Compare · PE vs PTR
PE vs PTR
Side-by-side comparison of Parsley Energy, Inc. (PE) and PetroChina Company Limited (PTR): market cap, price performance, sector, and recent activity on the wire.
Summary
- Both PE and PTR operate in Oil & Gas Production (Energy), so they compete in similar markets.
- PTR carries a market cap of $90.94B.
- PTR has more recent analyst coverage (8 ratings vs 0 for PE).
PetroChina Company Limited
PetroChina Company Limited, together with its subsidiaries, engages in a range of petroleum related products, services, and activities in Mainland China and internationally. It operates through Exploration and Production, Refining and Chemicals, Marketing, and Natural Gas and Pipeline segments. The Exploration and Production segment engages in the exploration, development, production, and marketing of crude oil and natural gas. The Refining and Chemicals segment refines crude oil and petroleum products; and produces and markets primary petrochemical products, derivative petrochemical products, and other chemical products. The Marketing segment is involved in marketing of refined products and trading business. The Natural Gas and Pipeline segment engages in the transmission of natural gas, crude oil, and refined products; and sale of natural gas. As of December 31, 2020, the company had a total length of 31,151 km, including 22,555 km of natural gas pipelines, 7,190 km of crude oil pipelines, and 1,406 km of refined product pipelines. The company is also involved in the exploration, development, and production of oil sands and coalbed methane; trading of crude oil and petrochemical products; storage, chemical engineering, storage facilities, service station, and transportation facilities and related businesses; and production and sales of basic and derivative chemical, and other chemical products. The company was founded in 1999 and is headquartered in Beijing, the People's Republic of China. PetroChina Company Limited is a subsidiary of China National Petroleum Corporation.
Latest PE
- SEC Form SC 13G filed
- SEC Form SC 13G/A filed
- SEC Form SC 13G/A filed
- SEC Form SC 13G/A filed
- SEC Form SC 13G/A filed
- SEC Form SC 13G/A filed
- SEC Form 15-12B filed
- SEC Form 25-NSE filed
- SEC Form 4: Llc Partners, Investment Energy Peak Q-Jagged disposed to the issuer $0 worth of Class A Common Stock (65,436,613 units at $0.00)
- SEC Form 4: Matthew Gallagher disposed to the issuer $0 worth of Class B common stock (1,000,000 units at $0.00), was granted 501,210 units of Class A common stock, disposed of $4,710,146 worth of Class A common stock (287,029 units at $16.41) and disposed to the issuer $0 worth of Class A common stock (1,172,942 units at $0.00), decreasing ownership by 100% to 0 units
Latest PTR
- PetroChina downgraded by Bernstein
- SEC Form 15F-12B filed by PetroChina Company Limited
- SEC Form 6-K filed by PetroChina Company Limited
- SEC Form 6-K filed by PetroChina Company Limited
- SEC Form 6-K filed by PetroChina Company Limited
- SEC Form 6-K filed by PetroChina Company Limited
- SEC Form 6-K filed by PetroChina Company Limited
- SEC Form 6-K filed by PetroChina Company Limited
- SEC Form 6-K filed by PetroChina Company Limited
- SEC Form 6-K filed by PetroChina Company Limited