SEC Form DEF 14A filed by UFP Industries Inc.

(RULE 14a-101)

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

 

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Filed by the Registrant ☒

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  ☐

Check the appropriate box:

 ☐ Preliminary Proxy Statement

 ☐ Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

☒ Definitive Proxy Statement

 ☐ Definitive Additional Materials

 ☐ Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12

(Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

☒ No fee required.

 ☐ Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

 ☐ Fee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

The 2026 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of UFP Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) will be held at 3310 Eagle Park Dr NE, Grand Rapids, MI 49525, on Wednesday, April 22, 2026, at 8:30 a.m. EDT (registration begins at 8:00 a.m. EDT) for the following purposes:

These business items are described more fully in the accompanying proxy statement.

Shareholders of record at the close of business on February 27, 2026, are entitled to notice of and to vote at the meeting. To vote by telephone, shareholders of record may call toll-free on a touch-tone telephone, 1-800-690-6903, enter the control number located on their proxy card or Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, and follow the recorded instructions. To vote via the Internet, shareholders of record may go to www.proxyvote.com, enter the control number located on their proxy card or Notice, and follow the instructions provided.

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on April 22, 2026. The Company’s notice of and proxy statement for the 2026 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and the annual report to shareholders for the fiscal year ended December 27, 2025, are available free of charge at www.proxyvote.com.

R. Paul Guerre,

Corporate Secretary

UFP Industries, Inc.

Annual Meeting of Shareholders

The following is information regarding the meeting and the voting process, presented in a question-and-answer format. As used in this proxy statement, the terms “the Company,” “we,” “our” and “us” all refer to UFP Industries, Inc. and its subsidiaries.

As of February 27, 2026, the Record Date for the Annual Meeting, we had issued and outstanding 56,799,895 shares of common stock. Shareholders are entitled to one vote for each share of our common stock registered in their names as of the close of business on the Record Date. Votes cast at the meeting and submitted by proxy are counted by the inspectors of the meeting, who are appointed by us.

The following table sets forth information as to each shareholder known to have been the beneficial owner of more than five percent (5%) of our outstanding shares of common stock as of February 27, 2026.

Our Board currently consists of eight members. These members are divided into three classes of equal number (if the total number of directors is divisible by three), with the classes to hold office for staggered terms of three years each. Our Board has nominated Mary Tuuk Kuras to a two-year term expiring at our 2028 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Benjamin J. McLean, Michael G. Wooldridge, and Ronald K. Grubbs, Jr. to three-year terms expiring at our 2029 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. The election of all four nominees will increase the size of our Board from eight to nine members. As incumbent directors, Ms. Tuuk Kuras and Messrs. McLean and Wooldridge were previously elected by our shareholders.

The persons named as proxies in the accompanying proxy will vote to elect the above-named nominees as directors, unless a shareholder directs them differently by proxy. If a nominee is not available for election as a director at the time of the Annual Meeting (a situation which is not now anticipated), the Board may provide for a lesser number of directors or designate a substitute nominee. In the latter case, shares represented by proxies will be voted for the substitute nominee. The proxies cannot be voted for a greater number of persons than the number of nominees named.

Except in a contested election, the vote required for the election of a nominee as a director is the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast in the election of that nominee. A “majority of the votes cast” means that the number of votes cast “for” a nominee’s election must exceed the number of votes cast “against” that nominee’s election. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not be treated as votes cast either “for” or “against” that nominee’s election and will have no effect on the outcome. The election of directors is considered non-routine under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange. Consequently, if you hold your shares in street name, then unless otherwise instructed by you, brokerage firms, banks, and other nominees cannot vote your shares on the election of a nominee. In a contested election, directors are elected by a plurality of the votes cast at a meeting of shareholders. An election is considered contested if there are more nominees for election than positions on the Board of Directors to be filled by election at that meeting.

In any non-contested election of directors, any incumbent director nominee who receives a greater number of votes cast against his or her election than in favor of his or her election is required to immediately tender his or her resignation to the Board. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will make a recommendation to the Board on whether to accept or reject the resignation or whether other action should be taken. The Board will act on the Committee’s recommendation and publicly disclose its decision within 90 days from the date of the certification of the election results for that meeting.

The following table provides certain biographical information for each person who is nominated for election as a director at our Annual Meeting and for each person who is continuing as an incumbent director. The information was provided to us as of February 27, 2026, by the respective nominees and directors.

Our Board is committed to sound and effective corporate governance practices. The Board has documented those practices in our Corporate Governance Principles (the “Principles”). These Principles address director qualifications, director responsibilities, periodic performance evaluations, and a variety of other corporate governance matters. The Principles also require the Board to have an Audit Committee, a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and a Personnel and Compensation Committee. The Principles, along with the charters of each of these committees, are available for review on our website at www.ufpi.com under the tabs “Investor Relations → Governance.”

We adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to our employees, officers, and directors. We also adopted a Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers. Each Code is posted on our website at www.ufpi.com under the tabs “Investor Relations → Governance.” Any changes to or waivers of either Code for our chief executive officer or senior financial officers will be disclosed on our website at www.ufpi.com under the tabs “Investor Relations → Governance.”

As required by the Principles, our Board has determined each of the following directors to be an “independent director” under the Nasdaq Stock Market Rules (the “Nasdaq Standard”): Joan A. Budden, Benjamin J. McLean, Thomas W. Rhodes, Mary Tuuk Kuras, Brian C. Walker, and Michael G. Wooldridge. Our Board had made the same determination with respect to William G. Currie and Bruce A. Merino before their retirement from our Board at the 2025 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. There are no family relationships between or among the directors and our executive officers.

To assist our Board, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reviewed the applicable legal standards for director and board committee independence, as well as the criteria applied to determine “audit committee financial expert” status and the answers to annual questionnaires completed by each of the directors. Based on this review, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee delivered a report to the full Board, and the Board made its independence and “audit committee financial expert” determinations based upon that report.

