DEF 14A

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(a) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

(Amendment No. ___ )

Filed by the Registrant 

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant 

Check the appropriate box:


	Preliminary Proxy Statement


	Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))


	Definitive Proxy Statement


	Definitive Additional Materials


	Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12

EAGLE FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.

(Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check all boxes that apply):


	No fee required.

      

     Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

      

     Fee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(l) and 0-11

EAGLE FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.

2 East Main Street

P.O. Box 391

Berryville, Virginia 22611

NOTICE OF 2026 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

The 2026 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of Eagle Financial Services, Inc. (the “Company”) will be held in person on Tuesday, May 19, 2026, at 10:00 a.m. at The Barns of Rose Hill, 95 Chalmers Court, Berryville, Virginia. The purpose of the meeting shall be as follows:

To elect four (4) Directors, Brandon C. Lorey, Douglas C. Rinker, John D. Stokely, and Brian T. Strosser, each for a term of three (3) years and to elect two (2) Directors, Susan D. Davies and Karthik Shyamsunder, for a term of two (2) years.

To approve the Eagle Financial Services, Inc. 2026 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.

To ratify the appointment of Yount, Hyde & Barbour, P.C., as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2026.

To transact such other business as shall properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment thereof.

The Board of Directors has fixed the close of business on March 20, 2026, as the record date for determining the shareholders of the Company entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting and any adjournments thereof.


	By order of the Board of Directors,
	Kaley P. Crosen
	Executive Vice President, Secretary

Berryville, Virginia

April 8, 2026

Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, it is important that your shares be represented and voted. You may vote by phone or Internet or, if you request a paper copy of the proxy card, you may complete, sign, date and return the proxy card using the postage-paid envelope provided. The proxy card, when returned properly executed, will be voted in the manner you direct. Instructions regarding the methods of voting are contained on the notice, proxy card or voting instruction form.

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE SHAREHOLDER MEETING TO BE HELD ON MAY 19, 2026:

The proxy statement and the Company’s 2025 annual report on Form 10-K are available at https://www.bankofclarke.bank/EFSI_Annual_Meetings.html

EAGLE FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.

2 East Main Street

P.O. Box 391

Berryville, Virginia 22611

PROXY STATEMENT

2026 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

May 19, 2026

This Proxy Statement is being furnished to the shareholders of Eagle Financial Services, Inc. (the “Company”) in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Board of Directors of the Company to be voted at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 19, 2026, at 10:00 a.m. at The Barns of Rose Hill, Berryville, Virginia, and at any adjournment thereof.

We are furnishing our proxy materials primarily over the Internet rather than mailing paper copies of those materials to each shareholder. On or about April 8, 2026, we first mailed an Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials on the Internet (the “Notice”) to shareholders and posted our proxy materials on the Internet site referenced therein. These proxy materials include the accompanying notice of Annual Meeting, this proxy statement, the proxy card and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025. The Notice provides information regarding how to access these proxy materials on the Internet, vote your shares or request a paper copy of these materials.

The cost of solicitation of proxies and preparation of proxy materials will be borne by the Company. Solicitations of proxies will be made by use of the United States mail, electronic notice and access to the Internet, and may be made by direct or telephone contact by employees of the Company. Brokerage houses and nominees will be requested to forward the proxy materials to the beneficial holders of the shares held of record by these persons, and the Company will reimburse them for their reasonable charges in this connection.

Shareholders are encouraged to vote using any of the methods available to our shareholders. If you are a registered shareholder and attend the meeting, you may vote during the Annual Meeting. The Company also is pleased to offer its shareholders the convenience of voting by phone and online via the Internet. Please review the Notice separately mailed to you, the proxy card or your voting instruction form, as applicable, for instructions.

If a shareholder executes a proxy by completing and returning a proxy card or voting by phone or online in time to be voted at the Annual Meeting, the shares represented by it will be voted in accordance with those instructions. If no direction is made, proxies will be voted in favor of the election of the nominees named in proposal one, for the approval of the Eagle Financial Services, Inc. 2026 Employee Stock Purchase Plan in proposal two and for the ratification of accountants in proposal three. Any person who has returned a proxy has the power to revoke it at any time before it is exercised by submitting a subsequent vote using any of the prescribed methods, by giving notice in writing to the Secretary of the Company, or by attending the meeting and voting during the meeting. If your shares are held in “street name” by your bank or broker and you want to change or revoke your vote, please follow the instructions given by the institution that holds your shares.

The close of business on March 20, 2026, has been fixed as the record date for the Annual Meeting and any adjournment thereof. The number of shares of Common Stock outstanding on that date and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting was 5,412,376. Each outstanding share of the Company’s Common Stock is entitled to one vote on all matters submitted to shareholders at the meeting. There are no cumulative voting rights. A majority of the shares of Common Stock entitled to vote, represented at the virtual Annual Meeting in person or by proxy, constitutes a quorum for the transaction of business at the Annual Meeting.

A shareholder may abstain or (only with respect to the election of directors) withhold his or her vote (collectively, “Abstentions”) with respect to each item submitted for shareholder approval. Abstentions will be counted for purposes of determining the existence of a quorum. Abstentions will not be counted as voting in favor of or against the relevant item.

A broker who holds shares in “street name” has the authority to vote on certain items when it has not received instructions from the beneficial owner, except for certain items for which brokers are prohibited from exercising such discretion. “Broker shares” that are voted on at least one matter will be counted for purposes of determining the existence of a quorum for the transaction of business at the Annual Meeting. Where brokers do not have or do not exercise such discretion, the inability or failure to vote is referred to as a “broker nonvote.” Under the circumstances where the broker is not permitted to, or does not, exercise its discretion, assuming proper disclosure to the Company of such inability to vote, broker nonvotes will not be counted as voting in favor of or against the particular matter. We expect that a broker will be prohibited from voting on proposals one and two without instructions from the beneficial owner; therefore, there may be broker nonvotes on proposals one and two. We expect that a broker may vote on proposal three without instructions from the beneficial owner; therefore, no broker nonvotes are expected to exist in connection with this proposal. If you held your shares in street name, please vote to ensure your shares are voted at the Annual Meeting.

