Document

DEF 14A 1 a2022proxystatement.htm DEF 14A Document

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )


Filed by the Registrant ☒			Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☐

Check the appropriate box:


☐			Preliminary Proxy Statement
☐			Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
☒			Definitive Proxy Statement
☐			Definitive Additional Materials
☐			Soliciting Material under § 240.14a-12

Affirm Holdings, Inc.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

_______________________________________________________________

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check all boxes that apply)

☒

No fee required.

☐

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

☐

Fee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11


NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

To our stockholders:

We are pleased to invite you to virtually attend the 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (including any adjournments, continuations, or postponements thereof, the “Annual Meeting”) of Affirm Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Affirm” or the “Company”). The Annual Meeting will be held exclusively online via live audio webcast at www.proxydocs.com/AFRM on Monday, December 5, 2022, at 9:00 a.m., Pacific Time. The virtual format of the Annual Meeting allows us to preserve and even increase stockholder access, while also saving time and money for both us and our stockholders and safeguarding the health of participants. Even with a virtual format, you will still be able to vote and submit questions during the meeting, and we encourage you to attend online and participate.

The Annual Meeting will be held for the following purposes:

1. To elect the three Class II nominees for director named in the accompanying proxy statement to hold office until the 2025 Annual Meeting and until their successors have been duly elected and qualified or until such director’s earlier death, resignation or removal.

2. To ratify the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2023.

3. To conduct any other business properly brought before the Annual Meeting.

These proposals, as well as instructions for accessing the virtual Annual Meeting, are more fully described in the accompanying proxy statement. The record date for the Annual Meeting is October 6, 2022. Only stockholders of record at the close of business on that date are entitled to notice of, and may vote at, the Annual Meeting.

By Order of the Board of Directors



Katherine Adkins Chief Legal Officer & Secretary

San Francisco, California October 21, 2022

Important notice regarding the availability of proxy materials for Affirm’s 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on December 5, 2022: The notice, proxy statement and annual report are available at www.proxydocs.com/AFRM.

WHETHER OR NOT YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING, WE ENCOURAGE YOU TO VOTE AND SUBMIT YOUR PROXY THROUGH THE INTERNET OR BY TELEPHONE OR REQUEST AND SUBMIT YOUR PROXY CARD AS SOON AS POSSIBLE, SO THAT YOUR SHARES MAY BE REPRESENTED AT THE MEETING.

TABLE OF CONTENTS



						Page


QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING						1
BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE						5
Director Nominees						6
Continuing Directors						7
Director Independence						8
Board Leadership Structure						9
Board and Stockholder Meetings and Committees						9
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation						11
Individual Board Skills Matrix						11
Board Diversity						12
Considerations in Evaluating Director Nominees						13
Stockholder Recommendations for Nominations to the Board of Directors						13
Investor Outreach						13
Communications with the Board of Directors						13
Corporate Governance Guidelines and Code of Ethics and Business Conduct						13
Role of the Board in Risk Oversight						14
Non-Employee Director Compensation						14
PROPOSAL NO. 1 : ELECTION OF DIRECTORS						16
PROPOSAL NO. 2: RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM						17
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT						19
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS						20
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION						21
Compensation Discussion and Analysis						21
Compensation Committee Report						36
Executive Compensation Tables						37
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION						45
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT						46
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS						48
OTHER MATTERS						49
PROPOSALS OF STOCKHOLDERS FOR 202 3 ANNUAL MEETING						50
APPENDIX A						51

Headquarters | 650 California Street, San Francisco, California 94108 | (415) 984-0490
Investor Relations Website | investors.affirm.com

PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2022
ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

To Be Held at 9:00 a.m., Pacific Time, on Monday, December 5, 2022

This proxy statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation of your proxy by our Board of Directors (“Board”) to vote at the 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (including any adjournments, continuations, or postponements thereof, the “Annual Meeting”). This proxy statement contains information about the matters to be voted upon at the Annual Meeting and certain other information required by Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) rules. In accordance with SEC rules, we are making our proxy materials available at www.proxydocs.com/AFRM with an option to request a printed set be mailed to you. We expect to begin mailing a notice of internet availability of proxy materials (the “Notice”) on October 21, 2022 to all stockholders of record entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. The Notice contains instructions for viewing the proxy materials, voting online and requesting a printed set of proxy materials.

You are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting on Monday, December 5, 2022, at 9:00 a.m., Pacific Time, which we are holding exclusively online via live webcast at www.proxydocs.com/AFRM. Whether or not you expect to attend the Annual Meeting, please vote online, as instructed in these materials, as promptly as possible in order to ensure your representation at the Annual Meeting. Even if you have voted by proxy, you may still vote online during the Annual Meeting by following the instructions under “Voting and Annual Meeting Information”.

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING

The information provided in the “question and answer” format below addresses certain frequently asked questions but is not intended to be a summary of all matters contained in this proxy statement. Please read the entire proxy statement carefully before voting your shares.


Why am I receiving these materials?

You are receiving this proxy statement because our Board is soliciting your proxy to vote your shares at the Annual Meeting with respect to the proposals described in this proxy statement. This proxy statement includes

information that we are required to provide to you pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC and is designed to assist you in voting your shares.


Who is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting?

Holders of either our Class A common stock or Class B common stock as of the close of business on October 6, 2022, the record date for the Annual Meeting (the “Record Date”), are entitled to vote at the Annual

Meeting. As of the Record Date, there were 229,992,020 shares of Class A common stock and 60,103,654 shares of Class B common stock outstanding and entitled to vote.


How many votes per share do I have?

Our Class A common stock has one vote per share and our Class B common stock has fifteen votes per share. Our Class A and Class B common stock will vote together as a

single class on all matters to be voted upon at the Annual Meeting.


How can I vote?

Your voting options depend on how you hold your shares. If your shares are held in an account by a broker, bank or other agent acting as a nominee, then you are the beneficial owner of shares held in “street-name,” and the proxy materials were forwarded to you by that organization. As a street-name holder, you have the right to instruct that organization on how to vote the shares held in your account at the Annual Meeting. To do so, you should follow the voting instructions you receive from your broker, bank or other agent. If you are the stockholder of record, you may vote as follows:

•By mail, by completing, signing and dating the enclosed proxy card and returning it promptly in the envelope provided.

•By telephone, by calling (866) 230-8413 and following

the recorded instructions.

•Online, by going to www.proxypush.com/AFRM and following the prompts.

•At the Annual Meeting, by following the log in procedures described above and completing the online form during the Annual Meeting.

You can vote over the phone or online until 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on the day before the Annual Meeting. If you vote by mail, your proxy or voting instruction card, as applicable, must be received by the day before the Annual Meeting. You may still attend and vote at the Annual Meeting online even if you have already voted by proxy.


How can I change my vote?

You can revoke your proxy at any time before the final vote at the Annual Meeting. If you are the beneficial owner, please follow the instructions provided by the broker, bank or other agent through which your shares are held. If you are the stockholder of record, you can change your vote or revoke your proxy by submitting a subsequent proxy or by sending a timely written notice that you are revoking your proxy to the Corporate

Secretary at the Company’s address (see the first page of this proxy statement). Such notice will be considered timely if it is received by the day before the Annual Meeting. You can also change your vote by attending and voting at the Annual Meeting online. Please note that simply attending the Annual Meeting will not, by itself, revoke your proxy.


Who will count the votes?

Votes will be counted by the inspector of election appointed for the Annual Meeting by our Board.


What if I am a record holder and I do not submit voting instructions?

If you complete and submit your proxy, the persons named as proxies will vote your shares in accordance with your instructions. If you submit a proxy but do not complete the voting instructions, the persons named as proxies will vote your shares in accordance with the

Board’s recommendations below. If you do not submit a proxy or vote at the Annual Meeting, your shares will not be voted.


What if I am a street-name holder and I do not submit voting instructions?

You may instruct your broker, bank or other agent on how to vote your shares by following the instructions they provided with the proxy materials. If you do not do so, the firm has discretion to vote your shares only with respect to proposals that are considered “routine” matters. If you do not provide instructions for any proposal that is

determined to not be “routine,” the firm that holds your shares will not have discretionary authority to vote your shares for any such proposal. This is called a “broker non-vote.” Therefore, you are encouraged to return your voting instructions so that your shares are voted at the Annual Meeting.


What vote is necessary to approve each proposal and what are the board’s recommendations?

The following table sets forth the voting requirements for each proposal being voted on at the Annual Meeting and

the board’s recommendations.

Proposal

Board
Recommendation

Required
Vote

Effect of

Withholding /
Abstentions

Broker Non-
Votes

Election of directors

For each nominee

Plurality of votes cast (nominees that receive the most FOR votes will be elected)

No effect

Not counted as entitled to vote and so no effect

Ratification of selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP

For

Majority of the voting power of the shares represented at the meeting and entitled to vote on the matter

Same as a vote AGAINST

Not counted as entitled to vote and so no effect, if any


What if other business comes before the Annual Meeting?

We do not expect any other business to properly come before the Annual Meeting; however, if any other business should properly come before the Annual Meeting, the persons named as proxies will vote your shares on such matters in accordance with their best judgment. Each nominee has consented to be a candidate and to serve if elected. Although the Board has no reason

to believe that any nominee will be unavailable to serve as a director, if such an event should occur, the Board may designate a substitute nominee or reduce the size of the Board. If the board designates a substitute nominee, proxies will be voted for such substitute nominee(s).


Do I have to do anything in advance if I plan to attend the Annual Meeting?

The Annual Meeting will be a virtual audio meeting of stockholders, which will be conducted via live audio webcast. You are entitled to participate in the Annual Meeting only if you were a holder of our common stock as of the close of business on the Record Date or if you hold

a valid proxy for the Annual Meeting.

You will be able to attend the Annual Meeting and submit your questions during the Annual Meeting by visiting www.proxydocs.com/AFRM. You also will be able to vote

your shares electronically at the Annual Meeting.

To participate in the Annual Meeting, you will need the control number included on your Notice or proxy card. The live audio webcast will begin promptly at 9:00 a.m.,

Pacific Time. We encourage you to access the meeting prior to the start time. Online check-in will begin at 8:45 a.m., Pacific Time, and you should allow ample time for the check-in procedures.


How can I submit a question during the Annual Meeting?

Stockholders are permitted to submit questions during the Annual Meeting via www.proxydocs.com/AFRM. We will answer as many questions submitted in accordance with

the meeting rules of conduct as possible in the time allotted for the meeting.


How can I get help if I have trouble checking in or listening to the meeting online?

If you encounter any difficulties accessing the virtual meeting during the check-in or meeting time, please call the technical support number that will be posted on the

Virtual Stockholder Meeting log-in page.


What is the effect of giving a proxy?

Proxies are solicited by and on behalf of our Board. The persons named in the proxy have been designated as proxy holders by our Board. When a proxy is properly dated, executed and returned, the shares represented by the proxy will be voted at the Annual Meeting in accordance with the instructions of the stockholder. If no specific instructions are given, however, the shares will be voted in accordance with the recommendations of our

Board. If any matters not described in this proxy statement are properly presented at the Annual Meeting, the proxy holders will use their own judgment to determine how to vote your shares. If the Annual Meeting is postponed or adjourned, the proxy holders can vote your shares on the new meeting date, unless you have properly revoked your proxy, as described above.


Who pays the cost of the proxy solicitation?

We will pay for the costs of soliciting proxies, including the preparation, assembly, printing and mailing of the proxy materials. In addition, our directors, officers and employees may also solicit proxies in person, by telephone, or by other means of communication, without

additional compensation. We may also reimburse brokers, banks, fiduciaries, custodians and other institutions for their costs in forwarding the proxy materials to the street-name holders of our common stock.


What is a quorum?

A quorum is the minimum number of shares required to be present at the Annual Meeting for the meeting to be properly held under our bylaws and Delaware law. The presence (including by proxy) of a majority of the voting power of the shares of capital stock issued and outstanding and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting

will constitute a quorum at the Annual Meeting. If there is no quorum, the chairperson of the meeting or a majority of the shares present at the Annual Meeting may adjourn the meeting to a later date.


What does it mean if I received more than one Notice?

If you receive more than one Notice, you hold shares that may be registered in more than one name or in different accounts. Please follow the voting instructions on each

Notice to ensure that all of your shares are voted.


I share an address with another stockholder, and we received only one paper copy of the proxy materials. How may I obtain an additional copy of the proxy materials?