The effectiveness of each of our directors is monitored using an annual assessment. Our Board does not have a mandatory retirement age policy, although the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers a director’s tenure with the Company as a factor in nominating incumbent directors. We believe that the ability of a Board member to add value to the Company is not dependent on age; rather, it is based on the director’s actual performance. As a result, we expect that some directors will not serve until a typical retirement age, while others may serve longer. In addition, we evaluate the tenure of individual directors as well as the collective tenure of our Board. In connection with this evaluation, we strive to maintain a balanced composition of relatively new and meaningful tenured directors with the objective of fostering the input of new ideas and thoughts while maintaining a strong historical perspective and deep understanding of our business and the markets we serve.

Each member of the Audit Committee is “independent” under the Nasdaq Standard as well as the applicable rules of the SEC for audit committee membership. Our Board has determined that each of Mr. McLean, Ms. Tuuk Kuras, and Mr. Walker qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert,” as defined in Item 407(d) of Regulation S-K of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). The full responsibilities of the Audit Committee are set forth in the Audit Committee Charter. In general, the primary purpose of this Committee is to assist the Board in overseeing management’s conduct of our financial reporting processes and system of internal controls regarding finance, accounting, legal compliance, and ethics. During 2025, the Audit Committee held four meetings.

Each member of this Committee is “independent” under the Nasdaq Standard. The Committee is responsible for reviewing and recommending to the Board the timing and amount of compensation for the Chief Executive Officer, including salary, bonus, incentive, and other equity compensation, as well as director compensation. This Committee is also responsible for reviewing succession planning for our Chief Executive Officer, as well as administering our equity-based incentive plans and reviewing and approving the annual compensation of our senior executive officers. The Committee has the authority to retain consultants and third-party advisors for assistance. The Committee has the ultimate authority to determine matters of executive compensation for our senior executive officers other than the Chief Executive Officer, whose compensation is subject to full Board approval; however, the Committee may rely upon recommendations of our Chief Executive Officer for matters of compensation for officers and Named Executives, other than the Chief Executive Officer. Additional information on the Committee’s role and practices involving executive compensation is described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis in this proxy statement. The full responsibilities of the Personnel and Compensation Committee are set forth in its Charter. During 2025, the Personnel and Compensation Committee held two meetings.

Our Personnel and Compensation Committee during fiscal 2025 consisted of Thomas W. Rhodes (Chair), Joan A. Budden, Bruce A. Merino, who retired from this Committee at the 2025 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, Brian C. Walker, and Michael G. Wooldridge. None of the foregoing is or has been an officer or employee of the Company or has had any relationship with the Company that is required to be disclosed in this proxy statement as a related party transaction. In addition, during 2025, no executive officer of the Company served as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of any other entity that has or has had one or more executive officers serving as a member of our Board of Directors or Personnel and Compensation Committee.

Each member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is “independent” under the Nasdaq Standard. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers and proposes director nominees to the Board for election by our shareholders or to fill Board vacancies as they may occur, makes recommendations to the Board regarding Board committee memberships, generally monitors our corporate governance practices, and performs any other functions or duties deemed appropriate by our Board. The full responsibilities of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are set forth in its Charter. The Committee and Board adopted a Policy Governing Director Qualifications and Nominations, the details of which are described below, which include certain minimum qualification and board composition standards. The Committee is responsible for succession planning for Board members. In view of the age and tenure of certain members of the Board, the Committee has been active in seeking and evaluating qualified candidates, consistent with the Policy Governing Director Qualifications and Nominations, to serve on the Board. This Committee is also responsible for overseeing the Company’s strategies and policies with respect to various environmental, social and governance (ESG) matters, including oversight of the Company’s related disclosure obligations. During 2025, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee held two meetings.

Our Articles of Incorporation contain certain procedural requirements applicable to shareholder nominations of directors. A shareholder who wishes to nominate a person to serve as a director must provide us with written notice. The notice must include: (1) the name and address of both the shareholder who intends to make the nomination and the person or persons nominated; (2) a representation that the shareholder is a current holder of record, will continue to hold those shares through the date of the meeting, and intends to appear in person or by proxy at the meeting; (3) a description of all arrangements between the shareholder and each nominee; (4) the information regarding each nominee as would be required to be included in a proxy statement filed under Regulation 14A of the Exchange Act had the nominee been nominated by the Board; and (5) the consent of each nominee to serve as a director. The nominee’s written consent to the nomination and sufficient background information regarding the candidate must be included to enable the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee to make proper assessments as to his or her

qualifications. Nominations should be addressed to the Chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee at our headquarters and must be received no later than 30 days prior to our Annual Meeting of Shareholders, or within seven days after the date our notice of the Annual Meeting of Shareholders is given to our shareholders if our notice of that meeting is given less than 40 days prior to the date of that meeting.

Our Board has adopted a Policy Governing Director Qualifications and Nominations (the “Policy”). The substance of the Policy is incorporated into the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s Charter, which is available on our website at www.ufpi.com under the tabs “Investor Relations → Governance.” The Policy sets forth the general process the Committee is required to follow to identify and evaluate director nominees, including nominees recommended by shareholders. Under the Policy, the Committee has the authority to seek director candidates from any source deemed appropriate, including recommendations of candidates submitted by shareholders. The Policy requires the Committee to evaluate all proposed director candidates in the same manner, irrespective of the source of the initial recommendation of the proposed candidate.

The Policy includes minimum qualification standards, Board composition standards and additional qualification criteria. With respect to the former, the Policy requires that the Committee be satisfied that each recommended nominee meets the following qualifications:

In addition to these minimum qualification criteria, the Committee is required to recommend Board candidates to help ensure that a majority of our Board is independent, that each of the Audit, Personnel and Compensation, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees is comprised entirely of independent directors, and that at least one member of the Audit Committee qualifies as an audit committee financial expert. The Committee and our Board also consider diversity in their identification of director candidates. Diversity in business and professional experience, education, and background benefits the Company by increasing the range of skills and perspectives available to our Board. Director nominees are selected without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, or national origin. Our Board believes that adherence to these principles will provide an environment and practices that will yield the best return for our shareholders.