The purposes of the meeting are to elect directors, approve the Company’s 2026 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, ratify the appointment of the Company’s accountants, and vote on such other business, if any, that may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment. The Board of Directors is not aware of any matters other than those described in this Proxy Statement that may be presented for action at the Annual Meeting. However, if other matters do properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment the persons named in the proxy card possess discretionary authority to vote in accordance with their best judgment with respect to such other matters.

PROPOSAL ONE - ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

The Board of Directors of the Company is structured into three classes (I, II, and III) with one class elected each year to serve a three-year term. The term of Class II Directors will expire at the Annual Meeting. The persons named below, all of whom are currently members of the Board, will be nominated to serve as Class II Directors. If elected, the Class II nominees will serve until the 2029 Annual Meeting of Shareholders or until their respective successors are elected and qualified. Additionally, Karthik Shyamsunder and Susan D. Davies were appointed to the Board of Directors in May 2025 and February 2026, respectively, and have been nominated to serve as Class I Directors to serve until the 2028 Annual Meeting of Shareholders or until their respective successors are elected and qualified. Mr. Smalley, a Class I Director, will retire at the Annual Meeting and therefore will not stand for re-election as a Class I Director at the Annual Meeting. All nominees have consented to be named and have indicated their intent to serve if elected. Those nominees receiving the greatest number of votes shall be deemed elected even though they may not receive a majority. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not be considered votes cast and will have no effect on the outcome of this proposal.

Certain information concerning the nominees for election at the Annual Meeting is set forth below, as well as certain information about the Class II and III Directors who will continue in office until the 2027 and 2028 Annual Meetings of Shareholders, respectively. The following biographical information discloses each Director’s age, principal occupation during the last five years and the year that each individual was first elected to the Board of Directors of the Company or previously to the Board of Directors of Bank of Clarke (the “Bank”), the predecessor to and now a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. In addition, the following information includes the particular experiences, qualifications, attributes and skills that lead the Board to conclude that each person should serve as a Director.

The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the Directors nominees set forth below.

Class I (Nominees to serve until the 2029 Annual Meeting):

Brandon C. Lorey, 57, has been a director since 2019.

Mr. Lorey has been the President and Chief Executive Officer of both the Company and the Bank since July 2019. Prior to joining the Company in 2019, he served as Executive Vice President, Head of Consumer Banking of United Bank, a $7.3 billion asset bank headquartered in Connecticut, since 2015. Previously, he served as Executive Vice President, Consumer Lending from April 2014 to June 2015, and as Senior Vice President, Head of Consumer Lending from February 2013 to April 2014. Prior to joining United Bank and its predecessors, he served as Chief Credit and Lending Officer for H&R Block Bank in Kansas City, Senior Vice President at Sovereign Bank in Pennsylvania and held various roles at Chevy Chase Bank, a Federal Savings Bank in Maryland, including Vice President of risk, finance, operations and direct sales.

Douglas C. Rinker, 66, has been a director since 2006.

Mr. Rinker is the Chairman of the Board of Winchester Equipment Company, an equipment sales, rental and service company headquartered in Winchester, Virginia. Mr. Rinker also serves as the Senior Pastor of Round Hill Church. As the Chairman of a successful company, Mr. Rinker provides the Board with valuable insight and guidance on the issues of corporate strategy, business growth and risk management. He has demonstrated his commitment to the community by his past service in several community and civic organizations.

John D. Stokely, Jr., 73, has been a director since 2006.

Mr. Stokely is the former President and owner of Cavalier Land Development Corp., a real estate development company in Oakton, Virginia and is a former President of the Northern Virginia Building Industry Association and the Home Builders Association of Virginia. Mr. Stokely is also a former Chairman and a current Trustee of Shenandoah University as well as a former Trustee of the University of Virginia School of Engineering and Applied Science. His broad experience and perspective as an entrepreneur brings to the Board a substantial resource with respect to finance, strategic planning and corporate governance.

Brain T. Strosser, 56, has been a director since February 2026.

Mr. Strosser brings deep expertise in strategic governance, risk management, and regulated industry oversight from more than 30 years of senior executive leadership experience across the technology and public‑sector contracting markets. He has served as President, Chief Executive Officer, and board member of multiple technology and solutions companies, overseeing corporate strategy, growth initiatives, mergers and acquisitions, and large‑scale operations. He most recently served as President and board member of ClearShark, leading its expansion and its acquisition by Optiv Security.

Class I (Incumbent directors to serve until the 2028 Annual Meeting):

Susan D. Davies, 56, has been a director since February 2026.

Ms. Davies is a Certified Public Accountant (Maryland) and currently serves as Global Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of Alight, Inc., a publicly traded provider of cloud‑based digital human capital and business solutions, a position she has held since May 2021. In this role, she is responsible for the global controllership and external and regulatory reporting functions, Sarbanes‑Oxley Act compliance, and accounting and reporting for significant capital markets and merger and acquisition transactions, including Alight’s 2021 IPO/SPAC transaction. Prior to joining Alight, Ms. Davies served in senior accounting, controllership, and internal audit leadership roles at Willis Towers Watson, and

earlier in her career, at PricewaterhouseCoopers. Ms. Davies brings significant financial leadership and expertise in public-company reporting, financial controls, audit and governance.

Karthik Shyamsunder, 56, has been a director since May 2025

Mr. Shyamsunder currently serves as Vice President and Distinguished Engineer at VeriSign Inc., where he has held various leadership roles since 2000. In this capacity, he collaborates with executive leadership and cross-functional teams to develop innovative products and services that support the growth of the .com registry business. Prior to VeriSign, he was a Principal Engineer at AT&T from 1992 to 2000. In addition to his corporate experience, Mr. Shyamsunder has been a faculty member at Johns Hopkins University since 2000, where he coordinates the Big Data and Cloud Computing program and designs and teaches related courses. Mr. Shyamsunder brings over three decades of experience in the technology and telecommunications sectors, with deep expertise in artificial intelligence, machine learning, and cloud computing.

Class III (Incumbent directors to serve until the 2027 Annual Meeting):

Tatiana C. Matthews, 69, has been a director since 2022.

