UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
___________________________
SCHEDULE 14A
PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(a) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
___________________________
Filed by the Registrant ☒ Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☐
Check the appropriate box:
☐ Preliminary Proxy Statement
☐ Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a‑6(e)(2))
☒ Definitive Proxy Statement
☐ Definitive Additional Materials
☐ Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a‑11(c) or §240.14a‑2
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check all boxes that apply):
☒ No fee required.
☐ Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
☐ Fee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
120 Holger Way, San Jose, CA 95134
Dear Stockholder:
I am pleased to invite you to attend the 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, or the Annual Meeting, of Zscaler, Inc., or Zscaler or the Company, to be held on Monday, January 12, 2026 at 1:00 p.m. Pacific Time. The Annual Meeting will be conducted virtually via live webcast. You will be able to vote and submit your questions during the meeting by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/ZS2026 (please have your notice or proxy card in hand when you visit the website).
The attached Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy Statement contain details of the business to be conducted at the Annual Meeting.
Whether or not you attend the virtual Annual Meeting, it is important that your shares be represented and voted at the meeting. Therefore, I urge you to promptly vote and submit your proxy via the internet, by phone or by mail.
On behalf of the Board of Directors, I would like to express our appreciation for your support of, and interest in, Zscaler.
Sincerely,
Jay Chaudhry
Chief Executive Officer and
Chairman of the Board
Chief Executive Officer and
Chairman of the Board
Notice of Annual Meeting
of Stockholders
of Stockholders
| Date and Time | Record Date and Who Can Vote | |||||||||||||
January 12, 2026 1:00 p.m. Pacific Time | November 14, 2025, or the Record Date. Only stockholders of record at the close of business on the Record Date are entitled to receive notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting. | |||||||||||||
| Virtual Meeting Site | ||||||||||||||
The Annual Meeting will be a completely virtual meeting of stockholders, to be conducted via live audio webcast. You will be able to attend the virtual Annual Meeting and submit your questions during the meeting by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/ZS2026. | ||||||||||||||
| Items of Business | |||||
| 1 | To elect three Class II directors from the nominees described in this Proxy Statement to hold office until the 2028 annual meeting of stockholders or until their successors are elected and qualified, subject to their earlier death, resignation or removal. | ||||
| 2 | To ratify the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, or PwC, as our independent registered public accounting firm for our fiscal year ending July 31, 2026. | ||||
| 3 | To approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, the compensation of our Named Executive Officers. | ||||
| 4 | To approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, the frequency of future stockholder advisory votes to approve the compensation of our Named Executive Officers. | ||||
| 5 | To consider and vote on, if properly presented at the Annual Meeting, a non-binding stockholder proposal requesting the declassification of our board of directors. | ||||
| 6 | To transact other business that may properly come before the Annual Meeting. | ||||
Your vote is important. Whether or not you plan to attend the virtual Annual Meeting, we urge you to submit your vote via the internet, telephone or mail as soon as possible to ensure your shares are represented. For additional instructions for each of these voting options, please refer to the proxy card. Returning the proxy does not deprive you of your right to attend the virtual Annual Meeting and to vote your shares at the virtual Annual Meeting. The Proxy Statement explains proxy voting and the matters to be voted on in more detail. Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Virtual Annual Meeting to be Held on January 12, 2026. Our proxy materials, including the Proxy Statement and Annual Report to Stockholders, are being made available on or about November 21, 2025 at the following website: www.proxyvote.com, as well as on our website at http://ir.zscaler.com in the Financials section of our Investor Relations webpage. We are providing access to our proxy materials over the internet under the rules adopted by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. By Order of the Board of Directors,  Robert Schlossman Chief Legal Officer and Secretary San Jose, CA November 21, 2025 | ||||||||||||||
Your vote is important. To vote your shares, please follow the instructions in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, which is being mailed to you on or about November 21, 2025. | ||||||||||||||
Table of Contents
Proxy Summary
This Proxy Statement and form of proxy are furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies by our board of directors for use at our 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and any postponements, adjournments or continuations thereof. The Annual Meeting will be held on January 12, 2026 at 1:00 p.m. Pacific Time, via live audio webcast at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/ZS2026. The Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, or the Notice, containing instructions on how to access this Proxy Statement and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2025, or the Annual Report, is first being mailed on or about November 21, 2025 to all stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. If you receive a Notice by mail, you will not receive a printed copy of the proxy materials in the mail unless you specifically request these materials.
Ways to Vote
| Via the Internet | By Telephone | By Mail | At the Annual Meeting | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |  |  |  | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Voting Matters and Recommendations
| Proposals | Voting Recommendation | Page | |||||||||
| 1 | To elect three Class II directors from the nominees described in this Proxy Statement to hold office until the 2028 annual meeting of stockholders or until their successors are elected and qualified, subject to their earlier death, resignation or removal. | "FOR" | |||||||||
| 2 | To ratify the selection of PwC as our independent registered public accounting firm for our fiscal year ending July 31, 2026. | "FOR" | |||||||||
| 3 | To approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, the compensation of our Named Executive Officers. | "FOR" | |||||||||
| 4 | To approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, the frequency of future stockholder advisory votes to approve the compensation of our Named Executive Officers. | "ONE YEAR" | |||||||||
| 5 | If properly presented at the Annual Meeting, to vote on a non-binding stockholder proposal requesting the declassification of our board of directors, or the Board Declassification Proposal. | "AGAINST" | |||||||||
 | 2025 Proxy Statement | 1 | ||||||
n PROXY SUMMARY
Executive Compensation Highlights
Our pay practices align with our pay-for-performance philosophy and underscore our commitment to sound compensation and governance practices. We believe that as organizations continue to embrace cloud-based business solutions, they are still in the early stages of adopting the security and networking solutions, including our platform, that are necessary to secure and manage cloud-based operations. To be successful in this emerging market, we believe that delivering growth, capturing market share and delivering annual operating profitability are paramount. Since we strongly believe that establishing and meeting aggressive growth targets in both the short term and the long term is the best way to deliver sustained stockholder value in a highly competitive and emerging market, we focus our performance metrics for our annual executive cash bonuses on achieving growth in each fiscal year but also include performance metrics focused on non-GAAP income from operations. For our long-term incentive equity compensation, we focus our performance metrics on multi-year annual recurring revenue, or ARR, growth targets.
Fiscal 2025 Financial Performance
Fiscal 2025 was a strong year for us marked by significant achievement and growth across all of our key metrics. Fiscal 2025 highlights were as follows:
| Revenue Growth | Calculated Billings Growth* | Non-GAAP Income from Operations† | Growth in Large Customers | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
23% Y/Y | 24% Y/Y | 31%Y/Y | 18% Y/Y | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| $2.67B Revenue | $3.25B Billings | $580.1M | +664 Enterprises (>$1M ARR) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |  |  |  | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
*Calculated billings is a non-GAAP financial measure that we believe is a key metric to measure our periodic performance. Calculated billings represents our total revenue plus the change in deferred revenue in a period. See Appendix A for the calculation of calculated billings.
†Non-GAAP income from operations is a financial measure that we believe is a key metric to measure our periodic performance. Non-GAAP income from operations represents GAAP loss from operations excluding stock-based compensation expense and related payroll taxes, amortization expense of acquired intangible assets, restructuring and other changes and acquisition-related expenses. See Appendix A for the calculation of non-GAAP income from operations.
2 | 2025 Proxy Statement | | ||||||
Board of Directors and Corporate Governance
Our business affairs are managed under the direction of our board of directors, which is currently comprised of nine members. Seven of our nine directors are independent within the meaning of the independent director requirements of the Nasdaq Stock Market LLC, or Nasdaq. Our board of directors is divided into three classes with staggered three-year terms. At each annual meeting of stockholders, a class of directors will be elected for a three-year term to succeed the same class whose term is then expiring.
Upon the recommendation of our nominating and corporate governance committee, we are nominating Andrew Brown, Scott Darling and David Schneider as Class II directors at the Annual Meeting. If elected, Mr. Brown, Mr. Darling and Mr. Schneider will each hold office for a three-year term until the 2028 annual meeting of stockholders or until their successors are elected and qualified.
The following table sets forth the names, ages as of November 1, 2025 and certain other information for each of the directors with terms expiring at the Annual Meeting (who are also nominees for election as a director at the Annual Meeting) and for each of the continuing directors:
| Director Nominees | Class | Age | Position | Director Since | Current Term Expires | Expiration of Term for Which Nominated | ||||||||||||||
Andrew Brown(1)(2) | II | 62 | Director | 2015 | 2025 | 2028 | ||||||||||||||
Scott Darling(1)(3) | II | 69 | Director | 2016 | 2025 | 2028 | ||||||||||||||
David Schneider(3) | II | 57 | Director | 2019 | 2025 | 2028 | ||||||||||||||
| Continuing Directors | Class | Age | Position | Director Since | Current Term Expires | Expiration of Term for Which Nominated | ||||||||||||||
James Beer(1) | III | 64 | Director | 2024 | 2026 | — | ||||||||||||||
| Jay Chaudhry | III | 67 | Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer | 2007 | 2026 | — | ||||||||||||||
| Raj Judge | III | 59 | Director and Executive Vice President of Corporate Strategy | 2025 | 2026 | — | ||||||||||||||
Karen Blasing(1) | I | 69 | Director | 2017 | 2027 | — | ||||||||||||||
Charles Giancarlo(2)(3) | I | 67 | Director | 2016 | 2027 | — | ||||||||||||||
Eileen Naughton(2) | I | 67 | Director | 2021 | 2027 | — | ||||||||||||||
(1)Member of our audit committee
(2)Member of our compensation committee
(3)Member of our nominating and corporate governance committee
| 2025 Proxy Statement | 3 | ||||||
n BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Board Composition
| Independence | Tenure | Age | Gender | ||||||||
4 | 2025 Proxy Statement | | ||||||
BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE n
Director Skills Matrix
The following table summarizes the key qualifications, skills and attributes of our director nominees and the continuing members of our board of directors. A mark indicates a specific area or focus of expertise on which our board of directors particularly relies. Not having a mark does not mean the director does not possess that qualification or skill. Our directors' biographies describe each director's background and relevant experience in greater detail.
| Director Skills | Chaudhry | Beer | Blasing | Brown | Darling | Giancarlo | Judge | Naughton | Schneider | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Senior Leadership | n | n | n | n | n | n | n | n | n | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Industry Expertise | n | n | n | n | n | n | n | n | n | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Financial Knowledge and Expertise | n | n | n | n | n | n | n | n | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Public Company Board Experience | n | n | n | n | n | n | n | n | n | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Cybersecurity/Information Security | n | n | n | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Global/International Experience and Knowledge | n | n | n | n | n | n | n | n | n | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Governance, Risk Oversight and Compliance | n | n | n | n | n | n | n | n | n | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Sales, Marketing and Brand Management | n | n | n | n | n | n | n | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Human Capital Management | n | n | n | n | n | n | n | n | n | ||||||||||||||||||||
| SaaS Scale | n | n | n | n | n | n | n | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Emerging Technologies and Business Models | n | n | n | n | n | n | n | n | n | ||||||||||||||||||||
Senior Leadership — Experience in senior leadership positions to analyze, advise and oversee management in decision making, operations and policies
Industry Expertise — Insight into the cloud, cybersecurity and software industries to oversee our business and the risks we face related to those industries
Financial Knowledge and Expertise — Knowledge of financial markets, financing and accounting and financial reporting processes
Public Company Board Experience — Experience to understand the dynamics and operation of a public company
Cybersecurity/Information Security — Leadership or significant experience overseeing and managing risks related to the protection and confidentiality of digital systems or data
Global/International Experience and Knowledge — Experience and knowledge of global operations, business conditions and culture to advise and oversee our global business
Governance, Risk Oversight and Compliance — Experience in public company corporate governance risk oversight and management, compliance, investor relations and creating long term sustainable value
Sales, Marketing and Brand Management — Sales, marketing and brand management experience to provide expertise to grow sales and enhance our brand
Human Capital Management — Experience attracting and retaining top talent to advise and oversee our people and compensation policies
SaaS Scale — Experience building or growing successful SaaS companies, reaching scale and maturity
Emerging Technologies and Business Models — Experience identifying and developing emerging technologies and business models to advise, analyze and strategize regarding emerging technologies, business models and potential acquisitions disrupting our industry, business and company
| 2025 Proxy Statement | 5 | ||||||
n BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Director Nominees
 Andrew Brown Age | 62 Class II Director Since | 2015 | Andrew Brown has served as chief executive officer of Sand Hill East LLC, a strategic management, investment and marketing services firm, since February 2014. Since 2006, he has also been the chief executive officer and co-owner of Biz Tectonics LLC, a privately held consulting company. From September 2010 to October 2013, Mr. Brown served as group chief technology officer of UBS Securities LLC, an investment bank. From 2008 to 2010, he served as head of strategy, architecture and optimization at Bank of America Merrill Lynch, the corporate and investment banking division of Bank of America. From 2006 to 2008, Mr. Brown served as chief technology officer of infrastructure at Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, an investment bank. He currently sits on the board of directors of Pure Storage, Inc., a data storage and management company, where he serves as the chair of the compensation committee and chair of the risk committee. Mr. Brown previously served on the board of directors of Guidewire Software, Inc., a provider of software products for property and casualty insurers. Mr. Brown holds a B.S. (Honors) in chemical physics from University College London. Mr. Brown also, recently, co-authored the book "Cybersecurity: 7 Steps for Boards of Directors". | |||||||||||||
We believe Mr. Brown is qualified to serve as a member of our board of directors based on his extensive experience as chief technology officer of multiple Fortune 500 companies, as well as his service on the board of directors of other publicly traded companies. | ||||||||||||||
 Scott Darling Age | 69 Class II Director Since | 2016 | Scott Darling has served as president of Dell Technologies Capital, the venture capital arm of Dell Technologies Inc., since September 2016. Prior to joining Dell Technologies upon its acquisition of EMC Corp., Mr. Darling was president of EMC Corporate Development and Ventures from March 2012 to September 2016, and in this role he was responsible for EMC’s business development and venture capital investment activity. Prior to joining EMC, Mr. Darling was a general partner at Frazier Technology Ventures II, L.P., which he joined in 2007, and was vice president and managing director at Intel Capital Corp., the venture capital arm of Intel Corporation, from 2000 to 2007. Mr. Darling previously served on the board of directors of DocuSign Inc., a provider of electronic signature technology and digital transaction management services. Mr. Darling holds a B.A. in economics from the University of California at Santa Cruz and an M.B.A. from the Stanford University Graduate School of Business. | |||||||||||||
We believe Mr. Darling is qualified to serve as a member of our board of directors based on his experience as a director of and as an investor in multiple technology companies. | ||||||||||||||
6 | 2025 Proxy Statement | | ||||||
BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE n
 David Schneider Age | 57 Class II Director Since | 2019 | David Schneider has served as a General Partner of Coatue Management, an investment firm focusing on technology companies, since February 2021. Mr. Schneider previously served as president, emeritus of ServiceNow, Inc., a cloud computing company, from July 2020 to December 2021, as president, global customer operations from January 2019 to July 2020, as chief revenue officer from June 2014 to January 2019 and as senior vice president of worldwide sales and services from June 2011 to May 2014. From July 2009 to March 2011, Mr. Schneider served as senior vice president of worldwide sales of the backup recovery systems division of EMC Corporation, a computer storage company acquired by Dell Technologies Inc. From January 2004 to July 2009, Mr. Schneider held senior positions at Data Domain, Inc., a data archiving and deduplication company acquired by EMC, most recently as Senior Vice President of Worldwide Sales. Mr. Schneider holds a B.A. in political science from the University of California, Irvine. | |||||||||||||
We believe Mr. Schneider is qualified to serve on our board of directors because of his knowledge and experience in operations and management at various technology companies. | ||||||||||||||
| 2025 Proxy Statement | 7 | ||||||
n BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Continuing Directors
 Jay Chaudhry Age | 67 Class III Director Since | 2007 | Jay Chaudhry is our co-founder and has served as our Chief Executive Officer and as Chairman of our board of directors since September 2007. Mr. Chaudhry holds an M.B.A. and an M.S. in electrical engineering and industrial engineering from the University of Cincinnati and a B. Tech in electronics engineering from the Indian Institute of Technology (Banaras Hindu University) Varanasi. | |||||||||||||