To date, the Committee has not paid any third-party fees to assist in identifying and evaluating nominees. As of the date of this proxy statement, the Committee has not received any recommended nominations from any of our shareholders in connection with our 2026 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

Our Bylaws provide for majority voting in connection with the election of directors. This majority voting standard is described above in the “Election of Directors” section.

Generally, shareholders who have questions or concerns regarding the Company should contact our Investor Relations Department at 800-598-9663. However, any shareholder who wishes to address questions regarding the business or affairs of the Company directly with the Board or any individual director should direct his or her questions in writing to our Secretary at 2801 East Beltline NE, Grand Rapids, MI 49525. Our Secretary has been directed to promptly forward all communications to the full Board or the specific director indicated in the letter. Our Board and management team are committed to actively engaging with our shareholders. During 2025, members of our executive team attended several investor conferences at which they met with existing shareholders as well as prospective shareholders. In addition, we regularly meet with investors, prospective investors, and investment analysts in person or via video conferencing. These meetings foster constructive dialogue and provide our executives with a better and deeper understanding of our shareholders’ priorities. In all instances, our discussions were limited to covering publicly available information.

Each director is expected to make a reasonable effort to attend all meetings of our Board, applicable committee meetings, and the Annual Meeting of Shareholders. During fiscal 2025, the Board of Directors held four meetings. All of our incumbent directors who were directors during 2025 attended at least 80% of the aggregate of the total number of Board meetings and the total number of meetings of committees of the Board on which he or she served. In addition, all directors in office at the time of our 2025 Annual Meeting of Shareholders attended that meeting.

Our Board has adopted an anti-hedging and anti-pledging policy, which restricts our executive officers and directors from engaging in hedging or pledging transactions involving our stock without prior approval. Our policy defines a hedging transaction as any transaction or series of related transactions that are designed to hedge or offset any decrease in the market value of our stock or otherwise eliminate risk related to the ownership of our stock. Pledging transactions are defined to mean any pledge or grant of a security interest in the Company’s securities as collateral for a loan or other obligations to a third party. Our executive officers and directors are prohibited from engaging in any such transactions without prior approval from the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. As of the date of this proxy statement, no such approvals have been made.

The Company has adopted an insider trading policy, which governs the purchase, sale, and/or other disposition of its securities by its directors, officers, employees, and other covered persons. The Company believes this policy is reasonably designed to promote compliance with insider trading laws, rules, and regulations, and the exchange listing standards applicable to the Company. A copy of this policy is filed as an exhibit to our Annual Report on Form 10-K.

We believe the roles of chief executive officer and chairman of the board should normally be separated. Matthew J. Missad serves as our Executive Chairman, and William D. Schwartz, Jr. serves as our Chief Executive Officer. However, Mr. Missad is not considered independent under the Nasdaq Standard due to his prior service as our Chief Executive Officer from 2011 until December 29, 2024. Our Board appointed Thomas W. Rhodes as Lead Independent Director to chair sessions of Board meetings that are exclusively attended by independent directors. In that capacity, Mr. Rhodes communicates actions requested by the independent directors and serves as a liaison between the independent directors and our Chief Executive Officer and Executive Chairman of the Board. We believe this structure provides the most effective governance of the Board while the director serving as Executive Chairman is not independent.

Our Board of Directors, through its three committees, has an advisory role in risk oversight for the Company. Company management maintains primary responsibility for the risk management of the Company. The current trends toward increased regulation, litigation, and political volatility make it extremely difficult to predict the type and magnitude of risks facing the Company. Despite this unpredictability, our Board relies on the representations of management, periodic reports from our independent

auditors, internal audit services performed by a third party, the Company’s systems of internal controls, the Company’s insurance advisors, and the historically conservative practices of the Company to provide comfort as to the Company’s ability to manage its risks. Management’s discussion of current material risk factors is set forth in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K.

In addition to the regular and ongoing review and evaluation of succession planning for the members of the Company’s Board of Directors by the Board’s Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, the Board and management regularly review and monitor succession planning for our current leadership positions, including succession in the event of an emergency. As part of that planning process, effective December 29, 2024, the first day of our fiscal year 2025, the Board appointed William D. Schwartz, Jr., who then served as President of UFP Retail Solutions, LLC, as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company. Also effective December 29, 2024, the Board appointed Matthew J. Missad, who then served as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and as Chairman of the Board, as Executive Chairman of the Board. In his role as Executive Chairman, in addition to serving as Chairman of the Board, Mr. Missad provides services to support the transition of the President and CEO roles to Mr. Schwartz, including in the areas of strategic planning and future value creation.

In addition to succession planning for the President and CEO positions, the Board regularly reviews and evaluates succession planning for each segment leader as well as the Company’s other functional executive leadership positions.

Our environmental, social and governance (ESG) initiatives are driven by our business philosophy: Take care of your customers, your employees, and your communities, and good financial results will follow. Our goals are to be recognized by our customers as the preferred supplier; by our employees as a safe and inclusive workforce; and by the communities in which we operate as a good corporate citizen. Our latest Governance Report, in which we detail our progress and our expectations going forward, is available on our website at www.ufpi.com under the tabs “Investor Relations → Governance.”

Our manufacturing operations have a long history of environmental stewardship through efficiency, energy savings, waste management, and responsible product sourcing. We quantify our Scope 1 and Scope 2 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and are committed to taking the following steps:

Continuous improvement is a key focus in our operations planning, and, through it, we aim to reduce energy usage as a percentage of unit sales. Our energy management team, which is responsible for continuously seeking opportunities to make our operations more efficient and sustainable, has made meaningful strides by upgrading electrical equipment, including motors, lighting, and panels.

We prevent waste through our unique sourcing model, which promotes the use of as much of a canted log as possible in our products. Parts are utilized by one or more of our three business segments, depending on the appearance, the engineering characteristics, and the utility for particular applications. What can’t be used in our products is converted to material that is recycled or upcycled by other industries. For example, our wood dust is recycled in quantities exceeding 25,000 tons per year.

