pntg-20250417

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

(Rule 14a-101)

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.)

Filed by the Registrant þ

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o

Check the appropriate box:


o						Preliminary Proxy Statement

o						Confidential, For Use of the Commission only (as permitted by Rule 14a- 6(e)(2))

þ						Definitive Proxy Statement

o						Definitive Additional Materials

o						Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12

THE PENNANT GROUP, INC.

(Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check all boxes that apply):


þ			No fee required

o			Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

o			Fee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

THE PENNANT GROUP, INC.

1675 E. Riverside Drive, Suite 150

Eagle, Idaho 83616

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

TO BE HELD MAY 16, 2025

Meeting Information

How to Vote in Advance

When

Friday, May 16, 2025 at 8:30 a.m. MDT

By Phone

You can vote your shares by calling 800-690-6903

Where

Capitol Hill Assisted Living & Memory Care

76 S. 500 E.

Salt Lake City, UT 84102

By Internet

You can vote your shares online at www.proxyvote.com

Who Can Vote

Only owners of record of the Company's issued and outstanding common stock as of the close of business on March 18, 2025. Each share of common stock is entitled to one vote.

By Mail

Complete, sign, date and return your proxy card or voting instruction form in the postage-paid envelope provided

Date of Mailing

We intend to mail proxy materials on or about April 17, 2025.

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON MAY 16, 2025

Pennant’s Proxy Statement for the 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Proxy Statement”) and 2024 Annual Report on Form 10-K (the “2024 Form 10-K”) are available at www.proxyvote.com.

Your vote is important. Please vote as soon as possible by one of the methods shown above. Be sure to have your proxy card or voting instruction form in hand and follow the instructions above.

Proposals

Board Recommendations

Page

Election of two Class III director nominees named in the proxy statement to serve on The Pennant Group’s Board of Directors

FOR each nominee

Approval of amendment to the Company’s certificate of incorporation to reflect Delaware Law provisions regarding officer exculpation

FOR

Approval of Amended and Restated Pennant Group, Inc. 2019 Omnibus Incentive Plan

FOR

Ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm of the Company for 2025.

FOR

Advisory approval of the Company’s named executive officer compensation

FOR

We will also address any other business which may properly come before the annual meeting or any adjournment or postponement. Following the formal meeting, management will speak on our developments of the past year and respond to questions of general interest to stockholders.

It is important that your shares be represented and voted whether or not you plan to attend the annual meeting in person. If you are the registered holder of your shares and are viewing the proxy statement on the internet, you may grant your proxy electronically via the internet by following the instructions listed on the internet site. If you are receiving a paper copy of the proxy statement, you may grant your proxy by completing and mailing the proxy card enclosed with the proxy statement, or you may grant your proxy electronically via the internet or by telephone by following the instructions on the proxy card. If your shares are held in “street name,” which means your shares are held of record by a broker, bank or other nominee, you should review the notice or voting instruction form you receive from that firm to determine whether and how you will be able to provide voting instructions or submit your proxy by telephone or over the internet. Submitting a proxy over the internet, by telephone or by mailing a proxy card will ensure your shares are represented at the annual meeting.

THE PENNANT GROUP, INC.

BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

BRENT J. GUERISOLI

CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Eagle, Idaho

Dated: April 17, 2025


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Proxy Statement			6

Proposal 1: Election of Two Class III Directors			9
Board Composition			10
Directors and Nominees			10


Corporate Governance			13
Director Independence			13
Code of Conduct and Ethics			13
Board Leadership Structure			13
Risk Oversight			13
Meeting Attendance			14
Committees of the Board of Directors			14
Director Nomination Process			17
Director Compensation			18
Communications with Directors			19

Proposal 2: Approval of the Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation to reflect Delaware Law Provisions regarding Officer Exculpation			19

Proposal 3: Approval of the Amended and Restated Pennant Group, Inc. 2019 Omnibus Incentive Plan			20

Proposal 4: Approval of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm			26
Principal Accountant Fees and Services			26
Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures			26
Audit Committee Report			27

Executive Officers			28

Executive Compensation			29
Compensation Discussion and Analysis			29
Compensation Committee Report			32
Summary Compensation Table			33
Pay Versus Performance			34
Grants of Plan-Based Awards			37
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End			38
Option Exercises and Stock Vested			39
Employment Agreements			39
Pension Benefits			39
Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation			40
Change-in-Control and Severance Disclosure			40
Insider Trading Policy			40
Hedging Transactions			40
Practices for the Timing of Awards as They Relate to the Disclosure of Material Non-Public Information			40
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation			41
Pay Ratio Disclosure			41

Proposal 5: Advisory Vote on Named Executive Officer Compensation			42



Stock Ownership Information			44
Stock Ownership Table			44
Equity Compensation Plan Information			45

Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions			46

Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports			47

Additional Information			48

[This page intentionally left blank]

THE PENNANT GROUP, INC.

1675 E. Riverside Drive, Suite 150

Eagle, Idaho 83616

Proxy Statement

This Proxy Statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Board of Directors (the “Board of Directors” or the “Board”) of The Pennant Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation, for use at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders. When used in this Proxy Statement, the terms “we,” “us,” “our,” or the “Company” refer to The Pennant Group, Inc. and its independent operating subsidiaries. The Pennant Group, Inc. is a holding company and each of its independent operating subsidiaries is operated by its own management, employees and assets. The use of “we,” “us,” “our” and similar words in this Proxy Statement is not meant to imply that any or all of these independent operating subsidiaries are operated by the same entity or that The Pennant Group, Inc. operates any of the businesses conducted by its subsidiaries.

This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this proxy statement and does not contain all of the information that you should consider. You should read the entire proxy statement carefully before voting.

Our Annual Meeting

Date and Time

May 16, 2025 at 8:30 a.m. MDT

Record Date

March 18, 2025

Place

Capitol Hill Assisted Living & Memory Care

76 S. 500 E.

Salt Lake City, UT 84102

Number of Shares Outstanding as of Record Date

34,722,287 shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Common Stock”)

Who Can Vote

Only owners of record of the Company’s issued and outstanding common stock as of the close of business on March 18, 2025. Each share of common stock is entitled to one vote. The Common Stock will vote as a single class with respect to all matters submitted to a vote of the stockholders at the Annual Meeting.

Any stockholder who executes and delivers a proxy has the right to revoke it at any time before it is exercised by delivering to the Secretary of the Company an instrument revoking it or a duly executed proxy bearing a later date, or by attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person. Subject to revocation, the proxy holders will vote all shares represented by a properly executed proxy received in time for the Annual Meeting in accordance with the instructions on the proxy. If no instruction is specified with respect to a matter to be acted upon, the shares represented by the proxy will be voted in accordance with the recommendation of the Board of Directors.

The expenses of preparing, assembling, printing and mailing this Proxy Statement and other materials used in the solicitation of proxies will be borne by the Company. Proxies will be solicited through the internet and the mail and may be solicited by our officers, directors and employees in person, by telephone, or email. They will not receive additional compensation for this effort. We do not anticipate paying any compensation to any other party for the solicitation of proxies, but may reimburse brokerage firms and others for their reasonable expenses in forwarding solicitation material to beneficial owners. The Company may retain the services of a proxy solicitation firm if, in the Board’s view, it is deemed necessary or advisable.

At the Annual Meeting, the stockholders of the Company will be asked to vote on the five proposals below. Your vote is very important. Accordingly, whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting in person, you should complete your proxy card by using one of the methods described in these proxy materials. You may vote your shares at the Annual Meeting by attending and voting in person, by completing your proxy card via the internet or by telephone as described in these proxy materials, or by having your shares represented at the Annual Meeting by a valid proxy. If your shares are not registered directly in your name (e.g., you hold your shares in a stock brokerage account or through a bank or other holder of record), you may provide voting instructions or submit your proxy by following the instructions detailed in the notice or voting instruction form you receive from your broker or other nominee.

Voting Choices and Recommendations of the Board

With respect to Proposal 1 (Election of Directors) you will have the choice to vote “FOR,” “AGAINST” or “ABSTAIN” with respect to each nominee. With respect to Proposals 2, 3, 4 and 5 you will have the choice to vote “FOR,” “AGAINST” or “ABSTAIN.” The Board recommends stockholders vote as follows:


Proposal						Board Recommendation

1						“FOR” the election of each of the two directors nominated by the Board, each for a three-year term expiring at the 2028 annual meeting of stockholders.
2						“FOR” approval of the amendment to the certificate of incorporation to reflect Delaware law provisions regarding officer exculpation.
3						“FOR” approval of the Amended and Restated Pennant Group, Inc. 2019 Omnibus Incentive Plan.
4						“FOR” ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP (“Deloitte”) as independent registered public accounting firm for 2025.
5						“FOR” advisory approval of the Company’s named executive officer compensation.

Quorum Requirements

In order to constitute a quorum for the conduct of business at the Annual Meeting, a majority of the issued and outstanding shares of the Common Stock entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting must be represented, either in person or by proxy, at the Annual Meeting. Under Delaware law, shares represented by proxies that reflect abstentions or broker non-votes will be counted as shares that are present and entitled to vote for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum. A “broker non-vote” occurs when a bank, broker or other holder of record holding shares for a beneficial owner does not vote on a particular proposal because that holder does not have discretionary voting power for that particular item and has not received instructions from the beneficial owner.

Vote Required to Approve Proposals

The following table summarizes the votes required for passage of each proposal and the effect of abstentions and broker non-votes.

Proposal

Vote Required for Approval

Effect of Abstentions

Effect of Broker Non-Votes

Proposal 1. Election of director nominees

Majority of votes cast with respect to each director

No effect

Proposal 2. Approval of amended certificate of incorporation

Majority of voting power present and entitled to vote at the meeting

Against

No effect

Proposal 3. Approval of amended omnibus incentive plan

Majority of voting power present and entitled to vote at the meeting

Against

No effect

Proposal 4. Approval of independent accounting firm

Majority of voting power present and entitled to vote at the meeting

Against

No effect

Proposal 5. Advisory vote to approve named executive officer compensation (“Say-on-Pay”)

Majority of voting power present and entitled to vote at the meeting

Against

No effect

Unless instructed to the contrary, the shares represented by proxies will be voted FOR the election of the Class III director nominees, FOR the approval of the amended certificate of incorporation, FOR the approval of the amended omnibus incentive plan, FOR the approval of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s independent accounting firm, and FOR advisory approval of our named executive officer compensation.

Additional Information Regarding Our Proxy Materials

If your shares are registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, you are considered, with respect to those shares, the “stockholder of record.” In that case, this proxy statement and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 (the “2024 Form 10-K”) have each been sent directly to you.

If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank or other holder of record, you are considered the “beneficial owner” of shares held in street name. In such case, proxy materials will be provided (or otherwise made available) to you by your broker, bank or other holder of record who is considered, with respect to those shares, the stockholder of record. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker, bank or other holder of record on how to vote your shares by following their instructions for voting.

Attending the Annual Meeting

Only stockholders as of the record date, or their duly appointed proxies, and invited guests of the Company may attend the Annual Meeting. Admission to the Annual Meeting will begin at approximately 8:00 a.m. Mountain Time. In order to be admitted to the Annual Meeting, you should:

•bring current, government-issued photo identification, such as a driver’s license, and proof of ownership of common stock on the record date. If you are a holder of record, your identity will be checked against a list of registered holders at the Annual Meeting. If you hold your shares in street name, a recent brokerage statement or a letter from your bank, broker, trustee, or other nominee are examples of proof of ownership. If you want to vote your shares held in street name in person, you must obtain a legal proxy in your name from the broker, bank, trustee, or other nominee that holds your shares of common stock;

•not attempt to record. Cameras, transmission, broadcasting, and other recording devices will not be permitted to be used in the meeting room;

•be prepared to comply with security requirements, which may include, among other security measures, security guards searching all bags and attendees passing through a metal detector; and

•arrive shortly after 8:00 a.m. Mountain Time to ensure that you are seated by the start of the Annual Meeting at 8:30 a.m. Mountain Time.

Any holder of a proxy from a stockholder must present a properly executed legal proxy and a copy of the proof of ownership. If you do not provide photo identification and comply with the other procedures outlined above for attending the Annual Meeting in person, you will not be admitted to the Annual Meeting.

PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF TWO CLASS III DIRECTORS

OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT THE STOCKHOLDERS VOTE “FOR” THE ELECTION OF THE CLASS III DIRECTOR NOMINEES LISTED BELOW.