Ms. Matthews is the Co-Founder, President Emerita and Chairman of the Board of the Matthews Group, Inc. t/a TMG Construction Corporation (“TMG”). TMG is a leading design/builder and general contractor serving aviation, institutional, governmental, and military clients nationwide. Woman/Native American (Hawaiian) owned and MBE-certified, TMG specializes in new construction, renovations and additions, and facilities maintenance support under Lump Sum, Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity Task Order and Job Order contracts. Ms. Matthews has earned five academic degrees and serves on the Board of the Washington Airports Task Force, the National Classification Management Society (where she co-chairs the Industrial Security Professional certification for the Defense Industrial Base), the American Council for Construction Education, and the American Institute of Constructors Education Foundation.

Edward Hill, III, 61, has been a director since 2022.

Dr. Hill is a physician executive, entrepreneur, clinical and biomedical informatics researcher, and medical jurisprudence professional. He is an MD/JD with 37 years of experience operating and providing board oversight for multiple medical research and information technology-oriented professional services companies. Dr. Hill is a founding member of three companies with offices in Northern Virginia: Forensic Perinatal, Inc., a clinical medical research company; Fetal Cerebral, Inc., a neuro-information technology R&D company; and Alpharix Partners, LLC, a biomedical informatics R&D company.

Mary Bruce Glaize, 70, has been a director since 1998.

Mrs. Glaize is a retired educator and community volunteer. She is a founder and trustee emerita of the Shenandoah Valley Discovery Museum. Additionally, Mrs. Glaize is an honorary member of the Little Garden Club of Winchester. Her involvement in the communities in which the Company operates allows her to identify the needs of the Bank’s customers.

Cary C. Nelson, 51, has been a director since 2018.

Mrs. Nelson is the Chair of the Board of both the Company and the Bank. She is the President of H.N. Funkhouser & Company, a family-owned petroleum company founded in 1932 which operates in the Northern Shenandoah Valley of Virginia. Mrs. Nelson is a native of the Winchester/Frederick County, Virginia area. She is a Certified Public Accountant with a Bachelor of Science degree from the University of Richmond. Additionally, Mrs. Nelson is the recent past board chair of the Top of Virginia Regional Chamber and an active member of the Rotary Club of Winchester. Her business experience and skill set are valuable resources to the Company in both her role on the Board of Directors and the Company’s Audit Committee.

Class I (Incumbent directors to serve until the 2028 Annual Meeting):

Scott M. Hamberger, 55, has been a director since 2016.

Mr. Hamberger is an entrepreneur, investor, and philanthropist. He is a founder and previous CEO of Fortessa Tableware Solutions, which he grew to international industry leadership prior to leading a successful merger to form the Zwiesel Fortessa Group. As an entrepreneur and executive, Mr. Hamberger brings analytical ability and leadership skills to his role as director. Additionally, he serves on eight for-profit and non-profit Boards and has served as a Director and Chairman of the Loudoun County Chamber of Commerce, and as a Trustee and Chairman of Inova Loudoun Hospital. By living, volunteering, and operating a business in the Company’s area of operations, Mr. Hamberger can help identify the needs of the Company’s customers and potential customers.

John R. Milleson, 69, has been a director since 1999.

Mr. Milleson served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of both the Company and the Bank from 1999 to July 2019. From 1997 to 1999, he was Executive Vice President and Secretary-Treasurer of the Company and Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer of the Bank. He brings operational risk management and financial accounting knowledge.

Director Not Standing for Re-Election

Robert W. Smalley, Jr., 73, has been a director since 1989.

Mr. Smalley recently retired from Smalley Properties Inc., a company focused on real estate management in Berryville, Virginia. He is also the Vice Chairman of Loudoun Mutual Insurance Company, a property and casualty insurance provider in the State of Virginia. Mr. Smalley’s institutional knowledge and longstanding board service make him a distinctively qualified member of the board.

Executive Officers Who Are Not Directors

Kathleen J. Chappell, 59, has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company and the Bank since 2019. Previously, she served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company and the Bank from 2009 to 2019. From 2005 to 2008 she served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Middleburg Financial Corporation.

Kaley P. Crosen, 60, has served as Secretary of the Company and as Executive Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer of the Bank since 2019. Previously, she served as Senior Vice President and Human Resources Director from 2008 to 2019. Ms. Crosen served as Vice President of Human Resources from 1999 to 2008.

Joseph T. Zmitrovich, 56, has served as President and Chief Banking Officer of the Bank since 2022. Previously, he served as Executive Vice President and Chief Banking Officer from 2020 to 2022 and Executive Vice President and Chief Revenue Officer of the Bank from 2019 to 2020. Mr. Zmitrovich served as Senior Vice President and Chief Lending Officer of the Bank from 2016 to 2019. From 2015 to July 2016, he served as Market President of the Southern Pennsylvania region for BB&T. From 2008 to 2015 he served as Senior Vice President and Commercial Executive for Susquehanna Bank.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP

Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers

The following table sets forth, as of March 20, 2026, certain information with respect to beneficial ownership of shares of Common Stock by each of the members of the Board of Directors, by each of the executive officers included in the “Summary Compensation Table” below (collectively, the “named executive officers”) and by all directors and executive officers as a group.


	Amount and Nature
	of Beneficial			Percent of
Name of Beneficial Owner	Ownership (1)			Class (2)
Kathleen J. Chappell		19,481	(3)	*
Susan D. Davies		150		*
Mary Bruce Glaize		17,804		*
Scott M. Hamberger		13,559		*
Edward Hill III		5,600		*
Brandon C. Lorey		44,204		*
John R. Milleson		144,690	(3)		2.67	%
Tatiana C. Matthews		3,617		*
Cary R. Nelson		10,014	(3)	*
Douglas C. Rinker		22,199		*
Karthik Shyamsunder		961		*
Robert W. Smalley, Jr.		26,618	(3)	*
John D. Stokely, Jr.		14,347		*
Brian T. Strosser		12,500		*
Joseph T. Zmitrovich		25,982		*

Directors and executive officers as a group (16 persons)		385,571	(3)(4)		7.12	%

* Percentage of ownership is less than one percent of the outstanding shares of Common Stock.