Our primary raw material, wood, is renewable, sustainable, recyclable, durable, and biodegradable.

Using Life Cycle Assessment and a Total Embodied Energy perspective, wood is a clear winner over competing building materials. Lumber stores its carbon away in structures for decades. According to U.S. Department of Agriculture data published in

December 2021, in the U.S. alone, forests, wood products, and urban trees collectively offset annual carbon dioxide emissions by approximately 10-15%. Because of its superior strength-to-weight ratio, wood requires much less energy to manufacture and deliver to job sites compared to other building materials like steel, concrete, or plastic.

As wood is our primary source of raw material, the Company has a vested interest in the health and growth of the planet’s forests. According to The State of America’s Forests report, less than two percent of the standing tree inventory in the U.S. is harvested each year. In Canada, where much of our lumber is sourced, less than one percent of the managed forest is harvested annually. In both countries, responsible forest management has resulted in more than 50 consecutive years of forest growth that exceeds annual harvest. As a result of these trends, forests in both countries have sequestered high levels of carbon in recent decades.

We source lumber from around the world and review vendors’ operations through regular dialogue and on-site visits. Our mill vendors have a practice of planting more trees each year than they harvest, which is important to us and drives our sourcing decisions. Our expectations of suppliers, with whom we have many long-standing relationships, extend to their practices in waste management, health and safety, labor rights, conflict minerals, and human rights. We operate with the highest standard of integrity and sustainability and expect our suppliers to do the same. We have certified chain-of-custody credentials for both Sustainable Forestry Initiative (SFI) and Forest Stewardship Council (FSC); these groups have developed rigorous standards to ensure responsible harvesting of forests.

In our composite decking operations: 100% of the wood fiber used is reclaimed post-industrial waste; 50% of the plastic comes from post-consumer and post-industrial recycled sources; 100% of the composite decking is recyclable; 100% of the manufacturing waste is reused, recycled, or repurposed; and 95% of the extrusion scrap is recycled into our processes.

To build a supportive social fabric, we cultivate a unique culture that provides all employees significant opportunities for professional and personal growth, enabling them to be successful and to improve the communities in which they work and live. In managing our human capital, we focus on talent retention and recruitment, employee engagement, employee health and safety, community engagement, and employee learning and development.

A core value of the Company is equal opportunity for all. We continually broaden our recruiting efforts to connect with diverse groups who may be unaware of the Company or the opportunities we offer. To that end, we engage with local organizations who help low-income candidates connect with employment opportunities. Our recruitment team ensures that external job postings are available to all, and we specifically drive them to low-income areas and unemployment agencies. We continue to pursue our strategy of increasing the diversity of our workforce while being a destination workplace for people who seek challenge, opportunity, and success.

Levels of education and training vary greatly among our job candidates and employees. Many do not have a post-secondary education. We have instituted measures to support these individuals and to create opportunities for those from diverse or low-income backgrounds. This includes eliminating the requirement that sales and management aspirants have a four-year college degree. We also value promoting from within. Work experience with the Company counts, mitigating the impact that lack of a formal education can have on opportunities for advancement.

We use several methods to measure and advance employee engagement and effectiveness of our strategies to create a better, safer, and inclusive workplace and build stronger customer relationships. Among them are annual plant reviews, internal audits to assess the strengths and weaknesses of each plant’s HR policies and practices, and anonymous employee surveys. We use these tools to ensure our operations adhere to policies and standards designed to create a safe, sustainable, and healthy workplace.

Our health and safety program includes industry-leading training and regular compliance audits and oversight designed to ensure that our employees maintain their health and are protected from injury in the workplace. Every employee is responsible for following Company health and safety guidelines to reduce the risk of injury to themselves and their co-workers. We maintain a robust safety organization overseen by our Executive Vice President of Human Capital, who reports to our Chief Executive Officer, and which

includes a Corporate Safety Committee led by our Vice President of Safety. In addition, we have Regional Safety Directors, and each of our plants has dedicated safety personnel overseeing compliance with corporate safety policies as well as employee training. This training is offered in several formats to accommodate diverse needs. As a result of our efforts, our accident frequency rates are low when compared with others in our industry.

We drive community engagement in several ways. The UFP Industries Foundation targets its giving at root causes to help our communities grow stronger. We partner with local nonprofits that help people build self-confidence, dignity, and resilience by teaching them to overcome obstacles. We champion causes like skilled trades training, community-based problem solving, environmental care, disaster recovery, and improving the lives of U.S. veterans. Helping others reach their potential lies at the heart of our Company and the UFP Industries Foundation. We proudly support our employees in their many efforts to give back, such as by identifying and organizing local opportunities to volunteer.  

We offer our employees a variety of opportunities for professional development and learning. Among them are courses offered through the UFP Business School, our internal training and upskilling entity that offers hundreds of courses and programs for new and experienced employees to hone their skills and prepare for advancement. Most of our courses offer remote accessibility to provide flexibility. As we continue to grow, our goal is to expand the pool of job candidates, provide excellent training and education, and encourage equal growth opportunities within the Company. By expanding our outreach and providing additional education, we aim to add more diverse team members who have the desire and ability to be promoted to leadership positions.

We value corporate governance as a key component of responsible business practices. We maintain robust governance practices at both the Board and executive leadership levels and across our business units. Our efforts are led by our leadership team and reviewed by our Executive Committee, which includes our CEO, CFO, and presidents of our three operating segments, with oversight by our Board and its committees.

We believe we have sound and effective corporate governance practices. Certain key aspects of our corporate governance policies and practices as they relate to our Board of Directors and executive management team are described in the foregoing sections of this proxy statement.

We are dedicated to monitoring and advancing our data privacy and cybersecurity efforts. We have a privacy committee that includes senior leadership from our HR, IT, Legal, and Governance and Compliance departments. The committee meets periodically throughout the year to discuss employee training, cybersecurity risks, policy development, and ongoing infrastructure enhancement projects. We provide our employees with education and training to identify and avoid phishing and other social engineering scams that may compromise the privacy and integrity of our data.