On the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of our Board of Directors, our Board of Directors, including its independent directors, selected and approved Mr. Stephen M.R. Covey and Ms. Suzanne D. Snapper as nominees for election as Class III directors, the class being elected at the Annual Meeting, each to serve for a term of three years, expiring at the annual meeting of the stockholders to be held following the 2027 fiscal year or until his or her successor is duly appointed or elected and qualified or until his or her earlier death, resignation or removal. We are not aware of any arrangements or understandings between the director nominees and any other person pursuant to which such persons were selected as director nominees. Each of the Class III directors qualifies as an independent director.

Mr. Covey currently serves as a member of our Board of Directors and has agreed to serve if elected. Ms. Snapper is not currently a member of our Board of Directors and has agreed to serve if elected. In the event the nominees named herein are unable to serve or decline to serve at the time of the Annual Meeting, the persons named in the enclosed proxy will exercise discretionary authority to vote for substitutes. Unless otherwise instructed, the proxy holders will vote the proxies received by them FOR the nominees. The proxy cannot be voted for a greater number of persons than two.

Committee Membership

Name

Age

Director Since

Board of Directors

Audit Committee

QAC Committee

NCG Committee

Compensation Committee

Stephen M.R. Covey

2019

Suzanne D. Snapper

Our Board of Directors unanimously recommends that the stockholders vote FOR each of the Class III director nominees listed above.

Background information regarding the nominees and all other directors as of April 1, 2025, including some of the attributes that led to their selection, appears below. In addition, the Board believes that the experience, attributes, and skills of any single director nominee should not be viewed in isolation, but rather in the context of the experience, attributes, and skills that all director nominees bring to the Board as a whole, each of which contributes to the function of an effective Board.

BOARD COMPOSITION

General

Our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (our “Certificate of Incorporation”) provides for a classified board of directors consisting of three classes of directors, with each class serving staggered three-year terms and a nearly equal number of board members in each class, as determined by our Board of Directors. As a result, a portion of our Board of Directors will be elected each year. Our Board of Directors has nominated Mr. Stephen M.R. Covey and Ms. Suzanne D. Snapper as Class III directors, each with a term that would expire at the annual meeting of the stockholders to be held following the 2027 fiscal year. Mr. Christopher R. Christensen, Dr. John G. Nackel, and Mr. Brent J. Guerisoli have been designated Class I directors, and their term expires at the annual meeting of the stockholders to be held following the 2025 fiscal year. Mr. Scott E. Lamb, Dr. Gregory K. Morris, and Mr. Barry M. Smith have been designated Class II directors, and their term expires at the annual meeting of the stockholders to be held following the 2026 fiscal year. One of our current directors, Ms. JoAnne Stringfield, is not standing for reelection at the Annual Meeting, and her term will expire immediately following the Annual Meeting.

Directors and Nominees

The following table and biographical information sets forth certain information about Mr. Stephen M.R. Covey and Ms. Suzanne D. Snapper as well as the continuing directors. Such information is current as of March 18, 2025. The information presented below for each director includes the specific experience, qualifications, attributes and skills that led us to the conclusion that such director should be nominated to serve on our Board of Directors in light of our business.


Name	Age	Position	Director Since

Barry M. Smith	71	Director	2021
Christopher R. Christensen	56	Director	2019
John G. Nackel, Ph.D.	73	Director	2019
Brent J. Guerisoli	44	Chairman and Chief Executive Officer	2023
Stephen M. R. Covey	62	Director	2019
Suzanne D. Snapper	51	Director Nominee	—
Scott E. Lamb	62	Director	2019
Gregory K. Morris, M.D.	70	Director	2022

Nominees for Election to the Board of Directors (Class III Directors)

Stephen M. R. Covey has served as the Chief Executive Officer of CoveyLink Worldwide, LLC, a global business management consulting firm, since 2004, and is the co-founder of FranklinCovey’s Speed of Trust Practice, where he has taught trust and leadership in 61 countries to business, government, and nonprofit organizations. Mr. Covey is the former President and Chief Executive Officer of the Covey Leadership Center, where he grew the company to become one of the largest leadership development firms in the world. He is the former Executive Vice President of the Franklin Covey Co., where he also served as President of the Education & Training business unit. Mr. Covey is The New York Times and Wall Street Journal bestselling author of The Speed of Trust and Trust & Inspire: How Truly Great Leaders Inspire Greatness in Others. Mr. Covey received his MBA from Harvard Business School. Mr. Covey serves on the Government Leadership Advisory Council, and he has been recognized with the Lifetime Achievement Award for “Top Thought Leaders in Trust” from the advocacy group, Trust Across America/Trust Around the World. We believe that Mr. Covey’s extensive experience in both culture and leadership development, as well as his proven track record of educating and helping business leaders achieve their organization goals, supports the conclusion he should serve as one of our directors.

Suzanne D. Snapper is the Chief Financial Officer of the Ensign Group, Inc. (“Ensign”) (NASDAQ: ENSG), a leading publicly-traded provider of skilled nursing services. In this role, which Ms. Snapper has held since 2009, Ms. Snapper is responsible for Ensign’s accounting, finance, information technology, tax, internal controls, investor relations, managed care, treasury and finance risk management functions. During her tenure, Ms. Snapper has helped Ensign generate significant shareholder value, including through multiple spin-offs that have met marketplace needs and benefited shareholders. Ms. Snapper has served as a member of Ensign’s board of directors since 2022. Prior to Ensign, Ms. Snapper acquired additional invaluable experience in financial management and reporting while employed at KPMG from 1996 to 2007. Ms. Snapper is a certified public accountant. We believe that Ms. Snapper’s extensive experience in post-acute health care, along with her substantial expertise in financial matters and public company governance, support the conclusion that she should serve as one of our directors.

Class I Directors

Christopher R. Christensen currently serves as the Executive Chairman of Ensign. Mr. Christensen served as Ensign’s President from 1999, and its Chief Executive Officer from April 2006, in each case until May 2019. Mr. Christensen has served as a member of Ensign’s board of directors since Ensign’s formation in 1999 and has overseen Ensign and its growth since its inception. Prior to the formation of Ensign, Mr. Christensen served as acting Chief Operating Officer of Covenant Care, Inc., a California-based provider of long-term care. In addition, Mr. Christensen served on the board of directors of CareTrust REIT from June 2014 to April 2015. We believe that Mr. Christensen’s important role in the history and management of Ensign and our Company and his leadership and business skills support the conclusion that he should serve as one of our directors.

John G. Nackel, Ph.D. served as a member of the board of directors of Ensign from June 2008 through December 2019. He is currently the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Three-Sixty Advisory Group, LLC (“Three-Sixty”) and Founder and General Partner of Wavemaker Three-Sixty Health, LP (“Wavemaker 360”) venture fund. Founded in 2007 by Dr. Nackel, Three-Sixty consults with leading health systems, payers, physicians, medical technology companies, and other providers. Founded in 2018, Wavemaker 360 invests in early-stage health care companies in the value-based payment space. Dr. Nackel is a 25-year veteran of Ernst & Young where he advised health care companies in his role as a Global Managing Director of Health Care. Dr. Nackel also served as Chief Executive Officer of Ingenix Consulting (now Optum), a division of United Healthcare. In addition, Dr. Nackel served as a director of Mercury General Corporation (NYSE: MCY) from 2016 until 2018. During his career, Dr. Nackel has also served as a board member or chairman of several privately held start-ups and emerging companies, including Visual Health Solutions, Vitalacy, HealthTask, ConnectedHealth, NetStrike, and Sertan, Inc. He earned his bachelor’s degree at Tufts University, master’s degrees in public health and industrial engineering at the University of Missouri, and a Ph.D. in industrial engineering (health systems design) at the University of Missouri. He is a fellow of the American College of Healthcare Executives and the Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society. He is a senior member of the Institute of Industrial Engineers. We believe that Dr. Nackel’s extensive experience as a consultant and an advisor to healthcare companies, his extensive board and management experience and his valuable leadership and management insights support the conclusion that he should serve as one of our directors.

Brent J. Guerisoli was appointed Chief Executive Officer of the Company effective August 1, 2022. He previously served as the President of the Company from January 2021 until his appointment as CEO. He has served as a member of the Company’s board of directors since February 2023. Prior to his appointment as President of Pennant, Mr. Guerisoli served as President of Cornerstone Healthcare, Pennant’s home health and hospice segment, helping lead the segment through a period of transformational growth, breakout financial performance and enhanced clinical excellence. Since joining the Company in 2012, Mr. Guerisoli has made significant contributions to the financial, clinical, and cultural achievements of Cornerstone and has played a key role in the organization’s overall leadership recruiting and training. Throughout his tenure at Pennant, Mr. Guerisoli has developed dozens of leaders and directed the organization’s growth efforts across several states. Mr. Guerisoli received his Master of Business Administration from the Walter A. Haas School of Business at the University of California, Berkeley. Prior to joining Pennant, Mr. Guerisoli completed the executive training program and later served as a business manager at AT&T. Mr. Guerisoli’s extensive knowledge of our operations and industry and his proven leadership skills support the conclusion that he should serve as one of our directors. Mr. Guerisoli’s service on the Board creates a critical link between management and the Board of Directors.

Class II Directors

Scott E. Lamb served as the Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of ICU Medical, Inc. (“ICU Medical”) (NASDAQ: ICUI), a publicly traded company that develops, manufactures, and sells medical technologies used in vascular therapy, oncology, and critical care applications, from February 2008 to March 2020. From 2003 to February 2008, Mr. Lamb served as ICU Medical’s Controller. From 2000 to 2003, Mr. Lamb served as Senior Director of Finance for Vitalcom, Inc. Prior to that, Mr. Lamb held various finance and accounting roles at other start-up and manufacturing companies. Mr. Lamb’s experience as the Chief Financial Officer of a public company for over a decade supports the conclusion that he should serve as one of our directors.

Gregory K. Morris, M.D. has been a partner since 2012 in MorrisHuml LLC—a consultancy that supports Fortune 1000 firms across industry sectors— where his areas of focus include strategy implementation, strategic alignment, prospective risk mitigation and shaping culture through action learning. Prior to MorrisHuml, he was a partner at Morris & Gunter Associates, LLC. From 2002 until 2004, he was senior vice president for strategy and business development for Advocate Health Care, and from 1995 until 2001, he worked at Cap Gemini Ernst & Young as Vice President as well as Senior Partner. His insurance experience includes serving as senior vice president health care delivery and corporate medical director for Blue Cross and Blue Shield National Capital Area, Eastern Region Medical Director for MetLife and Medical Director for CIGNA Healthcare of Georgia. He achieved the rank of Major with the Army National Guard/U.S. Army and was awarded the Bronze Star. Dr. Morris graduated from Morehouse College and received his M.D. from Emory University School of Medicine. We believe Dr. Morris’s extensive leadership development expertise in healthcare and in other industries, his clinical background and experience practicing in healthcare organizations and his valuable strategic and other management insights support the conclusion that he should serve as one of our directors.

Barry M. Smith served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Magellan Health, Inc., the nation’s largest provider of behavioral health services and a leading national provider of radiology benefit management services, specialty pharmacy and prescription benefit management services, from 2013 until 2019. He founded and served as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of VistaCare, Inc., a national provider of hospice services, from 1996 to 2002, and he served as Chairman of VistaCare in 2003. From 1990 through 1995, Mr. Smith served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Value Rx, Inc., which was then one of the country’s largest pharmacy benefit management companies and, prior to that, served as vice president of operations for PCS Health Systems, also a pharmacy benefit management firm. Mr. Smith has served as a member of the board of directors of Ensign since 2014. We believe Mr. Smith’s extensive experience as a proven and experienced leader in numerous healthcare businesses that are closely related to our businesses and his valuable strategic and other management insights support the conclusion that he should serve as one of our directors.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

We are committed to continually enhancing our strong corporate governance practices, which we believe helps us sustain our success and build long-term value for our stockholders. Our Board of Directors sets high standards for our employees, officers and directors. Implicit in this philosophy is the importance of sound corporate governance. It is the duty of the Board of Directors to serve as a prudent fiduciary for stockholders and to oversee the management of the Company’s business. Our governance structure enables independent, experienced and accomplished directors to provide advice, insight, guidance and oversight to advance the interests of the Company and our stockholders.

Director Independence

The Nasdaq Stock Market Rules require that a majority of the members of our Board of Directors qualify as “independent,” as affirmatively determined by our Board of Directors. After review of all of the relevant transactions or relationships between each director (and his or her family members) and us, our senior management and our independent registered public accounting firm, our Board of Directors has affirmatively determined that each of Drs. John G. Nackel and Gregory K. Morris, Ms. JoAnne Stringfield and Ms. Suzanne D. Snapper, and Messrs. Christopher R. Christensen, Scott E. Lamb, Stephen M. R. Covey, and Barry M. Smith satisfies the requirements to serve as an “independent director” as such term is defined in Rule 5605(a)(2) of the Nasdaq Stock Market Rules. In this Proxy Statement, the aforementioned directors are referred to individually as an “Independent Director” and collectively as the “Independent Directors.” The Independent Directors intend to meet at least annually in executive sessions at which only Independent Directors will be present.