(1) For purposes of this table, beneficial ownership has been determined in accordance with the provisions of Rule 13d-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 under which, in general, a person is deemed to be the beneficial owner of a security if he has, or shares, the power to vote, or direct the voting, of the security or the power to dispose of, or direct, the disposition of the security, or if he has the right to acquire beneficial ownership of the security within 60 days.

(2) Based on 5,412,376 shares issued and outstanding at March 20, 2026.

(3) Amounts presented include shares of Common Stock that the individuals beneficially own indirectly through family members and affiliated companies and other entities as follows: Ms. Chappell, 33; Mr. Milleson, 94; Ms. Nelson, 312; Mr. Smalley, 1,639.

(4) Amounts presented include 3,868 shares of Common Stock held in the Bank of Clarke County Employee 401(k) Savings and Stock Ownership Plan.

Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners

The following table sets forth, as of March 20, 2026, certain information with respect to the beneficial ownership of shares of Common Stock by each person who owns, to the Company’s knowledge, more than 5% of the Company’s Common Stock.


Name and Address of Beneficial Owner	Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership				Percent of Class (%) (1)
Fourthstone LLC		453,918	(2	)		8.39	%
575 Maryville Center Drive, Suite 110
St. Louis, Missouri 63141

Wellington Management Group LLP		335,668	(3	)		6.20
280 Congress Street
Boston, Massachusetts 02210

James R. Wilkins, Jr.		329,901	(4	)		6.10	%
13 South Loudoun Street
Winchester, Virginia 22601

Vanguard Group Inc.		306,800	(5	)		5.67	%
100 Vanguard Boulevard
Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355

BlackRock Inc.		279,052	(6	)		5.16	%
50 Hudson Yards
New York, NY 10001

(1)

Based on 5,412,376 shares issued and outstanding at March 20, 2026.

(2)

According to Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 13, 2026, Fourthstone LLC reported that, as of December 31, 2025, it had shared voting power and shared dipositive power over 453,918 shares.

(3)

According to Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on May 12, 2025, Wellington Management Group and certain of its affiliated entities reported that, as of March 31, 2025, they had shared voting and dispositive power over 335,668 shares.

(4)

Amount includes 37,000 shares held as trustee under the terms of certain trusts and 68,900 shares held by affiliated companies and other entities.

(5)

According to Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on October 30, 2025, The Vanguard Group reported that, as of September 30, 2025, it had shared voting power over 30,549 shares, sole dispositive power over 274,213 shares and shared dispositive power over 32,587 shares.

(6)

According to Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on January 21, 2026, BlackRock, Inc. reported that, as of December 31, 2025, it had sole voting power over 275,761 shares and sole dispositive power over 279,052 shares.

Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), requires the Company’s directors and executive officers, and any persons who own more than 10% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock, to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) reports of ownership and changes in ownership of Common Stock. Directors and executive officers are required by SEC regulations to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) reports that they file. Based solely on review of the copies of such reports furnished to the Company or written representation that no other reports were required, the Company believes that, during the 2025 year, all filing requirements applicable to its officers and directors were timely satisfied other than as follows: an initial report on Form 3 for Mr. Shyamsunder.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

General

The business and affairs of the Company are managed under the direction of the Board of Directors in accordance with the Virginia Stock Corporation Act and the Company’s Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws. Members of the Board are kept informed of the Company’s business through discussions with the Chair of the Board, the President and Chief Executive Officer and other officers, by reviewing materials provided to them and by participating in meetings of the Board of Directors and its committees.

Independence of the Directors

The Board of Directors has determined that the following 12 individuals of its total 13 members are independent as defined by the listing standards of the Nasdaq Stock Market (“Nasdaq”): Ms. Davies, Mrs. Glaize, Ms. Matthews, Mrs. Nelson and Messrs. Hamberger, Hill, Milleson, Rinker, Shyamsunder, Smalley, Stokely and Strosser. In addition, Mr. Gilpin was considered independent prior to his retirement at the 2025 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. Other than as set forth in “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” there are no material relationships between the Company and any independent directors. The director not considered independent is Mr. Lorey, who serves as the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company.

Board Leadership Structure and Risk Oversight

The Company has been operating for over 140 years using a board leadership structure in which the President and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chair of the Board of Directors positions are filled by separate individuals. The Company believes that its leadership structure is appropriate because by having an outside independent Chair, there exists a certain degree of control and balanced oversight of the management of the Board’s functions and its decision-making processes. In accordance with the Company’s Bylaws, the Board of Directors elects the CEO and the Chair, and each of these positions may be held by the same person or may be held by two persons. Under the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Board does not have a policy, one way or the other, on whether the role of the Chair and CEO should be separate and, if it is to be separate, whether the Chair should be selected from the non-employee directors or be an employee. Under its charter, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee periodically reviews and recommends to the Board the leadership structure of the Board. Because the Company’s Chair and CEO positions are served by two individuals, the Company currently does not require a Lead Director.

The Company believes that its leadership structure allows the directors to provide effective oversight of its risk management function. The Audit Committee oversees the accounting and financial reporting processes of the Company, as well as legal and compliance matters and risk management. The Audit Committee charter provides that the Audit Committee is responsible for overseeing the internal controls of the Company along with its adherence with compliance and regulatory requirements. In carrying out its responsibilities, the Audit Committee works closely with members of Company’s executive management and employees of the firm to which the external audit services of the Company are outsourced. The Audit Committee meets regularly and receives an overview of findings from various risk management initiatives including internal audits, Sarbanes Oxley and compliance reports. The Audit Committee also receives updates between its regular meetings from the CEO, Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) and Chief Risk Officer (“CRO”) and other members of management relating to risk oversight matters. The Audit Committee provides minutes of all its meetings to the full Board. The full Board also engages in periodic discussions with the CEO, CFO and other corporate officers as the Board may deem appropriate.

In addition to the Audit Committee, the other committees of the Board consider the risks within their areas of responsibility. For example, the Compensation Committee considers the risks that may exist in the Company’s executive compensation programs. For a discussion of the Compensation Committee’s review of the Company’s senior executive officer compensation plans, employee incentive compensation plans, and the risks associated with these plans, see “Compensation Policy and Practices Review” on page 9 of this Proxy Statement.