We believe Mr. Chaudhry is qualified to serve as a member of our board of directors because he is a security industry pioneer and an accomplished entrepreneur, having founded and built several companies, and based on the perspective, operational insight and expertise he has accumulated as our co-founder and our Chief Executive Officer. | ||||||||||||||
 James Beer Age | 64 Class III Director Since | 2024 | James Beer served as chief financial officer of Atlassian Corporation Plc, an enterprise software company, from February 2018 to June 2022. From September 2013 to December 2017, Mr. Beer served as executive vice president and chief financial officer of McKesson Corporation, a healthcare services and information technology company. Prior to McKesson Corporation, Mr. Beer served as executive vice president and chief financial officer of Symantec Corporation, now known as Gen Digital, a cybersecurity company, where he managed the worldwide finance organization. Prior to his work at Symantec, Mr. Beer served as chief financial officer or AMR Corp. and American Airlines Group Inc., AMR's principal subsidiary. Mr. Beer currently serves on the board of directors of Alaska Air Group, parent company of Alaska Airlines, DocuSign Inc. and Redis Ltd., a privately-held infrastructure software company. Mr. Beer previously served on the board of directors of ForeScout Technologies, Inc., a network security software company. Mr. Beer holds a B.S. in Aeronautical Engineering from Imperial College, London University, and an M.B.A. from Harvard University. | |||||||||||||
We believe Mr. Beer is qualified to serve as a member of our board of directors because of his substantial experience in corporate finance with public technology companies as well as his service on the board of directors of publicly traded companies. | ||||||||||||||
8 | 2025 Proxy Statement | | ||||||
BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE n
 Raj Judge Age | 59 Class III Director Since | 2025 | Raj Judge has served as our Executive Vice President of Corporate Strategy since May 2025. Prior to joining Zscaler, Mr. Judge spent over 25 years at Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, a law firm, where he advised on corporate securities matters including, venture capital financings, initial public offerings, acquisitions and board governance matters. Mr. Judge was a senior partner and Co-Chair of Emerging Companies and Venture Capital. Mr. Judge holds a B.A. in Economics from the University of California, Los Angeles and a J.D. | |||||||||||||
We believe Mr. Judge is qualified to serve as a member of our board of directors based on his extensive experience with public technology companies, including advising public company corporate strategy and board matters. | ||||||||||||||
 Karen Blasing Age | 69 Class I Director Since | 2017 | Karen Blasing served as the chief financial officer of Guidewire from July 2009 to March 2015. Prior to 2009, Ms. Blasing served as the chief financial officer for Force10 Networks, Inc. and as the senior vice president of finance for Salesforce.com, Inc. She has also served as chief financial officer for Nuance Communications, Inc. and Counterpane Internet Security, Inc. and held senior finance roles for Informix Corporation (now IBM Informix) and Oracle Corporation. She currently serves as a director of Autodesk, Inc., a multinational software corporation, where she serves as a chair of the compensation committee, and GitLab Inc., a DevSecOps platform company, where she serves as a member of the audit committee. Ms. Blasing previously served as a director of Ellie Mae, Inc. Ms. Blasing holds a B.A. in economics and business administration from the University of Montana and an M.B.A. from the University of Washington. | |||||||||||||
| We believe Ms. Blasing is qualified to serve as a member of our board of directors based on her extensive financial leadership and management experience at numerous SaaS and enterprise software companies. | ||||||||||||||
| 2025 Proxy Statement | 9 | ||||||
n BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
 Charles Giancarlo Age | 67 Class I Director Since | 2016 | Charles Giancarlo has served as chief executive officer of Pure Storage since August 2017. From January 2008 until October 2015, Mr. Giancarlo was a managing director and then strategic advisor of Silver Lake Partners, a private investment firm that focuses on technology-enabled and related growth industries. From May 1993 to December 2007, Mr. Giancarlo served in numerous senior executive roles at Cisco Systems, Inc., a provider of communications and networking products and services, ultimately as the executive vice president and chief development officer from May 2004 to December 2007. Mr. Giancarlo currently serves on the boards of directors of Arista Networks, Inc., a manufacturer of networking products, where he serves as the chair of the compensation committee, and Pure Storage. He previously served on the boards of directors of Accenture plc, Avaya, Inc., Imperva, Inc., ServiceNow, Inc., Netflix, Inc. and Tintri, Inc. Mr. Giancarlo holds a B.S. in electrical engineering and a B.A. in classical studies from Brown University, an M.S. in electrical engineering from the University of California, Berkeley and an M.B.A. from Harvard Business School. | |||||||||||||
We believe Mr. Giancarlo is qualified to serve as a member of our board of directors based on his extensive business expertise, including his current and prior executive level leadership, and his experience on the boards of publicly traded technology companies. | ||||||||||||||
 Eileen Naughton Age | 67 Class I Director Since | 2021 | Eileen Naughton served as the Chief People Officer and Vice President of People Operations at Google, Inc. from September 2016 to January 2021. Prior to September 2016, Ms. Naughton served in a variety of senior roles at Google dating back to 2006, including as Vice President and Managing Director for Google UK & Ireland and Vice President of Global Sales. Prior to joining Google in 2006, Ms. Naughton held a number of executive positions at Time Warner, including president of TIME Magazine. Ms. Naughton currently serves on the board of directors of Ares Management Corporation, an alternative investment manager operating in the credit, private equity and real estate markets. She previously served on the boards of directors of L’Oreal S.A. and The XO Group. Ms. Naughton holds a B.A. in international relations from the University of Pennsylvania, a Master of Arts from the Lauder Institute and a M.B.A. from the University of Pennsylvania. | |||||||||||||
We believe Ms. Naughton is qualified to serve on our board of directors because of her extensive director experience and her knowledge and experience in operations and management at multiple sophisticated companies. | ||||||||||||||
10 | 2025 Proxy Statement | | ||||||
BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE n
Director Independence
Our common stock is listed on the Nasdaq Global Select Market. Under the rules of Nasdaq, independent directors must comprise a majority of a listed company’s board of directors within a specified period after the completion of our initial public offering. In addition, the rules of Nasdaq require that, subject to specified exceptions, each member of a listed company’s audit, compensation and nominating and governance committees be independent. Audit committee members and compensation committee members must also satisfy the independence criteria set forth in Rule 10A-3 and Rule 10C-1, respectively, under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended, or the Exchange Act. Under the rules of Nasdaq, a director will only qualify as an “independent director” if, in the opinion of that company’s board of directors, that person does not have a relationship that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director.
To be considered independent for purposes of Rule 10A-3 and under the rules of Nasdaq, a member of an audit committee of a listed company may not, other than in his or her capacity as a member of our audit committee, our board of directors or any other board committee: (1) accept, directly or indirectly, any consulting, advisory or other compensatory fee from the listed company or any of its subsidiaries; or (2) be an affiliated person of the listed company or any of its subsidiaries.
To be considered independent for purposes of Rule 10C-1 and under the rules of Nasdaq, the board of directors must affirmatively determine that the member of the compensation committee is independent, including a consideration of all factors specifically relevant to determining whether the director has a relationship to the company which is material to that director’s ability to be independent from management in connection with the duties of a compensation committee member, including, but not limited to: (i) the source of compensation of such director, including any consulting, advisory or other compensatory fee paid by the company to such director; and (ii) whether such director is affiliated with the company, a subsidiary of the company or an affiliate of a subsidiary of the company.
Our board of directors has undertaken a review of its composition, the composition of its committees and the independence of our directors and considered whether any director has a material relationship with us that could compromise his or her ability to exercise independent judgment in carrying out his or her responsibilities. Based upon information requested from and provided by each director concerning his or her background, employment and affiliations, including family relationships, our board of directors has determined that (i) none of Mses. Blasing and Naughton and Messrs. Beer, Brown, Darling, Giancarlo and Schneider, representing seven of our nine directors, has a relationship that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director and (ii) each of these directors is “independent” as that term is defined under the rules of Nasdaq. Messrs. Chaudhry and Judge are not independent under Nasdaq’s independence standards. Our board of directors also determined that Ms. Blasing (chair) and Messrs. Beer, Brown and Darling, who comprise our audit committee, and Messrs. Brown (chair) and Giancarlo and Ms. Naughton, who comprise our compensation committee, satisfy the independence standards for committee members established by applicable Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, rules and the listing standards of Nasdaq.
In making these determinations, our board of directors considered the current and prior relationships that each non-employee director has with the Company and all other facts and circumstances our board of directors deemed relevant in determining their independence, including the beneficial ownership of our capital stock by each non-employee director, and any transactions involving them described in the section titled “Related Person Transactions.”
There are no family relationships among any of our directors or executive officers.
| 2025 Proxy Statement | 11 | ||||||
n BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Board Leadership Structure
Mr. Chaudhry currently serves as our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board. Our board of directors believes that the current board leadership structure, coupled with a strong emphasis on board independence, provides effective independent oversight of management while allowing the board and management to benefit from Mr. Chaudhry’s leadership, Company-specific experience and years of experience as an executive in the network security industry. Serving on our board of directors and as Chief Executive Officer since our founding in 2007, Mr. Chaudhry is best positioned to identify strategic priorities, lead critical discussion and execute our growth strategy and business plans. Mr. Chaudhry possesses detailed in-depth knowledge of the issues, opportunities and challenges facing us. The board of directors believes that Mr. Chaudhry’s combined role enables strong leadership, creates clear accountability and enhances our ability to communicate our message and strategy clearly and consistently to stockholders. The board of directors has not appointed a “lead independent director.” We believe that our board leadership structure is appropriate for our Company, particularly where we have a majority of independent directors who are all actively involved in board meetings.
Executive Sessions of Independent Directors
In order to encourage and enhance communication among independent directors, and as required under the applicable rules of Nasdaq, our corporate governance guidelines provide that the independent directors of our board of directors will meet in executive sessions without management directors or Company management present on a periodic basis, but no less than twice a year.
Board Meetings and Committees
During the fiscal year ended July 31, 2025, our board of directors held four meetings (including regularly scheduled and special meetings), and each director attended at least 75% of the aggregate of (i) the total number of meetings of our board of directors held during the period for which he or she served as a director and (ii) the total number of meetings held by all committees of our board of directors on which he or she served during the periods that he or she served.
Although we do not have a formal policy regarding attendance by members of our board of directors at annual meetings of stockholders, we encourage, but do not require, our directors to attend.
We have established an audit committee, a compensation committee and a nominating and corporate governance committee with the composition and responsibilities described below. We believe that the composition and the operation of these committees comply with the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the rules of Nasdaq and SEC rules and regulations.
12 | 2025 Proxy Statement | | ||||||
BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE n
Audit Committee
| Members | Responsibilities | ||||||||||
| Ms. Blasing (Chair) Mr. Beer Mr. Brown Mr. Darling | |||||||||||
▪selecting and hiring our registered public accounting firm; ▪evaluating the performance and independence of our registered public accounting firm; ▪approving the audit and pre-approving any non-audit services to be performed by our registered public accounting firm; ▪reviewing our financial statements and related disclosures and reviewing our critical accounting policies and practices; ▪reviewing the adequacy and effectiveness of our internal control policies and procedures and our disclosure controls and procedures; ▪overseeing procedures for the treatment of complaints on accounting, internal accounting controls or audit matters; ▪reviewing and discussing with management and the independent registered public accounting firm the results of our annual audit, our quarterly financial statements and our publicly filed reports; ▪cybersecurity risk assessment and management; ▪privacy risk assessment and management; ▪reviewing and approving any proposed related-person transactions; and ▪preparing the audit committee report that the SEC will require in our annual proxy statement. | |||||||||||
| Our board of directors has determined that all members of our audit committee meet the requirements for independence and financial literacy of audit committee members under current Nasdaq listing standards and SEC rules and regulations. Our audit committee chairperson, Ms. Blasing, and Mr. Beer are audit committee financial experts, as that term is defined under the SEC rules implementing Section 407 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and possess financial sophistication, as defined under Nasdaq listing standards. | |||||||||||
Our audit committee operates under a written charter that satisfies the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC and the listing requirements of Nasdaq. A copy of the charter of our audit committee is available on our website at http://ir.zscaler.com in the Governance Documents section of our Investor Relations webpage. During the fiscal year ended July 31, 2025, our audit committee held seven meetings.
| 2025 Proxy Statement | 13 | ||||||
n BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Compensation Committee
| Members | Responsibilities | ||||||||||
| Mr. Brown (Chair) Mr. Giancarlo Ms. Naughton | |||||||||||
▪reviewing and approving our chief executive officer’s and other executive officers’ annual base salaries, incentive compensation plans, including the specific goals and amounts, equity compensation, employment agreements, severance arrangements and change in control agreements and any other benefits, compensation or arrangements; ▪administering our equity compensation plans; ▪overseeing our overall compensation philosophy, compensation plans and benefits programs; and ▪preparing the compensation committee report in our annual proxy statement. | |||||||||||
| Our board of directors has determined that all members of our compensation committee meet the requirements for independence under the rules of Nasdaq and the SEC and are “non-employee directors” within the meaning of Rule 16b-3 under the Exchange Act. | |||||||||||
Our compensation committee operates under a written charter that satisfies the listing standards of Nasdaq. A copy of the charter of our compensation committee is available on our website at http://ir.zscaler.com in the Governance Documents section of our Investor Relations webpage. During the fiscal year ended July 31, 2025, our compensation committee held four meetings.
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
| Members | Responsibilities | ||||||||||
| Mr. Giancarlo (Chair) Mr. Darling Mr. Schneider | |||||||||||
▪evaluating and making recommendations regarding the composition, organization and governance of our board of directors and its committees; ▪evaluating and making recommendations regarding the creation of additional committees or the change in mandate or dissolution of committees; ▪reviewing and making recommendations with regard to our Corporate Governance Guidelines and compliance with laws and regulations, including corporate responsibility issues and disclosures; and ▪reviewing and approving conflicts of interest of our directors and corporate officers, other than related person transactions reviewed by the audit committee. | |||||||||||
| Our board of directors has determined that all members of our nominating and corporate governance committee meet the requirements for independence under the rules of Nasdaq. | |||||||||||
Our nominating and corporate governance committee operates under a written charter that satisfies the listing standards of Nasdaq. A copy of the charter of our nominating and corporate governance committee is available on our website at
http://ir.zscaler.com in the Governance Documents section of our Investor Relations webpage. During the fiscal year ended July 31, 2025, our nominating and corporate governance committee held three meetings.
http://ir.zscaler.com in the Governance Documents section of our Investor Relations webpage. During the fiscal year ended July 31, 2025, our nominating and corporate governance committee held three meetings.
14 | 2025 Proxy Statement | | ||||||
BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE n
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
None of the members of our compensation committee is or has been an officer or employee of the Company. None of our executive officers currently serves, or in the past year has served, as a member of the compensation committee or director (or other board committee performing equivalent functions or, in the absence of any such committee, the entire board of directors) of any entity that has one or more executive officers serving on our compensation committee or our board of directors.
Considerations in Evaluating Director Nominees
It is the policy of the nominating and corporate governance committee of our board of directors to consider recommendations for candidates to our board of directors from stockholders holding no less than one percent (1%) of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock continuously for at least 12 months prior to the date of the submission of the recommendation or nomination.
The nominating and corporate governance committee will use the following procedures to identify and evaluate any individual recommended or offered for nomination to our board of directors:
▪The nominating and corporate governance committee will consider candidates recommended by stockholders in the same manner as candidates recommended to the nominating and corporate governance committee from other sources.
▪In its evaluation of director candidates, including the members of our board of directors eligible for re-election, the nominating and corporate governance committee will consider factors such as:
◦business expertise, professional background and experience, education and skills;
◦past attendance at meetings, and participation in, and contributions to, the activities of our board of directors; and
◦other factors that the nominating and corporate governance committee deems appropriate.
▪The nominating and corporate governance committee requires the following minimum qualifications to be satisfied by any nominee for a position on our board of directors:
◦the highest personal and professional ethics and integrity;
◦proven achievement and competence in the nominee’s field and the ability to exercise sound business judgment;
◦skills that are complementary to those of the existing board of directors;
◦the ability to assist and support management and make significant contributions to the Company’s success; and
◦an understanding of the fiduciary responsibilities that are required of a member of our board of directors and the commitment of time and energy necessary to diligently carry out those responsibilities.
If the nominating and corporate governance committee determines that an additional or replacement director is required, the nominating and corporate governance committee may take such measures that it considers appropriate in connection with its evaluation of a director candidate, including candidate interviews, inquiry of the person or persons making the recommendation or nomination, engagement of an outside search firm to gather additional information, or reliance on the knowledge of the members of the nominating and corporate governance committee, our board directors or management.
The nominating and corporate governance committee may propose to our board of directors a candidate recommended or offered for nomination by a stockholder as a nominee for election to our board of directors. The nominating and corporate governance committee has in the past and may in the future pay fees to third parties to assist in identifying or evaluating director candidates.
| 2025 Proxy Statement | 15 | ||||||
n BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Stockholder Recommendations for Nominations to the Board of Directors
A stockholder that wants to recommend a candidate for election to our board of directors should direct the recommendation in writing by letter to the Company, attention of the Secretary, at Zscaler, Inc., 120 Holger Way, San Jose, California 95134. The recommendation must include the candidate’s name, home and business contact information, detailed biographical data, relevant qualifications, a signed letter from the candidate confirming willingness to serve, information regarding any relationships between the candidate and the Company and evidence of the recommending stockholder’s ownership of Company stock. Such recommendations must also include a statement from the recommending stockholder in support of the candidate, particularly within the context of the criteria for board membership, including issues of character, integrity, judgment, diversity of experience, independence, area of expertise, corporate experience, length of service, potential conflicts of interest, other commitments and the like and personal references.
A stockholder that instead desires to nominate a person directly for election to our board of directors at an annual meeting of the stockholders must meet the deadlines and other requirements set forth in Section 2.4 of the Company’s bylaws and SEC rules and regulations. Section 2.4 of the Company’s bylaws requires that a stockholder who seeks to nominate a candidate for director must provide a written notice to the Secretary of the Company not later than the close of business on the 45th day nor earlier than the close of business on the 75th day before the one-year anniversary of the date on which the corporation first mailed its proxy materials or a notice of availability of proxy materials (whichever is earlier) for the preceding year’s annual meeting; provided, however, that in the event that no annual meeting was held in the previous year or if the date of the annual meeting is changed by more than 30 days from the one-year anniversary of the date of the previous year’s annual meeting, then, for notice by the stockholder to be timely, it must be so received by the secretary not earlier than the close of business on the 120th day prior to such annual meeting and not later than the close of business on the later of (i) the 90th day prior to such annual meeting, or (ii) the 10th day following the day on which Public Announcement (as defined below) of the date of such annual meeting is first made. In no event shall any adjournment or postponement of an annual meeting or the announcement thereof commence a new time period for the giving of a stockholder’s notice. “Public Announcement” shall mean disclosure in a press release reported by the Dow Jones News Service, Associated Press or a comparable national news service or in a document publicly filed by the corporation with the SEC pursuant to Section 13, 14 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, or by such other means as is reasonably designed to inform the public or stockholders of the corporation in general of such information, including, without limitation, posting on the Company's investor relations website. In addition to satisfying the foregoing requirements under our bylaws, to comply with the universal proxy rules, stockholders who intend to solicit proxies in support of director nominees other than the Company’s nominees must also comply with the additional requirements of Rule 14a-19 under the Exchange Act.
16 | 2025 Proxy Statement | | ||||||
BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE n
Communications with the Board of Directors
Our board of directors believes that management speaks for Zscaler, Inc. However, individual board members may, from time to time, communicate with various constituencies that are involved with the Company, but it is expected that board members would do this with knowledge of management and, in most instances, only at the request of management.
In cases where stockholders and other interested parties wish to communicate directly with our non-management directors, messages can be sent to our Secretary, at Zscaler, Inc., 120 Holger Way, San Jose, California 95134. Our Secretary monitors these communications and will provide a summary of all received messages to the board of directors, or an appropriate committee of the board of directors, at each regularly scheduled quarterly meeting of the board. Where the nature of a communication warrants, our Secretary may determine, in his or her judgment, to obtain the more immediate attention of the board of directors, independent directors, appropriate committees, or members of committees of the board, independent advisors to the Company or Company management, as our Secretary considers appropriate.
Our Secretary may decide in the exercise of his or her judgment whether a response to any stockholder or interested party communication is necessary.
This procedure for stockholder and other interested party communications with the non-management directors is overseen by the Company’s nominating and corporate governance committee. This procedure does not apply to communications to non-management directors from officers or directors of the Company who are stockholders, stockholder proposals submitted pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act or communications to the audit committee pursuant to the Complaint Procedures for Accounting and Auditing Matters.
Stockholder Engagement
As part of our year-round stockholder engagement program and a vital component of our overall corporate governance program, Zscaler meets with, and constantly strives to incorporate feedback from, our stockholders. Our Investor Relations team regularly meets with investors, prospective investors and investment analysts to discuss Company performance, technology initiatives and company strategy. Meetings can include participation by our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Legal Officer, other members of management and members of our board of directors. In addition, our Investor Relations team regularly engages with the governance departments of our stockholders and seeks feedback on topics of interest to them, including on our corporate governance, executive and director compensation and corporate responsibility practices. Our Investor Relations team, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Legal Officer regularly communicate topics discussed and feedback from stockholders with our senior management and board of directors for consideration.
| 2025 Proxy Statement | 17 | ||||||
n BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
In fiscal 2025, our management team held 102 meetings with current and prospective stockholders, including meetings with 52% of our top 25 largest stockholders. We continuously communicate with stockholders and other stakeholders through various media, including our annual report and SEC filings, proxy statement, news releases, quarterly earnings calls, our website and our Annual Meeting. Below is a summary of some of the key feedback on certain governance topics that we received since we filed our fiscal 2024 Proxy Statement:
| Common Discussion Points | Our Viewpoint | ||||
| No lead independent director for Zscaler's board of directors | Stockholders have asked why our board does not have a lead independent director to work with our Chairman and CEO. We believe that, while a lead independent director might be valuable in some companies, such a role would undermine our highly effective board culture where all independent directors work directly with our Chairman and CEO on matters within their areas of interest and expertise. Our board consists of a majority of independent directors and regularly meets in executive session as appropriate. Additionally, all three of our board committees are composed entirely of independent directors. We believe all independent board members are empowered to guide the Company, and this fosters a collaborative dynamic which could be impaired by the presence of a single lead independent director. While in the future we may find it beneficial or necessary to appoint a lead independent director, currently, we feel our board structure provides an appropriate check against undue management influence while preserving the board culture that has driven our success. | ||||
| Payment of annual cash bonuses | Stockholders have asked about the application of discretion by our CEO in determining the bonuses of our executive officers. As described in the "Executive Compensation" section, the entire cash bonus pool allocated to our executive officers is funded based on attainment of revenue, billings and non-GAAP income from operations performance metrics determined by our compensation committee. However, the actual payment to our Named Executive Officers is subject to downward adjustment by our CEO. Specifically, our CEO considers non-public corporate and individual performance metrics in exercising discretion only to reduce bonus payments below what is allowed by the funded amount of the bonus pool. For example in the first half performance period of fiscal 2024, our CEO exercised his downward discretion such that the actual full year payout to Named Executive Officers was 108.7% of their target bonuses, which was below the full year total funded pool of 118.3%. We believe this gives our CEO latitude to ensure executive pay reflects the best interests of our stockholders and aligns with performance against a wide variety of strategic and performance objectives. | ||||
| Charles Giancarlo "Overboarding" | Stockholders have expressed concerns about Mr. Giancarlo sitting on the boards of directors of three public companies including Zscaler while also serving as the chief executive officer of one company. We feel that Mr. Giancarlo provides a unique combination of invaluable experience, skills and perspectives that are relevant for Zscaler's market, technology and stage of growth as a result of his past and, especially, his current roles. During the last five fiscal years, Mr. Giancarlo has missed only one board or committee meeting. In addition, Mr. Giancarlo regularly makes himself available for informal meetings with our CEO and other members of management. During these formal and informal meetings, we believe that Mr. Giancarlo provides critical advice and insights which benefit our stockholders. | ||||
| Anti-takeover provisions | Stockholders have asked about our anti-takeover provisions including our classified board and our board's ability to issue preferred shares of stock without a stockholder vote. With cybersecurity taking center-stage for many companies, Zscaler is filling a critical need for our customers. Part of that need centers around long-term stability of our products and our Company as a whole. We feel that the anti-takeover measures, that have been deemed reasonable and appropriate by both our management and board of directors, support this long-term stability, which is increasingly seen as vital by our customers, partners and employees. In addition, and as discussed in our opposition statement to Proposal 5 in this Proxy Statement, our classified board structure enables our directors to prioritize long-term, sustainable growth, supports our customer relationships and long-term innovation commitments and promotes orderly board refreshment. As a result, we believe that our anti-takeover provisions are reasonable for our Company’s size, growth rate and industry and support long-term value creation for our stockholders. | ||||
18 | 2025 Proxy Statement | | ||||||
BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE n
Corporate Governance Guidelines and Code of Conduct
Our board of directors has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines. These guidelines address items such as the qualifications and responsibilities of our directors and director candidates and corporate governance policies and standards applicable to us in general. In addition, our board of directors has adopted a Code of Conduct that applies to all of our employees, officers and directors, including our chief executive officer, chief financial officer and other executive and senior financial officers. The full text of our Corporate Governance Guidelines and our Code of Conduct is posted on our website at http://ir.zscaler.com in the Governance Documents section of our Investor Relations webpage. We will post any amendments to our Code of Conduct, and any waivers of our Code of Conduct for directors and executive officers, on the same website.
Role of the Board of Directors in Risk Oversight
One of the key functions of our board of directors is informed oversight of our risk management process which risks include, among others, strategic, financial, business and operational, cybersecurity, legal and regulatory compliance and reputational risks. Our board of directors does not have a standing risk management committee but rather administers this oversight function directly through the board of directors as a whole, as well as through its standing committees that address risks inherent in their respective areas of oversight. In particular, our board of directors is responsible for monitoring and assessing strategic risk exposure. Our audit committee is responsible for reviewing and discussing our major financial risk exposures and the steps our management has taken to monitor and control these exposures, including guidelines and policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management, including oversight of the performance of our internal audit function. In addition to oversight of the performance of our external and internal audit functions, our audit committee also monitors compliance with legal and regulatory requirements and reviews related party transactions. Our audit committee responsibilities also include oversight of cybersecurity risk management, and, to that end, members of the audit committee meet frequently with management and Company leadership responsible for cybersecurity risk management and receive periodic reports from management, as well as incremental reports as matters arise. Our nominating and corporate governance committee monitors the effectiveness of our corporate governance guidelines and oversees our Corporate Responsibility program. Our compensation committee assesses and monitors whether any of our compensation policies and programs has the potential to encourage excessive risk-taking.
Director Compensation
Each non-employee director is eligible to receive compensation for his or her service consisting of annual cash retainers and equity awards under our outside director compensation policy. Our outside director compensation policy was crafted in consultation with Compensia, Inc., or Compensia, an independent compensation consulting firm engaged by our compensation committee. Compensia provided us with competitive data, analysis and recommendations regarding non-employee director compensation, which includes a mix of cash and equity-based compensation. After careful consideration of this information and the scope of the duties and responsibilities of our non-employee directors, our board of directors approved our outside director compensation policy. We believe this policy provides reasonable compensation to our non-employee directors that is commensurate with their contributions and appropriately aligned with our peers. We also reimburse our directors for expenses associated with attending meetings of our board of directors and board committees.
| 2025 Proxy Statement | 19 | ||||||
n BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
For fiscal 2025, non-employee directors were entitled to receive the following cash compensation for service in the following positions:
| Position | Annual Retainer ($) | |||||||
| Board Member | 40,000 | |||||||
| Audit Committee Chair | 25,000 | |||||||
| Audit Committee Member | 12,500 | |||||||
| Compensation Committee Chair | 20,000 | |||||||
| Compensation Committee Member | 10,000 | |||||||
| Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Chair | 12,000 | |||||||
| Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Member | 6,000 | |||||||
In addition, effective as of the date of the 2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, non-employee directors were eligible to receive the following equity awards for board service:
(1)Annual restricted stock unit, or RSU, grant with target value of $260,000 (automatically granted at the Annual Meeting). These RSU awards vest in four equal quarterly installments over a one-year period; and
(2)Initial RSU grant with a target value of $500,000 (automatically granted on the date of appointment or election), pursuant to which one-third of the RSU awards will vest on the first Quarterly Vesting Date (as defined in the FY2018 Equity Incentive Plan or the form of award agreement thereunder) following the one-year anniversary of the effective date of appointment and the remaining RSU awards will vest in eight equal quarterly installments thereafter. Any director elected at the Annual Meeting for a given year will receive both the initial RSU grant and the annual RSU grant.
The number of RSU awards for each of the initial and annual RSU grant will be determined by dividing the annual equity value by the average closing price of Zscaler common stock on the Nasdaq Global Select Market for the 30 trading days ending on the date that is five days prior to the grant date, rounded up to the nearest share.
All cash payments to non-employee directors who served in the relevant capacity at any point during the immediately preceding prior fiscal quarter will be paid quarterly in arrears on a pro-rated basis. A non-employee director who served in the relevant capacity during only a portion of the prior fiscal quarter will receive a pro-rated payment of the quarterly payment of the applicable cash retainer.
DIRECTOR STOCK OWNERSHIP GUIDELINES
We believe that our directors should hold a significant amount of Company equity to link their long-term economic interests directly to those of our stockholders. For fiscal 2025, we required that our directors own at minimum equity of the Company valued at five times their annual retainer for service on our board of directors (not including committee service). We believe that this multiple constitutes significant amounts for our directors and provides a substantial link between the interests of our directors and those of our stockholders. Compliance with these guidelines for non-employee directors is required within five years of becoming subject to them. For purposes of meeting the ownership requirements, unvested RSU awards are counted, but unearned performance awards and unexercised stock options are not. At the end of fiscal 2025, each of our non-employee directors exceeded these guidelines based on their current rate of stock accumulations in the time frames set out in the guidelines.
20 | 2025 Proxy Statement | | ||||||
BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE n
The following table sets forth information regarding compensation earned by or paid to our non-employee directors during the fiscal year ended July 31, 2025:
| Name | Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($) | Stock Awards ($)(1) | Total ($) | |||||||||||||||||
| James Beer | 48,875 | 248,684 | 297,558 | |||||||||||||||||
| Karen Blasing | 61,250 | 248,684 | 309,934 | |||||||||||||||||
| Andrew Brown | 66,875 | 248,684 | 315,559 | |||||||||||||||||
| Scott Darling | 54,375 | 248,684 | 303,509 | |||||||||||||||||
| Charles Giancarlo | 57,125 | 248,684 | 305,809 | |||||||||||||||||
| Eileen Naughton | 46,250 | 248,684 | 294,934 | |||||||||||||||||
| David Schneider | 43,000 | 248,684 | 291,684 | |||||||||||||||||
(1)Amounts represent the grant date fair market value of RSU awards granted to serving directors following our 2024 annual meeting of stockholders.
The following table lists all outstanding equity awards held by our non-employee directors as of July 31, 2025.
| Name | Aggregate Number of Stock Awards Outstanding as of July 31, 2025 (#) | Aggregate Number of Stock Options Outstanding as of July 31, 2025 (#) | ||||||
| James Beer | 2,541 | — | ||||||
| Karen Blasing | 654 | — | ||||||
| Andrew Brown | 654 | — | ||||||
| Scott Darling | 654 | — | ||||||
| Charles Giancarlo | 654 | — | ||||||
| Eileen Naughton | 654 | — | ||||||
| David Schneider | 654 | — | ||||||
For information about the compensation of directors who are also our employees, see “Executive Compensation.”
| 2025 Proxy Statement | 21 | ||||||
n BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Corporate Responsibility
We believe a thoughtful, robust and deliberate Corporate Responsibility program will drive sustained value creation for our stakeholders. We focus on a range of initiatives centered around environmental sustainability, human capital, protection of customers and their data and building trust through good corporate governance. From Zscaler's inception, we have relied upon our strong cultural values to guide ethical business practices, and to do what is right for our customers and our business. We established a Zscaler Code of Conduct, reflecting strong ethical principles, to communicate our expectations to employees, and we implemented a supplier code of conduct to communicate our ethical expectation to our vendors and suppliers. We continuously assess our operations to seek opportunities for improvement, all while evaluating and addressing risks as they arise.
As part of this ongoing process, our board maintains oversight over corporate responsibility matters through our nominating and corporate governance committee, while our executive management team manages and monitors such matters on a day-to-day basis throughout the year.
Our customers rely on us to provide secure and fast access to essential applications. They entrust us to safeguard their sensitive and critical information. For these reasons, forging partnerships built on trust, transparency and accountability is central to our success. We are customer obsessed and understand that our success depends on our ability to deliver innovative solutions which anticipate the evolving needs of our customers.
SECURING TRUST
Governance, Risk and Accountability
Our corporate governance structure enables the executive team and our board to effectively guide our business while we continue to rapidly grow. Our internal audit team reviews our corporate practices annually to provide reasonable assurance that they are in line with best practices and to monitor compliance throughout our organization. Accountability for overseeing risk extends to the board level. Our nominating and corporate governance committee oversees our governance policies and Corporate Responsibility program and our audit committee oversees privacy and cybersecurity risks.
Platform and Certifications
Our Zero Trust Exchange cloud security platform is distributed over more than 160 data centers and processes over 500 billion transactions per day from users across over 185 countries. We work to ensure our platform and protocols meet the rigorous requirements of our customers around the globe and strive to provide secure, compliant services regardless of a user's physical location. We hold certifications under numerous government and commercial standards programs.
Cybersecurity Risk Management Approach
We constantly evaluate our performance and strengthen the security of our products to anticipate the evolving threat landscape. Zscaler’s internal security committee identifies and prioritizes protective measures across our products and enterprise. The group comprises key functional leaders across the Company who share critical information and use data-driven strategies to manage cyber risks. Our in-house global threat research team, Zscaler ThreatLabZ, has a mission to protect our customers from advanced cyberthreats. Armed with insights from over half a trillion daily signals from our platform, this team of more than 150 security experts continuously identifies and prevents emerging threats. Finally, all Zscaler employees complete annual information security training to protect our Company’s assets.
22 | 2025 Proxy Statement | | ||||||
BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE n
User Privacy
Our customers’ data belongs to them. While we do not store customer content, keeping our customers’ data secure and private while providing smooth and continuous service is a top priority. Zscaler is committed to assisting our customers' efforts to comply with privacy laws and, with this goal in mind, we implement technical and organizational measures for customer data that passes through our platform. Customer data is isolated as part of our multi-tenant architecture, and depending on the product, customers have the option to select the log storage location from our more than 160 global data centers.
ENABLING POSSIBILITY FOR PEOPLE
Our Culture
The Zscaler difference stems from a global team that is technically skilled, forward thinking and aligned to our mission. We are visionaries and operators who are passionate about creating a safer future. Guided by our values, we are invested in building our workplace culture, which allows our team to execute and contribute to our customers’ and our own success. We were recognized for these efforts by being named one of Fortune’s Best Workplaces in Technology in 2025 and one of Fortune's Best Workplaces in the Bay Area in 2025.
Employee Development
We support our growth by attracting and retaining a highly skilled workforce and offer many resources for employees to develop and advance their careers. We invest in leadership, individual contributor training and continuing education for our employees. By providing learning and advancement opportunities, we keep employees engaged, which is evidenced by strong results in employee surveys.
Community
We understand that Zscaler is a part of the communities where we operate. Our community efforts include organized volunteer activities and employee-driven community giving. We collect input from our employees to help choose the organizations that Zscaler supports and help to amplify our employees' own giving through donation matching.
EMBEDDING ENVIRONMENTAL EFFICIENCY
Efficient Architecture
Zscaler’s cloud-based architecture provides a much needed, energy efficient alternative to legacy security solutions. Whereas legacy solutions require numerous appliances and servers to be deployed across an organization, we enable our customers to lower their environmental impact by providing a platform which is purpose-built for efficiency, speed and scalability. By moving to the Zscaler Zero Trust ExchangeTM platform, customers improve their security and user experience all while reducing the need to purchase and run their own security appliances. This reduction in IT footprint enables customers to significantly reduce the energy needs associated with their security programs.
Data Centers
We stay close to our users to provide them with the best user experience possible, which means building our cloud platform in data centers across the world in regions where our customers are located. We focus on maintaining the use of 100% renewable energy to power our cloud platform. Our data center selection and renewal process incorporates environmental sustainability criteria, including data center efficiency and use of renewable energy.
| 2025 Proxy Statement | 23 | ||||||
PROPOSAL 01
Election of Directors
Our board of directors is currently composed of nine members. In accordance with our certificate of incorporation, our board of directors is divided into three classes with staggered three-year terms. One class is elected each year at the annual meeting of stockholders for a term of three years. At the Annual Meeting, three Class II directors will be elected for a three-year term to succeed the same class, consisting of three directors, whose term is then expiring.
Each director’s term continues until the election and qualification of such director’s successor, or such director’s earlier death, resignation or removal. Any increase in the number of directors will be distributed among the three classes so that, as nearly as possible, each class will consist of one-third of our directors. This classification of our board of directors may have the effect of delaying or preventing changes in control of the Company. However, as discussed in our opposition statement to Proposal 5 in this Proxy Statement, our classified board structure enables our directors to prioritize long-term, sustainable growth, supports our customer relationships and long-term innovation commitments and promotes orderly board refreshment, resulting in, we believe, long-term value creation for our stockholders.
Nominees
Our board of directors has nominated Andrew Brown, Scott Darling and David Schneider for election as Class II directors at the Annual Meeting. If elected, each of Mr. Brown, Mr. Darling and Mr. Schneider will serve as Class II directors until the 2028 annual meeting of stockholders or until their successors are elected and qualified, or their earlier death, resignation or removal. All three nominees are currently directors of the Company. For information concerning the nominees, see “Board of Directors and Corporate Governance.”
If you are a stockholder of record and you sign your proxy card or vote over the internet or by telephone but do not give instructions with respect to the voting of directors, your shares will be voted FOR the election of Mr. Brown, Mr. Darling and Mr. Schneider. We expect that Mr. Brown, Mr. Darling and Mr. Schneider will accept such nomination; however, in the event that a director nominee is unable or declines to serve as a director at the time of the Annual Meeting, the proxies will be voted for any nominee who shall be designated by our board of directors to fill such vacancy. If you are a beneficial owner of shares of our common stock and you do not give voting instructions to your broker, bank or other nominee, then your broker, bank or other nominee will leave your shares unvoted on this matter.
Vote Required
The election of the Class II directors requires a plurality of the voting power of the shares of our common stock present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote thereon. Accordingly, the three nominees receiving the highest number of “FOR” votes will be elected. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on this proposal.
 | The Board of Directors recommends a vote “FOR” the election of each of the three directors nominated by our Board of Directors and named in this Proxy Statement as the Class II Directors to serve for a three-year term. | |||||||||||||
| 2025 Proxy Statement | 25 | ||||||
PROPOSAL 02
Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Our audit committee has appointed PwC as our independent registered public accounting firm to audit our consolidated financial statements for our fiscal year ending July 31, 2026. PwC has served as our independent registered public accounting firm since May 2015.
At the Annual Meeting, stockholders are being asked to ratify the appointment of PwC as our independent registered public accounting firm for our fiscal year ending July 31, 2026. Stockholder ratification of the appointment of PwC is not required by our bylaws or other applicable legal requirements. However, our board of directors is submitting the appointment of PwC to our stockholders for ratification as a matter of good corporate governance. In the event that this appointment is not ratified by the affirmative vote of a majority of the voting power of the shares of our common stock present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote, such appointment will be reconsidered by our audit committee. Even if the appointment is ratified, our audit committee, in its sole discretion, may appoint another independent registered public accounting firm at any time during our fiscal year ending July 31, 2026 if our audit committee believes that such a change would be in the best interests of Zscaler and its stockholders. If the appointment is not ratified by our stockholders, the audit committee may reconsider whether it should appoint another independent registered public accounting firm. A representative of PwC is expected to be present at the Annual Meeting, will have an opportunity to make a statement if he or she wishes to do so, and is expected to be available to respond to appropriate questions from stockholders.
Fees Paid to the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The following table presents fees for professional audit services and other services rendered to us by PwC for our fiscal years ended July 31, 2025 and 2024.
| Fees | 2025 ($) | 2024 ($) | ||||||||||||
Audit Fees(1) | 4,031,432 | 3,749,966 | ||||||||||||
| Tax Fees | 561,500 | 529,040 | ||||||||||||
All Other Fees(2) | 452,700 | 806,962 | ||||||||||||
| Total Fees Paid | 5,045,632 | 5,085,968 | ||||||||||||
(1)Audit Fees consist of fees for professional services rendered in connection with the audit of our annual consolidated financial statements, the review of our quarterly condensed consolidated financial statements, statutory audit fees and audit services that are normally provided by the independent registered public accounting firm in connection with regulatory filings.
(2)All Other Fees consist of aggregate fees billed for products and services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm other than those disclosed above. These services specifically relate to subscription fees paid for access to online accounting research software and regulatory applications and certifications, including Information System Security Management and Assessment Program certification.
26 | 2025 Proxy Statement | | ||||||
PROPOSAL TWO n
Auditor Independence
In the fiscal year ended July 31, 2025, there were no other professional services provided by PwC that would have required our audit committee to consider their compatibility with maintaining the independence of PwC.
Audit Committee Policy on Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Our audit committee has established a policy governing our use of the services of our independent registered public accounting firm. Under the policy, our audit committee is required to pre-approve all audit and permissible non-audit services performed by our independent registered public accounting firm in order to ensure that the provision of such services does not impair such accounting firm’s independence. All fees paid to PwC for our fiscal years ended July 31, 2025 and 2024 were pre-approved by our audit committee.
Vote Required
The ratification of the appointment of PwC requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the voting power of the shares present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote thereon. Abstentions will have the effect of a vote AGAINST the proposal.
| The Board of Directors recommends a vote “FOR” the ratification of the appointment of PwC as our independent registered public accounting firm for our fiscal year ending July 31, 2026. | |||||||||||||
Audit Committee Report
The information contained in the following Audit Committee Report shall not be deemed to be soliciting material or to be filed with the SEC, nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that Zscaler, Inc. specifically incorporates it by reference in such filing.
The audit committee serves as the representative of our board of directors with respect to its oversight of:
▪our accounting and financial reporting processes and the audit of our financial statements;
▪the integrity of our financial statements;
▪our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements;
▪inquiring about significant risks, reviewing our policies for risk assessment and risk management, including privacy and cybersecurity risk, and assessing the steps management has taken to control these risks; and
▪the independent registered public accounting firm’s appointment, qualifications and independence.
The audit committee also reviews the performance of our independent registered public accounting firm, PwC, in the annual audit of our financial statements and in assignments unrelated to the audit and reviews the independent registered public accounting firm’s fees.
The audit committee is currently composed of four non-employee directors. Our board of directors has determined that each current member of the audit committee is independent, and that Ms. Blasing and Mr. Beer each qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” under the SEC rules.
| 2025 Proxy Statement | 27 | ||||||
n PROPOSAL TWO
The audit committee provides our board of directors such information and materials as it may deem necessary to make our board of directors aware of financial matters requiring the attention of our board of directors. The audit committee reviews our financial disclosures and meets privately, outside the presence of our management, with our independent registered public accounting firm. In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the audit committee reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements in our Annual Report with management, including a discussion of the quality and substance of the accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant judgments made in connection with the audited financial statements and the clarity of disclosures in the financial statements. The audit committee reports on these meetings to our board of directors.
The audit committee has reviewed and discussed with Zscaler’s management and PwC the audited consolidated financial statements of Zscaler contained in Zscaler’s Annual Report. The audit committee has also discussed with PwC the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, or PCAOB, and the SEC.
The audit committee has received and reviewed the written disclosures and the letter from PwC required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding PwC’s communications with the audit committee concerning independence, and has discussed with PwC its independence from Zscaler.
Based on the review and discussions referred to above, the audit committee recommended to the board of directors that the audited consolidated financial statements be included in Zscaler’s Annual Report for filing with the SEC. The audit committee also has selected PwC as the independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2026. Our board of directors recommends that stockholders ratify this selection at the Annual Meeting.
Respectfully submitted by the members of the audit committee of the board of directors:
Karen Blasing (Chair)
James Beer
James Beer
Andrew Brown
Scott Darling
Scott Darling
28 | 2025 Proxy Statement | | ||||||
PROPOSAL 03
Advisory Vote on the Compensation of Our Named Executive Officers
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 and Section 14A of the Exchange Act enable stockholders to approve, on an advisory or non-binding basis, the compensation of our Named Executive Officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement in accordance with the rules of the SEC. This proposal, commonly known as a “Say-on-Pay” proposal, gives our stockholders the opportunity to express their views on our Named Executive Officers’ compensation as a whole. This vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation or any specific Named Executive Officer, but rather the overall compensation of all of our Named Executive Officers and the philosophy, policies and practices described in this Proxy Statement.
The Say-on-Pay vote is advisory, and therefore is not binding on us, our compensation committee or our board of directors. The Say-on-Pay vote will, however, provide information to us regarding investor sentiment about our executive compensation philosophy, policies and practices, which our compensation committee will be able to consider when determining executive compensation for the remainder of the current fiscal year and beyond. Our board of directors and our compensation committee value the opinions of our stockholders. To the extent there is any significant vote against the compensation of our Named Executive Officer as disclosed in this Proxy Statement, we will endeavor to communicate with stockholders to better understand the concerns that influenced the vote and consider our stockholders’ concerns. Our compensation committee will evaluate whether any actions are necessary to address those concerns.
We believe that the information provided in the section titled “Executive Compensation,” and in particular the information discussed in the section titled “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Compensation Philosophy and Objectives,” demonstrates that our executive compensation program was designed appropriately and is working to ensure management’s interests are aligned with our stockholders’ interests to support long-term value creation. Accordingly, we ask our stockholders to vote “FOR” the following resolution at the Annual Meeting:
“RESOLVED, that the stockholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation paid to the Named Executive Officers, as disclosed in the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC, including the compensation discussion and analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussion, and other related disclosure.”
Vote Required
The advisory vote on the compensation of our Named Executive Officers requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the voting power of the shares of our common stock present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote thereon. Abstentions will have the effect of a vote AGAINST the proposal. Broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of the vote.
| The Board of Directors recommends a vote “FOR” the approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our Named Executive Officers. | |||||||||||||
| 2025 Proxy Statement | 29 | ||||||
PROPOSAL 04
Advisory Vote on the Frequency of Future Stockholder Advisory Votes on the Compensation of Our Named Executive Officers
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 and Section 14A of the Exchange Act enable stockholders to indicate their preference at least once every six years regarding how frequently we should solicit a non-binding advisory vote on the compensation of our Named Executive Officers as disclosed in our proxy statement. The proposal, commonly known as a “Say-When-on-Pay” proposal, asks our stockholders to indicate whether they would prefer an advisory vote every one year, two years, or three years. Alternatively, stockholders may abstain from casting a vote. The Say-When-on-Pay vote is advisory, and therefore is not binding on us, our compensation committee or our board of directors.
After considering the benefits and consequences of each alternative, our board of directors recommends that the advisory vote on the compensation of our Named Executive Officers be submitted to the stockholders every year. In formulating its recommendation, our board of directors considered that compensation decisions are made annually and that an annual advisory vote on the compensation of our Named Executive Officers will allow stockholders to provide more frequent and direct input on our compensation philosophy, policies and practices.
Vote Required
The alternative among one year, two years or three years that receives the highest number of votes cast at the Annual Meeting by stockholders entitled to vote thereon will be deemed to be the frequency preferred by our stockholders. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on this proposal.
While our board of directors believes that its recommendation is appropriate at this time, the stockholders are not voting to approve or disapprove that recommendation, but are instead asked to indicate their preference, on an advisory basis, as to whether non-binding future stockholder advisory votes on the compensation of our Named Executive Officers should be held every year, two years or three years.
Although the vote is non-binding, our board of directors and our compensation committee value the opinions of our stockholders in this matter. To the extent there is any significant vote in favor of one time period over another, our board of directors and compensation committee will consider the outcome of this vote when making future decisions regarding the frequency of holding future stockholder advisory votes on the compensation of our Named Executive Officers.
| The Board of Directors recommends a vote to hold future stockholder advisory votes on the compensation of our Named Executive Officers every “ONE YEAR.” | |||||||||||||
30 | 2025 Proxy Statement | | ||||||
PROPOSAL 05
Stockholder Proposal:
Board Declassification
Board Declassification
Proposal 5 is a proposal that we received from a stockholder. If the stockholder submitting the proposal, or an authorized representative, is present at our Annual Meeting and submits the proposal for a vote, then the proposal will be voted on. The proposal is required to be voted on at our Annual Meeting only if properly presented.
The text of the proposal and supporting statement appear exactly as received from the stockholder unless otherwise noted. All statements contained in the proposal, and the supporting statement and graphics accompanying the proposal, are the sole responsibility of the stockholder, and neither we nor our board of directors accepts responsibility for the accuracy or content of these statements. The proposal may contain assertions about Zscaler or other matters that we believe are incorrect.
This proposal is not binding on Zscaler or our board of directors. Notwithstanding the advisory nature of this proposal, our board of directors values the priorities and perspectives of our stockholders and will consider the outcome of the vote when considering whether and how to implement this proposal.
The response from our board of directors on the proposal is presented immediately after the proposal. We recommend that you vote AGAINST the stockholder proposal.
Stockholder Proposal
ELECT EACH DIRECTOR ANNUALLY - PROPOSAL 5
RESOLVED: Zscaler, Inc. (“Company”) shareholders, including James McRitchie of CorpGov.net, ask that our Company take all steps necessary to reorganize the Board of Directors into one class with each director subject to election each year for a one-year term so that all directors are elected annually.
Although our management can adopt this proposal topic in one year, and one-year implementation is a best practice, this proposal allows the option to be phased in.
Supporting Statement: Fully 90% of S&P 500 Companies have declassified boards. Annual elections are widely viewed as a best practice. Annual election of each director makes directors more accountable, improving performance and increasing company value.
According to “What Matters in Corporate Governance” by Lucien Bebchuk, Alma Cohen, and Allen Ferrell of the Harvard Law School, classified boards like ours are one of six entrenching mechanisms negatively related to company performance.
Diligent’s Market Intelligence database includes the voting record of 24 shareholder resolutions to declassify boards during the period 2020 – 11/1/2024. They averaged 74% support. Only one proposal on this topic out of seven is reported to have received less than 50% of the vote in 2024.
| 2025 Proxy Statement | 31 | ||||||
n PROPOSAL FIVE
BlackRock states, “Directors should be elected annually to discourage entrenchment and allow shareholders sufficient opportunity to exercise their oversight of the board.” Vanguard generally votes for proposals to declassify an existing board and votes against management or shareholder proposals to create a classified board.
According to Equilar, a trusted leader for corporate leadership data:
A classified board creates concern among shareholders because poorly performing directors may benefit from an electoral reprieve. Moreover, a fraternal atmosphere may form from a staggered board that favors the interests of management above those of shareholders. Since directors in a declassified board are elected and evaluated each year, declassification promotes responsiveness to shareholder demands and pressures directors to perform to retain their seat. Notably, proxy advisory firms ISS and Glass Lewis both support declassified structures.
The annual election of each director gives shareholders more leverage if management performs poorly. For instance, if the Board approves excessive or poorly incentivized executive pay, shareholders can soon vote against the Chair of the Compensation Committee, rather than waiting three years under the current setup.
Consider our Company’s overall corporate governance:
Directors can be elected when unopposed, even if they receive one percent of the vote and can only be removed “for cause.” We cannot call special meetings. Changing specific bylaw provisions requires a 66 2/3 % vote.
Freefloat Analytics estimates one director holds 74% of “board influence.”
Enhance Shareholder Value, Vote FOR
Elect Each Director Annually - Proposal 5
Statement in Opposition to the Stockholder Proposal
Our board of directors has carefully evaluated the proposal and, for the reasons described below, believes that the proposal is not in the best interests of our stockholders. We recommend that you vote AGAINST the stockholder proposal.
Long-Term Focus
We are committed to strong corporate governance, and our board of directors regularly reviews our governance structure, including our classified board. Our board of directors is divided into three classes, and each class is elected to serve a three-year term. Our board of directors believes that annual elections of all directors lead to a board of directors that is short-term focused on immediate results. A classified board encourages and enables directors to consider the long-term best interests of our stockholders, allowing directors to focus on strategic initiatives and sustainable growth, without the distraction of annual campaign cycles. This approach strengthens director independence by reducing potential susceptibility to hostile acquisitions, short-term activist pressures or special interest agendas that may be harmful to the Company and our stockholders. Our board of directors also believes that our classified board structure enables us to recruit highly qualified directors who can dedicate sufficient time to develop a deep understanding of our business and contribute to our strategic direction.
Continuity and Stability
Our classified board provides stability and ensures continuity of directors with substantial industry experience and knowledge of our business, history and strategic goals. Directors who understand our Company and business are a valuable resource and are well-positioned to make decisions in the best interests of our stockholders. A declassified board structure creates the risk that our entire board could be replaced in a single election cycle with directors who are unfamiliar with our business, strategic initiatives and the complexities of our industry. Complete director turnover would disrupt ongoing strategic planning, compromise institutional knowledge of key business decisions and undermine continuity in oversight of management.
32 | 2025 Proxy Statement | | ||||||
PROPOSAL FIVE n
Customer Confidence in Governance Stability
In making purchasing decisions, our customers have expressed concern about the potential takeover of Zscaler, which could result in a decrease in service levels and innovation. As a result, we believe that the customer confidence created by our anti-takeover protections, including our classified board, translates directly into revenue growth and stockholder value.
Orderly Board Refreshment
Our classified board promotes orderly board refreshment that balances continuity with fresh perspectives. New directors benefit from working alongside experienced board members with historical context and deep knowledge of our business, while contributing new insights and expertise. This measured approach to board composition supports consistent long-term strategic execution rather than the potential volatility of wholesale board changes. The classified structure also allows directors sufficient time to develop the expertise necessary to provide effective oversight of our global operations and navigate the evolving regulatory and competitive environment in which we operate.
Industry Alignment
Of our 21 peer companies listed in this Proxy Statement under "Executive Compensation—Compensation-Setting Process—Competitive Positioning," 16 have a classified board, representing more than 75% of our peer companies. This clear market practice among our peers underscores the broad recognition that a classified board supports long-term strategic oversight, continuity and stability for companies like Zscaler.
Stockholder Accountability
Our directors are accountable to stockholders. All directors owe a fiduciary duty to the Company and our stockholders, regardless of the length of their term. One third of our board is elected at each annual meeting. Before any director is nominated to stand for an additional term, the nominating and corporate governance committee and our board of directors carefully review the performance and contributions of that director. This ensures that directors are performing at a high level to stay on the board.
Our board of directors has carefully evaluated the proposal and, for the reasons described above, believes that the proposal is not in the best interests of our stockholders.
We will promptly provide our stockholders with the name, address, and, to our knowledge, the number of voting securities held by the stockholder who submitted the proposal upon receiving a written request sent to us by mail directed to:
Corporate Secretary
Zscaler, Inc.
120 Holger Way
San Jose, California 95134
Vote Required
The approval of the Board Declassification Proposal requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the voting power of the shares of our common stock present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote thereon. Abstentions will have the effect of a vote AGAINST the proposal. Broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of the vote.
 | The Board of Directors recommends a vote “AGAINST” the Board Declassification Proposal. | |||||||||||||
| 2025 Proxy Statement | 33 | ||||||
Executive Officers
The following table sets forth certain information about our executive officers and their respective ages as of November 1, 2025. Executive Officers are designated by the board of directors to hold office until their successors are elected and qualified.
| Name | Age | Position | ||||||
| Jay Chaudhry | 67 | Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board | ||||||
| Kevin Rubin | 51 | Chief Financial Officer | ||||||
| Adam Geller | 49 | Chief Product Officer | ||||||
| Raj Judge | 59 | Executive Vice President of Corporate Strategy and Director | ||||||
| Mike Rich | 58 | Chief Revenue Officer and President of Global Sales | ||||||
| Robert Schlossman | 57 | Chief Legal Officer and Secretary | ||||||
| Remo Canessa | 68 | Former Chief Financial Officer (retired effective June 2, 2025) | ||||||
Jay Chaudhry. For the biography of Mr. Chaudhry, see “Board of Directors and Corporate Governance—Continuing Directors.”
Kevin Rubin has served as our Chief Financial Officer since June 2025. Prior to joining us and from July 2024 to May 2025, Mr. Rubin served as chief financial officer of BetterUp, Inc. Prior to joining BetterUp Inc. and from April 2016, Mr. Rubin worked at Alteryx, Inc., serving as chief financial officer until March 2024, and as interim chief executive officer from January 2024 to March 2024. Mr. Rubin holds a B.A. in Business Economics from the University of California, Santa Barbara.
Adam Geller has served as our Chief Product Officer since September 2024. Prior to joining us, and from June 2020, he worked at Exabeam, serving as chief product officer from June 2020 to June 2024 and chief executive officer from June 2023 to July 2024. Mr. Geller holds a B.S. in Industrial and Labor Relations from Cornell University.
Raj Judge. For the biography of Mr. Judge, see “Board of Directors and Corporate Governance—Continuing Directors.”
Mike Rich has served as our Chief Revenue Officer and President of Global Sales since November 2023. Prior to joining us, and from June 2011, he served as President, Americas at ServiceNow. Mr. Rich holds a B.A. in Political Science from the University of California, Santa Barbara.
Robert Schlossman has served as our Chief Legal Officer and our Secretary since February 2016. Mr. Schlossman holds a J.D. from the University of California, Berkeley School of Law, as well as an M.A. and B.A. in English from Stanford University.
Remo Canessa served as our Chief Financial Officer from February 2017 to June 2025. Mr. Canessa is a certified public accountant (inactive), and he holds a B.A. in economics from the University of California, Berkeley and an M.B.A. from Santa Clara University.
34 | 2025 Proxy Statement | | ||||||
Executive Compensation
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
INTRODUCTION
This Compensation Discussion and Analysis provides information regarding the fiscal 2025 compensation program for our principal executive officer, our current principal financial officer, our former principal financial officer and our three other executive officers at fiscal year-end who were our most highly-compensated executive officers, or our Named Executive Officers. This section provides details about our executive compensation philosophy, objectives and design; how and why our compensation committee arrived at the specific compensation policies and decisions relating to fiscal 2025, which resulted in the compensation as set forth in the Summary Compensation Table and other compensation tables contained in this Proxy Statement.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
As has historically been the case when designing our compensation programs, in fiscal 2025, our compensation committee aimed to tie our Named Executive Officers’ compensation to key performance measures focusing on growth and capturing additional market share, while also incentivizing delivery of annual operating profitability. Specifically, in addition to a base salary, our Named Executive Officers’ target total direct compensation included annual short-term and long-term incentives that are based on our attainment of key business objectives focused on continued growth and profitability. For fiscal 2025, achievement of cash bonuses was determined based on performance metrics consisting of revenue, calculated billings and non-GAAP income from operations, as well as corporate and individual executive performance metrics and goals. Attainment of our performance-based equity awards issued in fiscal 2025 will be determined based on achievement of long-term, multi-year ARR growth targets.
We believe our “pay for performance” design is working, as fiscal 2025 was another year of strong growth and non-GAAP profitability for Zscaler. For the full year, our revenue grew 23% to $2.67 billion and billings grew 24% to over $3.25 billion. In fiscal 2025, we increased our ARR to over $3.0 billion, growing over 22% year-over-year and reaching an ARR milestone that only a select few SaaS companies have achieved. At the end of fiscal 2025, we served over 9,400 customers and protected over 50 million users.
In fiscal 2025, the key highlights of our executive compensation program included:
| Base Salaries and Bonus Targets | Bonuses Based on Performance | Performance Awards Based on Long-Term ARR Targets | CEO Compensation Heavily Weighted Towards Performance | ||||||||
| The compensation committee increased base salaries by a range of 0% to 4.4% and set bonus targets at similar rates as prior years — ranging from 75% to 100% of base salary. | The compensation committee set cash bonus funding based on achievement of annual revenue, calculated billings and non-GAAP income from operations targets, with 100% of the funded bonus amounts subject to downward discretion by our CEO. For the full year, Named Executive Officers received an aggregate of 100.9% of their target bonus amounts. As in prior fiscal years, our CEO did not participate in the Employee Incentive Compensation Plan. | The compensation committee used performance share unit, or PSU, performance metrics based on achievement of multi-year, long-term aggressive ARR targets. For continuing executives, PSU targets were set starting at approximately 160% of fiscal 2024 ARR. | Our CEO did not receive new equity awards. He was awarded a long-term equity incentive package in fiscal 2023, with 80% of his incentive compensation opportunity in the form of PSU awards and 20% in the form of RSUs. The award issued in fiscal 2023 was intended to cover a four-year period at the time it was granted. | ||||||||
| 2025 Proxy Statement | 35 | ||||||
n EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
For fiscal 2025, our Named Executive Officers were:
▪Jay Chaudhry, our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board, or our CEO;
▪Kevin Rubin, our Chief Financial Officer, or our CFO;
▪Adam Geller, our Chief Product Officer, or our CPO;
▪Raj Judge, our Executive Vice President of Corporate Strategy and Director;
▪Mike Rich, our Chief Revenue Officer and President of Global Sales, or our CRO; and
▪Remo E. Canessa, our former Chief Financial Officer.
EXECUTIVE TRANSITIONS
In fiscal 2025, the following executive officer transitions took place:
▪In September 2024, Mr. Geller joined the Company as our CPO.
▪In May 2025, Mr. Rubin joined the Company, succeeding Mr. Canessa as CFO effective on June 2, 2025.
▪In May 2025, Mr. Judge joined the Company as Executive Vice President of Corporate Strategy and joined the board of directors.
COMPENSATION PHILOSOPHY AND OBJECTIVES
We design our executive compensation program to achieve the following objectives, consistent with our “pay for performance” philosophy:
▪attract, motivate and retain executive officers of outstanding ability, potential and experience;
▪incentivize long-term, sustained performance;
▪motivate and reward behavior that results in exceeding our corporate performance objectives; and
▪appropriately reward strong performance, and meaningfully align our compensation programs with the creation of short- and long-term value for our stockholders.
We believe that our executive compensation programs should include short-term and long-term elements, which reward consistent performance that meets or exceeds expectations. We evaluate both performance and compensation to ensure that the compensation provided to our executive officers remains competitive relative to the compensation paid by similar companies operating in the technology industry, taking into account the role and performance of the individual executive officer and the performance and strategic objectives of the Company.
36 | 2025 Proxy Statement | | ||||||
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION n
Focus on Growth
We believe that organizations are still in the early stages of embracing cloud-based business solutions and adopting the security and networking solutions, including our products, that are necessary to secure and manage cloud-based operations. To be successful in this market, we believe that delivering growth and capturing market share are paramount, while prudently managing expenses as we invest in our business to deliver annual operating profitability. We focus our compensation programs on aggressive growth and profitability targets that we believe will deliver stockholder value in a highly competitive and emerging market.