Each member of our Board of Directors serving on our Audit, Compensation and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees is “independent” within the meaning of the applicable Nasdaq Stock Market Rules and, as applicable, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).

Code of Conduct and Ethics

We have adopted a code of ethics and business conduct that applies to all employees, including employees of our subsidiaries, as well as each member of our Board of Directors. The code of ethics and business conduct is available at our website at https://investor.pennantgroup.com/corporate-governance/governance-overview. Information on our website is not incorporated by reference into this Proxy Statement and should not be considered part of this document.

We intend to satisfy any disclosure requirement under Item 5.05 of Form 8-K regarding an amendment to, or waiver from, a provision of this code of ethics by posting such information on our website, at the address specified above.

Board Leadership Structure

The Board of Directors does not have a policy regarding the separation of the roles of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors, as the Board of Directors believes it is in the best interests of the Company to make that determination based on the position and direction of the Company and the membership of the Board of Directors. Currently, the Chief Executive Officer position and Chairman of the Board of Directors position are filled by Brent J. Guerisoli. Mr. Scott E. Lamb serves as lead independent director.

Risk Oversight

Our Board of Directors actively oversees the Company’s risk and enterprise-wide risk management process in a way that balances managing risks while enhancing the long-term value of the Company for the benefit of the stockholders. They focus on effective risk oversight to set the Company’s tone and culture with respect to effective risk management by developing and establishing a mutual understanding with management of the Company’s risk philosophy and overall appetite for risk. Our Board of Directors is actively involved with management’s assessment of existing risk management processes and how management identifies, assesses and manages the Company’s most significant risk exposures. Our Board of Directors expects frequent updates from management about the Company’s most significant risks to enable it to evaluate whether management is responding appropriately and is actively engaged in managing talent and long-term succession planning for executives.

Our Board of Directors relies on each of its four committees (collectively, the “Board Committees”) to help oversee the risk management responsibilities relating to the functions performed by the Board Committees. Our Audit Committee periodically discusses with management the Company’s major financial, compliance and cybersecurity risk exposures and the steps management has taken to monitor and control such exposures, including the Company’s risk assessment and risk management policies. Our Compensation Committee helps the Board of Directors identify the Company’s exposure to any risks potentially created by our compensation programs and practices. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance and Quality Assurance and

Compliance Committees support the Company’s quality assurance programs, oversee risks relating to the Company’s policies and assist the Board of Directors and management in promoting an organizational culture that encourages commitment to ethical conduct and a commitment to compliance with the law. Each of these Board Committees is required to make regular reports of its actions and any recommendations to the Board of Directors, including recommendations to assist the Board of Directors with its overall risk oversight function.

Management and directors engage with our stockholders throughout the year in a variety of forums. Our interactions cover a broad range of governance and business topics, including proxy access, board elections, compensation practices, peer group composition and business strategy. Our engagement activities and meaningful exchanges to which we have been exposed provide us with a valuable understanding of our stockholders’ perspectives and an opportunity to share views with them. We look forward to maintaining an open line of dialogue with our stockholders.

We encourage you to visit the Corporate Governance area of the “Investor Relations” section of our website (https://investor.pennantgroup.com/corporate-governance/governance-overview) where you will find detailed information about our corporate governance practices and policies, including the charters of our Board Committees.

Meeting Attendance

During the year ended December 31, 2024, our Board of Directors met five times. Each member of the Board of Directors attended at least 75 percent of the meetings of our Board of Directors and the meetings of any of our Board Committees on which each member of the Board of Directors served that were held during 2024. In addition, the Board of Directors meets in executive sessions without management present. Our Board of Directors also acted by way of unanimous written consent during the year ended December 31, 2024.

Although we do not have a formal policy regarding attendance by members of our Board of Directors at our Annual Meeting of Stockholders, we encourage our directors to attend. Last year, all of our directors attended our Annual Meeting of Stockholders, and we anticipate that at least a majority of our Board of Directors will attend the Annual Meeting this year.

Committees of the Board of Directors

During fiscal year 2024, our Board of Directors had four standing Board Committees: the Compensation Committee, the Audit Committee, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Quality Assurance and Compliance Committee. The Board of Directors, upon the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, makes Board Committee and committee chair assignments annually at its meeting immediately following the annual meeting of stockholders, although further changes to committee assignments are made from time to time as deemed appropriate by the Board of Directors. Each of the Board Committees operate pursuant to written charters, copies of which are available on our website at https://investor.pennantgroup.com/corporate-governance/governance-overview.

The following table identifies the members of the Board’s standing committees and the number of meetings held by each committee during 2024.

Compensation Committee

Audit Committee

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

Quality Assurance and Compliance Committee

Barry M. Smith

Christopher R. Christensen

John G. Nackel, Ph.D.

Brent J. Guerisoli*

Stephen M. R. Covey

JoAnne Stringfield

Scott E. Lamb

Gregory K. Morris, M.D.

Number of Meetings in 2024

Chairman of the Board

Member

Chairperson

Audit Committee

Our Audit Committee currently consists of Mr. Scott E. Lamb, Dr. Gregory K. Morris and Dr. John G. Nackel. Mr. Scott E. Lamb serves as Chairperson of the Audit Committee. All members of the Audit Committee meet the independence requirements set forth by the SEC, the Nasdaq Stock Market listing standards and the Audit Committee charter. Our Audit Committee held five meetings in 2024. The Audit Committee met four times in executive session without management present and each time the Chairperson of the Audit Committee chaired such executive session. Each member of our Audit Committee is “financially literate” as required by, and in accordance with, the Nasdaq listing requirements. Our Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Scott E. Lamb qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as that term is defined in the rules and regulations established by the SEC. This designation is a disclosure requirement of the SEC related to Mr. Scott E. Lamb’s experience and understanding with respect to certain accounting and auditing matters. The designation does not impose on Mr. Scott E. Lamb any duties, obligations or liability that are greater than those generally imposed as a member of our Audit Committee and our Board of Directors, and such designation as an audit committee financial expert pursuant to this SEC requirement does not affect the duties, obligations or liability of any other member of our Audit Committee or Board of Directors. The primary functions of the Audit Committee include, among other things:

•overseeing our financial reporting process and the integrity of our financial statements and other financial information provided by us to the public or any governmental or regulatory body;

•overseeing the functioning of our internal controls;

•ongoing monitoring and oversight of cybersecurity risks and related mitigation measures;

•maintaining the procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters, and for the confidential, anonymous submission by our employees of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters;

•approving of our transactions with related persons pursuant to the Related Person Transaction Policy (as defined herein);

•pre-approving audit and permissible non-audit services to be performed by our independent accountants, if any, and the fees to be paid in connection therewith;

•engaging, replacing and compensating our independent auditors and overseeing our independent auditors’ qualifications, independence and performance of the annual independent audit of our financial statements;

•advising the Board of Directors and overseeing the Company’s reporting on material, legally-mandated environmental, social and governance matters and initiatives and evaluating the Company’s disclosures relating to such matters;

•overseeing legal compliance programs and addressing any legal or regulatory matters that may have a material impact on our financial statements; and

•overseeing, updating and implementing the portions of our code of ethics and business conduct that relate to the integrity of our financial reports.

In fulfilling its responsibilities, the Audit Committee also sets the “tone at the top” and emphasizes the importance of an environment that supports integrity in the financial reporting process, oversees processes for monitoring auditor independence, oversees implementation of new accounting standards and reviews and understands non-GAAP measures, and related Company policies and disclosure controls. The responsibilities of our Audit Committee are more fully described in our Audit Committee Charter, which is available on our website at https://investor.pennantgroup.com/corporate-governance/governance-overview. Representatives of our independent registered public accounting firm and our internal financial personnel regularly meet privately with and have unrestricted access to the Audit Committee.

Compensation Committee

Our Compensation Committee currently consists of Dr. John G. Nackel, Mr. Stephen M. R. Covey and Ms. JoAnne Stringfield. Dr. John G. Nackel serves as Chairperson of the Compensation Committee. All members of the Compensation Committee meet the independence requirements set forth by the Nasdaq Stock Market listing standards and the Compensation Committee charter. Each member of the Compensation Committee is a “non-employee director” (within the meaning of Rule 16b-3 under the Exchange Act) and an “outside director” (within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended). Our Compensation Committee held six meetings in 2024. The Compensation Committee met five times in executive session without management present and each time the Chairperson of the Committee chaired such executive session. The primary functions of the Compensation Committee include, among other things:

•developing and reviewing policies relating to executive compensation and benefits;

•determining or recommending to our Board of Directors the cash and non-cash compensation of our executive officers and non-employee directors;

•evaluating the performance of our executive officers; and

•administering or making recommendations to our Board of Directors with respect to the administration of our equity-based and executive incentive compensation plans.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee currently consists of Messrs. Barry M. Smith, Scott E. Lamb and Stephen M. R. Covey. Mr. Barry M. Smith serves as the Chairperson of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Each member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee meets the independence requirements set forth in the Nasdaq listing requirements and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee charter. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee held six meetings in 2024. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee met four times in executive session without management present and each time the Chairperson of the Committee chaired such executive session. The primary responsibilities of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee include, among other things:

•assisting the Board of Directors in establishing the minimum qualifications for a director nominee, including the qualities and skills that members of our Board of Directors are expected to possess;

•management succession planning;

•selecting, or recommending that our Board of Directors selects, the director nominees for election at the next annual meeting of stockholders, or to fill vacancies on our Board of Directors occurring between annual meetings of stockholders;

•identifying and evaluating individuals qualified to become members of our Board of Directors, consistent with criteria approved by our Board of Directors and our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee;

•developing, recommending to our Board of Directors, and assessing our corporate governance policies; and

•advising the Board of Directors on management of the Company’s strategy, initiatives, and risks as it relates to governance.

Quality Assurance and Compliance Committee

Our Quality Assurance and Compliance Committee currently consists of Mr. Christopher R. Christensen, Mr. Brent J. Guerisoli, Ms. JoAnne Stringfield and Dr. Gregory K. Morris. Ms. JoAnne Stringfield serves as the Chairperson of the Quality Assurance and Compliance Committee. Our Quality Assurance and Compliance Committee held four meetings in 2024. The primary responsibilities of the Quality Assurance and Compliance Committee include, among other things:

•overseeing the promulgation and periodic updating of a written corporate compliance program that includes written policies, procedures and standards of conduct, as well as disciplinary guidelines to assist officers and employees charged with direct enforcement responsibility;

•designating a corporate compliance officer, and functioning as the compliance committee to which such compliance officer reports;

•ensuring that means exist for the delivery of appropriate compliance training and education to the officers and employees of our several subsidiaries;

•establishing lines of communication for escalating compliance and quality assurance issues to our Quality Assurance and Compliance Committee and our Board of Directors;

•monitoring the effectiveness of internal compliance and quality assurance audits; and

•causing our officers to respond, as appropriate, to compliance and quality assurance issues and to take effective corrective action.

Director Nomination Process

As indicated above, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee oversees the director nomination process. This committee is responsible for assisting the Board of Directors in establishing minimum qualifications for director nominees, including qualities and skills that members of our Board of Directors are expected to possess. Under our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee charter, which is available at our website at https://investor.pennantgroup.com/corporate-governance/governance-overview, these criteria include the candidate’s personal and professional integrity, the candidate’s financial literacy or other professional or business experience relevant to an understanding of the Company and its business, the candidate’s demonstrated ability to think and act independently and with sound judgment, and the candidate’s ability to be effective, in conjunction with other members or nominees of the Board of Directors in collectively serving the long-term interests of the Company and its stockholders. Information on our website is not incorporated by reference into this Proxy Statement and should not be considered part of this document. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee identifies and evaluates individuals qualified to become members of our Board of Directors. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee then recommends that our Board of Directors select the director nominees for the election at the next annual meeting of stockholders, or to fill vacancies on our Board of Directors occurring between annual meetings of the stockholders.

