Compare · NINE vs WBI
NINE vs WBI
Side-by-side comparison of Nine Energy Service Inc. (NINE) and WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC (WBI): market cap, price performance, sector, and recent activity on the wire.
Summary
- Both NINE and WBI operate in Oilfield Services/Equipment (Energy), so they compete in similar markets.
- WBI is the larger of the two at $3.56B, about 88.1x NINE ($40.4M).
- Over the past year, NINE is up 1421.2% and WBI is up 18.9% - NINE leads by 1402.3 points.
- WBI has been more active in the news (15 items in the past 4 weeks vs 5 for NINE).
- WBI has more recent analyst coverage (16 ratings vs 0 for NINE).
- Company
- Nine Energy Service Inc.
- WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC
- Price
- $8.28+0.85%
- $28.53-1.06%
- Market cap
- $40.4M
- $3.56B
- 1M return
- -20.23%
- -8.15%
- 1Y return
- +1421.22%
- +18.95%
- Industry
- Oilfield Services/Equipment
- Oilfield Services/Equipment
- Exchange
- NYSE
- NYSE
- IPO
- 2026
- 2025
- News (4w)
- 5
- 15
- Recent ratings
- 0
- 16
Nine Energy Service Inc.
Nine Energy Service, Inc. operates as an onshore completion services provider that targets unconventional oil and gas resource development across North American basins and internationally. It offers cementing services, which consist of blending high-grade cement and water with various solid and liquid additives to create a cement slurry that is pumped between the casing and the wellbore of the well. The company also provides a portfolio of completion tools, such as liner hangers and accessories, fracture isolation packers, frac sleeves, stage one prep tools, frac plugs, casing flotation tools, specialty open hole float equipment, disk subs, composite cement retainers, and centralizers that provide pinpoint frac sleeve system technologies. In addition, it offers wireline services consisting of plug-and-perf completions, which is a multistage well completion technique for cased-hole wells that consists of deploying perforating guns and isolation tools to a specified depth; and coiled tubing services, which perform wellbore intervention operations utilizing a continuous steel pipe that is transported to the wellsite wound on a large spool in lengths of up to 30,000 feet. Nine Energy Service, Inc. operates 47 wireline pumpdown units and 14 coiled tubing units. The company was formerly known as NSC-Tripoint, Inc. and changed its name to Nine Energy Service, Inc. in October 2011. Nine Energy Service, Inc. was incorporated in 2011 and is headquartered in Houston, Texas.
Latest NINE
- Nine Mile Metals DDH WD-26-15 Intersects (2) VMS Zones Returning 4.88% Cu-Eq Over 7.6m and Acquires 14.42 km² of New Strategic Claims at Its Nine Mile Brook Project
- Nine Energy Service Announces Timing of Third Quarter 2026 Earnings Release and Conference Call
- Nine Mile Metals Commences Trading on the OTCQB Venture Market Exchange
- Nine Mile Metals Mobilizes Second Drill Rig to the Tribag-West Wedge Target Area to Test High-Priority TDEM VMS Targets
- Nine Mile Metals DDH Wd-26-14 Intersects 5.09% Cu-Eq Over 14.15m Including 6.35% Cu-Eq Over 9m and 7.45% Cu-Eq Over 6m
- Amendment: SEC Form SCHEDULE 13G/A filed by Nine Energy Service Inc.
- SEC Form 10-Q filed by Nine Energy Service Inc.
- Nine Energy Service Inc. filed SEC Form 8-K: Results of Operations and Financial Condition, Financial Statements and Exhibits
- Nine Energy Service Announces Second Quarter 2026 Results
- Nine Energy Service Announces Timing of Second Quarter 2026 Earnings Release and Conference Call
Latest WBI
- Amendment: SEC Form SCHEDULE 13G/A filed by WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC
- WaterBridge Schedules Third Quarter Earnings Release and Conference Call
- SEC Form S-3ASR filed by WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC
- SEC Form S-3ASR filed by WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC
- Piper Sandler resumed coverage on WaterBridge Infrastructure with a new price target
- Director Chase Valerie was granted 4,536 units of Class A Shares, increasing direct ownership by 160% to 7,366 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Carrig Janet was granted 4,536 units of Class A Shares, increasing direct ownership by 70% to 11,036 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Daily Gregory S was granted 4,536 units of Class A Shares, increasing direct ownership by 6% to 86,036 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Crane James R was granted 4,536 units of Class A Shares, increasing direct ownership by 2% to 211,036 units (SEC Form 4)
- Executive VP, CAO Williams Jason Frederick covered exercise/tax liability with 9,182 units of Class A Shares, decreasing direct ownership by 9% to 90,704 units (SEC Form 4) (for tax liability)