Document

DEF 14A 1 a2022def14a.htm DEF 14A Document

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

(Amendment No. __)

Filed by the Registrant ý Filed by a party other than the Registrant ¨

Check the appropriate box:


¨						Preliminary Proxy Statement
¨						Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
ý						Definitive Proxy Statement
¨						Definitive Additional Materials
¨						Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12

Noodles & Company

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)


Payment of Filing Fee (Check all boxes that apply):
ý						No fee required.
¨						Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
¨						Fee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11

March 29, 2022

To Our Stockholders:

You are cordially invited to attend the 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Noodles & Company at the offices of the Company at 520 Zang Street, Suite D, Broomfield, Colorado, on May 10, 2022, at 1:00 p.m. local time.

The matters expected to be acted upon at the meeting are described in detail in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy Statement.

Your vote is important. Please cast your vote as soon as possible over the Internet, by telephone, or, if you received a paper copy of the proxy materials by completing and returning the enclosed proxy card in the postage-prepaid envelope so that your shares are represented. Your vote will mean that you are represented at the Annual Meeting regardless of whether or not you attend in person. Returning the proxy does not deprive you of your right to attend the meeting and to vote your shares in person.

We look forward to seeing you at the meeting.

Sincerely,

Dave Boennighausen

Chief Executive Officer

NOODLES & COMPANY

520 ZANG STREET, SUITE D

BROOMFIELD, COLORADO 80021

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

To Our Stockholders:

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Noodles & Company (the “Company”) will be held at the offices of the Company at 520 Zang Street, Suite D, Broomfield, Colorado, on May 10, 2022, at 1:00 p.m. local time, for the following purposes:

1.To elect the two directors named in the Proxy Statement as Class III directors of the Company, each to serve for three years and until his or her successor has been elected and qualified, or until his or her earlier death, resignation or removal.

2.To approve, on an advisory (non-binding) basis, the compensation of our named executive officers.

3.To ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending January 3, 2023.

4.To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.

The foregoing items of business are more fully described in the Proxy Statement accompanying this Notice.

Only stockholders of record at the close of business on March 16, 2022 are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof. We expect to mail a notice of Internet availability of proxy materials (the “Notice”) or a copy of our proxy materials to the extent requested to our stockholders on or about March 29, 2022. The Notice contains instructions on how to access our proxy materials over the Internet and how to vote by going to a secure website. If you did not receive such a Notice, you may elect to receive future notices, proxy materials and annual reports electronically through the Internet by following the instructions in this Proxy Statement.

By Order of the Board of Directors

Melissa Heidman,

Executive Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary

Broomfield, Colorado

March 29, 2022

Whether or not you expect to attend the meeting, please vote via the Internet, by telephone, or, if you received a paper copy of the proxy materials, by completing, dating, signing and promptly returning the accompanying proxy card in the enclosed postage-paid envelope so that your shares may be represented at the meeting.

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR

THE STOCKHOLDER MEETING TO BE HELD ON MAY 10, 2022:

THIS PROXY STATEMENT AND THE ANNUAL REPORT ARE AVAILABLE AT

www.proxypush.com/NDLS

Noodles & Company

Proxy Statement

For the Annual Meeting of Stockholders

To Be Held on May 10, 2022

TABLE OF CONTENTS


			Page
The Meeting			1
Proposal No. 1—Election of Directors			4
Proposal No. 2—Advisory Vote to Approve the Compensation of Our Named Executive Officers			15
Proposal No.3—Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for the Year Ending January 3, 2023			16
Equity Compensation Plan Information			17
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management			18
Executive Officers			21
Compensation Discussion and Analysis			23
Compensation Committee Report			36
Executive Compensation			37
Director Compensation			45
Transactions with Related Persons			46
Report of the Audit Committee			47
Stockholder Proposals			48
Directors’ Attendance at Annual Stockholder Meetings			48
Stockholder Communications			48
Other Business			48
Where You Can Find More Information			48

NOODLES & COMPANY

520 ZANG STREET, SUITE D, BROOMFIELD, COLORADO 80021

PROXY STATEMENT

March 29, 2022

THE MEETING

The accompanying proxy is solicited on behalf of the Board of Directors (the “Board of Directors” or the “Board”) of Noodles & Company, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), for use at the 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) to be held at the offices of the Company at 520 Zang Street, Suite D, Broomfield, Colorado, on May 10, 2022, at 1:00 p.m. local time. The Notice, the Proxy Statement, the form of proxy and the Annual Report were first made available to stockholders on or about March 29, 2022. Electronic copies of this Proxy Statement, form of proxy and Annual Report are available at investor.noodles.com and www.proxypush.com/NDLS.

Voting Rights, Quorum and Required Vote

Only holders of record of our Class A and Class B common stock (“common stock”) at the close of business on March 16, 2022, which is the record date, will be entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. At the close of business on March 16, 2022, we had 45,705,041 shares of Class A common stock outstanding and entitled to vote. There are currently no shares of Class B common stock outstanding and none were outstanding on the record date. Each share of Class A and Class B common stock is entitled to one vote per share on each item. A quorum is required for our stockholders to conduct business at the Annual Meeting. The holders of a majority in voting power of all issued and outstanding stock entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting, present in person or represented by proxy, will constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. Abstentions and “broker non-votes” (described below) will be counted in determining whether there is a quorum.

Proposal No. 1—Election of Directors—directors will be elected by a plurality of the votes of the shares of common stock cast at the Annual Meeting, which means that the two nominees receiving the highest number of “for” votes will be elected. Withheld votes and broker non-votes (as defined below) will have no effect on this Proposal No. 1.

Proposal No. 2—Approval, on an Advisory (Non-Binding) Basis, of our Named Executive Officers’ Compensation—requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority in voting power of the stock entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting, present in person or represented by proxy. Abstentions will count the same as votes against Proposal No. 2. Broker non-votes will have no effect on this Proposal No. 2.

Proposal No. 3—Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for the Year Ending January 3, 2023—requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority in voting power of the stock entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting, present in person or represented by proxy. Abstentions will count the same as votes against this Proposal No. 3. Since this is a “routine” proposal, there should be no broker non-votes with respect to this Proposal No. 3.

Internet Availability of Proxy Materials

We have adopted a procedure approved by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) that permits companies to furnish their proxy materials over the Internet. As a result, we are mailing the Notice instead of a paper copy of the proxy materials. All stockholders receiving the Notice will have the ability to access the proxy materials over the Internet and may request to receive a paper copy of the proxy materials by mail. Instructions on how to access the proxy materials over the Internet or to request a paper copy may be found in the Notice. In addition, the Notice contains information on how you may request access to proxy materials in printed form by mail or electronically.

Voting Your Shares

If you are a registered holder, meaning that you hold our stock directly (not through a bank, broker or other nominee), you may vote in person at the Annual Meeting, via telephone, electronically through the Internet by following the instructions included in the Notice or the proxy card, as applicable, or, if you receive a paper copy of the proxy materials, by completing, dating and signing the accompanying proxy card and promptly returning it in the enclosed envelope. All signed, returned proxies that are not revoked will be voted in accordance with the instructions contained therein. Signed proxies that give no instructions as to how they should be voted on a particular proposal at the Annual Meeting will be counted in accordance with the Board’s recommendations as follows: as votes “for” Proposal No. 2 and Proposal No. 3 and, in the case of the election of the Class III directors, as a vote “for” election to Class III of the Board of each of the nominees presented by the Board in Proposal No. 1. Proxies will vote in their discretion upon other matters that may properly come before the Annual Meeting and any adjournments or postponements thereof.

If your shares are held through a bank, broker or other nominee, you are considered the beneficial owner of those shares. You may be able to vote by telephone or electronically through the Internet in accordance with the voting instructions provided by that nominee, such as through a voting instruction card. You must obtain a legal proxy from the nominee that holds your shares if you wish to vote in person at the Annual Meeting. If you do not provide your broker with a properly executed voting instructions form in advance of the Annual Meeting, New York Stock Exchange rules allow, but do not require, your broker to vote your shares on “routine” proposals. The ratification of the appointment of the independent registered public accounting firm in Proposal No. 3 is the only item on the agenda for the Annual Meeting that is considered routine. Where a proposal is not “routine,” a broker who has received no properly executed voting instructions form from its clients does not have discretion to vote its clients’ uninstructed shares on that proposal, and the unvoted shares are referred to as “broker non-votes.” We urge you to promptly provide voting instructions to your broker to ensure that your shares are voted on all of the proposals, even if you plan to attend the annual meeting.

In the event that sufficient votes in favor of the proposals are not received by the date of the Annual Meeting, the Chairman of the Annual Meeting may adjourn the Annual Meeting to permit further solicitations of proxies.

The telephone and Internet voting procedures are designed to authenticate stockholders’ identities, to allow stockholders to give their voting instructions and to confirm that stockholders’ instructions have been recorded properly. Stockholders voting via the telephone or Internet should understand that there may be costs associated with telephonic or electronic access, such as usage charges from telephone companies and Internet access providers, that must be borne by the stockholder.

Expenses of Solicitation

The expenses of soliciting proxies to be voted at the Annual Meeting will be paid by the Company. Following the original mailing of the Notice, proxies and other soliciting materials, the Company and/or its agents may also solicit proxies in person, by telephone or email. Following the original mailing of the Notice, proxies and other soliciting materials, the Company will request that banks, brokers and other nominees forward copies of the Notice to persons for whom they hold shares of common stock and request authority for the exercise of proxies. We will reimburse banks, brokers and other nominees for reasonable charges and expenses incurred in forwarding soliciting materials to their clients.

Revocability of Proxies

Any person submitting a proxy in the form accompanying this Proxy Statement (be it a proxy card or Notice) has the power to revoke it prior to the Annual Meeting or at the Annual Meeting prior to the vote. A proxy may be revoked by a writing delivered to the Company stating that the proxy is revoked by a subsequent vote or proxy that is submitted via telephone or Internet, by a subsequent proxy that is signed by the person who signed the earlier proxy and is delivered before or at the Annual Meeting, or by attendance at the Annual Meeting and voting in person. In order for beneficial owners to change any of your previously provided voting instructions, you must contact your bank, broker or other nominee directly.

Delivery of Documents to Stockholders Sharing an Address

We have adopted a procedure approved by the SEC called “householding” under which multiple stockholders who share the same address will receive only one copy of the Notice, the Annual Report, the Proxy Statement, and the proxy card, unless we receive contrary instructions from one or more of the stockholders. If you wish to opt out of householding and receive multiple copies of the Notice at the same address, or if you have previously opted out and wish to participate in householding, you may do so by notifying us by telephone at 720-214-4132, by mail at Noodles & Company at, 520 Zang Street, Suite D, Broomfield, CO 80021, or by email at investorrelations@noodles.com, and we will promptly deliver the requested materials.

You also may request additional copies of the proxy materials by notifying us in writing or by telephone at the same address, email address, or telephone number. Brokerage firms and banks are also entitled to household. Stockholders with shares registered in the name of a brokerage firm or bank should contact their brokerage firm or bank to request information about householding or to opt in or out of householding.

On or about March 29, 2022, we began to mail or email our stockholders the Notice or proxy card. If you receive the Notice and would prefer to receive paper copies of the proxy materials on a going forward basis, please follow the instructions in the Notice (or the voting instructions card provided by your brokerage firm or bank).

PROPOSAL NO. 1—ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

The Board of Directors is presently comprised of seven members, who are divided into three classes, Class I, Class II and Class III. One class of directors is elected by the stockholders at each annual meeting to serve a three-year term.

Each of the nominees for election to Class III is currently a director of the Company. Mr. Boennighausen and Ms. Schreiber were previously elected by stockholders at the 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. If elected at the Annual Meeting, each of the nominees would serve for three years expiring at the 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified, or until such director’s earlier death, resignation or removal. Proxies cannot be voted for a greater number of persons than the number of nominees named. If any of the nominees is unable or unwilling to be a candidate for election by the time of the Annual Meeting (a contingency which the Board does not expect to occur), the stockholders may vote for a substitute nominee chosen by the present Board to fill the vacancy. In the alternative, the stockholders may vote for just the remaining nominees, leaving a vacancy that may be filled at a later date by the Board, or the Board may reduce the size of the Board. Messrs. Jones, Madsen and Taylor were last elected by stockholders at the 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, and Ms. Egan and Mr. Hartnett were last elected by stockholders at the 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

The names of the nominees for election as Class III directors at the Annual Meeting and of the incumbent Class II and Class I directors, and certain information about them, including their ages, as of March 29, 2022, are included below.


	Class	Age	Position	Year Elected Director	Current Term Expires	Expiration of Term for which Nominated
Nominees
Dave Boennighausen	III	44	Chief Executive Officer and Director	2015	2022	2025
Elisa Schreiber (2)(4)	III	43	Director	2019	2022	2025

Continuing Directors
Mary Egan (1)(4)	I	54	Director	2017	2023
Robert Hartnett (1)(2)	I	70	Director	2016	2023
Jeffrey Jones (1)(2)(3)	II	60	Non-Executive Chairman	2013	2024
Drew Madsen (2)(4)	II	65	Director	2017	2024
Shawn Taylor (1)(4)	II	62	Director	2020	2024

________________________

(1)Serves on the Audit Committee.