We believe it is important to have an appropriate mix of backgrounds and perspectives for the optimal functionality of the Board of Directors. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee charter requires that the committee consider each candidate’s qualities, skills, background, ability, judgment, and experience in the context of the needs and current make-up of the Board of Directors when evaluating director nominees. The Board of Directors believes it is important for each member of the Board of Directors to possess skills and knowledge in the areas of leadership of large, complex organizations; finance; strategic planning; laws and regulations; government relations; and relevant industries, especially the healthcare and home health, hospice and senior living industries. These considerations help ensure that the Board of Directors as a whole has the appropriate mix of characteristics, skills and experiences for the optimal functioning of the Board of Directors in its oversight of our Company. As part of its periodic self-assessment process, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reviews and evaluates its performance, including overall composition of the Board of Directors and the criteria that it uses for selecting nominees in light of the specific skills and characteristics necessary for the optimal functioning of the Board of Directors in its oversight of our Company. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers all of the criteria described above in identifying and selecting nominees and in the future may establish additional minimum criteria for nominees.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider nominees for the Board of Directors who are recommended by stockholders who meet the eligibility requirements set forth in our Amended and Restated Bylaws (our “Bylaws”). If an eligible stockholder wishes to recommend a nominee, he or she should submit such recommendation in writing to the Chair, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, c/o Secretary of the Company, Kirk S. Cheney, The Pennant Group, Inc., 1675 E. Riverside Drive, Suite 150, Eagle, Idaho 83616, by the deadline for stockholder proposals set forth in the Company’s last proxy statement, specifying the information required by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee charter and our Bylaws. All such recommendations will be brought to the attention of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee shall evaluate such director nominees in accordance with the same criteria applicable to the evaluation of all director nominees.

General Nomination Right of All Stockholders

Any stockholder may nominate one or more persons for election as a director at an annual meeting of stockholders if the stockholder complies with the notice, information and consent provisions contained in our Bylaws, as discussed in “Future Stockholder Proposals” below. Unless otherwise required by law, if a stockholder (or a qualified representative of the stockholder) does not appear at the annual or special meeting of stockholders of the Company and present his or her proposed business or nomination, such proposed business will not be transacted and the nomination will be disregarded. The presiding officer of an annual meeting of stockholders shall refuse to acknowledge the nomination of any person not made in compliance with the foregoing procedure.

Director Compensation

We provide cash and stock compensation to directors for their services as directors or members of Board Committees. We also reimburse our non-employee directors for their reasonable expenses incurred in attending meetings of our Board of Directors and Board Committees.

In fiscal year 2024, each of our non-employee directors received an annual retainer of $30,000, with the exception of Barry M. Smith, who served as Board Chairman throughout 2024, and whose retainer is described below. In addition, each member of the Board Committees received the following annual retainers:


Committees	Chair Retainer		Member Retainer

Audit	$	30,000	$	12,000
Quality Assurance and Compliance	30,000		12,000
Nominating and Corporate Governance	15,000		7,500
Compensation	22,500		10,000

In lieu of a separate member retainer and committee or chair retainers, Barry M. Smith, who served as Board Chairman through December 31, 2024, received a single aggregate retainer of $80,000 in 2024. We do not compensate our non-employee directors other than for their service on our Board of Directors or the Board Committees. Historically, we have compensated our non-employee Board members based upon what we considered to be fair compensation. Compensation for Board of Directors and Board Committee service is partially based upon relevant market data that we obtain by reviewing director compensation by public companies in the home health, hospice, senior living and other related healthcare industries.

We engage with independent compensation consultants to review our director and executive compensation in comparison to peer companies. These experts have analyzed the target total compensation, including cash compensation and equity compensation, paid to our directors, executives, and certain key leaders. Informed by this review process, our Compensation Committee set the amount of annual retainers for non-employee directors and retainers for the chairpersons of each Board Committee at levels that the Compensation Committee believes are comparable to the cash compensation paid to directors of peer group companies.

Our 2019 Omnibus Incentive Plan contains an automatic stock grant program for our directors. Each non-employee director receives an automatic grant of restricted stock on the 15th day of the month following each quarter end, which shares vest over a three-year period beginning with the first anniversary of the grant date (the “Automatic Stock Grant Program”). The total number of shares to be granted each year under the Automatic Stock Grant Program is determined by the Compensation Committee in the fourth quarter immediately preceding each fiscal year. The Compensation Committee reviews peer compensation, Board performance, Company performance, and other factors, to determine an annual board compensation target. Based on this target, non-employee directors receive quarterly grants of a predetermined number of restricted shares. The actual compensation received by directors may be above or below the Compensation Committee’s target because the value of restricted stock grants fluctuates with the Company’s stock price. In 2024, each non-employee director received 12,000 restricted shares, with the exception of Barry M. Smith, who received 21,000, which the Compensation Committee determined to be fair and reasonable compensation for the elevated commitment required of Mr. Smith as Chairman.

Unvested restricted stock grants will become fully vested on the date each non-employee director ceases serving on the Board of Directors unless such director is removed for cause. Pursuant to the Automatic Stock Grant Program, each Board member who receives stock grants must maintain ownership of a minimum of thirty-three percent (33%) of the cumulative shares granted to him or her. Our Board of Directors and Compensation Committee considered the total compensation paid to directors of peer companies in deciding to grant these automatic stock awards. However, our Board of Directors and Compensation Committee ultimately determined the amount of stock awards based on what they considered to be an appropriate incentive for board service to the Company, and not on the amount awarded to directors of peer companies. Our Board of Directors has also determined that it may be necessary to provide additional incentives to prospective directors in order to recruit talented leaders to serve on the Board of Directors.

None of our directors or director nominees has any agreement or arrangement with any third party that relates to compensation or other payment in connection with that person’s candidacy or service as a director of our Company.

The following table sets forth the compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid to our non-employee directors for the year ended December 31, 2024. Each of the directors included in the table served for the full-year 2024. Director compensation exceeded prior years because the Company’s stock price rose significantly during the year, increasing the value of the predetermined number of shares each director received under the Automatic Stock Grant Program.


Name	Fees Earned ($)	Stock Awards ($)(1)	Total($)

Christopher R. Christensen(2)	42,000	290,160	332,160
John G. Nackel, Ph.D.(3)	64,500	290,160	354,660
Stephen M. R. Covey(4)	47,500	290,160	337,660
JoAnne Stringfield(5)	70,000	290,160	360,160
Scott E. Lamb(6)	67,500	290,160	357,660
Gregory K. Morris, M.D.(7)	57,000	290,160	347,160
Barry M. Smith(8)	80,000	535,014	615,014


(1)						This column reflects the total dollar amount recognized for financial statement reporting purposes with respect to the fair value of the restricted stock awards granted to each of the directors in accordance with Accounting Standard Codification (ASC) 718, Stock Compensation. Mr. Christopher R. Christensen, Dr. John G. Nackel, Mr. Stephen M. R. Covey, Ms. JoAnne Stringfield, Mr. Scott E. Lamb, and Dr. Gregory K. Morris each received grants of 3,000 shares of restricted stock in the first month of each quarter for the full-year 2024. Mr. Barry M. Smith received grants of 4,500 shares of restricted stock in the first month of each quarter for the full-year 2024 with an additional 600 and 2,400 shares of restricted stock awarded during the third and fourth quarter, respectively. Compensation expense for stock awards granted to Board of Directors were recognized in full on the date these awards were granted.
(2)						As of December 31, 2024, Mr. Christensen had no stock awards outstanding and 8,000 option awards outstanding.
(3)						As of December 31, 2024, Dr. Nackel had no stock awards outstanding and 8,000 option awards outstanding.
(4)						As of December 31, 2024, Mr. Covey had no stock awards outstanding and 5,000 option awards outstanding.
(5)						As of December 31, 2024, Ms. Stringfield had no stock awards outstanding and 5,000 option awards outstanding.
(6)						As of December 31, 2024, Mr. Lamb had no stock awards outstanding and 5,000 option awards outstanding.
(7)						As of December 31, 2024, Dr. Morris had no stock awards outstanding and no option awards outstanding.
(8)						As of December 31, 2024, Mr. Smith had no stock awards outstanding and 30,000 option awards outstanding.

Communications with Directors

Stockholders who would like to send communications to our Board of Directors, any Board Committee or to any individual director may do so by submitting such communications by mail to Kirk S. Cheney, c/o The Pennant Group, Inc., 1675 E. Riverside Drive, Suite 150, Eagle, Idaho 83616. We suggest, but do not require, that such submissions include the name and contact information of the stockholder making the submission and a description of the matter that is the subject of the communication. Mr. Cheney will then distribute such information to our Board of Directors for review. Communications received by the Company may be reviewed by Mr. Cheney to ensure appropriate and careful review of the matter.

PROPOSAL 2: APPROVAL OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE COMPANY’S CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION TO REFLECT DELAWARE LAW PROVISIONS REGARDING OFFICER EXCULPATION

OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT THE STOCKHOLDERS VOTE "FOR" THE APPROVAL OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE COMPANY’S CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION TO REFLECT DELAWARE LAW PROVISIONS REGARDING OFFICER EXCULPATION.

Background of the Proposal

Exculpation provisions in corporate governing documents generally eliminate individual liability for monetary damages in direct claims of a breach of the duty of care. Our Certificate of Incorporation currently provides for the exculpation of directors but does not correspondingly include a provision that allows for the exculpation of officers. Until August 1, 2022, the Delaware General Corporation Law (the “DGCL”) limited exculpation to directors alone. However, legislation in the State of Delaware now permits Delaware corporations to include a provision in their certificates of incorporation to exculpate certain officers, consistent with Delaware corporations’ ability to exculpate directors, for personal liability for breach of the duty of care in certain actions.

In light of this change to the DGCL, stockholders are being asked to approve an amendment to Article IX of our Certificate of Incorporation, which is attached as Appendix A to this Proxy Statement, to provide for exculpation of certain of our officers from liability in specific circumstances, as now permitted by Delaware law. The new Delaware legislation only permits, and our proposed amendment would only permit, exculpation for direct claims (as opposed to derivative claims made by stockholders on behalf of the Company) and would not apply to breaches of the duty of loyalty, acts or omissions not in good faith or that involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law, or any transaction in which the officer derived an improper personal benefit. The rationale for so limiting an officer’s scope of liability is to strike a balance between stockholders’ interest in accountability and their interest in the Company’s ability to attract and retain talented officers to work on such stockholders’ behalf.

At its meeting held on March 3, 2025, the Board of Directors approved this amendment, subject to stockholder approval, and directed that this amendment be submitted to a vote of the Company’s stockholders at this Annual Meeting. The Board has determined that this amendment is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders and recommends approval by the stockholders.

Approval of an amendment to the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation to provide for exculpation of certain of our officers from liability in specific circumstances requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding shares of Common Stock entitled to vote.

This Proposal 2 will be effective upon its approval by our stockholders at the Annual Meeting and is not conditioned upon the approval by our stockholders of any other proposal. As each proposal will be presented to our stockholders at the Annual Meeting in the order presented herein, if this Proposal 2 is approved by our stockholders, it will become effective.

Purpose of Amendment

Addressing Rising Litigation and Insurance Costs for Stockholders

Prior to the amendment of the DGCL, stockholder plaintiffs have brought certain claims – which would otherwise be exculpated if brought against directors – against individual officers to avoid dismissal of such claims. The amendment of the DGCL was adopted in part to address rising litigation and insurance costs for corporations that resulted from the inconsistent treatment under Delaware corporate law of exculpation of directors and officers. Accordingly, this amendment of our Certificate of Incorporation will more closely align the protections available to our officers with those currently available to our directors. In addition, we are not proposing this change to the Certificate of Incorporation in anticipation of any specific litigation confronting the Company; instead, we are proposing this change on a prospective basis to help mitigate potential future harm to the Company and its stockholders.

Enhanced Ability to Attract and Retain Officers

Our Board believes that enhancing our ability to retain and attract experienced officers is in the best interests of the Company, and we should seek to assure such persons that exculpation under certain circumstances is available. We believe that failing to adopt this proposal to amend our Certificate of Incorporation could impact our recruitment and retention of exceptional officer candidates who conclude that the potential exposure to liabilities, costs of defense, and other risks of proceedings exceeds the benefits of serving as an officer of the Company. The protections provided by this amendment have long been available to directors, and the Board believes aligning these protections are in the best interests of the Company.

Accordingly, to obtain the benefits we believe would accrue to the Company and our stockholders in the form of an enhanced ability to attract and retain talented officers and address rising litigation and insurance costs, the Board recommends that our stockholders approve the amendment of our Certificate of Incorporation to limit the liability of certain officers of the Company as permitted under Delaware law.