We maintain a cybersecurity risk management program designed to evaluate material threats and vulnerabilities and their potential impact on our operations, data, and stakeholders. We regularly review and update the program to address emerging risks. We have aligned our program with internationally recognized frameworks, including the NIST CSF and ISO 27001, as well as risk management guidelines such as NIST-SP 800-37 (RMF) and ISO 27005. We engage external assessors, consultants, independent auditors, and, as needed, outside counsel to evaluate aspects of our cybersecurity program, controls, and overall posture. We conduct tabletop exercises for our incident response and disaster recovery activities and perform internal and external vulnerability assessments as well as penetration testing. We monitor third-party service providers and suppliers through risk-based onboarding and periodic assessments. We also maintain security-focused contractual requirements and conduct risk-based continuous monitoring of vendors. Mandatory, periodic security and privacy training is provided to all employees during their onboarding and employment with our organization. We supplement this training with phishing simulations and awareness activities on an ongoing basis.

The Audit Committee selected Deloitte & Touche LLP (“Deloitte”) as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 26, 2026 (“Fiscal 2026”). Deloitte has served as our independent registered public accounting firm since 2014. The services provided to us by Deloitte for fiscal years 2025 and 2024 are described below under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm – Disclosure of Fees.”

We are asking our shareholders to ratify the selection of Deloitte as our independent registered public accounting firm for Fiscal 2026. Although ratification is not legally required, the Board is submitting the selection of Deloitte to our shareholders for ratification as a matter of good corporate governance. Representatives of Deloitte are expected to be present at our Annual Meeting to respond to appropriate questions and to make such statements as they may desire.

The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares voted on this matter will be required for ratification. The persons named as proxies in the accompanying proxy will vote in favor of ratification, unless a shareholder directs them differently by proxy. This matter is considered routine under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange. Consequently, if you hold your shares in street name, then unless otherwise instructed by you, brokerage firms, banks, and other nominees will have the discretionary authority to vote your shares on this matter. Abstentions will not be treated as votes cast on this matter and will have no effect on the outcome.

If our shareholders do not ratify the appointment, the appointment will be reconsidered by the Audit Committee and the Board. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee, at its discretion, may select a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in the best interest of the Company and its shareholders.

As explained above, Deloitte served as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal years ended December 27, 2025 and December 28, 2024. The following table sets forth the fees billed by Deloitte for those years, all of which were pre-approved by the Audit Committee pursuant to the pre-approval policy described below. No more than 50% of the hours expended on Deloitte’s engagement to audit our financial statements for fiscal 2025 were attributable to work performed by persons other than Deloitte’s full-time, permanent employees.

The Audit Committee has established a pre-approval policy and procedures for all services to be performed by our independent registered public accounting firm. The policy requires all services to be provided by our auditor to be pre-approved by the Audit Committee or, subject to certain conditions, a designated member of the Audit Committee. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the policy provides that this pre-approval requirement will not apply to the provision of certain de minimis non-audit services to be provided by our auditor, provided that certain conditions required by the SEC are met. All of the services provided by Deloitte and disclosed in the table above were pre-approved by the Audit Committee without relying on this de minimis exception. The policy also prohibits us from retaining Deloitte for services that are proscribed by rules of the SEC to be performed by the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm.

On February 25, 2026, the Audit Committee submitted to the Board of Directors the following report:

The Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the Company’s audited financial statements as of and for the year ended December 27, 2025.

The Committee has discussed with our independent auditors the matters required to be discussed by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) and the SEC.

The Committee has received from Deloitte the written disclosures and letter required by the applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding Deloitte’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence and has discussed with Deloitte its independence.

Based on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements referred to above be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 27, 2025.

Brian C. Walker, Chairman

Benjamin J. McLean

Mary Tuuk Kuras

Consistent with our Board’s recommendation, as approved by our shareholders, and as required under the Exchange Act, we allow our shareholders the opportunity to vote, on an advisory and annual basis, on the compensation paid to our Named Executives. To approve such compensation, a majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting must vote in favor of the compensation paid. Because your vote is advisory, it will not be binding on our Board or the Personnel and Compensation Committee. However, our Board and Personnel and Compensation Committee will review the voting results and take them into consideration when making future decisions regarding executive compensation.

The Company has had a long-standing tradition of delivering results to its shareholders. Because the compensation of our executives has been closely linked to Company performance, our executive compensation programs have played a major role in our ability to drive strong financial results and attract and retain a highly experienced, successful team to manage the Company.

Our compensation programs are substantially tied to our key business objectives and financial performance. If the value we deliver to our shareholders declines, so does the compensation we pay to our executives. We closely monitor the compensation programs and pay levels of executives of companies of similar size and complexity, with the objective that our compensation programs are within a range of market practices and remain competitive.

We believe our executive compensation programs are effective and structured in a manner that (a) is consistent with our compensation philosophy and objectives (as described in our Compensation Discussion and Analysis below), (b) promotes our business objectives, and (c) supports our culture and traditions that have existed for 70 years.

The advisory vote on executive compensation was conducted at our Annual Meeting of Shareholders in 2025, based on the disclosure of our executive compensation in the proxy statement for that meeting. Over 96% of the votes cast in that advisory vote voted in favor of approving the compensation paid to our Named Executives. The Board considered the results of this vote as highly supportive of the Company’s compensation policies and programs.

For the reasons set forth above, our Board of Directors recommends that you vote in favor of the following resolution:

“RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to the Company’s named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables, narrative disclosure, and related material disclosed in the Company’s proxy statement for its 2026 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, is hereby APPROVED.”

The persons named as proxies in the accompanying proxy will vote in favor of the resolution, unless a shareholder directs them differently by proxy. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not be treated as votes cast on this matter and will have no effect on the outcome. This matter is considered non-routine under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange. Consequently, if you hold your shares in street name, then unless otherwise instructed by you, brokerage firms, banks, and other nominees cannot vote your shares on this matter.

