Compare · MEI vs VLTO
MEI vs VLTO
Side-by-side comparison of Methode Electronics Inc. (MEI) and Veralto Corp (VLTO): market cap, price performance, sector, and recent activity on the wire.
Summary
- MEI operates in Technology, while VLTO operates in Industrials - the two are in different parts of the market.
- VLTO is the larger of the two at $23.04B, about 43.3x MEI ($531.7M).
- Over the past year, MEI is up 123.8% and VLTO is down 8.2% - MEI leads by 132.0 points.
- VLTO has been more active in the news (14 items in the past 4 weeks vs 3 for MEI).
- VLTO has more recent analyst coverage (19 ratings vs 7 for MEI).
- Company
- Methode Electronics Inc.
- Veralto Corp
- Price
- $14.97-2.38%
- $93.80-0.39%
- Market cap
- $531.7M
- $23.04B
- 1M return
- +29.50%
- +11.66%
- 1Y return
- +123.77%
- -8.19%
- Industry
- Electrical Products
- Electrical Products
- Exchange
- NYSE
- NYSE
- IPO
- 2023
- News (4w)
- 3
- 14
- Recent ratings
- 7
- 19
Methode Electronics Inc.
Methode Electronics, Inc. designs, manufactures, and markets component and subsystem devices worldwide. It operates through four segments: Automotive, Industrial, Interface, and Medical. The Automotive segment supplies electronic and electro-mechanical devices, and related products to automobile original equipment manufacturers directly or through their tiered suppliers. Its products include integrated center consoles, hidden switches, ergonomic switches, transmission lead-frames, and LED-based lighting and sensors, which incorporate magneto-elastic sensing and other technologies that monitor the operation or status of a component or system. The Industrial segment manufactures lighting solutions; industrial safety radio remote controls; braided flexible cables; current-carrying laminated busbars and devices; custom power-product assemblies, such as PowerRail solution; high-current low-voltage flexible power cabling systems; and powder-coated busbars that are used in various markets and applications comprising aerospace, commercial vehicles, computers, industrial, power conversion, military, telecommunications, and transportation. The Interface segment provides various copper based transceivers and related accessories for the cloud computing hardware equipment and telecommunications broadband equipment markets; user interface solutions for the appliance, commercial food service, and point-of-sale equipment markets; and luid-level sensors for the marine/recreational vehicle and sump pump markets. The Medical segment offers Dabir Surfaces, a surface support technology aimed at pressure injury prevention for use by patients who are immobilized or otherwise at risk for pressure injuries, including patients undergoing long-duration surgical procedures. The company was founded in 1946 and is headquartered in Chicago, Illinois.
Latest MEI
- CEO and President Degaynor Jonathan B covered exercise/tax liability with 7,986 shares, decreasing direct ownership by 2% to 413,592 units (SEC Form 4) to satisfy withholding obligation
- NIRI Chicago Elects 2026-2027 Officers and Directors
- Methode Electronics upgraded by Barrington Research with a new price target
- Methode Electronics downgraded by Sidoti with a new price target
- SEC Form 11-K filed by Methode Electronics Inc.
- SEC Form 10-K filed by Methode Electronics Inc.
- Methode Electronics Inc. filed SEC Form 8-K: Results of Operations and Financial Condition, Financial Statements and Exhibits
- Methode Electronics, Inc. Reports Fiscal 2026 Fourth Quarter and Full Year Financial Results
- Methode Electronics Announces Fourth Quarter and Full Year Fiscal 2026 Results Conference Call
- Methode Electronics' Board Approves Dividend
Latest VLTO
- Director Schwieters John T was granted 1,009 shares, increasing direct ownership by 18% to 6,498 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Williams Thomas was granted 1,009 shares, increasing direct ownership by 43% to 3,380 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Wallis-Lage Cindy L. was granted 1,009 shares, increasing direct ownership by 43% to 3,380 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Sankaran Vijay P. was granted 1,009 shares, increasing direct ownership by 61% to 2,669 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Mitts Heath A was granted 1,009 shares, increasing direct ownership by 41% to 3,500 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Lohr Walter G was granted 1,009 shares, increasing direct ownership by 43% to 3,380 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director King William was granted 1,009 shares, increasing direct ownership by 12% to 9,557 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Kambeyanda Shyam was granted 1,099 shares, increasing direct ownership by 46% to 3,470 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Comas Daniel L was granted 1,099 shares, increasing direct ownership by 6% to 18,509 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Colpron Francoise was granted 1,099 shares, increasing direct ownership by 46% to 3,470 units (SEC Form 4)