PROPOSAL 3: APPROVAL OF THE AMENDED AND RESTATED PENNANT GROUP, INC. 2019 OMNIBUS INCENTIVE PLAN

OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT THE STOCKHOLDERS VOTE "FOR" THE APPROVAL OF THE AMENDED AND RESTATED PENNANT GROUP, INC. 2019 OMNIBUS INCENTIVE PLAN.

Background of the Proposal

We currently maintain the Pennant Group, Inc. 2019 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “Plan”). We believe our success depends on our ability to recruit and retain a talented employee base. The Plan provides an important compensation resource to retain highly qualified employees, non-employee directors, and other services providers. The Plan provides incentives that align the economic interests of plan participants with those of our stockholders. The Plan was previously approved by the Company’s sole stockholder prior to the spin-off of the Company from The Ensign Group, Inc.

The Board of Directors is requesting that you approve an amended and restated version of the Plan. The amended and restated version of the Plan is referred to in this Proposal 3 as the “2025 Plan.” The 2025 Plan includes the following material changes as compared to the version of the Plan that was approved prior to the spin-off:

1.Adds an additional 3,275,000 shares of our Common Stock will be made available for issuance under the 2025 Plan.

2.Extends the term of the 2025 Plan to 10 years from the most recent stockholder approval.

3.Modifies the 2025 Plan’s share accounting provisions to provide that full value awards such as restricted stock awards and restricted stock unit awards will reduce the 2025 Plan’s share reserve by two shares for every one share issued under the Plan, but other awards such as stock options and stock appreciation rights will reduce the 2025 Plan’s share reserve on a one-for-one basis consistent with recommendations from shareholder advisory firms.

4.Clarifies the manner and timing in which shares may become vested or paid in connection with a change in control of the Company.

5.Clarifies the process for determining and distributing stock grants to directors.

Other than as described above, the 2025 Plan does not contain any material changes as compared to the Plan.

APPROVAL OF 3,275,000 ADDITIONAL SHARES OF COMMON STOCK FOR ISSUANCE UNDER THE 2025 PLAN

Under the Plan, as of March 18, 2025 (the “Record Date”), equity awards covering 4,981,538 shares had been granted, net of cancellations. As of the Record Date, approximately 18,462 shares remained available for future grants. The numbers of shares available for grants was insufficient to permit the Company to make grants to employees for 2025.

In order to enable us to continue offering meaningful equity-based incentives to key employees, non-employee directors and other service providers, the Board of Directors believes that it is both necessary and appropriate to increase the number of shares of Common Stock available for these purposes. Accordingly, we are asking our stockholders to approve an amendment and restatement of the Plan that would increase the total number of shares of Common Stock available for grant under the Plan by 3,275,000, which would make available for grant under the 2025 Plan a total of 3,293,462 shares of Common Stock. If stockholders approve the 2025 Plan, we expect that the shares available under the 2025 Plan will meet our anticipated needs for approximately 3 years of awards, subject to changes in business conditions or other trends.

Why We Are Requesting 3.3 Million Shares

The following table sets forth certain information regarding the Plan as of March 18, 2025:


Number of shares issuable upon vesting of outstanding restricted stock awards...........			152,560
Number of shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding option awards......................			3,498,830
Number of shares available for future awards............................................................			18,462
Proposed increase in shares reserved for issuance......................................................			3,275,000

The closing price of our common stock on the Nasdaq Stock Market on March 18, 2025 was $24.09 per share. We considered several factors in determining to request additional shares for the 2025 Plan:

•Burn Rate. Burn rate shows how rapidly a company is depleting its shares reserved for issuance under its equity compensation plans. We define burn rate as the number of shares granted subject to awards under the Plan during the fiscal year divided by the weighted average number of shares of Common Stock outstanding during the relevant fiscal year. Assuming stockholder approval of the 2025 Plan, 3,293,462 shares will be available for future grants (which is the sum of the 3,275,000 additional shares and the 18,462 shares available as of the Record Date). Such shares would represent approximately 9.5% of our total outstanding common shares as of the Record Date.

The following table sets forth the burn rate under the Plan for the past three fiscal years:


	Restricted Stock Unit Grants	Option Grants	Total Shares Granted	Weighted Average Shares Outstanding	Burn Rate
Fiscal 2022	281,200	447,500	728,700	29,063,874	2.5	%
Fiscal 2023	63,000	923,500	986,500	29,863,280	3.3	%
Fiscal 2024	114,500	850,000	964,500	31,190,657	3.1	%
Average	152,833	740,667	893,500	30,039,261	3.0	%

We expect this new amount to last for approximately 3 years of awards. This estimate assumes that we continue our current practices of issuing grants. While we believe this modeling provides a reasonable estimate of how long such a share reserve would last, there are a number of factors that could impact our future actual equity share usage and the shares available under the 2025 Plan may last longer or shorter than 3 years.

•Overhang. An additional metric we use to measure the cumulative impact of the Plan is overhang. We define overhang as the sum of the number of shares subject to equity awards outstanding under the Plan at the end of the fiscal year and the shares available to be granted under the Plan as of the Record Date (together, the “Plan Shares”), divided by the sum of the total number of shares of Common Stock outstanding as of the Record Date, plus the Plan Shares. The total overhang resulting from the share request, including awards outstanding under all of our equity plans, represents approximately 9.6% of the shares of Common Stock outstanding as of the Record Date.

•Institutional Shareholder Policies. Given the significant institutional share ownership of Pennant, we consulted with certain shareholder advisory services in reviewing and updating the 2025 Plan.

Effect of Stockholder Approval of 2025 Plan

If stockholders approve the 2025 Plan, it will replace the version of the Plan that was approved by the Board prior to the spin-off from The Ensign Group, Inc. If stockholders do not approve the 2025 Plan as described herein, we will continue to use the Plan

as last approved prior to the spin-off. However, as described above, without the share increase proposed above, the shares that remain available for issuance under the Plan are insufficient to make full employee grants in 2025.

IMPORTANT PROVISIONS OF THE 2025 PLAN

The 2025 Plan contains many provisions that align with good governance practices and promote the interests of stockholders, including:

•No repricing of stock options or SARs (as defined below): Except as may be required to adjust for corporate restructuring, no stock option or SAR may be amended to reduce its initial exercise or grant price and no stock option or SAR shall be canceled and replaced with either cash or shares or with options or SARs having a lower exercise or grant price, without the approval of the stockholders.

•No discounted stock options or SARs: Stock options and SARs granted under the 2025 must have an exercise price of at least 100% of the fair market value of the Company’s stock on the date of grant.

•No liberal definition of “change in control”: The change in control provision in the 2025 Plan requires the consummation of a “Change in Control” and not merely the approval of a “change in control”.

•Limitation on amendments: The 2025 Plan may not be amended, without stockholder approval, in a manner that violates the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. (“NASD”) rules or regulations or any other securities exchange rules that are applicable to the Company, causes the Company to be unable to grant incentive stock options, increases the number of shares authorized under the Plan, or permits the award of stock options or SARs at a price that is less than 100% of the fair market value of the Company’s stock on the date of grant.

•Share accounting: The 2025 Plan includes a share accounting provision that reduces the number of shares available for issuance under the 2025 Plan by two shares for each share subject to a full value award such as a restricted stock award or restricted stock unit award.

•No liberal share recycling: The 2025 Plan does not allow crediting shares back to the 2025 Plan’s share reserve when such shares have been delivered under the Plan as payment of an option’s exercise price, to cover taxes on the payment of the award, repurchased by the Company using stock option exercise proceeds, or when such shares are counted against the share reserve only when the award is settled in shares.

•No dividends on unvested shares: The 2025 Plan prohibits payment of dividends and dividend equivalents on unvested awards that may result in payment of dividends or dividend equivalents on awards that are ultimately forfeited.

•Specific provisions relating to a change in control: The 2025 Plan includes a change in control vesting provision that sets forth the specific timing and manner of vesting of awards in connection with a change in control.

SUMMARY OF THE 2025 PLAN AS PROPOSED TO BE AMENDED AND RESTATED

A copy of the full text of the 2025 Plan is attached as Appendix B hereto, and the following description of the 2025 Plan is only intended to be a summary of its key provisions. Such summary is not intended to be a complete description of the 2025 Plan and is qualified in its entirety by the actual text of the 2025 Plan, which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. Reference to the “Plan” below shall mean the “2025 Plan”.

Eligibility

Our employees, officers, consultants, independent contractors, or directors providing services to Pennant or our affiliates, who the committee determines is an eligible person, will be eligible to receive awards under the Plan. In determining which eligible person will receive an award, the committee may take into account the nature of the services rendered by the respective eligible persons, their present and potential contributions to the success of Pennant or such other factors as the committee, in its discretion deem relevant. As of December 31, 2024, outstanding equity awards have been issued to approximately 170 of our approximately 7,000 employees, to fewer than 10 of our consultants and independent contractors, and to all seven of our non-employee directors under the Plan.

Term

If the 2025 Plan is approved by our stockholders at the Annual Meeting, it will be scheduled to terminate on May 16, 2035, unless we terminate it earlier. If stockholders do not approve the 2025 Plan, the Plan will expire on August 27, 2029, which is 10 years from the date the Board approved the Plan.

Award Forms and Limitations

The Plan authorizes the award of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance awards, dividend equivalents, other stock grants and other stock-based awards. A maximum of 3,293,462 shares will be authorized under the Plan if the 2025 Plan is approved. Awards granted as stock options or stock appreciation rights will reduce the number of shares available for issuance under the Plan on a one-for-one basis. Awards granted under the Plan as full value awards such as restricted stock or restricted stock unit awards will reduce the shares available for issuance under the Plan by two shares for each one share subject to an award. For stock options that are intended to qualify as incentive stock options (“ISOs”), under Section 422 of the Code, the maximum number of shares subject to ISO awards shall be 3,000,000.

Accounting for Awards

The shares subject to awards that are cancelled, forfeited, terminated or are not otherwise distributed shall immediately become available for grant and increase the Plan’s share reserve. Shares added back to the Plan’s share reserve shall be added back to such share reserve on the same basis and subject to the same ratio that applied when they were granted and shall increase the number of shares available for purposes of the Plan. Shares delivered under the Plan as payment of an option’s exercise price, to cover taxes on the payment of the award, repurchased by the Company using stock option exercise proceeds shall not be added back to the Plan’s share reserve. With respect to awards that may be settled in cash or shares, the shares payable under such awards shall be counted in full against the number of Shares available for Awards under the Plan (and shall not be added back to the Plan’s share reserve) regardless of whether such awards are actually settled in cash or shares.

Administration

The Plan will be administered by our Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee will have the authority to construe and interpret the Plan, grant awards and make all other determinations necessary or advisable for the administration of the Plan. Awards under the Plan may be made subject to performance conditions and other terms.

Stock Options

The Plan provides for the grant of stock options to officers and other employees intended to qualify as incentive stock options, as defined in Section 422 of the Code, as well as the grant of options to employees, consultants, independent contractors and directors that do not qualify as incentive stock options (that is, nonqualified stock options).

The holder of an option will be entitled to purchase a number of shares of Pennant common stock at a specified exercise price during a specified time period, all as determined by the Compensation Committee. The exercise price of an option generally will not be less than 100.0% of the fair market value of Pennant common stock on the date of grant, or in the case of incentive stock options, 110.0% of the fair market value of Pennant common stock with respect to holders of more than 10% of Pennant common stock.

The Compensation Committee may, however, set the exercise price of non-qualified stock options at less than 100% of the fair market value on the date of grant only if the committee expressly acknowledges in its granting resolutions that such option has been structured to be exempt from or compliant with the requirements of Section 409A.

The fair market value of Pennant common stock will be the closing sale price as quoted on Nasdaq on the date of grant. The Plan is expected to permit payment of the exercise price to be made by cash, shares of Pennant common stock, other securities, other awards or other property.

The shares subject to each option will generally vest in one or more installments over a specified period of service measured from the grant date. The term of an option or incentive stock option will be fixed by the committee at the time of grant, not to exceed 10 years from the date of grant, or in the case of a grant of an incentive stock option to a participant who, at the time such incentive stock option is granted, owns (within the meaning of Section 422 of the Code) stock possessing more than 10.0% of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock of Pennant or its affiliates, then such incentive stock options will expire and no longer be exercisable no later than 5 years from the date of grant.

Stock Appreciation Rights

Stock appreciation rights (“SARs”) provide for a payment, or payments, in cash or shares of Pennant common stock, to the holder based upon the difference between the fair market value of Pennant common stock on the date of exercise and the stated exercise price of the stock appreciation right.

The exercise price must be at least equal to the fair market value of Pennant common stock on the date the stock appreciation right is granted. Stock appreciation rights may vest based on time or achievement of performance conditions, as determined by the Compensation Committee in its discretion.

