DEF 14A

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Filed by the Registrant ☒

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☐

Check the appropriate box:

☐	Preliminary Proxy Statement

☐	Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

☒	Definitive Proxy Statement

☐	Definitive Additional Materials

☐	Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-11(c) or §240.14a-12

McGrath RentCorp

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

☒	No fee required.

☐	Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

☐	Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

☐	Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the form or schedule and the date of its filing.

McGRATH RENTCORP

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

To Be Held December 12, 2024

To the Shareholders of McGrath RentCorp:

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of McGrath RentCorp, a California corporation (the “Company”), will be held virtually only at www.proxydocs.com/MGRC, on Thursday, December 12, 2024, at 2:00 p.m., PST. Shareholders will be able to listen, vote, and submit questions from any remote location that has internet connectivity. There will be no physical location for shareholders to attend. The Annual Meeting will be held for the following purposes:

1. To elect six (6) directors of the Company, as specifically set forth in the attached proxy statement, to serve until the 2025 Annual Meeting of Shareholders or until their successors are elected and qualified;

2. To ratify the appointment of Grant Thornton LLP as the independent auditors for the Company for the year ending December 31, 2024;

3. To approve, in a non-binding vote, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers; and

4. To transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting and any adjournment or postponement thereof.

The foregoing items of business are more fully described in the proxy statement which is attached and made a part hereof (the “Proxy Statement”).

The Board of Directors of the Company has fixed the close of business on October 22, 2024, as the record date for determining the shareholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting and any adjournment or postponement thereof.

I M P O R T A N T

We are holding the Annual Meeting as a virtual meeting (via live audio webcast) format only. On behalf of the Board of Directors and management of the Company, we cordially invite you to attend the Annual Meeting by virtual presence by logging into our live webcast at: www.proxydocs.com/MGRC. Through this webcast, shareholders and proxyholders will be deemed to be present in person for purposes of conducting a vote at such meeting. In order to attend this webcast, you must register in advance at www.proxydocs.com/MGRC prior to the deadline of Thursday, December 12, 2024, at 1:00 p.m. Pacific Time, as more fully described in the accompanying Proxy Statement.

In accordance with rules established by the Securities and Exchange Commission, we are providing you access to our proxy materials over the Internet. Accordingly, we plan to mail a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) to our shareholders on or about October 31, 2024. The Notice will describe how to access and review our proxy materials, including our Proxy Statement and Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023. The Notice, as well as our proxy card, will also describe how you may submit your proxy electronically. If you received just a Notice by mail and would like to receive a printed copy of our proxy materials, you should follow the instructions for requesting such materials included in the Notice.

Whether or not you expect to attend the Annual Meeting via virtual presence, please vote your shares by following the instructions on the Notice, your proxy card or your voting instruction form, as applicable, as promptly as possible in order to ensure your representation at the Annual Meeting. Even if you have voted by proxy, you may still vote online if you attend the Annual Meeting via virtual presence. Please note, however, that if your shares are held of record by a broker, bank, or other nominee and you wish to vote at the Annual Meeting, you must obtain a proxy card issued in your name from such broker, bank, or other nominee and register for the Annual Meeting in advance through our transfer agent, Computershare Trust Company, N.A. Once proof of your proxy power (legal proxy) has been obtained, send the proof reflecting your holdings along with your name and email address to legalproxy@betanxt.com to obtain your 12-digit control number. Registration must be received no later than 5:00 p.m., Eastern time, on Friday, December 6, 2024.

If you hold your shares in a brokerage account, your shares will not be voted in the election of directors or the non-binding, advisory vote on the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers unless you provide explicit instructions to your broker as to how you wish to vote your shares. Under the NASDAQ Stock Market rules governing discretionary voting of proxies by the exchange’s members, your broker is not permitted to vote shares with respect to non-routine matters such as the election of directors or the vote on compensation without voting instructions from the beneficial owner of such shares.

By Order of the Board of Directors,

Gilda Malek

Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary

Livermore, California

October 30, 2024

McGRATH RENTCORP

5700 Las Positas Road

Livermore, California 94551

PROXY STATEMENT

FOR 2024 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

General Information

This proxy statement (this “Proxy Statement”) is made available to the shareholders of McGrath RentCorp, a California corporation (the “Company,” “we,” “us,” or “our”), in connection with the solicitation by the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board of Directors” or the “Board”) of proxies in the accompanying form for use in voting at the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Company (the “Annual Meeting”) to be held on Thursday, December 12, 2024, at 2:00 p.m., PST, via virtual meeting only at www.proxydocs.com/MGRC, and any adjournment or postponement thereof. There will be no physical location for shareholders to attend. The shares represented by the proxies received, properly marked, dated, executed, and not revoked will be voted at the Annual Meeting.

This year, we are using the Internet as the primary means of delivery of proxy materials to our shareholders. We are sending a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) to our shareholders of record with instructions on how to access the proxy materials online at www.proxydocs.com/MGRC. The Company expects to mail the Notice to shareholders on or about October 31, 2024.

The rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) require us to notify our shareholders of the availability of our proxy materials through the Internet.

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials

for the Shareholder Meeting to be held on Thursday, December 12, 2024

Our Proxy Statement and 2023 Annual Report to Shareholders are available at

www.proxydocs.com/MGRC

The following questions and answers provide important information about the Annual Meeting and this Proxy Statement:

When is the Annual Meeting?

The Annual Meeting will be held on Thursday, December 12, 2024, at 2:00 p.m., PST, via virtual meeting only. There will be no physical meeting to attend. All of the members of the Board of Directors and our entire management team will participate via virtual presence only.

How do I participate in the virtual Annual Meeting?

You will not be able to attend the Annual Meeting physically. You or your proxyholder may participate, vote, and ask questions at the Annual Meeting by visiting www.proxydocs.com/MGRC and using your 12-digit control number found on your Notice.

To be admitted to the virtual Annual Meeting, you will need the 12-digit control number included on your Notice, or the instructions that accompanied your proxy materials, as applicable. The Annual Meeting will begin promptly at 2:00 p.m., PST. Online check-in will begin at 1:00 p.m., PST, and you should allow ample time for the online check-in procedures. If you have difficulty accessing the virtual Annual Meeting, please follow the instructions from your registration confirmation email.

If you hold shares through an intermediary, such as a bank, broker or other nominee, you will need to contact such bank, broker or other nominee to request a legal proxy and register for the Annual Meeting in advance through our transfer agent, Computershare Trust Company, N.A. (“Computershare”). Once proof of your proxy power (legal proxy) has been obtained, send the proof reflecting your holdings along with your name and email address to legalproxy@betanxt.com to obtain your 12-digit control number. Registration must be received no later than 5:00 p.m., EST, on Friday, December 6, 2024.

This year’s shareholders’ question and answer session will include questions submitted live during the Annual Meeting. You may submit a question in advance of the Annual Meeting by sending it via electronic mail to investor@mgrc.com. Questions may be submitted during the Annual Meeting through www.proxydocs.com/MGRC. We expect to respond to appropriate questions during the Annual Meeting, and may also respond to questions on an individual basis or by posting answers on our Investor Relations website after the meeting.

What matters will be considered at the Annual Meeting?

Shareholders will vote on the following items at the Annual Meeting:

To elect six (6) directors of the Company, as specifically set forth in this Proxy Statement, to serve until the 2025 Annual Meeting of Shareholders or until their successors are elected and qualified (Proposal No. 1);

To ratify the appointment of Grant Thornton LLP as the independent auditors for the Company for the year ending December 31, 2024 (Proposal No. 2);

To approve, in a non-binding vote, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers (Proposal No. 3); and

To transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting and any adjournment or postponement thereof.

How does the Board of Directors recommend that shareholders vote on these matters?

The Board of Directors believes that the election of the nominated directors, the ratification of the appointment of Grant Thornton LLP, and the approval on an advisory basis of the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers are in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders and, accordingly, recommends a vote “FOR” the approval of each of these proposals.

How are proxy materials being made available to shareholders?

The SEC adopted amendments to the proxy rules that change how companies must provide proxy materials. These rules are often referred to as “Notice and Access.” Under the Notice and Access model, a company may select either of the following two options for making proxy materials available to shareholders:

•

the full set delivery option; or

•

the notice only option.

Full Set Delivery Option

Under the full set delivery option, a company delivers all proxy materials to its shareholders as it would have done prior to the change in the rules. This can be by mail or, if a shareholder has previously agreed, by e-mail. In addition to delivering proxy materials to shareholders, a company must post all proxy materials on a publicly-accessible website and provide information to shareholders about how to access that website. The Company’s proxy materials are available on the following website: www.proxydocs.com/MGRC.

Notice Only Option

Under the notice only delivery option, a company must post all of its proxy materials on a publicly accessible website. However, instead of delivering its proxy materials to shareholders, the company instead delivers a one-page notice of internet availability of proxy materials which includes, among other matters:

•

information regarding the date, time, and location of the Annual Meeting of Shareholders as well as the items to be considered at the meeting;

•

information regarding the website where the proxy materials are posted; and

•

various means by which a shareholder may request paper or e-mail copies of the proxy materials.

A company may use a single method for all of its shareholders or use full set delivery for some while adopting the notice only option for others. The Company is required to comply with these Notice and Access rules in connection with its Annual Meeting and has elected to provide access to our proxy materials over the Internet. Accordingly, we have sent you a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) because the Board of Directors is soliciting your proxy to vote at the Annual Meeting, including at any adjournments or postponements of the Annual Meeting. All shareholders will have the ability to access the proxy materials on the website referred to in the Notice or request to receive a printed set of proxy materials. Instructions on how to access the proxy materials over the Internet or to request a printed copy may be found in the Notice.

We intend to mail the Notice on or about October 31, 2024, to all shareholders of record entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.

What is the difference between a shareholder of record and a beneficial owner of shares held in street name?

Shareholder of Record. If your shares are registered directly in your name with the Company’s transfer agent, Computershare, then you are considered the shareholder of record with respect to those shares, and the Notice was sent directly to you by the Company.

Beneficial Owner of Shares Held in Street Name. If your shares are held in an account at a brokerage firm, bank, broker-dealer, or other similar organization, then you are the beneficial owner of shares held in “street name,” and the Notice was forwarded to you by that organization. The organization holding your account is considered the shareholder of record for purposes of voting at the Annual Meeting. As a beneficial owner, you have the right to direct that organization on how to vote the shares held in your account.

How do I vote?

To vote through the internet, go to www.proxydocs.com/MGRC to complete an electronic proxy card. You will be asked to provide the company number and control number from the Notice. You must cast your vote by 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time on December 11, 2024.

To vote using the proxy card, simply complete, sign and date the proxy card that may be delivered and return it promptly in the envelope provided. If you return your signed proxy card to us before the Annual Meeting, we will vote your shares as you direct.

To vote over the telephone, dial toll-free 866.390.5401 using a touch-tone phone and follow the recorded instructions. You will be asked to provide the company number and control number from the Notice. You must cast your telephone vote by 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time on December 11, 2024.

What does it mean if I received more than one Notice?

If you received more than one Notice, it may mean that you hold shares registered in more than one account. Please follow the voting instructions on the Notices to ensure that all of your shares are voted. If you have any questions regarding your share information or address appearing on the Notice, you may call Computershare, the Company’s transfer agent, at (800) 962-4284 if you are a shareholder of record, or contact your brokerage firm, bank, broker-dealer, or other similar organization if you are a beneficial owner of shares held in “street name.”

Can I change my vote after I have voted?

You may revoke your proxy and change your vote at any time before the final vote at the Annual Meeting. You may vote again on a later date by signing and returning a new proxy card with a later date or by attending the Annual Meeting and voting via online presence at our virtual meeting. However, your attendance at the Annual Meeting via online presence will not automatically revoke your proxy unless you vote again at the Annual Meeting or specifically request that your prior proxy be revoked by delivering a written notice of revocation to the Company’s Corporate Secretary at 5700 Las Positas Road, Livermore, California 94551 prior to the Annual Meeting. See “May I vote my shares via online presence at the virtual Annual Meeting?” below.

Who is entitled to vote?

The close of business on October 22, 2024, has been fixed as the record date (the “Record Date”) for determining the holders of shares of common stock of the Company, no par value (“Common Stock”), entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting.

What constitutes a quorum?

As of the close of business on the Record Date, there were 24,551,184 shares of Common Stock outstanding and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. The presence at the Annual Meeting of a majority of these shares of Common Stock, either in person by online presence or by proxy, will constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at the Annual Meeting.

How are votes counted and who will count the votes?

Each outstanding share of Common Stock on the Record Date is entitled to one vote on each matter properly brought before the Annual Meeting. However, in compliance with the General Corporation Law of the State of California, if a candidate nominated for election to the Board of Directors has had such candidate’s name placed in nomination prior to the shareholder vote and a shareholder gives notice, prior to the voting, of such shareholders’ intention to cumulate such shareholder’s votes, then (and only then) every shareholder voting for the election of directors will be entitled to cumulate such shareholder’s votes for the election of directors and give one candidate a number of votes equal to the number of directors to be elected (six) multiplied by the number of shares held or may distribute such shareholder’s votes on the same principle among as many candidates as the shareholder may select. If, in connection with the election of directors, cumulative voting is selected, then the six candidates receiving the highest number of affirmative votes shall be elected.

It is intended that shares represented by proxies in the accompanying form will be voted for the election of persons nominated by management. If votes are cast for any candidates other than those nominated by the Board of Directors, the persons authorized to vote shares represented by executed proxies in the enclosed form (if authority to vote for the election of Directors or for any particular nominee is not withheld) will have full discretion and authority to vote cumulatively and allocate votes among any or all of the nominees of the Board of Directors in such order and in such numbers as they may determine in their sole discretion, provided all the above-listed requirements for cumulative voting are met.

An automated system administered by BetaNXT will tabulate votes cast by proxy and Gilda Malek, the Company’s Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary, will act as the inspector of elections to tabulate votes cast via online presence at the Annual Meeting.

Is my vote confidential?

Proxy instructions, ballots, and voting tabulations that identify individual shareholders are handled in a manner that protects your voting privacy. Your vote will not be disclosed either within the Company or to third parties, except:

•

as necessary to meet applicable legal requirements;

•

to allow for the tabulation and certification of votes; and

•

to facilitate a successful proxy solicitation.

Occasionally, shareholders provide written comments on their proxy cards, which may be forwarded to the Company’s management and the Board of Directors.

How are abstentions and broker “non-votes” treated?

Under the General Corporation Law of the State of California, an abstaining vote and a broker “non-vote” are counted as present and are, therefore, included for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present at the Annual Meeting. However, abstentions are not included in determining the number of shares voting on the proposals submitted to shareholders. Generally, a broker “non-vote” occurs when a nominee (such as a brokerage firm, bank, broker-dealer, or other similar organization) holding shares for a beneficial owner in “street name” does not vote on a particular matter because the nominee does not have discretionary voting power with respect to that matter and has not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner. Broker “non-votes,” and shares as to which proxy authority has been withheld with respect to any matter, are not deemed to be entitled to vote for purposes of determining whether shareholders’ approval of that matter has been obtained.

What is the voting requirement to approve each of the proposals?

With respect to Proposal No. 1 of this Proxy Statement, a plurality of the votes cast is required for the election of directors. This means that the director nominee with the most votes for a particular slot is elected for that slot. You may vote “FOR” or “WITHHELD” with respect to the election of directors, unless prior to the vote on the election of directors a shareholder has validly given notice of its intent to cumulate votes, in which case you may allocate votes (six per share of Common Stock held) among all director nominees. In the absence of cumulative voting, only votes “FOR” or “WITHHELD” are counted in determining whether a plurality has been cast in favor of a director. Abstentions and broker “non-votes,” if any, will have no effect on this proposal. Brokerage firms, banks, broker-dealers, and other nominees holding shares for holders who have not given specific voting instructions are not permitted to vote in their discretion with respect to Proposal No. 1. If you do not instruct your broker how to vote, your broker may not vote with respect to this proposal and these votes will be counted as broker “non-votes,” as is described in “What happens if I do not give specific voting instructions?” below. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines set forth our procedures if a director-nominee is elected, but receives a majority of “WITHHELD” votes. In an uncontested election, any director nominee who receives a greater number of votes “WITHHELD” from his or her election than votes “FOR” such election is required to tender his or her resignation following certification of the shareholder vote. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee is required to make recommendations to the Board of Directors with respect to any such letter of resignation. The Board of Directors is required to take action with respect to this recommendation within 90 days following certification of the shareholder vote and to disclose its decision-making process.

With respect to Proposal No. 2 of this Proxy Statement, the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of Common Stock present or represented and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting is required. You may vote

“FOR” or “AGAINST” with respect to the appointment of Grant Thornton LLP as the independent auditors for the Company for the year ending December 31, 2024. Abstentions will have the same effect as voting against this proposal. Because the ratification of auditors is considered a “routine” matter for which brokers may vote in the absence of shareholder direction, there will not be any broker “non-votes” on this proposal.

With respect to Proposal No. 3 of this Proxy Statement, the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of Common Stock present or represented and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting is required for approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers. You may vote “FOR” or “AGAINST” with respect to approval of the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers. Abstentions will have the same effect as voting against this proposal. Broker “non-votes,” if any, will have no effect on this proposal.

What happens if I do not give specific voting instructions?

For Shares Directly Registered in the Name of the Shareholder: If you return your signed proxy but do not indicate your voting preferences, the Company will vote on your behalf “FOR” the election of the nominated directors, “FOR” the ratification of the appointment of Grant Thornton LLP and “FOR” approval of the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers. If any other matter properly comes before the shareholders for a vote at the Annual Meeting, the proxyholders will vote your shares in accordance with their best judgment.

