 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Henry Kathryn was granted 1,606 shares, increasing direct ownership by 29% to 7,122 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Bergh Charles V was granted 1,606 shares, increasing direct ownership by 590% to 1,878 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director List Teri was granted 1,606 shares, increasing direct ownership by 130% to 2,839 units (SEC Form 4)