We have adopted an SEC-approved procedure called “householding.” Under this procedure, we will deliver only one copy of our Notice, and for those stockholders that received a paper copy of proxy materials in the mail, one copy of our annual report to stockholders and this proxy statement, to multiple stockholders who share the same address (if they appear to be members of the same family) unless we have received contrary instructions from an affected stockholder. Stockholders who participate in householding will continue to receive separate proxy cards if they received a paper copy of proxy materials in the mail. This procedure reduces our printing and mailing costs. Upon written or oral request, we will promptly deliver a separate copy of the Notice, proxy materials and annual report to any stockholder at a shared address to which we delivered a single copy of any of these

documents. To receive a separate copy, or, if you are receiving multiple copies, to request that we only send a single copy of next year’s proxy materials and annual report, you may contact us as follows:

Affirm Holdings, Inc.

Attention: Secretary

650 California Street

San Francisco, California 94108

(415) 984-0490

Stockholders who hold shares in street-name may contact their brokerage firm, bank, broker-dealer or other nominee to request information about householding.


How can I sign up to receive future proxy materials by e-mail?

We encourage stockholders to take advantage of electronic delivery to help reduce the cost and environmental impact of the Annual Meeting. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above for voting online and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years. Also, if you are a beneficial

owner, you may sign up for electronic delivery by contacting your bank, broker or other agent through which you hold your shares. Once you sign up, you will not receive a printed copy of the proxy materials unless you request them.


How can I find out the results of the voting at the Annual Meeting?

We will announce the preliminary voting results at the Annual Meeting. Final voting results will tallied by the inspector of elections and will be published in the

Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K that we expect to file within four business days after the Annual Meeting.

Board of Directors and Corporate Governance

Our business is managed under the direction of our Board, which is currently composed of nine members. Seven of our nine directors are independent within the meaning of the independent director requirements of the Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (“Nasdaq”). Our Board is divided into three classes with staggered three-year terms. At each Annual Meeting of stockholders, a class of directors will be elected for a three-year term to succeed the same class whose term is then expiring.

Upon the recommendation of our Nominating and Governance Committee, we are nominating Jenny J. Ming, Christa S. Quarles, and Keith Rabois as Class II directors at

the Annual Meeting. If elected, Ms. Ming, Ms. Quarles, and Mr. Rabois will each hold office for a three-year term until the Annual Meeting of stockholders to be held in 2025 and until their successors are elected and qualified or until such director’s earlier death, resignation or removal.

The following table sets forth the names, ages as of October 1, 2022 and certain other information for each of the directors with terms expiring at the Annual Meeting and for each of the continuing directors:


Name	Class	Age	Director since	Term Expires	Principal Occupation	Our Committee Membership
Max Levchin	III	47	2012	2023	Founder, CEO and Chairman of Affirm Holdings, Inc.	—
Jeremy Liew	III	51	2013	2023	Partner at Lightspeed Venture Partners	Compensation Committee (chair), Nominating and Governance Committee
Libor Michalek	I	49	2021	2024	President, Technology, Risk and Operations of Affirm Holdings, Inc.	—
Jenny J. Ming	II	67	2021	2022	Executive Coach with ExCo Leadership Development	Audit Committee, Nominating and Governance Committee
Christa S. Quarles	II	48	2018	2022	Chief Executive Officer of Alludo	Audit Committee (chair), Compensation Committee
Keith Rabois	II	53	2013	2022	General Partner at Founders Fund; Chief Executive Officer of Miami Labs, Inc.	Audit Committee
Jacqueline D. Reses	I	52	2021	2024	Chief Executive Officer of Lead Bank	Compensation Committee
Noel Watson	I	47	2022	2024	Chief Financial Officer of LegalZoom.com, Inc.	Audit Committee
James D. White*	III	61	2021	2023	Executive Chairman of Air Protein, Inc.	Compensation Committee, Nominating and Governance Committee (chair)

*Lead Independent Director

Director Nominees - Class II


			Jenny J. Ming has served as a member of our Board since February 2021. Ms. Ming has served as an Executive Coach with ExCo Leadership Development since 2021. Previously, Ms. Ming was Chief Executive Officer of Charlotte Russe from October 2009 to February 2019, a fast fashion specialty retailer of apparel and accessories catering to young women. In February 2019, Charlotte Russe filed a voluntary petition under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. From March 1999 to October 2006, Ms. Ming served as President of Old Navy, a brand in The Gap Inc.’s portfolio, where she oversaw all aspects of Old Navy and its retail clothing stores in the U.S. and Canada. Ms. Ming joined Gap Inc. in 1986, serving in various executive roles for the Gap brand. In 1994, she was a member of the executive team that launched Old Navy. Ms. Ming has served on the board of directors of Levi Strauss & Co since 2014 and Poshmark since 2019. She holds a B.A. in Fashion Merchandising/Marketing from San Jose State University and has been on the Tower Foundation board since 2010. Ms. Ming was selected to serve on our Board due to her experience serving as a director of a public company and her experience as a retail executive and co-founder of the Old Navy brand.
			Christa S. Quarles has served as a member of our Board since 2018. Ms. Quarles is currently the Chief Executive Officer and a Board Director of Alludo, a private software company backed by KKR. Prior to joining Alludo, Ms. Quarles served as Operating Partner of Advent International from 2019 to 2020 and the Chief Executive Officer of OpenTable, Inc., an online restaurant reservation service, from 2015 to 2018. Before OpenTable, Ms. Quarles served as the Chief Business Officer of NextDoor, Inc., a social networking company, from 2014 to 2015. Leading up to NextDoor, Ms. Quarles held positions of increasing responsibility with The Walt Disney Company, including Senior Vice President and General Manager as well as Chief Financial Officer and Head of Business Operations for their Mobile and Social Games division. She came to Disney via its acquisition of Playdom Inc., where she had been its Chief Financial Officer. Ms. Quarles is a member of the board of directors of Kimberly-Clark Corporation, where she has also served as a member of the audit committee since 2016. Ms. Quarles earned her B.S. from Carnegie Mellon University, where she was elected to Phi Beta Kappa, and a M.B.A. from Harvard University. Ms. Quarles was selected to serve on our Board due to her financial expertise, her experience on a public company audit committee, and her leadership experience as the Chief Executive Officer of an e-commerce marketplace.
			Keith Rabois has served as a member of our Board since 2013. Mr. Rabois has been a General Partner at Founders Fund since 2019 and has served as Chief Executive Officer of Miami Labs, Inc. since 2021. Prior to joining Founders Fund, Mr. Rabois served as a Managing Director at Khosla Ventures from 2013 to 2019. Mr. Rabois also served as the Chief Operating Officer of Square, an Executive Vice President of Strategy & Business Development at Slide, and as Vice President of Business & Corporate Development at LinkedIn. Mr. Rabois began his career in the industry as a senior executive at PayPal and has also practiced as an attorney at Sullivan & Cromwell. Mr. Rabois earned his B.A. in Political Science from Stanford University and his J.D. from Harvard University. Mr. Rabois was selected to serve on our Board due to his experience as an executive of a payment processing platform, his experience as a venture capitalist, and his legal background.

Directors Continuing in Office - Class I (Term Ending in 2024)


			Libor Michalek has served as a member of our Board since May 2021. Mr. Michalek has served as our President, Technology, Risk and Operations since May 2021 and previously served as our President, Technology from 2018 to May 2021. Mr. Michalek served as the Company’s Chief Technology Officer from 2015 to 2018. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Michalek served as an Engineering Director at YouTube and Google. Prior to that, Mr. Michalek served as the Chief Technology Officer of Slide, a personal media-sharing service, which was acquired by Google in 2010. Mr. Michalek has also served in management positions at Topspin, Egroups, Talarian, Thinking Machines Corporation, and the National Center for Supercomputing Applications. Mr. Michalek earned his B.S. in Computer Science from University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Mr. Michalek was selected to serve on our Board due to his deep software, systems, security, machine learning, and engineering experience.
			Jacqueline D. Reses has served as a member of our Board since January 2021. Ms. Reses has served as the Chief Executive Officer of Lead Bank since 2021. From October 2015 to October 2020, Ms. Reses served as Square Capital Lead of Block, Inc., a financial services and technology company, and Executive Chairman of its bank, Square Financial Services. From September 2012 to October 2015, Ms. Reses served as Chief Development Officer of Yahoo! Inc. Prior to Yahoo, Ms. Reses served as the head of the U.S. media group at Apax Partners Worldwide LLP, which she joined in 2001. Ms. Reses also spent seven years at Goldman Sachs in mergers and acquisitions and the principal investment area. Ms. Reses is currently on the board of directors of Endeavor Group Holdings Inc., Nu Holdings Ltd. and TaskUS, Inc. She previously served as Executive Chair of ContextLogic Inc. and on the board of directors of Pershing Square Tontine Holdings, Ltd., Alibaba Group Holdings Limited, Social Capital Hedosophia Holdings Corp. and Social Capital Hedosophia III. Ms. Reses is also the Chair of the Economic Advisory Council of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco and sits on the Wharton School Board of Advisors. Ms. Reses received a bachelor’s degree in economics with honors from the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania. Ms. Reses was selected to serve on our Board due to her experience as a director of various public companies and her leadership experience at technology companies.
			Noel Watson has served as a member of our Board since September 2022. Mr. Watson has served as the Chief Financial Officer of LegalZoom, an online platform for legal and compliance solutions, since November 2020. Prior to joining LegalZoom, Mr. Watson served as Chief Financial Officer at TrueCar, Inc from June 2019 to November 2020. From April 2006 to June 2019, Mr. Watson served in roles of increasing responsibility at TripAdvisor, Inc., including as Vice President - Finance and Chief Accounting Officer. Mr. Watson previously served as member of the Board of Directors and Chair of the Audit Committee of Zynga Inc. Mr. Watson holds a B.S. in accounting from Bryant University. Mr. Watson was selected to serve on our Board due to his financial expertise and his experience on a public company audit committee.

Directors Continuing in Office - Class III (Term Ending in 2023)


			Max Levchin is our Founder and has served as our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) since our founding in 2012. Affirm was spun out of 2012 MRL Investments LLC (f/k/a HVF, LLC) (“HVF”), an exploration company Mr. Levchin founded in 2011 to create and fund companies that leveraged large data sets in new ways. At HVF, Mr. Levchin also founded Glow, a women’s health company, where he remains on the board of directors. Prior to HVF, Mr. Levchin founded and was Chief Executive Officer of Slide, a personal media-sharing service. Slide was acquired by Google in 2010. Slide was created at MRL Ventures Inc. (“MRL”), an earlier exploration company Mr. Levchin founded in 2004, to create and fund companies that leveraged the emergence of social media. At MRL, Mr. Levchin also helped create Yelp Inc., a consumer internet company, where he served as chairman of its board of directors from its founding in 2005 until July 2015. Prior to MRL, Mr. Levchin co-founded PayPal, where he served as Chief Technology Officer from its founding until its sale to eBay in 2003. Mr. Levchin also served on the board for Yahoo! Inc., an internet company, from 2012 until 2015. Mr. Levchin was born in Kiev, Ukraine before moving to the United States and settling in Chicago in 1991. Mr. Levchin holds a B.S. in Computer Science from University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, where he founded and led four other technology startups. Mr. Levchin was selected to serve on our Board because of the perspective and experience he brings as our Founder and CEO, as well as his experience as a founder of several technology companies.
			Jeremy Liew has served as a member of our Board since 2013. Mr. Liew has been a Partner at Lightspeed Venture Partners, a venture capital firm, since 2006. Prior to joining Lightspeed, Mr. Liew was an executive at Netscape, AOL, Citysearch and IAC. Mr. Liew served on the board of The Honest Company, Inc. from 2011 to 2022. Mr. Liew graduated with honors with a BSc in mathematics, and a BA in Linguistics, from the Australian National University, and with an M.B.A. from Stanford Business School. Mr. Liew was selected to serve on our Board because of his substantial experience in overseeing multiple technology investments and his previous experience as a technology executive.
			James D. White has served as a member of our Board since February 2021 and as our Lead Independent Director since September 2021. Mr. White has served as Executive Chairman of Air Protein, Inc. since 2020. Mr. White served for eight years, from 2008 to 2016, as the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Jamba Inc. Prior to that, from 2005 to 2008, Mr. White was Senior Vice President and General Manager of Safeway, Inc., a U.S. supermarket chain. From 1983 to 2005 Mr. White held management roles at Gillette, Nestle Purina and Coca-Cola. Additionally, Mr. White currently serves on the board of directors of Adtalem Global Education, Panera Bread Company-JAB Holdings and Schnucks. He previously served on the board of directors of Bradshaw Home, CallidusCloud, Daymon Worldwide, Hillshire Brands and Keane Inc. His non- profit board experience includes Directors Academy, where he is a founding member and currently Board Chairman, as well as Board Chairman for Fair Trade USA. He previously served on the non-profit boards of the NASDAQ Entrepreneurial Center, The Organic Center and the Network of Executive Women. Mr. White received a B.S. degree, with a major in marketing, from The University of Missouri and an MBA from Fontbonne University. He is also a graduate of the Cornell University Food Executive Program and was a Stanford University Distinguished Careers Institute Fellow in 2018. Mr. White was selected to serve on our Board due to his experience as a public company director and his experience as an executive.