The labor market remains extremely competitive for skilled executives, like ours, who have demonstrated the ability to dramatically scale a business, develop and sell new technology, oversee operation of one of the largest cloud platforms that process half a trillion transactions per day, disrupt legacy industries, produce strong financial results and deliver sustained value to stockholders. In order to retain our existing executives and recruit new leaders, the compensation committee believes that we must provide our executives with attractive compensation packages which provide a compelling incentive to join us and remain employed for an extended period of time.
Business Highlights
Our focus on growth and profitability in compensating and incentivizing our employees, including our executives, has succeeded in delivering both robust financial performance and also long-term value to our stockholders.
Fiscal 2025 Financial Performance
Fiscal 2025 was a strong year for us marked by significant achievement and growth across all of our key metrics. Fiscal 2025 highlights were as follows:
| Revenue Growth | Calculated Billings Growth* | Non-GAAP Income from Operations† | Growth in Large Customers | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
23% Y/Y | 24% Y/Y | 31% | 18% Y/Y | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| $2.67B Revenue | $3.25B Billings | $580.1M | +664 Enterprises (>$1M ARR) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
*Calculated billings is a non-GAAP financial measure that we believe is a key metric to measure our periodic performance. Calculated billings represents our total revenue plus the change in deferred revenue in a period. See Appendix A for the calculation of calculated billings.
†Non-GAAP income from operations is a financial measure that we believe is a key metric to measure our periodic performance. Non-GAAP income from operations represents GAAP loss from operations excluding stock-based compensation expense and related payroll taxes, amortization expense of acquired intangible assets, restructuring and other changes and acquisition-related expenses. See Appendix A for the calculation of non-GAAP income from operations.
| 2025 Proxy Statement | 37 | ||||||
n EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Long-Term Financial Performance
During the five-year period ending July 31, 2025, we achieved substantial growth across all of our key metrics:
| Revenue | Non-GAAP Income From Operations* | Stock Price | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 520% | 1420% | 120% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CAGR of 44% | CAGR of 72%† | CAGR of 17%† | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Revenue Increased from $431.3 million in fiscal 2020 to $2.67 billion in fiscal 2025, an increase of 520%. | Non-GAAP income from operations increased from $38.2 million in fiscal 2020 to $580.1 million in fiscal 2025, an increase of 1420%. | The closing market price of our common stock on July 31, 2025, the last trading day of fiscal 2025 was $285.56 per share. Comparatively, the price on the last trading day of fiscal 2020 was $129.85 per share. This reflects an increase of 120%. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
*Non-GAAP income from operations is a financial measure that we believe is a key metric to measure our periodic performance. Non-GAAP income from operations represents GAAP loss from operations excluding stock-based compensation expense and related payroll taxes, amortization expense of acquired intangible assets, restructuring and other changes and acquisition-related expenses. See Appendix A for the calculation of non-GAAP income from operations.
†The compound annual growth rate (CAGR) is the mean annual growth rate over a specified time period. We believe it is useful to investors to use a five-year CAGR, here shown from fiscals 2020 to 2025, to reflect underlying growth trends.
Pay-for-Performance
We believe our executive compensation program is reasonable, competitive and appropriately balances the goals of attracting, motivating, rewarding and retaining our executive officers, with the goal of aligning their interests with those of our stockholders. To ensure this alignment and to motivate and reward individual initiative and effort, a substantial portion of our executive officers’ target annual compensation opportunity is both variable in nature and “at-risk.”
We emphasize variable compensation that appropriately rewards our executive officers through two separate compensation elements:
▪First, we provide our executive officers (other than our CEO) the opportunity to participate in our cash bonus plan, which provides cash payments if they produce results that meet or exceed the financial, operational and strategic objectives for the fiscal year, as established by our compensation committee.
▪In addition, we grant RSU and PSU awards that will reward recipients over a multi-year period, with the PSU awards being earned only for achieving long-term aggressive performance objectives established by the compensation committee. The RSU awards and, if earned, PSU awards, comprise a majority of our executive officers’ target total direct compensation opportunities. The future value of these awards depends significantly on our performance and the value of our common stock, thereby incentivizing them to build sustainable long-term value for the benefit of our stockholders.
These variable pay elements ensure that, each year, a substantial portion of our executive officers’ target total direct compensation is contingent (rather than fixed) in nature, with the amounts ultimately payable subject to variability above or below target levels commensurate with our actual performance.
38 | 2025 Proxy Statement | | ||||||
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION n
Executive Compensation Policies and Practices
We endeavor to maintain sound governance standards consistent with our executive compensation policies and practices. The compensation committee evaluates our executive compensation program on a regular basis to ensure that it is consistent with our short-term and long-term goals given the dynamic nature of our business and the market in which we compete for executive talent.
The following summarizes our executive compensation and related policies and practices:
 | What We Do | |||||||
Maintain an Independent Compensation Committee The compensation committee consists solely of independent directors who establish our compensation policies and practices. | ||||||||
Retain an Independent Compensation Advisor The compensation committee has engaged its own compensation consultant to provide information, analysis and other advice on executive compensation independent of management. | ||||||||
At-Risk Compensation Our executive compensation program is designed so that a significant portion of our Named Executive Officers’ compensation is “at risk” based on corporate performance, as well as equity-based, to align the interests of our Named Executive Officers and stockholders. | ||||||||
Use Pay-for-Performance Philosophy Most of our Named Executive Officers’ compensation is directly linked to corporate performance and includes a significant long-term equity component, thereby making a substantial portion of each Named Executive Officer’s target total direct compensation dependent upon the long-term growth of our stock price. | ||||||||
Succession Planning We review the risks associated with our key executive officer positions to ensure adequate succession plans are in place. | ||||||||
Clawback Policy Our compensation committee is obligated to recover Excess Incentive Compensation received by covered executives under applicable circumstances. | ||||||||
Nominal Base Salary and Zero Cash Bonus for CEO Our CEO receives only a nominal base salary and is not eligible for a cash bonus. | ||||||||
 | What We Don't Do | |||||||
No Executive Retirement Plans We do not currently offer defined benefit pension plans or any non-qualified deferred compensation plans or arrangements to our Named Executive Officers other than the plans and arrangements that are available to all employees. Our Named Executive Officers are eligible to participate in our Section 401(k) retirement plan on the same basis as our other employees. | ||||||||
Limited Perquisites Perquisites or other personal benefits are not a material part of our compensation program for our Named Executive Officers. | ||||||||
No Excise Tax Payments on Future Post-Employment Compensation Arrangements We do not provide any excise tax reimbursement payments (including “gross-ups”) on payments or benefits contingent upon a change in control of the Company. | ||||||||
No Automatic Executive Compensation Increases We do not provide automatic increases in executive compensation on an annual basis. Our compensation committee conducts an annual review and approval of our compensation strategy and risk profile to ensure that our compensation programs do not encourage excessive or inappropriate risk-taking. | ||||||||
No Hedging or Pledging of Our Equity Securities We prohibit our employees, including our Named Executive Officers and the members of our board of directors, from hedging or pledging our equity securities. | ||||||||
| 2025 Proxy Statement | 39 | ||||||
n EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Stockholder Advisory Vote on Named Executive Officer Compensation
At our 2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, we conducted our non-binding stockholder advisory vote on the compensation of our Named Executive Officers (commonly known as a “Say-on-Pay” vote). Approximately 93.1% of the votes cast were cast “FOR” the approval of our Named Executive Officer compensation for fiscal 2024, an increase of 21.5% over the prior year.
We value the opinions of our stockholders. Our board of directors and the compensation committee will continue to monitor stockholder opinions, including the outcome of future advisory votes on the compensation of our Named Executive Officers, as well as feedback received throughout the year, when making compensation decisions for our executives.
After considering the above results and feedback from our stockholders, and in consideration of our primary objective of driving growth and capturing market share, the compensation committee decided to retain the majority of its overall approach to executive compensation.
Frequency of Future Stockholder Advisory Vote on Named Executive Officer Compensation
At the Annual Meeting, we will be conducting a non-binding advisory vote on the frequency of future non-binding advisory votes on the compensation of our Named Executive Officers (commonly known as a "Say-When-on-Pay" vote). Our board of directors is recommending that we hold future non-binding advisory votes on the compensation of our Named Executive Officers on an annual, rather than a biennial or triennial, basis. For additional information about the Say-When-on-Pay vote, see Proposal No. 4 above.
COMPENSATION-SETTING PROCESS
Role of Compensation Committee
The compensation committee discharges the responsibilities of our board of directors relating to the compensation of our Named Executive Officers and our non-employee directors. The compensation committee has overall responsibility for overseeing our compensation and benefits policies generally, and overseeing and evaluating the compensation plans, policies and practices applicable to our CEO and other Named Executive Officers.
In carrying out its responsibilities, the compensation committee evaluates our compensation policies and practices with a focus on the degree to which these policies and practices reflect our executive compensation philosophy, develops strategies and makes decisions that it believes further our philosophy or align with developments in best compensation practices and reviews the performance of our Named Executive Officers when making decisions with respect to their compensation.
The compensation committee’s authority, duties and responsibilities are further described in its charter, which is reviewed annually and revised and updated as warranted. The charter is available at http://ir.zscaler.com in the Governance Documents section of our Investor Relations webpage.
The compensation committee retains a compensation consultant (as described below) to provide support in its review and assessment of our executive compensation program.
Setting Target Total Compensation
For continuing executives, the compensation committee reviews the base salary levels, annual cash bonus award opportunities and long-term incentive compensation opportunities of our Named Executive Officers and all related performance criteria at the beginning of each fiscal year, or more frequently as warranted. Adjustments to cash compensation are generally effective at the beginning of the fiscal year.
40 | 2025 Proxy Statement | | ||||||
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION n
For new executives, the compensation committee analyzes peer company executive compensation levels, market data for recently hired executives and the executive candidate's existing compensation. New hire compensation packages are designed to attract qualified executives, who often have large existing compensation arrangements, to join our leadership team, retain these executives after they have joined and, in certain cases, provide compensation, including equity compensation, to make these executives whole for compensation forfeited upon departure from prior employers.
The compensation committee utilizes a number of factors when formulating the target total direct compensation opportunities of our Named Executive Officers, including the following:
▪our executive compensation program objectives;
▪our performance against the financial, operational and strategic objectives established by the compensation committee and our board of directors;
▪each individual Named Executive Officer’s knowledge, skills, experience, qualifications and tenure relative to other similarly-situated executives at the companies in our compensation peer group and/or Compensia’s proprietary compensation database;
▪the scope of each Named Executive Officer’s role and responsibilities compared to other similarly-situated executives at the companies in our compensation peer group and/or Compensia’s proprietary compensation database;
▪the prior performance of each individual Named Executive Officer, based on a subjective assessment of his or her contributions to our overall performance, ability to lead his or her business unit or function and work as part of a team, all of which reflect our core values;
▪for new hires, the competitive market, taking into account annual compensation levels at our peer companies, the new executive’s qualifications and experience, as well as the compensation received by the executive at their prior employer;
▪the potential of each individual Named Executive Officer to contribute to our long-term financial, operational and strategic objectives;
▪our financial performance relative to our compensation and performance peers;
▪the compensation practices of our compensation peer group and/or the companies in Compensia’s proprietary compensation database and the positioning of each Named Executive Officer’s compensation in a ranking of peer company compensation levels based on an analysis of competitive market data; and
▪the recommendations of our CEO with respect to the compensation of our Named Executive Officers (except with respect to his own compensation).
These factors provide the framework for compensation decision-making and final decisions regarding the compensation opportunity for each Named Executive Officer.
Role of Management
In discharging its responsibilities, the compensation committee works with members of management, including our CEO. Management assists the compensation committee by providing information on corporate and individual performance, market compensation data and management’s perspective on compensation matters. The compensation committee solicits and reviews our CEO’s proposals with respect to program structures, as well as his recommendations for adjustments to annual cash compensation, long-term incentive compensation opportunities and other compensation-related matters for our Named Executive Officers (except with respect to his own compensation) based on his evaluation of their performance for the prior year.
| 2025 Proxy Statement | 41 | ||||||
n EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
At the beginning of each year, our CEO reviews the performance of our other Named Executive Officers based on each executive's level of success in accomplishing the business objectives established for him or her for the prior year and his or her overall performance during that year and then shares these evaluations with, and makes recommendations to, the compensation committee for each element of compensation as described above.
The compensation committee reviews and discusses our CEO’s proposals and recommendations with our CEO and considers them as one factor in determining and approving the compensation of our Named Executive Officers. Our CEO also attends meetings of our board of directors and the compensation committee at which executive compensation matters are addressed, except with respect to discussions involving his own compensation.
Role of Compensation Consultant
The compensation committee engaged Compensia as its external compensation consultant to assist it by providing information, analysis and other advice relating to our executive compensation program. The compensation consultant reports directly to the compensation committee and its chair and serves at the discretion of the compensation committee, which reviews the engagement annually.
During fiscal 2025, Compensia attended the meetings of the compensation committee (both with and without management present) as requested and provided the following services:
▪consultation with the compensation committee chair and other members between compensation committee meetings;
▪review, research and updating of our compensation peer group;
▪an analysis of competitive market data based on the compensation peer group and Compensia's proprietary compensation database for our Named Executive Officers’ positions and an evaluation of how the compensation we pay our Named Executive Officers compares both to our performance and to how the companies in our compensation peer group compensate their executives;
▪review and analysis of the base salary levels, target annual cash bonus opportunities and long-term incentive compensation opportunities of our Named Executive Officers;
▪review and analysis of the metrics used by the companies in our compensation peer group in their short-term incentive compensation plans;
▪assessment of executive compensation trends within our industry, and updating on corporate governance and regulatory issues and developments;
▪review and analysis of director compensation levels; and
▪support on other ad hoc matters throughout the year.
The terms of Compensia’s engagement includes reporting directly to the compensation committee chair. Compensia also coordinated with management for data collection and job matching for our Named Executive Officers. In fiscal 2025, Compensia did not provide any other services to us.
42 | 2025 Proxy Statement | | ||||||
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION n
The compensation committee has evaluated its relationship with Compensia to ensure that it believes that such firm is independent from management. This review process included a review of the services that Compensia provided, the quality of those services and the fees associated with the services provided during fiscal 2025. Based on this review, as well as consideration of the factors affecting independence set forth in Exchange Act Rule 10C-1(b)(4), Rule 5605(d)(3)(D) of the Nasdaq Marketplace Rules and such other factors as were deemed relevant under the circumstances, the compensation committee has determined that no conflict of interest was raised as a result of the work performed by Compensia and that Compensia is independent.
Competitive Positioning
For purposes of assessing our executive compensation against the competitive market, the compensation committee reviews and considers the compensation levels and practices of a select group of peer companies. This compensation peer group consists of technology companies that are similar to us in terms of revenue, market capitalization and industry focus. The competitive data drawn from this compensation peer group is only one of several factors that the compensation committee considers in making its decisions with respect to the compensation of our Named Executive Officers.
The compensation peer group for fiscal 2025 compensation decisions was determined in March 2024 and was comprised of publicly-traded technology companies against which we compete for executive talent, as well as, in some instances, business opportunities. In evaluating the companies comprising the compensation peer group, we worked with Compensia to establish the following criteria:
▪publicly-traded companies headquartered in the United States and traded on a major United States stock exchange with a preference for California-based companies;
▪companies in the application software and systems software industries;
▪similar revenues – within a range of ~0.5x to ~2.0x our then-current trailing four quarters revenue of approximately $1.8 billion (approximately $879 million to approximately $3.5 billion); and
▪similar market capitalization – within a range of ~0.33x to 3.0x our then-current 30-day average market capitalization of approximately $31.5 billion (approximately $10.5 billion to approximately $94.5 billion).