The following table contains information with respect to ownership of our common stock by each director, each nominee for election as a director, each Named Executive in the tables under the caption “Executive Compensation” below, and all executive officers, directors, and director nominees as a group. The information in this table was furnished by our officers, directors, and nominees for election of directors, and represents our understanding of circumstances in existence as of February 27, 2026:

We believe our employees are our most important asset. Our executive compensation program has been designed to motivate, reward, attract and retain management personnel that we deem essential to promote our success. The program seeks to align executive compensation with Company objectives, business strategy and financial performance. In applying these principles, we seek to:

We believe the compensation of our executives should reflect the performance of the business units in which they are involved and for which they are responsible. We further believe the performance of our executives in managing the Company, considered in light of general economic and specific Company, industry and competitive conditions, should be the basis for determining their overall compensation.

Our compensation program is designed to reward overall financial performance as well as each person’s individual contribution to the Company. In measuring an individual’s contribution to the Company, the Personnel and Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) considers numerous factors, including the individual’s contribution to Company performance, individual performance relative to pre-established goals, and general economic conditions in the markets we serve.

The Committee has responsibility for establishing, implementing and monitoring adherence to our compensation philosophy and established programs. The Committee seeks to ensure that the total compensation paid to our executives is fair, reasonable and competitive.

The principal components of our executive compensation consist of (a) base salary, (b) annual performance incentives, and (c) long-term incentive compensation (generally payable in the form of equity-based compensation awards).

It has been our practice to provide modest base salaries, relative to the market, and place a greater emphasis on performance-based compensation. We believe that this is consistent with motivating our management team to create shareholder value and with what our shareholders expect. If we perform well and create value for our shareholders, our management team is compensated well for those results. We measure financial performance by our return on investment (“ROI”) in the business (described below), a metric we believe correlates well with the creation of shareholder value.

For 2025, the Company achieved an overall ROI of 14.15% (our threshold ROI is 6.0% for the corporate incentive compensation pool and 8.5% for each segment pool). This resulted in meaningful incentive compensation awards. Our annual cash incentive compensation is limited to two times each executive’s prevailing base salary. Any amount earned in excess of this limitation is paid in the form of long-term equity-based compensation.

As explained in more detail below, any incentive compensation paid in the form of our shares is subject to future service conditions. Consequently, each executive must continue working for the Company for an additional service period to receive the balance of the incentive compensation earned in 2025 and paid as Long-Term Compensation (defined below). For 2025, the variable compensation earned by all of the Company’s Profit Centers (defined below) totaled approximately $81 million in annual cash incentive compensation and $12 million in long-term incentive compensation. The long-term incentive amount was paid in the form of (a) restricted stock grants that vest five years from the grant date and (b) stock performance units that vest and are payable three years from the date of grant, based upon Company performance.

Base Salaries. Base salaries are set for our executive officers at the Committee’s first meeting each year, generally at the end of January or the beginning of February. At this meeting, our Chief Executive Officer makes compensation recommendations to the Committee with respect to our executive officers, excluding his own compensation. The Committee may accept or adjust such recommendations. It makes the sole determination of the compensation for our Chief Executive Officer, subject to the approval of our Board.

The Committee considers a variety of objective and subjective factors in considering the establishment of base salaries. In addition, the Committee reviews and monitors the executive compensation programs and pay levels of executives among the Company’s peer group¹. Based upon its review, the Committee concluded that our compensation program for executive officers is generally competitive and is effective in providing the requisite incentives and rewards to our leadership team.

For Fiscal 2026, the Committee approved the below salaries for our respective Named Executives:

As noted above, at our Annual Meeting of Shareholders in 2025, based on the disclosure of our executive compensation in the proxy statement for that meeting, over 96% of the votes cast on the proposal voted in favor of a resolution to approve the compensation paid to our Named Executives.

Chief Executive Officer. The Committee annually reviews, and recommends for Board approval, our Chief Executive Officer’s base salary. Factors considered by the Committee include comparable compensation data, assessment of past performance, and anticipated future contributions in leading the Company. Mr. Schwartz’s base salary for 2025 was below the mid-range of the salaries of comparable executives in our peer group¹. The Committee has complete discretion in recommending the base salary for Mr. Schwartz, who does not have an employment agreement with the Company.

CEO Pay Ratio. For fiscal 2025, the ratio of the median of the annual total compensation of all of our active employees as of December 27, 2025, excluding our Chief Executive Officer ($52,451), to the annual total compensation of our Chief Executive Officer ($3,681,727) was 70:1. The compensation of our median employee was determined by: (1) calculating the annual total compensation of all of our active employees as of December 27, 2025 (the “Determination Date”); (2) ranking the annual total compensation of all employees (except our Chief Executive Officer) from lowest to highest (which comprised a total of 14,529 employees); and (3) selecting the employee who ranked as the median (7,265 on the list of 14,529). We included all of our full-time and part-time employees as of the Determination Date and annualized the total compensation for those full-time and part-time employees who were employed by us for less than one year as of the Determination Date. We applied applicable foreign exchange rates, relative to the U.S. dollar, for our non-U.S. employees. Total annual compensation for each employee, other than

the CEO, is based on our payroll records and includes each element of compensation listed in the Summary Compensation Table below, with the exception of (a) employer contributions to any 401(k) or similar qualified, defined contribution plan, and (b) shares granted not vested, both of which are excluded from the total annual compensation for each employee other than our CEO. For ease of administration, bonus dollars for all employees, except the CEO, reflect actual bonus compensation paid in 2025 but earned in 2024. However, as required for the Summary Compensation Table, the bonus dollars for the CEO reflect bonus dollars and associated stock grants earned in 2025 and paid in February 2026.

Annual Incentive Compensation. Our incentive compensation program provides for the contribution of a fixed percentage of pre-incentive compensation operating profit to each of a number of pools, based upon the pre-incentive compensation ROI of each plant, business unit and segment (each of which is referred to as a “Profit Center”), as well as a separate Corporate incentive compensation pool. Combined, these incentive compensation pools are the source of the Company’s aggregate incentive compensation awards.