Restricted Stock and RSUs

The Compensation Committee may grant awards consisting of shares of Pennant common stock subject to restrictions on sale and transfer. The price (if any) paid by a participant for a restricted stock award will be determined by the Compensation Committee. Unless otherwise determined by the Compensation Committee at the time of award, vesting will cease on the date the participant no longer provides services to us and unvested shares will be forfeited to or repurchased by us. The Compensation Committee may condition the grant or vesting of shares of restricted stock on the achievement of performance conditions and/or the satisfaction of a time-based vesting schedule. The holder of restricted stock units will have the right, subject to any restrictions imposed by the committee, to receive shares of Pennant common stock at some future date determined by the committee. Dividends (that are paid by us to holders of shares of Pennant common stock) will not be paid on unvested stock awards, but may be accrued on unvested stock awards and paid upon vesting.

Performance Awards

A performance award is an award that becomes payable upon the attainment of specific performance goals. A performance award may become payable in cash or in shares of Pennant common stock. These awards are subject to forfeiture prior to settlement due to termination of a participant’s employment or failure to achieve the performance conditions. The performance goals to be achieved, the length of the performance period, the amount of the award, the amount of payment or transfer to be

made pursuant to the performance award, and any other terms and conditions of any performance award shall be determined by the committee.

Dividend Equivalents

The Compensation Committee will be able to grant dividend equivalents under which the participant is entitled to receive payments (in cash, shares of common stock, other securities, other awards or other property as determined in the discretion of the committee) equivalent to the amount of cash dividends paid by Pennant to holders of shares of Pennant common stock with respect to a number of shares of Pennant common stock determined by the committee. Dividend equivalents have terms and conditions as the committee shall determine except that all dividend equivalents are subject to the same vesting conditions as to the underlying award to which they are attached and will not be paid on unvested awards (though they may be accrued on unvested awards and paid upon vesting).

Non-Employee Director Stock Grant Program

Under the terms of the 2025 Plan, each non-employee director will receive a quarterly restricted stock grant on the 15th day of the month subsequent to quarter end and such shares shall vest over a three-year period, beginning with the first anniversary of the grant date (the Automatic Stock Grant Program). Such stock grant shall be determined annually by the Board and paid in equal quarterly installments. All unvested restricted stock grants will become fully vested on the date any such non-employee director ceases serving on the Board unless such director is removed for cause. Board members receiving stock grants must maintain ownership, during their tenure on the Board, of a minimum of thirty-three percent (33.0%) of the cumulative shares previously granted to him or her. The 2025 Plan includes an amendment specifying that the number of shares granted to directors under the Automatic Stock Grant Program is determined annually as described in the “Director Compensation” section of this Proxy Statement.

Other Stock Grants

The committee may grant awards of shares without restriction as deemed by the committee to be consistent with the purpose of the Plan.

Other Stock-Based Awards

The Compensation Committee may grant awards that are denominated or payable in, valued in whole or in part by reference to, or otherwise based on or related to, shares, as are deemed by the Compensation Committee to be consistent with the purpose of the Plan. Pennant common stock or other securities delivered pursuant to a purchase right may be paid by such method or methods as the committee determines. The value of such consideration, as established by the committee, must not be less than 100% of the fair market value of such Pennant common stock or other securities as of the date such purchase right is granted.

Additional Provisions

Transferability. Awards granted under the Plan may not be transferred in any manner other than by will or by the laws of descent and distribution, or as determined by our Compensation Committee. Unless otherwise restricted by our Compensation Committee, awards that are non-ISOs or SARs may be exercised during the lifetime of the optionee only by the optionee, the optionee’s guardian or legal representative or a family member of the optionee who has acquired the non-ISOs or SARs by a permitted transfer. Awards that are ISOs may be exercised during the lifetime of the optionee only by the optionee or the optionee’s guardian or legal representative.

Change in Control. In the event of a change in control (as defined in the Plan), awards that are not continued, converted, assumed, or replaced with a substantially similar award by the Company (or other successor entity remaining after the change in control) shall, with respect to time-based awards become fully vested and, with respect to performance-based awards, become earned at the target level and paid out on a prorated basis based on the elapsed length of the performance period preceding the change in control. The holders of such awards shall be entitled to receive the same change in control proceeds as any stockholder with respect to the number of shares subject to such vested and earned award (net of any exercise price). Awards that are assumed by the surviving entity following a change in control will continue to be administered in accordance with the terms of the Plan; provided if the Plan is terminated early after a change in control or a participant is terminated within one year following the change in control, participants will become vested in time based awards and will be entitled to a payout of performance-based awards at the target level on a pro-rated basis.

All awards will be equitably adjusted in the case of stock splits, recapitalizations and similar transactions.

Amendments to the Plan. The Board may amend, alter, suspend, discontinue or terminate the Plan at any time; provided, however, that, notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan, without stockholder approval, no such amendment, alteration, suspension, discontinuation or termination shall be made that, absent such approval, (i) violates the rules or regulations of the NASD or any other securities exchange that are applicable to the Company; (ii) causes the Company to be unable, under the Code, to grant ISOs under the Plan; (iii) increases the number of shares authorized under the Plan; or (iv) permits the award of options or SARs at a price less than 100% of the fair market value of a share on the date of grant of such option or SAR or the repricing of options or SARs, as prohibited by Section 6 of the Plan.

Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences

The following is a brief discussion of certain U.S. federal income tax consequences for awards granted under the Plan. The Plan is not subject to the requirements of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, and it is not, nor is it intended to be, qualified under Section 401(a) of the Code. This discussion is based on current law, is not intended to constitute

tax advice, and does not address all aspects of U.S. federal income taxation that may be relevant to a particular participant in light of his or her personal circumstances and does not describe foreign, state, or local tax consequences, which may be substantially different. Holders of awards under the Plan are encouraged to consult with their own tax advisors.

Non-Qualified Stock Options and Stock Appreciation Rights. With respect to non-qualified stock options and stock appreciation rights, (i) no income is realized by a participant at the time the award is granted; (ii) generally, at exercise, ordinary income is realized by the participant in an amount equal to the difference between the exercise or base price paid for the shares and the fair market value of the shares on the date of exercise (or, in the case of a cash-settled stock appreciation right, the cash received), and the participant’s employer is generally entitled to a tax deduction in the same amount subject to applicable tax withholding requirements; and (iii) upon a subsequent sale of the stock received on exercise, appreciation (or depreciation) after the date of exercise is treated as either short-term or long-term capital gain (or loss) depending on how long the shares have been held, and no deduction will be allowed to such participant’s employer.

Incentive Stock Options. No income is realized by a participant upon the grant or exercise of an incentive stock option, however, such participant will generally be required to include the excess of the fair market value of the shares at exercise over the exercise price in his or her alternative minimum taxable income. If shares are issued to a participant pursuant to the exercise of an incentive stock option, and if no disqualifying disposition of such shares is made by such participant within two years after the date of grant or within one year after the transfer of such shares to such participant, then (i) upon sale of such shares, any amount realized in excess of the exercise price will be taxed to such participant as a long-term capital gain, and any loss sustained will be a long-term capital loss, and (ii) no deduction will be allowed to the participant’s employer for federal income tax purposes. If shares acquired upon the exercise of an incentive stock option are disposed of prior to the expiration of either holding period described above, generally (i) the participant will realize ordinary income in the year of disposition in an amount equal to the excess (if any) of the fair market value of such shares at exercise (or, if less, the amount realized on the disposition of such shares) over the exercise price paid for such shares and (ii) the participant’s employer will generally be entitled to deduct such amount for federal income tax purposes. Any further gain (or loss) realized by the participant will be taxed as short term or long-term capital gain (or loss), as the case may be, and will not result in any deduction by the employer. Subject to certain exceptions for disability or death, if an incentive stock option is exercised more than three months following termination of employment, the exercise of the stock option will generally be taxed as the exercise of a non-qualified stock option.

Other Stock-Based Awards. The tax effects related to other stock-based awards under the Plan are dependent upon the structure of the particular award.

Withholding. At the time a participant is required to recognize ordinary compensation income resulting from an award, such income will be subject to federal (including, except as described below, Social Security and Medicare tax) and applicable state and local income tax and applicable tax withholding requirements. If such participant’s year-to-date compensation on the date of exercise exceeds the Social Security wage base limit for such year, such participant will not have to pay Social Security taxes on such amounts. Pennant is required to report to the appropriate taxing authorities the ordinary income received by the participant, together with the amount of taxes withheld to the Internal Revenue Service and the appropriate state and local taxing authorities.

Section 409A. Certain awards under the Plan may be subject to Section 409A of the Code, which regulates “nonqualified deferred compensation” (as defined in Section 409A of the Code). If an award under the Plan (or any other Pennant plan) that is subject to Section 409A of the Code is not administered in compliance with Section 409A of the Code, then all compensation under the Plan that is considered “nonqualified deferred compensation” (and awards under any other Pennant plan that are required pursuant to Section 409A of the Code to be aggregated with the award under the Plan) will be taxable to the participant as ordinary income in the year of the violation, or if later, the year in which the compensation subject to the award is no longer subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture. In addition, the participant will be subject to an additional tax equal to 20% of the compensation that is required to be included in income as a result of the violation, plus interest from the date that the compensation subject to the award was required to be included in taxable income.

Certain Rules Applicable to “Insiders.” As a result of the rules under Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act, depending upon the particular exemption from the provisions of Section 16(b) utilized, “insiders” (as defined in Section 16(b)) may not receive the same tax treatment as set forth above with respect to the grant and/or exercise or settlement of awards. Generally, insiders will not be subject to taxation until the expiration of any period during which they are subject to the liability provisions of Section 16(b) with respect to any particular award. Insiders should check with their own tax advisors to ascertain the appropriate tax treatment for any particular award.

Registration with the SEC

The Company intends to file a Registration Statement on Form S-8 relating to the issuance of shares under the 2025 Plan with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), after approval of the 2025 Plan by the Company’s stockholders.

New Plan Benefits

Because it is within the discretion of the Committee to determine which employees, non-employee directors and consultants will receive awards and the amount and type of such awards, it is not presently possible to determine the number of individuals to whom awards will be made in the future under the Plan or the amount of such awards.

PROPOSAL 4: APPROVAL OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT THE STOCKHOLDERS VOTE “FOR” RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP AS THE COMPANY’S INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR THE YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2025.

The Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the independent external audit firm retained to audit the Company’s financial statements. As a matter of good corporate governance, we are asking the stockholders to ratify the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP (“Deloitte”) as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2025. Deloitte has served as our auditor since 2019. The affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding common stock having voting power present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote will be required to ratify the appointment of Deloitte.

Stockholders are not required to ratify the appointment of Deloitte as our independent registered public accounting firm. If stockholders fail to ratify the appointment, the Audit Committee will consider whether or not to retain Deloitte. Even if the appointment is ratified, the Audit Committee may direct the appointment of a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in the best interests of the Company and our stockholders.

Representatives of Deloitte will be present at the Annual Meeting, will have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so, and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

We engaged Deloitte to provide audit services to us during fiscal year 2024. The following table sets forth the fees for services rendered by Deloitte for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023:


	2024		2023

Audit Fees(1)	$	1,449,198	$	1,201,770


All Other Fees(2)	1,895		1,895
Total	$	1,451,093	$	1,203,665


(1)			Audit fees include fees for professional services rendered in connection with the annual audit of the Company’s financial statements and the review of the Company’s interim financial statements included in quarterly reports, as well as fees for services that generally only the independent registered public accounting firm can be reasonably expected to provide, including comfort letters, consents, and review of registration statements filed with the SEC.
(2)			This amount represents subscription fees paid to Deloitte for use of an accounting research tool during the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023.

Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

Our Audit Committee approved all audit, audit-related, tax and other fees for services performed by our independent registered public accounting firm during 2024. The Audit Committee has adopted an Audit and Non-Audit Services Pre-Approval Policy (the “Audit Pre-Approval Policy”). The Audit Pre-Approval Policy provides for general pre-approval for a specified range of fees for certain categories of routine services to be provided during a given calendar year. This general pre-approval is automatically renewed at the beginning of each calendar year, unless otherwise determined by the Audit Committee. If the cost of any proposed service exceeds the amount for which general pre-approval has been established, specific pre-approval by the Audit Committee is required. Specific pre-approval of services is considered at the regular meetings of the Audit Committee. The Audit Pre-Approval Policy delegates authority to the Chairman of the Audit Committee to grant specific pre-approval between regularly scheduled Audit Committee meetings for audit and audit related services not to exceed $50,000 and all other services not to exceed $25,000. The Audit Pre-Approval Policy also establishes a list of prohibited non-audit services. In making all of its pre-approval determinations, the Audit Committee considers, among other things, whether such services are consistent with the rules promulgated by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (the “PCAOB”) and the SEC regarding auditor independence, whether the independent auditor is best positioned to provide the most effective and efficient service, and whether the service might enhance the Company’s ability to manage and control risk or improve audit quality. These and other factors are considered as a whole and no one factor is necessarily determinative.