Our fiscal 2025 peer group consisted of the following companies:
| ANSYS | Dynatrace | Paycom Software | ||||||
| Arista Networks | Fortinet | Snowflake | ||||||
| Bill.com Holdings | HubSpot | The Trade Desk | ||||||
| Cloudflare | MongoDB | Twilio | ||||||
| CrowdStrike Holdings | Okta | Unity Software | ||||||
| Datadog | Palantir Technologies | Veeva Systems | ||||||
| DocuSign | Palo Alto Networks | Zoominfo Technologies | ||||||
The compensation committee reviews our compensation peer group at least annually and makes adjustments to its composition if warranted, taking into account changes in both our business and the businesses of the companies in the peer group.
| 2025 Proxy Statement | 43 | ||||||
n EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
COMPENSATION ELEMENTS
In fiscal 2025, the principal elements of our executive compensation program, and the purposes for each element, were as follows:
| Element | Type of Element | Compensation Element | Objective | ||||||||
| Base Salary | Fixed | Cash | Designed to attract and retain highly talented executives by providing fixed compensation amounts that are competitive in the market | ||||||||
| Annual Cash Bonuses | Variable | Cash | Designed to provide financial incentives to motivate our executives to achieve semi-annual financial objectives | ||||||||
| Long-Term Incentive Compensation | Variable | Equity awards in the form of PSU awards and RSU awards and occasionally option awards | Designed to align the interests of our executives and our stockholders by motivating them to create sustained long-term stockholder value | ||||||||
BASE SALARY
Base salary represents the fixed portion of the compensation of our Named Executive Officers and is an important element of compensation intended to attract and retain highly talented individuals. Generally, we use base salary to provide each Named Executive Officer with a specified level of cash compensation during the year with the expectation that he or she will perform his or her responsibilities to the best of his or her ability and in our best interests.
In November 2024, the compensation committee reviewed the base salaries of our continuing executive officers, including our Named Executive Officers, taking into consideration a competitive market analysis performed by its compensation consultant and the recommendations of our CEO (except with respect to his own base salary), as well as the other factors described in “Compensation-Setting Process—Setting Target Total Compensation” above. Following this review, the compensation committee determined to maintain the base salary of our CEO at its nominal fiscal 2024 level for fiscal 2025 and to increase the base salaries of our other continuing Named Executive Officers to levels that were more comparable to those of similarly-situated executives in the competitive marketplace. The base salary adjustments were effective August 1, 2024.
The base salaries of our Named Executive Officers for fiscal 2025 were as follows:
| Named Executive Officer | Fiscal 2025 Base Salary ($) | Fiscal 2024 Base Salary ($) | Percentage Adjustment | |||||||||||
| Mr. Chaudhry | 23,660 | 23,660 | 0 | % | ||||||||||
Mr. Rubin(1) | 470,000 | — | — | |||||||||||
Mr. Geller(1) | 450,000 | — | — | |||||||||||
Mr. Judge(1) | 425,000 | — | — | |||||||||||
| Mr. Rich | 470,000 | 450,000 | 4.4 | % | ||||||||||
| Mr. Canessa | 470,000 | 450,000 | 4.4 | % | ||||||||||
(1)In connection with their respective appointments, the base salaries for each of Messrs. Rubin, Geller and Judge were established as set forth in the table. Each base salary was pro-rated during fiscal 2025 to reflect their time of service at the Company.
44 | 2025 Proxy Statement | | ||||||
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION n
The base salaries actually paid to our Named Executive Officers during fiscal 2025 are set forth in the “Fiscal 2025 Summary Compensation Table” below.
ANNUAL CASH BONUSES
We use our Employee Incentive Compensation Plan, a cash bonus plan, to motivate employees selected by the compensation committee, including our Named Executive Officers (other than our CEO), to achieve our annual business goals. Pursuant to the Employee Incentive Compensation Plan, our compensation committee, in its sole discretion, establishes a target award for each executive and a bonus pool for our executives as a group, with actual awards payable from the bonus pool, with respect to the applicable performance period. For each period, our CEO may exercise discretion by evaluating multiple individual and corporate performance metrics, which may include sales performance and results, financial results, corporate objectives, customer satisfaction, product development performance, cloud reliability, bonus pool funding for non-executive employees, people management and development, governance and ethics, environmental objectives, social and individual executive goals, among other factors. For fiscal 2025, the Employee Incentive Compensation Plan included semi-annual award payouts after the end of the first six-months of the fiscal year (for the period from August 1, 2024 through January 31, 2025), and, then again, after the end of the fiscal year (for the period from February 1, 2025 through July 31, 2025).
Fiscal 2025 Target Annual Cash Bonus Award Opportunities
For purposes of the Employee Incentive Compensation Plan, cash bonus awards were based upon target annual cash bonus award opportunities as determined by the compensation committee. In November 2024, the compensation committee reviewed the target annual cash bonus award opportunities of our Named Executive Officers and determined to adjust the target annual cash bonus opportunities for each of our eligible Named Executive Officers to set their total target annual cash opportunity for fiscal 2025 at a level that was comparable to those of similarly-situated executives in the competitive marketplace. As in prior fiscal years, our CEO did not participate in the Employee Incentive Compensation Plan.
The target annual cash bonus award opportunities of our Named Executive Officers for fiscal 2025 were as follows:
| Named Executive Officer | Fiscal 2025 Target Annual Cash Bonus Award Opportunity ($) | Fiscal 2024 Target Annual Cash Bonus Award Opportunity ($) | Percentage Adjustment (%) | |||||||||||
| Mr. Chaudhry | — | — | — | |||||||||||
Mr. Rubin(1) | 470,000 | — | — | |||||||||||
Mr. Geller(1) | 450,000 | — | — | |||||||||||
Mr. Judge(1) | 318,750 | — | — | |||||||||||
| Mr. Rich | 470,000 | 450,000 | 4.4 | |||||||||||
| Mr. Canessa | 470,000 | 450,000 | 4.4 | |||||||||||
(1)In connection with their respective appointments, the bonus targets for each of Messrs. Rubin, Geller and Judge were established as set forth in the table. The payouts for Messrs. Rubin and Geller were pro-rated during fiscal 2025 to reflect their time of service at the Company.
Potential annual cash bonus awards for our Named Executive Officers under the Employee Incentive Compensation Plan could range from zero to 200% of their target annual cash bonus award opportunity. For the full year, eligible Named Executive Officers earned an aggregate of 100.9% of their target performance amounts.
The cash bonuses actually paid to our Named Executive Officers for fiscal 2025 are set forth in the “Fiscal 2025 Summary Compensation Table” below.
| 2025 Proxy Statement | 45 | ||||||
n EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Incentive Plan Performance Metrics
Under the Employee Incentive Compensation Plan, the compensation committee determined the performance metrics and related target levels for the fiscal 2025 annual cash bonus awards.
The compensation committee selected revenue, calculated billings and non-GAAP income from operations as the appropriate corporate performance metrics for the Named Executive Officers because, in its view, these metrics were key indicators of our periodic performance and our progress in executing on our business strategy of focusing on growth and gaining market share, while also prioritizing increased profitability as a maturing company.
For purposes of the Named Executive Officers’ cash bonus awards:
▪“Revenue” is total revenue calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP, as reported in our audited financial statements. This metric was chosen because it incentivizes revenue growth.
▪“Calculated billings” is our total revenue plus the change in deferred revenue in a given fiscal period. Calculated billings in any particular fiscal period aims to reflect amounts invoiced for subscriptions to access our cloud platform, together with related support services for our new and existing customers. This metric was chosen because it incentivizes calculated billings growth.
▪“Non-GAAP income from operations” is our GAAP loss from operations adjusted to exclude stock-based compensation expense and related employer payroll taxes, amortization expense of acquired intangible assets and restructuring and other charges. This metric was chosen because it incentivizes fiscal discipline and profitability.
As reflected in our annual operating plan presented to and approved by our board of directors, the target levels established for revenue, calculated billings and non-GAAP income from operations for the full year of fiscal 2025 by the compensation committee were as follows:
| Performance Metric | Weighting Target | Full Year Fiscal 2025 ($ million) | ||||||
| Revenue | 30% | 2,678,655 | ||||||
| Calculated billings | 30% | 3,273,200 | ||||||
| Non-GAAP income from operations | 40% | 573,247 | ||||||
For fiscal 2025, the targets for each of these financial metrics chosen for the Employee Incentive Compensation Plan represented increases ranging from approximately 20% to 50% over the prior year, reflecting very aggressive targets for fiscal 2025.
46 | 2025 Proxy Statement | | ||||||
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION n
The compensation committee determined that the bonus pool would fund, and our Named Executive Officers were eligible to earn, up to 200% of their target cash bonus awards, to the extent that the maximum achievement for each of revenue, calculated billings and non-GAAP income from operations for each performance period in fiscal 2025 was met. The following tables detail the metrics used to fund the cash bonuses paid to our Named Executive Officers, and their bonus attainment results:
Revenue and Calculated Billings
| Bonus Pool Funding Metrics | ||||||||
| Metric Achievement | Funded Amount | Bonus Attainment | ||||||
| Less than 90% | 0% | No payout below 90% achievement | ||||||
| 90% – 100% | 50% to 100% linear | 90% attainment pays 50% and 100% pays 100% | ||||||
| 100% –105% | 100% to 200% linear | 100% attainment pays 100% and 105% pays 200% | ||||||
Non-GAAP Income from Operations
| Bonus Pool Funding Metrics | ||||||||
| Metric Achievement | Funded Amount | Bonus Attainment | ||||||
| Less than 80% | 0% | No payout below 80% achievement | ||||||
| 80% – 100% | 50% to 100% linear | 80% attainment pays 50% and 100% pays 100% | ||||||
| 100% –120% | 100% to 200% linear | 100% attainment pays 100% and 120% pays 200% | ||||||
| Fiscal 25 Bonus Pool Achievement Results | |||||||||||
| Period/Metric | % Achievement | % Funded | Weighted Funded Attainment (% of Target) | ||||||||
| First Fiscal Half | 100.9 | ||||||||||
| Revenue | 99.9 | 99.5 | 29.9 | ||||||||
| Calculated billings | 99.1 | 95.5 | 28.7 | ||||||||
| Non-GAAP income from operations | 101.2 | 106.0 | 42.4 | ||||||||
| Second Fiscal Half | 100.9 | ||||||||||
| Revenue | 99.7 | 98.5 | 29.6 | ||||||||
| Calculated billings | 99.3 | 96.5 | 29.0 | ||||||||
| Non-GAAP income from operations | 101.2 | 106.1 | 42.4 | ||||||||
| 2025 Proxy Statement | 47 | ||||||
n EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Cash Bonus Payments
In March 2025 and September 2025, the compensation committee determined that cash bonus payments to our eligible Named Executive Officers were funded at 100.9% of their target semi-annual cash bonus for each half-year period based on the performance results displayed above. For fiscal 2025, this resulted in a full year bonus payment equal to 100.9% of each eligible Named Executive Officers' annual bonus target, as set forth in the following schedule:
| Named Executive Officer | Period | Target Bonus Opportunity ($) | Bonus Payment ($) | |||||||||||
| Mr. Rubin | First Half | — | — | |||||||||||
Second Half(1) | 89,264 | 90,067 | ||||||||||||
| Total | 89,264 | 90,067 | ||||||||||||
| Mr. Geller | First Half(1) | 151,630 | 152,995 | |||||||||||
| Second Half | 225,000 | 227,025 | ||||||||||||
| Total | 376,630 | 380,020 | ||||||||||||
| Mr. Judge | First Half | — | — | |||||||||||
| Second Half | 159,375 | 160,809 | ||||||||||||
| Total | 159,375 | 160,809 | ||||||||||||
| Mr. Rich | First Half | 235,000 | 237,116 | |||||||||||
| Second Half | 235,000 | 237,115 | ||||||||||||
| Total | 470,000 | 474,231 | ||||||||||||
| Mr. Canessa | First Half | 235,000 | 237,116 | |||||||||||
Second Half(2) | 235,000 | 237,115 | ||||||||||||
| Total | 470,000 | 474,231 | ||||||||||||
(1)The cash bonus award payout for each of Messrs. Rubin and Geller was pro-rated for the half-year period during which they were hired.
(2)Mr. Canessa's second half bonus was paid at 100% of attainment.
LONG-TERM INCENTIVE COMPENSATION
We view long-term incentive compensation in the form of equity awards as a critical element of our executive compensation program. We use equity awards to incentivize and reward our Named Executive Officers for long-term corporate performance based on the value of our common stock and, thereby, to align the interests of our Named Executive Officers with those of our stockholders. In fiscal 2025, equity awards were granted to the Named Executive Officers that included both time-based and performance-based stock awards.
The compensation committee determined the amount of long-term incentive compensation for our Named Executive Officers as part of its annual compensation review. In making these awards and recommendation, the compensation committee took the following factors into consideration:
▪a competitive market analysis performed by Compensia;
▪the amount of equity compensation held by the Named Executive Officer (including the current economic value of his or her unvested equity and the ability of these unvested holdings to satisfy our retention objectives);
▪the recommendations of our CEO (except with respect to his own equity awards);
48 | 2025 Proxy Statement | | ||||||
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION n
▪the projected impact of the proposed awards on our earnings and stock-based compensation as a percentage of revenue;
▪the proportion of our total shares outstanding used for annual employee long-term incentive compensation awards, or our burn rate, in relation to the companies in our compensation peer group; and
▪the potential dilution to our shareholders, or our overhang, in relation to the companies in our compensation peer group.
Performance Equity Award Philosophy
After considering analysis performed by Compensia, feedback from our stockholders and the compensation committee’s desire to establish long-term performance metrics, the compensation committee determined that PSU performance metrics would be based on achievement of long-term, multi-year ARR metrics. Since we believe staggered ARR targets incentivize our executives to drive continued ARR growth, the compensation committee has approved performance metrics that create a ladder with multiple ARR targets over time. We use aggressive multiples of the preceding fiscal year’s ARR to determine our PSU award ARR targets, with such multiples determined based on target growth rates. The PSU awards are also designed to incentivize executives to achieve rigorous timelines for meeting the ARR targets by providing for over-achievement based on meeting early or exceeding the PSU award ARR targets. To balance the aggressive nature of such targets, these awards provide for extended attainment timelines. We believe that this feature of the PSU awards will provide continued incentive to keep working towards the next milestone. Later achievement of the ARR targets will naturally decrease the value of the PSU awards because they will be earned over a longer than intended time period and the Company’s growth rate will be lower than if the ARR target was achieved sooner.
The compensation committee believes this philosophy underscores our commitment to aggressively pursue and incentivize long-term future growth and to establish material stockholder value alignment.
Fiscal 2025 Annual Equity Awards to Continuing NEO
In fiscal 2025, we issued annual long-term incentive compensation awards in the form of PSU awards and time-based RSU awards to Mr. Rich, the only continuing Named Executive Officer to receive an award. Mr. Chaudhry did not receive new equity awards because, in fiscal 2023, he was awarded a long-term equity incentive package intended to cover a four year period at the time it was granted.
Fiscal 2025 Equity Awards to New Hire NEOs
The offer letters provided to Messrs. Rubin, Geller and Judge included new hire RSU and PSU awards to incentivize each executive to join our executive leadership team and to compensate them for awards or compensation forfeited in departing his respective prior employer, as applicable. The form and amount of these non-recurring awards were determined by the compensation committee's thorough consideration of each executive's skills and experience, potential contributions to the Company, market compensation for similar roles provided by peer companies, the executive's competitive opportunities and the executive's compensation at his prior employer.
In September 2024, upon his appointment as CPO, Mr. Geller received (i) an RSU award with a value of $9,000,000 to acquire shares of our common stock that will vest over approximately a four-year period, (ii) a PSU award with a value of $9,000,000 to acquire shares of our common stock subject to certain performance criteria and (iii) a stock option to purchase 50,000 shares of common stock. For a description of these awards and the specific performance metrics, please see "Employment Offer Letter with Mr. Geller."
In May 2025, upon his appointment as CFO, Mr. Rubin received (i) an RSU award with a value of $12,600,000 to acquire shares of our common stock that will vest over approximately a four-year period, (ii) a PSU award with a value of $5,400,000 to acquire shares of our common stock subject to certain performance criteria and (iii) a stock option to purchase 50,000 shares of common stock. For a description of these awards and the specific performance metrics, please see "Employment Offer Letter with Mr. Rubin."
| 2025 Proxy Statement | 49 | ||||||
n EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
In May 2025, upon his appointment as Executive Vice President of Corporate Strategy, Mr. Judge received (i) an RSU award with a value of $2,000,000 to acquire shares of our common stock that will vest over a one-year period, (ii) an RSU award with a value of $13,500,000 to acquire shares of our common stock that will vest over approximately a four-year period and (iii) a PSU award with a value of $1,500,000 to acquire shares of our common stock subject to certain performance criteria. For a description of these awards and the specific performance metrics, please see "Employment Offer Letter with Mr. Judge."