(2)Serves on the Compensation Committee.

(3)Chairman of the Board of Directors.

(4)Serves on the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.

Below, we have provided biographies for each director and nominee summarizing his or her business and other experience, including the specific experience, qualifications, attributes or skills that led to the conclusion of the Board of Directors that such nominee should serve as a director in light of the Company’s business and structure.

Nominees for Election as Class III Directors

Dave Boennighausen has served as our CEO since June 2017 and as interim CEO from July 2016 through June 2017. He has been a member of our Board of Directors since August 2015. Mr. Boennighausen served as our CFO from July 2012 through his appointment as permanent CEO in June 2017. He has held various roles at the Company, including Vice President of Finance and Executive Vice President of Finance, since joining the Company in 2004. He began his career with May Department Stores. He holds an MBA from the Stanford Graduate School of Business and received a BS degree in Finance and Marketing from Truman State University. Mr. Boennighausen brings to our Board of Directors leadership skills, financial experience and strategic guidance.

Elisa Schreiber has been a member of our Board of Directors since December 2019. Since December 2014, Ms. Schreiber has served as the marketing partner at Greylock Partners, an early-stage venture capital firm headquartered in Silicon Valley, where she supports the firm’s portfolio companies with strategic marketing and communications counsel as they scale from seed stage to publicly-traded. From 2010 to 2013, Ms. Schreiber led the global communications team at Hulu, a premium entertainment streaming service, during a period of hyper-growth for the company. Ms. Schreiber is on the advisory board for All Raise, a non-profit dedicated to accelerating the success of female funders and founders in technology by improving the success of women in the venture-backed tech ecosystem. Ms. Schreiber earned her MBA from the University of Southern California Marshall School of Business, as well as her BA in Communications & Media Studies and her BA in Visual Arts at the University of California, San Diego. Ms. Schreiber brings extensive business experience in marketing and communications, with particular emphasis on emerging technologies, to our Board.

Continuing Directors

Mary Egan has been a member of our Board of Directors since September 2017. Ms. Egan founded and served as Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) of Gatheredtable, a consumer software as a service (“SAAS”) company offering customized meal planning, from 2013 until the technology platform was sold to a strategic buyer in 2018, at which time the position ceased to exist. From 2010 to 2012 Ms. Egan served as Head of Global Strategy and Corporate Development for Starbucks Corporation (Nasdaq: SBUX), a global coffee retailer. At Starbucks, Ms. Egan partnered with the senior leadership team to develop and execute corporate strategy, and led many successful strategic initiatives focusing on cost reduction, developing markets, digital and food. Ms. Egan was a Managing Director at The Boston Consulting Group (“BCG”), a global management consulting firm, from 1997 to 2010 where she partnered with CEO’s and boards of leading consumer brands to conceive and successfully drive aggressive growth strategies. While at BCG, she was a frequent global speaker on consumer-centric growth, and was featured in many news outlets, including The Wall Street Journal and The New York Times. Ms. Egan also serves on the Board of Directors of American Campus Communities (NYSE:ACC) where she serves on the strategic planning committee. Ms. Egan holds a BA from Barnard College, Columbia University, an MSEd from Bank Street Graduate School of Education and an MBA from Columbia Business School. Ms. Egan brings to our Board a broad range of experience in consumer-centric growth strategy and execution, as well as marketing and brand expertise.

Robert Hartnett has been a member of our Board of Directors since July 2016. He has over 40 years of restaurant industry experience. Most recently he served as CEO for Houlihan’s Restaurants, Inc. (“Houlihan’s”), a national operator and franchisor of fine dining and casual dining restaurants, a position that he held from 2001 until successfully negotiating the sale of that company in 2015. During his tenure at Houlihan’s, Mr. Hartnett successfully re-invented and revitalized the Houlihan’s brand. Prior to joining Houlihan’s, Mr. Hartnett served as President, CEO and Chairman of Einstein Noah Restaurant Group Inc. (“Einstein’s”), a national operator and franchisor of fast casual bagel restaurants. In addition, he has owned and operated Einstein Bros. and Boston Market franchise restaurants and has served as President of Bennigan’s Restaurants, a multi-unit casual dining operator. Mr. Hartnett holds a BA in Accounting from Lamar University. Mr. Hartnett brings to our Board of Directors broad experience in restaurant operations and restaurant brand development.

Jeffrey Jones has been a member of our Board of Directors since September 2013 and he has served as Non-Executive Chairman since September 2019. Prior to becoming Non-Executive Chairman, Mr. Jones served as our lead independent director. From 2003 to 2012, when he retired, Mr. Jones served as the Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) for Vail Resorts, Inc. (NYSE: MTN), a publicly held resort management company, and also served as a member of the board of directors of Vail Resorts, Inc. from 2008 through 2012. In addition, later in his tenure at Vail Resorts, Inc., Mr. Jones served as President - Lodging, Retail and Real Estate. Mr. Jones is currently a member of the board of directors of Hershey Entertainment and Resorts, a privately held company, where he is the lead independent director and is the chair of the audit and finance

committee and is a member of the compensation committee, Summit Hotel Properties, Inc. (NYSE:INN), where he is the non-executive board chairman, chair of the audit committee and a member of the compensation committee, and ClubCorp, a privately held company. He is also a member of the US Bank Advisory Board. Prior to joining Vail Resorts, Mr. Jones held CFO positions with Clark Retail Enterprises and Lids Corporation. Mr. Jones received a BA in Accounting and American Studies from Mercyhurst University (f/k/a Mercyhurst College) and is a member of the AICPA. Mr. Jones brings to our Board of Directors significant board leadership and public and private company experience including overall leadership and audit committee experience. Additionally, his board experience includes significant audit committee roles.

Drew Madsen has been a member of our Board of Directors since September 2017. From May 2015 to December 2016, when he resigned, Mr. Madsen served as President of Panera Bread Company, a national operator and franchisor of fast casual bakery cafés, where he helped guide the brand to industry leadership positions in clean food, digital ordering/payment and delivery. From October 2014 to March 2015, Mr. Madsen was President and Chief Operating Officer of the Norwegian Cruise Line division of Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. From 2005 to 2013 he was President and Chief Operating Officer, and a member of the board of directors, of Darden Restaurants, Inc. Mr. Madsen began his career at General Mills with various positions in brand management including serving as Vice President of Marketing. He holds an MBA with Distinction from the University of Michigan and earned a bachelor’s degree, magna cum laude, from DePauw University, where he was a member of the Phi Beta Kappa Society. Mr. Madsen brings to our Board significant experience in restaurant operations and brand management.

Shawn Taylor has been a member of our Board of Directors since December 2020. From 2013 to 2019, when he sold his franchise operations, Mr. Taylor was President and Operating Partner of Zaxby’s Houston, LLC, a franchisee of the Zaxby’s restaurant chain. In 2011, Mr. Taylor joined a group of business leaders who formed the Houston Baseball Partners, LLC, which led to the acquisition of the Houston Astros. He sold his interest in the Astros in 2017, but has remained as an advisor. In 1996 he founded and served as general partner, president, and CEO of Family EATS L.P., the Taco Bell franchisee in Houston, Texas. During his tenure, he owned, developed, and operated 33 Taco Bell locations, which he successfully sold in 2007. He is on the board of Memorial Hermann Healthcare System in Houston, Texas. Mr. Taylor started his career as a senior staff auditor at Arthur Andersen & Co., LLP in Dallas, Texas. Mr. Taylor received his B.S. degree in accounting, with distinction, from Purdue University in 1982. Mr. Taylor brings to our board significant experience in leadership of restaurant development and operations, as well as experience with franchise systems.


The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the election of each of the Class III director nominees listed above.

Directors and Corporate Governance

Board Composition, Qualifications and Diversity

Our Board of Directors currently consists of seven members. The Company has focused on increasing the diversity, both within its management team as well as on the Board of Directors and has made great progress towards this goal. Two of the seven directors who currently hold Board seats are women, and we added a racially diverse director with the addition of Mr. Taylor to the Board in December of 2020.

In accordance with the amended and restated certificate of incorporation and the amended and restated bylaws, our Board of Directors is divided into three classes with staggered three-year terms. The authorized number of directors may be changed pursuant to the Company’s bylaws by resolution of the Board of Directors. Our directors are divided among the three classes as follows:

•Current Class I directors are Mary Egan and Robert Hartnett, whose terms will expire at the 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

•Current Class II directors are Jeffrey Jones, Drew Madsen and Shawn Taylor, whose terms will expire at the 2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

•Current Class III directors are Dave Boennighausen and Elisa Schreiber, whose terms will expire at the this Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Directors for a particular class will be elected for three-year terms at the annual meeting of stockholders in the year in which their term expires. As a result, only one class of directors will be elected at each annual meeting of our stockholders, with the other classes continuing for the remainder of their respective three-year terms. Each director’s term continues until the election and qualification of his or her successor, or his or her earlier death, resignation or removal.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board believe that candidates for director should have certain minimum qualifications, including, without limitation:

• demonstrated business acumen and leadership, and high levels of accomplishment;

•ability to exercise sound business judgment and to provide insight and practical wisdom based on experience;

•commitment to understand the Company and its business, industry and strategic objectives;

•integrity and adherence to high personal ethics and values, consistent with our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics;

•ability to read and understand financial statements and other financial information pertaining to the Company;

•commitment to enhancing stockholder value;

•willingness to act in the interest of all stockholders;

•for non-employee directors, independence under Nasdaq listing standards and other applicable rules and regulations; and

•diversity of backgrounds, skills, experiences, and characteristics, including with respect to gender, race and ethnicity that help us to reflect the diversity of the Company’s shareholders, team members, guests and the communities we serve.

In the context of the Board’s existing composition, other requirements, such as restaurant industry experience or experience in a particular business discipline, that are expected to contribute to the Board’s overall effectiveness and meet the needs of the Board and its committees may be considered. The Company values diversity on a company-wide basis and seeks to achieve diversity of occupational and professional backgrounds on the Board, including on the basis of gender, race and ethnicity. Two of the seven directors who currently hold Board seats are women, and the Company added another diverse director with the addition of Mr. Taylor to the Board in December of 2020. We assess qualifications of our directors as part of the Board’s annual self-evaluation process.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee consults with other members of the Board of Directors and with the Company’s management in identifying and evaluating candidates for director who have the skills and characteristics that align with the Company’s priorities. As part of this process, the Committee considers the skills, experience and diversity of the current Board and assesses how potential candidates will complement and add to those attributes. See below the Company’s diversity matrix.


Board Diversity Matrix (As of March 29, 2022)
Total Number of Directors	7
	Female	Male	Non-Binary	Did Not Disclose Gender
Part I: Gender Identity
Directors	2	5	0	0
Part II: Demographic Background
African American or Black	0	1	0	0
Alaskan Native or Native American	0	0	0	0
Asian	0	0	0	0
Hispanic or Latinx	0	0	0	0
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander	0	0	0	0
White	2	4	0	0
Two or More Races or Ethnic	0	0	0	0
LGBTQ+	0
Did Not Disclose Demographic Background	0

Board Independence

Under Nasdaq’s listing requirements and Nasdaq rules, independent directors must comprise a majority of a listed company’s Board of Directors. Our Principles of Corporate Governance (the “Principles”) provide that an “independent” director is a director who meets the Nasdaq definition of independence, as determined by the Board of Directors, and the Principles also provide that, under applicable Nasdaq rules, the members of each of the Audit and Compensation Committees must meet additional, heightened independence criteria applicable to directors serving on these committees under applicable Nasdaq listing standards. Our Board of Directors has undertaken a review of its composition, the composition of its committees and the independence of each director (both generally, and, where applicable, under heightened independence criteria applicable to certain committees). Based upon information requested from and provided by each director concerning his or her background, employment and affiliations, including family relationships, our Board of Directors has determined, based on the recommendation of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, that each of Messrs. Hartnett, Jones, Madsen and Taylor, Ms. Egan and Ms. Schreiber were “independent” under Nasdaq rules. In making the independence determinations, our Board of Directors assessed the current and prior relationships of each non-employee director and all other relevant facts and circumstances. Based on these assessments, for each director deemed to be independent, our Board of Directors made a determination that, because of the nature of the director’s relationships and/or the amounts involved, each director deemed to be independent had no relationships with our company or our management that, in the judgment of the Board, would impair the director’s independence.

Leadership Structure

The Board does not have a policy regarding the separation of the roles of Chairman and CEO and believes that it is in the best interest of the Company and its stockholders for the Board periodically to evaluate and make a determination regarding whether or not to separate the roles of Chairman and CEO based upon the circumstances.

The Board has determined that separating the roles of Chairman and CEO is the most effective leadership structure for the Company at this time. The Board believes that the separation of Chairman and CEO duties allows Mr. Jones, who serves as

our Chairman, to better focus on active leadership of the Board, while allowing Mr. Boennighausen to better focus on day-to-day operations of the Company and corporate strategy. In addition, the Board believes that its leadership structure as described above provides an effective framework for addressing the risks facing our company, as discussed in greater detail below under “The Board’s Role in Risk Oversight.”

Among others, the Chairman’s duties and responsibilities include:

•presiding at meetings of the Board and stockholders;

•facilitating communication between the Board and the Company’s management;

•assisting the CEO in formulating long-term strategy;

•coordinating agendas and schedules for Board meetings, information flow to the Board and other matters pertinent to the Company and the Board;

•presiding at executive sessions of the independent directors; and

•being available for consultation and communication with major stockholders as appropriate.

Executive Sessions of Independent Directors

In order to promote open discussion among independent directors, our Board of Directors has a policy of conducting executive sessions of independent directors during each regularly scheduled Board meeting and at such other times as may be requested by an independent director. These executive sessions are chaired by our Chairman. Our Chairman provides feedback to our CEO, as needed, promptly after each executive session.

Principles of Corporate Governance

Our Principles of Corporate Governance are available on our website at investor.noodles.com/corporate-governance.cfm.

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to all of our officers and team members, including our CEO and CFO and those officers and team members responsible for financial reporting. We have also adopted a Director Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to our directors. Our codes of business conduct and ethics are posted on the investor relations section of our website at investor.noodles.com. We intend to disclose future amendments to our Codes of Business Conduct and Ethics, and any waivers of their provisions that we grant to our executive officers and directors, on our website within four business days following the date of the amendment or waiver.

Anti-Hedging Policy

The Company’s Insider Trading Policy provides that directors, officers and team members of the Company may not engage in the following with regard to equity securities of the Company held, directly or indirectly, by such persons or granted to such persons as part of his or her compensation: (a) short-term trading (generally defined as selling Company securities within six months following a purchase); (b) short sales (selling Company securities the seller does not own); (c) transactions involving publicly traded options or other derivatives, such as trading in puts or calls in Company securities; or (d) hedging transactions. The foregoing restrictions also apply to immediate family members of directors, officers and team members, which consist of any child, stepchild, parent, stepparent, spouse, sibling, mother-in-law, father-in-law, son-in-law, daughter-in-law, brother-in-law, or sister-in-law and any person (other than a tenant or employee) sharing the household of the director, officer or team member.

Anti-Pledging Policy

The Company’s Insider Trading Policy provides that our directors, officers and team members, as well as certain related parties, are prohibited from entering into pledging transactions or similar arrangements with respect to Company securities.

Board Meetings

During 2021, the Board of Directors held five meetings. Additionally, management frequently communicated with the Board throughout the year on various topics. Each of our directors attended 100% of the aggregate of the total number of meetings

of the Board of Directors held during the period in 2021 that such director served and the total number of meetings held by any of the committees of the Board of Directors on which such director served during such period.

The Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

The Board of Directors oversees the Company’s risk management process. The Board oversees a Company-wide approach to risk management, designed to enhance stockholder value, support the achievement of strategic objectives and improve long-term organizational performance. The Board determines the appropriate level of risk for the Company generally, assesses the specific risks faced by the Company and reviews the steps taken by management to manage those risks. The Board’s involvement in setting the Company’s business strategy facilitates these assessments and reviews, culminating in the development of a strategy that reflects both the Board’s and management’s consensus as to appropriate levels of risk and the appropriate measures to manage those risks. Pursuant to this structure, risk is assessed throughout the enterprise, focusing on risks arising out of various aspects of the Company’s strategy and the implementation of that strategy, including financial, legal/compliance, operational/strategic, health and safety, and compensation risks. The Board also considers risk when evaluating proposed transactions and other matters presented to the Board, including acquisitions and financial matters.

Management is responsible for assessing and managing risk, including through the Company’s Enterprise Risk Management (“ERM”) program, however the Board maintains the ultimate oversight responsibility for the risk management process. In particular, the Audit Committee oversees the ERM program, which provides a framework for risk identification and management. Risks are identified and prioritized by the ERM Committee, which is comprised of members of Executive Management as well as key Company leaders below the executive level. The ERM Committee provides periodic reports to the Audit Committee as well as to the Board. The Board believes that the ERM program supports the risk oversight function of the Board. The Audit Committee also focuses on financial risk, including internal controls, and discusses the Company’s risk profile with the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. In addition, the Audit Committee oversees the Company’s compliance program with respect to legal and regulatory requirements, including the Company’s codes of conduct and policies and procedures for monitoring compliance. The Audit Committee also receives regular reports on the Company’s cybersecurity compliance and risk management practices, including its compliance with the Payment Card Industry (PCI) Data Security Standard (DSS), its implementation of data security solutions and risk evaluation, and its insurance coverages. The Compensation Committee periodically reviews compensation practices and policies to determine whether they encourage excessive risk taking, including an annual review of management’s assessment of the risk associated with the Company’s compensation programs covering its team members, including executives, and discusses the concept of risk as it relates to the Company’s compensation programs. The Compensation Committee also oversees human capital programs including those which promote employee development and retention and which focus on workforce diversity and inclusion. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee oversees sustainability (including climate-change) and human capital management and social impact related risks through oversight of our Environmental, Social and Governance (“ESG”) program. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee oversaw the creation and development of our first ESG impact report issued in 2021. Management regularly reports on applicable risks to the relevant committee or the Board, as appropriate, including reports on significant Company projects, including but not limited to our ESG program and report. Additional review and reporting on risks are conducted as needed or as requested by the Board and its committees.

Board Committees

Audit Committee

Our Audit Committee, which met four times in 2021, is currently composed of Mary Egan, Robert Hartnett, Jeffrey Jones and Shawn Taylor, each of whom is a non-employee, independent member of our Board of Directors. Mr. Jones is the Chairman of the Audit Committee and our Audit Committee financial expert, as currently defined under SEC rules. Each member of the Audit Committee meets the requirements for financial literacy under the applicable Nasdaq rules. All of our Audit Committee members meet the additional, heightened independence criteria applicable to directors serving on the Audit Committee under Nasdaq rules and SEC rules.

The Audit Committee operates under a written charter, available on our website at investor.noodles.com/corporate-governance.cfm, that satisfies the applicable standards of the SEC and the listing requirements of Nasdaq, and oversees our corporate accounting and financial reporting process. The Audit Committee also oversees our ERM program. The Audit Committee conducts its activities in a manner designed to emphasize the importance of an environment that supports integrity in the financial reporting process.

The Audit Committee’s responsibilities include, but are not limited to:

•appointing, compensating, retaining and overseeing our independent registered public accounting firm and evaluating its performance;

•approving in advance all audit and permissible non-audit services to be provided by the outside auditor, and establishing policies and procedures for the pre-approval of audit and permissible non-audit services to be provided by the outside auditor;

•at least annually, considering the independence of the outside auditor and, consistent with rules of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”), obtaining and reviewing reports by the outside auditor describing any relationships between the outside auditor, and the Company or individuals in financial reporting oversight roles at the Company, that may reasonably be thought to bear on the outside auditor’s independence and discussing with the outside auditor the potential effects of any such relationships on independence;

•at least annually, obtaining and reviewing a report by the outside auditor describing, among other things, its internal quality-control procedures;

•meeting to review and discuss with management and the outside auditor the annual audited and quarterly financial statements of the Company and the independent auditor’s reports related to the financial statements;

•receiving reports from the outside auditor and management regarding, and reviewing and discussing the adequacy and effectiveness of, the Company’s internal controls, including any significant deficiencies in internal controls and significant changes in internal controls reported to the Audit Committee by the outside auditor or management;

•receiving reports from management regarding, and reviewing and discussing the adequacy and effectiveness of, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures;

•reviewing and discussing earnings press releases, and corporate practices with respect to earnings press releases and financial information and earnings guidance provided to analysts and ratings agencies;

•overseeing the Company’s compliance program with respect to legal and regulatory requirements, including the Company’s Codes of Business Conduct and Ethics and the Company’s policies and procedures for monitoring compliance;

•reviewing and discussing the Company’s practices with respect to risk assessment and risk management;

•establishing and overseeing procedures for handling reports of potential misconduct; and

•establishing and periodically reviewing policies and procedures for the review, approval and ratification of related party transactions.

Compensation Committee

Our Compensation Committee, which met five times in 2021, is currently composed of Robert Hartnett, Jeffrey Jones, Drew Madsen and Elisa Schreiber, each of whom is a non-employee, independent member of our Board of Directors. Mr. Hartnett serves as Chairman of the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee operates under a written charter, available on our website at investor.noodles.com/corporate-governance.cfm, that satisfies the applicable standards of the SEC and Nasdaq. The Compensation Committee’s responsibilities include, but are not limited to:

•overseeing the Company’s overall compensation philosophy, policies and programs, and assessing whether the Company’s compensation philosophy establishes appropriate incentives for management and team members;

•reviewing and approving corporate goals and objectives relevant to the compensation of the CEO, evaluating the CEO’s performance in light of those goals and objectives and, upon submitting such goals and performance evaluation to the independent directors of the Board meeting in executive session for consideration, set the CEO’s compensation level based on this evaluation, and approve the grant of equity awards to the CEO;

•setting the compensation of other executive officers based upon the recommendation of the CEO and approve the terms and grant of equity awards for such other executive officers;

•administering and making recommendations to the Board with respect to the Company’s incentive compensation and equity-based compensation plans that are subject to Board approval;

•approving the terms and grant of equity awards for executive officers;

•reviewing and approving the design of other benefit plans pertaining to executive officers;

•approving, and amending or modifying, the terms of other compensation and benefit plans as appropriate;

•reviewing and recommending to the Board any employment and severance arrangements for executive officers, including employment agreements and change-in-control provisions, plans or agreements;

•annually reviewing the compensation of directors for service on the Board and its committees and recommending changes in compensation to the Board as appropriate;

•overseeing the Company’s engagement efforts with shareholders on the subject of

executive compensation;

•overseeing the assessment of risks related to the Company’s compensation policies and programs applicable to officers and team members, and review the results of this assessment;

•annually conducting an assessment of any potential conflicts of interest required to be disclosed and raised by the work of any compensation consultants; and

•overseeing the Company’s human capital programs, including with respect to employee development and retention and workforce diversity and inclusion.

Pursuant to the terms of its charter, the Compensation Committee may delegate its duties and responsibilities to one or more subcommittees, consisting of not less than two members of the Committee.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

None of the members of our Compensation Committee is, or has at any time been, an officer or employee of the Company. None of our executive officers currently serves, or in the past year has served, as a member of the Board of Directors or Compensation Committee of any other entity that has one or more executive officers serving on our Board of Directors or Compensation Committee. No directors served on the Compensation Committee in 2021 other than Messrs. Hartnett, Jones and Madsen and Ms. Schreiber.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, which met five times in 2021, is currently composed of Mary Egan, Drew Madsen, Elisa Schreiber and Shawn Taylor, each of whom is a non-employee, independent member of our Board of Directors. Ms. Egan serves as Chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee operates under a written charter, available on our website at investor.noodles.com/corporate-governance.cfm, that satisfies the applicable standards of the SEC and Nasdaq. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s responsibilities include, but are not limited to:

•developing and recommending to the Board criteria for identifying and evaluating director candidates and periodically review these criteria;

•assessing the contributions and independence of incumbent directors in determining whether to recommend them for re-election;

•identifying, reviewing the qualifications of and recruiting candidates for election to the Board;

•establishing procedures for the consideration of Board candidates recommended for the Committee’s consideration by the Company’s stockholders;

•recommending to the Board the Company’s candidates for election or re-election to the Board at each annual stockholders’ meeting;

•recommending to the Board candidates to be elected by the Board as necessary to fill vacancies and newly created directorships;

•developing and recommending to the Board a set of corporate governance principles, and annually reviewing those principles and recommending changes to the Board as appropriate;

•reviewing directorships at other organizations offered to directors and senior officers of the Company and referring any opportunities that may raise conflicts of interest or other governance concerns to the Board for further discussion, as appropriate;

•overseeing succession planning process and facilitating discussions with the Board;

•overseeing the Company’s ESG program and strategies;

•making recommendations to the Board concerning the size, structure, composition and functioning of the Board and its committees; and

•recommending committee members and chairpersons to the Board for appointment.

Policy Regarding Stockholder Recommendations

The Company identifies new director candidates through a variety of sources. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider director candidates recommended by stockholders in the same manner it considers other candidates, as described below. Stockholders seeking to recommend candidates for consideration by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee should submit a recommendation in writing describing the candidate’s qualifications and other relevant biographical information and provide confirmation of the candidate’s consent to serve as director. Please submit this information to the Corporate Secretary, Noodles & Company, 520 Zang Street, Suite D, Broomfield, CO 80021, or by email at investorrelations@noodles.com.

Stockholders may also propose director nominees by adhering to the advance notice procedure described under “Stockholder Proposals” elsewhere in this Proxy Statement.

Environmental, Social and Human Capital Highlights

People and Benefits

We believe the strength of our workforce is one of the significant contributors to our success as a brand. This is largely attributed to our team members who strive every day to create an inclusive environment for our guests where they feel welcomed and cared for. Therefore, one of our strategic priorities is to develop people as a differentiator, including investing in the areas of focus discussed below.

We recognize the diversity of our guests, team members and communities, and believe in creating an inclusive and equitable environment that represents a broad spectrum of backgrounds and cultures. Working under these principles, our Human Resources department is tasked with managing employment-related matters, including recruiting and hiring, onboarding and training, compensation and benefit planning, performance management and talent development. Our management and cross-functional teams also work closely to evaluate human capital management issues such as team member retention, workplace safety, harassment and bullying, as well as to implement measures to mitigate these risks.

Our Board of Directors and Board committees provide oversight on certain human capital matters as part of their overall engagement in our ESG practices. Our Compensation Committee, with input from members of our management, has responsibility for administering and approving annually certain elements of compensation, including our incentive compensation plans and equity-based plans. Management provides input into the design of our incentive compensation programs to ensure that these programs support the Company’s business objectives and strategic priorities. The annual business plan initially established by our management, but approved by our Board, is an important element of our Compensation Committee’s decision-making process for performance measures and goals.

We have demonstrated a history of investing in our workforce by offering competitive salaries and wages. To foster a stronger sense of ownership and align the interests of our team members with shareholders, restricted stock units are provided to eligible team members under our stock incentive programs which we recently expanded to include eligible members of our

field and restaurant teams. Additionally, we provide incentive compensation through annual bonus plans for all eligible team members. Furthermore, we offer comprehensive, targeted and innovative benefits to all eligible team members. This includes comprehensive health, dental and vision insurance coverage, a 401(k) program and paid time off.

We continue to innovate and expand our already comprehensive team member benefits program called LifeAtNoodles introducing new benefits which include education, wellness, family planning, expanded time off and recognition initiatives for all team members.

•Mental Health. Our new benefits prioritize mental health by offering free in-person and virtual counseling for all team members. We also offer mental health awareness live webinars, focusing on identifying mental health symptoms, and supporting individuals with mental health issues to ensure all team members are supported.

•Family Planning. We also support our team members’ families by offering six weeks of paid maternity leave, six weeks of paid paternity leave and surrogacy and adoption assistance for qualifying team members of up to $10,000. This is in addition to our exceptional phase-in and phase-out maternity leave which includes 100% pay for a reduced schedule during the four weeks before and after the arrival of a child.

•Tuition. We offer limited tuition reimbursement for our General Managers and tuition assistance through an online educational partner for all team members and their immediate family to help families meet their educational goals and career aspirations.

We are continually focused on how we can offer the best workplace in our industry and we are proud of these new benefits that honor our commitment to inclusion and diversity. As of December 28, 2021, we had approximately 8,000 employees, including approximately 600 salaried employees and approximately 7,400 hourly employees. None of our employees are unionized or covered by a collective bargaining agreement, and we consider our current employee relations to be good.

We are committed to creating a diverse and inclusive culture and have furthered these efforts by establishing an Inclusion and Diversity Council comprised of our team members and members of our executive team. In addition, we have recently created two new employee-led employee resource groups which will provide our employees with a voice and an ability to effect change with regard to matters affecting the affinity groups.

We also have strong female leadership across all areas of our Company including:

•50% of our executive team;

•56% of our operations team; and

•53% of our central support office.

Environment and Community

In October of 2021, we released our first Nourish & Inspire ESG impact report detailing the progress we have made across four important areas of our business: food, people, planet, and community. We continue to focus on innovation within our supply chain and our restaurants in order to reduce our impact and our footprint.

We support the communities we serve through fundraising nights in our restaurants, participation in community events and involvement in national fundraising efforts. For example:

•in 2021 we partnered with No Kid Hungry to provide meals to children in need;

•in 2021 we partnered with Out and Equal to raise funds to support the LGBTQ+ communities; and

•we hosted fundraising events throughout 2021 in our restaurants to raise funds for our local communities.

Suppliers

Maintaining a high degree of quality in our restaurants depends in part on our ability to acquire fresh ingredients and other necessary supplies that meet our specifications from reliable suppliers. We carefully select suppliers based on quality and their understanding of our brand, and we seek to develop mutually beneficial long-term relationships with them. We support a variety of types of partners including small businesses and female and minority owned businesses.

PROPOSAL NO. 2—ADVISORY (NON-BINDING) VOTE TO APPROVE THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

We are providing our stockholders with the opportunity to vote, on an advisory basis, to approve the compensation of the named executive officers (“NEOs”) identified in this Proxy Statement.

Stockholders are urged to review the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” “Compensation Committee Report” and “Executive Compensation” sections of this Proxy Statement for more information.

We are asking our stockholders to indicate their support for our NEOs’ compensation by voting FOR the following resolution at the Annual Meeting:

“RESOLVED, that the Company’s stockholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Named Executive Officers, as disclosed in the Company’s proxy statement for the 2022 Annual Meeting pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (which disclosure includes the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the Summary Compensation Table and the other related tables and disclosure).”

This is a non-binding advisory vote and, therefore, its outcome does not mandate any particular action. However, our Board and our Compensation Committee will carefully consider the outcome of this vote when making future decisions regarding the compensation of our NEOs. In addition, we expect to hold our next advisory vote to approve the compensation of our named executive officers at the 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.


The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the approval, on an advisory (non-binding) basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers.

PROPOSAL NO. 3—RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT

REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR 2022

The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors has selected Ernst & Young LLP, or Ernst & Young, to be the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending January 3, 2023, and recommends that the stockholders vote for ratification of such appointment. Ernst & Young has been engaged as our independent registered public accounting firm since 2009. As a matter of good corporate governance, the Audit Committee has requested the Board of Directors submit the selection of Ernst & Young as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2022 to stockholders for ratification. In the event of a negative vote on such ratification, the Audit Committee will reconsider its selection but may nonetheless continue to retain Ernst & Young. Even if the selection Ernst & Young is ratified, the Audit Committee may select another auditor if it determines doing so to be in the best interests of the Company and shareholders. We expect representatives of Ernst & Young to be present at the Annual Meeting. They will have the opportunity to make a statement at the Annual Meeting if they desire to do so, and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.

Audit and Related Fees

The following table sets forth the aggregate fees for professional services rendered by Ernst & Young for the audit of our financial statements for 2021 and 2020.


	2021		2020
Audit fees (1)	$	757,500	$	747,000
Audit-related fees (2)	4,500		—
Tax fees (3)	19,818		65,000
All other fees (4)	1,200		—
Total fees	$	783,018	$	812,000

_____________________

(1)Audit fees include the aggregate fees billed for each of the last two fiscal years indicated for professional services rendered by Ernst & Young for the audit of our financial statements, audit of internal control over financial reporting, interim reviews, consents and other services related to SEC matters, and related out of pocket expenses, notwithstanding when the services were rendered.

(2)Audit-related fees include the aggregate fees billed for each of the last two fiscal years indicated for assurance and related services rendered by Ernst & Young that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements and are not reported under Audit fees.

(3)Tax fees include the aggregate fees billed for each of the last two fiscal years indicated for professional services and products provided by Ernst & Young for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning.

(4)All other fees include the aggregate fees billed for each of the last two fiscal years indicated for products and services provided by Ernst & Young, other than the services reported as Audit fees, Audit-related fees or Tax fees.

The Board of Directors adopted a written policy for the pre-approval of certain audit and non-audit services that Ernst & Young provides. The policy balances the need for independence of Ernst & Young while recognizing that in certain situations Ernst & Young may possess both the technical expertise and knowledge of the Company to best advise the Company on issues and matters in addition to accounting and auditing. In general, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm cannot be engaged to provide any audit or non-audit services unless the engagement is pre-approved by the Audit Committee. Certain services may also be pre-approved by the Chairman of the Audit Committee under the policy. All of the fees identified in the table above were approved in accordance with SEC requirements and pursuant to the policies and procedures described above.


The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the ratification of the appointment of ERNST & YOUNG LLP for the year ending January 3, 2023.

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

The following table summarizes information as of March 16, 2022, about shares of common stock that may be issued under our equity compensation plans.


Plan category	Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights (a)	Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options and warrants (b)		Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) (c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders (1)	2,532,337	$	12.26	2,731,120
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders	—	—		—
Total	2,532,337	$	12.26	2,731,120

______________________________

(1)Includes in column (a) 783,412 shares of Class A common stock issuable upon exercise of options outstanding under the Company’s Stock Incentive Plan and 1,748,925 gross number of shares of Class A common stock underlying outstanding restricted stock units (“RSUs”). The shares underlying the outstanding RSUs are not included in the calculation of the Weighted-Average Exercise Price in column (b). Includes in column (c) 2,208,011 shares of Class A common stock available for issuance upon exercise of future grants under the Company’s Stock Incentive Plan and 523,109 shares of Class A common stock available for future issuance under the Company’s Employee Stock Purchase Plan. Material features of the Company’s Stock Incentive Plan and Employee Stock Purchase Plan are set forth in Note 9, Stock-Based Compensation and Note 11, Employee Benefit Plans, to our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 28, 2021.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the beneficial ownership of Class A and Class B of our common stock as of February 18, 2022 (except where otherwise noted below) for:

•each stockholder known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5.0% of any class of our outstanding shares of common stock;

•each of our directors and director nominees;

•each of our named executive officers; and

•all of our directors and executive officers as a group.

We have determined beneficial ownership in accordance with the rules of the SEC. Except as indicated by the footnotes below, we believe, based on the information furnished to us, that the persons and entities named in the table below have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of our common stock that they beneficially own, subject to applicable community property laws.

Applicable percentage ownership in the following table is based on 45,705,041 shares of common stock outstanding as of February 18, 2022 (all of which were Class A common stock), unless otherwise indicated in the footnotes below. In computing the number of shares of common stock beneficially owned by a person or entity and the percentage ownership of that person or entity, we deemed to be outstanding all shares of common stock subject to options or other convertible securities held by that person or entity that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of February 18, 2022. Under the SEC rules, we did not deem these shares outstanding, however, for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person. Unless otherwise indicated, the address of each beneficial owner listed in the table below is c/o Noodles & Company, 520 Zang Street, Suite D, Broomfield, CO 80021.


	Shares of Common Stock Beneficially Owned
	Shares	Percent
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner

Stockholders owning more than 5%
Entities affiliated with FMR LLC (1)	6,853,422	15.0	%
Entities affiliated with Mill Road Capital (2)	4,721,534	10.3	%
Timothy M. Riley (3)	3,805,000	8.3	%
Woodson Capital Master Fund, LP (4)	3,500,000	7.7	%
BlackRock, Inc. (5)	2,511,218	5.5	%

Named Executive Officers and Directors
Dave Boennighausen (6)	372,798	*
Carl Lukach	5,580	*
Brad West (7)	81,164	*
Stacey Pool (8)	30,179	*
Melissa Heidman (9)	65,493	*
Mary Egan	29,652	*
Robert Hartnett	117,298	*
Jeffrey Jones (10)	70,071	*
Drew Madsen	29,652	*
Elisa Schreiber	17,860	*
Shawn Taylor	16,780	*

All Executive Officers and Directors as a Group (14) (11)	991,556	2.1	%

* Indicates ownership of less than one percent.

__________________________

(1)Based upon information set forth on Schedule 13G filed by FMR LLC (“FMR”) with the SEC on or about February 9, 2022. Fidelity Management & Research Company (“Fidelity”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of FMR and an investment adviser registered under Section 203 of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, is the beneficial owner of 6,853,422 shares of our common stock as a result of acting as investment adviser to various investment companies registered under Section 8 of the Investment Company Act of 1940. FMR also disclosed having sole voting power over 1,508,070 shares of our common stock. Abigail P. Johnson and FMR, through its control of Fidelity, and the funds each has sole power to dispose of the 6,853,422 shares owned by the funds. Members of the Johnson family, including Abigail P. Johnson, are the predominant owners, directly or through trusts, of Series B voting common shares of FMR representing 49% of the voting power of FMR. The Johnson family group and all other Series B shareholders have entered into a shareholders’ voting agreement under which all Series B voting common shares will be voted in accordance with the majority vote of Series B voting common shares. Accordingly, through their ownership of voting common shares and the execution of the shareholders’ voting agreement, members of the Johnson family may be deemed, under the Investment Company Act of 1940, to form a controlling group with respect to FMR. Neither FMR LLC nor Abigail P. Johnson has the sole power to vote or direct the voting of the shares owned directly by the various investment companies registered under the Investment Company Act ("Fidelity Funds") advised by Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC ("FMR Co. LLC"), a wholly owned subsidiary of FMR LLC, which power resides with the Fidelity Funds' Boards of Trustees. FMR Co. LLC carries out the voting of the shares under written guidelines established by the Fidelity Funds' Boards of Trustees. VIP Mid Cap Portfolio (“VIP”) further reported sole voting power over , and aggregate ownership of 2,926,551 shares of our common stock. The principal business address of the reporting persons is 245 Summer Street, Boston, MA 02210.

(2)Based on the information as of November 28, 2018 included in the most recently available Schedule 13D/A filed with the SEC on November 30, 2018 and a Form 4 filed with the SEC on October 18, 2021, which reflects the securities beneficially owned, or that may be deemed to be beneficially owned, by Mill Road Capital II, L.P. (the “Fund), Mill Road Capital II GP LLC (the “GP”) is the sole general partner of the Fund has sole authority to vote (or direct the vote of), and dispose (or direct the disposal) of, these shares on behalf of the Fund. Mr. Thomas E. Lynch is a management committee director of the GP. Each of Mill Road and Mill Road GP disclosed having sole voting power and sole dispositive power over 22,386 shares of our Class A common stock, and Mr. Lynch disclosed having shared voting power and shared dispositive power over 4,699,148 shares of our Class A common stock. Mr. Lynch disclaims beneficial ownership of such securities except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein. The principal business address of each such person is 382 Greenwich Avenue, Suite One, Greenwich, CT 06830.

(3)Based on the information as of December 31, 2021 included in the most recently available Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on January 5, 2022, which reflects the securities beneficially owned, or that may be deemed to be beneficially owned, by Timothy M. Riley and Angela A. Riley. Timothy M. Riley disclosed having sole voting and dispositive power over 2,950,000 shares and shared voting power over 50,000 and dispositive power over 155,000 shares. Ms. Angela A. Riley disclosed having sole voting power over 805,000 and sole dispositive power over 700,000 shares and shared voting power over 50,000 shares and shared dispositive power over 155,000 shares. The principal address of Timothy M. Riley and Angela A. Riley is P.O. Box 2113, Darien, CT 06820.

(4)Based on the information as of December 31, 2021 included in the most recently available Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 14, 2022 which reflects the securities beneficially owned, or that may be deemed to be beneficially owned, by Woodson Capital Master Fund, LP (“Woodson Master”), Woodson Capital General Partner, LLC, the general partner of Woodson Master (“Fund General Partner”), Woodson Capital Management, LP, the investment manager of Woodson Master (“Investment Manager”), Woodson Capital GP, LLC, the general partner of the Investment Manager (“Investment Manager General Partner”) and James Woodson Davis, the sole managing member of the Investment Manager General Partner (“Woodson”). Woodson Master disclosed having shared voting power and shared dispositive power over and aggregate ownership of 3,318,000 shares of our Class A common stock. Each of the Fund General Partner, the Investment Manager, the Investment Manager General Partner, and Woodson disclosed having shared voting power and shared dispositive power over 3,500,000 shares of our Class A common stock. The shares reported for Woodson Master are owned directly by it. Each of the Fund General Partner, the Investment Manager, the Investment Manager General Partner and Woodson may be deemed to be a beneficial owner of all such shares owned by Woodson Master. Each of the Fund General Partner, the Investment Manager, the Investment Manager General Partner and Woodson disclaims any beneficial ownership of any such shares. The principal address of Woodson Master is Maples Corporate Services Limited, Ugland House Grand Cayman, KY1-1104 Cayman Island. The principal address of all other reporting persons is 101 Park Avenue, 48th Floor, New York, NY 10178.

(5)Based on the information as if December 31, 2021 included in the most recently available Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 4, 2022, which reflects the securities beneficially owned, or that may be deemed to be beneficially owned, by BlackRock, Inc. (“BlackRock”). BlackRock disclosed having sole voting power over 2,493,816 shares and sole dispositive power 2,511,218 shares. The principal address of BlackRock is 55 East 52nd Street, New York, NY 10055.

(6)Includes options to purchase 259,708 shares of our Class A common stock which will be exercisable within 60 days of March 16, 2022.

(7)Includes options to purchase 36,966 shares of our Class A common stock which will be exercisable within 60 days of March 16, 2022.

(8)Includes options to purchase 8,417 shares of our Class A common stock which will be exercisable within 60 days of March 16, 2022.

(9)Includes options to purchase 42,249 shares of our Class A common stock which will be exercisable within 60 days of March 16, 2022.

(10)Includes options to purchase 14,117 shares of our Class A common stock which will be exercisable within 60 days of March 16, 2022.

(11)Includes options to purchase 456,690 shares of our Class A common stock which will be exercisable within 60 days of March 16, 2022.

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Executive Officer Composition and Diversity

The Company has focused on increasing diversity, both within its management team as well as on the Board of Directors, and has made great progress towards this goal. With respect to our management team, four of our executives are women and one of our executives is a member of the LGBTQ+ community.

Set forth below are our executive officers, including related biographical information.

Name

Age (1)

Position

Dave Boennighausen

Chief Executive Officer

Carl Lukach

Chief Financial Officer

Stacey Pool

Chief Marketing Officer

Brad West

Chief Operating Officer

Melissa Heidman

Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

Corey Kline

Executive Vice President, Technology

Kathy Lockhart

Chief Accounting Officer

Sue Petersen

Executive Vice President, Inclusion, Diversity and People

_____________

(1)As of March 16, 2022

Dave Boennighausen. Information regarding Dave Boennighausen is described above under “Continuing Directors.”

Carl Lukach has served as our Chief Financial Officer since November 2020. Prior to joining Noodles, Carl was the VP Finance at Equinox from September 2016 until November 2020. Equinox is the namesake brand within Equinox Group, a privately held high-growth collective of influential lifestyle and digital brands. In this role, he oversaw finance, treasury, tax, strategic planning and financial operations, in addition to investor management and capital fund raising. Prior to Equinox, he was Senior Director, Finance and Corporate Development for Abercrombie & Fitch (“A&F”) an American retailer focused on

casual wear, from September 2014 until September 2016. At A&F, he led the expansion of the A&F and Hollister brands through outlet growth and new venture initiatives, including franchising, licensing, wholesale, and acquisitions. Prior to A&F, Carl was an investment banker at Credit Suisse from July 2003 until June 2005, and again from March 2006 until September 2014. During his time at Credit Suisse, his industry focus was in food and retail businesses, and he was responsible for advising clients in capital fund raising and M&A transactions. Between his positions at Credit Suisse, he was an Associate at Bear Stearns in the equity research department. He holds a bachelor’s degree in finance and psychology from Georgetown University.

Stacey Pool has served as our Chief Marketing Officer since December 2019. Prior to joining the Company, Stacey held a variety of leadership roles at Vail Resorts, Inc., a publicly held resort management company, including Sr. Vice President of Season Pass Marketing, from April 2019 through November 2019, Chief of Staff to the CEO, from June 2018 through April 2019, and Vice President of Digital Experience, from October 2014 through June 2018. During her time at Vail Resorts, Ms. Pool was responsible for leading and executing marketing campaigns for the Epic Pass brand and delivering the strategic vision for the Vail Resorts digital experience. Her specific responsibilities as Sr. VP of Marketing included the development of the season pass marketing plan, understanding and influencing guest behavior in order to drive repeat visitation, and ongoing analysis of the season pass business. Additionally, during her time there, she was hired as the Chief of Staff to the CEO where she managed executive communication and deliverables for the most strategic company initiatives. Before joining Vail Resorts, Ms. Pool was at Nike, Inc., where she defined the vision and strategy for the NIKEiD.com digital experience. Prior to Nike, she worked in consulting at Accenture, where she supported both Verizon Wireless and Qwest Communications. Stacey holds a Bachelor of Science in Business Administration from the University of Arizona.

Brad West has served as our Chief Operating Officer since March 2021. Prior to that time he served as Executive Vice President of Operations from September 2017 to February 2021. Mr. West has an extensive background in leading and directing company and franchise operations, including training in the restaurant industry over the past 40 years. Prior to joining us, he served as Vice President, Operations of Smoothie King Franchises, Inc. from 2014 through August 2017, whose principal business was the sale of smoothies and retail merchandise including vitamins, minerals, protein powders and power bars. Prior to that role, he was Chief Operating Officer of ACG Pizza Partners LLC, and he had earlier spent 15 years at Einstein’s, most recently as Senior Vice President, Non-Traditional Business, where he was responsible for the operations, development and

growth of over 250 Einstein Bros. Bagels license locations. Mr. West also held key operational roles at CEC Entertainment, Inc., Applebee’s International, Inc. franchise groups and S&A Restaurant Corporation.

Melissa Heidman has served as Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary since June 2018. Prior to that time she served as Associate General Counsel from August 2011 to September 2015, as Vice President and Associate General Counsel from September of 2015 until December 2017 and as Vice President, Acting General Counsel and Secretary from December of 2017 until June 2018. Prior to joining Noodles & Company, Ms. Heidman was Special Counsel in the law firm of Berg Hill Greenleaf & Ruscitti. She began her legal career serving as a Law Clerk for the District Court of Iowa, the Iowa Supreme Court and, later, as Law Clerk and Staff Attorney for the Superior Court of Guam. Ms. Heidman received a BA in Political Science from the University of Iowa and received a J.D. from Drake University Law School.

Corey Kline has served as Executive Vice President, Technology since March 2021. He joined Noodles in September of 2011 as Director of IT and assumed responsibility as Vice President of IT in July 2016, a position he held through February 2021. Prior to joining Noodles, Corey worked at Famous Dave’s from March 2007 through September 2011 where he was Enterprise Applications and Risk Manager. Prior to his time in the restaurant industry Corey worked as a technology audit professional at Jefferson Wells from October 2005 to March 2006 and as a telecom technology consultant at Accenture from April of 2001 to October 2005 and as a software engineer at IBM from June 2000 through April 2001. Corey earned a BA in Mathematics with a minor in Computer Science and emphasis in Secondary Education from Luther College.

Kathy Lockhart has served as our Chief Accounting Officer since August 2020. Prior to that time she served as Vice President and Controller from August 2006 to July 2020. Prior to joining Noodles, Ms. Lockhart served as the Vice President and Controller of several public and private restaurant and retail companies, including Einstein’s, Boston Market, VICORP (parent company of Village Inn and Bakers Square restaurants) and Ultimate Electronics. She received a BA degree in Business Administration and Political Science from Western Colorado State University, and she is a CPA and CGMA.

Sue Petersen has served as Executive Vice President, Inclusion, Diversity and People since March 2021. Sue joined Noodles in February 2015 as Director of Field Talent, she was promoted to Vice President of Human Resources (“HR”) Talent in January 2016 and assumed responsibility as Vice President of Human Resources in January 2018 until her promotion in March 2021. Prior to joining Noodles, Sue worked at Walgreens from June 2009 through December 2014 where she was Regional Field HR Director for the western region providing HR leadership for 2,200 pharmacy retail locations. Prior to Walgreens, Sue worked at Quiznos from 2007 to 2009 as Director of HR. Additionally, earlier in her career, Sue worked for Rock Bottom Restaurants from 2005 to 2007 overseeing HR for the Old Chicago Brand and worked at Chipotle from 1998 to 2005 as an HR manager helping to grow the brand from 16 locations to over 500. Sue began her restaurant career working in operations with Ruby Tuesday. Sue received a BA in Business Management with an emphasis in HR and minor in business communications from the University of Northern Iowa.

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) provides a detailed description of our executive compensation philosophy and programs, the compensation decisions the Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) has made under those programs and the factors considered in making those decisions. This Compensation Discussion and Analysis focuses on the compensation of NEOs for 2021, who were:


Name						Title
Dave Boennighausen						Chief Executive Officer
Carl Lukach						Chief Financial Officer
Stacey Pool						Chief Marketing Officer
Brad West						Chief Operating Officer
Melissa Heidman						Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

Executive Summary

Performance Highlights

Key financial highlights for fiscal year 2021 compared to fiscal year 2020 include:

•Total revenue increased 20.7% to $475.2 million from $393.7 million.

•Comparable restaurant sales increased 22.1% system-wide, including an increase of 21.3% for company-owned restaurants and an increase of 27.1% for franchise restaurants.

•Company average unit volumes of $1.30 million represented a 22.2% increase versus 2020 and an 11.3% increase versus 2019.

•Digital sales grew 20.0% and accounted for 56.6% of sales.

•Net income was $3.7 million, or $0.08 per diluted share, compared to a net loss of $23.3 million, or $0.53 loss per diluted share.

•Operating margin was 1.2% compared to an operating margin of (5.1)%.

•Adjusted net income(1) was $7.8 million, or $0.17 per diluted share, compared to an adjusted net loss of $17.8 million, or $0.40 loss per diluted share.

•Restaurant contribution margin increased 400 basis points to 15.9%.

•Adjusted EBITDA increased 232.5% to $38.1 million from $11.5 million.

•Six new company-owned restaurants opened in 2021.

_____________________

(1) Restaurant contribution margin, EBITDA, adjusted EBITDA, and adjusted net income are non-GAAP measures. Reconciliations of operating income (loss) to restaurant contribution margin, net income (loss) to EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA, and net income (loss) to adjusted net income (loss) are included in the accompanying financial data. See “Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures.”

The ongoing global pandemic of the COVID-19 virus and its variants (“COVID-19 pandemic”) has, and is continuing to have, a significant impact on the restaurant industry. Our business has been adversely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic in varying degrees through occasional temporarily closed restaurants and reduced operating hours, disruption in our supply chain and shortages in the labor required to operate our restaurants. We believe we are well positioned to navigate the ongoing challenges associated with the COVID-19 pandemic given our investments in our off-premise and digital channels and the consumer demand for our menu.

The Company continues to prioritize health and safety measures under the advisory of the Centers for Disease Control (“CDC”). Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic and during 2021, the Company took several safety measures, including:

•Increased cleaning and sanitizing protocols;

•Incentivizing team members to obtain vaccinations;

•Paid time off for COVID-related illnesses;

•Requirements for wearing of masks by all team members and guests, when locally mandated; and

•Health screening process for all team members before the start of each shift.

Our business was well-positioned for the transition to largely off-premise dining. We continued our investment in digital technology to promote our off-premise channel, including implementing direct delivery nationwide through the Noodles app

and website, expanding our third party delivery services, and launching curbside delivery at all of our restaurants. The shifting demand pattern towards our off-premise offerings, including delivery, has caused a reduction in our restaurant level margins due primarily to higher delivery fees, partially offset by improved efficiencies throughout the balance of our expense profile, most notably in our labor model.

The ongoing impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our longer-term operational and financial performance will depend on future developments, including varying levels of government restrictions and continued COVID-19 variants. Many of these future developments are outside of our control and all are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted. As of the date of this filing, substantially all of our restaurants continue to operate, but a restaurant may, from time to time, temporarily close or temporarily reduced operating hours as a result of a reduction in staffing or a confirmed positive COVID-19 individual. While we cannot predict the extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic will impact our business, we intend to continue to actively monitor the evolving situation and may take further actions that alter our business operations as may be required by federal, state or local authorities or that we determine are in the best interests of our team members, customers, suppliers and shareholders.

Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures

Reconciliation of Net Income (Loss) to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA

(in thousands, unaudited)


	Fiscal Year Ended
		December 28, 2021		December 29, 2020
Net income (loss)		$	3,665	$	(23,259)
Depreciation and amortization		22,333		21,709
Interest expense, net		2,082		3,146
Provision for income taxes		70		84
EBITDA		$	28,150	$	1,680
Restaurant impairments, closure costs and asset disposals		5,727		6,540
Fees and costs related to the registration statements and related transactions		—		162
Severance costs		—		536
Stock-based compensation expense		4,271		2,554
Adjusted EBITDA		$	38,148	$	11,472

______________________________

EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA are supplemental measures of operating performance that do not represent and should not be considered as alternatives to net income (loss) or cash flow from operations, as determined by GAAP, and our calculation thereof may not be comparable to that reported by other companies. These measures are presented because we believe that investors’ understanding of our performance is enhanced by including these non-GAAP financial measures as a reasonable basis for evaluating our ongoing results of operations.

EBITDA is calculated as net income (loss) before interest expense, provision (benefit) for income taxes and depreciation and amortization. Adjusted EBITDA further adjusts EBITDA to reflect the eliminations shown in the table above.

EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA are presented because: (i) we believe they are useful measures for investors to assess the operating performance of our business without the effect of non-cash charges such as depreciation and amortization expenses and restaurant impairments, closure costs and asset disposals and (ii) we use adjusted EBITDA internally as a benchmark for certain of our cash incentive plans and to evaluate our operating performance or compare our performance to that of our competitors. The use of adjusted EBITDA as a performance measure permits a comparative assessment of our operating performance relative to our performance based on our GAAP results, while isolating the effects of some items that vary from period to period without any correlation to core operating performance or that vary widely among similar companies. Companies within our industry exhibit significant variations with respect to capital structures and cost of capital (which affect interest expense and income tax rates) and differences in book depreciation of property, plant and equipment (which affect relative depreciation expense), including significant differences in the depreciable lives of similar assets among various companies. Our management believes that adjusted EBITDA facilitates company-to-company comparisons within our industry by eliminating some of these foregoing variations. Adjusted EBITDA as presented may not be comparable to other similarly-titled measures of other companies, and our presentation of adjusted EBITDA should not be construed as an inference that our future results will be unaffected by excluded or unusual items.

Reconciliation of Net Income (Loss) to Adjusted Net Income (Loss)

(in thousands, except share and per share data, unaudited)


	Fiscal Year Ended
		December 28, 2021		December 29, 2020
Net income (loss)		$	3,665	$	(23,259)
Restaurant impairments, divestitures and closure costs (1)		4,209		4,715
Severance costs (2)		—		536
Fees and costs related to transactions and other acquisition/disposition costs (3)		—		162
Tax effect of adjustments (4)		(79)		20
Adjusted net income (loss)		$	7,795	$	(17,826)

Earnings (loss) per share
Basic		$	0.08	$	(0.53)
Diluted		$	0.08	$	(0.53)
Adjusted earnings (loss) per share (5)
Basic		$	0.17	$	(0.40)
Diluted		$	0.17	$	(0.40)
Weighted average common shares outstanding (5)
Basic		45,483,029		44,272,474
Diluted		46,125,386		44,272,474

_____________________________

Adjusted net income (loss) is a supplemental measure of financial performance that is not required by or presented in accordance with GAAP. We define adjusted net income (loss) as net income (loss) plus the impact of adjustments and the tax effects of such adjustments. Adjusted net income (loss) is presented because management believes it helps convey supplemental information to investors regarding our performance, excluding the impact of special items that affect the comparability of results in past quarters to expected results in future quarters. Adjusted net income (loss) as presented may not be comparable to other similarly-titled measures of other companies, and our presentation of adjusted net income should not be construed as an inference that our future results will be unaffected by excluded or unusual items. Our management uses this non-GAAP financial measure to analyze changes in our underlying business from quarter to quarter based on comparable financial results.

(1) Reflects the adjustment to eliminate the impact of impairing restaurants, divestiture costs and ongoing closure costs recognized in 2021 and 2020. Both periods include ongoing closure costs from restaurants closed in previous years. These expenses are included in the “Restaurant impairments, closure costs and asset disposals” line in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

(2) Reflects the adjustment to eliminate severance costs.

(3) Reflects the adjustments to eliminate the expenses related to certain corporate transactions in 2020.

(4) Reflects the tax impact of the other adjustments discussed in (1) through (3) above using the estimated annual effective tax rate. Note that the amounts in 2020 have been adjusted to reflect the respective effective tax rate.

(5) Adjusted per share amounts are calculated by dividing adjusted net income (loss) by the basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding.

Reconciliation of Operating Income (Loss) to Restaurant Contribution

(in thousands, unaudited)


	Fiscal Year Ended
		December 28, 2021			December 29, 2020
Income (loss) from operations		$	5,817		$	(20,029)
Less: Franchising royalties and fees		7,816			5,175
Plus: General and administrative		47,535			42,876
Depreciation and amortization		22,333			21,709
Pre-opening		665			443
Restaurant impairments, closure costs and asset disposals		5,727			6,540
Restaurant contribution		$	74,261		$	46,364

Restaurant contribution margin		15.9		%	11.9		%

_____________________________

Restaurant contribution represents restaurant revenue less restaurant operating costs, which are the cost of sales, labor, occupancy and other operating items. Restaurant contribution margin represents restaurant contribution as a percentage of restaurant revenue. Restaurant contribution and restaurant contribution margin are non-GAAP measures that are neither required by, nor presented in accordance with GAAP, and the calculations thereof may not be comparable to similar measures reported by other companies. These measures are supplemental measures of the operating performance of our restaurants and are not reflective of the underlying performance of our business because corporate-level expenses are excluded from these measures.

Restaurant contribution and restaurant contribution margin have limitations as analytical tools and should not be considered in isolation or as substitutes for analysis of our results as reported under GAAP. Management does not consider these measures in isolation or as an alternative to financial measures determined in accordance with GAAP. However, management believes that restaurant contribution and restaurant contribution margin are important tools for investors and other interested parties because they are widely-used metrics within the restaurant industry to evaluate restaurant-level productivity, efficiency and performance. Management also uses these measures as metrics to evaluate the profitability of incremental sales at our restaurants, restaurant performance across periods, and restaurant financial performance compared with competitors.

Executive Compensation Highlights

Our executive compensation program is designed with a “pay-for-performance” philosophy and includes the following elements: base salary, annual cash bonus opportunity, and equity-based long-term incentives (“LTIs”) awarded in a mix of restricted stock units (“RSUs”) and performance-based restricted stock units (“PSUs”) based on established financial metrics as well as relative total shareholder return (“TSR”), each described in more detail in this CD&A. Each NEO’s 2021 target total direct compensation (“TDC”) included variable elements, a significant portion of which are equity-based LTI compensation, as illustrated in the following charts:

The charts above are based upon the following: annualized base salary at 2021 year-end; 2021 target bonus; and the target grant-date fair value of 2021 annual long-term incentive awards. The other NEOs above include Mr. Lukach, Ms. Pool, Mr. West and Ms. Heidman.

2021 NEO compensation included the following:

•Annual Bonus Achievements: Our 2021 annual bonus program was based on Adjusted EBITDA1 performance (weighted 30%), Company Average Unit Volume achievement (“AUV”) (weighted 25%), accomplishment of Team Objectives (weighted 25%), and Individual Objectives (weighted 20%).

◦The Company’s achievement of its Adjusted EBITDA goals was 25% of target with strength in fundamental business performance offset by disruption and increased expenses related to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic as well as labor and supply chain pressures.

◦The Company’s achievement of its AUV 2 goals was 200% of target as the company delivered strong AUV growth throughout the year, resulting in 22.2% AUV growth relative to 2020 and 11.3% relative to 2019.

◦The Committee awarded 75% of target of the team objective component, reflecting significant advancement in restaurant level sales and guest frequency, meaningful progress towards the Company’s ESG and Human Capital initiatives, and strong new restaurant performance.

◦For each NEO’s Individual Objective component, the Committee evaluated the individual’s achievements in supporting the company’s growth strategy and results against goals approved for each individual for the 2021 fiscal year. These goals were particularly focused on advancing the company’s brand differentiation and marketing effectiveness, operations and financial model, new restaurant development, and ESG initiatives. After conducting this review, the Committee awarded 85% of target for each NEO’s Individual Objective component.

•Long-Term Equity Incentives:

◦In 2021, the Compensation Committee granted LTIs to the NEOs through a combination of PSUs and RSUs. Compared to the 2020 grants and consistent with our pay for performance approach, the Compensation Committee increased the weighting on PSUs to 60%, and reduced the weighting on RSUs to 40% of target LTI. The number of PSUs earned are based on three equally-weighted performance metrics, each measured over a three-year period: aggregate Adjusted EBITDA, System-Wide Comparable Restaurant Sales Growth (“Comp Sales Growth”)3, and relative total shareholder return (“Relative TSR”).

◦2021 was the last year of the three-year performance period for the PSUs granted in 2019, which could be earned from 0% to 200% of the target number of PSUs based on performance versus goals for System-Wide Comparable Restaurant Sales Growth (weighted 50%) and Adjusted EBITDA (weighted 50%). Based on actual performance versus the goals, payout for these PSUs was 0% achievement of the Adjusted EBITDA and 169% achievement of the System-Wide Comparable Restaurant Sales of the target number of PSUs. See “2019-2021 PSUs” on page 35 for further detail.

For additional information on these non-GAAP measures, including reconciliations to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures, see page 30 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 28, 2021.

1 We define adjusted EBITDA as net income (loss) before interest expense, provision (benefit) for income taxes, depreciation and amortization, restaurant impairments, closure costs and asset disposals, severance costs and stock-based compensation.

2 We define AUV as the average annualized sales of all company-owned restaurants for a given time period. AUVs are calculated by dividing restaurant revenue by the number of operating days within each time period and multiplying by the number of operating days we have in a typical year. Based on this calculation, temporarily closed restaurants are excluded from the definition of AUV, however restaurants with temporarily reduced operating hours are included. This measurement allows management to assess changes in consumer traffic and per person spending patterns at our restaurants. In addition to the factors that impact comparable restaurant sales, AUVs can be further impacted by effective real estate site selection and maturity and trends within new markets.

3 We define System-Wide Comparable Restaurant Sales Growth as year-over-year growth in sales for restaurants open at least 18 full periods.

Compensation Governance Highlights

Our executive compensation practices are intended to be straightforward, transparent and reflective of modern notions of strong corporate governance. Our commitment to strong corporate governance can be understood by reviewing the following list of what we do and do not do:

What We Do:

What We Do Not Do:

✔

A substantial portion of our executive pay is tied to performance.

We do not provide “single-trigger” cash severance upon a change in control.

✔

For all NEOs, 60% of our ongoing LTI compensation program is granted in PSUs, which vest based on the achievement of pre-established, multi-year financial performance goals and three-year TSR Relative to a comparator group.

We do not provide “single-trigger” vesting acceleration in annual equity awards upon a change in control.

We do not provide golden parachute excise tax or other tax gross-ups.

✔

Our Compensation Committee retains a nationally recognized, independent compensation consultant who provides no other services to the Company.

We do not provide significant perquisites or supplemental executive retirement plans.

We prohibit our NEOs and directors from hedging and pledging Company stock.

✔

We require our NEOs and directors to acquire and maintain meaningful ownership of our stock to ensure their interests are closely aligned with the long-term financial interests of our stockholders.

✔

We have a compensation recovery (“clawback”) policy.

✔

We require our NEOs to enter into reasonable non-competition and non-solicitation covenants.

Stockholder Advisory (Non-Binding) Vote on Executive Compensation

At our 2021 annual meeting of stockholders, we held our second annual advisory vote on executive compensation (“say-on-pay”), for which 98% of the votes cast were to approve our NEO compensation. The Compensation Committee interprets the overwhelmingly favorable 2021 vote as an endorsement of our compensation programs and practices, and no changes were made to our executive compensation programs as a result of the 2021 vote outcome. We routinely conduct shareholder outreach throughout the year through several forums, including restaurant and consumer focused investor conferences led by Wall Street equity analysts, particularly those analysts who have coverage on our Company, non-deal equity roadshows with the support of our Wall Street equity analysts, and post-earnings discussions with individual or a consortium of our shareholders. During these outreach discussions, we focus on key areas of the business performance and other issues that are important to them, including executive compensation, governance issues as well as social and sustainability practices. We provide a summary of our shareholder feedback to our Board and its Committees regularly, and we strive to enhance our governance and sustainability practices as well as to provide more robust disclosures.

The Compensation Committee will continue to consider the outcome of the Company’s say‑on‑pay votes and direct feedback from stockholders when making future compensation decisions for the NEOs.

Objectives of our Compensation Program

The primary objectives of our compensation programs are to:

•Attract and retain highly skilled executives. Our compensation philosophy is to provide competitive target TDC opportunities based upon then-current market data for equivalent positions at similarly-situated companies. Actual compensation earned may be above or below the target level based on performance along the metrics of the incentive compensation programs.

•Link compensation earned to achievement of the Company’s short-term and long-term financial and strategic goals. The majority of each NEO’s compensation opportunity is variable and tied to the achievement of pre-established performance objectives and/or the performance of our stock.

•Align the interests of management with those of our stockholders. A substantial portion of NEO compensation is in the form of equity-based incentives, subject to multi-year vesting schedules. In addition, we have robust stock ownership guidelines that require our NEOs to acquire and maintain a meaningful ownership position in our stock.

•Adhere to high standards of corporate governance. Our program has appropriate balances between fixed and variable, short-term and long-term, and cash and equity components to mitigate compensation-related risks. Our compensation-related policies such as stock ownership guidelines, clawback policy, anti-hedging policy and anti-pledging policy further support strong governance principles.

Compensation Decision-Making Process

Role of Compensation Committee and Management

The Compensation Committee, with input from certain members of management, has responsibility for administering and approving annually all elements of compensation for the Company’s NEOs. It also reviews and approves the Company’s incentive compensation plans and equity-based plans.

Management provides input into the design of incentive compensation programs to provide that these programs support the Company’s business objectives and strategic priorities. With respect to performance measures and goals, the annual business plan initially established by management, but approved by our Board, is an important input into the Compensation Committee’s decision-making process. In addition, our CEO works with the Compensation Committee and its independent consultant to develop recommendations for pay levels for executives other than himself, based on competitive market data, past performance and future potential. As appropriate, certain members of the senior management team attend Compensation Committee meetings, but are not present for executive sessions. The Compensation Committee makes all final decisions with respect to compensation of our NEOs.

Role of Consultants

The Compensation Committee has engaged FW Cook as its independent executive compensation advisor. FW Cook consults on compensation levels and program design in support of our business strategy, and alerts the Compensation Committee to regulatory and governance developments related to executive compensation. A representative of FW Cook, when requested, attends meetings of our Compensation Committee, is available to participate in executive sessions and communicates directly with our Compensation Committee Chairman or its members outside of meetings. FW Cook reports directly to the Compensation Committee and does no work for management that is not under the Compensation Committee’s purview. The Compensation Committee assessed the independence of FW Cook pursuant to SEC rules and Nasdaq listing standards and concluded that no conflicts of interest exist.

Peer Group Benchmarking

The Compensation Committee selected the following companies as our peer group for purposes of conducting a competitive compensation analysis in 2019 that informed decisions on 2021 pay opportunities:


BJ’s Restaurants, Inc.			Habit Restaurants, Inc.
Cheesecake Factory			Luby’s, Inc.
Chuy’s Holdings, Inc.			Potbelly Corporation
Dave & Buster’s			Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc.
Del Taco Restaurants, Inc.			Ruth’s Hospitality
El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc.			Shake Shack Inc.
Fiesta Restaurant Group, Inc.

As of June 30, 2019 (when the peer group was constructed), the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentiles for various size metrics of the peer group, and the size metrics and related percentile of Noodles & Company, were as follows:


	Number of Company-Operated Locations	Latest Four Quarters Net Revenue ($mil)	Most Recent Fiscal Year Total Team Members	Market Cap. At 6/30/2019 ($mil)
75th Percentile	301	$1,129	16,098	$911
50th Percentile	211	$493	7,544	$410
25th Percentile	128	$418	6,101	$355
Noodles & Company	395	$457	9,400	$345
%-ile Rank	89th %-ile	42nd %-ile	61st %-ile	24th %-ile

The peer group data was used by the Compensation Committee to inform decisions for all NEO compensation and in making decisions regarding the form and amount of LTI compensation granted in 2021.

A competitive analysis was not conducted in 2020 (to inform 2021 pay decisions) due to the COVID pandemic and its impact on the restaurant industry. A competitive compensation analysis was conducted in late 2021 to inform pay decisions for fiscal 2022. At that time, the Committee approved minor changes to the compensation peer group, which included the removal of Habit Restaurants and Luby’s and the addition of BBQ Holdings and One Group.

Compensation Components

The principal elements of target TDC for our NEOs are base salary, annual cash bonus opportunities, and equity-based, LTI awards. Each of the components is discussed below.

Base Salary

Base salaries provide a minimum level of pay that reflects each NEO’s position and scope of responsibility, individual performance, and future potential, as demonstrated over time. Base salaries are re-evaluated annually to determine whether adjustments are appropriate given changes in the market data or in executive responsibilities. Our CEO makes recommendations to the Compensation Committee with respect to changes to the base salary of our NEOs, other than himself. Our Compensation Committee determines and approves any changes to the base salaries of our CEO and our other NEOs. In early 2021, Mr. Boennighausen, Ms. Pool and Ms. Heidman received increases in their annual salaries consistent with the Company’s merit increase allocation. The Compensation Committee increased Mr. West’s salary on March 1, 2021 in connection with his promotion and appointment as COO. Mr. Lukach did not receive an increase in 2021 as he was hired in late 2020 and the Compensation Committee determined his base salary at that time.


Name	2020 Annual Salary	2021 Annual Salary	% Change
Dave Boennighausen	$600,000	$618,000	3.0%
Carl Lukach (1)	$350,000	$350,000	—%
Stacey Pool	$325,000	$335,000	3.1%
Brad West	$306,000	$335,000	9.5%
Melissa Heidman	$306,000	$316,000	3.3%

________________________

(1) Mr. Lukach was hired November 30, 2020 and did not receive a salary adjustment in 2021.

Performance-Based Annual Cash Bonus

Our annual cash bonus program is designed to reward annual accomplishments against pre-established financial and strategic goals. For 2021, each NEO had a bonus opportunity, expressed as a percentage of current base salary. Earned bonuses could range from 0% to 200% of target bonus opportunity, as summarized in the following table:


	Annual Bonus Opportunity
	as % of Base Salary			$
Name	Threshold	Target	Max	Threshold	Target	Max
Dave Boennighausen	25%	100%	200%	$154,500	$618,000	$1,236,000
Carl Lukach	15%	60%	120%	$52,500	$210,000	$420,000
Stacey Pool	15%	60%	120%	$50,250	$201,000	$402,000
Brad West	15%	60%	120%	$50,250	$201,000	$402,000
Melissa Heidman	12.5%	50%	100%	$39,500	$158,000	$316,000

For NEOs, the actual bonus is based on achievement of Company financial performance measured by adjusted EBITDA (30% weight), AUV Growth (25% weight), achievement of Team Objectives (weighted 25%) approved in advance by the Compensation Committee and achievement of Individual Objectives (20% weight) approved in advance by the Compensation Committee.

The Compensation Committee selected Adjusted EBITDA and AUV Growth as the financial performance measures because they represent the clearest measures of our operational performance and they generally allow for over achievement to be self-funded. The threshold, target, and maximum Adjusted EBITDA and AUV Growth goals, along with our actual performance in 2021 are outlined in the following table:


Measure	Threshold	Target	Maximum	Actual	Unweighted % of Target Bonus Earned
Adjusted EBITDA (weighted 30%)	$37.9	$42.1	$50.5	$38.1	25%
Average Unit Volume Growth (weighted 25%)	1.0%	4.0%	7.0%	22.2%	200%

The Compensation Committee developed the Team Objectives, common to all senior executives, including the NEOs, to focus on accelerated growth strategies. The Team Objectives component was weighted 25% and included measures in three primary categories. Some of the key achievements related to the Team Objectives include:

Footprint Expansion

•Strong financial performance of new units, with openings from 2019 through 2021 performing above Company average.

•Development of a franchise sales program, including the signing of new agreement for El Paso and Southeast New Mexico as well as a transaction closed in early 2022 of a 55-unit agreement for California.

•Execution of new, smaller square footage prototype, inclusive of an order ahead drive thru window, to support accelerated unit growth.

•Identification of cost savings opportunities to reduce development cost of future openings and mitigate construction supply chain pressures.

AUV Growth

•Company average unit volumes of $1.30 million represented a 22.2% increase versus 2020 and an 11.3% increase versus 2019, inclusive of record AUV’s in the third fiscal quarter..

•Bolstered Company’s digital sales capabilities, increasing digital sales 20% relative to 2020, accounting for 57% of total sales in 2021.

•Increased frequency of guests in the company’s Rewards Program, while increasing number of known guests in our program.

Environment, Social and Governance (ESG)

•Launched the company’s initial “Nourish and Inspire Impact report”, detailing the Company’s commitment to food, people, planet and community.

•Advanced the Company’s strategy around inclusion and diversity, including recognition by Forbes Magazine as a best place to work both for Women and Diversity.

•Executed strategies to reduce the Company’s environmental impact, inclusive of initiatives to reduce energy and water usage.

•Navigated a challenging staffing environment with commitment to Company’s values, resulting in improved management tenure and lower management turnover relative to the industry.

Based on the above accomplishments, the Committee awarded payout for the Team Objectives component at 75% of target.

Each NEO had specific, pre-established Individual Objectives, weighted (20%). The Compensation Committee reviewed each NEO’s achievements against their objectives and awarded payout at 85% of target for each NEO. Considerations in the determination of individual performance included:

Dave Boennighausen

•Led cross-functional team to navigate successfully the impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic, including ensuring full adherence to governmental regulations and rigorous food safety and cleanliness standards.

•Continued to deliver on-trend, impactful culinary innovation, inclusive of the launch of Tortelloni, one of the most successful new menu introductions in the Company’s history.

•Bolstered the company’s unit economic model, supporting objectives for growth in unit development, average unit volumes, and restaurant level margin.

•Developed a franchising strategy to position organization to accelerate franchise unit growth in support of its accelerated growth objectives.

Carl Lukach

•Diligently managed the Company’s liquidity position, strengthening the Company’s balance sheet, evidenced by a reduction in long-term debt from $40.9 million at the end of fiscal 2020 to $18.9 million at the end of fiscal 2021.

•Completed several cost saving initiatives, inclusive of the Company’s rollout of equipment to improve labor efficiency.

•Supported supply chain, in an environment of meaningful disruption, to ensure stability to our restaurants of food and packaging.

Stacey Pool

•Advanced the Company’s digital and guest engagement initiatives, resulting in meaningful increases to digital sales and guest frequency.

•Effectively supported the launch of new menu introductions, inclusive of the successful launch of Tortelloni.

•Activated the brand through enhanced positioning and targeted communication, resulting in increased brand awareness and share of voice from marketing communications.

Brad West

•Developed operational leaders throughout the organization, resulting in strong General Manager retention and new restaurant execution.

•Supported the franchise community, resulting in strengthened financial performance for our franchise community and successful navigation of COVID-19 disruption.

•Executed initiatives to improve efficiencies in restaurant, inclusive of new equipment and operational procedures.

Melissa Heidman

•Led development and execution of the Company’s “Nourish and Inspire Impact Report”, detailing the Company’s commitment to food, people, planet and community.

•Proactively ensured company compliance with changing regulatory landscape, in particular as related to the changing COVID-19 regulations and restrictions.

•Bolstered the Company’s Enterprise Risk Management program, identifying short and long term areas of risk and establishing strategies around risk mitigation.

The Compensation Committee awarded the NEOs the percentage of their respective target amounts and actual bonus amounts set forth in the table below. These amounts are also disclosed in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table.


Name	Bonus Earned		Percent of Target
Dave Boennighausen	$	576,285	93.25	%
Carl Lukach	$	195,825	93.25	%
Stacey Pool	$	187,433	93.25	%
Brad West	$	187,433	93.25	%
Melissa Heidman	$	147,335	93.25	%

Ongoing Long-Term Equity Incentives-

The Committee’s approach to providing long-term incentives and rewarding achievement of financial goals includes granting a combination of PSUs and RSUs. In 2021, consistent with our pay for performance philosophy, the Committee increased the weighting on PSUs to 60% and decreased the weighting of RSUs to 40% of target LTI. The number of PSUs that may be earned is from 0 to 200% of the target number granted, based on three equally-weighted performance metrics, each measured over a three-year period: aggregate Adjusted EBITDA, Comp Sales Growth, and Relative TSR. The Committee believes that this combination of performance metrics provides the appropriate balance of top line growth with bottom line profitability, financial performance with stock market performance, and performance versus internal goals with performance relative to other restaurant companies. We reward achievement of adjusted EBITDA in our annual incentive program, and want to also ensure focus on sustained strong performance on this measure over multiple years by using it as a measure for the Financial PSUs. The PSUs granted during fiscal years 2019 to 2021 were based on target performance measures over the Company’s comparable sales growth and Adjusted EBITDA (“Financial PSU”).

The target number of PSUs tied to Adjusted EBITDA and Comp Sales Growth, and the number of RSUs awarded is determined by dividing the intended grant value by the closing price per share of Noodles & Company common stock on the date of grant. The target number of Relative TSR PSUs is determined by dividing the intended grant value by the Monte Carlo value per target share on the grant date.

The PSUs tied to Adjusted EBITDA and Comp Sales Growth may be earned from 25% of target for achievement of threshold goals up to 200% of target for achievement of maximum goals, based on performance versus the metrics. If performance is below the threshold goal, no PSUs are earned for that component.


Adjusted EBITDA and Comp Sales Growth Performance Level			Payout (% of Target PSUs)
Maximum			200%
Target			100%
Threshold			25%
Below Threshold			0%

The Relative TSR PSUs may be earned from 50% of target for achievement of threshold performance to 200% of target for achievement of maximum performance, according to the following percentile ranks:


Performance Level	Relative TSR Percentile Rank	Payout (% of Target PSUs)
Maximum	>=85th percentile	200%
Target	55th percentile	100%
Threshold	25th percentile	50%
Below Threshold	<25th percentile	0%

Payout is linearly interpolated for performance between levels. If performance is below the 25th percentile threshold, no PSUs are earned for the Relative TSR component.

For the Relative TSR PSUs granted in 2021, three-year TSR for Noodles & Company will be measured relative to the following 30-company comparator group, which represents the Russell 3000 Restaurants Sub-Industry (GICS code 25301040), excluding Aramark and Yum China:


Biglari Holdings Inc. (NYSE:BH.A)			Fiesta Restaurant Group, Inc. (NasdaqGS:FRGI)
BJ's Restaurants, Inc. (NasdaqGS:BJRI)			Jack in the Box Inc. (NasdaqGS:JACK)
Bloomin' Brands, Inc. (NasdaqGS:BLMN)			Kura Sushi USA, Inc. (NasdaqGM:KRUS)
Brinker International, Inc. (NYSE:EAT)			McDonald's Corporation (NYSE:MCD)
Carrols Restaurant Group, Inc. (NasdaqGS:TAST)			Nathan's Famous, Inc. (NasdaqGS:NATH)
Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (NYSE:CMG)			Papa John's International, Inc. (NasdaqGS:PZZA)
Chuy's Holdings, Inc. (NasdaqGS:CHUY)			Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. (NasdaqGS:RRGB)
Cracker Barrel (NasdaqGS:CBRL)			Ruth's Hospitality Group, Inc. (NasdaqGS:RUTH)


Darden Restaurants, Inc. (NYSE:DRI)			Shake Shack Inc. (NYSE:SHAK)
Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. (NasdaqGS:PLAY)			Starbucks Corporation (NasdaqGS:SBUX)
Del Taco Restaurants, Inc. (NasdaqCM:TACO)			Texas Roadhouse, Inc. (NasdaqGS:TXRH)
Denny's Corporation (NasdaqCM:DENN)			The Cheesecake Factory (NasdaqGS:CAKE)
Dine Brands Global, Inc. (NYSE:DIN)			The Wendy's Company (NasdaqGS:WEN)
Domino's Pizza, Inc. (NYSE:DPZ)			Wingstop Inc. (NasdaqGS:WING)
El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc. (NasdaqGS:LOCO)			Yum! Brands, Inc. (NYSE:YUM)

2019 Financial PSUs

The Financial PSUs granted in 2019 could be earned based on three-year System-Wide Comparable Restaurant Sales Growth (weighted 50%) and three-year cumulative Adjusted EBITDA (weighted 50%). The actual payout was 84% of the target number of shares based on the following achievement versus target goals:


Measure	Target	Actual	Payout (% of Target PSUs)
System-Wide Comparable Restaurant Sales Growth (CAGR) (weighted 50%)	2.0%	3.4%	168.5%
3-year Cumulative Adjusted EBITDA ($mil.) (weighted 50%)	$106.3	$94.3	0%

Employment Agreements

In 2020, the Compensation Committee approved employment agreements for the Company’s NEO’s in order to standardize the Company’s approach to severance payments in the event of NEO separations, as well as to provide updated non-compete agreements for the NEOs. For additional information on our employment agreements, see pages “Employment and Severance Agreements” on page 42.

Benefits and Perquisites

We provide our executive officers with access to the same benefits we provide all of our full-time team members. We maintain a tax-qualified retirement plan that provides eligible U.S. team members with an opportunity to save for retirement on a tax-advantaged basis. Eligible team members are able to defer eligible compensation subject to applicable annual Internal Revenue Code limits. Employer contributions were made to the 401(k) plan in 2021.We also provide our executive officers with perquisites and other benefits we believe are reasonable and consistent with our compensation objectives. These benefits include a car allowance, relocation benefits in the case of executive officers relocating to the Denver, Colorado metropolitan area, certain life and disability insurance, and health and wellness benefits. Executive officers and certain other highly compensated team members are also eligible to participate in a deferred compensation program, which permits them to defer payment of salary and bonus to future years, but which does not include a company contribution.

Compensation Policies and Other Considerations

Stock Ownership Requirements

Our Board has adopted stock ownership requirements that restrict sales of our stock by our NEOs and our non-employee directors if those sales would cause the value of such individual’s stock holdings to fall below a certain threshold. Currently, the threshold for our non-employee directors is two times their annual cash retainer. The ownership requirement for our NEOs is two times the base salary for our CEO and one times the base salary for all other executive officers.

For purposes of these requirements, an officer’s holdings include vested shares held directly by the officer or his/her immediate family members, including vested RSUs and PSUs. Unvested RSUs and PSUs and unexercised stock options do not count as ownership toward the requirement. Until the required ownership level is achieved, the NEOs and non-employee directors must retain 50% of all shares received on vesting or earn-out of RSUs and PSUs, net of shares withheld or sold to satisfy tax obligations, and 50% of shares received on exercise of stock options, net of shares tendered or withheld for payment of the exercise price and net of shares withheld or sold to satisfy tax obligations. The ownership requirements do not restrict the disposition of holdings from equity grants made in 2018 or prior years, before the stock ownership requirements were adopted.

These requirements, together with our continued use of equity-based compensation, are intended to emphasize the alignment of interests between management and our stockholders in a demonstrable and firm manner, with the objective of encouraging high performance and discouraging inappropriate risk taking.

Anti-Hedging Policy

The Company’s Insider Trading Policy provides that directors, officers (including NEOs) and team members of the Company may not engage in the following with regard to equity securities of the Company held, directly or indirectly, by such persons or granted to such persons as part of his or her compensation(a) short-term trading (generally defined as selling Company securities within six months following a purchase); (b) short sales (selling Company securities the seller does not own); (c) transactions involving publicly traded options or other derivatives, such as trading in puts or calls in Company securities; or (d) hedging transactions. The foregoing restrictions also apply to immediate family members of NEOs, which consist of any child, stepchild, parent, stepparent, spouse, sibling, mother-in-law, father-in-law, son-in-law, daughter-in-law, brother-in-law, or sister-in-law and any person (other than a tenant or employee) sharing the household of the NEO.

Anti-Pledging Policy

The Company’s Insider Trading Policy provides that our directors, NEOs and team members, as well as certain related parties, are prohibited from entering into pledging transactions or similar arrangements with respect to Company securities.

Clawback Policy

Pursuant to our clawback policy, if we are required to file an accounting restatement due to material noncompliance with any financial reporting requirement or incentive compensation was awarded based on performance achievement calculated in a materially inaccurate manner, the Company may recoup a proportional amount of the incentive compensation paid or credited to a person covered by the policy. Executive officers are covered by this policy.

Tax Considerations

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code (“Section 162(m)”) generally disallows a publicly held corporation’s tax deduction for compensation paid to its CEO and certain of its other executive officers in excess of $1 million in any year. While Section 162(m) will limit the deductibility of compensation paid to the NEOs, the Committee will continue to retain flexibility to design compensation programs that are in the best long-term interests of the Company and our stockholders, with deductibility of compensation being one of a variety of considerations taken into account. Accordingly, the Compensation Committee retains the ability to pay compensation that exceeds the deduction limitation under Section 162(m).

Compensation Risk Assessment

Our Compensation Committee considers risks related to our compensation programs (especially with respect to our executive compensation programs) when determining how to structure our team members’ compensation. In October 2021, the Compensation Committee reviewed a compensation risk assessment conducted by its independent compensation consultant FW Cook. Based on its consideration of this assessment, the Compensation Committee concluded that risks arising from our compensation policies and practices are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our Company. In reaching this conclusion, the Compensation Committee considered the following aspects of our compensation programs that discourage excessive risk-taking:

•Balance between fixed and variable, short-term and long-term, and cash and equity in the TDC mix.

•Incentive awards incorporate multiple measures of performance, which diversifies the risks associated with any single indicator of performance.

•Payouts under our incentive plans are subject to caps.

•All of our equity grants vest over a multi-year period, which encourages grantees to take a long-term view.

•We maintain policies specifically intended to mitigate risk, such as our stock ownership guidelines and clawback, and anti-pledging policies.

•Independent Compensation Committee oversight and discretion.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

Our Compensation Committee reviewed and discussed the foregoing “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” with management, and based on such review and discussions, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board that the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” be included in this Proxy Statement.

Robert Hartnett, Chairman

Jeffrey Jones

Drew Madsen

Elisa Schreiber

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

2021 Summary Compensation Table

The following table summarizes the compensation for 2021, 2020 and 2019 awarded to, earned by or paid to our principal executive officer, our principal financial officer, and the three most highly-compensated executives other than the principal executive officer.


Name and Principal Position	Year	Salary		Bonus (2)		Stock Awards (3)		Option Awards (4)		Non-equity Incentive Plan Compensation		All Other Compensation (5)		Total
Dave Boennighausen	2021	$	614,539	$	—	$	1,199,967	$	—	$	576,285	$	17,952	$	2,408,743
CEO	2020	565,385		—		1,200,000		—		240,000		5,080		2,010,465
	2019	548,654		—		399,997		200,041		468,180		13,597		1,630,469
Carl Lukach (1)	2021	350,000		—		399,961		—		195,825		107,069		1,052,855
CFO	2020	16,154		50,000		99,995		—		—		—		166,149
Stacey Pool (1)	2021	333,077		—		399,961		—		187,433		18,361		938,832
Chief Marketing Officer	2020	296,250		100,000		399,992		—		78,000		4,756		878,998
Brad West	2021	329,423		—		399,961		—		187,433		18,818		935,635
Executive Vice President, Operations	2020	287,193		—		349,992		—		61,200		8,790		707,175
	2019	261,539		—		166,662		83,349		137,700		7,966		657,216
Melissa Heidman	2021	314,077		—		349,966		—		147,335		15,910		827,288
Executive Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary	2020	287,193		—		349,992		—		61,200		8,590		706,975
	2019	284,231		—		166,662		83,349		137,700		15,320		687,262

______________________________

(1)Carl Lukach was appointed as CFO in November 2020 and Stacey Pool was appointed as Chief Marketing Officer in December 2019; therefore, neither Mr. Lukach nor Ms. Pool was an NEO in 2019.

(2)The Company paid Ms. Pool a one-time sign-on bonus of $100,000 when she began employment in 2020. Additionally, the Company paid Mr. Lukach a one-time sign-on bonus of $50,000 when he was hired in November 2020.

(3)Amounts under “Stock Awards” represent the aggregate grant date fair value of PSUs and RSUs granted in 2021, 2020 and 2019, calculated in accordance with FASB Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718. The grant-date fair value of PSUs tied to financial performance and RSUs is the closing price of the Company's common stock on the grant date times the number of shares granted (target number of shares in the case of PSUs). The grant-date fair value of the Relative TSR PSUs is the Monte Carlo value per target share on the grant date times the number of target shares granted. These amounts may not correspond to the actual value eventually realized by each NEO because the value depends on the market value of our common stock as well as the number of PSUs earned. The PSUs granted in 2021, 2020 and 2019 will only vest upon the achievement of certain performance conditions including the Company’s three-year average growth in comparable restaurant sales, three-year cumulative adjusted EBITDA, and three-year relative TSR. The maximum value of PSUs for 2021 is $2,399,934 for Mr. Boennighausen, $799,922 for Mr. Lukach, Mr. West, and Ms. Pool, and $699,932 for Ms. Heidman. A further description of the methodologies and assumptions we use to value PSUs and RSUs is described in Note 9, Stock-Based Compensation, to our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 28, 2021.

(4)Amounts under “Option Awards” represent the aggregate grant date fair value of stock options granted in 2019, calculated in accordance with FASB Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718. A description of the methodologies and assumptions we use to value option awards and the manner in which we recognize the related expense are described in Note 9, Stock-Based Compensation, to our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 28, 2021. These amounts may not correspond to the actual value eventually realized by each NEO because the value depends on the market value of our common stock.

(5)Amounts shown in this column are detailed in the table below for 2021:

SEC Form DEF 14A filed by Noodles & Company