Director Independence

Our Class A common stock is listed on Nasdaq. Under the listing standards of Nasdaq, independent directors must comprise a majority of a listed company’s board of directors within a specified period after the completion of

its initial public offering. In addition, the listing standards of Nasdaq require that, subject to specified exceptions, each member of a listed company’s audit, compensation and nominating and governance committees be

independent. Audit committee members and compensation committee members must also satisfy the independence criteria set forth in Rule 10A-3 and Rule 10C-1, respectively, under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Under the listing standards of Nasdaq, a director will only qualify as an “independent director” if, in the opinion of that company’s board of directors, that person does not have a relationship that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director.

Our Board has undertaken a review of the independence of each director and has determined that each of Mses. Ming, Quarles and Reses and Messrs. Liew, Rabois, Watson and White is “independent” as that term is

defined under the listing standards of Nasdaq. Our Board also determined that Jeremy G. Philips, who did not stand for re-election at our 2021 annual meeting, was independent during the time that he served as a director. In making these determinations, our Board considered the current and prior relationships that each non-employee director has with our Company and all other facts and circumstances our Board deemed relevant in determining their independence, including the beneficial ownership of our capital stock by each non-employee director, and the transactions involving them described in the section titled “Certain Relationships and Related-Party Transactions.”

There are no family relationships among any of our directors or executive officers.

Board Leadership Structure

Mr. Levchin, our Founder and CEO, serves as Chairman of our Board and presides over meetings of our Board, holds such other powers, and carries out such other duties as are customarily carried out by the chair of a board. Our independent directors bring experience, oversight, and expertise from outside of our company, while Messrs. Levchin and Michalek each bring current company-specific experience, leadership, and insight as our Founder and Chief Executive Officer and President, Technology, Risk and Operations, respectively.

Our Board has adopted corporate governance guidelines that provide that one of our independent directors may serve as our Lead Independent Director if the Chair is not independent. Our Board has appointed Mr. White to serve

as our Lead Independent Director. As Lead Independent Director, Mr. White presides over periodic meetings of our independent directors, serves as a liaison between our Chair and our independent directors, and performs such additional duties as our Board may otherwise determine and delegate. Our Board believes that our existing board leadership structure is appropriate and provides independent leadership and engagement from the Lead Independent Director, while providing the benefit of having our CEO, the individual with primary responsibility for managing the company’s day-to-day operations, chair regular Board meetings as key business and strategic issues are discussed.

Board and Stockholder Meetings and Committees

Our Board has established three standing committees: an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee, and a Nominating and Governance Committee. Each of our standing committees operates under a written charter that complies with the applicable requirements of the Nasdaq listing standards and the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC. Each of the charters is posted on the “Corporate Governance” section of our investor relations website at investors.affirm.com/corporate-governance/governance-overview.

During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 (“fiscal 2022”), our Board held eight meetings (including regularly scheduled and special meetings), our Audit Committee met eight times, our Compensation Committee met seven times, and our Nominating and Governance Committee

met five times. Each director attended at least 75% of the aggregate of (i) the total number of meetings of our Board held during the period for which he or she served as a director and (ii) the total number of meetings held by all committees of our Board on which he or she served during the periods that he or she served.

Although we do not have a formal policy regarding attendance by members of our Board at annual meetings of stockholders, we encourage, but do not require, our directors to attend. All of our then current serving directors attended last year’s annual meeting of stockholders.


Audit Committee Members: Christa S. Quarles Jenny J. Ming Keith Rabois Noel Watson			Our Audit Committee is responsible for, among other things: –selecting a qualified firm to serve as the independent registered public accounting firm to audit our financial statements; –evaluating the independence and overseeing performance of the independent registered public accounting firm; –reviewing and discussing the scope and results of the audit with the independent registered public accounting firm, and reviewing, with management and the independent registered public accounting firm, our interim and year-end operating results; –reviewing our financial statements and our critical accounting policies; –reviewing, approving, or ratifying related party transactions; –reviewing the adequacy and effectiveness of our accounting and internal controls; –discussing our major litigation and financial risk exposures and the steps our management has taken to monitor and control these exposures, including guidelines and policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management; –developing and overseeing procedures for employees to submit concerns anonymously about questionable accounting or auditing matters; –overseeing the integrity of our information technology systems, processes and data as well as related cybersecurity matters; –reviewing our program to monitor compliance with our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct; and –pre-approving all audit and all permissible non-audit services, other than de minimis non-audit services, to be performed by the independent registered public accounting firm. Each member of our Audit Committee meets the requirements for independence under the listing standards of Nasdaq and the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC. Each member of our Audit Committee also meets the financial literacy and sophistication requirements of the listing standards of Nasdaq. In addition, our Board has determined that Ms. Quarles and Mr. Watson are audit committee financial experts within the meaning of Item 407(d) of Regulation S-K under the Securities Act of 1933.
Compensation Committee Members: Jeremy Liew Christa S. Quarles Jacqueline D. Reses James D. White			Our Compensation Committee is responsible for, among other things: –reviewing, approving and determining, or making recommendations to our Board regarding, the compensation of our executive officers; –evaluating annually the performance of our CEO and making recommendations to the independent directors regarding the CEO’s compensation; –administering our equity compensation plans; –reviewing and approving and making recommendations to our Board regarding incentive compensation and equity compensation plans; –developing and making recommendations to our Board regarding succession planning for our CEO, together with the Nominating and Governance Committee, and other senior management positions; –establishing and reviewing general policies relating to compensation and benefits of our employees; –making recommendations regarding non-employee director compensation to our full Board; and –reviewing our key diversity initiatives, policies and practices. Each of the members of our Compensation Committee meets the requirements for independence under the listing standards of Nasdaq and the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC. Each member of the Compensation Committee is also a non-employee director, as defined pursuant to Rule 16b-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act.


Nominating and Governance Committee: Members: James D. White Jeremy Liew Jenny J. Ming			Our Nominating and Governance Committee is responsible for, among other things: –identifying, evaluating and selecting, or making recommendations to our Board regarding, nominees for election to our Board and its committees; –evaluating the performance of our Board; –considering and making recommendations to our Board regarding the composition of our Board and its committees; –recommending to the independent directors an independent director to serve as Lead Independent Director; –developing, reviewing, or making recommendations to our Board regarding corporate governance principles; –together with the Compensation Committee, developing and making recommendations to our Board regarding succession planning for our CEO; and –oversee and periodically review our environmental, social and governance ("ESG") activities, programs and public disclosure. Each of the members of our Nominating and Governance Committee meets the requirements for independence under the listing standards of Nasdaq.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

None of the members of our Compensation Committee is or has been an officer or employee of our Company. None of our executive officers currently serves, or in the past year has served, as a member of the board of directors or

compensation committee (or other board committee performing equivalent functions) of any entity that has one or more executive officers serving on our Board or Compensation Committee.

Individual Board Skills Matrix

The Board is committed to ensuring it has a relevant diversity of skills and experience to oversee the Company, its management, its strategic plan and the execution of that plan. The Board believes that our director nominees, as a group, represent an effective mix of skills, experience, diversity and fresh perspectives. The following table

summarizes the key skills, experience, diversity and other qualifications of our directors. The director biographies beginning on page 6 describe each director’s background and relevant experience in more detail.

Experience, Expertise or Other Qualifications

Levchin

Liew

Michalek

Ming

Quarles

Rabois

Reses

Watson

White

Payments, Financial Services, FinTech

Engineering, Technology, Innovation

Current/Former CEO

Current/Former CFO

Audit Committee Financial Expert

Financial Expertise

Operational Experience

Business Development/M&A

Venture Capital/Private Equity

Sales

Marketing, Brand

Bank Regulatory

Legal, Government Relations

International, Global

Cybersecurity

Risk Management

Human Capital

Government/Public Service

Academia

Public Company Audit Committee

Public Company Compensation Committee

Public Company Nominating/Governance Committee

Board Diversity

The following matrix presents the gender and demographic diversity of our board:


Board Diversity Matrix as of October 21, 2022
Total Number of Directors: 9
	Female	Male	Non-Binary	Did Not Disclose Gender
Part I: Gender Identity
Directors	3	6	—	—
Part II: Demographic Background
African American or Black	—	2	—	—
Alaskan Native or Native American	—	—	—	—
Asian	1	1	—	—
Hispanic or Latinx	—	—	—	—
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander	—	—	—	—
White	2	3	—	—
Two or More Races or Ethnicities	—	—	—	—
LGBTQ+	—	1	—	—
Did Not Disclose Demographic Background	—	—	—	—

Considerations in Evaluating Director Nominees

Our Nominating and Governance Committee uses a variety of methods for identifying and evaluating potential director candidates. In its evaluation of director candidates, including the current directors eligible for re-election, our Nominating and Governance Committee will consider the current size and composition of our Board and the needs of our Board and the respective committees of our Board. Some of the qualifications that our Nominating and Governance Committee considers include, without limitation, experience of particular relevance to us and the Board, accomplishments, superior credentials, independence, area of expertise, and the highest ethical and moral standards. Although our Board does not maintain a specific policy with respect to board

diversity, our Board believes that the board should be a diverse body, and the Nominating and Governance Committee considers a broad range of backgrounds and experiences. In making determinations regarding nominations of directors, the Nominating and Governance Committee may take into account the benefits of diverse viewpoints. Any search firm retained by our Nominating and Governance Committee to find director candidates would be instructed to take into account all of the considerations used by our Nominating and Governance Committee. After completing its review and evaluation of director candidates, our Nominating and Governance Committee recommends to our full Board the director nominees for selection.

Stockholder Recommendations for Nominations to the Board of Directors

The Nominating and Governance Committee considers director candidates recommended by stockholders. Stockholders may recommend a candidate by writing to the Corporate Secretary at the Company’s address listed on the first page of this proxy statement, and including all information that our bylaws require for director

nominations. The Nominating and Governance Committee evaluates director candidates submitted by stockholders in the same manner in which it evaluates other director candidates.

Investor Outreach

We seek regular engagement with investors to communicate our strategy and solicit feedback from the investment community. Management periodically engages a third-party consultant to obtain independent feedback from our investors. In fiscal 2022, management participated in a number of investor conferences and meetings, both virtual and in-person. These meetings were attended by various members of the Company’s senior management, including our Chief Executive Officer,

Chief Financial Officer, and/or Senior Vice Presidents. Management periodically discusses feedback, including key themes and other insights gained from the investor outreach meetings, at the Company’s Board and committee meetings, as appropriate. Our Board of Directors, as well as our management team, values the perspectives of our investors as it helps us to understand and evaluate the effectiveness of our investor communications.

Communications with the Board of Directors

Interested parties wishing to communicate with our independent directors may do so by writing to the Board or to the particular member or members of our Board and mailing the correspondence to our Chief Legal Officer at the Company’s address listed on the first page of this proxy statement. Our Chief Legal Officer or Legal

Department, in consultation with appropriate members of our Board, as necessary, will review all incoming communications and, if appropriate, all such communications will be forwarded to the appropriate member or members of our Board, or if none is specified, to the Chairman of our Board.

Corporate Governance Guidelines and Code of Ethics and Business Conduct

Our Board has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines. These guidelines address items such as the qualifications and responsibilities of our directors and director

candidates and corporate governance policies and standards applicable to us in general. In addition, our Board has adopted a Code of Ethics and Business Conduct

that applies to all of our employees, officers and directors, including our CEO, Chief Financial Officer, and other executive and senior financial officers. The full text of our Corporate Governance Guidelines and our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct is posted on our investor relations

webpage at investors.affirm.com in the “Corporate Governance” section. We intend to post any amendments to our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct, and any waivers of our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct for directors and executive officers, on the same website.

Role of the Board in Risk Oversight

One of the key functions of our Board is informed oversight of our risk management process which risks include, among others, strategic, financial, business and operational, cybersecurity, legal and regulatory compliance, and reputational risks. Our Board does not have a standing risk management committee, but rather administers this oversight function directly through the Board as a whole, as well as through its standing committees that address risks inherent in their respective areas of oversight. In particular, our Board is responsible for monitoring and assessing strategic risk exposure. Our Audit Committee is responsible for discussing our major litigation and financial risk exposures and the steps our management has taken to monitor and control these exposures, including guidelines and policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management. In addition to

oversight of the performance of our external audit function, our Audit Committee also monitors compliance with legal and regulatory requirements and reviews related party transactions. Our Nominating and Governance Committee develops and reviews our Corporate Governance Guidelines and oversees our ESG activities and programs. Our Compensation Committee reviews with management our compensation arrangements to evaluate whether any of our compensation policies and programs has the potential to encourage excessive risk-taking and reviews the relationship between risk management policies and practice, corporate strategy and our compensation arrangements.

Non-Employee Director Compensation

Our Board maintains a compensation policy for our non-employee directors (the “director compensation policy”) pursuant to which our non-employee directors receive the compensation described in the table below. The director compensation policy was developed with input from the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation

consultant, Compensia, Inc., regarding practices and compensation levels at comparable companies. The director compensation policy is designed to attract, retain and reward our non-employee directors.


Cash Compensation(1)
Annual retainer		$45,000
Lead Independent Director retainer		$28,000
Additional annual retainers for committee service	Chair	Member
Audit Committee	$25,000	$12,500
Compensation Committee	$18,000	$9,000
Nominating and Governance Committee	$10,000	$5,000
Equity Compensation(2)
Initial grant of RSUs(3)		$500,000
Annual grant of RSUs(4)		$200,000

(1)Paid in quarterly installments in arrears and pro-rated for directors whose service commences during the year.

(2)Amounts represent the approximate grant date fair value of RSUs that will be settled in shares of our Class A common stock. All equity awards granted pursuant to the director compensation policy vest, in addition to the schedules below, upon a change in control of the Company.

(3)Award vests, subject to the director’s continued service, in equal annual installments on the first three anniversaries of the director’s commencement of service.

(4)Award vests, subject to the director’s continued service, in full on the earlier of (i) the date of our next annual meeting of our stockholders (or the date immediately prior to our next annual meeting of our stockholders if the non-employee director’s service as a director ends at such meeting due to the director’s failure to be re-elected or the director not standing for re-election); or (ii) the first anniversary of the date of grant.

We reimburse each non-employee director for ordinary, necessary, and reasonable out-of-pocket travel expenses to cover in-person attendance at and participation in meetings of our Board and any committee of the Board. Our directors who are also employees, Messrs. Levchin and Michalek, do not receive any additional compensation

for their services as a director. The following table sets forth information regarding compensation earned by or paid to our non-employee directors during fiscal 2022. Mr. Watson was not a director during fiscal 2022 and, therefore, did not receive any non-employee director compensation in fiscal 2022.

Fiscal 2022 Director Compensation Table


Name	Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($)	Stock Awards ($)(1)	All Other Compensation ($)	Total ($)
Jeremy Liew	68,000	199,895	—	267,895
Jenny J. Ming	62,500	199,895	—	262,395
Jeremy G. Philips(2)	21,196	—	—	21,196
Christa S. Quarles	34,000	244,883	—	278,883
Keith Rabois(3)	—	—	—	—
Jacqueline D. Reses	21,500	244,883	—	266,383
James D. White	42,207	244,883	—	287,090

(1) Reported amounts represent the aggregate grant date fair value of RSUs granted during fiscal 2022, as computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 718. See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2022 for the assumptions used in calculating the grant date fair value. The grant date fair value does not necessarily correspond to the actual economic value that may be realized for these awards. As of June 30, 2022, our non-employee directors had the following RSUs outstanding: Mr. Liew-1,864, Ms. Ming-8,668, Ms. Quarles-1,864, Mr. Rabois-0, Ms. Reses-8,668, and Mr. White-8,668.

(2) Mr. Philips did not stand for re-election at our 2021 annual meeting held in December 2021. Therefore, his compensation reflects his service for a portion of fiscal 2022.

(3) Mr. Rabois waived his right to any non-employee director compensation in fiscal 2022.

PROPOSAL NO. 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Our Board is currently composed of nine members. In accordance with our certificate of incorporation, our Board is divided into three classes with staggered three-year terms. One class is elected each year at the annual meeting of stockholders for a term of three years. At the Annual Meeting, three Class II directors will be elected for

a three-year term to succeed the same class whose term is then expiring. Each director’s term continues until the election and qualification of such director’s successor, or such director’s earlier death, resignation or removal.

Nominees

Our Board has nominated Jenny J. Ming, Christa S. Quarles, and Keith Rabois for election as Class II directors at the Annual Meeting. If elected, each of Ms. Ming, Ms. Quarles, and Mr. Rabois will serve as Class II directors until the 2025 Annual Meeting of stockholders and until their successors are elected and qualified or their earlier death, resignation or removal. Each of the nominees is currently a director of the Company. For information concerning the nominees, see the section entitled “Board of Directors and Corporate Governance.”

If you are a stockholder of record and you sign your proxy card or vote over the internet or by telephone but do not

give instructions with respect to the voting of directors, your shares will be voted FOR the election of Ms. Ming, Ms. Quarles, and Mr. Rabois. We expect that Ms. Ming, Ms. Quarles, and Mr. Rabois will accept such nomination; however, in the event that a director nominee is unable or declines to serve as a director at the time of the Annual Meeting, the proxies will be voted for any nominee who shall be designated by our Board to fill such vacancy. If you are a beneficial owner of shares of our common stock and you do not give voting instructions to your broker, bank or other nominee, then your broker, bank or other nominee will leave your shares unvoted on this matter.

Vote Required

The election of Class II directors requires a plurality vote of the voting power of the shares of our common stock present in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote thereon to be approved. Accordingly, the three nominees receiving the highest number of votes cast

“FOR” will be elected. Any shares voted “WITHHOLD” and broker non-votes are not considered votes cast for the foregoing purpose and will have no effect on the outcome of the election.

The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the election of each of the nominees named in this Proxy Statement as Class II Directors to serve for a three-year term.

PROPOSAL NO. 2: RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Our Audit Committee has appointed Deloitte & Touche LLP, as our independent registered public accounting firm to audit our consolidated financial statements for our fiscal year ending June 30, 2023. Deloitte & Touche LLP has served as our independent registered public accounting firm since 2020.

At the Annual Meeting, stockholders are being asked to ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for our fiscal year ending June 30, 2023. Stockholder ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP is not required by our bylaws or other applicable legal requirements. However, our Board is submitting the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP to our stockholders for ratification as a matter of good corporate governance. In the event that this appointment is not ratified by the affirmative

vote of a majority of the shares present in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote, our Audit Committee will consider the outcome of the vote in determining whether to retain this firm for our fiscal year ending June 30, 2023. Even if the appointment is ratified, our Audit Committee, in its sole discretion, may appoint another independent registered public accounting firm at any time during our fiscal year ending June 30, 2023 if our Audit Committee believes that such a change would be in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. A representative of Deloitte & Touche LLP is expected to be present at the Annual Meeting, will have an opportunity to make a statement if he or she wishes to do so, and is expected to be available to respond to appropriate questions from stockholders.

Fees Paid to the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The following table presents fees for professional audit services and other services rendered to us by Deloitte & Touche LLP for our fiscal years ended June 30, 2022 and 2021.


	Fiscal 2022		Fiscal 2021
Audit Fees(1)	$	3,446,463	$	3,142,438
Audit-Related Fees(2)		750,418		874,715
Tax Fees(3)		914,261		633,314
All Other Fees		—		—
Total Fees	$	5,111,142	$	4,650,468

(1)“Audit Fees” consisted of fees for professional services provided in connection with the annual audit of our consolidated financial statements (including the adoption of new accounting standards and certain other accounting consultations), quarterly reviews of interim condensed consolidated financial statements, SEC registration statements (including our IPO), and related administrative charges.

(2)“Audit-Related Fees” consisted of fees for professional services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements not reported as “Audit Fees.” This category includes fees related to acquisition support due diligence procedures and fees related to service organization controls reporting.

(3)“Tax Fees” related to professional services rendered in connection with tax compliance and preparation relating to tax returns and tax audits, as well as for tax consulting and planning services.

Auditor Independence

In the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022, there were no other professional services provided by Deloitte & Touche LLP that would have required our Audit Committee to

consider their compatibility with maintaining the independence of Deloitte & Touche LLP.

Audit Committee Policy on Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Our Audit Committee has established a policy governing our use of the services of our independent registered public accounting firm. Under the policy, our Audit

Committee is required to pre-approve all audit and permissible non-audit services performed by our independent registered public accounting firm in order to

ensure that the provision of such services does not impair such accounting firm’s independence. All fees paid to Deloitte & Touche LLP for our fiscal years ended June 30,

2022 and 2021 were pre-approved by our Audit Committee or, prior to the formation of our Audit Committee, the Board.

Vote Required

The ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the voting power of the shares of our common stock present in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled

to vote thereon. Abstentions will have the effect of a vote AGAINST the proposal.

The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for our fiscal year ending June 30, 2023.

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

The information contained in this Audit Committee report shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material,” “filed” with the SEC, subject to Regulations 14A or 14C of the Exchange Act, or subject to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Exchange Act. No portion of this Audit Committee report shall be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act through any general statement incorporating by reference in its entirety the proxy statement in which this report appears, except to the extent that Affirm specifically incorporates this report or a portion of it by reference.

The Audit Committee assists our Board in oversight of (1) our accounting and financial reporting processes and the audits of our financial statements; (2) the independent auditor’s qualifications, independence, and performance; (3) our internal audit function and the performance of our internal controls; (4) financial, operational, and security risk exposures; and (5) our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements. Deloitte & Touche LLP, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, was responsible for auditing the financial statements prepared by our management for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022.

In connection with our review of our audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022, we relied on reports received from Deloitte & Touche LLP as well as the advice and information we received during discussions with our management. In this context, we hereby report as follows:

a.the Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 with our management;

b.the Audit Committee has discussed with Deloitte & Touche LLP, the matters required to be discussed under the rules adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) and the SEC;

c.the Audit Committee has received and reviewed the written disclosures and the letter from Deloitte & Touche LLP, required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the independent registered public accounting firm’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and has discussed with Deloitte & Touche LLP its independence from the Company; and

d.based on the review and discussion referred to in paragraphs (a) through (c) above, the Audit Committee recommended to our Board that the audited financial statements be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022, for filing with the SEC.

Members of the Audit Committee:

Christa S. Quarles (Chair)

Jenny J. Ming

Keith Rabois

Jacqueline D. Reses

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The following table sets forth certain information about our executive officers and their respective ages as of October 1, 2022. Officers are elected by the Board to hold

office until their successors are elected and qualified or such officer’s earlier death, resignation or removal.


Name	Age	Position
Max Levchin	47	Founder, CEO and Chairman of Affirm Holdings, Inc.
Michael Linford	39	Chief Financial Officer
Katherine Adkins	60	Chief Legal Officer
Libor Michalek	49	President, Technology, Risk and Operations

For the biographies of Messrs. Levchin and Michalek, see “Board of Directors and Corporate Governance—Continuing Directors.”

Michael Linford has served as our Chief Financial Officer since August 2018. Prior to joining Affirm, Mr. Linford held various leadership roles at HP Inc. (“HP”), a global provider of personal computing devices, and Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company (“HPE”), an enterprise information technology company, including Chief Financial Officer of HPE Software from March 2017 to May 2018 and Vice President of M&A Integration at HPE from 2015 to March 2017. Mr. Linford also served as Vice President, License Verification and Strategic Deals of Micro Focus International plc, a software and information technology company, from September 2017 to May 2018. Prior to HP, Mr. Linford served as a Principal at KKR & Co., a global investment company, focusing on retail and consumer private equity, and as a Business Analyst at McKinsey & Company, focusing on the consumer, retail and energy sectors. Mr. Linford earned a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering with Highest Honors from The University of Texas at Austin.

