Compare · MRCY vs VLTO
MRCY vs VLTO
Side-by-side comparison of Mercury Systems Inc (MRCY) and Veralto Corp (VLTO): market cap, price performance, sector, and recent activity on the wire.
Summary
- MRCY operates in Technology, while VLTO operates in Industrials - the two are in different parts of the market.
- VLTO is the larger of the two at $23.04B, about 4.0x MRCY ($5.77B).
- Over the past year, MRCY is up 84.0% and VLTO is down 8.2% - MRCY leads by 92.2 points.
- VLTO has hit the wire 14 times in the past 4 weeks while MRCY has been quiet.
- MRCY has more recent analyst coverage (25 ratings vs 19 for VLTO).
- Company
- Mercury Systems Inc
- Veralto Corp
- Price
- $96.26+0.21%
- $93.80-0.39%
- Market cap
- $5.77B
- $23.04B
- 1M return
- -14.44%
- +11.66%
- 1Y return
- +83.98%
- -8.19%
- Industry
- Electrical Products
- Electrical Products
- Exchange
- NASDAQ
- NYSE
- IPO
- 1998
- 2023
- News (4w)
- 0
- 14
- Recent ratings
- 25
- 19
Mercury Systems Inc
Mercury Systems, Inc., a technology company, engages in the manufacture and sale of components, products, modules, and subsystems for aerospace and defense industries in the United States, Europe, and the Asia Pacific. The company's products and solutions are deployed in approximately 300 programs with 25 defense contractors and commercial aviation customers. It offers components, including power amplifiers and limiters, switches, oscillators, filters, equalizers, digital and analog converters, chips, monolithic microwave integrated circuits, and memory and storage devices; modules and sub-assemblies, such as embedded processing modules and boards, switch fabric boards, digital receiver boards, multi-chip modules, integrated radio frequency and microwave multi-function assemblies, tuners, and transceivers, as well as graphics and video processing, and Ethernet and input-output boards; and integrated subsystems. The company also designs and develops digital radio frequency memory units for various modern electronic warfare applications; radar environment simulation and test systems for defense and intelligence applications; and signals intelligence payloads and EO/IR technologies for small UAV platforms, as well as onboard UAV processor systems for real-time wide area motion imagery. In addition, it designs, markets, and sells products intended to protect electronic systems that are critical to national security. The company was formerly known as Mercury Computer Systems, Inc. and changed its name to Mercury Systems, Inc. in November 2012. Mercury Systems, Inc. was incorporated in 1981 and is headquartered in Andover, Massachusetts.
Latest MRCY
- SEC Form SD filed by Mercury Systems Inc
- Director Lance Howard L sold $922,744 worth of shares (9,250 units at $99.76) (SEC Form 4)
- The Hypersonic Test Bottleneck Is Real — And Five Companies Are Building the Infrastructure to Fix It
- Director Carvalho Orlando D sold $625,527 worth of shares (7,000 units at $89.36), decreasing direct ownership by 12% to 52,448 units (SEC Form 4)
- EVP, CHRO Ratner Steven sold $184,920 worth of shares (2,000 units at $92.46), decreasing direct ownership by 6% to 32,238 units (SEC Form 4)
- SEC Form SCHEDULE 13G filed by Mercury Systems Inc
- SEC Form 10-Q filed by Mercury Systems Inc
- Mercury Systems Inc filed SEC Form 8-K: Results of Operations and Financial Condition, Financial Statements and Exhibits
- The Camera Is the New Sensor: Why a Provisional Patent Filing in Hollywood Could Reshape How the Pentagon Buys Vision
- SEC Form 4 filed by Nearhos Barry R
Latest VLTO
- Director Schwieters John T was granted 1,009 shares, increasing direct ownership by 18% to 6,498 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Williams Thomas was granted 1,009 shares, increasing direct ownership by 43% to 3,380 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Wallis-Lage Cindy L. was granted 1,009 shares, increasing direct ownership by 43% to 3,380 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Sankaran Vijay P. was granted 1,009 shares, increasing direct ownership by 61% to 2,669 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Mitts Heath A was granted 1,009 shares, increasing direct ownership by 41% to 3,500 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Lohr Walter G was granted 1,009 shares, increasing direct ownership by 43% to 3,380 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director King William was granted 1,009 shares, increasing direct ownership by 12% to 9,557 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Kambeyanda Shyam was granted 1,099 shares, increasing direct ownership by 46% to 3,470 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Comas Daniel L was granted 1,099 shares, increasing direct ownership by 6% to 18,509 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Colpron Francoise was granted 1,099 shares, increasing direct ownership by 46% to 3,470 units (SEC Form 4)