ROI is determined based upon the Profit Center’s pre-incentive compensation operating profit, less income taxes, divided by the average investment of the Profit Center. Average investment is defined as the average of inventory, plus accounts receivable, plus net property, plant and equipment, plus intangibles, less accumulated amortization and less accounts payable.

At the beginning of each year, each Named Executive is allocated a fixed percentage of the incentive compensation pool of his or her respective Profit Center. The amount of an employee’s percentage of his or her pool is generally reflective of that person’s relative degree of responsibility for the operations and results of that Profit Center, as well as his or her performance and tenure with the Company. If the Profit Center generates profits which result in an incentive compensation pool, the participant receives the allocated percentage as incentive compensation. The dollar amount of that pool is based upon the Profit Center aggregate ROI. As ROI increases, a higher percentage of pre-incentive compensation operating profit is contributed to the pool.

For the Corporate Profit Center, the minimum contribution percentage of 4.7% of pre-incentive compensation operating profit occurs at the lowest level of ROI, which is 6.0%. The maximum contribution percentage of 7.5% occurs at a ROI of at least 22.0%. Following the achievement of ROI of 6.0%, and subject to the maximum contribution rate of 7.5%, for every 100 basis point improvement in ROI, the Company contributes an approximate additional 2.5 basis points of pre-incentive compensation operating profit to the Corporate Profit Center incentive compensation pool. Three of our Named Executives participated in the Corporate Profit Center incentive compensation pool in 2025. For our segment pools, the minimum contribution percentage of 1.8% of pre-incentive compensation operating profit occurs at the lowest level of ROI, which is 8.5%. The maximum contribution percentage of 2.2% occurs at an ROI of at least 22.0%. Subject to the maximum contribution percentage of 2.2%, for every 100 basis point improvement in ROI, the Company contributes approximately 0.35 basis points in pre-incentive compensation operating profit to each segment incentive compensation pool.

There are tiered performance thresholds for both the size of each incentive compensation pool as well as individual incentive compensation payments. Under this program, each performance pool was preliminarily allocated funds based upon the formula described in the preceding paragraph. Each pool is then subject to threshold amounts. For the Corporate Profit Center incentive compensation pool, the thresholds were $850 million (Tier 1) and $950 million (Tier 2). To the extent the pool exceeds Tier 1, 25% of the pool in excess of Tier 1 and below Tier 2 is deducted from the pool and effectively reallocated to shareholders; 50% of the pool in excess of Tier 2 is effectively reallocated to shareholders. The segment pools are subject to the same reallocations at $300 million (Tier 1) and $350 million (Tier 2).

In addition to the adjustments made to the incentive compensation pools, and subsequent to those adjustments, preliminary individual incentive compensation allocations for the leaders of each pool, as well as each other Named Executive, are subject to similar adjustments. For 2025, each Named Executive other than the CEO was subject to payment thresholds of $1 million (Tier 1) and $1.5 million (Tier 2). For preliminary bonus payments in excess of Tier 1, 25% of the amount between Tier 1 and Tier 2 was reallocated to other, non-Named Executive participants; 50% of the preliminary bonus payment above Tier 2 was similarly reallocated.

For 2025, we achieved an overall ROI of 14.15%. Following the adjustments described above, the total contribution to the Corporate Profit Center incentive compensation pool for fiscal 2025 was $29,992,439, which equaled 6.1 % of pre-incentive compensation operating profit. The performance bonuses for Messrs. Schwartz, Missad, and Cole were based upon the Company’s total ROI, and the performance bonuses for Messrs. Benton and Tarvin were based upon the ROI of their respective segments.

For 2025, Mr. Schwartz was eligible to receive an initial 10% allocation of the net Corporate Profit Center pool and was not subject to tiering. The initial allocation to each of the other Named Executives was subject to the adjustments described above. Following the application of those adjustments, not more than 2.0 times an executive’s base salary may be paid in the form of annual cash incentive compensation. As a result, Mr. Schwartz received cash incentive compensation of $1,400,000 for 2025, which was 4.67% of the Corporate Profit Center incentive compensation pool. Mr. Schwartz’s total allocation of the 2025 Corporate Profit Center incentive compensation pool was 10.0%.

The amount of incentive compensation earned by an employee in excess of the annual cash incentive compensation limitation is paid in the form of equity-based compensation awards under our Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan (“Long-Term Compensation”). Ninety percent (90%) of the equity awards granted to the Named Executives in 2026, based upon 2025 performance, were paid in the form of shares of restricted Company common stock that cliff vest on the fifth anniversary of the award date. The balance of the awards was issued in the form of performance units. The number of shares that may be issued for each performance unit is determined at the end of the three-year performance period, based upon the Company’s actual, cumulative pre-incentive compensation operating profit relative to the budgeted amount of cumulative, pre-incentive compensation operating profit for that three-year period (“Budget PBOP”). The Budget PBOP is determined as of the beginning of each three-year performance period. The actual number of shares issuable is based upon the product of (1) the number of target shares that are subject to the award, and (2) the earnout percentage, based upon the following:

In addition, no shares are issuable under our performance unit award agreements unless the Company achieves the targeted pre-incentive compensation return on investment (“PBROI”) during the three-year performance period. For awards granted in 2025, the target level PBROI was 12.0%.

The three-year performance period for performance units granted in 2023 ended on December 27, 2025. The PBROI for that period exceeded the target of 12.0%. The Company’s actual PBOP for that three-year performance period was 64.93% of budget, resulting in Messrs. Missad, Cole, and Benton (the Named Executives awarded performance units in 2023) receiving 5,734; 2,188; and 1,860 shares of common stock, respectively.

The following table discloses and explains the determination of incentive compensation earned by the Named Executives for 2025.

Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan. We provide long-term incentive compensation to our executive officers and key employees through grants of restricted shares, conditional stock grants, and other equity-based awards under the terms of our Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan (the “LTSIP”). The Committee has complete discretion in determining eligibility for participation and the type and number of shares subject to awards made under the LTSIP, except for those awarded to our CEO, which are determined by the Board.