Katherine Adkins has served as our Chief Legal Officer since July 2021. Prior to her appointment as Chief Legal Officer, Ms. Adkins served as Vice President, Legal and Bank Strategy and Deputy General Counsel, Legal Platforms from 2019 to July 2021. Prior to joining Affirm, Ms. Adkins served as Group Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of Toyota Financial Services from 2009 to 2019. Ms. Adkins has 30 years of experience in the automotive, financial services, and financial technology industries. Ms. Adkins earned her B.A. in International Studies and Economics from the University of Nebraska, Lincoln and J.D. from Loyola University of Los Angeles.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis describes the compensation program for our CEO, our Chief Financial Officer, and our next three most highly compensated executive officers (other than our CEO and Chief Financial

Officer), whom we refer to as our named executive officers. For fiscal 2022, our named executive officers were:


Name			Position
Max Levchin			Founder, CEO and Chairman of the Board of Directors
Michael Linford			Chief Financial Officer
Katherine Adkins			Chief Legal Officer
Libor Michalek			President, Technology, Risk and Operations
Silvija Martincevic			Chief Commercial Officer

Executive Transition in Fiscal 2022

On May 31, 2022, Ms. Martincevic notified us of her decision to resign as our Chief Commercial Officer effective as of June 30, 2022. In connection with her resignation, on June 6, 2022, Ms. Martincevic entered into

a Transition Agreement with us pursuant to which she will serve as a consultant to us from July 1, 2022 to December 31, 2022.

Executive Summary

Who We Are

We founded Affirm in 2012 with a mission to deliver honest financial products that improve lives. We are building the next generation platform for digital and mobile-first commerce. We believe by using modern technology, the very best engineering talent, and a mission-driven approach we can reinvent the payment experience. Our solutions, which are built on trust and

transparency, make it easier for consumers to spend responsibly and with confidence, easier for merchants to convert sales and grow, and easier for commerce to thrive. On January 15, 2021, we completed our IPO of our Class A common stock.

Fiscal 2022 Business Highlights

Fiscal 2022 was a strong year for us marked by significant achievements across our business. Fiscal 2022 business highlights included the following:

Financial Highlights

•Total revenue was $1.3 billion, a 55% increase from the fiscal year ended June 30, 2021 (“fiscal 2021”)

•Total revenue less transaction costs* was $662.4 million compared to $431.6 million in fiscal 2021

•Operating loss was $866.0 million compared to $383.7 million in fiscal 2021

•Adjusted operating loss* was $78.3 million compared to an adjusted operating income of $14.3 million in fiscal 2021

•Net loss was $707.4 million compared to $441.0 million in fiscal 2021

Operating Highlights

•Gross merchandise volume (“GMV”)** was $15.5 billion, an 87% increase from fiscal 2021

•Active merchants saw an increase from 29,000 as of June 30, 2021 to 235,000 as of June 30, 2022

•Active consumers increased 96% from June 30, 2021 to 14.0 million consumers as of June 30, 2022

•Transactions per active consumer increased 31% from June 30, 2021 to approximately 3.0 transactions as of June 30, 2022

* Total revenue less transaction costs and adjusted operating income (loss) are non-GAAP financial measures. We believe that total revenue less transaction costs is a useful financial measure to both us and investors of the economic value generated by transactions processed on the Affirm platform. We also believe that adjusted operating income (loss) is a useful financial measure to both us and investors for evaluating our operating performance and that it facilitates period to period comparisons of our results of operations as the items excluded generally are not a function of our operating performance. For a full reconciliation for each non-GAAP financial measure to the most directly comparable financial measure stated in accordance with GAAP, please see Appendix A to this proxy statement.

** GMV is a key operating metric that we define as the total dollar amount of all transactions on the Affirm platform during the applicable period, net of refunds. GMV does not represent revenue earned by us. However, we believe that GMV is a useful operating metric to both us and investors in assessing the volume of transactions that take place on the Affirm platform, which is an indicator of the success of our merchants and the strength of the Affirm platform.

Fiscal 2022 Executive Compensation Highlights

The Compensation Committee took the following key actions with respect to the compensation of our named executive officers for and during fiscal 2022:

•Base Salaries. In connection with the Compensation Committee's annual review of our executive compensation program, the Committee increased the annual base salaries of our named executive officers (other than our CEO) in order to more competitively position each executive given the highly competitive talent market in which we operate. In addition, in December 2021, the Board increased our CEO's base salary effective as of July 1, 2021 to align with minimum wage requirements under applicable California laws in effect at that time.

•Annual Cash Incentive Plan. The Compensation Committee approved annual cash incentive plan

payments for our named executive officers (other than our CEO) based on achievement of short-term financial and operational performance targets set by the Compensation Committee.

•Long-Term Incentive Compensation. The Compensation Committee approved grants to our named executive officers (other than our CEO) of time-vesting options to purchase shares of our Class A common stock and time-vesting grants of restricted stock units, or RSUs, with time-based vesting that upon vesting will settle in shares of our Class A common stock. Equity awards granted in fiscal 2022 to our named executive officers (other than our CEO) serve as a retention incentive over the two-year vesting period.

Pay-for-Performance

We believe our executive compensation program is reasonable, competitive, and appropriately balances the goals of attracting, motivating, rewarding, and retaining our named executive officers with the goal of aligning their interests with those of our stockholders. To ensure this alignment and to motivate and reward individual initiative and effort, a substantial portion of our named executive officers’ target annual total direct compensation opportunity is both variable in nature and “at-risk.”

We emphasize variable compensation that appropriately rewards our named executive officers through two separate compensation elements:

•First, our named executive officers (other than our CEO) participate in our annual cash incentive plan, which provides those officers with the opportunity to earn cash incentive payments based on achievement of short-term financial and operational performance targets set by the Compensation Committee. The performance measures applicable to awards made

under our cash incentive plan in fiscal 2022 are described below.

•In addition, for our named executive officers (other than our CEO), we grant time-vesting options to purchase shares of our Class A common stock and time-vesting RSUs that will settle in shares of our Class A common stock. The options and RSUs granted in fiscal 2022 vest in equal monthly installments for a period of 24 months, subject to the recipient’s continued service as of each vesting date. The value of these awards is closely linked to the value of our Class A common stock, thereby aligning the interests of our named executive officers with those of our stockholders.

We believe that this design provides balanced incentives for our named executive officers to drive both short-term financial performance and long-term growth.

Executive Compensation Policies and Practices

We endeavor to maintain sound governance standards consistent with our executive compensation policies and practices. The Compensation Committee evaluates our executive compensation program on a regular basis to ensure that it is consistent with our short-term and long-

term goals, given the dynamic nature of our business and the market in which we compete for executive talent. The following summarizes our key executive compensation-related policies and practices:


What We Do
ü			Maintain an Independent Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee consists solely of independent directors who establish our executive compensation policies and practices.
ü			Retain an Independent Compensation Consultant. The Compensation Committee retains its own compensation consultant to provide information, analysis, and other advice on executive compensation matters independent of management. This consultant performed no other consulting or other services for us in fiscal 2022.
ü			Conduct an Annual Executive Compensation Review. The Compensation Committee reviews and approves our executive compensation strategy at least annually. This assessment includes a review and determination of our compensation peer group used for comparative purposes. The assessment also includes a review of our compensation-related risk profile to ensure that our compensation program does not encourage excessive or inappropriate risk-taking and that the level of risk that it does encourage is not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on us.
ü			Significant Portion of Target Total Direct Compensation “At-Risk”. A significant portion of our named executive officers’ target annual total direct compensation is “at risk” based on our financial, operational, and strategic results and our stock price performance to align the interests of our named executive officers with those of our stockholders.
ü			Establish Multi-Year Vesting Requirements. The equity awards granted to our named executive officers vest or, in the case of our CEO, are earned, over multi-year periods, consistent with current market practice and our retention objectives.
ü			Maintain “Double-Trigger” Change in Control Arrangements. All payments and other benefits that our named executive officers may be eligible to receive under our Officer Severance Plan in the event of a change in control of the Company are “double-trigger” arrangements (requiring both a change in control of the Company plus a qualifying termination of employment before payments and benefits are paid). All such payments and benefits are subject to the execution and delivery of an effective general release of claims in favor of the Company.
ü			Provide Only Nominal Cash Compensation to Our CEO. Our CEO receives only a nominal cash base salary and does not participate in our annual cash incentive plan, making substantially all of his compensation “at-risk” and performance based.
ü			Conduct Succession Planning. We review the risks associated with our key executive officer positions in order to develop and implement appropriate succession plans for our most critical positions.


What We Don’t Do
û			No Executive Retirement Plans. We do not currently offer defined benefit pension plans or any non-qualified deferred compensation plans or arrangements to our named executive officers. Our named executive officers are eligible to participate in our 401(k) retirement plan on the same basis as our other employees.
û			Limited Perquisites. Perquisites or other personal benefits are not a significant part of our compensation program for our named executive officers.
û			No Excise Tax Payments on Future Post-Employment Compensation Arrangements. We do not provide our named executive officers with excise tax reimbursement payments (including “gross-ups”) on payments or benefits contingent upon a change in control of the Company.
û			No Special Health or Welfare Benefits. We do not provide our named executive officers with any health or welfare benefit programs, other than participation in our broad-based employee programs on the same basis as our other full-time, salaried employees.


û			No Hedging of Company Stock. Under our Insider Trading Policy, our employees, including our named executive officers, and the members of our Board are prohibited from making short sales and engaging in transactions in publicly traded options, warrants, puts and calls or similar instruments with respect to our securities. This includes any hedging or similar transaction designed to decrease the risks associated with holding our common stock.

Executive Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

Our executive compensation program is guided by our overarching philosophy of paying for high and demonstrable performance. We strive to compensate our named executive officers in a manner that is competitive, rewards achievement of our business objectives, and aligns the interests of our named executive officers with those of our stockholders. Consistent with this philosophy, we have designed our executive compensation program to achieve the following primary objectives:

•provide market competitive compensation and benefit levels that will attract, motivate, reward and retain our named executive officers within the context of responsible cost management;

•establish a direct link between our financial, operational and strategic objectives and the compensation of our named executive officers;

•align the interests and objectives of our named

executive officers with those of our stockholders by linking their long-term incentive compensation opportunities to stockholder value creation and their cash incentives to our annual performance; and

•offer total compensation opportunities to our named executive officers that, while competitive, are internally consistent and fair.

Generally, we structure the annual compensation of our named executive officers using three principal elements: base salary, annual cash incentive opportunities, and long-term incentive compensation opportunities in the form of equity awards. The design of our executive compensation program is influenced by a variety of factors, with the primary goals being to align the interests of our named executive officers and stockholders and to link pay with performance.

Compensation-Setting Process

Role of the Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee discharges the responsibilities of our Board relating to the compensation of our executive officers (other than our CEO). The Compensation Committee has the overall responsibility for overseeing our compensation and benefits policies generally, and overseeing, evaluating and approving the compensation plans, policies and practices applicable to our named executive officers (other than our CEO). The independent members of our Board discharge the responsibilities of our Board relating to the compensation of our CEO.

In carrying out its responsibilities, the Compensation Committee (or, in the case of our CEO, the independent directors) evaluates our compensation policies and practices with a focus on the degree to which these policies and practices reflect our executive compensation philosophy. The Compensation Committee also develops strategies and makes decisions that it believes further our philosophy or align with best compensation practices. The Compensation Committee reviews the performance of our

named executive officers when making decisions with respect to their compensation and recommendations for the compensation of our CEO.

The Compensation Committee’s authority, duties and responsibilities are further described in its charter, which is reviewed annually and revised and updated as warranted. The charter is available on the “Corporate Governance” section of our investor relations website at investors.affirm.com/corporate-governance/governance-overview.

The Compensation Committee retains a compensation consultant (as described below) to provide support in the review and assessment of our executive compensation program; however, the Compensation Committee (or, in the case of our CEO, the independent directors) exercises its own judgment in making final decisions with respect to the compensation of our named executive officers.

Setting Base Salaries and Long-Term Incentive Compensation Opportunities

The Compensation Committee reviews the base salary

levels and long-term incentive compensation

opportunities of our named executive officers at the beginning of each calendar and fiscal year, or more frequently as warranted. Adjustments are generally effective at the beginning of the calendar or fiscal year, as applicable.

The Compensation Committee does not establish a specific target for formulating the base salaries and long-

term incentive opportunities of our named executive officers. In making decisions about the compensation of our named executive officers (other than the compensation of our CEO), the members of the Compensation Committee rely primarily on their general experience and subjective considerations of various factors, including the following:


Factors Considered by the Compensation Committee in Determining Compensation
•our executive compensation program objectives
•our performance against the financial, operational and strategic objectives established by our Board
•each individual named executive officer’s knowledge, skills, experience, qualifications and tenure relative to other similarly situated executives at the companies in our compensation peer group and in selected broad-based compensation surveys
•the scope of each named executive officer’s role and responsibilities compared to other similarly situated executives at the companies in our compensation peer group and in selected broad-based compensation surveys
•the prior performance of each individual named executive officer, based on a subjective assessment of his or her contributions to our overall performance, ability to lead his or her business unit or function and work as part of a team, all of which reflect our core values
•the potential of each individual named executive officer to contribute to our long-term financial, operational and strategic objectives
•compensation parity among our named executive officers
•our financial performance relative to our compensation and performance peers
•the compensation practices of our compensation peer group and in selected broad-based compensation surveys and the positioning of each named executive officer’s compensation in a ranking of peer company compensation levels based on an analysis of competitive market data
•the recommendations of our CEO with respect to the compensation of our named executive officers (except with respect to his own compensation)

These factors provide the framework for compensation decision-making regarding the compensation opportunity for each named executive officer. No single factor is determinative in setting compensation levels, nor is the impact of any individual factor on the determination of compensation levels quantifiable.

The members of the Compensation Committee do not weigh these factors in any predetermined manner, nor do they apply any formulas in making their compensation decisions or recommendations. The members of the Compensation Committee consider this information in light of their individual experience, knowledge of the Company, knowledge of the competitive market, knowledge of each named executive officer and business judgment in making their decisions and recommendations.

The members of the Compensation Committee do not engage in formal benchmarking against other companies’ compensation programs or practices to set compensation levels or make specific compensation decisions with respect to our named executive officers. Instead, in making its determinations, the members of the Compensation Committee review information summarizing the compensation paid at a representative group of peer companies, to the extent that the executive positions at these companies are considered comparable to our positions and informative of the competitive environment, to gain a general understanding of market compensation levels.

Setting Annual Incentive Compensation Opportunities

The Compensation Committee reviews the annual incentive compensation arrangements of our named executive officers (other than our CEO) at the beginning of

each calendar and fiscal year, or more frequently as warranted.

The Compensation Committee does not establish a specific target for formulating the annual incentive compensation opportunities of our named executive officers. In making decisions about the annual incentive compensation of our named executive officers, the members of the Compensation Committee rely primarily on the same general experience and subjective considerations of the same factors described above. These factors provide the framework for compensation decision-making regarding the annual incentive compensation opportunity for each named executive officer (other than our CEO). No single factor is determinative in setting compensation levels, nor is the impact of any individual factor on the determination of compensation levels quantifiable.

The members of the Compensation Committee do not weigh these factors in any predetermined manner, nor do they apply any formulas in making their compensation decisions. The members of the Compensation Committee

consider this information in light of their individual experience, knowledge of the Company, knowledge of the competitive market, knowledge of each named executive officer and business judgment in making their decisions.

The members of the Compensation Committee do not engage in formal benchmarking against other companies’ compensation programs or practices to set annual incentive compensation levels or make specific compensation decisions with respect to our named executive officers. Instead, in making its determinations, the members of the Compensation Committee review information summarizing the compensation paid at a representative group of peer companies and in selected broad-based compensation surveys, to the extent that the executive positions at these companies are considered comparable to our positions and informative of the competitive environment, to gain a general understanding of market compensation levels.

Role of Management

In discharging its responsibilities, the members of the Compensation Committee work with members of our management, including our CEO. Our management assists the Compensation Committee by providing information on corporate and individual performance, market compensation data, and management’s perspective on compensation matters. The Compensation Committee solicits and reviews our CEO’s proposals with respect to program structures, as well as his recommendations for adjustments to base salaries, annual cash incentive compensation, and long-term incentive compensation opportunities, and other compensation-related matters for our named executive officers (except with respect to his own compensation).

At least once each fiscal year, our CEO reviews the

performance of our other named executive officers based on such individual’s level of success in accomplishing business objectives and his or her overall performance and then shares these evaluations with, and makes compensation recommendations to, the Compensation Committee. The members of the Compensation Committee review and discuss our CEO’s proposals and recommendations with our CEO and consider them as one factor in determining and approving the compensation of our named executive officers (other than our CEO). Our CEO also generally attends meetings of our Board and the Compensation Committee at which executive compensation matters are addressed, except with respect to discussions involving his own compensation.

Role of the Compensation Consultant

The members of the Compensation Committee have the authority to retain an external compensation consultant to assist them by providing information, analysis and other advice relating to the compensation of our named executive officers, including the authority to approve the consultant’s reasonable fees and other retention terms. The compensation consultant reports directly to the Compensation Committee and its chair and serves at the discretion of the Compensation Committee, which reviews the engagement annually.

In fiscal 2022, the Compensation Committee engaged Compensia, Inc. (“Compensia”), a national compensation

consulting firm, to serve as its compensation consultant to advise on executive compensation matters, including competitive market pay practices for our named executive officers, and with the data analysis and selection of the compensation peer group.

During fiscal 2022, Compensia attended the meetings of the Compensation Committee, both with and without management present, as requested and provided various services, including the following:

•the review, analysis, and selection of our compensation peer group;

•the review and analysis of the base salary levels,

annual cash incentive opportunities, and long-term incentive compensation opportunities of our named executive officers against competitive market data based on the companies in our compensation peer group and in selected broad-based compensation surveys;

•an assessment of executive compensation trends within our industry, and update on corporate governance and regulatory issues and developments;

•an executive compensation risk assessment;

•consultation with the Compensation Committee chair or the independent directors between meetings; and

•support on other ad hoc matters throughout the fiscal year.

The terms of Compensia’s engagement include reporting directly to the Compensation Committee chair. In fiscal

2022, Compensia did not provide any other services to us.

The Compensation Committee has evaluated its relationship with Compensia to assess Compensia’s independence from management. This review process included a review of the services that Compensia provided, the quality of those services, and the fees associated with the services provided during fiscal 2022. Based on this review, as well as consideration of the factors affecting independence set forth in Exchange Act Rule 10C-1(b)(4), Rule 5605(d)(3)(D) of the NASDAQ Marketplace Rules, and such other factors as were deemed relevant under the circumstances, the Compensation Committee has determined that no conflict of interest was raised as a result of the work performed by Compensia.

Competitive Positioning

The Compensation Committee believes that peer group comparisons are useful guides to evaluate the competitiveness of our executive compensation program and related policies and practices. For purposes of assessing the compensation of our named executive officers against the competitive market, the Compensation Committee reviews and considers the compensation levels and practices of a select group of peer companies. This compensation peer group consists primarily of technology companies that are similar to us in terms of revenue, market capitalization, and industry focus. The competitive data drawn from this compensation peer group is only one of several factors considered in making decisions and recommendations with respect to the compensation of our named executive officers.

The compensation peer group for purposes of setting fiscal 2022 compensation of our named executive officers, which was developed by the Compensation Committee in May 2021 with the assistance of Compensia, was composed of publicly traded technology companies against which we compete for executive talent. In identifying and recommending the companies to comprise

the compensation peer group, the Compensation Committee and Compensia considered the following primary criteria:

•publicly traded companies headquartered in the United States or Canada and traded on a major United States stock exchange within related or adjacent industries as us;

•similar revenues – within a range of ~0.5x to ~2.0x of our then trailing four fiscal quarters’ revenue of approximately $762 million (approximately $381 million to approximately $1,524 million); and

•similar market capitalization – within a range of ~0.25x to ~4.00x of our then 30-day average market capitalization of approximately $18 billion (approximately $4.5 billion to approximately $72 billion).

This compensation peer group for purposes of determining the fiscal 2022 compensation of our named executive officers consisted of the following companies:

2022 Peer Group(1)

Afterpay(2)

Dropbox

Okta(2)

Proofpoint

The Trade Desk(2)

Bill.com Holdings(2)

Fair Isaac

Paychex

Q2 Holdings

WEX

Coupa Software

Lemonade(2)

Paycom Software

Shopify

Zendesk

Datadog(2)

MarketAxess Holdings

Paylocity Holding

Square

Zscaler(2)

(1) The following companies were removed from the peer group used to evaluate fiscal 2022 compensation decisions: Bottomline Technologies, Lending Club, LendingTree, and New Relic. These companies were removed due to a difference in size and scale.

(2) Represents a new peer company for fiscal 2022, which was selected based on the peer group selection criteria outlined above.

This compensation peer group was used by the Compensation Committee and independent directors as a reference for understanding the competitive market for executive positions in our industry. The Compensation Committee also reviewed survey data for software companies with similar size, scale, complexity and geographic location as a reference. The independent directors used data drawn from the companies in our compensation peer group and survey data from Radford Global Technology Survey to evaluate the competitive market when determining the total compensation packages for our named executive officers, including base

salary, annual cash incentive opportunities and long-term incentive compensation opportunities and making recommendations for the total compensation package of our CEO.

The Compensation Committee reviews our compensation peer group at least annually and makes adjustments to its composition if warranted, taking into account changes in both our business and the businesses of the companies in the compensation peer group.

Compensation Elements

Generally, our executive compensation program consists of three principal elements – base salary, annual cash incentive opportunities, and long-term incentive compensation in the form of equity awards:

Element

Type of Element

Compensation Element

Objective

Base Salary

Fixed

Cash

Attract and retain executives by providing fixed compensation amounts that are competitive in the market and reward performance

Annual Cash Incentive Opportunities

Variable

Cash

Motivate our executives to achieve annual business objectives and provide financial incentives when we meet or exceed these objectives

Long-Term Incentive Compensation in the Form of Equity Awards

Variable

Equity awards in the form of options to purchase shares of our Class A common stock and RSU awards that settle for shares of our Class A common stock

Align the interests of our executives and our stockholders by motivating them to create sustainable long-term stockholder value

Base Salary

Base salary represents the fixed portion of the compensation of our named executive officers and is an important element of compensation intended to attract and retain highly talented individuals. Generally, we use base salary to provide each named executive officer with a specified level of cash compensation during the fiscal year with the expectation that he or she will perform his or her responsibilities to the best of his or her ability and in our best interests.

Generally, we establish the initial base salary of each of our named executive officers through arm’s-length negotiation at the time we hire the individual, taking into account his or her position, qualifications, experience, prior salary level, and the base salaries of our other executive officers. Thereafter, the members of the Compensation Committee review the base salaries of our named executive officers each year as part of its annual review of our executive compensation program. With input from our CEO (except with respect to his own base salary), the Compensation Committee makes adjustments

to base salary as they determine to be reasonable and necessary to reflect the scope of a named executive officer’s performance, individual contributions and responsibilities. The Compensation Committee also considers positioning in the case of a promotion and market conditions.

In December 2021, the Compensation Committee reviewed the base salaries of our named executive officers, taking into consideration a competitive market analysis prepared by Compensia and the recommendations of our CEO (except with respect to his own base salary), as well as the other factors described in “Compensation-Setting Process—Setting Base Salaries and Long-Term Incentive Compensation Opportunities” above. Following this review, the Compensation Committee determined to adjust the base salaries of each of our named executive officers to bring their base salaries to levels that were comparable to those of similarly situated executives in the competitive marketplace (other than our CEO’s base salary which was adjusted by our Board in

December 2021, effective as of July 1, 2021, to comply with minimum wage requirements under applicable California laws in effect at that time). The base salary

adjustments were effective January 1, 2022, except for the CEO’s adjustment, which was effective July 1, 2021.

During fiscal 2022, the base salaries of our named executive officers were as follows:


Named Executive Officer	Fiscal 2021 Ending Base Salary ($)(1)	Fiscal 2022 Ending Base Salary ($)(2)	Percentage Adjustment (%)
Max Levchin(3)	10,000	29,122	191	%
Michael Linford	440,000	475,000	8	%
Katherine Adkins(4)	365,000	425,000	16	%
Libor Michalek	465,000	475,000	2	%
Silvija Martincevic	440,000	475,000	8	%

(1) Except for Mr. Levchin, these base salaries were in effect as of the end of fiscal 2021 and remained in effect through December 31, 2021.

(2) These base salaries were effective as of January 1, 2022.

(3) Mr. Levchin’s base salary was adjusted effective at the beginning of fiscal 2022 (July 1, 2021).

(4) Ms. Adkins was promoted to report directly to our CEO effective January 1, 2022.

The base salaries paid to our named executive officers during fiscal 2022 are set forth in the “Fiscal 2022 Summary Compensation Table” below.

Annual Cash Incentive Plan Opportunities: Cash Incentive Plan

We use a cash incentive plan to provide our named executive officers (other than our CEO) with the opportunity to earn cash incentive plan awards based upon the achievement of Company short-term financial and operational performance goals. We use the cash incentive plan to motivate our named executive officers (other than our CEO) to achieve our financial and operational performance goals. Mr. Levchin does not participate in the cash incentive plan but instead receives nearly 100% of his target annual total direct compensation opportunity in the form of long-term equity incentive compensation designed to defer the realization of meaningful value until the Company, under Mr. Levchin’s leadership, delivers sustained and significant high-performance levels as described under “Long-Term Incentive Plan Compensation—CEO Long-Term Equity Compensation” below.

Pursuant to the cash incentive plan, the Compensation

Committee establishes a target cash incentive plan opportunity for each participant in the plan with actual awards payable based on actual performance against established financial and operational goals during the applicable performance period. For fiscal 2022, the performance period was July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2022.

To be eligible to earn cash incentive plan awards, a participant has to remain continually employed by us through the end of the applicable performance period. Earned cash incentive plan awards, if any, are paid in cash within two- and one-half months following the end of the applicable performance period and after the Compensation Committee has determined and certified the level of performance achieved and the amount of the cash incentive plan awards earned.

Fiscal 2022 Target Cash Incentive Plan Opportunities

Pursuant to the cash incentive plan, the Compensation Committee established a target cash incentive plan opportunity for each named executive officer (other than our CEO) based upon a specific percentage of each named executive officer’s actual base salary paid during the applicable performance period. In setting these percentages, the Compensation Committee took into

consideration a competitive market analysis prepared by Compensia and the recommendations of our CEO, as well as the other factors described in “Compensation-Setting Process—Setting Annual Incentive Compensation Opportunities” above.

The target cash incentive plan opportunities of our named executive officers for fiscal 2022 were as follows:


Named Executive Officer	Fiscal 2022 Target Cash Incentive Plan Opportunity (as a percentage of base salary)		Fiscal 2022 Target Cash Incentive Plan Opportunity ($)
Max Levchin(1)	—		—
Michael Linford	75	%	343,125
Katherine Adkins(2)	55	%	218,750
Libor Michalek	75	%	352,500
Silvija Martincevic	75	%	343,125

(1) Mr. Levchin does not participate in the cash incentive plan.

(2) Ms. Adkins' target cash incentive plan opportunity was increased from 50% of base salary to 60% of base salary effective January 1, 2022 to reflect her promotion to report directly to our CEO.

Corporate Performance Measures

During fiscal 2022, participants in the cash incentive plan were eligible to receive cash incentive plan awards based upon Company achievement against important corporate, financial, and operational performance measures selected by the Compensation Committee. In May 2021, the Compensation Committee selected three corporate performance measures: network size (weighted 42.5%); total revenue (weighted 32.5%); and adjusted operating income (loss) (weighted 25.0%). In addition to the selected corporate measures, the Compensation Committee also established a funding gate, whereby no payout under the cash incentive plan would occur unless the Company achieved a certain level of total revenue. The Compensation Committee believed these performance

measures were appropriate because they were strong indicators of the successful execution of our business objectives for fiscal 2022. The Compensation Committee also believed these measures provided a strong emphasis on growth while managing expenses and strengthening our customer and merchant relationships. Lastly, the Compensation Committee believed these measures would influence the creation of sustainable long-term stockholder value.

The corporate performance measures for fiscal 2022 were defined as follows:


Fiscal 2022 Corporate Performance Measures
Network size: a blended measure of active consumers, gross merchandise volume, and revenue less transaction costs where: –“active consumers” meant the total number of consumers who engaged in at least one transaction on the Company’s platform during fiscal 2022; –“gross merchandise volume” meant total dollar amount of all transactions on the Company’s platform during fiscal 2022, net of refunds; and –“revenue less transaction costs” meant total net revenue less the sum of loss on loan purchase commitment, provision for credit losses, funding costs, and processing and servicing expense, each determined in accordance with GAAP for fiscal 2022
Total revenue: our GAAP total net revenue for fiscal 2022, as reflected in our audited financial statements for fiscal 2022
Adjusted operating income (loss): our GAAP operating income (loss) for fiscal 2022, adjusted to exclude: –depreciation and amortization expense –stock-based compensation expense included in GAAP operating income (loss) –amortization expense associated with a commercial agreement asset –expense associated with cash incentive plan awards earned during fiscal 2022 –certain other items as set forth in the reconciliation of adjusted operating income (loss) to GAAP operating income (loss) included in Appendix A to this proxy statement

In September 2021, the Compensation Committee set the total revenue funding gate level and the threshold, target, and stretch achievement level for each of the corporate performance measures for fiscal 2022. If achievement against the total revenue funding gate was at or above the

level set by the Compensation Committee, the cash incentive plan would be funded. A performance multiplier would apply based on the corporate performance measures and actual performance achievement relative to the measures. The performance multiplier was to be

determined based on weighted average actual performance against the three corporate performance measures. The performance multiplier could range from 50%, if the minimum, or threshold, level of performance was achieved for all three measures, to 150%, if the Company met or exceeded the maximum, or stretch, level of performance for all three measures. The performance multiplier was 100% if a target level of performance was achieved for all three measures. Achievement levels and performance multiplier percentages for performance

between the threshold and target performance levels and between the target and stretch performance levels were to be calculated using straight-line interpolation. For fiscal 2022, the Compensation Committee set the total revenue funding gate level at $1.183 billion. The threshold, target, and stretch performance levels for each of the three corporate performance measures are set forth in the table below:


Corporate Performance Measure		Threshold		Target		Stretch
Network Size		90	%	100	%	110	%
Total Revenue (in billions)	$	1.19		1.32		1.45
Adjusted Operating Income (Loss) (in millions)	$	(167.20)		(152.00)		(136.80)

Cash Incentive Plan Payments

Under the cash incentive plan, payments are made based on our performance with respect to each of the corporate performance measures and the extent to which each objective was achieved for the year. The Compensation Committee did not make any discretionary adjustments to the cash incentive plan payments made to the named executive officers during fiscal 2022.

Based on fiscal 2022 total revenue, the Compensation

Committee determined that the total revenue funding gate was exceeded. The actual performance, percentage achievement and applicable performance multipliers with respect to each corporate performance measure, as determined by the Compensation Committee based on actual Company performance, are set forth in the table below.


Corporate Performance Measure	Weighting	Actual Performance	Percentage Achievement versus Target Performance	Applicable Performance Multiplier
Network Size	42.5%	95.7%	78.4%	78.4%
Total Revenue	32.5%	$1.35 billion	106.9%	111.5%
Adjusted Operating Income (Loss)	25.0%	$(78.3 million)	130.0%	150.0%
Total	100.0%	—	100.6%	107.1%

As a result, our named executive officers (other than our CEO) received cash incentive plan payments equal to 107.1% of their target cash incentive plan opportunities.

The following table sets forth the target cash incentive

plan opportunities and the actual cash incentive plan payments made to our named executive officers for fiscal 2022:


Named Executive Officer	Target Cash Incentive Plan Opportunity (as a percentage of base salary)		Target Cash Incentive Plan Opportunity ($)	Actual Cash Incentive Plan Payment (as a percentage of Target Cash Incentive Plan Opportunity)		Actual Cash Incentive Plan Payment ($)
Max Levchin	—	%	—	—	%	—
Michael Linford	75	%	343,125	107.1	%	367,315
Katherine Adkins(1)	55	%	218,750	107.1	%	234,172
Libor Michalek	75	%	352,500	107.1	%	377,351
Silvija Martincevic	75	%	343,125	107.1	%	367,315

(1) Ms. Adkins' target cash incentive plan opportunity was increased from 50% of base salary to 60% of base salary effective January 1, 2022 to reflect her promotion to report directly to our CEO. The target cash incentive plan opportunity presented for Ms. Adkins represents an average of those two target percentages.

The cash incentive plan payments made to our named executive officers for fiscal 2022 are set forth in the “Fiscal 2022 Summary Compensation Table” below.

Long-Term Equity Incentive Compensation

As a technology company that encounters significant competition for qualified personnel, long-term incentive compensation plays a critical role in our ability to attract, hire, motivate, reward, and retain qualified and experienced executives. The use of long-term incentive compensation in the form of equity awards is necessary for us to compete for qualified executives without significantly increasing cash compensation and is the most important element of our executive compensation program. We use equity awards to incentivize and reward our named executive officers for long-term corporate

performance based on the value of our Class A common stock and, thereby, to align their interests with the interests of our stockholders. The realized value of these equity awards bears a direct relationship to our stock price, and, therefore, these awards serve as an incentive for our named executive officers to create sustainable value for our stockholders. Equity awards also help us retain our named executive officers in a highly competitive market.

Chief Executive Officer Long-Term Equity Award

As previously disclosed in the proxy statement for our 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, we granted a special equity award to our CEO in advance of our IPO in fiscal 2021 (the “Value Creation Award”).

The Value Creation Award is divided into ten tranches that Mr. Levchin may earn by satisfying a performance condition within a five-year period from the date of grant. Once earned as a result of satisfying the performance condition, each earned tranche of Mr. Levchin’s Value Creation Award becomes vested and exercisable over a five-year period commencing on the date of grant, subject to Mr. Levchin’s continued service to the Company, in annual amounts equal to 15%, 15%, 20%, 25%, and 25%, respectively. The performance condition for each tranche

is satisfied on the date the 90 average trading day volume weighted share price of our Class A common stock exceeds an established stock price hurdle. These stock price hurdles, which were set based on a target percentage of growth from the IPO price of $49 per share, ranging from $65.66 per share to $371.91 per share. Each stock price hurdle will be equitably adjusted to reflect any stock splits, stock dividends or other restructurings impacting our Class A common stock. Any portion of the Value Creation Award that has not been earned by the fifth anniversary of the grant date will be forfeited. As of June 30, 2022, the first four tranches of the Value Creation Award had been earned.

Long-Term Equity Awards of Our Other Named Executive Officers

In fiscal 2022, we used options to purchase shares of our Class A common stock or a combination of options and time-vesting RSU awards that settle for shares of our Class A common stock as retention incentives for our named executive officers (other than our CEO). We believe that because options provide for an economic benefit only in the event that our stock price increases over the exercise price of the option, these awards effectively align the interests of these named executive officers with those of our stockholders and provide these named executive officers with a significant incentive to manage our business from the perspective of an owner with an equity stake in the business. In addition, because the value of RSU awards increases with any increase in the value of the underlying shares, RSU awards can also provide incentives that are aligned with the interests of our stockholders.

In determining the size of the equity awards to be granted to our named executive officers, the Compensation Committee exercises its judgment as to the appropriate size of the awards after considering, among other factors, a competitive market analysis prepared by Compensia, the outstanding equity holdings of each named executive officer (including the current economic value of his or her unvested equity holdings and the ability of these unvested holdings to satisfy our retention objectives), the projected impact of the proposed awards on our earnings, the proportion of our total shares outstanding used for annual employee long-term incentive compensation awards (our “burn rate”) in relation to the annual burn rate ranges of the companies in our compensation peer group and other recently-public technology companies, the potential voting power dilution to our stockholders in relation to the median practice of the companies in our compensation

peer group and the other factors described in “Compensation-Setting Process—Setting Base Salaries and Long-Term Incentive Compensation Opportunities” above. Based upon these factors, the Compensation Committee

determines the size of each award at levels it considers appropriate to create a meaningful opportunity for reward predicated on the creation of long-term stockholder value.

Equity Awards to Ms. Adkins

In January 2022, the Compensation Committee approved an equity award for Ms. Adkins of an option to purchase 29,015 shares of our Class A common stock and an RSU award that settles for 14,636 shares of our Class A common stock. The equity award granted was designed to provide Ms. Adkins with long-term equity compensation aligned with the competitive talent market and to recognize her promotion to report directly to our CEO on January 1, 2022. The equity award vests in 48 equal monthly installments beginning on February 1, 2022 and ending on January 1, 2026, subject to Ms. Adkins continued service as of each vesting date.