Code of Ethics

The Board of Directors has approved a Code of Ethics for directors, officers and all employees of the Company and the Bank. The Board has also approved an addendum to the Code of Ethics applicable to the Company’s senior financial management, consisting of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. The Code of Ethics addendum addresses, among other things, standards that are reasonably necessary to promote honest and ethical conduct, including conduct with respect to conflicts of interest, full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure in the Company’s required periodic reports and compliance with applicable governmental rules and regulations. A copy of the Company’s Code of Ethics and its addendum may be obtained by visiting the “Investor Relations” section of the Bank’s website at www.bankofclarke.bank.

Any amendments to, or waivers of, the Code of Ethics applicable to our directors, executive officers, principal accounting officer or controller or persons performing similar functions and required to be disclosed will be posted on our website at www.bankofclarke.bank.

Board and Committee Meeting Attendance

During 2025, the Board of Directors of the Company held 11 meetings. The directors of the Company also serve as directors of the Bank. The Bank’s Board held 11 meetings in 2025. During 2025, all directors attended greater than 75% of the aggregate number of meetings of both Boards of Directors and meetings of committees on which he or she was a member.

Executive Sessions

Independent directors meet periodically outside of regularly scheduled Board meetings. These sessions are led by the Chair of the Board. The independent directors met five times during 2025.

Committees of the Board

Audit Committee. The Audit Committee is appointed by the Board of Directors to fulfill its oversight responsibility to the shareholders relating to the integrity of the Company’s financial statements, the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements and the qualifications, independence and the performance of the internal audit function. The Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the work of both the Company’s Director of Internal Audit and the independent registered public accounting firm engaged for the purpose of preparing or issuing an audit report or performing other audit, review or attestation services for the Company. The Audit Committee and the Board of Directors have adopted a written charter for the Audit Committee, which may be viewed by visiting the “Investor Relations” section of the Bank’s website at www.bankofclarke.bank.

The Audit Committee met five times during 2025. This committee consists of Mrs. Nelson and Messrs. Hamberger, Hill, Shyamsunder and Smalley. Each of the members of the Audit Committee is independent as that term is defined in the listing standards of Nasdaq and SEC regulations. The Board has determined that Mrs. Nelson qualifies as an audit committee financial expert as defined by SEC regulations and has designated her as the Company’s audit committee financial expert.

Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee is a committee of the Bank’s Board of Directors. The Compensation Committee met five times in 2025. The Compensation Committee reviews the CEO’s performance and compensation and reviews and sets guidelines for compensation of the other executive officers. All decisions by the Compensation Committee relating to the compensation of the Company’s executive officers are reported to the full Board of Directors. The Compensation Committee consists of Ms. Matthews and Messrs. Hamberger, Rinker, and Smalley, each of whom is independent as that term is defined by the listing standards of Nasdaq and SEC regulations. The Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors have adopted a written charter for the Compensation Committee, which may be viewed by visiting the “Investor Relations” section of the Bank’s website at www.bankofclarke.bank.

Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee. The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee is appointed by the Board of Directors. The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee met six times during 2025. The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee consists of Mrs. Nelson, Mrs. Glaize and Messrs. Hill, Rinker and Stokely, each of whom is independent as that term is defined in the listing standards of Nasdaq. The purpose of this committee is to recommend individuals for election to the Board of Directors in accordance with the Company’s Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws and oversee the corporate governance practices of the Company. The Nominating/Governance Committee and the Board of Directors have adopted a written charter for the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee, which may be viewed by visiting the “Investor Relations” section of the Bank’s website at www.bankofclarke.bank.

In identifying potential nominees, the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee takes into account such factors as it deems appropriate, including the current composition of the Board, the range of talents, experiences and skills that would best complement those that are already represented on the Board, the balance of management and independent directors and the need for specialized expertise. The Board considers candidates for Board membership suggested by its members and management, and the Board will also consider candidates suggested informally by a shareholder of the Company.

The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee considers, at a minimum, the following factors for potential new directors or the continued service of existing directors:

•

the ability of the prospective nominee to represent the interests of the shareholders of the Company;

•

the prospective nominee’s standards of integrity, commitment and independence of thought and judgment;

•

the prospective nominee’s ability to dedicate sufficient time, energy and attention to the diligent performance of his or her duties, including the prospective nominee’s service on other public company boards; and

•

the extent to which the prospective nominee contributes to the range of talent, skill and expertise that represents a diversity of background appropriate for the Board.

The process used for selecting new candidates for the Board of Directors involves identifying the need to add a new member with specific qualifications or to fill a vacancy. The Chair of the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee will initiate a search, which may involve seeking input from Board members and senior management, and considering any candidates recommended by shareholders. A list of candidates which satisfy certain criteria and otherwise qualify for membership is presented to the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee. The Chair of the Board, along with the President and Chief Executive Officer, conducts interviews with preferred candidates from the list.

Afterwards, the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee meets to conduct further interviews of preferred candidates, if necessary, and to recommend final candidates for approval by the full Board of Directors.

Shareholders entitled to vote for the election of directors may submit candidates for formal consideration by the Company in connection with an Annual Meeting if timely written notice is received, in proper form, for each such recommended Director nominee. If the notice is not timely and in proper form, the nominee will not be considered by the Company. To be timely for the 2027 Annual Meeting, the notice must be received within the time frame set forth in the section titled “Shareholder Proposals for the 2027 Annual Meeting” within this Proxy Statement. To be in proper form, the notice must include each nominee’s written consent to be named as a nominee and to serve, if elected, and information about the shareholder making the nomination and the person nominated for election.

Annual Meeting Attendance

The Company has not adopted a formal policy on director attendance at its Annual Meeting, although all directors are encouraged to attend and historically most have done so. All directors attended the Company’s 2025 Annual Meeting.

Shareholder Communication

Shareholders and other interested parties may communicate with all members or any member of the Board of Directors by addressing correspondence to “Board of Directors” or to the individual director. Such correspondence should be addressed to the Secretary of the Company, P.O. Box 391, Berryville, Virginia 22611. All communications so addressed will be forwarded promptly, without screening, to the Chair of the Board of Directors (in the case of correspondence addressed to “Board of Directors”) or to the individual director.

Anti-Hedging Policies

The Company currently does not have any policies with respect to financial instruments or transactions in derivative securities or otherwise that hedge or offset any decrease in the market value of the Company’s common stock.

Director Compensation

The following table provides compensation information for the year ended December 31, 2025, for each non-employee director of the Company’s Board of Directors:

Director Compensation Table

Fiscal Year 2025


	Fees Earned
	or Paid in Cash		Stock Awards		Total
Name (1)	($)		($) (2)		($)
Thomas T. Gilpin		31,017		21,840		52,857
Mary Bruce Glaize		28,400		21,840		50,240
Edward Hill, III		29,800		21,840		51,640
Scott M. Hamberger		33,200		21,840		55,040
Tatiana C. Matthews		28,600		21,840		50,440
John R. Milleson		30,600		21,840		52,440
Cary C. Nelson		41,400		21,840		63,240
Douglas C. Rinker		30,600		21,840		52,440
Karthik Shyamsunder		14,983		—		14,983
Robert W. Smalley, Jr.		31,000		21,840		52,840
John D. Stokely, Jr.		30,800		21,840		52,640

____________________

(1)

Brandon C. Lorey, the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer, is not included in this table as he receives no compensation for his services as a director. The compensation received by Mr. Lorey as an employee is shown in the Summary Compensation Table on page 13.

(2)

The amounts in this column reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of the awards computed in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation (formerly FASB 123R, Share–Based Payment). The grant date fair value for these stock awards of $36.40 per share was based on the closing sales price

of the Company’s common stock on the grant date (January 2, 2025). At December 31, 2025, each non-employee director had no shares of restricted stock outstanding. During 2025, each director received 600 shares of restricted stock in January, which vested in December.

The Compensation Committee evaluates the compensation of the directors annually. The Compensation Committee relies primarily on information regarding the director compensation of similar financial institutions. Based on this evaluation, the Compensation Committee recommends changes in compensation to the Board of Directors for approval.

Non-employee members of the Board of Directors each receive an annual retainer for service as a member of the Bank’s Board of Directors. During 2025, the Chair of the Board’s retainer was $37,000 and other directors’ retainer was $25,000. The Chairmen of the Audit and Compensation Committees each receive an additional retainer of $4,000 and $2,000, respectively. Members of the Audit Committee and Compensation Committee received $400 per meeting attended. Members of all other Bank committees received $200 per meeting attended during 2025. In addition to cash compensation, non-employee members of the Board of Directors receive stock awards in accordance with the Company’s Stock Incentive Plan, as disclosed in the footnotes of the table above.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

The Company, through its subsidiary Bank, grants loans to and accepts deposits from its directors, principal officers and related parties of such persons during the ordinary course of business. Loans are granted on the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with other customers not related to the Company and do not involve more than the normal risk of collectability or present other unfavorable features. The aggregate balance of loans to directors, principal officers and their related parties was $7,137,470 at December 31, 2025. Deposits are accepted on the same terms, including interest rates, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with other customers. The aggregate balance of deposits from directors, principal officers and their related parties was $6,986,413 at December 31, 2025.

The Company has not adopted a formal policy that covers the review and approval of related person transactions by the Board of Directors. The Board, however, does review all such transactions that are proposed to it for approval. During such a review, the Board will consider, among other things, the related person’s relationship to the Company, the facts and circumstances of the proposed transaction, the aggregate dollar amount of the transaction, the related person’s relationship to the transaction and any other material information. The Audit Committee of the Board also has the responsibility to review significant conflicts of interest involving directors or executive officers.

In addition, any extensions of credit to directors and officers are required to be on substantially the same terms as comparable transactions to non-related parties at the time of the extension of credit, pursuant to Regulation O – Loans to Executive Officers, Directors and Principal Shareholders of Member Banks of the banking regulations applicable to us.

Compensation Policy and Practices Review

The Compensation Committee has authority over the selection, use, and retention of any compensation consultant or any other experts engaged to assist the Committee in discharging its responsibilities. During 2025, the Committee engaged David Jones and Blanchard Consulting Group to act as consultants and independent advisors to the Committee. Mr. Jones has acted as independent compensation consultant to the Board and Compensation Committee of Eagle Financial Services, Inc. for a number of years - most recently as a Principal with Pearl Meyer & Partners LLC, and currently as a single practitioner after his retirement from Pearl Meyer in 2024. Mr. Jones, in collaboration with Blanchard Consulting, assisted the Committee in reviewing compensation strategy and recommending changes to the Company’s peer group, as well as selecting and reviewing compensation and performance data for a peer group of comparable, community financial institutions. Consultants also aided with conducting assessments of compensation policy, plans, practices to address reporting requirements, long term incentive grant determinations, non-qualified deferred compensation, risk assessment of compensation, and stock ownership guidelines; along with providing periodic updates on regulatory and reporting requirement changes related to compensation. In the capacity as advisors to the Compensation Committee, consultants worked directly for the Committee and periodically met with the Committee Chair without the presence of Company management. Additionally, consultants provided consulting to the Company about director compensation and stock ownership guidelines. As a result of the above noted actions, the Committee found that the Company’s compensation policies, plans and practices do not encourage unnecessary or unreasonable risk-taking and do not give rise to risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

The Compensation Committee has assessed the independence of consultants pursuant to the NASDAQ Listing Rules and concluded that consultants’ work for the Compensation Committee does not raise any conflict of interest issues.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

General. The Compensation Committee of the Bank’s Board of Directors reviews the salary and other compensation of executive officers, including the named executive officers, and provides oversight of the compensation programs. The Compensation Committee consists entirely of non-employee, independent members of the Board of Directors and operates under a written charter approved by the Board of Directors. The Compensation Committee establishes and approves the compensation of the President and Chief Executive Officer. The President and Chief Executive Officer recommends the compensation of the other executive officers of the Company and its subsidiary to the Compensation Committee for its review and approval.