Audit Committee Report

Our Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed with our management our audited consolidated financial statements and the establishment and maintenance of internal controls over financial reporting and has discussed with our independent registered public accounting firm the matters required to be discussed by the applicable requirements of the PCAOB and the SEC. Our Audit Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from our independent registered public accounting firm required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the independent accountant’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and has discussed with the independent accountant the independent accountant’s independence. Our Audit Committee has also considered whether the provision of non-audit services provided to us by our independent registered public accounting firm is compatible with maintaining its independence and has discussed with the auditors such auditors’ independence.

Based on its review, our Audit Committee recommended to our Board of Directors that the audited financial statements for the Company’s year ended December 31, 2024 be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024, which was filed on February 27, 2025.

Respectfully submitted by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors,

Mr. Scott E. Lamb, Chair

Dr. John G. Nackel, Ph.D.

Dr. Gregory K. Morris, M.D.

Members of the Audit Committee

The Audit Committee Report does not constitute soliciting material, and shall not be deemed to be filed or incorporated by reference into any Company filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates the Audit Committee Report by reference therein.

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Below is biographical information for each of our current executive officers as of March 18, 2025, other than Brent Guerisoli (whose biographical information is shown under “Directors and Nominees” above). Each executive officer serves at the discretion of the Board of Directors and the Chief Executive Officer.


Name	Age	Position

Brent J. Guerisoli	44	Chief Executive Officer
Lynette B. Walbom	47	Chief Financial Officer
John J. Gochnour	42	Chief Operating Officer and President
Kirk S. Cheney	43	EVP, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary
Jason P. Steik	41	Chief Clinical Officer

Lynette B. Walbom was appointed Chief Financial Officer of the Company on May 22, 2023. Prior to joining Pennant, Ms. Walbom was Vice President of Financial Reporting and Tax for Raising Cane’s Restaurants, LLC, a national restaurant chain operating in 35 states, which more than doubled in size—based on number of restaurants and geographic footprint—during her tenure. At Raising Cane’s, from 2016 to 2023, Ms. Walbom had broad responsibility for financial reporting, acquisitions, tax, accounting systems, and equity management. From 2003 to 2016, Ms. Walbom was Chief Financial Officer of a family office with investments in companies in several industries, including financial services, software development, real estate development and franchising. Ms. Walbom began her over 25-year career in accounting as a public company auditor at Deloitte. Ms. Walbom received her B.S. degree in accounting from Northern Arizona University—The W.A. Franke College of Business and is a certified public accountant.

John J. Gochnour was appointed Chief Operating Officer of Pennant upon its formation in 2019 and was appointed President of Pennant on August 1, 2022. As President and Chief Operating Officer, Mr. Gochnour oversees the Company’s operations across the country and leads Cornerstone Healthcare, the Company’s home health and hospice segment. In this role, John has contributed to the Company’s dramatic organic and inorganic growth, along with its successful clinical, cultural and financial performance. Prior to the formation of Pennant, Mr. Gochnour served as Executive Vice President and General Counsel of Cornerstone since January 2013. Mr. Gochnour played a critical role in the acquisition and integration efforts of Cornerstone and Ensign’s other new business ventures, by sourcing, negotiating and helping to integrate acquisitions across 12 states and multiple industries. Mr. Gochnour also founded the Cornerstone Service Center, which provides consulting and management services in the areas of finance, legal, human resources, and information technology to operations across the Cornerstone platform. Prior to joining Cornerstone, Mr. Gochnour was an attorney at the law firm Paul Hastings LLP in Costa Mesa, California, where he litigated complex civil disputes and advised clients related to risk management, general liability, and employment issues. Mr. Gochnour received his law degree from the Duke University School of Law.

Kirk S. Cheney is Pennant’s Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary. In this role, Mr. Cheney oversees acquisitions and government relations, along with the legal, regulatory, and risk management functions of the Company. He also plays a key role leading the Company’s Service Center to help ensure that its performance accelerates Pennant’s overall results. Mr. Cheney joined the Pennant Group in 2019 and was appointed an Executive Vice President in March 2025. Prior to Pennant, Mr. Cheney served as General Counsel for Click Sales, Inc., a technology company that provides payment attribution and processing for online sales. Previously, Mr. Cheney practiced corporate law at the international and national law firms of Vinson & Elkins, LLP and Holland & Hart, LLP, where he counseled clients on litigation matters, corporate transactions, and debt restructuring and investments. Mr. Cheney received his law degree from Yale Law School, where he was an editor of the Yale Law Journal.

Jason P. Steik is the Chief Clinical Officer of the Company. Since 2020, Mr. Steik has led the Company’s clinical and quality teams, helping set Pennant apart as the provider of choice in its local communities. Mr. Steik has a broad spectrum of healthcare leadership experience, including serving as Chief Nursing Officer of a regional Acute Care Medical Center for LifePoint Health from 2018 to 2020. Mr. Steik previous experience includes Emergency, Trauma, and Heart & Vascular department leadership. Mr. Steik is a Certified Professional in Patient Safety (CPPS) through the Institute for Healthcare Improvement. With more than 15 years of acute and post-acute care experience, Mr. Steik is passionate about bridging the acute to post-acute spectrum of care and bringing high quality, compassionate healthcare into the home. Mr. Steik received his Bachelor of Science in Nursing degree from Boise State University and his Master of Business Administration from the University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis explains the key elements of our executive compensation program and compensation decisions regarding the following named executive officers (“NEOs”) for 2024:


Name						Position

Brent J. Guerisoli						Chief Executive Officer
Lynette B. Walbom						Chief Financial Officer
John J. Gochnour						Chief Operating Officer and President
Kirk S. Cheney						Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary
Jason P. Steik						Chief Clinical Officer

The following discussion and analysis provides information regarding our executive compensation objectives and principles, procedures, practices and decisions and is provided to help give perspective to the numbers and narratives that follow in the tables in this section. This discussion will focus on our objectives, principles, practices and decisions with regard to the compensation of the executive officers that participate in our executive officer compensation plan.

Compensation Policy and Objectives

We believe that compensation paid to our executive officers should be closely aligned with our performance and the performance of each individual executive officer on both a short-term and a long-term basis, based upon the value each executive officer provides to our Company, and designed to assist us in attracting and retaining the best possible executive talent, which we believe is critical to our long-term success. Because we believe that compensation should be structured to ensure that a significant portion of compensation earned by executives will be closely related to factors that directly and indirectly influence stockholder value, the “at risk” compensation of our executive officers generally constitutes a large portion of their total compensation potential. In addition, commensurate with our belief that those of our employees who behave like owners should have the opportunity to become owners, our executive officers typically have a significant level of stock ownership, which we believe aligns the incentives of the executive officers with the priorities of our stockholders. To that end, it is the view of our Board of Directors and the Compensation Committee that the total compensation program for executive officers should consist of the following:

•Base salary;

•Annual and other short-term cash bonuses;

•Long-term incentive compensation; and

•Certain other benefits.

The Compensation’ Committee believes that our executive compensation program has been appropriately designed to provide a level of incentives that do not encourage our NEOs to take unnecessary risks in managing their respective functions. As discussed above, a substantial portion of our NEOs’ compensation is performance-based, consistent with our approach to executive compensation. Our annual incentive compensation program is designed to reward annual financial and/or strategic performance in areas considered critical to our short- and long-term success. In addition, we measure performance on a variety of bonus criteria other than our profit to determine an executive’s annual incentive compensation award, such as clinical quality standards, positive survey and audit results, good corporate governance practices, leadership development, positive patient feedback and feedback from other employees regarding such executive’s performance. We believe this discourages risk-taking that focuses excessively on short-term profits at the sacrifice of our long-term health. Likewise, our long-term equity incentive awards are directly aligned with long-term stockholder interests through their link to our stock price and multi-year ratable vesting schedules. In combination, the Compensation Committee believes that the various elements of our executive compensation program sufficiently tie our executives’ compensation opportunities to our focus on sustained long-term growth and performance.

The Compensation Committee’s charter enables the Compensation Committee to retain a compensation consultant, legal counsel, or other adviser (a “Compensation Adviser”). The Compensation Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, and oversight of any such Compensation Adviser. In establishing our executive compensation

packages, the Compensation Committee may generally review relevant market data of executives of companies in the healthcare services industry based on publicly available information.

The Compensation Committee may select, or receive advice from, a Compensation Adviser only after conducting the independence assessment of such Compensation Advisor, as outlined in Nasdaq listing standards and SEC rules.

The Company engages periodically with a Compensation Adviser to review and advise the Compensation Committee on the Company’s executive compensation. The Compensation Adviser analyzes target total compensation paid to our NEOs and certain other key leaders, including their base cash compensation, cash incentive compensation, and equity compensation in comparison to peer companies. The Compensation Adviser notes similarities and differences among peer companies, provides insight into appropriate compensation considerations, and assesses the effectiveness of the Company’s executive compensation plan to attract and retain talented executives. The data and recommendations of the Compensation Adviser is used by the Compensation Committee to help inform total compensation targets for the Company’s executives. Based on this review process, and the Committee’s own consideration and analysis, our Compensation Committee concluded that the Company’s executive compensation is reasonable and appropriate in relation to peer companies. The Compensation Committee did not retain a Compensation Adviser relating to executive compensation in 2024, but did reference compensation studies performed for the Company previously.

The Compensation Committee supports the Company’s commitment to administer compensation equitably without regard to race, color, religion, gender, gender identity or expression, sexual orientation, national origin, genetics, disability, age, or veteran status.

Principal Economic Elements of Executive Compensation

Base Salary. We believe it is important to pay our executives salaries within a competitive market range in order to attract and retain highly talented executives. Although historically we have not set executive salaries based upon any particular benchmarks, we may from time to time generally review relevant market data to assist us in our compensation decision process. We believe that the base salaries and the total compensation of our executives are comparable to the median total compensation of executives with similar positions at comparable companies. Each of our executives’ base salary is generally determined based upon job responsibilities, individual experience and the value the executive provides to our Company. The Compensation Committee considered each of these factors in determining the compensation each executive would be paid in 2024. We may elect to change this practice in future years. The decision, if any, to materially increase or decrease an executive’s base salary in subsequent years will likely be based upon these same factors and others recommended by a compensation consultant, if any. Our Compensation Committee makes decisions regarding base salary at the time the executive is hired, and makes decisions regarding any changes to base salary on an annual basis.

Annual Cash Bonuses. We establish an executive incentive program each year, pursuant to which certain executives may earn annual bonuses based upon our performance under the criteria set forth in our executive compensation plan. Historically, in the first quarter of each year, our Compensation Committee identifies the plan’s participants for the year and establishes an objective formula by which the amount, if any, of the plan’s bonus pool will be determined. The committee also has the discretion to allocate the bonus pool among the individual executives prior to the end of the year and any such early allocation will remain subject to further adjustments upon the final determination of the bonus pool calculations during the first quarter of each year. The bonus pool is also adjusted to include governance and other performance criteria that can increase or decrease the bonus pool based on the achievement of a pre-established target.

Our Compensation Committee established the following formula for the 2024 bonus pool:


Adjusted Annual Earnings Before Taxes1 (“AEBT”) in 2024						Bonus Pool

For AEBT up to $15.6 million						$—
For AEBT greater than $15.6 million, but less than $16.1 million						AEBT between $15.6 million and $16.1 million * 5.0%
For AEBT greater than $16.1 million, but less than $17.1 million						$0.025 million + (amount of AEBT between $16.1 million and $17.1 million * 7.5%)
For AEBT greater than $17.1 million, but less than $18.6 million						$0.1 million + (amount of AEBT between $17.1 million and $18.6 million * 10.0%)
For AEBT greater than $18.6 million, but less than $20.6 million						$0.25 million + (amount of AEBT between $18.6 million and $20.6 million * 12.5%)
For AEBT greater than $20.6 million						$0.4 million + (amount of AEBT over $20.6 million * 15.0%)


(1)						The bonus pool was based on non-GAAP AEBT. AEBT is defined as net income before (a) costs incurred for start-up operations, including rent and excluding depreciation, (b) share-based compensation expense, (c) non-capitalizable acquisition related costs and credit allowances, (d) costs associated with transitioning operations, (e) usual, non-recurring or redundant charges, and (f) net income attributable to noncontrolling interest.

Based on performance, the executive bonus pool formula above is adjusted for the following: 1) if AEBT declines from prior year levels, the lowest target boundary will increase by 10-20%; 2) if AEBT increases by 5% or less compared to the prior year levels, then the lowest target boundary will increase by 5%; and 3) if AEBT declines by 5% or more, then the Compensation Committee may reduce the incentive paid under the plan by as much as 100%. AEBT, as a measure, is more fully described and reconciled to the nearest GAAP measures on pages 35-36 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K dated February 27, 2025.

Historically, in the first quarter of the subsequent year, our Compensation Committee allocates the bonus pool among the participating executives based upon each participating executive’s contribution to our financial, clinical and governance performance during the preceding year, and value to the organization going forward.

The clinical measures that our Compensation Committee consider include our success in achieving positive survey results, hospice composite measure trends, and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ five-star home health rating. The governance measures that our Compensation Committee considers includes culture of the organization, strategic organizational development, risk management and leadership development throughout the organization. Our Compensation Committee reviews each participating executive’s performance including the financial, clinical and governance measures with consideration of feedback from other employees and may, at its discretion, allocate more or less to the bonus pool, at any time during the fiscal year or during the subsequent year’s first quarter review. Our Compensation Committee exercises discretion in the allocation of the bonus pool among the participating executives. We allocate executive bonus compensation between cash and non-cash compensation, such that if the total executive pool is greater than a specified amount, for every dollar greater than the stated amount, half of the incentive will be paid in cash and half will be paid in fully vested restricted stock awards. As the bonus pool exceeded the stated amount (which was $3.5 million for 2024), a portion of the total executive incentive was paid in cash and a portion was paid in restricted stock.

The Compensation Committee determined, based on the adjusted predetermined formula, that the bonus pool for 2024, including adjustments to the bonus pool approved by our Compensation Committee based on clinical performance, leadership development, and growth, was $4.0 million. Incentive performance bonuses for 2024 were allocated to the executive officers who participated in the executive incentive program as follows: Mr. Guerisoli, $1,600,000 in cash and $106,657 in restricted stock; Mr. Gochnour, $1,250,000 in cash and $83,338 in restricted stock; and Ms. Walbom, $900,000 in cash and $59,997 in restricted stock. Messers. Cheney and Steik received incentive pay separate from the program outlined above. Mr. Cheney’s cash incentive pay of $500,850 was based on the Company’s performance, his successful leadership of the Service Center, and his contributions to key initiatives in the year, including the Company’s credit refinancing, equity offering, acquisitions and other strategic partnerships. Mr. Steik participated in an incentive program tied to the financial and clinical performance of the Company’s home health and hospice segment and was awarded a cash incentive bonus for 2024 of $472,200. The bonus program for the Company’s home health and hospice segment is structured similarly to the executive bonus pool described above with metrics and targets specific to that operating segment.

Each year, our Compensation Committee reviews our financial performance goals and may adjust the bonus pool formula at its discretion to better align the amount available for annual executive bonuses with our objectives. The Compensation Committee may increase the amount of adjusted annual income that must be achieved in order to create the same bonus pool as the preceding year in order to increase the difficulty of receiving the same bonus. The allocation of this bonus pool to the participating executives remains discretionary based upon the Compensation Committee’s determination of each participating executive’s contribution to our annual performance and value to the organization going forward. The 2024 financial performance goals and bonus pool formula were established by the Compensation Committee consistent with historical practices. In addition, the Compensation Committee can (and is some cases, must) “clawback” certain performance-based compensation paid to our executives under our executive incentive plan in certain circumstances where there has been a restatement of the Company’s financial results or where subsequent events diminish the performance metrics, including clinical results, upon which the incentive payments were based.

Long-Term Incentive Compensation. We believe that long-term performance is achieved through an ownership culture. Accordingly, we encourage long-term performance by our executives and other key personnel throughout the organization through the use of stock-based awards. We have adopted an equity incentive plan that permits the grant of stock, stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance awards, and other stock-based awards. Historically, we have generally issued stock options and, less frequently, restricted stock under this plan.

In order to preserve the link between the interests of executives and other key personnel and those of stockholders, we generally grant stock awards to those executives and others who have performed at a high level and have demonstrated qualities of an ownership culture. Our executives who have significant levels of stock ownership are not permitted to hedge the economic risk of such ownership. We intend to continue to provide long-term awards through the granting of stock based awards.

Except with respect to grants to our directors and other stock grants issued pursuant to the executive incentive plan, the stock options and restricted stock awards that we grant generally vest over five years (20% on each anniversary of the grant date). If a recipient’s employment with us terminates, then the stock options and restricted stock that remain unvested as of the date of the termination of the recipient’s employment will be forfeited without compensation. Until vested, the stock options and

restricted stock may not be transferred, and vested options and shares shall be subject to our insider trading policy. Stock options generally have a maximum term of ten years. The grant dates of our stock options and restricted stock awards are generally the date our Board of Directors or Compensation Committee meets to approve such stock option grants or restricted stock awards. Our Board of Directors or Compensation Committee historically has approved stock-based awards at regularly scheduled meetings. Our Board of Directors and Compensation Committee intend to continue this practice of approving the majority of stock-based awards at regularly scheduled meetings on a quarterly basis, unless earlier approval is required for a new-hire inducement or position change grant; regardless of whether or not our Board of Directors or Compensation Committee knows material non-public information on such date. The exercise price of our stock options is the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant as determined by the closing price of our common stock on the Nasdaq Stock Market on the date of grant. Prior to the exercise of an option, the holder has no rights as a stockholder with respect to the shares of common stock underlying the option, including voting rights and the right to receive dividends or dividend equivalents.

Our Chief Executive Officer historically has made recommendations to our Compensation Committee and Board of Directors regarding the amount of stock options and other compensation to grant to our other executives based upon his assessment of their performance, and may continue to do so in the future. Our executive officers, however, do not have any role in determining the timing of our stock option grants.

Although we do not have any formal policy for determining the amount of stock-based awards or the timing of our stock-based awards, we have historically granted stock options or restricted stock to high-performing employees (i) in recognition of their individual achievements and contributions to our Company, and (ii) in anticipation of their future service and achievements. We may in the future introduce a more formal plan.

Other Compensation. Our executives are eligible to receive the same benefits that are available to similarly situated employees, including the premiums paid to provide life insurance equal to each executive’s annual salary and the premiums to provide accidental death and dismemberment insurance. Certain of our executives also receive allowances for automobiles and third-party tax services.

Compensation Committee Report

The Compensation Committee has reviewed the foregoing Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis with our management. Based on such review and discussions with management, the Compensation Committee recommended to our Board that the foregoing Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement and incorporated by reference into our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024.

Respectfully submitted by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors,

Dr. John G. Nackel, Ph.D., Chair

Ms. JoAnne Stringfield

Mr. Stephen M. R. Covey

Members of the Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee Report does not constitute soliciting material, and shall not be deemed to be filed or incorporated by reference into any Company filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates the Compensation Committee Report by reference therein.

Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to compensation for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2023 and 2024, earned by, awarded to, or paid to our NEOs.


Name and Principal Position	Year	Salary ($)	Bonus ($)(1)	Stock Awards ($)(2)	Option Awards ($)(3)	Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)(4)	All Other Compensation ($)(5)	Total ($)

Brent J. Guerisoli Chief Executive Officer	2024	415,304	—	106,657	463,355	1,600,000	8,764	2,594,080
	2023	362,500	—	—	497,136	1,000,000	8,884	1,868,520
	2022	295,834	—	604,350	150,650	500,000	8,447	1,559,281
Lynette B. Walbom Chief Financial Officer	2024	311,490	—	59,997	324,348	900,000	3,032	1,598,867
	2023	206,250	—	—	183,542	350,000	75,400	815,192

John J. Gochnour President and Chief Operating Officer	2024	344,711	—	83,338	370,684	1,250,000	9,461	2,058,194
	2023	316,668	—	—	369,754	800,000	8,713	1,495,135
	2022	273,541	—	537,200	60,260	458,702	9,941	1,339,644
Kirk S. Cheney EVP, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary	2024	264,150	500,850	—	185,342	—	1,282	951,624
	2023	250,000	250,512	—	212,304	—	238	713,054
	2022	213,031	90,000	188,020	24,095	—	188	515,334
Jason P. Steik Chief Clinical Officer	2024	269,344	472,200	82,000	185,342	—	1,708	1,010,594
	2023	257,726	250,000	—	212,304	—	966	720,996
	2022	236,667	82,500	188,020	12,052	—	919	520,158


(1)						Represents amounts earned under discretionary incentive programs other than the executive incentive program in the corresponding year but paid in the first quarter of the following year.
(2)						The annual amounts shown are the amounts of total compensation cost which will be recognized over the five year vesting period related to stock awards which were granted during the year ended December 31, 2024, as a result of the adoption of ASC 718. These awards vest over five years. For a discussion of valuation and forfeiture assumptions, see Note 12, Options and Awards, in our consolidated financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024.
(3)						The annual amounts shown are the amounts of total compensation cost which will be recognized over the five year vesting period related to options to purchase common stock which were granted during the year ended December 31, 2024, as a result of the adoption of ASC 718. These awards are not immediately exercisable and vest over five years. For a discussion of valuation and forfeiture assumptions, see Note 12, Options and Awards, in our consolidated financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024.
(4)						Represents amounts earned under the executive incentive program in the corresponding year but paid in the first quarter of the following year.
(5)						Details about the amounts in the “All Other Compensation” column for fiscal year 2024 are set forth in the table below:


Name	Car Allowance ($)	Tax Preparation ($)	Other Benefits(a) ($)	Total All Other Compensation ($)

Brent J. Guerisoli	7,177	1,145	442	8,764
Lynette B. Walbom	—	1,965	1,067	3,032
John J. Gochnour	7,177	1,285	999	9,461
Kirk S. Cheney	—	—	1,282	1,282
Jason P. Steik	—	840	868	1,708

(a) Other benefits consist of cell phone allowances, insurance, and miscellaneous benefits

Pay Versus Performance

The following table sets forth certain information required by Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K (“PvP Rules”). For a better understanding of how our Compensation Committee evaluates and sets executive compensation, please see the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” (“CD&A”) above.

Pursuant to the PvP Rules, the pay versus performance table (“PvP Table”) (set forth below) is required to include, for each year, the compensation actually paid (“CAP”) for the principal executive officer (“PEO”) and the average CAP for Non-PEO NEOs. CAP represents a new calculation of compensation that differs significantly from the Summary Compensation Table ("SCT") calculation of compensation presented in the CD&A, as well as from the way in which the Compensation Committee makes annual compensation decisions, as discussed in the CD&A. For example, the CAP calculation for a given year includes the change in fair value of multiple years of equity grants that are outstanding and unvested during the year, whereas the Summary Compensation Table calculation includes only the grant date fair value of equity awards that are granted during the year. These differences result in a CAP calculation that may be higher or lower than the corresponding Summary Compensation Table calculation, and that also may be more significantly impacted by changes in stock price. Outstanding equity awards may be represented in more than one year of the PvP Table.

Pay Versus Performance Table

The following table and footnotes set forth required compensation information for our PEO and our other Non-PEO NEOs (averaged) along with total shareholder return, net income, and Adjusted net income performance results for fiscal 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, and 2020.


Year	Summary Compensation Table Total for Current PEO	Summary Compensation Table Total for Prior PEO	Compensation Actually Paid to Current PEO	Compensation Actually Paid to Prior PEO	Average Summary Comp. Table Total for Non-PEO NEOs	Average Comp. Actually Paid to Non-PEO NEOs	Year-end value of $100 invested on 1/1/2020 in:		Net Income (in millions)	Adjusted Net Income (in millions)
							Pennant Group	Industry Peer Group
	($)(1)	($)(1)	($)(1).(2)	($)(1).(2)	($)(1)	($)(1).(2)	($)(3)	($)(3)	($)(4)	($)(5)
2024	2,594,080	N/A	4,498,032	N/A	1,404,820	2,228,066	80	117	24	30
2023	1,868,520	N/A	2,388,485	N/A	820,652	1,018,223	42	106	14	22
2022	1,559,281	(3,296,796)	700,092	(14,325,297)	828,145	145,181	33	92	7	17
2021	N/A	348,668	N/A	(41,376,946)	601,733	(2,359,016)	70	103	2	14
2020	N/A	1,082,194	N/A	30,882,515	1,327,738	3,644,011	176	130	16	23

(1)