For Shares Registered in the Name of a Brokerage Firm, Bank, Broker-Dealer or Other Similar Organization: If your shares are held in street name, your brokerage firm, bank, broker-dealer, or nominee will ask you how you want your shares to be voted. If you provide voting instructions, your shares must be voted as you direct. If you do not furnish voting instructions with respect to shares registered in the name of organizations that are not governed by FINRA Rule 2251, those shares will not be voted at the meeting because such organizations do not have discretionary voting power. If you do not furnish voting instructions to brokerage firms that are governed by FINRA Rule 2251, one of two things can happen, depending upon whether a proposal is “routine.” Under FINRA Rule 2251, brokerage firms, banks, broker-dealers, and other similar organizations have the discretion to cast votes on routine matters, such as the ratification of the appointment of an independent auditor (as requested in Proposal No. 2), without voting instructions from their clients. Brokerage firms, banks, broker-dealers, and other similar organizations are not permitted, however, to cast votes on “non-routine” matters, such as the election of directors (as requested in Proposal No. 1) or votes on the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers (as requested in Proposal No. 3), without such voting instructions.

May I vote my shares via online presence at the virtual Annual Meeting?

For Shares Directly Registered in the Name of the Shareholder: Yes. To be admitted to the virtual Annual Meeting, and to vote via online presence at the Annual Meeting, you will need the 12-digit control number included on your Notice.

For Shares Registered in the Name of a Brokerage Firm or Bank: Yes, but in order to do so you will need to contact such bank, broker, or other nominee to request a legal proxy and register for the Annual Meeting in advance through our transfer agent, Computershare. Once proof of your proxy power (legal proxy) has been obtained, send the proof reflecting your holdings along with your name and email address to legalproxy@computershare.com to obtain your 12-digit control number. Registration must be received no later than 5:00 p.m., EST, on Friday, December 6, 2024.

Your online attendance at the Annual Meeting in and of itself will not automatically revoke a proxy that was submitted earlier by mail.

Where can I find the voting results of the Annual Meeting?

The preliminary voting results will be announced at the Annual Meeting. The final voting results will be tallied by the inspector of elections and reported in a current report on Form 8-K to be filed by the Company within four business days following the date of the Annual Meeting.

Who pays for this proxy solicitation?

The Company will bear the entire cost of soliciting proxies, including the costs of preparing, assembling, printing, and mailing this Proxy Statement, the proxy, and any additional soliciting material furnished to shareholders by the Company. Arrangements will be made with brokerage firms, banks, broker-dealers, nominees, and fiduciaries to send proxies and proxy materials to the beneficial owners of our Common Stock, and these entities may be reimbursed by the Company for their expenses. Proxies may be solicited by directors, officers, or employees of the Company in person or by telephone, e-mail, or other means. No additional compensation will be paid to such individuals for these services.

What is the deadline for receipt of shareholder proposals?

Our Annual Meeting is being held later in calendar year 2024 than prior years as a result of our previously announced merger with WillScot Mobile Mini Holdings Corp., which has since been mutually terminated as previously announced and reported on our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 18, 2024. We plan to return to our regular annual meeting schedule in 2025, including with respect to deadlines for shareholder proposals and director nominations, and we expect that our 2025 annual meeting of shareholders (the “2025 Annual Meeting”) will be held in June 2025. If the timing of the 2025 Annual Meeting changes, we will announce such change in advance in a Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q or a Current Report on Form 8-K.

Pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), shareholders may present proper proposals for inclusion in our proxy statement and for consideration at our next annual meeting of shareholders. As we expect our 2025 Annual Meeting to convene more than 30 days before the anniversary of the Annual Meeting, to be eligible for inclusion in our 2025 proxy statement, a shareholder’s proposal received by us must otherwise comply with Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act, and must be received by us by a reasonable time before we begin to print and send our proxy materials for the 2025 Annual Meeting. While our Board of Directors will consider shareholder proposals that are properly brought before the 2025 Annual Meeting, we reserve the right to omit from our 2025 proxy statement shareholder proposals that we are not required to include under the Exchange Act, including Rule 14a-8 thereunder. We will announce the specific date by which such proposals must be received by us in a Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q or a Current Report on Form 8-K.

Shareholders may propose director candidates for consideration by our Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. In addition to being timely submitted to the Compliance Officer of the Company at our principal executive offices by the deadline described below, any such proposal must include all of the required information listed under “Shareholder Recommendations for Membership on our Board of Directors.” As we expect our 2025 Annual Meeting to convene more than 30 days before the anniversary of the Annual Meeting, any shareholder director nominee intended to be presented at the 2025 Annual Meeting must be received by the Compliance Officer by a reasonable time before we begin to print and send our proxy materials for the 2025 Annual Meeting. We will announce the specific date by which such shareholder director nominees must be received by us in a Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q or a Current Report on Form 8-K.

Shareholders are advised to review our bylaws, which contain additional requirements with respect to advance notice of shareholder proposals and director nominations.

In addition to satisfying the requirements under our bylaws, to comply with the universal proxy rules, shareholders who intend to solicit proxies in support of director nominees other than those nominated by us must provide timely notice in the manner prescribed by, and that sets forth the information required by, Rule 14a-19 under the Exchange Act.

Householding of Annual Meeting Materials

To the extent we deliver paper copies of our annual report to security holders, Proxy Statement, or Notice, as applicable, the SEC rules allow us to deliver a single copy of such proxy materials to any household at which two or more shareholders reside, if we believe the shareholders are members of the same family.

We will promptly deliver, upon oral or written request, a separate copy of our annual report to security holders, proxy statement, or Notice to any shareholder residing at the same address as another shareholder and currently receiving only one copy of such proxy materials who wishes to receive his or her own copy. Similarly, multiple shareholders residing at the same residence that are currently receiving separate copies of our annual report to security holders, proxy statement or Notice may request that a single copy of such proxy materials be delivered. We will promptly deliver a separate copy of these documents without charge to you upon written request to McGrath RentCorp, 5700 Las Positas Road, Livermore, California 94551 Attn: Investor Relations. If you want to receive separate copies of our proxy materials in the future, or if you are receiving multiple copies and would like to receive only one copy per household, you should contact your brokerage firm, bank, broker-dealer, or other nominee who is a record holder, or you may contact us at the address listed above.

Financial and Other Information

We are required to file annual, quarterly, and current reports, proxy statements and other reports with the SEC. Copies of these filings are available through our Internet website at www.mgrc.com under the Investors section or the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. We will furnish copies of our SEC filings (without exhibits), including our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023, and filed with the SEC on February 21, 2024, as amended on Form 10-K/A filed with the SEC on April 16, 2024 (the “2023 Annual Report”), without charge to any shareholder upon written request to McGrath RentCorp, 5700 Las Positas Road, Livermore, California 94551 Attn: Investor Relations.

PROPOSAL NO. 1

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

The Company’s bylaws authorize the number of directors to be not less than five (5) and not more than nine (9). The Board of Directors is currently fixed at six (6) directors and composed of the following directors whose terms will expire upon the election and qualification of directors at the Annual Meeting: Nicolas C. Anderson, Kimberly A. Box, Smita Conjeevaram, William J. Dawson, Joseph F. Hanna, and Bradley M. Shuster. At each Annual Meeting of shareholders, directors will be elected for full terms of one year to succeed those directors whose terms are expiring.

At the 2024 Annual Meeting, the shareholders will elect six (6) directors. Messrs. Anderson, Dawson, Hanna, and Shuster and Mses. Box and Conjeevaram each have been nominated to serve a one-year term, until the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held in 2025, until their successors are elected or appointed and qualified, or until their earlier death, resignation, or removal. The Board of Directors has no reason to believe that any of Messrs. Anderson, Dawson, Hanna, or Shuster or Mses. Box or Conjeevaram will be unable or unwilling to serve as a nominee or as a director if elected.

Nominees

The names of the nominees and certain information about them as of October 22, 2024, are set forth below.


Name of Nominee	Age	Principal Occupation	Director Since
Nicolas C. Anderson	40	Managing Partner of Elm Grove Partners and Chief Executive Officer of ArcherHall		2022
Kimberly A. Box	64	Former President and Chief Executive Officer of Gatekeeper Innovation, Inc.		2018
Smita Conjeevaram	63	Former Chief Financial Officer of Fortress Investment Group LLC		2021
William J. Dawson	70	Former Chief Financial Officer of Adamas Pharmaceuticals, Inc.		1998
Joseph F. Hanna	61	Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company		2017
Bradley M. Shuster	69	Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company and Executive Chairman and Chairman of the Board of NMI Holdings, Inc.		2017

Nicolas C. Anderson was elected a director of the Company in December 2022. He is the founder and Managing Partner of Elm Grove Partners, an entrepreneurial private equity firm specializing in control investments in established lower middle-market companies. Since 2013, Mr. Anderson has had primary responsibility for raising equity capital and debt financing, as well as leading investment analysis for potential acquisitions. He also serves as Chief Executive Officer of ArcherHall, an Elm Grove Partners portfolio company that provides data and document management services to law firms. Under his leadership, ArcherHall, has transformed from a local legal copy business into one of the largest independent digital forensics firms in the United States. Previously, Mr. Anderson worked at JPMorgan in New York, as well as at two boutique investment banks. During his Wall Street career, he worked on transactions totaling over a billion dollars, including equipment lease financing, mortgage-backed securities, and other complex securitizations, alongside traditional debt and equity financing. He held the Series 7 and Series 63 securities licenses. Mr. Anderson currently serves on the board of the Bank of Marin (NASDAQ: BMRC), where he is chair of the Audit Committee and a member of both the Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Governance Committee. He is also on the board of YMCA of Superior California, serving on both its Audit and Finance Committees. Previously, he served on the board of American River Bank (NASDAQ: AMRB), where he chaired the Directors Loan Committee and was a member of the Nominating and Audit Committees, as well as a special committee focused on M&A opportunities. Mr. Anderson received an AB in Economics from Harvard University and an MBA with Distinction from Harvard Business School.

As an experienced public company independent director, chief executive, private equity investor, and entrepreneur, Mr. Anderson brings valuable leadership in finance to the Board of Directors.

Kimberly A. Box was elected a director of the Company in 2018 and currently serves as Chair, Compensation Committee. Ms. Box was previously the President and Chief Executive Officer of Gatekeeper Innovation, Inc., a healthcare company that creates products to keep medications safe. She joined the company in 2016. Prior to joining Gatekeeper Innovation, Ms. Box enjoyed a successful 29-year career with Hewlett Packard (NYSE: HPQ), holding various executive positions, the most recent being Vice President Global IT Services, a position she held until 2009 when she left Hewlett Packard. Ms. Box also serves on the Board of Directors of Applied Science, Inc. (“ASI”) and formerly American River Bank (NASDAQ: AMRB) until it was acquired in 2021. Ms. Box holds a Bachelor of Science in Business Administration with a concentration in Management and a minor in Computer Science from California State University, Chico. She also completed the Executive Development Program at The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania and has a NACD Directorship Certification^™ (2021) and a CERT in Cybersecurity Oversight from the Software Engineering Institute at Carnegie Mellon University (2022). Ms. Box is on the NACD Northern California Chapter board and recently served as the Chair, and was named to the NACD Directorship 100^™, an annual recognition of the leading corporate directors who significantly impact boardroom practices and performance.

With her diverse cross-industry experience in the information technology and healthcare industries, Ms. Box brings a unique perspective and valuable experience to the Board of Directors. Additionally, Ms. Box’s special skills include experience with global leadership, digital transformation, mergers and acquisitions, strategic leadership, IT systems and cybersecurity, managed outsourced services, and community engagement. Ms. Box also has ample public board and committee chair experience.

Smita Conjeevaram was elected a director of the Company in January 2021 and currently serves as Chair, Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. Ms. Conjeevaram previously served as Chief Financial Officer of Credit Hedge Funds & Deputy Chief Financial Officer of the Credit Funds for Fortress Investment Group LLC from 2010 to 2013. She also previously served as Chief Financial Officer for Everquest Financial LLC; Strategic Value Partners, LLC; ESL Investments, Inc.; and Sentinel Advisors, LLC. She is a CPA with experience at Price Waterhouse as Manager, International Tax—Financial Services Group and at Ernst & Young as Senior, General Tax. Ms. Conjeevaram serves on the Board of Directors of SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SSNC), SkyWest, Inc. (NASDAQ: SKYW), and WisdomTree Investments, Inc. (NYSE: WT). Ms. Conjeevaram has a B.S., Accounting and Business Administration, Magna Cum Laude, from Butler University, Indianapolis, Indiana and a B.A., Economics from Ethiraj College, Madras, India.

Ms. Conjeevaram’s leadership in the financial industry as well as her accounting and compliance background bring significant and valuable experience to the Board of Directors. Additionally, Ms. Conjeevaram’s special skills include experience in the technology industry; investment, finance, and accounting; and risk management. She also has extensive public board and committee member experience and is an Audit Committee financial expert per the listing standards of the NASDAQ Stock Market. The Company and Ms. Conjeevaram believe that she has sufficient time and attention to devote to her responsibilities as a director of the Company.

William J. Dawson was elected a director of the Company in 1998 and currently serves as Chair, Audit Committee. Mr. Dawson previously served as the Chief Financial Officer at Adamas Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NASDAQ: ADMS), a specialty pharmaceutical company, from 2014 until his retirement in 2017, where he consulted in 2013 until he joined as CFO in 2014. He also previously served as Chief Financial Officer at Catalyst Biosciences, Inc., a then privately-held biotechnology company, for two years from 2010 to 2012 and he was Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of Cerus Corporation (NASDAQ: CERS), a publicly held biopharmaceutical company, from August 2004 to April 2009. Prior to joining Cerus, he spent a total of 26 years in senior financial positions at companies in biotechnology, healthcare services and information technology, investment banking, energy, and transportation. As an investment banker, Mr. Dawson assisted in

three public equity offerings for the Company, beginning with its initial public offering in 1984. Mr. Dawson received an A.B. in Mechanical Engineering from Stanford University and an M.B.A. from Harvard Business School.

With his wealth of experience in financial and strategic transactions, as well as his experiences in the transportation, technology, and energy industries, and as Chief Financial Officer of publicly traded companies, Mr. Dawson provides significant value to the Board of Directors. Additionally, Mr. Dawson’s special skills include experience with mergers and acquisitions; finance, accounting, and SEC filings; capital markets; business development; IT systems and cybersecurity; strategic and corporate development; stockholder engagement; and philanthropic and community engagement. Mr. Dawson also has extensive public board and committee chair experience and is an Audit Committee financial expert per the listing standards of the NASDAQ Stock Market.

Joseph F. Hanna was appointed President, Chief Executive Officer and a director of the Company in February 2017 after serving 14 years in positions of progressive responsibility. Mr. Hanna served as the Chief Operating Officer of the Company from 2007 to 2017. From 2005 to 2007, he served as Senior Vice President of Operations, and he joined the Company in 2003 as Vice President of Operations. Mr. Hanna has been instrumental in developing and driving the strategic product and geographic expansion of the Company’s varied rental businesses throughout his tenure. He is well qualified to serve as Chief Executive Officer and as a member of the Board of Directors because of his deep institutional knowledge of the Company, its products, services, strategies, and customers. Mr. Hanna also serves as a member of the Board of Directors of Janus International Group (NYSE: JBI), the leading global provider of self-storage and commercial industrial doors, relocatable storage units, facility automation solutions, and door replacement and self-storage restoration services, since January 2024. Previously Mr. Hanna held various sales and operational leadership positions at SMC Corporation of America (a subsidiary of SMC Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). His prior experience also includes serving as an officer in the United States Army. Mr. Hanna received a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from the United States Military Academy, West Point, New York.

Bradley M. Shuster was elected a director of the Company in 2017 and Chairman of the Board in 2021. He previously held the position of Vice-Chairman from 2020 to 2021. Mr. Shuster has served as Executive Chairman and Chairman of the Board of NMI Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: NMIH) since January 2019. Mr. Shuster founded National MI and served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the company from 2012 to 2018. Prior to founding National MI, Mr. Shuster was a senior executive of The PMI Group, Inc. (NYSE: PMI), where he served as Chief Executive Officer of PMI Capital Corporation. Before joining PMI in 1995, Mr. Shuster was a partner at Deloitte LLP, where he served as partner-in-charge of Deloitte’s Northern California Insurance and Mortgage Banking practices. He also serves as an independent director of WaFd, Inc. (NASDAQ: WAFD). He holds a B.S. from the University of California, Berkeley and an M.B.A. from the University of California, Los Angeles. Mr. Shuster has received both CPA and CFA certifications. Additionally, Mr. Shuster completed the National Association of Corporate Directors Cyber-Risk Oversight Program, earning the CERT Certificate in Cybersecurity Oversight.

With his extensive experience in the financial sector, as well as his experiences as Executive Chairman and as a senior executive of various publicly traded companies, Mr. Shuster provides significant value to the Board of Directors. Additionally, Mr. Shuster’s special skills include experience with mergers and acquisitions; finance, accounting, and investments; business development and operations; strategic and corporate development; and stockholder engagement. Mr. Shuster also has extensive public board and committee chair experience and is an Audit Committee financial expert per the listing standards of the NASDAQ Stock Market.

Required Vote

The nominees will be elected by a plurality of the votes cast. Abstentions and broker “non-votes,” if any, will not be counted toward the nominees’ total. However, under our Corporate Governance Guidelines, in an uncontested election, any nominee for director who receives a greater number of votes “WITHHELD” from his

or her election than votes “FOR” such election (a “Majority Withheld Vote”) is required to tender his or her resignation following certification of the shareholder vote.

If prior to the vote on the election of directors a shareholder has validly given notice of its intent to cumulate votes, you will have six votes per share of Common Stock held which you may allocate among the director nominees. In such an event, the six nominees receiving the highest number of votes “FOR” will be elected to the Board.