Based upon the formula described above, our Named Executives received restricted stock awards and performance units in the following amounts for 2025 performance under our long-term incentive compensation program:

Minimum Stock Ownership Requirements. We encourage and promote ownership of Company stock by our employees and directors. We have a Minimum Stock Ownership Policy that sets requirements for ownership of our common stock by our officers and other key employees. The minimum requirement for each officer is $200,000 worth of common stock. Our Corporate Governance Principles require each director to own a minimum of 7,500 shares of common stock within two years after initial election to the Board.

Deferred Compensation Plan. We maintain a Deferred Compensation Plan (“DCP”) which allows key employees to defer a portion of their salary and/or cash incentive compensation. Our Named Executives may not defer more than $15,000 of salary or more than $100,000 of incentive compensation per year. Participants in the DCP may elect to invest the deferred amounts in certain investment alternatives, including our common stock. Also, under the DCP, if a key employee’s ownership of our common stock is below certain targeted thresholds, the amount of the deferral must be used to invest in shares of our common stock. All amounts deferred to the DCP that are invested in our common stock are invested at a price per share representing a 15% discount to the prevailing market price of our stock. In general, each employee receives a payout of his or her DCP account one year from the date he or she terminates employment with the Company, unless termination of employment is due to retirement, death or change in control, in which case the employee or his or her beneficiary may receive the distribution earlier, subject to DCP provisions. An employee’s participation in the DCP will terminate if the employee fails to make a deferral election under the DCP for two consecutive years, beginning on or after the plan year commencing January 1, 2024.

Executive Stock Match Program. The Company maintains an Executive Stock Match Program (the “ESMP”) pursuant to which we grant restricted shares of our common stock to eligible employees who invest in shares of the Company’s common stock under the DCP. Under the ESMP, approximately $0.35 worth of Company stock is awarded for each $1.00 deferred and invested in Company stock under the DCP (the “Match Shares”). The Match Shares vest in full on the fifth anniversary of the grant date, subject to certain acceleration events.

Employee Stock Purchase Plan. We have a shareholder-approved Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “ESPP”) which allows our employees to make payroll deductions or lump sum contributions, or both, for the purchase of our common stock. Shares of our common stock are purchased with the money in the employee’s account on the last trading day of the quarter, at a 15% discount from the then prevailing market price of our common stock. All eligible employees with at least one year of service may participate in the ESPP. Under the ESPP, an employee may not acquire more than $25,000 of our common stock in any one plan year, based upon the fair market value of our stock as of the date of purchase.

Executive Retirement Plan. Under our Executive Retirement Plan (the “ERP”), selected officers with 20 or more years of Company service and at least 10 years of service as an officer are entitled to certain retirement benefits. The ERP provides for a retirement benefit at age 62 or later of 150% of base salary (based upon the executive’s highest annual base salary during the 3-year period preceding retirement), and is payable over three years after retirement, death, or disability. The retirement benefit is reduced if the participant’s death, disability, or retirement occurs prior to age 62 but after age 55, which is the minimum age necessary to receive any benefit pursuant to the ERP (other than following a change of control of the Company). None of the foregoing age or service requirements applies if an ERP participant dies, becomes disabled, or retires following a change of control of the Company, in which case the retirement benefit is 150% of base salary based upon the executive’s highest annual base salary during the 3-year period preceding death, disability, or retirement. In each case, payment of the retirement benefit is contingent on the executive signing a release of claims and non-compete in favor of the Company. Our Chief Executive Officer and Executive Chairman currently do not participate in the ERP.

Clawback Policy. Our Board has adopted a Clawback Policy that requires the Company to recoup or otherwise recover certain incentive compensation paid to the Company’s executive officers in the event of a restatement of the Company’s financial statements, as described in the policy. The policy authorizes recovery of all equity-based compensation, including time-vesting awards, in situations where an executive officer’s improper conduct has resulted in, or could reasonably be expected to result in, a significant adverse effect on the Company. The Clawback Policy also permits our Board, in its discretion, to recoup certain incentive compensation paid to an executive officer who has engaged in certain improper misconduct, as described in the policy.

Say on Pay Results and Shareholder Engagement. Historically, our shareholders have expressed meaningful support of the Company’s executive compensation practices and programs. As noted above, we have favored a practice of providing modest base salaries, relative to our peers and the market, in return for a greater emphasis on performance-based compensation. Our financial performance over the past several years indicates that this practice has yielded significant benefits for our shareholders (from 2023 through 2025, the Company’s share price has increased 17% and its compound annual growth rate over that three-year period has been 5%). As noted above, at our Annual Meeting of Shareholders in 2025, based on the disclosure of our executive compensation in the proxy statement for that meeting, over 96% of the votes cast in the advisory shareholder say-on-pay vote voted in favor of approving the compensation paid to our Named Executives.

The primary purpose of the Personnel and Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) is to assist the Board in discharging its responsibilities related to the compensation of the Company’s executives. The Committee’s responsibilities are more fully described in its Charter, which is available on our website at www.ufpi.com under the tabs “Investor Relations → Governance.”

The Committee reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis included in this proxy statement. Effective as of March 4, 2026, based upon that review and those discussions, the Committee recommended to our Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement.

Thomas W. Rhodes, Chairman

Joan A. Budden

Brian C. Walker

Michael G. Wooldridge

The following table includes information regarding the compensation for our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and our three other most highly compensated executive officers for each of our last three fiscal years (the “Named Executives”).

We provide benefit programs to executive officers and other employees. The following table generally identifies such benefit programs and those employees who may be eligible to participate:

We believe perquisites for executive officers should be limited in scope and value. As a result, we have historically provided nominal perquisites. The following table generally illustrates the perquisites we do and do not provide and identifies those employees who may be eligible to receive them.

The following table reflects the grant of plan-based awards made in fiscal 2025 to the Named Executives:

The following table sets forth information concerning equity awards held by the Named Executives as of December 27, 2025: