tm2121240-1_def14a - none

DEF 14A 1 tm2121240-1_def14a.htm DEF 14A tm2121240-1_def14a - none - 9.2500742s

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SCHEDULE 14A
(Rule 14a-101)

INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934

Filed by the Registrant ☒

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☐

Check the appropriate box:

☐

Preliminary Proxy Statement

☐

Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

☒

Definitive Proxy Statement

☐

Definitive Additional Materials

☐

Soliciting Material Pursuant to § 240.14a-12

REPAY HOLDINGS CORPORATION

(Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

☒

No fee required.

☐

Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

(1)

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

(2)

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

(3)

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

(4)

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

(5)

Total fee paid:

☐

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

☐

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

(1)

Amount Previously Paid:

(2)

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

(3)

Filing Party:

(4)

Date Filed:

TABLE OF CONTENTS

July 9, 2021

Dear Stockholder:

On behalf of the Board of Directors, I cordially invite you to attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Repay Holdings Corporation, which will be held virtually on Wednesday, August 18, 2021, commencing at 10:00 a.m., Eastern Time. To attend the Annual Meeting, you must register in advance at www.viewproxy.com/Repay/2021. The meeting can be accessed through the link you receive following registration, where you will be able to listen to the meeting live, submit questions and vote online. Questions related to the Annual Meeting or voting matters can also be submitted in advance by email to virtualmeeting@viewproxy.com or by telephone at 1-866-612-8937. The matters to be acted upon at the meeting are described in the attached Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy Statement.

All of our stockholders of record at the close of business on June 23, 2021 are entitled to attend and vote at the Annual Meeting. If you were a beneficial holder as of the record date (i.e. you hold your shares in “street name” through an intermediary, such as a bank or broker), you must show proof of ownership to attend the Annual Meeting, and you must obtain a legal proxy, executed in your favor, from the holder of record in order to vote at the Annual Meeting.

In order to attend or vote at the Annual Meeting, you must register in advance at www.viewproxy.com/Repay/2021 prior to the deadline of August 16, 2021 at 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time. Upon completing your registration, you will receive further instructions via email, including your unique link and password that will allow you access to the meeting, to submit questions during the meeting and to vote at the meeting. You will not be able to attend the Annual Meeting in person.

Your vote on the business to be considered at the meeting is important, regardless of the number of shares you own. Whether or not you plan to attend the meeting, please submit your proxy or voting instructions using one of the voting methods described in the accompanying Proxy Statement so that your shares may be represented at the meeting. Submitting your proxy or voting instructions by any of these methods will not affect your right to attend the virtual meeting and for stockholders of record to vote your shares at the virtual meeting if you wish to do so.

Sincerely yours,

John Morris
Chief Executive Officer and Director

TABLE OF CONTENTS

REPAY HOLDINGS CORPORATION

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 18, 2021

Notice is hereby given that the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Repay Holdings Corporation, a Delaware corporation, will be held virtually on Wednesday, August 18, 2021, at 10:00 a.m., Eastern Time. The meeting can be accessed through the link provided following registration where you will be able to listen to the meeting live, submit questions and vote online. If you plan to attend the virtual Annual Meeting, please see the instructions beginning on page 2 of the attached Proxy Statement. You will be required to register in advance at www.viewproxy.com/Repay/2021 prior to the deadline of August 16, 2021 at 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time in order to attend the meeting. There will be no physical location for stockholders to attend. Stockholders only may participate by logging in via the link provided using the password you receive following registration. We believe that a virtual Annual Meeting provides greater access to those who want to attend, especially in light of current public health concerns, and therefore have chosen this format over an in-person meeting.

At the Annual Meeting, stockholders will be asked to consider and vote upon the following proposals:

To elect two Class II directors for terms expiring at the 2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders;

To approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers (as defined in this Proxy Statement);

To approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, the frequency of future stockholder advisory votes on the compensation of our named executive officers;

To ratify the appointment of Grant Thornton, LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2021;

To approve our 2021 Employee Stock Purchase Plan; and

To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof.

Our Board of Directors recommends that you vote “FOR” each of the nominees for Class II directors (Proposal One), “FOR” the approval of the compensation of our named executive officers (Proposal Two), “ONE YEAR” for the frequency of future advisory votes on the compensation of our named executive officers (Proposal Three), “FOR” ratification of the proposed independent registered public accounting firm (Proposal Four) and “FOR” the approval of our 2021 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (Proposal Five).

Our Board of Directors has fixed the close of business on June 23, 2021 as the record date for determining the stockholders entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting or any adjournments. For 10 days prior to the Annual Meeting, a list of such stockholders will be available for inspection by any stockholder at our principal executive offices during normal business hours. In addition, the list will be available to any stockholder for examination online during the Annual Meeting. Instructions will be provided during the Annual Meeting regarding how to access the list during the Annual Meeting.

If you were a beneficial holder as of June 23, 2021 (i.e. you hold your shares in “street name” through an intermediary, such as a bank or broker), you must obtain a legal proxy, executed in your favor, from the holder of record in order to vote at the Annual Meeting.

We encourage you to access the Annual Meeting before the start time of 10:00 a.m., Eastern Time, on August 18, 2021. Please allow ample time for online check-in, which will begin at 9:30 a.m., Eastern Time, on August 18, 2021.

Whether or not you plan to attend the virtual Annual Meeting, our Board of Directors urges you to read the attached Proxy Statement and submit a proxy or voting instructions for your shares via the internet or by telephone, or complete, date, sign and return your proxy card or voting instruction form in the pre-addressed, postage-paid envelope provided. We encourage you to submit your proxy or voting instructions via the internet, which is convenient, helps reduce the environmental impact of our Annual Meeting and saves us

TABLE OF CONTENTS

significant postage and processing costs. For instructions on how to submit your proxy or voting instructions, please refer to “General Information — Voting Methods” beginning on page 3 of the attached Proxy Statement.

By Order of the Board of Directors,

Tyler B. Dempsey
General Counsel and Secretary

Atlanta, Georgia
July 9, 2021

TABLE OF CONTENTS

	PAGE
GENERAL INFORMATION		1
PROPOSAL ONE: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS		7
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF REPAY		11
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE		13
REPORT OF AUDIT COMMITTEE		21
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS		23
Executive Summary		23
Process for Determining Named Executive Officers’ Compensation		27
Named Executive Officers’ Compensation in 2020		29
Other Important Compensation Policies Affecting the Named Executive Officers		33
Additional Compensation Matters		37
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION		39
Summary Executive Compensation Table		39
Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table		39
Narrative Disclosure to Summary Executive Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table		40
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End		41
Option Exercises and Stock Vested Table		41
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change-In-Control		42
Pay Ratio Disclosure		44
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION		45
2020 Director Compensation Table		45
Narrative Disclosure to Director Compensation Table		45
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION		47
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT		48
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT		49
DELINQUENT SECTION 16(a) REPORTS		53
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS		54
AUDITOR FEES		59
PROPOSAL TWO: ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION		60
PROPOSAL THREE: ADVISORY VOTE ON THE FREQUENCY OF FUTURE ADVISORY VOTES ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION		61
PROPOSAL FOUR: RATIFICATION OF SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM		62
PROPOSAL FIVE: APPROVAL OF THE EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN PROPOSAL		63
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS		67

TABLE OF CONTENTS

REPAY HOLDINGS CORPORATION

3 West Paces Ferry Road, Suite 200
Atlanta, Georgia 30305
(404) 504-7472

PROXY STATEMENT
ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 18, 2021

GENERAL INFORMATION

Introduction

We are furnishing this Proxy Statement on behalf of the Board of Directors of Repay Holdings Corporation, a Delaware corporation, for use at our 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, or at any adjournment or postponement of the meeting (the “Annual Meeting”), for the purposes set forth below and in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The Annual Meeting will be held virtually, at 10:00 a.m., Eastern Time, on Wednesday, August 18, 2021. The meeting can be accessed through the link provided using the password you receive following registration, where you will be able to listen to the meeting live, submit questions and vote online. If you plan to attend the virtual Annual Meeting, please see “General Information — Attendance at the Virtual Annual Meeting.” You will be required to register in advance at www.viewproxy.com/Repay/2021 prior to the deadline of August 16, 2021 at 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time in order to attend the meeting. There will be no physical location for stockholders to attend. Stockholders only may participate by logging in through the link provided using the password you receive following registration.

Repay Holdings Corporation was formed upon the closing (the “Closing”) of the merger (the “Business Combination”) of Hawk Parent Holdings LLC (“Hawk Parent”) with a subsidiary of Thunder Bridge Acquisition, Ltd. (“Thunder Bridge”), a special purpose acquisition company, on July 11, 2019. In connection with the Closing, Thunder Bridge changed its name to “Repay Holdings Corporation.”

We are headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia. Our legacy business was founded as M & A Ventures, LLC, a Georgia limited liability company doing business as REPAY: Realtime Electronic Payments (“REPAY LLC”), in 2006 by current executives John Morris and Shaler Alias. Hawk Parent was formed in 2016 in connection with the acquisition of a majority interest in the successor entity of REPAY LLC and its subsidiaries by certain investment funds sponsored by, or affiliated with, Corsair Capital LLC (“Corsair”).

As used in this Proxy Statement, unless otherwise noted or unless the context otherwise requires, the terms “we”, “us”, “Repay” and the “Company” and similar references refer (1) before the Business Combination, to Hawk Parent and its consolidated subsidiaries and (2) from and after the Business Combination, to Repay Holdings Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries. Throughout this section, unless otherwise noted or unless the context otherwise requires, “Thunder Bridge” refers to Thunder Bridge Acquisition. Ltd. prior to the consummation of the Business Combination. The term “Board” refers to our Board of Directors.

On or about July 9, 2021, we will begin mailing to all stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting this Proxy Statement and the enclosed proxy materials. Although not part of this Proxy Statement, we will also mail with this Proxy Statement our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, containing our financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020.

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Stockholder Meeting To Be Held on August 18, 2021:

This Proxy Statement and our Annual Report on Form 10-K are available for viewing and downloading at www.viewproxy.com/Repay/2021.

Voting Rights

We have two classes of common stock: Class A, which has one vote per share, and Class V, which has the number of votes equal to the number of Post-Merger Repay Units (as adjusted pursuant to the Exchange

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Agreement to reflect the then-current conversion ratio of Post-Merger Repay Units into shares of Class A common stock, all as described in “Related Party Transactions-Hawk Parent Related Party Transactions”) held by such Class V holder at the time of such vote. The Class A common stock and Class V common stock generally vote together as a single class on all matters submitted to a vote of stockholders, except as otherwise required by applicable law or our organizational documents.

The close of business on June 23, 2021, has been fixed as the record date for the determination of our stockholders entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting. On the record date, we had outstanding 90,524,135 shares of Class A common stock (including 2,301,776 shares of unvested restricted stock that have voting rights) and 25 shares of Class V common stock, representing 7,933,893 votes on behalf of Class V common stockholders. There are no cumulative voting rights in connection with the election of directors.

Quorum

For each proposal to be considered at the Annual Meeting, the holders of a majority of the number of shares entitled to vote on such matter at the meeting, present in person or by proxy, will constitute a quorum. Both abstentions and “broker non-votes” will be treated as present for purposes of determining a quorum. A “broker non-vote,” however, does not count as a vote in favor of or against a particular proposal for which the broker has no discretionary voting authority. “Broker non-votes” are votes that brokers holding shares of record for their customers (i.e., in “street name”) are not permitted to cast under applicable stock market regulations because the brokers have not received instructions (or have received incomplete instructions) from their customers as to certain proposals.

Distinction Between Holding Shares as a Stockholder of Record and as a Beneficial Owner

Some of our stockholders hold their shares through a broker, trustee, or other nominee rather than directly in their own name. As summarized below, there are some distinctions between shares held of record and those shares owned beneficially.

Stockholder of Record. If your shares are registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company or if you hold a share of Class V common stock, then you are considered, with respect to those shares, the “stockholder of record.” As the stockholder of record, you have the right to grant your voting proxy directly to us or to a third party, or to vote your shares at the Annual Meeting, provided you have properly pre-registered for the meeting. If you hold unvested shares of restricted stock granted under our equity incentive plan, you will be deemed to be a stockholder of record of those shares.

Beneficial Owner. If your shares are held in a brokerage account, by a trustee or by another nominee, then you are considered the “beneficial owner” of those shares. As the beneficial owner of those shares, you have the right to direct your broker, trustee, or nominee how to vote and you also are invited to attend the Annual Meeting. In order to attend the Annual Meeting, you will need to provide proof of ownership, which may be uploaded during the registration process or emailed to virtualmeeting@viewproxy.com at the time you register. Because a beneficial owner is not the stockholder of record, you may not vote these shares in person at the Annual Meeting unless you obtain a “legal proxy” from the broker, trustee or nominee that holds your shares, giving you the right to vote the shares at the Annual Meeting. You will then need to upload the legal proxy during the registration process or email the legal proxy to virtualmeeting@viewproxy.com at the time you register to attend the Annual Meeting in order to receive the virtual control number which will allow you to vote your shares at the Annual Meeting.

If you are not a stockholder of record, please understand that we do not know that you are a stockholder or how many shares you own.

Attendance at the Virtual Annual Meeting

The Annual Meeting will be conducted completely online via the internet. Stockholders may attend and participate in the meeting by clicking on the link provided in your invite which will be delivered to you via email following registration. In order to participate in the Annual Meeting, you must register in advance

TABLE OF CONTENTS

at www.viewproxy.com/Repay/2021 by August 16, 2021 at 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time. Upon completing your registration, you will receive further instructions via email, including your unique link and password that will allow you access to the meeting and to submit questions during the meeting.

To access the Annual Meeting, you will need the event password that will be provided after registration. If you are a holder of record and you have misplaced your virtual control number or event password, please call Alliance Advisors at 1-866-612-8937 or e-mail virtualmeeting@viewproxy.com.

Stockholders who participate in the virtual Annual Meeting by way of the website above or the link provided following registration will be considered to have attended the meeting “in person,” as such term is used in this Proxy Statement, including for purposes of determining a quorum and counting votes.

By conducting our Annual Meeting completely online via the internet, we eliminate many of the costs associated with a physical meeting. In addition, we believe that a virtual meeting will provide greater access to those stockholders who want to attend, especially in light of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and related social distancing recommendations, and improve our ability to communicate more effectively with our stockholders during the meeting.

Stockholders as of our record date who attend and participate in our virtual Annual Meeting will have an opportunity to submit questions live via the Internet during a designated portion of the meeting. These stockholders may also submit a question in advance of the Annual Meeting during the registration process, by email to virtualmeeting@viewproxy.com or by telephone at 1-866-612-8937. Only questions that are relevant to the matters presented at the Annual Meeting will be addressed during the Annual Meeting as deemed appropriate. Immediately following the Annual Meeting, we will hold a general Q&A regarding our business and our answers to appropriate questions received and not answered during the meeting will be made available on our investor website at investors.repay.com.

If you have any questions about the Annual Meeting or how to submit or revoke your proxy, or to request an invitation to the Annual Meeting, contact our Corporate Secretary at the Company’s address set forth in the 2021 Notice of Annual Meeting or by calling us at 404-504-7472. If you encounter any difficulties accessing the Annual Meeting during the check-in or meeting time, please contact the technical support at Alliance Advisors at 1-866-612-8937 or e-mail virtualmeeting@viewproxy.com.

Voting Methods

The procedures for voting are as follows:

Stockholder of Record. If you are a stockholder of record, you may vote in person at the virtual Annual Meeting, vote by proxy using a proxy card, vote by proxy over the telephone, or vote by proxy via the internet. Whether or not you plan to attend the virtual Annual Meeting, we urge you to vote by proxy to ensure your vote is counted. You may still attend the virtual Annual Meeting and vote in person, even if you have already voted by proxy. The vote you cast in person will supersede any previous votes that you may have submitted.

•

By Mail: To vote using the proxy card, simply complete, sign and date the proxy card and return it promptly in the envelope provided. If you return your signed proxy card to us before the Annual Meeting, we will vote your shares as you direct.

•

Via the Internet: To vote through the internet, go to www.AALvote.com/RPAY and follow the onscreen instructions. To be counted, your internet vote must be received by 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on August 17, 2021.

•

By Telephone: To vote by telephone, dial toll-free 1-866-804-9616 using a touch-tone phone and follow the recorded instructions. You will be asked to provide the company number and control number from your proxy card or voting instruction form. To be counted, your telephone vote must be received by 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on August 17, 2021.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

•

In Person: To vote in person, attend and vote at the virtual Annual Meeting through the link provided following registration (you will need the virtual control number included on your proxy card to vote during the meeting).

Beneficial Owner. If you are a beneficial owner of shares registered in the name of your broker, trustee, or other nominee, you should have received a notice containing voting instructions from that organization rather than from us. Simply follow the voting instructions in that notice to ensure that your vote is counted. In order to attend the Annual Meeting, you will need to provide proof of ownership, which may be uploaded during the registration process or emailed to virtualmeeting@viewproxy.com at the time you register. Because a beneficial owner is not the stockholder of record, you may not vote these shares in person at the Annual Meeting unless you obtain a “legal proxy” from the broker, trustee or nominee that holds your shares, giving you the right to vote the shares at the Annual Meeting. You will then need to upload the legal proxy during the registration process or email the legal proxy to virtualmeeting@viewproxy.com at the time you register to attend the Annual Meeting in order to receive the virtual control number which will allow you to vote your shares at the Annual Meeting. If you have properly submitted a legal proxy, you may vote at the Annual Meeting while the polls are open (you will need the virtual control number assigned to you in your registration confirmation email to vote during the meeting).

Voting Requirements

At the Annual Meeting, stockholders will consider and act upon (1) the election of two Class II directors for terms expiring at the 2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, (2) the approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers (as defined in this Proxy Statement), (3) the approval, on an advisory basis, of the frequency of future stockholder advisory votes on the compensation of our named executive officers, (4) the ratification of the appointment of Grant Thornton, LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2021; (5) the approval of our 2021 Employee Stock Purchase Plan; and (6) such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting.

With regard to Proposal One (Election of Directors), votes may be cast for the nominees or may be withheld. Each director nominee was recommended by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board, and all nominees are current directors. The election of directors requires a plurality of the votes cast, and the two nominees receiving the greatest number of votes will be elected. Votes that are withheld and broker non-votes are not considered “votes cast” and therefore will have no effect on the outcome of Proposal One.

With regard to Proposal Two (Say-on-Pay Advisory Vote), the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast is required to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers (as defined in this Proxy Statement). Abstentions and broker non-votes, if any, are not treated as votes cast, and therefore will have no effect on the outcome of the vote on this proposal. Because your vote is advisory, it will not be binding on the Company, our Board or our Compensation Committee. However, the Board and the Compensation Committee will consider the outcome of the vote when making future compensation decisions for our executive officers.

With regard to Proposal Three (Say-on-Frequency Advisory Vote), the frequency of the advisory vote on future advisory votes on the compensation of our named executive officers receiving the greatest number of votes cast — one year, two years, or three years — will be deemed by us as the frequency that has been recommended by our stockholders. Abstentions and broker non-votes, if any, are not treated as votes cast, and therefore will have no effect on the outcome of the vote on this proposal. Because your vote is advisory, it will not be binding on the Company, our Board or our Compensation Committee. However, the Board and the Compensation Committee will consider the outcome of the vote when making future decisions regarding the frequency of the advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers.

With regard to Proposal Four (Auditor Ratification), the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast is required to ratify the selection of Grant Thornton LLP (“Grant Thornton”) as our independent registered public accounting firm. Abstentions will have no effect on the results of this vote. Brokerage firms have authority to vote shares held in street name on this proposal without instructions from beneficial owners. As a result, we do not expect there will be any broker non-votes on this matter. We are not required to obtain

TABLE OF CONTENTS

the approval of our stockholders to select our independent registered public accounting firm. However, if our stockholders do not ratify the selection of Grant Thornton as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2021, the Audit Committee of the Board will reconsider its selection.

With regard to Proposal Five (Approval of our 2021 Employee Stock Purchase Plan), the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast is required to approve our 2021 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “ESPP”). Abstentions and broker non-votes, if any, are not treated as votes cast, and therefore will have no effect on the outcome of the vote on this proposal.

Treatment of Voting Instructions

If you provide specific voting instructions, then your shares will be voted as instructed.

If you hold shares as the stockholder of record and submit a proxy without giving specific voting instructions, then your shares will be voted in accordance with the recommendations of our Board. Our Board recommends voting “FOR” all nominees listed in Proposal One, “FOR” the approval of the compensation of our named executive officers in Proposal Two, “ONE YEAR” for the frequency of future advisory votes on the compensation of our named executive officers in Proposal Three, “FOR” the ratification of Grant Thornton as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2021 in Proposal Four, and “FOR” the approval of the ESPP in Proposal Five and in accordance with the discretion of the named proxies on other matters brought before the Annual Meeting.

You may have granted to your broker, trustee, or other nominee discretionary voting authority over your account. Your broker, trustee, or other nominee may be able to vote your shares depending on the terms of the agreement you have with your broker, trustee, or other nominee.

The persons identified as having the authority to vote the proxies also will have discretionary authority to vote, to the extent permitted by applicable law, on such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting and any postponement or adjournment. The Board is not aware of any other matters that are likely to be brought before the Annual Meeting. If any other matter is properly presented for action at the Annual Meeting, including a proposal to adjourn or postpone the Annual Meeting to permit us to solicit additional proxies in favor of any proposal, the persons identified as having the authority to vote the proxies will vote on such matter in their own discretion.

Revocability of Proxies

A stockholder of record who has given a proxy may revoke it at any time prior to its exercise at the Annual Meeting by (i) giving written notice of revocation to our Corporate Secretary, (ii) properly submitting a later proxy via the internet or by telephone, (iii) properly submitting a duly executed proxy bearing a later date, or (iv) voting your shares at the virtual Annual Meeting.

If you are the beneficial owner of shares held through a broker, trustee, or other nominee, then you must follow the specific instructions provided to you by your broker, trustee, or other nominee to change or revoke any instructions you have already provided to your broker, trustee, or other nominee.

Attendance at the Annual Meeting, in and of itself, will not constitute a revocation of a proxy.

Costs of Proxy Solicitation

Repay will bear the expense of preparing this Proxy Statement and soliciting the proxies it is seeking. In addition to the use of the mails, proxies may be solicited by our officers, directors and employees, in person or by telephone, e-mail or facsimile transmission. Our officers, directors and employees will receive no additional compensation for any such solicitations. We also will request brokerage firms, banks, nominees, custodians and fiduciaries to forward proxy materials to the beneficial owners of the underlying shares as of the record date and will reimburse the cost of forwarding the proxy materials in accordance with customary practice. Your cooperation in promptly voting by proxy will help to avoid additional expense.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Loss of Emerging Growth Company Status

Prior to January 1, 2021, we were an “emerging growth company” under applicable federal securities laws and therefore were permitted to take advantage of certain reduced public company reporting requirements. As an emerging growth company, we previously provided scaled disclosure permitted under the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (the “JOBS Act”), including the compensation disclosures required of a “smaller reporting company,” as that term is defined in Rule 12b-2 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). In addition, as an emerging growth company, we were not required to conduct votes seeking approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers or the frequency with which such votes must be conducted.

As of January 1, 2021, we no longer qualified as an emerging growth company and, as a result, are required to conduct a say-on-pay vote and a say-on-pay frequency vote at this Annual Meeting.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROPOSAL ONE:
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Our Board is divided into three classes, each serving staggered, three-year terms:

•

our Class I directors are Shaler Alias, Richard E. Thornburgh and Paul R. Garcia, and their current terms expire at the 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders;

•

our Class II directors are Robert H. Hartheimer, Jeremy Schein and Maryann Goebel, and their current terms expire at this year’s Annual Meeting; and

•

our Class III directors are William Jacobs, Peter J. Kight and John Morris, and their current terms expire at the 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

The Board is currently fixed at nine members divided into three classes. Mr. Schein’s current term expires at this year’s Annual Meeting, and he will not stand for re-election. As a result, the size of the Board will be reduced to eight members, effective immediately following the Annual Meeting.

Action will be taken at the Annual Meeting for the election of two Class II directors. Mr. Hartheimer and Mrs. Goebel, the nominees listed below, are currently directors of the company. Each director elected at the Annual Meeting will serve until the 2024 Annual Meeting or until his successor is elected and qualified. Proxies can be voted for only two nominees.

The Board has no reason to believe that any of the nominees for director will not be available to stand for election as director. However, if some unexpected occurrence should require the substitution by the Board of some other person or persons for any one or more of the nominees, then the proxies may be voted in accordance with the discretion of the named proxies “FOR” such substitute nominees.

The name, age as of the record date, principal occupation for the last five years, selected biographical information and period of service as a director of Repay of the nominees for election as directors and for the continuing directors are set forth below.

Class II Nominees for Election for Terms Expiring at the 2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

Robert H. Hartheimer, age 64, has served as a director since June 2018 (including service as a director of Thunder Bridge through the Business Combination). In December 2019, Mr. Hartheimer became an Organizer and Director Nominee of Monzo US, a subsidiary of a U.K. challenger bank and applicant for a National Bank Charter. Mr. Hartheimer has served as a director and Chairman of the audit committee of Thunder Bridge Capital Partners III Inc. (“Thunder Bridge III”) (NASDAQ: THCPU), a special purpose acquisition company, since February 2021. Mr. Hartheimer has also been an independent director of CardWorks, a privately held consumer lender and credit card servicer since 2017 and currently serves as chairman of its audit committee and its compliance and risk committee. Mr. Hartheimer is the Founder and Managing Member of Hartheimer LLC, which provides senior-level consulting services to banks, investment firms and financial services companies on financial, regulatory, strategic and governance matters, since 2008. From 2015 to 2020, Mr. Hartheimer was Co-Founder and Chief Regulatory Officer of CreditStacks (dba Jasper), a fin-tech credit card originator. From 2002 to 2008, Mr. Hartheimer was a Managing Director at Promontory Financial Group, a regulatory consulting firm. In 1991, Mr. Hartheimer joined the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, where he and a small team created the Division of Resolutions to analyze and sell failed banks. He went on to serve as the Director of that division. Mr. Hartheimer’s other past positions include senior roles at investment banks, including Merrill Lynch, Smith Barney and Friedman Billings Ramsey. Since 1997, Mr. Hartheimer previously served on six corporate boards of directors, including: Thunder Bridge Acquisition II, Ltd. (NASDAQ: THBR), a former special purpose acquisition company, where he served as chairman of the audit committee, from 2019 to June 2021; Lending Club Asset Management, an investment management subsidiary of a fin-tech lending firm, (NYSE: LC) from 2016 to 2019; and, Higher One Holdings, a financial technology company, (NYSE: ONE), where he served as Chairman of the risk committee, from 2012 to 2016. We believe that Mr. Hartheimer is well-qualified to serve on our Board because he brings to it his extensive experience in the financial services industry, the bank regulatory community and investment banking.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Maryann Goebel, age 70, has served as a director since the Business Combination. Ms. Goebel has been an IT management consultant, providing assessments and recommendations regarding IT management and coaching to chief information officers, since July 2012. Ms. Goebel has served as a director of Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida (“Seacoast”) (NASDAQ: SBCF), a bank holding company, since February 2014. She is also a member of Seacoast’s audit committee and enterprise risk management committee and chairs its compensation and governance committee. From June 2009 to July 2012, Ms. Goebel served as Executive Vice President and Chief Information Officer of Fiserv, Inc. (“Fiserv”) (NASDAQ: FISV), where she was responsible for all internal Fiserv IT systems, as well as IT infrastructure, operations, engineering and middleware services for clients who chose to outsource their processing to Fiserv. Ms. Goebel currently serves on the Arts and Sciences Advisory Board of Worcester Polytechnic Institute. In 2017, Ms. Goebel was awarded the CERT Certificate in Cybersecurity Oversight by the NACD. We believe that Ms. Goebel is well-qualified to serve as a member of our Board due to her extensive experience in the information technology industry.

Class I Directors Continuing in Office until the 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

Shaler Alias, age 41, has served as our President and a director since the Business Combination. He co-founded REPAY LLC in 2006 and has served as its President since 2008. From its formation in September 2016 through the Business Combination, Mr. Alias served as a member of the board of directors of Hawk Parent. Mr. Alias has also been a member of the board of directors of Repay Holdings, LLC since its formation in September 2013. Mr. Alias served as Vice President of Sales of REPAY LLC from 2006 to 2008. Prior to 2006, Mr. Alias co-founded and served as Director of Sales and Marketing for Capital Recovery Solutions, a collection agency that served community banks and consumer finance lenders. We believe that Mr. Alias is well-qualified to serve as a member of our Board because of the experience that he brings as a co-founder as well as his knowledge of the payments industry.

Richard E. Thornburgh, age 69, has served as a director since the Business Combination. Since December 2011, Mr. Thornburgh has served as a director of S&P Global, Inc. (NYSE: SPGI), a financial information and analytics company, where he serves as the chair of the board and chair of the executive committee and as a member of the compensation and leadership development committee and the nominating and governance committee. Mr. Thornburgh also serves as the chair of the board of directors of Jackson Hewitt Tax Service Inc., a company that provides assisted tax preparation services and related financial products and which is a portfolio company of Corsair Capital LLC. He has held this position since June 2018. He previously served as a director of Capstar Financial Holdings, Inc., a publicly-traded bank holding company, from December 2008 to December 2019, and Newstar Financial, a commercial finance company, from December 2006 until December 2017, both of which were portfolio companies of Corsair Capital, LLC during his service. In addition, from May 2006 to April 2018, Mr. Thornburgh served on the board of directors of Credit Suisse AG, a publicly traded global financial institution. He served as Vice Chairman of the board, Chair of its risk committee, member of the audit and nominations and governance committees. From 1995 to 2005, he held a variety of executive and other board responsibilities at Credit Suisse Group AG, including Chief Financial Officer and Chief Risk Officer. Mr. Thornburgh was also the Chairman of the board of directors of Credit Suisse Holdings USA from December 2015 to April 2018. Mr. Thornburgh is a Senior Advisor and member of the investment committee of Corsair Capital LLC, which he joined in 2006. He also previously served a director of Reynolds America Inc. from December 2011 until December 2015. We believe Mr. Thornburgh is well-qualified to serve on our Board because of his familiarity with the capital markets and strategic transactions obtained through executive-level positions in investment banking and private equity, as well as his extensive experience in the financial services industry.

Paul R. Garcia, age 69, has served as a director since the Business Combination. Mr. Garcia served as Chairman and CEO of Global Payments Inc. (NYSE:GPN), a leading provider of credit card processing, check authorization and other electronic payment processing services, from June 1999 to May 2014. Mr. Garcia has served as a director of Truist Financial Corp. (NYSE: TFC), a bank holding company, since December 2019 (as well as a director of SunTrust Banks, Inc. (NYSE: STI) from August 2014 through December 2019) and as director The Deluxe Corporation (NYSE: DLX) since August 2020. Mr. Garcia also serves as a director of Payment Alliance International. He previously served on the board of directors of The Dun & Bradstreet Corporation (from May 2012 until February 2019), West Corporation (from

TABLE OF CONTENTS

March 2013 until October 2017) and Global Payments Inc. (from February 2001 until May 2014). We believe that Mr. Garcia is well-qualified to serve as a member of our Board due to his extensive experience in the payment services industry.

Class III Directors Continuing in Office until the 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

William Jacobs, age 79, has served as a director since the Business Combination. From its formation in September 2016 through the Business Combination, Mr. Jacobs served as a member of the board of directors of Hawk Parent. Mr. Jacobs has served as a director of Global Payments Inc. (NYSE: GPN) (“Global Payments”), a payment processing services company, since 2001, and as Chairman of Green Dot Corporation (NYSE: GDOT) (“Green Dot”), a financial services technology company, since June 2016 (and he has served as a director of Green Dot since April 2016). In addition, he currently serves as a member of Global Payments’ governance and nominating committee and compensation committee, served as Lead Independent Director of Global Payments from 2003 to May 2014, served as Chairman of the board of directors of Global Payments from June 2014 to September 2019, and has served as one of its business advisors since August 2002, and previously served on its audit committee and as Chair of its compensation committee. Mr. Jacobs also served as Interim Chief Executive Officer of Green Dot from January 2020 to March 2020. Since March 2021, Mr. Jacobs has also served as a member of the board of directors of Corsair Partnering Corporation, a special purpose acquisition company sponsored by an affiliate of Corsair Capital LLC. He previously served on the boards of directors of Asset Acceptance Capital Corp., a publicly-traded debt collection company, from 2004 to June 2013, when that company merged with Encore Capital Group, Inc. He also served as a member of the board of directors of Investment Technology Group, Inc., a publicly-traded electronic trading resources company, from June 1994 to March 2008, Alpharma, Inc., a publicly-traded specialty pharmaceutical company, from May 2002 to May 2006, and as a member of the Board of Trustees of The American University in Washington, D.C. from 1985 to 2001, of which he served as Chairman from 1997 to 2001. From 1995 to 2000, Mr. Jacobs served in various senior roles at MasterCard International, including as Senior Executive Vice President. Before joining MasterCard International, Mr. Jacobs co-founded Financial Security Assurance Inc. (FSA), where he served as Chief Operating Officer. Mr. Jacobs has served as an operating partner of Corsair Capital LLC since 2018. We believe Mr. Jacobs is well-qualified to serve on our Board based on his management experience and expertise in the payments and financial services industries.

Peter “Pete” J. Kight, age 65, has been the Chairman of our Board since the Business Combination and previously served as the Executive Chairman of Thunder Bridge since June 2018. Mr. Kight has 34 years of industry experience. He has been an Angel Investor and Advisor to Commerce Ventures, a Silicon Valley based venture capital firm focused on investing in innovations in the retail and financial services industries, since 2012. Mr. Kight previously served as a Co-Chairman and Managing Partner at Comvest Partners, a mid-market private investment firm, from 2010 — 2013, and then as a Senior Advisor at Comvest Partners from 2013 to 2015. He was the Founder, Chairman, and Chief Executive Officer of CheckFree Corporation (NASDAQ: CKFR), a provider of financial services technology, from 1981 until it was acquired by Fiserv (NASDAQ: FISV) in 2007. Mr. Kight then served as director and vice chairman of Fiserv following Fiserv’s acquisition of CheckFree from 2007 to 2012 (Vice Chairman from 2007 to 2010). Mr. Kight has served as a director of Bill.com Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: BILL), a provider of software that digitizes and automates back-office financial operations since May 2019 and as a director of indie Semiconductor, Inc. (NASDAQ: INDI), an Autotech solutions innovator, from June 2021 to present. Mr. Kight previously served on the boards of directors of Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ GS: AKAM), distributor of computing solutions and services, from 2004 to 2012, Manhattan Associates, Inc., (NASDAQ: MANH) a provider of supply chain planning and execution solutions, from 2007 to 2011, Kabbage, Inc., a technology-driven SME lending company, from 2015 to November 2017, Blackbaud, Inc. (NASDAQ: BLKB), a supplier of software and services specifically designed for nonprofit organizations, from 2014 to 2020, and Huntington Bancshares Incorporated (NASDAQ: HBAN), a regional bank holding company, from 2012 to 2020. He has been a Principal of Thunder Bridge Capital, LLC, since 2017. He holds more than a dozen patents and publications for electronic banking and payment systems. We believe that Mr. Kight is well-qualified to serve as a member of our Board due to his extensive financial services, operational, management and investment experience.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

John Morris, age 52, has served as our Chief Executive Officer and a director since the Business Combination. He co-founded REPAY LLC and has served as its Chief Executive Officer since 2010. From its formation in September 2016 through the Business Combination, Mr. Morris served as a member of the board of directors of Hawk Parent. Mr. Morris has also been a member of the board of directors of Repay Holdings, LLC since its formation in September 2013. From 1997 to 2008, Mr. Morris served as President of Security Check Atlanta, a check processing and recovery solutions company, until its acquisition by Payliance, where he served as Executive Vice President of Sales and Marketing prior to commencing his role as Chief Executive Officer of REPAY LLC. From 1994 to 1997, Mr. Morris served in several corporate finance positions for Bass Hotels and Resorts, including Director of Corporate Finance. We believe that Mr. Morris is well-qualified to serve as a member of our Board because of the experience that he brings as a co-founder as well as his over 20 years of experience in the payments industry.

Current Director Not Standing for Re-Election

Jeremy Schein, age 41, has served as a director since the Business Combination. From its formation in September 2016 through the Business Combination, Mr. Schein served as a member of the board of directors of Hawk Parent. Mr. Schein is a Managing Director of Corsair Capital LLC, which he joined in 2001 and where he serves as a member of its investment committee. Since January 2021, Mr. Schein has served as President and as a member of the board of directors of Corsair Partnering Corporation, a special purpose acquisition company sponsored by an affiliate of Corsair Capital LLC. Additionally, Mr. Schein has served as a director of NM Money Holdings Ltd., Jackson Hewitt, Spring Venture Group, LLC, Multi Service Technology Solutions, Inc., Identity Intelligence Group, LLC and Oakbridge Insurance Services LLC, since August 2012, May 2018, July 2018, October 2020, December 2020 and December 2020, respectively, all of which are portfolio companies of Corsair Capital LLC.

The Board recommends a vote “FOR” all nominees
listed in Proposal One for election to serve a three-year term on the Board.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF REPAY

Our executive officers are elected annually and serve at the pleasure of the Board. The following sets forth the name, age as of the record date, position(s) with Repay and selected biographical information for our executive officers. The biographies of Messrs. Morris and Alias are provided above under “Proposal One: Election of Directors.”

Name	Age	Position
John Morris	52	Chief Executive Officer and Co-Founder, Director
Shaler Alias	41	President and Co-Founder, Director
Naomi Barnett	30	Executive Vice President, Human Resources
Tyler B. Dempsey	47	General Counsel
Michael F. Jackson	58	Chief Operating Officer
Jason Kirk	42	Chief Technology Officer
Jacob H. Moore	33	Executive Vice President, Corporate Development and Strategy
Timothy J. Murphy	39	Chief Financial Officer
Susan Perlmutter	57	Chief Revenue Officer

Naomi Barnett has served as our Executive Vice President, Human Resources since March 2021. From January 2020 to March 2021, Ms. Barnett served as Vice President, Human Resources for REPAY LLC. Previously, Ms. Barnett served as Director, Human Resources of REPAY LLC from July 2018 to January 2020. Prior to joining REPAY LLC, Ms. Barnett was Director, Head of Human Resources, for Gold Star Mortgage Financial Group from October 2017 to July 2018. From June 2011 to September 2017, Ms. Barnett served in various human resources roles for Patriot National, Inc., including as Assistant Vice President, Human Resources, from May 2016 to September 2017.

Tyler B. Dempsey has served as our General Counsel since September 2019. Prior to joining us, Mr. Dempsey provided legal counsel and support to REPAY LLC for more than nine years as outside counsel at Troutman Sanders LLP (now Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP), where he served as a Partner since 2008. Prior to joining Troutman Sanders, Mr. Dempsey was an attorney at King & Spalding LLP.

Michael “Mike” F. Jackson has served as Chief Operating Officer since the Business Combination and as Chief Operating Officer of REPAY LLC since October 2016. Prior to joining REPAY LLC, Mr. Jackson served in numerous executive roles for enterprise software and payment service providers, including as Senior Vice President, Business Unit Head Cash Management at D+H Ltd. (now known as Finastra), a global payments and lending technology provider, from January 2014 to June 2016 and as Vice President and the Head of EBPP Business/Community Financial Services for ACI Worldwide, Inc. a provider of electronic payments solutions, from August 2012 to December 2013. Prior to ACI Worldwide, Inc., Mr. Jackson worked for S1 Software Corp., from 2008 to 2012, until it was acquired by ACI Worldwide, Inc. Prior to 2008, he worked for the U.S.-based Regions Financial Corporation, where he was responsible for card and merchant services, internet banking and online products and services as Executive Vice President of Alternative Delivery, and President of the Internet Bank.

Jason Kirk has served as Chief Technology Officer since the Business Combination and as Chief Technology Officer of REPAY LLC since December 2014. Prior to joining REPAY LLC, from May 2001 to December 2014, Mr. Kirk held various positions at CCBill, LLC, a provider of third-party payment processing, including leading a team that developed products and platform relating to card payment processing. In addition, Mr. Kirk served as an NBC Defense Specialist in the United States Marine Corps from August 1997 to May 2001.

Jacob “Jake” H. Moore has served as our Executive Vice President, Corporate Development and Strategy since March 2020. From January 2018 to March 2020, Mr. Moore served as the Head of Corporate Development for REPAY LLC. Previously, Mr. Moore served as Vice President, Corporate Development of REPAY LLC from January 2017 to December 2017. Before joining REPAY LLC, Mr. Moore was a private equity investment professional, serving as a Senior Associate at BlueArc Capital Management from

TABLE OF CONTENTS

May 2016 to January 2017 and as an Associate at Trinity Hunt Partners from March 2012 to June 2014. From 2010 to 2012, Mr. Moore was an investment banker in the Mergers and Acquisitions Group at SunTrust Robinson Humphrey.

Timothy “Tim” J. Murphy has served as our Chief Financial Officer since the Business Combination and as Chief Financial Officer of REPAY LLC since January 2014. Mr. Murphy has been a member of the board of directors of Repay Holdings, LLC since September 2016. He oversees our financial operations including accounting, tax, treasury, financial planning, reporting and investor relations. Prior to joining REPAY LLC, Mr. Murphy served as Director of Corporate Development for Amaya Gaming Group Inc. (now known as The Stars Group Inc.), a Canadian online and mobile gaming and interactive entertainment company, from January 2013 to January 2014. Mr. Murphy previously served as Director of Finance for Cadillac Jack, Inc., a company engaged in the design, development, and supply of electronic gaming machines, from August 2009 to December 2012. Mr. Murphy began his professional career as an investment banker at Credit Suisse.

Susan Perlmutter has served as Chief Revenue Officer since the Business Combination and as Chief Revenue Officer of REPAY LLC since January 2016. Ms. Perlmutter previously served as Chief Revenue Officer at Sigma Payment Solutions, Inc. (“Sigma”), a provider of electronic payment solutions to the automotive finance industry, from October 2012 to January 2016, and joined Repay LLC when it acquired Sigma in January 2016. In connection with its acquisition of Sigma, REPAY LLC agreed to retain Ms. Perlmutter’s services as its Chief Revenue Officer. Prior to Sigma, Ms. Perlmutter held various positions with PAYTEK Solutions, LLC a provider of payment processing services, from February 1995 to February 2011.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

We have established corporate governance practices designed to serve the best interests of Repay and our stockholders. We are in compliance with the current corporate governance requirements imposed by the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and the listing standards of The Nasdaq Stock Market (“Nasdaq”). Our current Code of Ethics, Corporate Governance Guidelines and charters for the standing committees of the Board are available on our investor website at investors.repay.com under the heading “Corporate Governance.”

Set forth below is information regarding the meetings of the Board during 2020, a description of the Board’s standing committees and additional information about our corporate governance policies and procedures.

Committees and Meetings of the Board

Board Composition. Our business affairs are managed under the direction of the Board. The Board currently consists of nine members, seven of whom qualify as independent within the meaning of the independent director guidelines of Nasdaq. The Board voted to reduce the number of directors to eight, effective immediately following the Annual Meeting.

Our Board is divided into three staggered classes of directors. At each annual meeting of its stockholders, a class of directors will be elected for a three-year term to succeed the same class whose term is then expiring.

Our certificate of incorporation provides that our Board will consist of one or more members, and the number of directors may be increased or decreased from time to time by a resolution of our Board provided that the number of directors constituting the whole Board shall not be more than 15. Each director’s term will continue until the election and qualification of his or her successor, or his or her earlier death, resignation, or removal. Any increase or decrease in the number of directors will be distributed among the three classes so that, as nearly as possible, each class will consist of one-third of the total number of directors. This classification of our Board may have the effect of delaying or preventing changes in control of us.

We previously entered into a stockholders agreement with each of Thunder Bridge Acquisition LLC (the “Sponsor”) and Corsair, which agreements have since terminated pursuant to their respective terms, and the Founders’ Stockholders Agreement (as defined in this Proxy Statement) that provide or provided these parties with certain director nomination rights. These agreements are described further in this Proxy Statement under “Related Party Transactions — Transactions with Related Persons — Post-Business Combination Agreements.”

Each of our officers serve at the discretion of our Board and will hold office until his or her successor is duly appointed and qualified or until his or her earlier resignation or removal. There are no family relationships among any of our directors or officers.

Our Board consists of industry veterans and influential leaders in the financial services and payments industries. The table below demonstrates how each of our current directors brings extensive experience, deep industry knowledge, unique expertise and fresh perspective to the Board.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

[MISSING IMAGE: tm2121240d1-tbl_exper4clr.jpg]

Meetings of the Board. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that directors should be prepared for and attend Board meetings and actively participate in Board discussions. The Board met ten times during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020. During that period, each of the incumbent directors attended at least 75% of the aggregate number of meetings held by the Board and by each of the committees on which such director served.

Board Committees. Our Board has an Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and Technology Committee. The composition and responsibilities of each of the committees of our Board is described below. Members will serve on these committees until their resignation or until as otherwise determined by our Board.

Audit Committee. The Audit Committee operates under a written charter, a copy of which is available on our investor website at investors.repay.com under the heading “Corporate Governance.” The committee is responsible for, among other things:

•

selecting a qualified firm to serve as the independent registered public accounting firm to audit our financial statements;

•

helping to ensure the independence and performance of the independent registered public accounting firm;

•

discussing the scope and results of the audit with the independent registered public accounting firm and reviewing, with management and the independent registered public accounting firm, our interim and year-end financial statements;

•

developing procedures for employees to submit concerns anonymously about questionable accounting or audit matters;

•

reviewing our policies on and oversees risk assessment and risk management, including enterprise risk management;

•

reviewing the adequacy and effectiveness of internal control policies and procedures and our disclosure controls and procedures; and

•

approving or, as required, pre-approving, all audit and all permissible non-audit services, other than de minimis non-audit services, to be performed by the independent registered public accounting firm.

The Audit Committee met four times during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020. The current members of the Audit Committee are Paul R. Garcia, Maryann Goebel and Robert H. Hartheimer. Robert H. Hartheimer serves as chairperson of the Audit Committee. Each of the members of our Audit Committee

TABLE OF CONTENTS

satisfy the requirements for independence and financial literacy under the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC and rules of Nasdaq. The Board has determined that Mr. Hartheimer is an “Audit Committee financial expert,” as that term is defined in SEC rules.

Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee operates under a written charter, a copy of which is available on our investor website at investors.repay.com under the heading “Corporate Governance.” The committee is responsible for, among other things:

•

reviewing, approving and determining the compensation of our officers and key employees;

•

reviewing, approving and determining the compensation and benefits, including equity awards, to directors for service on our Board or any committee thereof;

•

administering our equity compensation plans;

•

reviewing, approving and making recommendations to our Board regarding incentive compensation and equity compensation plans; and

•

establishing and reviewing general policies relating to compensation and benefits of our employees.

The Compensation Committee met five times during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020. The current members of the Compensation Committee are Paul R. Garcia, William Jacobs and Jeremy Schein. William Jacobs serves as chairperson of the Compensation Committee. Each of the members of our Compensation Committee meet the requirements for independence under the under the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC and rules of Nasdaq. For more information on the Compensation Committee, see “— Corporate Governance Policies — Consideration and Determination of Executive and Director Compensation.”

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee operates under a written charter, a copy of which is available on our investor website at investors.repay.com under the heading “Corporate Governance.” The committee is responsible for, among other things:

•

identifying, evaluating and selecting, or making recommendations to the Board regarding, nominees for election to the Board and its committees;

•

evaluating the performance of our Board and of individual directors;

•

considering, and making recommendations to our Board regarding, the composition of our Board and its committees;

•

reviewing developments in corporate governance practices;

•

evaluating the adequacy of the corporate governance practices and reporting;

•

reviewing related person transactions; and

•

developing, and making recommendations to our Board regarding, corporate governance guidelines and matters.

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee shall work with the Board to determine periodically, as appropriate, the desired Board qualifications, expertise and characteristics, including such factors as business experience and diversity. In evaluating and determining whether to ultimately recommend a person as a candidate for election as a director, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee evaluates all factors that it deems appropriate, including the number of current directors, the terms of the Stockholder Agreements, as well as the qualifications set forth in our Corporate Governance Guidelines. It also takes into account specific characteristics and expertise that it believes will enhance the diversity of knowledge, expertise, background and personal characteristics of our Board. Each director is expected to be an individual of high character, mature judgment and integrity. In determining whether to recommend a director for re-election, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also considers matters relating to the retirement of members, including term limits or age limits, as well as the director’s past attendance at meetings, participation

TABLE OF CONTENTS

in and contributions to the activities of the Board and Repay and other qualifications and characteristics set forth in the committee’s charter.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may engage a third party to conduct or assist with this evaluation. Ultimately, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee seeks to recommend to our Board those nominees whose specific qualities, experience and expertise will augment the current Board’s composition and whose past experience evidences that they will: (i) dedicate sufficient time, energy and attention to ensure the diligent performance of Board duties; (ii) comply with the duties and responsibilities set forth in our Corporate Governance Guidelines and in our bylaws; (iii) comply with all duties of care, loyalty and confidentiality applicable to them as directors of publicly traded corporations organized in Delaware; and (iv) adhere to our Code of Ethics.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has not adopted a formal policy with regard to the consideration of diversity in identifying director nominees. In determining whether to recommend a director nominee, the committee members consider and discuss diversity, among other factors, with a view toward the needs of the Board as a whole. The committee members generally conceptualize diversity expansively to include, without limitation, concepts such as race, gender, national origin, differences of viewpoint, professional background, education, skill and other individual qualities and attributes that contribute to the total mix of viewpoints and experience represented on the Board. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes that the inclusion of diversity as one of many factors considered in selecting director nominees is consistent with the committee’s goal of creating a Board that best serves the needs of the company and the interests of its stockholders.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will also consider recommendations of qualified nominees by stockholders on a substantially similar basis as it considers other nominees. If any stockholder wishes to recommend candidates directly to our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, such stockholder may do so by sending timely notice to the Secretary and otherwise in accordance with the terms of our bylaws and as described in “Stockholder Proposals” below. Such stockholder’s notice shall set forth certain information about the stockholder giving the notice and the nominee and other representations and certifications as set forth in our bylaws.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee met three times during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020. The current members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are William Jacobs, Peter J. Kight and Richard E. Thornburgh. Peter J. Kight serves as chairperson of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Each of the members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee meet the requirements for independence under the applicable rules of Nasdaq.

Technology Committee. The Technology Committee operates under a written charter, a copy of which is available on our investor website at investors.repay.com under the heading “Corporate Governance.” Under the charter, the committee is responsible for, among other things:

•

managing the risks associated with information technology, information and data security, cybersecurity, data privacy, disaster recovery and business continuity;

•

establishing guidelines, policies, controls and procedures for monitoring and mitigating such technology risks;

•

reviewing technology risk reports with management with respect to corrective actions for deficiencies;

•

evaluating, and making recommendations to our Board regarding, the effectiveness of our risk assessment processes; and

•

reviewing, and making recommendations to our Board regarding, our technology strategy, budget and key initiatives, and our technology position relative to our competitors.

The Technology Committee met four times during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020. The current members of the Technology Committee are Maryann Goebel, Peter J. Kight and Richard E. Thornburgh. Maryann Goebel serves as chairperson of the Technology Committee. Each of the members of our Technology Committee meet the requirements for independence under the under the applicable rules of Nasdaq.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Director Independence

Our Class A common stock is listed on Nasdaq. Under the rules of Nasdaq, independent directors must comprise a majority of a listed company’s board of directors. In addition, the rules of Nasdaq require that, subject to specified exceptions, each member of a listed company’s audit, compensation and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees be independent. Under the rules of Nasdaq, a director will only qualify as an “independent director” if, in the opinion of that company’s board of directors, that person does not have a relationship that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director. Audit Committee members must also satisfy the additional independence criteria set forth in Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act and the rules of Nasdaq. Compensation Committee members must also satisfy the additional independence criteria set forth in Rule 10C-1 under the Exchange Act and the rules of Nasdaq.

In order to be considered independent for purposes of Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act and under the rules of Nasdaq, a member of an audit committee of a listed company may not, other than in his or her capacity as a member of the committee, the board of directors, or any other board committee: (1) accept, directly or indirectly, any consulting, advisory, or other compensatory fee from the listed company or any of its subsidiaries; or (2) be an affiliated person of the listed company or any of its subsidiaries.

To be considered independent for purposes of Rule 10C-1 under the Exchange Act and under the rules of Nasdaq, the board of directors must affirmatively determine that the member of the Compensation Committee is independent, including a consideration of all factors specifically relevant to determining whether the director has a relationship to the company which is material to that director’s ability to be independent from management in connection with the duties of a Compensation Committee member, including, but not limited to: (i) the source of compensation of such director, including any consulting, advisory or other compensatory fee paid by the company to such director; and (ii) whether such director is affiliated with the company, a subsidiary of the company or an affiliate of a subsidiary of the company.

The Board has undertaken a review of the independence of each director and considered whether each director has a material relationship with the Company that could compromise his or her ability to exercise independent judgment in carrying out his or her responsibilities. As a result of this review, the Board has determined that Ms. Goebel and Messrs. Hartheimer, Jacobs, Thornburgh, Kight and Garcia are “independent directors” as defined under the listing requirements and rules of Nasdaq and the applicable rules of the Exchange Act. Messrs. Morris and Alias are not considered independent.

Corporate Governance Policies

In addition to corporate governance matters described throughout this Proxy Statement, some additional information about our corporate governance policies and procedures is set forth below:

Code of Ethics. Our Code of Ethics, which we refer to as the “Code of Ethics,” applies to all of our directors, officers and employees. The Code of Ethics is available on our investor website at investors.repay.com under the heading “Corporate Governance.” We intend to post any amendments to or any waivers from a provision of our Code of Ethics on our website.

Corporate Governance Guidelines. Our Board adopted the Repay Corporate Governance Guidelines, which give effect to Nasdaq’s requirements related to corporate governance and various other corporate governance matters. The Corporate Governance Guidelines reflect the Board’s commitment to effective corporate governance of Repay, with a view to enhancing long-term stockholder value. Topics addressed in the Corporate Governance Guidelines include:

•

role and responsibility of the Board;

•

independence of the Board;

•

director qualifications;

•

committees of the Board;

•

director orientation and continuing education;

TABLE OF CONTENTS

•

expectations of directors;

•

limitations on other board service;

•

management succession planning;

•

evaluation of Board performance; and

•

communications with stockholders.

A copy of the Corporate Governance Guidelines is available on our investor website at investors.repay.com under the heading “Corporate Governance.”

Risk Management. Our management is responsible for day-to-day risk management of the company, subject to oversight by the Board and its committees with regard to the major risks inherent in our business, including strategic, regulatory, compliance, operational, financial, reputational and cybersecurity risks, and the efforts of management to address and mitigate such risks.

The Board and its committees maintain an active role in risk oversight. The Board receives regular reports concerning our risk assessment and risk management from the Audit Committee, which meets periodically with our independent auditors, with our General Counsel and with management, to discuss the Company’s major financial risk exposures and the steps that management has taken to monitor and control such exposures. In addition to receiving regular reports from the Audit Committee related to financial risk exposures, the Board also reviews information regarding other risks through regular reports of its other committees, including information regarding compensation related risk from the Compensation Committee, governance related risk from the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and cybersecurity related risk from the Technology Committee.

We believe the division of risk management responsibilities described above is an effective approach for addressing the risks that we face.

Executive Sessions of Independent Directors. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that the independent directors shall meet in executive session on a periodic basis but no less than twice per year. At executive sessions, our independent directors meet without management or any affiliated directors present. The Board believes that executive sessions foster free and open communication among the independent directors, which will ultimately add to the effectiveness of the Board, as a whole.

Consideration and Determination of Executive and Director Compensation. The Compensation Committee has the primary authority to determine our compensation philosophy and to establish compensation for our executive officers. In establishing executive officer compensation, the Compensation Committee uses its subjective evaluation of the executives’ performance and responsibilities, our overall performance and the Chief Executive Officer’s recommendations. In addition, the Compensation Committee has engaged an independent compensation consultant to advise regarding the status of Repay’s executive officer compensation in relation to comparable companies.

Management plays a significant role in the executive compensation-setting process. The most significant aspects of management’s role are:

•

evaluating employee performance;

•

preparing information for Compensation Committee meetings;

•

establishing business performance targets and objectives;

•

providing background information regarding our strategic objectives; and

•

recommending salary levels and equity awards.

From time to time, the Compensation Committee may invite to its meetings any director, member of management and such other persons as it deems appropriate in order to carry out its responsibilities. Typically, Mr. Morris reviews the performance of senior management and make recommendations on compensation levels, and Mr. Dempsey advises the Compensation Committee on legal matters and prepares documents for the Compensation Committee’s consideration. In addition, these officers answer questions

TABLE OF CONTENTS

posed by the committee. Also, the Board has delegated authority to Repay’s Chief Executive Officer to grant equity awards to employees other than executive officers, subject to certain parameters.

Under our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the compensation of independent directors is determined by the Board upon recommendation of the Compensation Committee. The guidelines further provide that non-employee directors are expected to receive a meaningful portion of their annual retainer in the form of equity. Employee directors are not paid additional compensation for their services as directors.

Restrictions on Short Sales or Speculative Transactions by All Directors and Employees. The Board believes that it is undesirable for our directors, officers and employees to engage in hedging or speculative transactions that may put the personal gain of the insider in conflict with the best interests of the Company and our securityholders or otherwise give the appearance of impropriety. Therefore, we adopted an insider trading policy, which generally prohibits our directors, officers, and employees, whether or not in possession of material non-public information from (i) trading in options, warrants, puts and calls or similar instruments on our securities, and (ii) selling our securities “short” (i.e., selling stock that is not owned and borrowing the shares to make delivery).

In addition, our insider trading policy discourages margin accounts and pledges. The policy generally prohibits our directors, officers, and employees, whether or not in possession of material non-public information, from purchasing our securities on margin, borrowing against any account in which our securities are held or pledging our securities as collateral for a loan, without first obtaining pre-clearance.

Under the insider trading policy, our executive officers may only trade our securities during certain designated periods, as set out in our insider trading policy, and must obtain pre-clearance and approval prior to any transaction. All executive officers and directors are in compliance with this policy.

Committee Authority to Retain Independent Advisors. The charter of each of the Audit Committee, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Technology Committee provides that the committee has the authority to retain independent advisors, counsel, experts and consultants, with all fees and expenses paid by Repay.

Board Leadership Structure. Our current Board leadership structure separates the positions of Chief Executive Officer and Chairperson of the Board, although we do not have a corporate policy requiring that structure. The Board believes that this separation is appropriate for the Company at this time because it allows for a division of responsibilities and a sharing of ideas between individuals having different perspectives. Our Chief Executive Officer, who is also a member of our Board, is primarily responsible for our operations and strategic direction, while our Board Chairperson, who is an independent member of the Board, is primarily focused on matters pertaining to corporate governance, including management oversight and strategic guidance. The Board believes that this is the most appropriate structure at this time but will make future determinations regarding whether or not to separate the roles of Chair and Chief Executive Officer based on then-current circumstances.

Under our Corporate Governance Guidelines, when the Chairperson of the Board is also the Chief Executive Officer or is a director who does not otherwise qualify as an “independent director,” a “Lead Director” shall be elected annually by plurality vote of the independent directors, pursuant to a secret ballot, following nomination by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The Lead Director would help coordinate efforts of the independent and non-management directors in the interest of ensuring that objective judgment is brought to bear on sensitive issues involving the management of the Company and, in particular, the performance of senior management. A description of the position of Lead Director is set forth in Annex A to our Corporate Governance Guidelines, which is available on our investor website at investors.repay.com under the heading “Corporate Governance.” Currently, John Morris serves as our Chief Executive Officer, and the independent Chairman position is held by Peter J. Kight. Therefore, we do not currently have a Lead Director. We believe that the structure of our Board and its committees provides strong overall management of the Company.

Policy for Director Attendance at Annual Meetings. Under our Corporate Governance Guidelines, each director is strongly encouraged to attend each Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Process for Stockholders to Send Communications to the Board. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that any stockholder who wishes to communicate with, or otherwise make his or her concerns known directly to the chairperson of any of the committees, or to the non-management or independent directors as a group, may do so by (1) addressing such communications or concerns to the Secretary of the Company, 3 West Paces Ferry Road, Suite 200, Atlanta, Georgia 30305, who will forward such communications to the appropriate party, or (2) sending an e-mail to corpsecretary@repay.com. Such communications may be done confidentially or anonymously.

Environmental, Social and Governance Matters

We believe corporate responsibility is deeply woven into our company culture and good governance at all levels provides a strong foundation for supporting and promoting the long-term interests of our shareholders. Our environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) initiatives have been guided by our desire to achieve operational excellence, generate long-term value for our shareholders, provide a good working environment for our employees and have a positive impact in our communities.

In 2020, we created a sustainability working group, consisting of internal and external resources, to assess the ESG factors related to our business. Together with the Board and our executive management team, the working group analyzed our business and identified relevant ESG factors for evaluation and disclosure. The analysis included dialogue with certain of our institutional stockholders and review of the practices of our peer companies. In March 2021, we publicly released our inaugural Corporate Sustainability Report, which discusses our environmental and social responsibility and sustainability programs and practices. This report focuses on environmental initiatives, social initiatives and governance initiatives. A copy of our Corporate Sustainability Report is available on the “Investors” page of our website, www.repay.com, under the “Corporate Governance” tab.

We will continue to evolve our ESG program in a manner that is beneficial to the Company and our stakeholders.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

REPORT OF AUDIT COMMITTEE

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in any of Repay’s filings under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), or the Exchange Act that might incorporate by reference this Proxy Statement, in whole or in part, the following report shall not be incorporated by reference into any such filings.

The Audit Committee oversees our financial reporting process on behalf of the Board. The Audit Committee operates under a written charter, a copy of which is available on the “Investors” page of our website, www.repay.com, under the “Corporate Governance” tab. This report reviews the actions taken by the Audit Committee with regard to our financial reporting process during fiscal 2020 and particularly with regard to the audited consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019 and for the three years ended December 31, 2020.

The Audit Committee is composed solely of independent directors. None of the committee members is or has been an officer or employee of the Company or any of our subsidiaries or has any current business or any family relationship with the Company or any of our subsidiaries or affiliates.

Our management has the primary responsibility for the financial statements and reporting process, including the systems of internal controls. The independent auditors are responsible for performing an independent audit of our consolidated financial statements in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States and issuing a report thereon. The Audit Committee’s responsibility is to monitor and oversee these processes and to select annually the accountants to serve as our independent auditors for the coming year.

The Audit Committee has implemented procedures to ensure that during the course of each fiscal year it devotes the attention that it deems necessary or appropriate to fulfill its oversight responsibilities under the Audit Committee’s charter. To carry out its responsibilities, the Audit Committee met four times during the year ended December 31, 2020.

In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the Audit Committee reviewed and discussed with management the audited consolidated financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020, including a discussion of the quality, rather than just the acceptability, of the accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant judgments and the clarity of disclosures in the financial statements.

The Audit Committee also discussed with the independent auditors, who are responsible for expressing an opinion on the conformity of those audited consolidated financial statements with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, their judgments as to the quality, rather than just the acceptability, of our accounting principles and such other matters as are required to be discussed with the Audit Committee under the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) and the SEC. The Audit Committee also reviewed and discussed with the independent auditors the critical audit matters arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the Audit Committee and that (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements, and (2) involved the auditor’s especially challenging, subjective or complex judgments. In addition, the Audit Committee discussed with the auditors their independence from management and the Company, including the matters in the written disclosures and the letter required by the PCAOB regarding the independent auditors’ communications with the Audit Committee regarding independence. The Audit Committee also considered whether the provision of services during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020 by the auditors that were unrelated to their audit of the consolidated financial statements referred to above and to their reviews of our interim consolidated financial statements during the fiscal year is compatible with maintaining their independence.

Additionally, the Audit Committee discussed with the independent auditors the overall scope and plan for their audit. The Audit Committee met with the independent auditors, with and without management present, to discuss the results of their examination, their evaluation of our internal controls and the overall quality of our financial reporting.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

In reliance on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board that the audited consolidated financial statements be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020 for filing with the SEC.

Submitted by the Audit Committee:

Robert H. Hartheimer, Chairman
Paul R. Garcia
Maryann Goebel

TABLE OF CONTENTS

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) outlines our compensation programs, practices and objectives for our 2020 named executive officers (“NEOs”) listed below and discusses how the compensation committee of the Board (the “Compensation Committee”) arrived at the compensation decisions for 2020.

Name			Title
John Morris			Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”)
Shaler Alias			President
Timothy J. Murphy			Chief Financial Officer
Tyler B. Dempsey			General Counsel
Michael F. Jackson			Chief Operating Officer

Executive Summary

2020 Business Highlights

We made significant progress and experienced strong business and financial performance during the year ended December 31, 2020. In addition to the strong financial results, we completed three acquisitions in 2020 and improved our liquidity position. Highlights related to our financial condition and results of operations as of December 31, 2020 include:

•

Card payment volume was $15.2 billion, an increase of 42% over the full year 2019

•

Total revenue was $155.0 million, a 48% increase over the full year 2019

•

Gross profit was $113.6 million, an increase of 44% over the full year 2019

•

Adjusted EBITDA was $68.2 million, an increase of 41% over the full year 2019

•

Adjusted Net Income was $43.7 million, an increase of 11% over the full year 2019

•

Adjusted Net Income per share was $0.60

Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted Net Income and Adjusted Net Income per share are non-GAAP financial measures. Please refer to p. 31 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended, for reconciliations to GAAP measures and further information.

COVID-19 Response

Similar to many companies, we experienced uncertainty and adverse financial impacts in 2020 related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Although we experienced increased demand for some of our service offerings as a result of an accelerated shift to electronic payments, we believe that the COVID-19 pandemic, the mitigation efforts and the resulting economic impact have had, and may continue to have, an overall adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

The 2020 Adjusted EBITDA performance goals discussed below were established in early March 2020 prior to any meaningful understanding of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and the related mitigation measures on the Company’s results of operations. Notwithstanding the pandemic’s effect on the Company’s performance, after careful consideration, the Compensation Committee determined not to modify the performance goals that were established prior to the onset of COVID-19 for outstanding performance awards, and payouts under the 2020 AIP described below were below target.

2020 Pay Mix and Target Total Compensation

The Compensation Committee strives to align our compensation program with short- and long-term Company performance objectives and stockholder value. We believe that our current executive compensation program emphasizes performance-based pay and reflects best practices to ensure sound corporate

TABLE OF CONTENTS

governance. The following charts show the mix of total target compensation in 2020 for our CEO and the average of all other NEOs.

[MISSING IMAGE: tm2121240d1-pc_ceoneo4clr.jpg]

While aiming for a pay mix focused on variable and performance-based vehicles and designed to attract, retain and motivate our NEOs, and following a review of peer companies and executive performance, the Compensation Committee approved executive pay at the following target levels for 2020:

Name	Base Salary ($)		% of Total		Target Short- Term Cash Incentive ($)		% of Total		Target Long- Term Equity Incentives ($)		% of Total		Total
John Morris		355,000		8%		177,500		4%		3,906,250		88%		4,438,750
Shaler Alias		314,150		25%		157,075		12%		794,500		63%		1,265,725
Timothy J. Murphy		283,250		16%		212,438		12%		1,261,000		72%		1,756,688
Tyler B. Dempsey		350,000		25%		175,000		13%		844,167		62%		1,369,167
Michael F. Jackson		249,260		21%		274,630		23%		651,610		56%		1,175,500

Greater detail regarding the compensation of our NEOs can be found within the 2020 Summary Compensation Table.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Objectives of the Compensation Program

Our executive compensation program encompasses the overarching ideals of the Company as a whole. We value performance driven metrics and an astute workforce. The Compensation Committee believes this is best effectuated by designing compensation programs and policies to achieve the following primary objectives:

•

attract, retain and motivate our highly-talented executive team;

•

align the objectives and interests of our executives with those of our stockholders in order to increase overall value and output within the Company; and

•

promote the achievement of key financial and strategic milestones.

Attract and Retain Talented Executive Team

We operate in a highly competitive industry for talented executives. The Compensation Committee has designed our compensation program to attract, retain and motivate an executive team capable of maximizing the Company’s performance in both the short- and long-term. With our compensation program and policies, we aim to provide our NEOs with a total compensation package that is competitive with comparable positions at other companies with which we compete for talent.

Align Interests of Named Executive Officers and Stockholders

The following compensation policies and practices are designed to align the interests of our NEOs and our stockholders:

What We Do

What We Don’t Do

Heavy emphasis on variable and performance-based compensation

Engage an independent compensation consultant

No significant perquisites

Stock ownership guidelines

Fully independent compensation committee

No incentives that encourage excessive risk-taking

Anti-hedging/pledging policy

Capped annual and long-term incentive programs

No tax gross ups

Mix of short-term and long-term incentives and performance metrics

Clawback policy

No guaranteed incentive payments

Annual risk assessments

Promote the Achievement of Key Milestones

The Compensation Committee believes compensation should be linked to actual performance and individual contributions. The Compensation Committee has worked to create an environment where performance is expected and rewarded. Our compensation program is designed to provide significant performance-based compensation, including cash and equity compensation that is variable and based on our actual results and our executives’ individual performance, as compared to fixed or guaranteed compensation.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Material Elements of Our Compensation Programs

Our compensation philosophy is supported by the following material compensation elements, which the Compensation Committee uses in determining the compensation of our NEOs:

Compensation Element	How It’s Paid	Purpose
Base Salary	Cash (Fixed)	Provides a competitive fixed compensation relative to similar positions in the market and enables us to attract and retain highly skilled executive talent
Annual Cash Incentive Awards	Cash (Variable)	Focuses executives on achieving annual financial and strategic goals that promote growth, profitability and returns, ultimately driving long-term stockholder value
Long-Term Incentive Plan	Equity (Variable)	Provides incentives for executives to reach long-term financial and strategic goals that drive stockholder value creation

Base Salary

Base salary generally provides an annual fixed compensation for our executives for the services they render during the year and is a standard element of compensation necessary to attract and retain high-level executive talent. All NEO employment arrangements require an annual review of base salary by the Compensation Committee, and annual increases may be made by the Compensation Committee on a discretionary basis. In making base salary decisions, the Compensation Committee does not use a specific formula for evaluating the individual performance of each NEO. When reviewing base salaries as part of the total target compensation, the Compensation Committee considers, among other factors, our contractual obligations under each NEO’s employment agreement, their respective role and responsibilities, their experience and contributions to our financial and operational success, the competitiveness of each NEO’s pay opportunity based on market data, and the totality of the executive’s individual performance.

Annual Performance-Based Cash Incentive Awards

Annual performance-based cash incentive awards are awarded under the Annual Incentive Plan (“AIP”). These awards are designed to encourage the achievement of various pre-determined financial performance goals for the Company and personal and department performance goals tied to each of the NEO’s roles at the Company. The design of the AIP provides that each NEO’s cash incentive opportunity will be expressed as a percentage of his base salary and earned based on performance results as compared to pre-established threshold, target and maximum goals. NEOs participate in the AIP at individual target levels set forth in their respective employment agreements, which currently range from 50% to 75% of base salary.

Annual Performance-Based and Service-Based Equity Awards

Equity awards are a significant component of our NEO compensation. Under the terms of our Omnibus Incentive Plan, effective as of July 11, 2019 (the “2019 Plan”), the Compensation Committee has the authority to annually grant equity to our NEOs, which it has done since the Business Combination. The 2019 Plan is intended to recognize the contributions made to the Company by our employees and directors, to provide such persons with additional incentive to devote themselves to our future success, and to improve our ability to attract, retain, and motivate individuals upon whom our sustained growth and financial success depend, by providing such persons with an opportunity to acquire or increase their proprietary interest in the Company.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

In approving long-term equity incentives as part of the total target compensation, the Compensation Committee focuses on the nature of the NEO’s services and responsibilities, the NEO’s present and potential contribution to the Company’s success and such other factors it may deem relevant. The Compensation Committee also believes that linking the personal financial interests of our NEOs to the Company’s long-term performance discourages excessive risk taking and supports creation of sustainable stockholder value.

We typically grant annual equity awards to the NEOs at the regularly-scheduled meeting of the Compensation Committee held in the first quarter of the fiscal year to align the timing close to the annual performance evaluations of NEOs. The date of such meeting is set up approximately a year in advance and coincides with the Board’s review of year-end financial results. The grant date of the equity awards is the date such award is approved by the Compensation Committee. Equity awards may also be made by the Compensation Committee from time to time to incentivize and reward certain performance and to provide additional retention value.

Process for Determining Named Executive Officers’ Compensation

Role of Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee is comprised of independent, non-employee members of the Board and has the primary authority to determine our compensation philosophy and establish the compensation of our NEOs. In establishing our NEOs’ compensation, the Compensation Committee uses its subjective evaluation of the executives’ performance and responsibilities, our overall performance and the CEO’s recommendations with respect to the other NEOs. The Compensation Committee’s specific authority and responsibilities are set forth in its charter, a copy of which is available on the “Investors” page of our website, www.repay.com.

The Compensation Committee has also engaged an independent compensation consultant to advise the Compensation Committee regarding the status of our NEOs’ compensation in relation to comparable companies. The Compensation Committee works very closely with its independent compensation consultant and management to evaluate the effectiveness of our executive compensation program throughout the year.

Role of Management

Management plays a significant role in the process of establishing executive compensation. The most significant aspects of management’s role are:

•

CEO evaluation of employee performance (other than for the CEO);

•

preparing information for Compensation Committee meetings;

•

recommending business performance targets and objectives;

•

providing background information regarding our strategic objectives; and

•

recommending salary levels and equity awards.

From time to time, the Compensation Committee may invite any director, member of management and such other persons as it deems appropriate to its meetings in order to carry out its responsibilities. Typically, our CEO reviews the performance of senior management and makes recommendations on compensation levels, and our General Counsel advises the committee on legal matters and prepares documents for the Compensation Committee’s consideration. Also, our Executive Vice President — Human Resources provides the Compensation Committee with details with respect to the operation of our various compensation and benefit plans. The CEO presents to the Compensation Committee the individual goals for the NEOs (other than the CEO) and an analysis of the achievement of those goals. In addition, these officers answer questions posed by the Compensation Committee. Also, the Board has delegated authority to our CEO to grant equity awards to employees other than executive officers, subject to certain parameters.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The CEO recommends to the Compensation Committee annual base salaries, annual performance-based cash incentive awards and long-term or performance equity grants for the NEOs (other than the CEO). The Compensation Committee then evaluates each NEO, sets performance criteria for annual performance-based cash incentive awards, and makes long-term equity grants, if any. Although the Compensation Committee considers the CEO’s recommendations, the final decisions regarding base salary, annual incentive awards and equity awards of the NEOs are within the sole discretion of the Compensation Committee.

Role of the Independent Compensation Consultant

The Compensation Committee has the authority to retain independent compensation consultants to provide counsel and advice. For 2020, the Compensation Committee retained Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc. (“FW Cook”) as its independent advisor on executive and non-employee director compensation matters. FW Cook reports directly to the Compensation Committee and does not provide any other services to the Company. The Compensation Committee assessed the independence of FW Cook in 2020 and whether any work provided by FW Cook raises any conflict of interest, taking into consideration the independence factors set forth in applicable SEC and Nasdaq rules, and determined that FW Cook was independent.

As the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant, FW Cook generally reviews and evaluates our executive compensation programs. FW Cook considers the objectives of our compensation programs and compares them to peer group companies (as discussed below) and best practices and consults the Compensation Committee on competitive compensation practices and trends. The Compensation Committee pre-approves any services to be provided by FW Cook. FW Cook assisted the Compensation Committee in establishing our compensation philosophy, determining our peer group and determining appropriate levels of compensation for our NEOs in 2020.

Peer Group Analysis

The Compensation Committee regularly reviews benchmarking and market surveys in order to ensure that our compensation is competitive with that of our peers. The Compensation Committee also considers analysis and surveys by third parties for comparative purposes in order to gain a better understanding of compensation practices and trends in the market.

Our compensation consultant provides the Compensation Committee with general market surveys and other information related to the general market for executive compensation, including best practices and emerging trends. Additionally, in 2020, FW Cook provided information derived from the proxy statements of our peer group of 14 companies, which includes publicly traded companies providing financial technology products and services with similar revenues, earnings and/or market capitalizations. FW Cook also referred to another industry survey covering the broader technology industry as an additional market resource. The peer companies referred to for evaluation of our 2020 NEO compensation included the following:

ACI Worldwide, Inc.
Bill.com Holdings, Inc.
Bottomline Technologies (de), Inc.
Cass Information Systems, Inc.
Everi Holdings Inc.

EVERTEC Inc.
EVO Payments, Inc.
Green Dot Corporation
GreenSky, Inc.
i3 Verticals, Inc.

International Money Express, Inc.
Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.
Q2 Holdings, Inc.
Verra Mobility Corporation

The Compensation Committee reviewed compensation information from this peer group by comparable executive position and level to better understand the market for other participants for all aspects of compensation. In a review of the applicable data, the Compensation Committee sought to ensure that the overall compensation to our NEOs was competitive with industry standards and median compensation levels at other companies of similar characteristics based on the executive’s position, level and job performance. The Compensation Committee took this evaluation into account in determining all elements of NEO compensation for 2020.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Named Executive Officers’ Compensation in 2020

Base Salary

Base salary represents annual fixed compensation and provides our NEOs with a level of compensation consistent with their experience, responsibilities and contributions in relation to comparable positions in the marketplace. The Compensation Committee met in March of 2020 to determine the base salaries for our NEOs for 2020 and approved modest increases in certain of the NEOs’ annual salaries as set forth in the table below to maintain current alignment with the market.

Base salaries for our NEOs at the end of fiscal 2020, compared to their base salaries in effect at the end of fiscal 2019, are set forth below:

Name	2020 Base Salary ($)		2019 Base Salary ($)		% Change
John Morris		355,000		355,000		0%
Shaler Alias		314,150		305,000		3%
Timothy J. Murphy		283,250		275,000		3%
Tyler B. Dempsey		350,000		350,000(1)		0%
Michael F. Jackson		249,260		242,000		3%

(1)

Mr. Dempsey began employment with the Company in September 2019. Amount reflects annualized base salary.

Annual Performance-Based Cash Incentives

For 2020, our NEOs were entitled under their employment agreements to participate in the AIP with the following targets, expressed as a percentage of base salary: Mr. Morris, 50%; Mr. Alias, 50%; Mr. Murphy, 75%; Mr. Dempsey, 50%; and Mr. Jackson, 50%. Mr. Jackson’s AIP target was increased from 25% to 50% for 2020 to more closely align with peer market data and as determined appropriate given Mr. Jackson’s significant duties and responsibilities. The AIP targets for the other NEOs remained consistent with the target levels for those individuals in 2019.

The Compensation Committee establishes AIP targets during the first quarter of the fiscal year. Individual performance results are also factored into the AIP opportunity. For fiscal year 2020, the Compensation Committee established the performance goals under AIP as (i) a financial goal of Adjusted EBITDA (weighted at 75%) and (ii) an individual goal (weighted at 25%) to provide for appropriate annual incentives to management. For 2020, the Compensation Committee established an Adjusted EBITDA target of $70.0 million, with a threshold of $66.0 million (94% of the target) and a maximum of $75.2 million (107% of the target). If actual Adjusted EBITDA performance does not meet the threshold, no award will be earned for the financial goal. If the actual Adjusted EBITDA performance reaches the threshold, the award earned for the financial goal will be 50% of the target. The award earned for results between the threshold and the target and between the target and the maximum of 200% of the target is calculated using straight-line interpolation. The maximum incentive award for any NEO is 200% of his target bonus. The 2020 Adjusted EBITDA performance goals were established in early March 2020 prior to any meaningful understanding of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and the related mitigation measures on the Company’s results of operations.

The Compensation Committee does not use a specific formula for evaluating the individual performance of each NEO. The Compensation Committee makes each assessment taking into consideration the quality and effectiveness of each NEO’s leadership and their respective contribution to Repay’s financial and operational success, as well as the totality of the executive’s performance. In evaluating the individual performance of the NEOs for 2020, the Compensation Committee considered the individual achievements of each NEO, including the following, among others:

John Morris

•

Led the executive team to a successful 2020, including completion of acquisitions of Ventanex, cPayPlus and CPS Payment Services and addition of meaningful new software partners

TABLE OF CONTENTS

•

Oversaw hiring of critical new internal positions to support the Company’s growth

•

Completed first follow-on public offering for $184 million

•

Executed COVID response planning and reporting, including overnight response to move employees to a virtual work setting, improving related security measures and implementing a CEO dashboard

•

Completed $345 million registered block trade resulting in successful full exit of Corsair’s equity position in Repay

•

Developed 5-year strategy for Repay, including finalizing a comprehensive B2B strategy

•

Stock price increased approximately 86% over the calendar year

•

Repay was added to the US Small-Cap Russell 2000 Index

Shaler Alias

•

Successfully negotiated favorable pricing and incentives relating to various payment network and sponsor bank relationships

•

Successfully negotiated contract extensions on key customer contracts

•

Negotiated agreements with new customers, including “buy-now-pay-later” merchants

•

Obtained Instant Funding bank sponsorship in Canada

•

Expanded offerings of Instant Funding for additional U.S. lender customers

•

Monitored and managed risk reviews for TriSource clients

•

Supported effort to convert APS to TriSource for back-end processing and led associated negotiations with TSYS

•

Oversaw reconciliation reporting for gateway transactions

Timothy J. Murphy

•

Completed first full year of public company reporting obligations, including leading the earnings release process and related analyst calls

•

Added coverage from five new research analysts

•

Amended and upsized credit facility

•

Completed first follow-on public offering for $184 million

•

Executed COVID response planning

•

Completed $345 million registered block trade resulting in successful full exit of Corsair’s equity position in Repay

•

Completed over 160 investor meetings and calls, interacting with over 380 investors, and attended 18 investor conferences and events

•

Coordinated with audit committee chair to prepare materials for audit committee meetings and led management presentations to the same

•

Coordinated with internal audit team and Grant Thornton on implementation of internal controls

•

Grew internal team across accounting, tax, FP&A and corporate development

Tyler B. Dempsey

•

Managed legal due diligence and transaction documentation for acquisitions of Ventanex, cPayPlus and CPS Payment Services

•

Oversaw legal aspects of $184 million first follow-on offering

•

Oversaw legal aspects of $345 million block trade (structured as synthetic secondary to purchase all of Corsair’s equity stake)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

•

Led preparation of first proxy statement and conduct of first annual stockholders’ meeting (in all-virtual format)

•

Structured and administered first annual self-evaluation process for the Board and its committees

•

Established framework for Board oversight of merchant regulatory compliance matters

•

Grew internal legal team and organized legal department along business unit lines

•

Led legal aspects of forced exercise and redemption of outstanding warrants

Michael F. Jackson

•

Completed integration activities for TriSource, APS and Ventanex acquisitions

•

Managed significant employee growth through onboarding of new employees and internal promotions

•

Achieved the recognition of “Certified Great Place to Work” for the 4th consecutive year based on objective and anonymous employee feedback

•

Spearheaded COVID-19 internal employee readiness plan and vendor and business continuity plans and communications

•

Implemented the CEO dashboard to provide more timely volume information for pandemic-related reporting

•

Planned and executed the APS back-end migration from TSYS to TriSource

•

Implemented new quality initiative and measurement tools for the internal underwriting department

•

Oversaw completion of 2020 Nacha ACH audit with no findings

For 2020, Adjusted EBITDA was $68.2 million (resulting in a payout of 75% of the target for that objective) and the Compensation Committee determined the performance objectives based on achievement of individual performance goals was at 100% for each NEO. In determining the achievement of individual performance goals, in addition to the matters summarized above, the Compensation Committee considered the strong performance of the Company in an especially challenging environment. As a result, the Compensation Committee approved awards under the AIP for 2020 to be granted at 81% of target for each NEO.

Performance Objective:	Adjusted EBITDA	Individual Performance
Weighting among performance objectives:	75%	25%
Threshold	$66.0 million	25%
Target	$70.0 million	100%
Maximum	$75.2 million	200%
% Achieved for 2020:	75%	100%
Overall payout for 2020:	81%

Notwithstanding the establishment of the performance components and the formula for determining the AIP awards as described above, the Compensation Committee had the ability to exercise positive or negative discretion at the end of the performance period to address any unforeseen items or as otherwise warranted under the circumstances. In 2020, no such adjustments or additional awards were made (despite the negative impacts resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic).

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The target and actual annual performance-based cash incentives awards for each NEO under the 2020 AIP are detailed below:

Name	Target Bonus Opportunity ($)		% of Base Salary		Actual 2020 AIP Cash Bonus Awards ($)
John Morris		177,500		50%		144,219
Shaler Alias		157,075		50%		127,623
Timothy J. Murphy		212,437		75%		172,605
Tyler B. Dempsey		175,000		50%		141,187
Michael F. Jackson		124,630		50%		101,261

In addition to the AIP, the Compensation Committee approved a Strategic Integration Bonus Plan for Michael F. Jackson in 2020 in recognition of the significant increase in duties and expectations resulting from the Company’s acquisition and integration activities. Under the terms of the Strategic Integration Bonus Plan, Mr. Jackson was eligible to receive a $50,000 bonus for each successful completed integration of an acquired business. The goals and timelines for each integration, as well as the determination of whether a successful integration was achieved, are established by the CEO and support the Company’s strategic growth strategy. For the year ended December 31, 2020, Mr. Jackson earned an aggregate of $150,000 under the Strategic Integration Bonus Plan for the successful integrations of the TriSource, APS and Ventanex acquisitions.

Long-Term Equity Incentives

During 2020, we granted two types of equity awards to NEOs under the 2019 Plan: time-vested restricted stock and performance-vested restricted stock units. For the NEOs, the Compensation Committee determined to make 50% of the annual equity award in time-vested restricted stock and 50% in performance-vested restricted stock units. In developing this mix of equity awards, the Compensation Committee balanced the objectives relating to achieving milestones and aligning interests with stockholders provided by the performance-based awards and the objectives relating to retention and share ownership provided by the time-based awards. Each of the time-based equity awards generally vests in equal annual installments over a four-year period on the anniversary of the grant date. The performance-based awards have a performance cycle over a three-year performance period beginning in the year of grant. While the performance-based awards cliff vest as of the end of the performance period (subject to Company performance), actual share distribution is subject to a short administration period following the end of the performance period to allow for Compensation Committee approval of achievement of the performance targets.

For the performance-based awards granted in 2020, the Compensation Committee established a Total Shareholder Return (“TSR”) performance measure. TSR is defined as stock price appreciation assuming dividends are reinvested on ex-dividend date. To mitigate against unusual volatility, the actual beginning and ending price for the performance period will reflect a 20-trading day average. The TSR performance will be measured against the Russell 2000. This benchmark provides for a robust comparator group, which mitigates against anomalies due to changes in the composition of the peer group over the performance period. TSR will be measured separately for Repay and each company in the comparator group. The percent of target award earned is based on the percentile rank of Repay’s TSR relative to the TSR of the members of the comparator group. The performance and percent of award earned is as follows:

		Repay TSR Performance				Percent of Target Award Earned
		75th percentile or higher				200%
		50th percentile				100%
		25th percentile				50%
		Below 25th percentile				0%

The award earned for results between the threshold and the maximum of the target is calculated using straight-line interpolation. The achievement of the performance goals for the performance-based equity awards granted in 2020 will be determined in early 2023.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

In determining the size of the dollar value of equity awards granted, the Compensation Committee considered a variety of factors, including the desired equity mix and target total compensation. The actual number of equity awards granted is calculated by dividing the dollar value of the award by the closing price of our stock on the grant date. The annual grant of equity incentives were awarded to our NEOs in 2020 as provided below.

Name	Time-Based Restricted Stock		Performance- Vested Restricted Stock Units
John Morris		112,637		112,636
Shaler Alias		22,909		22,909
Timothy J. Murphy		36,361		36,361
Tyler B. Dempsey		24,342		24,341
Michael F. Jackson		18,789		18,789

Other Important Compensation Policies Affecting the Named Executive Officers

Stock Ownership Guidelines

In 2020, the Compensation Committee adopted minimum ownership requirements for Company stock for the executive officers to align executive interests with stockholders. The ownership threshold for the CEO has been established as five times his annual base salary. The other executive officers must own equity equal to three times their base salary. Compliance with these guidelines will be reviewed annually by the Compensation Committee and the ownership thresholds must be achieved within five years of application of the policy. All of our executive officers are currently in compliance with these stock ownership guidelines.

SEC Form DEF 14A filed by Repay Holdings Corporation