In April 2022, the Compensation Committee approved an

additional equity award for Ms. Adkins of an option to purchase 4,239 shares of our Class A common stock. This additional equity award was granted to correct a calculation error relating to the equity award granted to Ms. Adkins in January 2022. This additional equity award vests in 48 equal monthly installments beginning on May 1, 2022 and ending on April 1, 2026, subject to Ms. Adkins continued service as of each vesting date.

The January 2022 and April 2022 equity awards granted to Ms. Adkins are included in the “Total Equity Awards Granted in Fiscal 2022” table below

Fiscal 2022 Retention Equity Awards

In June 2022, the Compensation Committee conducted a review of the long-term incentive compensation provided to our named executive officers, which review took into account, among other factors, the decline in the Company’s stock price during the second half of fiscal 2022 and an evaluation of the continued effectiveness of previously granted equity awards as a retention tool in the context of an ongoing competitive market for senior executive talent. Following that review, and after taking into consideration a competitive market analysis prepared by Compensia, the recommendations of our CEO, and the fact that a majority of our named executive officers had not previously been granted equity awards during fiscal 2022, the Compensation Committee approved grants of equity awards to our named executive officers (other than

our CEO and Ms. Martincevic, who had already notified the Company of her decision to resign as Chief Commercial Officer of the Company).

The equity awards granted to Messrs. Linford and Michalek were in the form of 100% stock options, and the equity awards granted to Ms. Adkins were in the form of a mix of 50% stock options and 50% RSUs. The equity awards vest in 24 equal monthly installments beginning on August, 1, 2022 and ending on July 1, 2024, subject to the recipient’s continued service as of each vesting date.

These retention equity awards are included in the “Total Equity Awards Granted in Fiscal 2022” table below.

Total Equity Awards Granted in Fiscal 2022


Named Executive Officer	Option Shares (#)	RSUs (#)
Max Levchin	—	—
Michael Linford	536,746	—
Katherine Adkins	260,339	132,509
Libor Michalek	536,746	—
Silvija Martincevic	—	—

The equity awards granted to our named executive officers during fiscal 2022 are also set forth in the “Fiscal 2022 Summary Compensation Table” and the “Fiscal 2022 Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table” below.

Health and Welfare Benefits

Our named executive officers are eligible to participate in the same employee benefit plans, and on the same terms and conditions, as all other full-time, salaried U.S. employees. These benefits include medical, dental, vision, and business travel insurance, an employee assistance program, health and dependent care flexible spending accounts, basic life, accidental death and dismemberment, and short-term and long-term disability insurance.

We also maintain a Section 401(k) retirement plan (the “401(k) Plan”) that provides eligible employees, including our named executive officers, with an opportunity to save for retirement on a tax-advantaged basis. Eligible employees are able to participate in the 401(k) Plan as of

the first day of the month following the date they meet the plan’s eligibility requirements. Participants are able to defer up to 100% of their eligible compensation subject to applicable annual limits under the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”). All participants’ interests in their deferrals are 100% vested when contributed.

We design our employee benefits programs to be affordable and competitive in relation to the market as well as compliant with applicable laws and practices. We adjust our employee benefits programs as needed based upon regular monitoring of applicable laws and practices and the competitive market.

Perquisites and Other Personal Benefits

We pay for personal security services for Mr. Levchin. We consider the security services provided to Mr. Levchin to be a reasonable and necessary expense for the Company’s benefit.

Except as noted above, we provide only limited perquisites and other personal benefits to our named executive officers.

Post-Employment Compensation

Transition Agreement with Silvija Martincevic

In connection with her resignation, which became effective June 30, 2022, we entered into a Transition Agreement with Ms. Martincevic. Pursuant to the Transition Agreement, Ms. Martincevic will serve as a consultant to the Company from July 1, 2022 to December 31, 2022 and receive an amount in cash equal to one-half of her final annual salary of $475,000 as compensation for providing those consultancy services. While Ms. Martincevic serves as a consultant for the Company, her options to purchase shares of our Class A common stock and RSUs that may be settled in shares of our Class A common stock will continue to vest in accordance with the terms of the applicable grant agreements. In addition, in recognition of Ms. Martincevic’s prior service and contributions to the Company, the Transition Agreement further provides as follows:

•Ms. Martincevic will receive an additional amount in cash equal to one-half of her final annual salary of $475,000;

•the vesting of outstanding options to purchase 101,382 shares of our Class A common stock held by Ms. Martincevic will be accelerated to December 31, 2022;

•the vesting of outstanding RSU awards that may vest and be settled for 12,151 shares of our Class A common stock held by Ms. Martincevic will be accelerated to December 31, 2022; and

•Ms. Martincevic will receive company-paid premiums for continued health benefits provided under COBRA for up to 12 months from June 30, 2022.

In addition, pursuant to the Transition Agreement, Ms. Martincevic provided a customary release of claims in favor of the Company. A copy of the Transition Agreement was filed with the SEC on August 29, 2022 as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10‐K.

Other Compensation Policies

Prohibition of Hedging of Securities

Under our Insider Trading Policy, our employees, including officers, and the members of our Board are prohibited from making short sales and engaging in transactions in

publicly traded options, warrants, puts and calls or similar instruments with respect to our securities. This includes any hedging or similar transaction designed to decrease

the risks associated with holding our common stock.

Stock Ownership Guidelines

In November 2020, we adopted stock ownership guidelines for our executive officers and members of our Board to further align the interests of those individuals with those of our stockholders. Directors and executive officers have five years from the later of the date of adoption of our stock ownership guidelines or the date they are appointed as a director or executive officer of the Company to achieve compliance with the guidelines.

For purposes of assessing compliance with our stock ownership guidelines, equity ownership includes shares of common stock as to which the director and/or executive officer or his or her spouse or child has a direct or indirect pecuniary interest, shares of common stock issuable upon the settlement of unvested RSUs, and shares of common stock that are subject to vested options.


Role			Stock Ownership Guidelines
Non-Employee Director			5x annual retainer
Chief Executive Officer			5x annual base salary
Executive Officer			3x annual base salary

Tax and Accounting Considerations

The Compensation Committee takes the applicable tax and accounting requirements into consideration in designing and overseeing our executive compensation program.

Deductibility of Executive Compensation

Under Section 162(m) of the Code, compensation paid to anyone serving as the chief executive officer or chief financial officer at any time during the taxable year and the three other most highly compensated executive officers, except for certain grandfathered arrangements (i.e., written binding contracts in effect on November 2, 2017 that have not been modified in any material respect after that date) and certain compensation paid pursuant to a compensation plan in existence before the effective date of our IPO, will not be deductible to the extent it exceeds $1 million. In fiscal 2022, the Compensation Committee considered the potential future effects of Section 162(m) when determining named executive officer compensation and the Compensation Committee is expected to consider the potential future effects of Section 162(m) when determining future named executive

officer compensation. However, the Compensation Committee believes that maintaining the discretion to provide compensation that is non-deductible allows it to provide compensation tailored to the needs of the Company.

Regardless of our intent, there is no guarantee that incentive bonuses or awards, equity-based compensation or other compensation intended to be deductible under Section 162(m) of the Code will ultimately be determined as such by the IRS. In addition, changes in applicable tax laws and regulation, and interpretations of such laws and regulation, as well as other factors beyond our control may affect the deductibility of executive compensation.

Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation

The Compensation Committee takes accounting considerations into account in designing compensation plans and arrangements for our executive officers and other employees. Chief among these is FASB ASC Topic 718, the standard which governs the accounting treatment of certain stock-based compensation. Among other things, FASB ASC Topic 718 requires us to record a compensation expense in our income statement for all equity awards granted to members of our Board, our executive officers

and other employees. This compensation expense is based on the grant date “fair value” of the equity award and, in most cases, will be recognized ratably over the award’s requisite service period (which, generally, will correspond to the award’s vesting schedule). This compensation expense is also reported in the compensation tables below, even though recipients may never realize any value from their equity awards.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis contained in this proxy statement. Based on its review and discussions, the Compensation Committee approved the Compensation Discussion and Analysis for inclusion in this proxy statement and the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for our fiscal year ended June 30, 2022.

Compensation Committee

Jeremy Liew (Chair)

Christa S. Quarles

Jacqueline D. Reses

James D. White

Executive Compensation Tables

Fiscal 2022 Summary Compensation Table

The following table shows the compensation awarded to, earned by or paid to our named executive officers for fiscal 2022, 2021 and 2020, as applicable.


Name and Principal Position	Year	Salary ($)	Bonus ($)	Stock Awards ($)(1)	Option Awards ($)(1)	Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)(2)	All Other Compensation ($)	Total ($)
Max Levchin	2022	29,122	—	—	—	—	449,143(3)	478,265
CEO	2021	10,000	—	—	451,052,591	—	145,135(3)	451,207,726
	2020	10,000	—	—	—	—	—	10,000
Michael Linford	2022	457,500	—	—	6,499,994	367,315	—	7,324,809
Chief Financial Officer	2021	417,083	—	5,347,251	7,619,789	192,555	—	13,576,678
	2020	373,333	45,000(4)	—	—	—	—	418,333
Katherine Adkins(5) Chief Legal Officer	2022	395,000	—	4,000,038	4,068,849	234,172	—	8,698,059
Libor Michalek	2022	470,000	—	—	6,499,994	377,351	—	7,347,345
President, Technology, Risk and Operations	2021	431,667	—	3,220,073	9,736,383	203,496	—	13,591,619
	2020	373,333	—	—	1,906,680	—	—	2,280,013
Silvija Martincevic(6)	2022	457,500	—	288,222	1,345,420	367,315	237,500	2,695,957
Former Chief Commercial Officer	2021	410,833	128,941(7)	5,347,251	7,619,789	267,555	—	13,774,369

(1)The amounts reported represent the aggregate grant date fair value of RSU awards and options granted to the named executive officers during the fiscal years ended June 30, 2022, 2021 and 2020, calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The assumptions used in calculating the grant date fair value of the awards reported in this column are set forth in the notes to our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2022. The amounts reported in this column reflect the accounting cost for these awards and do not correspond to the actual economic value that may be received by the named executive officer upon the sale of any of the underlying shares of Class A common stock.

(2)For fiscal 2022, the performance period for the cash incentive plan was July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2022. For fiscal 2021, the performance period for the cash incentive plan was January 1, 2021 through June 30, 2021.

(3)The fiscal 2022 amount reported includes $448,084 in personal security services and a $1,059 product testing stipend provided to Mr. Levchin. The fiscal 2021 amount reported includes $143,985 in personal security services and a $1,150 product testing stipend provided to Mr. Levchin. Although reported in this column as compensation paid to Mr. Levchin, the Company considers the cost of the personal security services to be a business expense and not a personal benefit to Mr. Levchin.

(4)The fiscal 2020 bonus amount reported for Mr. Linford represents a $45,000 relocation bonus.

(5)Ms. Adkins was not a named executive officer prior to fiscal 2022.

(6)Ms. Martincevic was not a named executive officer prior to fiscal 2021. Ms. Martincevic joined the Company as Chief Commercial Officer in April 2019 and resigned from the Company effective June 30, 2022. Amounts reported for Ms. Martincevic in the Stock Awards and Option Awards columns represent the incremental value associated with the acceleration of vesting of certain RSU awards and options held by Ms. Martincevic pursuant to the terms of her Transition Agreement. Amount reported in the All Other Compensation column represents one-half of Ms. Martincevic’s base salary of $475,000 payable pursuant to the terms of her Transition Agreement. See “—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Compensation Elements--Post-Employment Compensation—Transition Agreement with Silvija Martincevic” for more detail.

(7)The fiscal 2021 bonus amount reported for Ms. Martincevic represents amounts earned during fiscal 2021 pursuant to her performance bonus plan that was in effect during the first half of fiscal 2021.

Fiscal 2022 Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table

The following table provides information concerning each grant of an award made during fiscal 2022 to our named executive officers under any incentive or equity compensation plan. This information supplements the information about these awards set forth in the Fiscal 2022 Summary Compensation Table.


Name	Grant Date	Approval Date	Estimated future payouts under non-equity incentive plan awards(1)			Estimated future payouts under equity incentive plan awards			All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units (#)(2)	All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options (#)(2)	Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards ($)	Grant Date Fair Value of Stock Awards ($)(3)
			Threshold ($)	Target ($)	Max ($)	Threshold (#)	Target (#)	Max (#)
Max Levchin	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Michael Linford	7/1/21	9/2/21	171,563	343,125	514,688	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
	6/8/22	6/8/22	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	536,746