Management Say on Pay Vote Results for 2025. At the Company’s 2025 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, approximately 99% of the shareholders who voted on the "say on pay" proposal approved the compensation paid to the Company’s named executive officers. The Compensation Committee believes that the shareholder vote confirms the philosophy and objective of linking our executive compensation to our operating objectives and the enhancement of shareholder value. This level of shareholder support is viewed as an affirmation of the Company’s current pay practices, and as a result, no significant changes were made to our pay practices. The Compensation Committee will continue to consider the outcome of the Company's say on pay votes when making future compensation decisions for the named executive officers.

The Committee evaluates the appropriateness and competitiveness of the Company's total compensation program considering shareholder feedback generally and to ensure the Company's executive compensation program represents the best interests of shareholders. The Committee is committed to performing a thorough assessment and making changes as deemed necessary to attract and retain the highest quality talent, to reward for achieving the Company's objectives, and to align with the best interests of the Company and its shareholders.

At the Company’s 2025 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, the shareholders voted on the frequency with which their advisory vote should be held in the future – every one, two or three years. Consistent with shareholders’ voting, the Company will follow a three-year cycle, and shareholders will be asked to vote on a “say on pay” proposal again in 2028.

Objectives of the Compensation Program. The primary objective of the executive compensation program is to attract and retain highly skilled and motivated executive officers who will manage the company in a manner to promote its growth and profitability and to advance the interest of its shareholders. Additional objectives of our executive compensation program are the following:

•

align executive pay with shareholders’ interests;

•

recognize individual initiative and achievements; and

•

unite the entire executive management team to a common objective.

Executive Compensation Principles. The executive compensation program generally consists of base salaries, annual cash incentive payments in the form of annual bonuses and long-term equity incentives in the form of stock awards. These components of executive compensation are used together to strike an appropriate balance between cash and stock compensation and between short-term and long-term incentives. We expect a portion of an executive officer’s total compensation to be tied both to the Company’s annual and long-term performance as well as to the creation of shareholder value. In particular, we believe that short-term annual cash incentive compensation should be tied directly to both Company performance and individual performance for the fiscal year. In contrast, we believe that the value of long-term incentive compensation should be tied directly to long-term company performance and an increase in shareholder value. Under the program, performance above targeted standards results in increased total compensation, and performance below targeted standards results in decreased total compensation.

We differentiate compensation to executive officers based on the principle that total compensation should increase with an executive officer’s position and responsibility. Executive officers with greater roles and responsibilities associated with achieving performance targets should receive a lesser proportion of the reward if those targets are not achieved and should receive a greater proportion of the reward if those targets are met or surpassed. In addition, as an executive officer’s position and responsibility increases, the use of long-term incentive compensation should increase where executive officers have the greatest influence on strategic performance over time.

How Executive Pay Levels are Determined. The Compensation Committee reviews the executive compensation program and its elements annually. In determining the compensation of the executive officers, the Committee evaluates total overall compensation, as well as the mix of salary, cash bonus incentives and equity incentives, using a number of factors including the following:

•

the Company’s financial and operating performance, measured by attainment of specific strategic objectives and operating results;

•

the duties, responsibilities and performance of each executive officer;

•

historical cash and equity compensation levels; and

•

comparative industry market data to assess compensation competitiveness.

With respect to comparative industry data, the Compensation Committee reviews executive salaries and evaluates compensation structures and the financial performance of comparable companies in a peer group established by the Compensation Committee. The peer group used for comparison purposes is comprised of public companies in the banking industry that are similar in size with similar market capitalizations and other characteristics.

Components of Executive Compensation. The components of the executive compensation program included base annual salary, annual cash incentive payments in the form of bonuses and long-term incentives through equity compensation under the Company’s Stock Incentive Plan. The Company provides retirement benefits through a 401(k) savings plan. The Company also provides health and welfare benefits that include participation in health, dental and vision plans and various insurance plans, including disability and life insurance.

Each of the components of executive compensation is designed to reward and provide incentives to executive officers consistent with the Company’s overall policies and principles on executive compensation. These components and the rationale and methodology for each are described below. Specific information on the amounts and types of compensation earned by the named executive officers during 2025 can be found in the “Summary Compensation Table” and other tables and narrative disclosures following this discussion.

Base Salary: The Company’s philosophy regarding base salary is to provide reasonable current income to the named executive officers in amounts that will attract and retain individuals with a broad, proven track record of performance.

The base salary for the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company is approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. In making determinations regarding compensation for the President and Chief Executive Officer for 2025, the Compensation Committee evaluated the performance of Mr. Lorey based on the Company’s financial performance, achievements in implementing the Company’s long-term strategy, and the personal observations of his performance by the members of the Board of Directors. No particular weight was given to any particular aspects of the performance of the Chief Executive Officer.

Base salaries for executive officers other than the President and Chief Executive Officer are recommended by the President and Chief Executive Officer to the Compensation Committee for review and approval. In making base salary recommendations for 2025, the President and Chief Executive Officer evaluated the performance of the executive officers based on the Company’s financial performance, achievements in implementing the Company’s long-term strategy, and the personal observations of the executive officers’ performance by the Chief Executive Officer. The President and Chief Executive Officer also reviews the salary survey prepared by the Virginia Bankers Association. No particular weight was given to any particular aspects of the performance of the executive officers.

Annual Incentive Bonus: In 2025, the Compensation Committee approved performance metrics under our Senior Officer Incentive Compensation Plan “SOICP”, which sets the target level of executive cash incentives as a percentage of base salary, as further described below, at December 31, 2025. Each of the named executive officers participates in the SOICP.

Executive officers currently have the opportunity to earn an annual incentive award up to a predetermined percentage of total base salary determined by achievement of the Company's operating or consolidated performance goals. In addition to promoting the achievement of corporate performance goals, the incentive awards are designed to align the interests of executive management with those of shareholders in managing a profitable and sound institution.

In 2025, the SOCIP was designed to provide incentives that would be reasonable in relation to the payment of base salaries and overall compensation to executive officers, to be competitive with market and peer group incentive practices, and to provide executive officers the opportunity to earn above-target incentives for above-target performance. Consistent with the design goals of our SOICP, the Compensation Committee determined that 2025 incentive opportunities for the named executive officers should be targeted within a range of 30% to 40% of base salary of the named executive officers. The maximum level of incentive opportunities for named executive officers ranges from 45% to 60% of base salary.

