Compare · ETR vs MCGA
ETR vs MCGA
Side-by-side comparison of Entergy Corporation (ETR) and Yorkville Acquisition Corp. (MCGA): market cap, price performance, sector, and recent activity on the wire.
Summary
- Both ETR and MCGA operate in Electric Utilities: Central (Utilities), so they compete in similar markets.
- ETR carries a market cap of $50.06B.
- Over the past year, ETR is up 24.9% and MCGA is down 2.7% - ETR leads by 27.6 points.
- ETR has hit the wire 13 times in the past 4 weeks while MCGA has been quiet.
- ETR has more recent analyst coverage (25 ratings vs 0 for MCGA).
Entergy Corporation
Entergy Corporation, together with its subsidiaries, engages in the production and distribution of electricity in the United States. The company generates electricity through gas/oil, nuclear, coal, hydro, and solar power sources. It operates in two segments, Utility and Entergy Wholesale Commodities. The company's Utility segment generates, transmits, distributes, and sells electric power in portions of Arkansas, Mississippi, Texas, and Louisiana, including the City of New Orleans; and distributes natural gas. Its Entergy Wholesale Commodities segment engages in the ownership, operation, and decommissioning of nuclear power plants located in the northern United States; sale of electric power to wholesale customers; provision of services to other nuclear power plant owners; and owning interests in non-nuclear power plants that sell electric power to wholesale customers. It sells energy to retail power providers, utilities, electric power co-operatives, power trading organizations, and other power generation companies. The company's power plants have approximately 30,000 megawatts (MW) of electric generating capacity, which include 8,000 MW of nuclear power. The company delivers electricity to 3.0 million utility customers in Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas. Entergy Corporation was incorporated in 1949 and is based in New Orleans, Louisiana.
Latest ETR
- Entergy Corporation filed SEC Form 8-K: Other Events
- Director Ropp Ralph Lewis was granted 218 shares, increasing direct ownership by 6% to 3,641 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Puckett Karen A was granted 218 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.64% to 34,441 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Levenick Stuart L was granted 218 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.46% to 47,427 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Hyland M Elise was granted 218 shares, increasing direct ownership by 1% to 19,644 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Frederickson Philip L was granted 218 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.65% to 33,857 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Ellis Brian W was granted 218 shares, increasing direct ownership by 2% to 14,671 units (SEC Form 4)
- SEC Form 4 filed by Director Donald Kirkland H
- Director Caldwell James Frank Jr was granted 218 shares, increasing direct ownership by 21% to 1,242 units (SEC Form 4)
- SEC Form 4 filed by Director Burbank John R
Latest MCGA
- Amendment: SEC Form SCHEDULE 13G/A filed by Yorkville Acquisition Corp.
- SEC Form 10-Q filed by Yorkville Acquisition Corp.
- SEC Form 8-K filed by Yorkville Acquisition Corp.
- SEC Form 4 filed by Director Angelo Mark
- Yorkville Acquisition Corp. filed SEC Form 8-K: Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement, Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation, Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities
- SEC Form 10-Q filed by Yorkville Acquisition Corp.
- Amendment: SEC Form SCHEDULE 13G/A filed by Yorkville Acquisition Corp.
- Amendment: SEC Form SCHEDULE 13G/A filed by Yorkville Acquisition Corp.
- SEC Form SCHEDULE 13G filed by Yorkville Acquisition Corp.
- SEC Form SCHEDULE 13G filed by Yorkville Acquisition Corp.