If a nominee for director is required to tender his or her resignation pursuant to our Corporate Governance Guidelines, then the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee shall consider the tendered resignation and recommend to the Board of Directors whether to accept it. The Board of Directors will act on the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee’s recommendation within 90 days following certification of the shareholder vote. The Board of Directors will promptly disclose its decision whether to accept or reject the director’s resignation offer (and the reasons for rejecting the resignation offer, if applicable) in a current report on Form 8-K filed by the Company with the SEC.

Any director who tenders his or her resignation pursuant to this provision shall not participate in the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee recommendation, or the Board of Directors’ action, regarding whether to accept the resignation offer.

If all members of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee receive a Majority Withheld Vote at the same election, then the independent directors who did not receive a Majority Withheld Vote shall appoint a committee among themselves to consider the resignation offers and recommend to the Board of Directors whether to accept them; provided, however, that if the only directors who did not receive a Majority Withheld Vote in the same election constitute three or fewer directors, then all directors may participate in the action regarding whether to accept the resignation offers.

Each nominee elected as a director will continue in office until his or her successor has been elected and qualified, or until his or her earlier death, resignation, or retirement.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE ELECTION OF EACH OF THE NOMINEES NAMED ABOVE.

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the executive officers and directors of the Company as of October 22, 2024:


Name	Age		Position Held with the Company
Joseph F. Hanna		61	Chief Executive Officer, President and Director
Keith E. Pratt		61	Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Assistant Corporate Secretary
David M. Whitney		60	Vice President, Principal Accounting Officer and Corporate Controller
Tara Wescott		50	Vice President, Human Resources
Gilda Malek		56	Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary
Kristina Van Trease		55	Senior Vice President, Chief Strategy Officer
Philip B. Hawkins		49	Senior Vice President, Mobile Modular
John P. Skenesky		58	Vice President, TRS-RenTelco
John P. Lieffrig		60	Vice President, Portable Storage
Nicolas C. Anderson(1)(2)		40	Director
Kimberly A. Box(1)(3)		64	Director
Smita Conjeevaram(2)(3)		63	Director
William J. Dawson(1)(2)		70	Director
Bradley M. Shuster(1)(3)		69	Chairman of the Board of Directors

(1)	Member of the Compensation Committee

(2)	Member of the Audit Committee

(3)	Member of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee

Nicolas C. Anderson, Kimberly A. Box, Smita Conjeevaram, William J. Dawson, Joseph F. Hanna, and Bradley M. Shuster are nominees to the Board of Directors and their descriptions appear under “Proposal No. 1: Election of Directors—Nominees.”

Keith E. Pratt was appointed Executive Vice President of the Company in February 2017. He was appointed Senior Vice President in June 2007 and joined the Company in January 2006 as Vice President and was appointed Chief Financial Officer in March 2006. Prior to joining the Company, he was with Advanced Fibre Communications (“AFC”), a public telecommunications equipment company in Petaluma, California, where he served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Pratt served as Chief Financial Officer from 1999 until AFC was acquired by Tellabs, Inc. at the end of 2004. He also served as Director of Corporate Development at AFC from 1997 to 1999 prior to becoming Chief Financial Officer. Prior to Mr. Pratt joining AFC, he served as Director, Strategy & Business Development Group at Pacific Telesis Group, Inc. from 1995 to 1997. Mr. Pratt has an undergraduate degree from Cambridge University in Production Engineering and an M.B.A. from Stanford University.

David M. Whitney joined the Company as its Corporate Controller in 2000 and was appointed Vice President and Principal Accounting Officer in March 2006. Previously, he was Manager of Regional Accounting for The Permanente Medical Group in Oakland, California. Mr. Whitney holds a B.S. in Accounting from California State University at Hayward and is a Certified Public Accountant.

Tara Wescott joined the Company in 2020 as Vice President, Human Resources. Prior to joining the Company, Ms. Wescott held various senior executive leadership roles in Human Resources between 2000-2020 at Macy’s Inc., including leading Human Resources for Macys.com and Macy’s Technology. Ms. Wescott graduated from California State University, East Bay with a B.S. in Business Administration with a concentration in Marketing.

Gilda Malek joined the Company in 2023 as Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary. In her role, Ms. Malek oversees our legal, safety and real estate functions. Prior to joining the Company, Ms. Malek served as Deputy General Counsel at Confluent, a SaaS company, for nearly two years. Prior to Confluent, Ms. Malek worked at AECOM, a global infrastructure firm, in various leadership roles in the company’s Legal Department between 2007 and 2020. Responsibilities included subsidiary General Counsel, division Chief Counsel and Corporate Deputy General Counsel. Ms. Malek received her J.D. from University of San Francisco, School of Law, and her B.A. in Political Science from University of California, Irvine.

Kristina Van Trease was appointed Senior Vice President, Chief Strategy Officer in December of 2023. She previously served as Senior Vice President, Strategy and Business Development, and earlier as Vice President and Division Manager of Adler Tank Rentals, a former division of the Company, from August 2016 through January 2022. Prior to that, Ms. Van Trease was responsible for the startup of our Mobile Modular Portable Storage business and served as Vice President and Division Manager of the business from June 2009 to August 2016. From July 2007 through June 2009, she served as our Director of Corporate Development. She joined the Company in 1992 and has served in corporate management roles as well as sales and management positions for the Company’s TRS-RenTelco division. Ms. Van Trease received a B.S. in Business Administration with a concentration in Marketing from San Jose State University.

Philip B. Hawkins was appointed Senior Vice President and Division Manager, Mobile Modular in January of 2022. In addition to his existing oversight of Enviroplex, Inc. since June 2019, he also oversees Kitchens to Go by Mobile Modular as of April 2021. He previously served as Vice President and Division Manager of Mobile Modular from November 2011 through December 2021 and as Vice President and Division Manager of TRS-RenTelco from June 2007 to November 2011. Mr. Hawkins also held the role of Manager, Corporate Financial Planning and Analysis from June 2004 to June 2007. Prior to that, Mr. Hawkins was a Senior Business Analyst for Technology Rentals and Services (TRS), an electronics equipment rental division of CIT Technologies Corporation, from December 2003 until TRS was acquired by the Company in June 2004. He previously served as Director of Portfolio Management and held other leadership roles with Dell Financial Services from April 1999 to December 2003. Mr. Hawkins received B.S. degrees in Accounting, Finance and Computer Information Systems from Arizona State University.

John P. Skenesky was appointed Vice President and Division Manager of TRS-RenTelco in November 2011. He previously served as the division’s Director of Sales and Product Management from June 2007 to November 2011 and Director of Operations and Product Management from June 2004 to June 2007. Mr. Skenesky joined the Company in 1995 and served in branch management and sales roles for the RenTelco division. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Skenesky served in lab and product management roles at Genstar Rentals from 1991 to 1994. He also served in the United States Navy from 1984 to 1990 as an electronics technician on submarines. Mr. Skenesky received an M.B.A. from Texas Christian University in 2007.

John P. Lieffrig joined the Company and was appointed Vice President and Division Manager of Mobile Modular Portable Storage in August 2016. He previously served as Vice President Sales North America for Modular Space Corporation from 2005 to 2015. Mr. Lieffrig has held several executive leadership roles with equipment rental and business-to-business service organizations, including Aramark Corporation from 2002 to 2005 and GE Capital from 1988 to 2002. He also served on the Modular Building Institute Board of Directors for eight years and was elected President in 2013. Mr. Lieffrig received B.A. degrees in Business Administration and Marketing from Carthage College.

Each executive officer of the Company serves at the pleasure of the Board of Directors.

Characteristics of Director Nominees

The chart below details our Board of Directors’ diversity composition by various characteristics as defined by the NASDAQ Stock Market board diversity and disclosure Rule 5605(f). For more information regarding our philosophy concerning the diversity and recruitment of our directors, see “Qualifications of Directors and Assessment of Diversity” in this Proxy Statement. This table includes information only on our director nominees.

Board Diversity Matrix as of October 22, 2024

Total Number of Directors

Female

Male

Non-Binary

Did Not Disclose

Gender

Part I: Gender Identity

Directors

Part II: Demographic Background

African American or Black

Alaskan Native or Native American

Asian

Hispanic or Latinx

Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander

White

Two or More Races or Ethnicities

LGBTQ

Did Not Disclose Demographic Background

Corporate Governance Overview

Our Board of Directors is committed to strong and effective corporate governance, and, as a result, it regularly monitors our corporate governance policies and practices to ensure compliance with applicable laws, regulations, and rules, as well as best practices.

Our corporate governance program features the following:

•

We have an independent Chairman of the Board of Directors;

•

All of our directors, other than our Chief Executive Officer, are independent;

•

All of our directors are up for re-election annually;

•

Two of our six director nominees are women; additionally, two of our nominees are diverse representatives from under-represented communities (as those communities are defined pursuant to California AB 979);

•

Each director attended at least 75% of the aggregate total number of Board meetings and the total number of meetings of Board committees on which such director served during the time he or she served on the Board or committees in 2023;

•

We have no shareholder rights plan in place;

•

Our Board committees regularly review and update, as necessary, the committee charters, which clearly establish the roles and responsibilities of each such committee, and such charters are posted on our website for review;

•

Our Board generally has an executive session among our non-employee and independent directors after every board meeting;

•

The majority of our Audit Committee members qualify as Audit Committee financial experts;

•

Our Board enjoys unrestricted access to the Company’s management, employees, and professional advisers;

•

We have a code of business conduct and ethics that is reviewed regularly for best practices and is posted on our website for review;

•

We have a clear set of corporate governance guidelines that are reviewed regularly for best practices and posted on our website for review;

•

We are committed to corporate and social responsibility;

•

We have no supermajority voting provisions in our charter documents;

•

We have a compensation recoupment policy;

•

Our insider trading policy prohibits hedging, pledging or engaging in derivative actions relating to our stock by all employees, officers, and directors;

•

Our Board performs an annual self-assessment to evaluate its effectiveness in fulfilling its obligations;

•

We conduct an annual say-on-pay vote;

•

Board and Chief Executive Officer succession planning is a focus and continual Board discussion topic;

•

Our corporate governance documents do not contain a supermajority standard for the approval of a merger or a business combination, which transaction requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding shares;

•

We had no related party transactions as defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission in 2023; and

•

We have a stock ownership and holdback requirement to ensure that our executive officers remain aligned with the interests of the Company and our shareholders.

Director Independence

The Board of Directors has determined that the five (5) non-employee directors on the Board of Directors, consisting of Messrs. Anderson, Dawson, and Shuster and Mses. Box and Conjeevaram, are “independent,” as defined in the listing standards of the NASDAQ Stock Market and regulations of the SEC and that Elizabeth Fetter, who resigned from our Board of Directors effective August 1, 2024, was independent during her service on our Board. Mr. Hanna, as an executive officer of the Company, is not considered independent. In making these determinations, our Board of Directors considered transactions and relationships between each director and his or her immediate family and the Company and our subsidiaries, including those reported in the section below captioned “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.” The purpose of this review was to determine whether any such relationships or transactions were material and, therefore, inconsistent with a determination that such a director is independent. As a result of this review, the Board of Directors affirmatively determined, based on its understanding of such transactions and relationships, that the five (5) non-employee directors are independent of the Company and, therefore, a majority of the members of our Board of Directors are independent under the applicable listing standards of the NASDAQ Stock Market.

Leadership Structure of the Board of Directors

Our Board of Directors is currently comprised of five (5) independent directors and one (1) management director. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines state that the Board of Directors should remain free to decide whether the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer positions should be held by the same person. This allows the Board of Directors to determine the best arrangement for the Company and its shareholders, given changing circumstances of the Company and the composition of the Board of Directors. Currently, the positions are separated. Mr. Hanna, our Chief Executive Officer, is a seasoned leader with over 20 years of management and operational experience in the Company, and he clearly understands and drives our strategic growth and interacts well with the Chairman of the Board and the other directors. Mr. Shuster, our non-executive chairman, has extensive experience as a senior executive of a public company and substantial experience on other public boards

of directors and board committees. Additionally, he is experienced in the fields of mergers and acquisitions; finance, accounting, and investments; business development and operations; strategic and corporate development; stockholder engagement; and is an Audit Committee Financial Expert per the listing standards of the NASDAQ Stock Market, which is coupled with his deep knowledge of our Company. We believe our current leadership structure is optimal at this time.

Board Succession

Our Board of Directors is committed to adding new directors to infuse new ideas and fresh perspectives in the boardroom. As part of our board’s succession planning, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee and our Board of Directors regularly review the composition of the Board of Directors and assess the balance of knowledge, experience, skills, expertise, tenure, and diversity that is appropriate for the Board of Directors and the Company.

Board Tenure

Our Board of Directors recognizes that its current members have served on the Board of Directors for various tenures, with the shortest tenure being approximately two years but with other directors serving for greater than 10 years. Our Board of Directors believes that the Board represents a balance of industry, technical and financial experiences, which provide effective guidance and oversight to management. Our governance policies reflect our belief that directors should not be subject to term limits. While term limits could facilitate fresh ideas and viewpoints being consistently brought to the Board of Directors, we believe they are counterbalanced by the disadvantage of causing the loss of a director who, over a period of time, has developed insight into our strategies, operations, and risks and continues to provide valuable contributions to board deliberations. Nonetheless, our Board of Directors is committed to adding new directors to infuse new ideas and fresh perspectives in the boardroom. In the past several years, four new directors have joined our Board of Directors, with the latest, Mr. Anderson, joining our Board in 2022, and three long-serving directors retired or resigned. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will continue to prioritize diversity of background, as well as diversity from underrepresented communities, in future Board searches.

Shareholder Engagement

Our Board of Directors and management focus on creating long-term, sustainable shareholder value. Key to this goal is shareholder engagement at conferences and in one-on-one meetings to discuss our financial performance, corporate governance practices, executive compensation programs, and other matters. Our conversations with shareholders allow us to better understand our shareholders’ perspectives and provide us with useful feedback to calibrate our priorities.

Meetings and Committees of the Board of Directors

The Board of Directors met five (5) times in 2023. No director attended fewer than 75% of either (i) the total number of meetings of the Board of Directors held in 2023, or (ii) the total number of meetings of the committees of the Board of Directors held in 2023 on which he or she served. All then in office attended the 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders via virtual participation. The standing committees of the Board of Directors currently consist of the Compensation Committee, the Audit Committee, and the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee.

Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee held four (4) meetings in 2023. The Compensation Committee currently consists of Messrs. Anderson, Dawson, and Shuster and Ms. Box. Ms. Box serves as its Chair. Ms. Fetter was a member of the Compensation Committee until her resignation from our Board and all committees on which she

served effective August 1, 2024. The Board of Directors has determined that all current members of the Compensation Committee are “independent,” as defined in the listing standards of the NASDAQ Stock Market and SEC regulations. In addition, the Board of Directors has determined that all current members of the Compensation Committee qualify as “non-employee directors” within the meaning of SEC Rule 16b-3 as promulgated under the Exchange Act, and as “outside directors” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).

The Board of Directors adopted and approved a charter for the Compensation Committee. A copy of this charter is posted on our website at www.mgrc.com under the Investors section. The functions of the Compensation Committee, which are discussed in detail in its charter, are to (a) evaluate executive officer and director compensation policies, goals, plans, and programs; (b) determine the cash and non-cash compensation of the executive officers of the Company; (c) review and oversee the Company’s equity-based and other incentive compensation plans for employees; (d) evaluate the performance of the Company’s executive officers; and (e) direct and review the production of any reports required by the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC.

Compensation decisions for the executive officers of the Company are made by the Compensation Committee after the review by the Board of Directors. The Compensation Committee directs the Chief Executive Officer to develop the incentive compensation guidelines for the other executive officers and to recommend the incentive compensation bonuses for each of the other executive officers, subject to approval by the Compensation Committee. Compensation decisions for directors are made by the Board of Directors based on recommendations from the Compensation Committee.

Audit Committee

The Audit Committee held five (5) meetings in 2023. The Audit Committee currently consists of Messrs. Anderson and Dawson and Ms. Conjeevaram. Mr. Dawson serves as its Chair. Ms. Fetter was a member of the Audit Committee until her resignation from our Board and all committees on which she served effective August 1, 2024. After considering transactions and relationships between each member of the Audit Committee or his or her immediate family and the Company and its subsidiaries and reviewing the qualifications of the members of the Audit Committee, the Board of Directors has determined that all current members of the Audit Committee are “independent,” as defined in the listing standards of the NASDAQ Stock Market and SEC regulations. The Board of Directors has also determined that all current members of the Audit Committee are financially literate and have the requisite financial sophistication, as required by the listing standards of the NASDAQ Stock Market. Furthermore, the Board of Directors has determined that Messrs. Anderson and Dawson and Ms. Conjeevaram, as well as Ms. Fetter (during her tenure on the Audit Committee), each qualify as Audit Committee financial experts, as defined by the applicable SEC rules, pursuant to the fact that, among other things, Mr. Dawson was the Chief Financial Officer at several public and private companies, including the Chief Financial Officer of Adamas Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Mr. Anderson is currently Managing Partner of Elm Grove Partners, a private equity firm, and is also Chief Executive Officer of ArcherHall; Ms. Conjeevaram is a CPA and has served in the capacity of Chief Financial Officer for four privately held financial and investment firms and is also an experienced independent director and audit committee member; and Ms. Fetter has served as the CEO of three public companies, served as a divisional CFO, taught finance and accounting at the graduate level, and served as a financial expert on other boards; and in those respective capacities each has acquired the relevant experience and expertise and has the attributes set forth in the applicable rules as being required for an Audit Committee financial expert.

The Board of Directors adopted and approved a charter for the Audit Committee. A copy of this charter is posted on our website at www.mgrc.com under the Investors section. The functions of the Audit Committee, which are discussed in detail in its charter, are to (a) oversee the engagement, replacement, compensation, qualification, independence, and performance of the Company’s independent auditors; (b) oversee the conduct of the Company’s accounting and financial reporting processes and the integrity of the Company’s audited financial statements and other financial reports; (c) oversee the performance of the Company’s internal accounting,

financial, and disclosure controls function; and (d) oversee the Company’s compliance with its policies and other legal requirements as such compliance relates to the integrity of the Company’s financial reporting. The Audit Committee has also established procedures for (a) the receipt, retention, and treatment of complaints received by us regarding accounting, internal accounting controls, or auditing matters, and (b) the confidential, anonymous submission by our employees of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters. The Audit Committee also oversees the preparation of a report for inclusion in our annual proxy statements and is charged with the other duties and responsibilities listed in its charter. For details, see “Report of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors” in this Proxy Statement. The Audit Committee is a separately designated standing audit committee as defined in Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Exchange Act.

Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee

The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee held two (2) meetings in 2023. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee consists of Mr. Shuster and Mses. Box and Conjeevaram. Ms. Conjeevaram serves as its Chair. Our Board of Directors has determined that all current members of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee are “independent,” as defined in the listing standards of the NASDAQ Stock Market and SEC regulations.

The Board of Directors adopted and approved a charter for the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. A copy of this charter is posted on our website at www.mgrc.com under the Investors section. The functions of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, which are discussed in detail in its charter, are to assist the Board of Directors in all matters relating to (a) the establishment, implementation, and monitoring of policies and processes regarding the recruitment and nomination of candidates to the Board of Directors and committees of the Board of Directors; (b) the review and making of recommendations to the Board of Directors regarding the composition and structure of the Board of Directors and committees of the Board of Directors; (c) the development, evaluation, and monitoring of the Company’s corporate governance processes and principles; (d) the development and implementation of, and monitoring of compliance with, the Company’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and making recommendations to the Board of Directors of revisions to the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics from time to time, as appropriate; and (e) the administration of the Board of Directors’ annual self-evaluation process and the sharing of the results thereof with the Board of Directors for discussion and deliberation.

Environmental, Social and Governance Matters

We believe that sound corporate citizenship and attention to environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”) principles are essential to our success. Wherever possible, the products, services, and practices of the Company are designed to promote the ESG principles. We are committed to operating with integrity, contributing to the local communities surrounding our offices and facilities, promoting diversity, developing our employees, focusing on sustainability, and being thoughtful environmental stewards.

Our Board provides oversight of management’s efforts around these ESG topics, including risk oversight of ESG-related matters, and is committed to supporting the Company’s efforts to operate as a sound corporate citizen. Company management provides updates to the Board on the Company’s work in ESG during each quarterly Board meeting and the Board discusses the same. Additionally, the Charter for our Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee also provides that this committee is specially designated to oversee ESG matters.

We believe that an integrated approach to business strategy, corporate governance, and corporate citizenship creates long-term value. Among the ways in which we have demonstrated our commitment to ESG matters are the following:

•

Commitment to minimizing adverse impacts on the environment through energy management programs, including high-efficiency HVAC and energy systems, responsible use of limited available land, and use of natural light.

•

When possible, the Company uses recycled building materials and construction components that can be further recycled on its modular building products.

•

Creation of a strong corporate culture that promotes the highest standards of ethics and compliance for our business, including a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that sets forth principles to guide employee, designated executive, and non-employee director conduct.

•

Company and employee commitment to the local communities where our facilities are located, including supporting various non-profits, charities, and other community programs, and, from time to time, providing support through the McGrath Cares fund.

•

Equal employment opportunity hiring practices, policies, and management of employees.

•

Anti-harassment policy that prohibits hostility or aversion towards individuals in protected categories, prohibits sexual harassment in any form, details how to report and respond to harassment issues, and strictly prohibits retaliation against any employee for reporting harassment.

•

Commitment to fostering and promoting a diverse workforce and a collaborative work environment.

The Role of the Board of Directors in the Oversight of Risk

While Company management is primarily responsible for managing risk, the Board of Directors and each of its committees play a role in overseeing the Company’s risk management practices. The full Board of Directors is ultimately responsible for risk oversight, and it discharges this responsibility by, among other things, receiving regular reports from Company management concerning the Company’s business and the material risks facing the Company. Each of the Board’s committees also plays a role in risk oversight as follows:

Audit Committee. Under its charter, the Audit Committee plays a key role in the Board of Directors’ risk oversight process. The Audit Committee’s duties include discussing the Company’s guidelines and policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management with Company management and the Company’s independent auditors. The Audit Committee also receives regular reports from Company management and discusses with management the steps taken to monitor and control risk exposures. In addition, the Audit Committee reviews all of the Company’s quarterly financial reports, including any disclosure therein of risk factors affecting the Company and its businesses. The Audit Committee regularly receives reports from, among others, the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer, and its Compliance Officer. The Audit Committee provides regular reports to the full Board of Directors on its risk oversight activities and any issues identified.

Compensation Committee. Under its charter, the Compensation Committee reviews with its independent compensation consultant and management, as appropriate, the Company’s compensation and succession plans, policies, and practices. The Compensation Committee also sets performance goals under the Company’s annual bonus and long-term incentive plans. In setting the performance targets and overseeing the Company’s compensation plans, policies, and practices, the Compensation Committee considers whether such plans, policies, and practices are consistent with the long-term interests of the Company’s shareholders. The Compensation Committee also considers risks that may be created and whether any such risks are reasonably likely to have a material adverse impact on the Company. The Compensation Committee considers the overall mix of compensation for all employees as well as the various risk control and mitigation features of its compensation plans, including appropriate performance measures and targets and incentive plan payout maximums. The Compensation Committee provides regular reports to the full Board of Directors on the Company’s compensation plans, policies, and practices and the Compensation Committee’s oversight of compensation-related risks.

Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. Under its charter, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee is responsible for, among other things, developing and recommending to the Board of

Directors a set of effective corporate governance guidelines and procedures designed to assure compliance with applicable governance standards. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee is also responsible for providing oversight of the Company’s ESG strategy, policies, and practices. As part of that responsibility, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee receives annual presentations from the Company’s management on the Company’s work in this area and discusses the Company’s ESG work and strategies with the Company’s management. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee provides regular reports to the Board of Directors.

The Board of Directors oversees the management of risks from cybersecurity threats, including the policies, standards, processes and practices that the Company’s management implements to address risks from cybersecurity threats. The Board of Directors receives reports on the Company’s technology and cybersecurity functions, including vulnerability assessments, any third-party and independent reviews, the threat environment, and other information security considerations.

Through the activities of the Audit, Compensation, and Corporate Governance and Nominating Committees, as well as the full Board of Directors’ interactions with management concerning the Company’s business and the material risks that may impact the Company, the independent directors on the Board of Directors are able to monitor the Company’s risk management process and offer critical insights to Company management.

Qualifications of Directors and Assessment of Diversity

The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will consider for nomination all bona fide candidates proposed by management or shareholders and will nominate directors that it believes will serve the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. Candidates must have the education and business or organizational experience and skills that will enable them to excel in carrying out their responsibilities on the Board of Directors. Candidates must possess and have demonstrated in professional endeavors the highest personal and professional ethics, integrity, and values, and be committed to representing the long-term best interests of shareholders. Further, candidates must have an inquisitive and objective perspective, practical wisdom, and mature judgment, and be willing and able to challenge management in a constructive manner. Candidates will also be judged on their ability to work in a collegial manner with a sense of common purpose, energy, industry knowledge, business sense, and trust with other members of the Board of Directors and management, as one group acting in unison to solve difficult problems as they may arise. The candidate’s specific knowledge of the Company, its markets, and its strategy will also be considered.

When evaluating candidates, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee considers the diversity of the backgrounds, experience, and skills of the current directors on the Board of Directors, including their gender, age, ethnic, and cultural backgrounds, the long-term needs of the Company based on its strategic direction, and responsible succession planning for all Board positions. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee selects candidates who will provide the most value to the Board of Directors, management, and shareholders. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee assesses the effectiveness of its policy regarding diversity as part of the annual self-evaluation process.

The Board of Directors’ recommendations for inclusion in the slate of directors at an annual or special meeting of shareholders, or for appointment by the Board of Directors to fill a vacancy, are based on its determination, after reviewing recommendations from the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, as to the suitability of each recommended individual.

Director Nomination Process

Continuing Directors

The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will apply its director candidate selection criteria described above, including a director’s past contributions to the Board of Directors, prior to recommending a

director for re-election to another term. Directors may not be re-nominated annually as a matter of course. Once the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee evaluations are completed and the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee has considered all other potential director candidates, it recommends the best slate of candidates for approval by the full Board of Directors.

New Directors

Generally, once a need to add a new member to the Board of Directors is identified, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will initiate a search by working with staff support, seeking input from members of the Board of Directors and senior management, and hiring a consultant or search firm, if necessary.

After a slate of possible candidates is identified, certain members of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, other members of the Board of Directors, and senior management have the opportunity to interview the prospective candidate(s). The remaining members of the Board of Directors who do not interview the prospective candidate(s) are kept informed. After completing its selection process, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee ultimately determines and recommends the best candidate(s) for approval by the full Board of Directors.

A description of the procedure to be followed by security holders in submitting director recommendations is set forth in the “Shareholder Recommendations for Membership on our Board of Directors” in this Proxy Statement. The director candidate selection criteria will be equally applied to both continuing directors and shareholder-submitted director candidates.

Director Compensation

Our Compensation Committee periodically seeks input from independent compensation consultants on a range of external market factors, including evolving compensation trends, appropriate peer companies, and market survey data. The Compensation Committee reviews non-employee director compensation every two years. In August 2023, our Compensation Committee retained Semler Brossy Consulting Group (“Semler Brossy”) to conduct a review and analysis of the non-employee director compensation program to be considered by the Compensation Committee in establishing the 2024 compensation review cycle remuneration levels for our non-employee directors.

The 2023 compensation described below was approved by the Board of Directors based on the previous compensation consultant, Pearl Meyer & Partners, LLC’s (“Pearl Meyer”) analysis and recommendations of the Compensation Committee. For a more complete description of the methodologies used by our compensation consultants and the Compensation Committee, please refer to “Compensation Consultant and Peer Group Selection” in this Proxy Statement.

For 2023, each non-employee director of the Company was compensated for his or her services as a director with an annual retainer of $85,000. In addition to the annual retainers, the Chairs of the Board of Directors, Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, and Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee received additional annual retainers of $75,000, $25,000, $18,500, and $10,000, respectively. Each other member of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, and Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee received annual retainers of $10,000, $7,500, and $5,500, respectively. Members of the Board of Directors do not receive additional compensation for attending Board or committee meetings. All non-employee directors are reimbursed for expenses incurred in connection with attending Board of Directors or committee meetings. Mr. Hanna received no additional compensation for his service as a director. These annual retainers are included in the “2023 Non-Employee Director Compensation Table” below.

For fiscal year 2024, based on Semler Brossy’s November 2023 analysis, the Compensation Committee recommended, and the Board of Directors approved, no increase to the non-employee director annual retainer.

For fiscal year 2024, each non-employee director of the Company will receive an annual retainer of $85,000. In addition, to the annual retainer the Chairs of the Board of Directors, Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, and Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will receive additional annual retainers of $75,000, $25,000, $18,500, and $10,000, respectively. Each other member of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, and Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will receive annual retainers of $10,000, $7,500, and $5,500, respectively. Any non-employee director not serving on the Board of Directors for the full calendar year will receive prorated compensation based on that portion of the year in which he or she served. Mr. Hanna will not receive any additional compensation for his services as a director.

In addition to cash compensation, each of the non-employee directors of the Company has historically received an annual Restricted Stock Unit (“RSU”) equity grant denominated as a fair value and then converted to shares rounded to the nearest 100 at the date of grant. Based on Pearl Meyer’s analysis conducted in 2022, the Compensation Committee recommended, and the Board of Directors approved, the fair value of the 2023 equity grant of approximately $120,000. On February 24, 2023, the Board of Directors granted each non-employee director RSUs under the 2016 Plan 1,200 shares of the Company’s Common Stock with a vesting date of April 1, 2024. Each of these grants represented an equivalent total equity compensation of $125,112, based on the NASDAQ Stock Market close price of $104.26 on February 24, 2023. The total equity compensation values can fluctuate slightly each year due to rounding. These 2023 RSU grants are included in the “2023 Non-Employee Director Compensation Table” in this Proxy Statement.

Based on Semler Brossy’s analysis, the Compensation Committee recommended, and the Board of Directors approved, no change to the fair value of the 2024 equity grant of approximately $120,000. On February 23, 2024, the Board of Directors granted each non-employee director RSUs under the 2016 Plan 1,000 shares of the Company’s common stock with a vesting date of April 1, 2025. Each of these grants represented an equivalent total equity compensation of $124,900, based on the NASDAQ Stock Market closing price of $124.90 on February 23, 2024. The total equity compensation values can fluctuate slightly each year due to rounding.

The table below summarizes the compensation paid by the Company to its non-employee directors for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023.

2023 NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION TABLE


Name	Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($)		Stock Awards(3) ($)		Total ($)
Nicolas C. Anderson	$	102,500	$	125,112	$	227,612
Kimberly A. Box	$	106,475	$	125,112	$	231,587
Smita Conjeevaram	$	103,047	$	125,112	$	228,159
William J. Dawson	$	117,500	$	125,112	$	242,612
Elizabeth A. Fetter(1)	$	107,275	$	125,112	$	232,387
Bradley M. Shuster	$	173,000	$	125,112	$	298,112
M. Richard Smith(2)	$	44,492	$	29,553	$	74,045
Dennis P. Stradford(2)	$	42,538	$	29,553	$	72,091

(1)

Ms. Fetter resigned from the Board of Directors effective August 1, 2024. The Compensation Committee approved the following in consideration of Ms. Fetter’s long service on the Board of Directors: (1) the accelerated vesting of 1,000 shares of restricted stock units, previously granted to Ms. Fetter on February 23, 2024, which would have otherwise vested on April 1, 2025, and (2) a cash payment to Ms. Fetter in the amount of approximately $51,000 in respect of Board and committee retainers for the remainder of calendar year 2024.

(2)

Messrs. Smith and Stradford retired from the Board of Directors effective June 7, 2023, and received compensation for their service from January 1 – June 7, 2023. Additionally, Messrs. Smith and Stradford were granted RSUs under the 2016 Plan of 1,200 shares of the Company’s common stock that represented an equivalent total equity compensation of $121,875 based on the NASDAQ Stock Market closing price of $104.26 on February 24, 2023. Upon their retirement, 300 shares of those RSUs became fully vested, and 900 shares were forfeited. Therefore, Messrs. Smith and Stradford’s total equity compensation was $29,553 based on the NASDAQ Stock Market closing price of $98.51 on June 7, 2023.

(3)	Pursuant to the Director Award Agreements, awards vest in full immediately prior to the specified effective date of a Change In Control or a Corporate Transaction.

Director Stock Ownership

The Board of Directors believes that, in order to align the interests of directors and shareholders, directors should have a significant financial (equity) stake in the Company. Each director has a target ownership level of 5,000 shares of Common Stock to be achieved by each director within five years of joining the Board of Directors or as soon thereafter as practicable. In evaluating whether the Common Stock value ownership guideline has been met, all Common Stock owned is considered. As of October 22, 2024, the ownership level of each of our non-employee directors met or exceeded the target, or are within the ownership guidelines’ five-year compliance period.

Director Annual Evaluation

It is important to the Company that the Board and its committees are performing effectively and in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. The Board performs an annual self-assessment, led by the Chair of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, to evaluate its effectiveness in fulfilling its obligations. As part of this annual self-assessment, directors are able to provide feedback on the performance of other directors. The Chair of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee then follows up on this feedback and takes such further action as he or she deems appropriate.

No Political Contributions

It is the Company’s policy that no Company funds or assets will be used to make a contribution to any political party, political campaign, political candidate, or public official in the United States or any foreign country, unless the contribution is lawfully and expressly authorized by the Board of Directors or our Chief Executive Officer. The Company made no political contributions in 2023 and intends to make no political contributions in the future.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND OTHER INFORMATION

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

In this Proxy Statement, we refer to Messrs. Hanna, Pratt, and Hawkins, and Mses. Malek and Van Trease collectively as our named executive officers or NEOs. Mr. Hanna is our Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Pratt is our Chief Financial Officer and Mr. Hawkins, and Mses. Malek and Van Trease were our next three highest compensated executive officers serving as of December 31, 2023. In this Proxy Statement, we refer to the NEOs and Messrs. Whitney, Skenesky, Lieffrig, and Ms. Wescott collectively as “executive officers.” Melodie Craft resigned from the Company effective March 10, 2023, and Ms. Malek was appointed as our Vice President, General Counsel, and Corporate Secretary, effective March 21, 2023.

2023 Business Performance Highlights and Alignment with Compensation

Our full-year 2023 revenue and profit growth reflect a strategic focusing of the McGrath portfolio on Mobile Modular through the Vesta Modular acquisition and Adler Tank Rentals divestiture, which we announced on February 1, 2023. We also maintained a diligent focus on execution as we made the most of healthy market conditions across our Mobile Modular and Portable Storage business segments. We pursued our strategic growth focus on the modular segment with significant organic investment in new fleet, while optimizing pricing and improving fleet utilization. We also made progress with our modular growth initiatives for additional services and new equipment sales.

The annual incentive bonus amounts in respect of 2023 for the executive officers were based on the Company’s Adjusted EBITDA for corporate officers and division-specific Adjusted EBITDA for division officers (defined as the Company’s net income before interest expense, provision for income taxes, depreciation, amortization, non-cash impairment costs, share-based compensation and transaction costs). Adjusted EBITDA accounted for 100% of the annual profitability bonus target in compensation plans for amounts paid out in 2023. The metric used to determine the achievement of long-term performance-based restricted stock units (“RSUs”) granted during 2023 is the achievement of three-year Return on Invested Capital (“ROIC”) and revenue growth targets. In addition, in an effort to retain key managers, attract new talent, and build an ownership mentality for executive officers, the Compensation Committee continued its practice in 2023 of granting a mix of time-based and performance-based RSUs. The time-based RSUs vest over three years, and performance-based RSUs vest at the end of a three-year performance period. This approach more closely aligns our equity compensation with our peer companies and common market practices.

Proposed Acquisition by WillScot Mobile Mini and Its Termination

As previously disclosed, on January 28, 2024, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) by and among the Company, WillScot Holdings Corporation (“WillScot”), Brunello Merger Sub I, Inc., a California corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of WillScot and Brunello Merger Sub II, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and wholly owned subsidiary of WillScot, pursuant to which WillScot agreed to acquire the Company pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement. On September 17, 2024, the Company and WillScot entered into a mutual termination agreement (the “Termination Agreement”) pursuant to which they mutually agreed to terminate the Merger Agreement effective upon receipt by the Company of a cash payment in the amount of $180,000,000 (the “Termination Fee”), which Termination Fee was received on September 20, 2024.

In consideration of the pending merger with WillScot, the Compensation Committee, in consultation with the Board of Directors, approved certain equity awards to executive officers in 2024 that deviated from historical practices. The Compensation Committee intends to generally revert to its historical approach on equity grants to executive officers subsequent to termination of the Merger Agreement and the Company continuing to operate as a standalone company.

Executive Compensation Program Design

The Compensation Committee has the responsibility for establishing, implementing, and continually monitoring the compensation of the Company’s executive officers. The Compensation Committee oversees and approves the design of the executive compensation program to ensure that the total compensation paid to our executive officers is fair, reasonable, competitive, and aligned with the goals and objectives of the Company. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023, the principal components of compensation for executive officers were:

Annual base salary;

Non-equity annual performance-based incentive compensation (“Annual Cash Bonus”) pursuant to the Non-Equity Performance-Based Incentive Plan (the “Cash Bonus Plan”); and

Long-term equity incentive compensation.

The Compensation Committee determined that these three elements, with a significant percentage of total compensation allocated to “at-risk” performance-based incentives, best align the interests of our executive officers with our shareholders and achieve our overall goals for executive compensation. The Annual Cash Bonus rewards achievement of annual incentive goals and the long-term equity incentive compensation rewards achievement of long-term growth in shareholder value and sustained financial health of the Company. There is no pre-established policy or target for the allocation between either cash and non-cash or short-term and long-term incentive compensation. Rather, the Compensation Committee reviews relevant market compensation data from its compensation consultant and other sources and uses its judgment to determine the appropriate level and mix of incentive compensation on an annual basis.

Elements of 2023 Executive Compensation Program


Compensation Element	Description	Program Features
Annual Base Salary	• Fixed component of annual cash compensation. • Influenced by competitive market pay trends and individual performance while considering each NEOs experience and scope of responsibilities.	• Offers McGrath NEOs a stable measure of certainty and predictability to meet ongoing living and financial commitments. • Ensures McGrath remains competitive with the market to ensure the Company attracts and retains top talent.
Annual Incentive Compensation (“Annual Cash Bonus”)	• Variable compensation paid to NEOs subject to pre-established financial “Profitability Bonus” targets as well as individual “Personal Annual Priorities” performance. • Each NEO is granted a target award (as a percentage of the NEO’s base salary) based upon job responsibilities, performance in role, and market competitiveness. • In 2023, the Profitability Bonus Plan metric was changed to a consistent metric of company Adjusted EBITDA for corporate officers and divisional Adjusted EBITDA for division VPs. In the prior year, pre-tax income was used for corporate officers and division EBIT was used for division VPs.	• In 2023, Adjusted EBITDA was the only metric in the “Profitability Bonus” portion of the program, weighted 75% of the total Annual Cash Bonus. Based on Adjusted EBITDA performance, payouts can range from 50% at threshold to 200% at maximum, with linear interpolation between performance levels. • The remaining 25% of the Annual Cash Bonus was dedicated to “Personal Annual Priorities” comprised of a maximum of four (4) items deemed to be the most critical priorities for each NEO for the year. Individual priorities payout opportunity is capped at 100% of target.

Compensation Element

Description

Program Features

Long-Term Equity

Incentives

• The Compensation Committee granted a mix of performance-based restricted stock units (“PSUs) and time-based RSUs in 2023 to retain key talent and build an ownership mentality for executive officers.

• A target equity award is granted to each NEO commensurate with job responsibilities, market competitiveness, experience, and qualitative and quantitative performance factors.

• PSUs utilize a multi-year performance period to link realized compensation to achievement of long-term financial performance.

• In 2023, company wide ROIC and revenue achievement goals were used to measure performance achievement. RSUs align the executives with stockholder interests on increasing share value.

• In 2023, 50% was granted in the form of PSUs with performance measured by achievement of three-year Company ROIC and revenue growth targets, each weighted equally, providing a balanced focus on both returns and growth over the three-year performance period. The PSUs cliff vest three years after grant, subject to continued service and achievement of the performance goals.

• The remaining 50% was granted as time-based RSUs vesting in three equal annual installments over three years based on continued service.

• We believe this provides a balanced focus on both returns and growth over the three-year performance period.

Executive Compensation Practices at a Glance

We strive to have compensation programs that serve to attract and retain our best people, align the interests of our employees with that of our shareholders by focusing incentive compensation on pay for performance, and at the same time assure good corporate governance. Over the years, always with a focus on enhancing long-term shareholder value, we have implemented many changes, including granting RSUs with longer-term targets, stock ownership guidelines, a compensation recoupment policy, a risk-hedging policy, change in control arrangements, limited perquisites, net settlement features in equity grants to reduce the effect of dilution, and setting realistic stretch targets specifically focused on our rental industry metrics.


What We Do				What We Do Not Do

Pay for Performance under Our Cash Bonus Plan: We link pay to performance and shareholder interests by establishing an annual cash bonus plan based on financial metrics and personal annual priorities established in advance by the CEO and/or the Compensation Committee. Performance-Based Long Term Incentive Compensation: 50% of the RSUs granted to our executive officers have performance-based vesting subject to goals associated with corporate or divisional ROIC performance. In 2023, we also began using revenue as an additional measurement. Compensation Recoupment Policy: The policy may require an executive officer in the event of a financial restatement to reimburse the Company with respect to any incentive compensation (including cash and equity awards) received during the past three years. Capped Incentives under Our Annual Cash Bonus Plan: Bonuses under our annual cash bonus plan are capped for our executive officers — the cap is tied to their base salary for the relevant year, and in no case is it greater than 200% of their target bonus. Equity Awards Vesting: Performance-based awards vest at the end of each three-year performance period. Time-based awards are subject to a three-year vesting schedule. Stock Ownership and Holdback Guidelines: Our executive officers and directors are subject to stock ownership and holdback guidelines. Compensation Committee Independence and Experience: The Compensation Committee is comprised solely of independent directors who have extensive experience. Thorough Compensation Risk Assessment: The Compensation Committee regularly conducts a comprehensive risk assessment of the Company’s executive compensation programs and practices every two years to ensure prudent risk management. Independent Compensation Advisor: The Compensation Committee utilizes its own independent advisor. Annual Stockholder Advisory Vote: We conduct an annual shareholder advisory vote on the compensation of our NEOs.				No “Single Trigger” Change of Control Severance Payments: We generally do not have “single trigger” severance payments owing solely on account of the occurrence of a change of control event. No Guaranteed Bonuses: We do not provide guaranteed minimum bonuses or uncapped incentives under our annual cash bonus plan. No Re-Pricing of Equity Awards: Our equity plans prohibit repricing of equity awards without shareholder approval. No Special Perquisites or Retirement Benefits: We do not provide special perquisites or retirement benefits to our executive officers that are not generally made available to all of our employees except that any executive officer employed with the Company for at least 10 years may remain on the Company’s health insurance policy after retiring if he or she pays 100% of the premiums. No Tax Gross-Ups: We do not provide tax gross-ups. No Hedging in Company Securities: Our employees and directors are prohibited from engaging in any hedging transaction with respect to company equity securities. No Pledging of Company Securities: Our employees and directors are prohibited from engaging in any pledging transaction with respect to company equity securities.

The following sections describe all features of our executive compensation in more detail.

Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

The purpose of the Company’s executive compensation program is to attract and retain exceptional managerial talent and to reward performance by establishing measurable objectives to drive future performance, thus aligning our executive officers’ interests with those of our shareholders. We believe the most effective compensation program is one that is designed to reward the achievement of specific annual, long-term, and strategic goals of the Company. Our primary objective is to align our executive officers’ interests with the interests of our shareholders by rewarding the achievement of established goals that contribute to increased long-term shareholder value. To that end, part of our executive officers’ compensation is directly tied to identifiable, objective goals by which performance can be measured. In addition, in structuring our executive compensation program, we consider the compensation of our executive officers relative to the compensation paid to similarly situated executives of our peer group companies and the broader general market.

Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation

At the 2023 Annual Meeting, 96.7% of the shares of Common Stock present and entitled to vote on the advisory vote on the executive compensation proposal were in favor of our named executive officer compensation. The result of the 2023 vote was consistent with our record over the past five years of greater than 95% support for say-on-pay. The Board of Directors and Compensation Committee reviewed these final vote results and determined that, given the significant level of support, our executive compensation policies and decisions discussed in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” were appropriate to achieve our objectives.

Compensation Consultant and Peer Group Selection

The Compensation Committee periodically seeks input from its outside compensation consultant on a range of external market factors, including evolving compensation trends, appropriate peer companies, and market survey data. In 2023, the Compensation Committee retained Semler Brossy to conduct a review and analysis of our current compensation program to be considered by the Compensation Committee in establishing the compensation levels and severance guidelines for our non-employee directors and executive officers. After consideration of several factors relating to the independence of Semler Brossy, including those guidelines set forth in the NASDAQ listing standards, the Compensation Committee determined that Semler Brossy is independent.

In late 2023, Semler Brossy provided an analysis with relevant market data and alternatives to consider when making compensation decisions for our executive officers. The analysis compared each element of total compensation against a peer group of publicly traded companies and compensation survey data (the “Compensation Peer Group”). The Compensation Peer Group consisted of companies against which we compete for recruiting and retaining qualified line and staff executives and independent non-employee directors. In selecting the Compensation Peer Group, the Compensation Committee also sought to comply with best-practice parameters by including companies in a similar industry or geography and with similar financial metrics, such as revenue, market capitalization, and net income. The Compensation Committee generally reviews total compensation and considers it compared to the Compensation Peer Group.

Other factors were also taken into consideration when determining executive officer compensation levels, including:

Divisional size (revenues or earnings) contribution to Company-wide results relative to other divisions.

Divisional business complexity relative to other divisions of the Company.

Stature/experience/length of service of executive officer in role relative to market comparisons.

Geographic location of executive officer and relative market comparisons.

Definition and extent of responsibilities of executive officer role by the Company versus peer group sources.

Divisional leadership transition or new business initiatives.

Appropriate weighting or relativeness of different peer group sources.

Other factors the Compensation Committee may deem appropriate.

The companies comprising the 2023 Compensation Peer Group are as follows:


Air Transport Services Group, Inc.	Civeo Corporation	Cohu, Inc.

Form Factor, Inc.	GATX Corporation	H&E Equipment Service, Inc.

Harmonic, Inc.	Herc Holding Inc.	Montrose Environmental Group, Inc.

Triton International LTD	US Ecology, Inc.	Willis Lease Finance Corp.

WillScot Mobile Mini Holdings Corporation

In connection with Semler Brossy’s updated peer analysis in 2023, the Compensation Committee approved a revised Compensation Peer Group for 2024 compensation decisions. The peer group serves as a basis for which the Compensation Committee considers an analysis of market competitive pay for all of the Company’s executive officers in comparison to peers when determining pay levels for target compensation. The peer group also serves as an informative source determining competitive practices relative to pay design and governance practices.

The Company’s peer group is reviewed and selected based on companies within a similar industry, geography, and financial profile. In 2023, the Company’s peers were screened to approximate one-third to three times the Company’s revenue and market cap as of the time of review. Additional consideration is given to qualitative criteria, where companies who matched the screening criteria were holistically reviewed to determine whether they were seen as a reasonable comparator for the Company (on the basis of whether they are seen as talent competitors, have similar business characteristics, and operate adjacent to the Company’s industry).

As a result, the Compensation Committee approved an increase of the size of the Company’s peer group from 12 to 18 companies. Civeo and Willis Lease Finance Corporation were removed due to falling below the market cap screen. Air Lease Corp, Badger Meter, Custom Truck One Source, Enerpac Tool Group, Kratos Defense and Security, Stem, Transact, and UniFirst Corp, were all added to peer group for 2024 compensation decisions.

The revised Compensation Peer Group for 2024 is as follows:


Air Lease Corporation	Air Transport Services Group, Inc.	Badger Meter, Inc.

Cohu, Inc.	Custom Truck One Source, Inc.	Enerpac Tool Group Corporation

Form Factor, Inc.	GATX Corporation	H&E Equipment Service, Inc.

Harmonic, Inc.	Herc Holding Inc.	Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.

Montrose Environmental Group, Inc.	Stem, Inc.	Transcat, Inc.

Triton International LTD	UniFirst Corporation	WillScot Mobile Mini Holdings Corporation

Process of Setting and Approving Executive Compensation; Role of Chief Executive Officer

The Compensation Committee approves annual compensation levels and equity awards to all of our executive officers. The process is described below:

The five steps below describe the process of setting and approving executive compensation and the role of the Chief Executive Officer in a typical year.

1. The Compensation Committee reviews the independent compensation consultant’s analysis to evaluate for each executive officer (1) a target total compensation amount; (2) the appropriate allocation of base salary, annual bonus, and long-term equity incentive compensation; (3) the risk that any compensation element could have an adverse impact on the Company; and (4) if there should be any change to the forms of compensation to better align our executive officer’s interests with those of our shareholders.

2. For the Chief Executive Officer, the allocation of base salary, annual bonus, and long-term equity incentive compensation and the applicable performance target levels are determined by the Compensation Committee, in consultation with the Chairman of the Board of Directors and separately with all of the independent directors. The Chief Executive Officer has no role in setting his compensation.

3. For each of the other executive officers, the Chief Executive Officer recommends the allocation of base salaries, annual bonuses, and long-term equity incentive compensation and the applicable performance target levels. These recommendations are presented to the Compensation Committee for the Compensation Committee’s consideration and, if appropriate, approval.

4. Shortly after the end of the fiscal year, the Chief Executive Officer reviews the performance of each executive officer (other than himself) against his or her established personal objectives for the year and general management responsibilities and then determines the achievement level attained.

5. At the end of the fiscal year, the Compensation Committee reviews the Chief Executive Officer’s performance. The Compensation Committee then determines, based on the market data and the Chief Executive Officer’s performance, and after consultation with the Chairman of the Board of Directors and separately with all independent directors, the compensation of the Chief Executive Officer.

2023 and 2024 Annual Base Salary

The table below sets forth the annual base salary of each of our named executive officers in 2022, 2023, and 2024. Based on the performance results of 2022, the outlook for the Company in 2023 and 2024, the updated analysis conducted by the Compensation Committee’s compensation consultant, and Mr. Hanna’s input for the named executive officers other than himself, the Compensation Committee considered and approved the increased base salaries, due to merit and alignment with relevant market trends, for the named executive officers in 2023 and 2024, as shown in the table below.


Name	2022 Base Salary		2023 Base Salary		2024 Base Salary(3)
Joseph F. Hanna(1)	$	700,000	$	800,000	$	850,000
Keith E. Pratt	$	480,000	$	500,000	$	520,000
Philip B. Hawkins	$	350,000	$	380,000	$	450,000
Gilda Malek(2)	$	—	$	400,000	$	440,000
Kristina Van Trease	$	316,000	$	330,000	$	350,000

(1)	Mr. Hanna’s salary was adjusted in 2023 to ensure alignment with pay levels at the Company’s compensation peer group.

(2)	Ms. Malek was hired on March 21, 2023, and therefore does not have a base salary to report for 2022. For 2023, Ms. Malek’s salary was prorated based on her annual base salary of $400,000.

(3)	In 2024, market adjustments to NEO base salaries were made at the recommendation of the Company’s compensation consultant, Semler Brossy.

2023 Non-Equity Performance-Based Incentive Plan Compensation

The 2023 Cash Bonus Plan is comprised of two components. The first component compensates the executive officer for his or her efforts leading to the Company’s success at meeting its annual profitability goals. Annual profitability goals are measured by Adjusted EBITDA for corporate executive officers (Messrs. Hanna and Pratt and Mses. Malek and Van Trease) and for division executive officers (Mr. Hawkins). The second component measures the executive officer’s success at accomplishing his or her personal annual priorities. These two components are used to ensure an emphasis on annual profitability and to define each executive officer’s specific role with measurable goals to achieve annual and long-term increases in shareholder value. For each of our NEOs, the profitability component is weighted 75% and the personal annual priorities component is weighted 25%.

Component 1—Profitability:

The profitability goal for the corporate NEOs, Messrs. Hanna and Pratt and Mses. Malek and Van Trease, is based 100% on the Company’s Adjusted EBITDA. For the division NEO, Mr. Hawkins, his profitability goal is also based 100% on Adjusted EBITDA for his division.

Adjusted EBITDA is calculated from results reported on the Company’s income statement, excluding one-time acquisition-related transaction costs disclosed by the Company in its annual and quarterly reports. For a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to the comparable GAAP measure, please reference the Original Annual Report.

We use a collaborative process between our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and other executive officers to determine the annual profitability goal for each of the executive officers of the Company. The goals are then recommended to the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee then reviews each executive officer’s compensation history and performance before determining final levels for profitability goals.

The annual profitability goals for each division and the Company are established at the beginning of each fiscal year based upon a “realistic stretch” philosophy. The Company’s management determines the potential annual financial performance for each division and the Company based on its outlook for the opportunity levels in the markets in which it operates, strategic and tactical initiatives, and other key factors and special circumstances, applying a “realistic stretch” view to what potentially can be accomplished. We expect that although it would take a significant amount of effort on the part of each individual, 100% of the target annual profitability level can be achieved for the year. We assume any amount in excess of the target annual profitability goal would be difficult to achieve without extraordinary effort or the occurrence of significant and unforeseen changes in the competitive landscape. Each executive officer has a designated percentage of base salary for the calendar year that can be earned for achieving 100% of his or her respective annual profitability goal. For 2023, based on input from Semler Brossy, and consistent with common practices in the market, the threshold for the 2023 Cash Bonus Plan is such that 90% achievement will result in 50% bonus eligibility. Achievement below 90% results in zero payout. At 110% achievement, the plan pays a maximum of two times the bonus target for profitability. Achievement and resulting bonus payouts for performance between Threshold and Target, and for performance between Target and Maximum, are determined based on straight-line interpolation.


	% of Goal Achieved		% of Bonus Earned
Below		< 90%		0
Threshold		90%		50%
Target		100%		100%
Maximum		110%		200%

Component 2—Personal Annual Priorities:

The second component for the Cash Bonus Plan measures each executive officer’s success at accomplishing his or her personal annual priorities. Final determination of the personal annual priorities for each executive officer rests with the Chief Executive Officer (other than the personal annual priorities of the Chief Executive Officer, which are determined by the Compensation Committee, after consultation with the Chairman of the Board of Directors and separately with all independent directors). These personal annual priorities are measured periodically throughout the year and paid annually, using a collaborative process between the Chief Executive Officer or the Executive Vice President and each executive officer. The personal annual priorities generally are comprised of a maximum of four (4) items deemed to be the most critical priorities that require action to be taken for the current evaluation period. Each priority is weighted according to (1) the critical nature of the priority relative to other priorities; and (2) the amount of time and effort involved in accomplishing the priority relative to other priorities.

Listed below under “2023 Cash Bonus Plan Percentages” is a schedule identifying each NEO and the percentage amounts of base salary for calendar year 2023 that could have been earned under this component for achieving a 100% rating for all personal priorities. Each personal annual priority goal represents a challenge and complete success is not always solely in the control of the executive officer. There are factors that may affect the outcome, including changes in market conditions and unanticipated variables. Each personal annual priority is measured and the overall weighted average of achievement for all personal annual priorities is multiplied by the total percentage of base salary allotted to personal annual priorities available to each executive officer. The Compensation Committee annually uses its discretion to allocate specific percentages of profitability and personal annual priorities for each executive officer.

2023 Cash Bonus Plan Percentages:

Based on each named executive officer’s performance results in 2022, the outlook for the Company in 2023, and Mr. Hanna’s input for executive officers other than himself, the Compensation Committee considered and approved the Cash Bonus Plan percentages for the profitability goal and the personal annual priorities components in 2023 for the NEOs as shown in the table below (which includes percentages applicable if the target is met for each goal, as well as the maximum percentages applicable if the target is exceeded for each goal).


								Adjusted EBITDA(1)								Individual Component(2)
Name	2023 Base		Target bonus as % of Base			2023 Target Bonus $		Wt.			% Earned			Payout $		Wt.			% Earned			Payout $		Total Payout $		Total Payout as % of Target
Joseph F. Hanna	$	800,000		100.0	%	$	800,000		75.0	%		156.4	%	$	938,400		25.0	%		96.1	%	$	192,200	$	1,130,600		141.3	%
Keith E. Pratt	$	500,000		60.0	%	$	300,000		75.0	%		156.4	%	$	351,900		25.0	%		100.0	%	$	75,000	$	426,900		142.3	%
Philip B. Hawkins	$	380,000		60.0	%	$	228,000		75.0	%		180.0	%	$	307,800		25.0	%		97.8	%	$	55,746	$	363,546		159.5	%
Gilda Malek	$	400,000		50.0	%	$	200,000		75.0	%		156.4	%	$	183,824		25.0	%		127.6	%	$	50,000	$	233,824		149.2	%
Kristina Van Trease	$	330,000		60.0	%	$	198,000		75.0	%		156.4	%	$	232,254		25.0	%		100.0	%	$	49,500	$	281,754		142.3	%

(1)	Maximum payout for Adjusted EBITDA is 200% of target.

(2)	Maximum payout for Individual Component is 100% of target.

Under the terms of the 2023 Cash Bonus Plan, in the event of a named executive officer’s termination by the Company without cause or a resignation for good reason, which occurs prior to the end of the fiscal year, the bonus will be prorated based on the number of days such named executive officer was employed prior to such termination for the year of termination, with the bonus amount calculated as follows: (i) for the profitability component, the target bonus amount, and (ii) for the priorities component, full satisfaction of the specified priorities. In the event of a change of control, the bonus will be prorated based on the number of days the named executive officer was employed prior to the change of control, with the bonus amount calculated as follows: (i) for the profitability component, the target bonus amount, and (ii) for the priorities component, full satisfaction of the specified priorities.

2023 Goals and Results:

With respect to annual profitability goals:

•

Messrs. Hanna and Pratt and Mses. Malek and Van Trease’s Company profitability goal for Adjusted EBITDA was $304,797,000, and results achieved were $321,974,000, or 105.64% of plan, resulting in a 156.40% payout for this incentive compensation component.

•

Mr. Hawkins had division-specific profitability goal for Adjusted EBITDA of $165,669,000. Results achieved were $191,990,000, or 115.89% of plan, resulting in a 200% payout for this incentive compensation component.

With respect to personal annual priorities goals:

•

Mr. Hanna achieved 96.1% of his 2023 personal annual priorities goals, consisting of implementing and executing on the Company’s growth strategy, supporting the growth of the key Mobile Modular strategic initiatives, land optimization, and execution of our M&A strategy.

•

Mr. Pratt achieved 100% of his 2023 personal annual priorities goals, consisting of supporting the Company’s growth strategy, maximizing shareholder value, supporting initiatives to maximize the benefits from the Vesta acquisition, and supporting the development of additional organizational strengths and capabilities.

•

Mr. Hawkins achieved 97.8% of his 2023 personal annual priorities goals, consisting of executing the Company’s core business initiatives, delivery of strategic initiatives, and successful closing and integration of the Company’s acquisition of Vesta Modular.

•

Ms. Malek achieved 100% of her 2023 personal annual priorities goals, consisting of Corporate Secretary responsibilities, enhancements of risk management framework, improved safety performance, oversight of corporate legal matters, and other organizational excellence initiatives.

•

Ms. Van Trease achieved 100% of her 2023 personal annual priorities goals, consisting of M&A activities for 2023, land optimization, and support efforts that optimize the Company’s core performance.

The Annual Bonus amounts under the Cash Bonus Plan paid to each of the named executive officers are also listed in column (g) in the “Summary Compensation Table” in this Proxy Statement.

Long-Term Incentive Compensation

2023 Long-Term Equity Incentives

• The Company’s long-term incentive program encourages a long-term focus through the use of equity compensation, the value of which is dependent on the Company’s long-term financial performance as well as the performance of our common stock.

• Each Company executive is granted a target value of long-term equity incentives, which is divided between two forms of equity vehicles. The numbers of shares granted to each NEO is equal to the target value of each vehicle divided by the closing share price of our common stock on the date of grant of ($104.26 on February 24, 2023).

• In 2023, Company executives were awarded performance based restricted stock units (“PSUs”) and time-based restricted stock units (“RSUs”)

• Approximately half of the executive’s long-term awards are in the form of PSUs contingent on the performance of three-year ROIC and revenue targets, emphasizing long-term financial performance.

• The remaining half, consisting of time-based RSUs, support the retention of our management team and reward executives for sustained share price appreciation.

Note: Mr. Hanna, our CEO, received 63% of his equity in 2023 in the form of PSUs, with the remaining 37% in the form of time-based RSUs, placing a majority of his equity compensation “at-risk”. Ms. Malek was hired on March 21, 2023, and was granted RSUs on March 31, 2023, with a grant date fair value of $400,300. She did not receive any PSUs in 2023.

2023 Long-Term Incentive Compensation Equity Grants


	Target LTI $		Performance-Vested RSUs						Time-Vested RSUs
Name	Target LTI $		% of Target LTI		# of Units Granted		$ Value		% of Target LTI			# of Units Granted		$ Value
Joseph F. Hanna	$	2,700,000		63%		16,310	$	1,700,000		37	%		9,590	$	1,000,000
Keith E. Pratt	$	750,000		50%		3,600	$	375,000		50	%		3,600	$	375,000
Philip B. Hawkins	$	410,000		50%		1,970	$	205,000		50	%		1,970	$	205,000
Gilda Malek⁽¹⁾	$	400,000		—		—		—		100	%		4,290	$	400,000
Kristina Van Trease	$	320,000		50%		1,530	$	160,000		50	%		1,530	$	160,000

(1)	Ms. Malek was hired in 2023. The target LTI dollar value and grants shown in the table above reflect the value of her new hire award. Ms. Malek’s annualized target LTI was $400,000.

Performance-Based Restricted Stock Units (“PSUs”):

PSUs granted in 2023 are earned based upon achievement of a three-year corporate ROIC target (for corporate executive officers; division specific ROIC targets for divisional executive officers) and a revenue target, each weighed equally. Having each divisional officer’s performance tied directly to his or her respective division’s performance allows for that officer to be measured with diminished influence, positive or negative, of any other division’s performance. With respect to the ROIC and revenue targets, the awards have at least a 50% payout for threshold achievement, 100% payouts for target achievement and 200% payouts for maximum achievement, with linear interpolation between performance levels. If performance is below threshold, no payout is delivered. The PSUs cliff vest following the completion of the three-year performance period, subject to continued service and achievement of the performance goals.

Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs”):

The 2023 time-based RSUs vest in three annual installments over three years based on the continued service of the executive.

2021-2023 PSU Achievement


Name	2021-2023 Actual Performance		2021-2023 Target PSUs		2021-2023 PSUs Earned
Joseph F. Hanna(1)		200%		8,020		16,040
Keith E. Pratt		200%		3,050		6,100
Philip B. Hawkins		200%		1,920		3,840
Gilda Malek(2)		—		—		—
Kristina Van Trease(3)		—		—		—

(1)	Mr. Hanna’s 2023 PSU award received a higher weighting of PSUs.

(2)	Ms. Malek was hired on March 21, 2023, and did not receive 2021 PSUs.

(3)	Ms. Van Trease’s 2021 PSU awards were forfeited as a result of the Adler Tank Rentals divestiture on February 1, 2023.

2024 McGrath Equity Awards

In past years, including in calendar year 2023, the Compensation Committee approved long-term incentive compensation awards for the Company’s executive officers that have 50% of the equity value granted as performance-based RSUs, vesting at the end of each three-year performance period, and 50% of the equity value granted as service-based RSUs vesting over three years. In December 2023, prior to the signing of the Merger

Agreement, the Compensation Committee had preliminarily approved the amount of long-term incentive compensation awards for the Company’s executive officers for calendar year 2024, without specifying the form of such long-term incentive compensation awards. In connection with the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, the Company and WillScot agreed that long-term incentive compensation awards granted in February 2024 would be granted 100% in the form of service-based RSUs, as opposed to the Company’s historic practice of granting awards 50% in the form of performance-based RSUs, due to the impracticality of setting and measuring long-term Company performance goals during the then pending transaction. Accordingly, on February 23, 2024, the Compensation Committee granted long-term incentive compensation awards 100% in the form of service-vesting RSU awards to each of its executive officers that vest 33% on the first anniversary of the grant date, 33% on the second anniversary of the grant date and 34% on the third anniversary of the grant date. If the employment of any of the Company’s executive officers is terminated without cause or the executive officer resigns for good reason within 12 months after a change in control transaction (as defined in the award agreement), subject to a release of claims, all of such executive officer’s service-vesting RSUs granted on February 23, 2024 would accelerate and vest upon such termination of employment. The Compensation Committee intends to generally revert to its historical approach on equity grants to executive officers subsequent to termination of the Merger Agreement and the Company continuing to operate as a standalone company.

Executive Officer Stock Ownership and Stock Holdback Guidelines

The Board of Directors believes that, in order to better align the interests of management and shareholders, executive officers should have a significant financial (equity) stake in the Company. Each executive officer has a target level of Company Common Stock value to achieve within seven (7) years of his or her date of hire. The target level of Common Stock value to be achieved is a multiple of each executive officer’s base salary. The multiples of executive officer base salary are four (4) times for the Chief Executive Officer and two (2) times for all other executive officer positions. In evaluating whether the Common Stock value ownership guideline has been met, all shares of Common Stock owned, in the McGrath RentCorp Employee Stock Ownership and 401(k) Plan (“KSOP”) shares and 50% of the value (market price less strike price) of all vested unexercised stock options are considered. The Board of Directors evaluates whether exceptions should be made for any executive officer on whom this requirement would impose a financial hardship.

It is the Company’s policy that each executive officer has a 10% holdback provision for RSU equity grant settlements to facilitate earlier achievement of stock ownership under the Company’s stock ownership guidelines.

Equity Granting Policy

In 2007, the Board of Directors adopted an equity granting methodology whereby there is one annual equity grant date, which is the date when the blackout window opens after the year-end earnings are released. All designated non-employee directors, executive officers, and key employees are eligible to receive an equity grant on the annual equity grant date with an exercise price (for stock options or SARs) or grant price (for RSUs), equal to the NASDAQ Stock Market close price on that day. The Board of Directors may authorize the Chief Executive Officer an additional allotment of options or shares to be granted at his discretion to new hires and promotion candidates, other than executive officers, over the course of a given time frame, with the grant date and exercise or grant price based on the last trading day of each month of the employment event. This allotment is not available to executive officers, as all grants to executive officers must be made by the Compensation Committee.

Compensation Recoupment Policy

In 2011, the Board of Directors adopted a Compensation Recoupment Policy that applies to executive officers if the Company is required to restate its financial statements. The Board believes it is desirable and in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders to maintain and enhance a culture that is focused on integrity and accountability and believes that this policy discourages conduct detrimental to the Company’s sustained

growth. In 2023, the Board of Directors adopted the Company’s Amended and Restated Compensation Recoupment Policy (the “Policy”) in accordance with the NASDAQ Stock Market listing standards and Rule 10D-1 under the Exchange Act. The Policy requires any current or former executive officer, in the event of a financial restatement, to reimburse the Company with respect to any incentive compensation (including cash and equity awards) received during the past three years that is in excess of that which would have been received if such compensation had been based upon the financial statements as so restated. The Policy is posted on our website at www.mgrc.com under the Investors/Corporate Governance section.

Risk-Hedging Policies

Pursuant to the Company’s Insider Trading and Blackout Policy, officers and directors of the Company are prohibited from engaging in short-term or speculative securities transactions with respect to the Company’s Common Stock. These prohibited transactions can have the effect of reducing or canceling the risk of an investment in the Common Stock, particularly in the short-term. These prohibited transactions may create the appearance that the executives are trading on inside information. Additionally, certain forms of hedging or monetization transactions allow a shareholder to lock in much of the value of his or her stock holdings, often in exchange for all or part of the potential for upside appreciation in the stock. These transactions allow the holder to continue to own the covered securities but without full risks and rewards of ownership. Therefore, Company personnel are also specifically prohibited from engaging in short sales, hedging transactions, buying or selling puts or calls, buying any of the Company’s securities on margin, pledging transactions, and engaging in derivative transactions related to the Company’s securities (such as exchange-traded options). The Company’s Insider Trading Policy further provides that Company personnel who purchase or sell Company securities in the open market may not correspondingly sell or purchase any Company securities of the same class during the six months following the purchase. The Insider Trading Policy is posted on our website at www.mgrc.com under the Investors/Corporate Governance section.

Perquisites and Other Personal Benefits

Executive officers are entitled to and eligible only for the same fringe benefits for which all of our employees are eligible. We do not have programs in place to provide personal perquisites for any employee. Our healthcare and other insurance programs, including the programs’ participation costs, are the same for all eligible employees, except that any executive officer employed with the Company for at least 10 years may remain on the Company’s health insurance policy after retiring from the Company, provided that such executive officer pays 100% of the premiums. Our annual matching contributions to the Company’s Employee Stock Ownership and 401(k) Plan (“KSOP”), expressed as a percentage of eligible wages, up to a stated percentage of eligible wages (and any discretionary contributions that we may make to the KSOP, expressed as a percentage of eligible wages), are also the same for all eligible employees, including each named executive officer, subject to all applicable Internal Revenue Service contribution limits and formulas for plans of these types.

Change in Control Arrangements

The Company maintains a “Change in Control Severance Plan” for our CEO and CFO. The Change in Control Severance Plan as approved in 2013, contained an initial two-year term with no automatic renewal, though the Board of Directors and the Compensation Committee has renewed it since that time and most recently made changes to the Plan in February 2022. The Compensation Committee adopted the Change in Control Severance Plan to help ensure appropriate behavior by individuals in key management roles in evaluating, presenting, and acting upon change in control opportunities involving the Company that may arise. The Compensation Committee believes that maintaining this Change in Control Severance Plan is in the best interests of shareholders in helping to ensure (a) the individuals in those management roles most likely to influence a change in control opportunity are appropriately incentivized to act in the best interests of shareholders; (b) continuity of management before and during an impending transaction, or the need for continuity in management after a change in control; and (c) the Company’s continuing ability to attract talented senior

management members, as well as to avoid executives departing due to limited or no remuneration protections in the event of a change in control transaction. Further, the Compensation Committee believes that stable corporate leadership exhibiting the desired management behaviors is imperative for shareholders to be in a position to realize a favorable premium in the potential sale of the Company.

Under the Change in Control Severance Plan, each of Messrs. Hanna and Pratt is entitled to severance payments and termination benefits upon a termination of their employment that is a qualifying termination under the Change in Control Severance Plan. Under the Change in Control Severance Plan, if Messrs. Hanna’s or Pratt’s employment is terminated without cause or for good reason within 12 months following a change in control, subject to a release of claims, they are entitled to: (i) two times annual base salary; (ii) two times target bonus for the year of termination; (c) medical benefits under COBRA for up to 24 months for Mr. Hanna and 12 months for Mr. Pratt; (d) outplacement assistance in accordance with the applicable McGrath policies and guidelines in effect immediately prior to termination of employment; and (e) full acceleration and vesting of any and all equity awards. The Change in Control Severance Plan does not provide for a tax gross-up.

Involuntary Termination Severance Plan for Officers

The Compensation Committee established a formal Involuntary Termination Severance Plan for Officers (the “Severance Plan”) to address involuntary termination severance eligibility and payments for executive officer-level positions. The Compensation Committee believes that maintaining this Severance Plan is in the best interests of shareholders in helping to ensure the Company’s continuing ability to attract and retain talented senior executives. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023, all of our NEOs have been selected by the Compensation Committee to be covered by the Severance Plan.

Under the Severance Plan, upon a termination by the Company without cause prior to a change in control or after 12 months following a change in control, subject to a release of claims, our NEOs are entitled to the following severance benefits: (a) for Messrs. Hanna and Pratt, a severance payment of up to the equivalent of 12 months of base salary, and for other NEOs, a severance payment of up to the equivalent of 6 months of base salary, (b) medical benefits under COBRA for up to 12 months, and (c) outplacement assistance in accordance with the applicable Company policies and guidelines in effect immediately prior to termination of employment. In the cases of Messrs. Hanna and Pratt, if they are eligible to receive severance benefits under the Change in Control Severance Plan, they would not also be eligible to receive severance benefits under the Severance Plan, but would instead receive the benefits described under Change in Control Severance Plan above.

Under the Severance Plan, upon a termination by the Company without cause or a resignation for good reason within 12 months after a change in control, subject to a release of claims, each NEO other than Messrs. Hanna and Pratt are entitled to receive (a) a severance payment of up to the equivalent of 6 months of base salary, (b) medical benefits under COBRA for up to 12 months, (c) full acceleration and vesting of any and all equity awards, and (d) outplacement assistance in accordance with the applicable Company policies and guidelines in effect immediately prior to termination of employment. The Severance Plan does not provide for a tax gross-up.

In addition, the Company’s annual cash bonus plan for executive officers generally provides that upon such executive officer’s termination of employment without cause or resignation for good reason, which occurs prior to the end of the plan term, such executive officer would receive a pro-rated bonus based on the number of days of employment prior to such termination for the plan year, with the bonus amount calculated based on full satisfaction of the target components under the plan. If an executive officer’s employment is terminated without cause or an executive officer resigns for good reason in the middle of a plan year, such executive officer would be entitled to a pro-rated annual bonus for the year of termination.

Acceleration Under Equity Plans

The Company’s existing equity compensation plans provide for full acceleration of equity awards upon a qualifying termination after a change in control for all employees of the Company.

The Company’s existing equity compensation plans also provide for full acceleration of equity awards in the event that the equity awards are not assumed or replaced in a change in control situation. In addition, pursuant to the terms of the award agreements, in the event that a change in control occurs before the applicable performance result is determined, all outstanding 2023 PSUs will become vested, assuming achievement of target performance, on a pro-rated basis based on the date of such change in control.

In addition, the covered employee shall enjoy any additional rights provided under the terms of an equity compensation award, including but not limited to the terms of the Company’s 2016 Stock Incentive Plan, 2007 Stock Incentive Plan, or any other Company equity plan. The Compensation Committee believes that providing this vesting acceleration assists us in attracting and retaining key employees, including our executives, and promotes stability and continuity of our key employees, which we believe is in the best interests of our shareholders. For details, see “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control” in this Proxy Statement.

Tax and Accounting Implications

Deductibility of Executive Compensation

Section 162(m) of the Code generally limits our corporate tax deduction for compensation paid to certain executive officers to $1 million per year. Prior to December 22, 2017, when the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (“TCJA”) was signed into law, this limitation did not apply to compensation that qualified as “performance-based” compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code. Under the TCJA, this “performance-based” exception was repealed for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017, except with respect to certain “grandfathered” compensation.

The Compensation Committee intends to maximize our ability to deduct executive compensation for tax purposes to the extent structuring our executive compensation for tax purposes is in alignment with our compensation philosophy. The Compensation Committee nonetheless reserves the right to use its judgment to authorize compensation payments that may not be deductible when the committee believes that such payments are appropriate and in the best interests of our shareholders, after taking into account changing business conditions or the executive officer’s performance.

Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation

We accrue our named executive officers’ salaries and incentive awards as an expense when earned. For our stock-based compensation, the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, Compensation—Stock Compensation (“ASC 718”), requires us to recognize compensation expense within our income statement for all share-based payment arrangements, which includes employee stock option plans. The expense is based on the grant-date fair value of the equity award granted and is recognized ratably over the requisite service period. The Compensation Committee considers the expense of equity awards as part of its overall evaluation of our equity compensation program.

Compensation Policies and Practices and Risk Management

The Compensation Committee considers potential risks when reviewing and approving the compensation programs for our executive officers and other employees. We have designed our compensation programs, including our incentive compensation plans, with specific features to address potential risks while rewarding employees for achieving long-term financial and strategic objectives through prudent business judgment and appropriate risk-taking. The following elements have been incorporated in our programs available for our executive officers:

•

A Balanced Mix of Compensation Components—The target compensation mix for our executive officers is composed of base salary, annual cash bonus incentives, and long-term equity awards.

•

Multiple Performance Factors—Our incentive compensation plans use both company-wide metrics and individual annual priorities, which encourage a focus on the achievement of objectives for the overall benefit of the Company.

•

Different Performance Metrics—We generally use different performance metrics between our cash bonus and performance RSU programs, providing a balance and mitigating against the potential for undue risk in meeting a single goal.

•

Realistic Performance Goals—Financial performance goals in our performance-based incentive plans are set at levels that are intended to be attainable without the need to take inappropriate risks.

•

Capped Incentive Awards—Payouts for both the annual cash bonus incentive awards and our performance RSUs are capped for our executive officers.

•

Stock Ownership Guidelines—Our stock ownership guidelines align the interests of our executive officers with preservation and appreciation of stockholder value over time.

•

Multi-Year Vesting—Equity awards vest over multiple years, requiring long-term commitment on the part of employees.

•

Competitive Positioning—The Compensation Committee considers our executive compensation program structure and levels relative to our peers. The Compensation Committee generally targets total compensation to be in a market competitive range relative to our peer group and compensation survey data.

•

Corporate Governance Programs—We have implemented corporate governance guidelines, a code of conduct, a compensation recoupment policy, and other corporate governance measures and internal controls.

The Compensation Committee also reviews the key design elements of our compensation programs in relation to industry practices, as well as the means by which any potential risks may be mitigated, such as through our internal controls and oversight by management and the board. As a result of this review, the Compensation Committee concluded that, based on a combination of factors, our compensation policies and practices do not incentivize excessive risk-taking that could have a material adverse effect on the Company.

Compensation Committee Report

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in any of the Company’s previous filings under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), or the Exchange Act, that might incorporate future filings, including this Proxy Statement, with the SEC, in whole or in part, the following report shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any such filings, nor shall the following report be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any future filings under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, unless specifically stated to be incorporated by reference therein.

The Compensation Committee of the Company has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K with management and, based on such review and discussions, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement.

Submitted by the Compensation Committee:

Kimberly A. Box, Chair

Nicolas C. Anderson

William J. Dawson

Bradley M. Shuster

Summary Compensation Table

The following table provides summary information concerning the compensation earned during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2023, December 31, 2022, and December 31, 2021, by each of our named executive officers.

Summary Compensation Table(1)


(a)	(b)		(c)		(d)		(e)		(f)		(g)		(h)		(i)		(j)
Name and Principal Position	Year		Salary ($)		Bonus ($)		Stock Awards ($)(2)		Option Awards ($)(2)		Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)(3)		Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($)		All Other Compensation ($)(4)		Total ($)
Joseph F. Hanna		2023		$800,000		—		$2,700,334		—		$1,130,600		—		$140,964		$4,771,898
President and Chief Executive Officer		2022		$700,000		—		$1,350,376		—		$965,913		—		$104,878		$3,121,167
President and Chief Executive Officer		2021		$663,344		—		$1,875,010		—		$580,509		—		$142,817		$3,261,680
Keith E. Pratt		2023		$500,000		—		$750,672		—		$426,900		—		$61,931		$1,739,503
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Assistant Corporate Secretary		2022		$480,000		—		$524,876		—		$385,248		—		$43,993		$1,434,117
		2021		$465,619		—		$523,045		—		$256,742		—		$70,621		$1,316,027

Philip B. Hawkins		2023		$380,000		—		$410,784		—		$363,546		—		$43,613		$1,197,943
Senior Vice President and Division Manager, Mobile Modular		2022		$350,000		—		$325,000		—		$209,167		—		$30,999		$915,166
		2021		$317,723		—		$366,677		—		$165,180		—		$48,228		$897,808

Gilda Malek(5)		2023		$313,425		—		$400,300		—		$233,823		—		—		$947,548
Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary		2022		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
		2021		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—

Kristina Van Trease		2023		$330,000		—		$479,596		—		$281,754		—		$23,650		$1,115,000
Senior Vice President, Chief Strategy Officer		2022		$316,000		—		$255,126		—		$258,749		—		$27,518		$857,393
Senior Vice President, Chief Strategy Officer		2021		$286,893		—		$228,082		—		$131,259		—		$27,586		$673,820

(1)	Amounts disclosed in this and other tables may minimally vary from amounts presented within the CD&A narrative due to rounding to the nearest dollar for tabular purposes.

(2)

The amounts in columns (e) and (f) reflect the aggregate grant date fair value amounts, in accordance with ASC the 718, of awards granted pursuant to the 2016 Plan. RSUs were granted to our NEOs on February 24, 2023, with a grant date fair value of $999,853 for Mr. Hanna; $375,336 for Mr. Pratt; $205,392 for Mr. Hawkins; and $320,078 for Ms. Van Trease. Ms. Malek was hired on March 21, 2023, and was granted RSUs on March 31, 2023, with a grant date fair value of $400,300. The grant date fair value of each RSU granted to the NEOs, except for Ms. Malek, is equal to the closing share price of our common stock on the date of grant of $104.26. The grant date fair value of the RSUs granted to Ms. Malek is equal to the closing share price of our common stock on the grant date of March 31, 2023, of $93.31. The PSUs were granted to our NEOs on February 24, 2023, with a grant date fair value of $1,700,481 for Mr. Hanna; $375,336 for Mr. Pratt; $205,392 for Mr. Hawkins; and $159,518 for Ms. Van Trease, based on target level of performance. Ms. Malek did not receive PSUs in 2023. If the maximum level of performance were achieved, each NEO would earn 200% of the target number of PSUs awarded. Based on the closing price of our common stock on the grant date, the maximum value of the PSUs awarded to each NEO is as follows: Mr. Hanna — $3,400,961; Mr. Pratt — $750,672; Mr. Hawkins — $410,784; and Ms. Van Trease — $319,036. Assumptions used in the calculation of these amounts are included in the notes of the Company’s audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023, included in the 2023 Annual Report. These amounts reflect the Company’s accounting expense and do not correspond to the actual value that may be realized by the named executive officers.

(3)	The amounts in column (g) reflect amounts earned by the named executive officers during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023, and paid in 2024 pursuant to the Cash Bonus Plan. See “Non-Equity Performance-Based Incentive Plan Compensation” in this Proxy Statement for additional detail.

(4)

The amounts in column (i) reflect the cash contributions allocated to each named executive officer pursuant to the provisions of the Company’s Employee Stock Ownership and 401(k) Plan and dividend equivalent payouts for vested RSUs and PSUs that were not factored into the grant date fair values of such RSUs and PSUs. The table below details the amounts paid to each named executive officer.

(5)	Ms. Malek was hired by the Company effective March 21, 2023.


Name	Year	Employee Stock Ownership and 401(k) Plan Cash Contribution ($)		RSU and PSU Dividend Payments ($)		Total ($)
Joseph F. Hanna	2023		$13,200		$127,764		$140,964
	2022		$12,200		$ 92,678		$104,878
	2021		$11,600		$131,217		$142,817
Keith E. Pratt	2023		$13,200		$48,731		$61,931
	2022		$12,200		$31,793		$70,621
	2021		$11,600		$59,021		$73,929
Philip B. Hawkins	2023		$13,200		$30,413		$43,613
	2022		$12,200		$18,799		$30,999
	2021		$11,600		$36,628		$48,228
Gilda Malek	2023		—		—		—
	2022		—		—		—
	2021		—		—		—
Kristina Van Trease	2023		$13,200		$10,450		$23,650
	2022		$12,200		$15,318		$27,518
	2021		$11,600		$15,986		$27,586

2023 GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS


			Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards (1)						Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards (2)						All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units (#) (3)		All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options (#)		Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards ($/Sh)		Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards (4)
Name	Grant Date		Threshold ($)		Target ($)		Maximum ($)		Threshold (#)		Target (#)		Maximum (#)
Joseph F. Hanna			$	500,000	$	800,000	$	1,400,000		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
		2/24/2023		—		—		—		8,155		16,310		32,620		9,590		—		—	$	2,700,334
Keith E. Pratt			$	187,500	$	300,000	$	525,000		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
		2/24/2023		—		—		—		1,800		3,600		7,200		3,600		—		—	$	750,672
Philip B. Hawkins			$	142,500	$	228,000	$	399,000		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
		2/24/2023		—		—		—		985		1970		3,940		1,970		—		—	$	410,784
Gilda Malek			$	125,000	$	200,000	$	350,000		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
		3/31/2023		—		—		—		—		—		—		4,290		—		—	$	400,300
Kristina Van Trease			$	123,750	$	198,000	$	346,500		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
		2/24/2023 2/24/2023		—		—		—		765		1,530		3,060		1,530 1,540		—		—	$	479,596

(1)

The amounts listed in these columns reflect the threshold, target and maximum amounts payable to the named executive officers pursuant to the Cash Bonus Plan. See “Non-Equity Performance-Based Incentive Plan Compensation” for additional detail. The threshold assumptions assume achieving 90% of the profitability target and no achievement of the personal annual priorities.

(2)

Each named executive officer received a grant of PSUs which are subject to a performance-based vesting component at the end of a three-year performance period, except for Ms. Malek, who did not receive any performance-based RSUs for 2023. Unless earlier forfeited under the terms of the PSUs, each PSU vests and converts into no less than 50% and no more than 200% of one share of Common Stock. The PSUs vest 100% at the end of the three-year performance period if the performance goal is satisfied.

(3)

On February 24, 2023, each named executive officer, except for Ms. Malek, who received her grant on March 31, 2023, received a grant of time-based RSUs that vest 33% on each anniversary of the grant date until fully vested. Each unit represents a right to receive one share of Common Stock or an amount equal to the fair market value of the Common Stock underlying the unit on the vesting date. Ms. Van Trease received an additional time-based RSU grant on February 24, 2023 of 1,540 shares to replace the February 25, 2021 PSU grant that was forfeited due to the sale of Adler Tank Rentals on February 1, 2023.

(4)

The amounts listed in this column reflect the maximum amount payable to the named executive officers under the terms of the PSUs. Each PSU vests and converts into no less than 50% and no more than 200% of one share of the Company’s common stock amounts payable to the named executive officers. The amounts in the table above reflect the probable performance outcome of a maximum payout of 200%. See “Long-Term Incentive Compensation” for additional detail.

2023 OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END


	Option Awards										Stock Awards
	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#)		Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#)		Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options (#)		Option Exercise Price ($)		Option Expiration Date		Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)		Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($)		Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#)		Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($)
	Exercisable		Unexercisable
Joseph F. Hanna		—		—		—		—		—		2,674(1)	$	319,864		8,310(4)	$	994,042
												16,040(2)	$	1,918,705		16,310(6)	$	1,951,002
												5,541(3)	$	662,814
												9,590(5)	$	1,147,156

Keith E. Pratt		—		—		—		—		—		1,017(1)	$	121,654		3,230(4)	$	386,373
												6,100(2)	$	729,682		3,600(6)	$	430,632
												2,154(3)	$	257,661
												3,600(5)	$	430,632

Philip B. Hawkins		—		—		—		—		—		641(1)	$	76,676		2,000(4)	$	239,240
												3,840(2)	$	459,341		1,970(6)	$	235,651
												1,334(3)	$	159,573
												1,970(5)	$	235,651

Gilda Malek		—		—		—		—		—		4,290(5)	$	513,170		—		—

Kristina Van Trease		—		—		—		—		—		514(1)	$	61,485		1,570(4)	$	187,803
												1,047(3)	$	125,242		1,530(6)	$	183,019
												1,530(5)	$	183,019
												1,540(7)	$	184,215

Represents RSUs granted on February 25, 2021, with 33% vesting on the first annual anniversary of the grant; 33% vesting on the second annual anniversary of the grant; and 34% vesting on the third annual anniversary of the grant. Each RSU represents a right to receive one share of common stock or an amount equal to the fair market value of the Company’s common stock underlying the unit on the vesting date, with vesting dates of 2/25/22, 2/25/23, and 2/25/24.

Represents PSUs granted on February 25, 2021, which have been earned at 200% of target as a result of achieving the performance conditions at maximum level during the three-year performance period ending on December 31, 2023, which PSUs remained subject to time-based vesting conditions and vested on February 25, 2024.

Represents RSUs granted on February 25, 2022, with 33% vesting on the first annual anniversary of the grant; 33% vesting on the second annual anniversary of the grant; and 34% vesting on the third annual anniversary of the grant. Each RSU represents a right to receive one share of the Company’s common stock or an amount equal to the fair market value of the Company’s common stock underlying the unit on the vesting date, with vesting dates of 2/25/23, 2/25/24, and 2/25/25.

Represents PSUs granted on February 25, 2022 that are subject to a performance-based vesting component at the end of a three-year performance period. Unless earlier forfeited under the terms of the PSUs, each PSU vests and converts into no less than 50% and no more than 200% of one share of the Company’s common stock. The PSUs vest 100% at the end of the three-year performance period if the performance goal is satisfied, with a vesting date of 2/25/25.

Represents RSUs granted on February 24, 2023, with 33% vesting on the first annual anniversary of the grant; 33% vesting on the second annual anniversary of the grant; and 34% vesting on the third annual anniversary of the grant. Each RSU represents a right to receive one share of the Company’s common stock or an amount equal to the fair market value of the Company’s common stock underlying the unit on the vesting date, with vesting dates of 2/24/24, 2/24/25, and 2/24/26. Except for Ms. Malek who received her RSU grant on March 31, 2023 with vesting dates of 3/31/24, 3/31/25, and 3/31/26.

Represents PSUs granted on February 24, 2023 that are subject to a performance-based vesting component at the end of a three-year performance period. Unless earlier forfeited under the terms of the PSUs, each PSU vests and converts into no less than 50% and no more than 200% of one share of the Company’s common stock. The PSUs vest 100% at the end of the three-year performance period if the performance goal is satisfied, with a vesting date of 2/24/26.

Represents RSUs granted on February 24, 2023, 100% of which vest on the first annual anniversary of the grant. Each RSU represents a right to receive one share of the Company’s common stock or an amount equal to the fair market value of the Company’s common stock underlying the unit on the vesting date, with a vesting date of 2/24/24.

2023 OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED


	Option Awards				Stock Awards
Name	Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#)		Value Realized on Exercise ($) (1)		Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#)		Value Realized on Vesting ($)
Joseph F. Hanna		56,000	$	3,721,760		22,268	$	2,269,191
Keith E. Pratt		16,000	$	1,058,880		7,160	$	729,404
Philip B. Hawkins		5,280	$	351,067		4,259	$	433,991
Gilda Malek		—	$	—		—	$	—
Kristina Van Trease		5,845	$	373,729		3,458	$	352,317

(1)

The “value realized on exercise” represents the number of shares of Common Stock acquired on exercise of the applicable option multiplied by the NASDAQ Stock Market close price of our Common Stock on the applicable date of exercise, less the number of shares of the Company’s common stock acquired on exercise of the option multiplied by the exercise price of the option.

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans

The following table provides information regarding our equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2023:

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION


Plan Category	Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights		Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights		Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a))
	(a)		(b)		(c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders		240	$	34.57		1,123,946
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders		—	$	—		—
Total		240	$	34.57		1,123,946

Our 2016 Stock Incentive Plan was approved by shareholders and has been filed as an exhibit to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023.

Potential Payments upon Termination or Change-in-Control

Pursuant to the terms of the agreements for the McGrath PSU awards granted during the 2022 calendar year (each, a “2022 PSU”), in the event of a change in control of the Company and such event occurs prior to the end of the three-year performance period, at the effective time of such change-in-control event, each outstanding 2022 PSU would accelerate and be deemed earned based on the McGrath Board’s good faith best estimate of projected actual performance through the end of the performance period. Assuming a change in control of the Company occurred on December 31, 2023, based on a closing NASDAQ Stock Market price of $119.62 per share on December 29, 2023, the value of the 2022 PSUs that each NEO would be entitled to is shown in the table below. The acceleration and vesting of a portion of the 2022 PSUs occurs on a change in control and is not contingent on an NEO’s termination of employment.

Pursuant to the terms of the agreements for the McGrath PSU awards granted during the 2023 calendar year (each, a “2023 PSU”), in the event of a change in control of the Company and such event occurs prior to the end of the three-year performance period, a prorated portion of the 2023 PSUs would vest assuming target performance is achieved, with the prorated portion determined based on the number of days elapsed between the grant date and the change in control event. Assuming a change in control occurred on December 31, 2023, based on a closing NASDAQ Stock Market price of $119.62 per share on December 29, 2023, the value of the 2023 PSUs that each NEO would be entitled to is shown in the table below. The acceleration and prorated vesting of a portion of the 2023 PSUs occurs on a change in control and is not contingent on an NEO’s termination of employment.


	2022 PSUs				2023 PSUs
Name	Number of PSUs		Value of PSUs		Number of PSUs		Value of PSUs
Joseph F. Hanna		16,620	$	1,988,084		4,617	$	552,328
Keith E. Pratt		6,460	$	772,745		1,019	$	121,911
Philip B. Hawkins		4,000	$	478,480		557	$	66,712
Gilda Malek(1)		—	$	—		—	$	—
Kristina Van Trease		3,140	$	375,607		433	$	51,812

(1)	Ms. Malek was hired on March 21, 2023 and therefore not granted PSUs in 2022 or 2023.

Under the terms of our Cash Bonus Plan, the 2016 Stock Incentive Plan and related equity award agreements and KSOP, as well as our Change in Control Severance Plan and Involuntary Termination Severance Plan for Officers, payments may be made to each of our named executive officers upon his or her termination of employment or a change in control (as defined in each plan) of the Company. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” and “Equity Compensation Plan Information” for a description of, and an explanation of, the specific circumstances that would trigger payments under each plan, agreement, or policy.

The following table sets forth the estimated payments that would be made to each of our named executive officers upon voluntary termination, including termination for good reason, termination not for cause, termination for cause, termination in connection with a change in control, and termination due to death or permanent disability. The payments would be made pursuant to the plans, agreements, or Company policies identified in the preceding paragraph. The information set forth in the table below assumes the termination event occurred on December 31, 2023.

The actual amounts to be paid out can only be determined at the time of an executive’s separation from the Company and may differ materially from the amounts set forth in the table below. The amounts set forth in the table below do not reflect the withholding of applicable state and federal taxes.


Name	Voluntary Resignation for Good Reason ($)		Involuntary Termination				Termination Without Cause or Resignation for Good Reason & Change in Control(3) ($)		Retirement, Death, Permanent Disability, or Resignation Without Good Reason ($)
			Without Cause(1) ($)		For Cause ($)
Joseph F. Hanna
Non-Equity Incentive Plan		800,000		800,000		0		800,000		0
Accelerated Awards Under Equity Incentive Plans(2)		0		0		0		6,588,962		0
Cash Severance		0		800,000		0		3,200,000		0
Continuation of Medical Benefits Under COBRA (present value)		0		22,354		0		44,708		0
Reasonable Outplacement Assistance		0		15,000		0		15,000		0

Total		800,000		1,637,354		0		9,848,670		0
Keith E. Pratt
Non-Equity Incentive Plan		300,000		300,000		0		300,000		0
Accelerated Awards Under Equity Incentive Plans(2)		0		0		0		2,434,288		0
Cash Severance		0		500,000		0		1,600,000		0
Continuation of Medical Benefits Under COBRA (present value)		0		34,088		0		34,088		0
Reasonable Outplacement Assistance		0		15,000		0		15,000		0

Total		300,000		849,088		0		4,083,376		0
Philip B. Hawkins
Non-Equity Incentive Plan		228,000		228,000		0		228,000		0
Accelerated Awards Under Equity Incentive Plans(2)		0		0		0		1,476,436		0
Cash Severance		0		190,000		0		190,000		0
Continuation of Medical Benefits Under COBRA (present value)		0		31,922		0		31,922		0
Reasonable Outplacement Assistance		0		7,500		0		7,500		0

Total		228,000		457,422		0		1,933,858		0
Gilda Malek
Non-Equity Incentive Plan		200,000		200,000		0		200,000		0
Accelerated Awards Under Equity Incentive Plans(2)		0		0		0		513,170		0
Cash Severance		0		200,000		0		200,000		0
Continuation of Medical Benefits Under COBRA (present value)		0		21,427		0		21,427		0
Reasonable Outplacement Assistance		0		7,500		0		7,500		0

Total		200,000		428,927		0		942,097		0
Kristina Van Trease
Non-Equity Incentive Plan		198,000		198,000		0		198,000		0
Accelerated Awards Under Equity Incentive Plans(2)		0		0		0		981,381		0
Cash Severance		0		165,000		0		165,000		0
Continuation of Medical Benefits Under COBRA (present value)		0		—		0		—		0
Reasonable Outplacement Assistance		0		7,500		0		7,500		0

Total		198,000		370,500		0		351,881		0

(1)

Represents the severance payments and benefits that the NEOs would be entitled to if a termination without cause occurs prior to or after 12 months following a change in control under the Severance Plan including (i) one year of base salary for Messrs. Hanna and Pratt and six months of base salary for Mr. Hawkins and Mses. Malek and Van Trease, (ii) 12 months of COBRA coverage payable to the NEOs (and the NEO’s spouse and dependents, as applicable) and (iii) reasonable outplacement assistance. In addition, upon a termination without cause, under the 2023 Cash Bonus Plan, each NEO would be entitled to payment of the target bonus amount pro-rated based on the date of termination. There would not be any acceleration of equity awards if a termination without cause occurs prior to or after 12 months following a change in control.

(2)

Assumes termination on the last day of the calendar year, with a closing NASDAQ Stock Market price of $119.62 per share on December 29, 2023. Under the Change in Control Severance Plan and the Severance Plan, as applicable, if a termination of employment without cause or a resignation for good reason within 12 months of a change in control of the Company, all unvested equity awards held by the NEOs would become fully vested. In addition, the award agreements for PSUs granted in 2023 provide for prorated vesting assuming target level of performance based on the number of days elapsed between the grant date and a change in control. For the 2023 PSUs only, the prorated vesting of a portion of the PSUs occurs on a change in control and is not contingent on an NEO’s termination of employment. For each NEO, the amount included represents (i) the value of 100% of their unvested RSUs, (ii) the value of 200% of their unvested 2021 PSUs based on actual performance for the performance period; and for the 2022 PSUs assuming performance is achieved at the Board’s good faith best estimate of projected actual performance through the end of the performance period, and (iii) the value of their 2023 PSUs assuming target performance and pro-rated based on the number of days elapsed between the grant date and December 31, 2023.

(3)

Represents the severance payments and benefits that the NEOs would be entitled to under the Change in Control Severance Plan and the Severance Plan, as applicable, if a termination of employment without cause or a resignation for good reason within 12 months of a change in control of the Company, including (i) for Messrs. Hanna and Pratt, an amount equal to two times the sum of their annual base salary and annual target bonus for the year of termination, and for Mses. Malek and Van Trease and Mr. Hawkins, an amount equal to 6 months of their annual base salary, (ii) 24 months COBRA coverage payable to the CEOs and 12 months of COBRA coverage payable to other NEOs (and the NEO’s spouse and dependents, as applicable), (iii) reasonable outplacement assistance and (iv) full acceleration and vesting of all equity awards. In addition, upon a termination without cause or a resignation for good reason, under the 2023 Cash Bonsu Plan, each NEO would be entitled to payment of the target bonus amount pro-rated based on the date of termination.

CEO Compensation Pay Ratio

We believe our executive compensation program must be internally consistent and equitable to motivate our employees to create shareholder value. We monitor the relationship between the compensation of our executive officers and the compensation of our non-managerial employees. For 2023, the total compensation of Joseph F. Hanna, our President and Chief Executive Officer, of $4,579,698, as shown in the “Summary Compensation Table” above, (the “CEO Compensation”), was approximately 66 times the total compensation of a median employee of $69,099, calculated in the same manner.

Our CEO to median employee pay ratio is calculated in accordance with the SEC’s rules pursuant to Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K. We identified the median employee by examining the 2023 total cash compensation for all individuals, excluding our CEO, who were employed by us on December 31, 2023, the last day of our payroll year. We included all employees, whether employed on a full-time, part-time or seasonal basis. We did not make any assumptions, adjustments or estimates with respect to total cash compensation, and we did not annualize the compensation for any full-time employees that were not employed by us for all of 2023. We believe the use of total cash compensation for all employees is a consistently applied compensation measure because we do not widely distribute annual equity awards to employees.

Treatment of Certain Compensation Elements Upon Termination

Executive Severance Policy. We do not have employment agreements. The Compensation Committee has, however, established terms and conditions to address involuntary termination severance benefits for executive officer-level positions in connection with a change in control of the Company or otherwise. For details, see both the “Change of Control Severance Plan” and “Involuntary Termination Severance Plan for Officers” discussions within the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of this Proxy Statement.

Retirement Plan. All employees who participate in our KSOP are entitled to their vested amounts upon termination of their employment.

Health and Welfare Benefit and Executive Benefits and Perquisites Continuation. An executive officer is not entitled to any continuation of his or her health and welfare benefits, executive benefits, or perquisites (other than pursuant to COBRA) following the termination of his or her employment, except that any executive officer employed with the Company for at least 10 years may remain on the Company’s health insurance policy after he or she retires from the Company, provided he or she pays 100% of the premiums.

Long-Term Incentives. Except in the circumstances discussed above, an executive officer forfeits his or her stock options or unvested shares of restricted stock upon termination of employment and is not entitled to any continuation of vesting or acceleration of vesting with respect to his or her options or unvested restricted stock awards. The executive would be, however, entitled to exercise any vested options for a period of 90 days after termination and is entitled to continue to hold his or her shares of restricted stock that had previously vested (in the same manner as any other employee of the Company). In the event of a qualifying termination following a change in control, an executive officer is entitled to the acceleration of vesting with respect to all of his or her equity awards, consistent with the Change in Control arrangements described above.

Pay Versus Performance

In accordance with rules adopted by the SEC, we provide the following disclosure regarding executive Compensation Actually Paid (“CAP”) (as calculated in accordance with SEC rules) and certain Company performance for the fiscal years listed below. See

“Executive Compensation”

in this Proxy Statement for a complete description of how executive compensation relates to Company performance and how the Compensation Committee makes its decisions.


									Year-end value of $100 invested on 12/31/2019 in:
Year	Summary Compensation Table Total for Joseph Hanna $		Compensation Actually Paid to Joseph Hanna (1)(2)(3) $		Average Summary Compensation Table Total for Non-CEO NEOs (4) $		Average Compensation Actually Paid to Non-CEO NEOs (1)(2)(3)(4) $		MGRC $		S&P 500 Industrials Index $		Net Income (in millions) $		Pre-Tax Income (in millions) $

2023		4,771,898		8,501,597		1,249,999		1,755,679		171.19		165.61		174.6		151.2
2022		3,121,167		4,871,184		1,029,825		1,480,971		138.60		126.96		115.1		150.0
2021		3,261,680		4,386,308		969,855		1,277,750		110.16		157.53		89.7		121.8
2020		2,668,399		1,108,518		857,107		360,892		90.05		123.17		102.0		132.0

(1)	Deductions from, and additions to, total compensation in the “Summary Compensation Table” by year to calculate CAP include:


	2023
	Joseph Hanna		Average Non-CEO NEOs
Total Compensation from Summary Compensation Table	$	4,771,898	$	1,249,999

Adjustments for Pension
Adjustment Summary Compensation Table Pension	$	-	$	-
Amount added for current year service cost	$	-	$	-
Amount added for prior service cost impacting current year	$	-	$	-

Total Adjustments for Pension	$	-	$	-

Adjustments for Equity Awards
Adjustment for grant date values in the Summary Compensation Table	$	2,700,334	$	510,338
Year-end fair value of unvested awards granted in the current year	$	4,600,430	$	762,488
Year-over-year difference of year-end fair values for unvested awards granted in prior years	$	969,825	$	169,598
Fair values at vest date for awards granted and vested in current year	$	-	$	-
Difference in fair values between prior year-end fair values and vest date fair values for awards granted in prior years	$	709,030	$	89,940
Forfeitures during current year equal to prior year-end fair value	$	-	$	34,213
Dividends or dividend equivalents not otherwise included in total compensation	$	150,748	$	28,206

Total Adjustments for Equity Awards	$	6,430,033	$	1,016,018

Compensation Actually Paid (as calculated)	$	8,501,597	$	1,755,679

(2)

The assumptions used in calculating the fair value of the equity awards did not differ in any material respect from the assumptions used to calculate the grant date fair value of the awards as reported in the Summary Compensation Table, except that as of the end of 2023, the fair value calculations of the PSUs

Table of Contents

granted in 2021 and 2022 assumed a payout at maximum, and the PSUs granted in 2023 assumed a payout between target and maximum, in each case as compared to the grant date fair value calculations which assumed a payout at target.

(3)	Non-CEO NEOs reflect the average “Summary Compensation Table” total compensation and average CAP for the following executives by year:

2023: Pratt, Keith; Hawkins, Philip; Malek, Gilda; Van Trease, Kristina

2022: Pratt, Keith; Hawkins, Philip; Craft, Melodie; Van Trease, Kristina

2021: Pratt, Keith; Hawkins, Philip; Lieffrig, John; Craft, Melodie

2020: Pratt, Keith; Hawkins, Philip; Craft, Melodie; Van Trease, Kristina

Most Important Performance Measures

In our assessment, the most important performance measures used to link CAP (as calculated in accordance with the SEC rules) to Company performance are listed in the table below. The role of each of these performance measures in our executive compensation program is discussed in

“Executive Compensation”

in this Proxy Statement.

Performance Measures

Pre-Tax

Income

Adjusted EBITDA

Descriptions of the Information Presented in the Pay Versus Performance Table

The illustrations below compare CAP (as calculated in accordance with the SEC rules) and the following measures:

(1)

the Company’s cumulative TSR and the S&P 500 Industrials Index’s cumulative TSR;

(2)

the Company’s Net Income; and

(3)

the Company’s

Pre-Tax

Income

Due to the mechanics of how CAP is calculated, fluctuations in stock price or TSR may have a greater impact on the CAP values than any single financial metric.

Table of Contents

SEC Form DEF 14A filed by McGrath RentCorp