Incentive awards are increased when performance exceeds performance targets, and awards are decreased when performance falls below performance targets. Under the SOICP, incentive awards were realized when actual performance results fell within a range of 85% to 150%. Results that fall below the 85% threshold result in no incentives being awarded. Ultimately, all incentive awards under the 2025 SOICP are at the discretion of the Compensation Committee. Based on discussion with executive management, the Compensation Committee approved the plan performance objectives and the award formula or matrix by which all awards under the 2025 SOICP were calculated. Performance measures were selected based on important priorities for the Company in 2025. The Compensation Committee approved a weight for each performance measure to indicate its relative importance and the percent of overall incentives that could be earned for that particular performance measure.

The financial and operating targets approved by the Compensation Committee for the 2025 Senior Officer Incentive Compensation Plan were return on average assets, noninterest expense to average assets, net deposit growth, the ratio of noninterest income to total income and tangible book value per share of the Company’s common stock. In order for any amounts to be awarded with respect to the five financial and operating targets of the SOICP, the Company’s pretax net income needed to reach 90% of its 2025 target. Additionally, should the Company’s nonperforming assets to total assets ratio have reached 1.25%, awards to the plan participants would have been decreased by 20%. The 2025 incentive award payments to each executive officer are disclosed in the “Summary Compensation Table” below.

Equity Compensation: The Compensation Committee may provide equity compensation to executive officers through long-term stock awards pursuant to the 2023 Stock Incentive Plan. Equity grants have been made to executive officers in the form of restricted stock, which is both time and performance based. The time-based shares vest over a three-year period whereby the executive receives one-third of the shares on each of the three subsequent anniversaries of the grant date if that executive is employed on the anniversary date. Performance-based shares granted in 2022 and 2023 are earned over a two-year performance period with vesting at the end of the first and second year based on performance and service. Performance-based shares granted in 2024 and 2025 are earned at the end of a three year performance period with vesting at the end of the third year based on performance and service. The goal of the Compensation Committee in granting equity compensation is to directly link

an executive’s compensation opportunities with shareholder value creation. The multi-year vesting of stock awards focuses executive officers on consistent long-term growth in shareholder value and requires executive officers to remain employed for extended periods to receive the full benefit of the awards.

On January 2, 2025, the Compensation Committee awarded restricted stock grants to the executive officers. The total amount of stock awards was set based on the executive’s position. The Compensation Committee determined that these stock awards should be split between time and performance-based shares. Our Chief Executive Officer was granted a mix of 50% time-based and 50% performance-based shares (at target); while other named executive officers were granted a mix of 60% time-based and 40% performance-based shares (at target).

The number of time-vested and target number of performance-vested shares for each executive officer are shown in the table below:


Name	Position	Number of Time-vested Shares	Target Number of Performance-vested Shares
Brandon C. Lorey	Chief Executive Officer	3,060	3,060
Kathleen J. Chappell	Chief Financial Officer	1,943	1,295
Joseph T. Zmitrovich	President and Chief Banking Officer, Bank of Clarke	2,327	1,552

The performance-based shares granted in 2025 contained vesting conditions whereby the executive was entitled to receive up to 1.5 times the number of target shares depending upon the Company’s three-year average performance for 2025 through 2027 and vesting three years from the grant date. For performance-vested shares, we measure the Company’s Return on Average Assets “ROAA” percentile ranking versus a custom performance peer group of SEC-reporting banks in Virginia and nearby states with median assets comparable to the Company and generally in a range from half to twice our asset level.

A portion of each executive’s target performance-vested share grant can be earned based on ROAA percentile ranking for the performance periods defined above:


ROAA Performance Percentile Rank
Below 25th Percentile	25th Percentile	50th Percentile	75th Percentile
Portion of Target Performance-vested Share Earned
None	0.5 times Target	Target	1.5 times Target

For ROAA percentile ranking that falls between the percentiles shown above, straight-line interpolation is used to determine the portion of target award earned. Number of earned shares is capped at 1.5 times target. A participant must be employed on the vesting date of each performance period to receive shares earned for performance during that period.

Retirement and Other Benefits: The Company provides additional compensation to the named executive officers through various plans which are also available to some or all of the employees. The Compensation Committee oversees these plans and the Compensation Committee considers these plans when reviewing a named executive officer’s total annual compensation and when determining the annual and long-term compensation components described above. These plans are described below.

Employee 401(k) Savings and Stock Ownership Plan

The Company sponsors a 401(k) savings plan under which eligible employees, including executive officers, may defer a portion of their salary on a pretax basis, subject to certain IRS limits. The 401(k) plan was amended, effective January 1, 2007, to include a non-elective safe-harbor employer contribution and an age-weighted employer contribution. Qualifying employees will receive a non-elective safe-harbor contribution equal to three percent of their salary with each payroll period during the year. Also, each December 31st, qualifying employees will receive an additional contribution based on their age and years of service. The percentage of salary for the age-weighted contribution increases on both factors, age and years of service, with a minimum of one percent of salary and a maximum of ten percent of salary.

In 2025, all executive officers participated in the 401(k) plan and each received all eligible matching contributions under the amended plan. The Company’s contribution to this plan on behalf of each named executive is disclosed in the “Summary Compensation Table” below.

Employment Agreements. In order to retain and attract executive officers, the Company recognizes the need to enter into employment agreements with provisions for benefits in connection with a termination of employment. The Compensation Committee evaluates the potential payments to executive officers under various arrangements that provide for severance payments, including termination and change of control arrangements, in connection with its annual review of executive compensation.

A description of the terms of our severance plans, the specific circumstances that trigger payment of benefits, an estimate of benefits payable upon the occurrence of those triggering events and other information relating to such plans can be found under the captions of “Employment Agreements” and “Potential Payments upon Termination of Employment or Change-in-Control” below.

Annual Compensation of Executive Officers

The following tables and discussion summarize the compensation earned during 2025 and 2024 by (1) the individual serving as chief executive officer during 2025 and (2) each of the two other most highly compensated executive officers who earned more than $100,000 in total compensation for services rendered in all capacities during 2025.

Summary Compensation Table

      
     Non-

      
     Equity

      
     Incentive

      
     Plan

     All Other

      
     Stock

     Compen-