The total equity awards approved for our Named Executive Officers, other than our CEO, in fiscal 2025 were as follows:
| Named Executive Officers | Restricted Stock Unit Award (Number of shares) (#) | Performance Stock Unit Award (Number of shares) (#) | Options to Purchase Common Stock (Number of shares) (#) | |||||||||||
| Mr. Rubin | 51,383 | 21,665 | 50,000 | |||||||||||
| Mr. Geller | 53,362 | 53,362 | 50,000 | |||||||||||
| Mr. Judge | 77,096 | 6,018 | — | |||||||||||
| Mr. Rich | 16,428 | 16,428 | — | |||||||||||
Fiscal 2025 Time-Based Equity Awards
In November 2024, Mr. Rich was issued RSUs for shares of our common stock that vest over a four-year period in 16 equal quarterly installments beginning on March 15, 2025.
Fiscal 2025 PSU Awards
As described above, ARR targets for PSU awards are based upon the achievement of aggressive long-term multi-year metrics. For PSU awards granted to Mr. Rich as a continuing executive, the compensation committee set three separate ARR targets at $4 billion, $5 billion and $6 billion. For the new hire PSU awards granted to Mr. Geller and Mr. Judge, the compensation committee set the ARR targets at $3 billion, $4 billion and $5 billion. For the new hire PSU awards granted to Mr. Rubin, the compensation committee set the ARR targets at $4 billion and $5 billion. The fiscal 2025 awards have the potential to earn up to 200% of the target award amounts for over achievement, based on performance ranging between 100% to 125% of target, depending on the award, with such performance determined as of a specific measurement date. If not achieved by the applicable measurement date, the awards will be earned at 100% of the target award amounts upon certification by the compensation committee after completion of the quarter in which the Company meets or exceeds the required PSU award ARR target. For the new hire PSU awards to Mr. Rubin, he will be eligible to receive at minimum 50% of the target PSUs for achievement of minimum ARR targets as of the applicable measurement date. All PSU awards will fully vest following certification, subject to each recipient's continued service to the Company.
50 | 2025 Proxy Statement | | ||||||
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION n
Fiscal 2025 PSU Award Achievement
In September 2025, the Compensation Committee reviewed the performance and certified the achievement for various ARR-based PSU awards for certain Named Executive Officers. Mr. Rich held an award with a measurement date of January 31, 2025, and Messrs. Geller and Judge each held an award with a measurement date of July 31, 2025. Mr. Rich's award was earned at 100% of target and the awards to Messrs. Geller and Judge were earned at 103% of target. Following certification of achievement, effective September 15, 2025, each recipient received the following number of shares:
| Named Executive Officers | Performance Stock Units Achieved (Number of shares) (#) | |||||||
| Mr. Rich | 14,337 | |||||||
| Mr. Geller | 17,322 | |||||||
| Mr. Judge | 2,067 | |||||||
Legacy CEO Equity Awards
No equity awards were granted to our CEO in fiscal 2025, and no grants are anticipated to be made in fiscal 2026, because in fiscal 2023, the CEO’s performance award was sized to cover a multi-year period. The performance award target for the fiscal 2023 CEO performance award was set at $5 billion in ARR, which was a 3.4x multiple of the Company's $1.46 billion in ARR at the time of grant, representing a very aggressive long term ARR target.
Health and Welfare Benefits
Our Named Executive Officers are eligible to receive the same employee benefits that are generally available to all employees, subject to the satisfaction of certain eligibility requirements. These benefits include medical, dental and vision insurance, business travel insurance, an employee assistance program, health and dependent care flexible spending accounts, basic life insurance, accidental death and dismemberment insurance, short-term and long-term disability insurance and reimbursement for mobile phone coverage. In fiscal 2025, we also offered our Named Executive Officers concierge health services and cybersecurity protection benefits.
We maintain a tax-qualified retirement plan, or the 401(k) Plan, that provides eligible employees, including our Named Executive Officers, with an opportunity to save for retirement on a tax-advantaged basis. Eligible employees are able to participate in the 401(k) Plan as of the first day of the month following the date they meet the plan’s eligibility requirements, and participants are able to defer up to 100% of their eligible compensation subject to applicable annual limits as set under the Internal Revenue Code. All participants’ interests in their deferrals are 100% vested when contributed. We also make employer matching contributions to the 401(k) Plan in an amount of up to $5,000 annually on a dollar for dollar basis.
The 401(k) Plan is intended to be qualified under Section 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code with the plan’s related trust intended to be tax-exempt under Section 501(a) of the Internal Revenue Code. As a tax-qualified retirement plan, contributions to our 401(k) Plan and earnings on those contributions are not taxable to our employees until distributed from the plan.
We design our employee benefits programs to be affordable and competitive in relation to the market as well as compliant with applicable laws and practices. We adjust our employee benefits programs as needed based upon regular monitoring of applicable laws and practices and the competitive market.
| 2025 Proxy Statement | 51 | ||||||
n EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Perquisites and Other Personal Benefits
Currently, we do not view perquisites or other personal benefits as a significant component of our executive compensation program. Accordingly, we do not provide significant perquisites or other personal benefits to our Named Executive Officers, except as generally made available to our employees or in situations where we believe it is appropriate to assist an individual in the performance of his or her duties, to make him or her more efficient and effective and for recruitment and retention purposes.
We have in the past and may in the future, provide perquisites or other personal benefits in limited circumstances, such as those described in the above section. All future practices with respect to perquisites or other personal benefits will be approved and subject to periodic review by the compensation committee.
EMPLOYMENT ARRANGEMENTS
We entered into a written employment agreement with our CEO and employment offer letters with our other Named Executive Officers in connection with their employment with us. We believe that these arrangements were necessary to induce these individuals to forego other employment opportunities or leave their then-current employer for the uncertainty of a demanding position in a new and unfamiliar organization.
In filling each of our executive positions, our board of directors or the compensation committee, as applicable, recognized that it would need to develop competitive compensation packages to attract qualified candidates in a dynamic labor market. At the same time, our board of directors and the compensation committee were sensitive to the need to integrate new executive officers into the executive compensation structure that we were seeking to develop, balancing both competitive and internal equity considerations.
Each of these arrangements provides for “at will” employment (meaning that either we or the executive may terminate the employment relationship at any time without cause) and sets forth the initial compensation arrangements for the executive, including their base salary, target annual cash bonus award opportunity (expressed as fixed amount or as a percentage of his or her base salary), participation in our employee benefit programs, eligibility for future equity awards and reimbursement for all reasonable and necessary business expenses.
In addition, in the case of our Named Executive Officers, their employment offer letters and other agreements provide that the executive will be eligible to receive certain severance payments and benefits in connection with certain terminations of employment. These post-employment compensation arrangements are discussed in “Post-Employment Compensation” below.
Employment Offer Letter with Mr. Rubin
In connection with his appointment as CFO, we entered into an employment offer letter with Mr. Rubin, or the Rubin Offer Letter. Pursuant to the Rubin Offer Letter, our initial compensation arrangements with Mr. Rubin were as follows:
▪an initial annual base salary of $470,000;
▪a target annual cash bonus award opportunity equal to $470,000;
▪an RSU award with a value of $12,600,000 to acquire shares of our common stock that will vest over approximately a four-year period, with 12.5% vesting on the first Quarterly Vesting Date following his six-month work anniversary and 6.25% vesting on each quarterly vesting date thereafter. The value was to be converted into shares based on the average closing price of our common stock for each of the trading days in May 2025;
▪PSU awards with an aggregate value of $5,400,000 to acquire shares of our common stock subject to performance criteria that are substantially consistent with the performance criteria applicable to the PSU awards granted to our other executive officers in fiscal 2025. The value was to be converted into shares based on the trailing 20-day trading average of stock preceding and ending on the date of approval of each award, rounded up to the nearest whole share;
52 | 2025 Proxy Statement | | ||||||
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION n
▪an option to purchase 50,000 shares of our common stock that will vest over a four-year period from his employment start date; and
▪relocation support including a cash allowance of $25,000 and temporary accommodations for up to 60 days.
Mr. Rubin was designated as a participant in our Severance Policy (as defined below), under which he is eligible to receive certain severance payments and benefits as described in the policy and as set forth below. The Rubin Offer Letter was negotiated in fiscal 2025 on our behalf by our CEO and approved by the compensation committee.
To receive the severance benefits upon a qualifying termination, Mr. Rubin must sign and not revoke a release of claims within the time specified in his employment offer letter.
Employment Offer Letter with Mr. Geller
In connection with his appointment as CPO, we entered into an employment offer letter with Mr. Geller, or the Geller Offer Letter. Pursuant to the Geller Offer Letter, our initial compensation arrangements with Mr. Geller were as follows:
▪an initial annual base salary of $450,000;
▪a target annual cash bonus award opportunity equal to $450,000;
▪an RSU award with a value of $9,000,000 to acquire shares of our common stock that will vest over approximately a four-year period, with 12.5% vesting on the first Quarterly Vesting Date following his six-month work anniversary and 6.25% vesting on each quarterly vesting date thereafter. The value was to be converted into shares based on the average closing price of our common stock for each of the trading days in September 2024;
▪PSU awards with an aggregate value of $9,000,000 to acquire shares of our common stock subject to performance criteria that are substantially consistent with the performance criteria applicable to the PSU awards granted to our other executive officers in fiscal 2025. The value was to be converted into shares based on the average closing price of our common stock for each of the trading days in September 2024; and
▪an option to purchase 50,000 shares of our common stock that will vest over a four-year period from his employment start date.
Mr. Geller was designated as a participant in our Severance Policy under which he is eligible to receive certain severance payments and benefits as described in the policy and as set forth below. The Geller Offer Letter was negotiated in fiscal 2025 on our behalf by our CEO and approved by the compensation committee.
To receive the severance benefits upon a qualifying termination, Mr. Geller must sign and not revoke a release of claims within the time specified in his employment offer letter.
Employment Offer Letter with Mr. Judge
In connection with his appointment as Executive Vice President of Corporate Strategy, we entered into an employment offer letter with Mr. Judge, or the Judge Offer Letter. Pursuant to the Judge Offer Letter, our initial compensation arrangements with Mr. Judge were as follows:
▪an initial annual base salary of $425,000;
▪a target annual cash bonus award opportunity equal to $318,750;
| 2025 Proxy Statement | 53 | ||||||
n EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
▪an RSU award with a value of $13,500,000 to acquire shares of our common stock that will vest over approximately a four-year period, with 6.25% vesting on June 15, 2025 and 6.25% vesting on each quarterly vesting date thereafter. The value was to be converted into shares based on the average closing price of our common stock for each of the trading days in May;
▪an RSU award with a value of $2,000,000 to acquire shares of our common stock that will vest over a one-year period, with 25% vesting on June 15, 2025, and 25% vesting on each quarterly vesting date thereafter. The value was to be converted into shares based on the average closing price of our common stock for each of the trading days in May; and
▪PSU awards with an aggregate value of $1,500,000 to acquire shares of our common stock subject to performance criteria that are substantially consistent with the performance criteria applicable to the PSU awards granted to our other executive officers in fiscal 2025. The value was to be converted into shares based on the trailing 20-day trading average of stock preceding and ending on the date of approval of each award, rounded up to the nearest whole share.
Mr. Judge was designated as a participant in our Severance Policy under which he is eligible to receive certain severance payments and benefits as described in the policy and as set forth below. The Judge Offer Letter was negotiated in fiscal 2025 on our behalf by our CEO and approved by the compensation committee.
To receive the severance benefits upon a qualifying termination, Mr. Judge must sign and not revoke a release of claims within the time specified in his employment offer letter.
Employment Offer Letter with Mr. Rich
In connection with his appointment as CRO, we entered into an employment offer letter with Mr. Rich, or the Rich Offer Letter. Pursuant to the Rich Offer Letter, our initial compensation arrangements with Mr. Rich were as follows:
▪an initial annual base salary of $450,000;
▪a target annual cash bonus award opportunity equal to $450,000;
▪a one-time start on bonus of $550,000;
▪a RSU award with a value of $21,200,000, broken into two separate grants to acquire shares of our common stock, $18,200,000 of which will vest over approximately a four-year period, and $3,000,000 of which will vest over approximately a two-year period. The value was to be converted into shares based on the average of the closing price of our common stock for each of the trading days in November 2023;
▪PSUs award with a value of $7,800,000 to acquire shares of our common stock subject to performance criteria that are substantially consistent with the performance applicable to the PSU awards granted to our other senior officers in fiscal 2024. The value was to be converted into shares based on the average of the closing price of our common stock for each of the trading days in November 2023; and
▪an option to purchase 50,000 shares of our common stock that will vest over a four-year period from his employment date.
Mr. Rich was designated as a participant in our Severance Policy under which he is eligible to receive certain severance payments and benefits in the event of his Qualifying Termination (as described below). To receive the severance benefits upon a qualifying termination, Mr. Rich must sign and not revoke a release of claims within the time specified in his employment offer letter.
54 | 2025 Proxy Statement | | ||||||
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION n
Transition Agreement with Mr. Canessa
In connection with his retirement, we entered into a transition agreement with Mr. Canessa dated June 9, 2025. The goal of this transition agreement was to ensure a smooth, uninterrupted transition for the Company between Mr. Canessa and an incoming CFO, ensuring that the Company maintained financial leadership continuity and could complete critical financial processes and meet reporting obligations. The Board believes that the transition agreement was in stockholders' best interests and facilitated an orderly leadership transition.
In this transition agreement, we agreed to provide continued employment during a transition period and Mr. Canessa agreed to continue in his chief financial officer role until a successor was appointed and thereafter transition to an advisory role through December 31, 2025. Under the transition agreement Mr. Canessa:
▪received a one-time lump sum payment of $750,000;
▪continues to receive his current regular base salary at the same level as prior to the transition period;
▪received a bonus for the second half of fiscal 2025;
▪continues vesting under applicable equity plans through the end of the transition period; and
▪remains eligible to participate in then-available company benefit plans at the same level as prior to the transition period.
POST-EMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION
The employment offer letters and equity award agreements with our Named Executive Officers provide them with certain protection in the event of their termination of employment other than for “cause,” death or “disability” (as such terms are defined in the employment offer letters). In addition, our Named Executive Officers are participants in our Change of Control and Severance Policy, or the Severance Policy, which provides for certain protections in the event of a termination of employment, depending on the circumstances and timing of the qualifying termination. We believe that these protections were necessary to induce these individuals to leave their former employment for the uncertainty of a demanding position in a new and unfamiliar organization. We also believe that these arrangements help to retain their services on an ongoing basis and to maintain the continued focus and dedication of our Named Executive Officers if there is a potential transaction that could involve a change in control of the Company to maximize stockholder value.
These arrangements provide reasonable compensation to a Named Executive Officer if he or she leaves our employ under certain circumstances and facilitates his or her transition to new employment. Further, in some instances we seek to mitigate any potential employer liability and avoid future disputes or litigation by conditioning post-employment compensation and benefits on a departing Named Executive Officer signing a separation and release agreement acceptable to us.
If a Named Executive Officer is terminated other than for "cause," "death" or "disability outside of a the period beginning on a "change in control" (as such terms are defined in the Severance Policy) and ending 12 months following the change of control (which we refer to as the change of control period), such Named Executive Officer will be able to receive the following post-employment compensation:
▪accelerated vesting of time-based awards such that each time-based award will immediately vest as to the number of then-unvested shares that would have vested as of the date that is six-months following the date of termination; and
▪a payment equal to 50% of the participant's base salary as of the date of termination, payable pursuant to the Company’s standard payroll procedures over a period of six months.
| 2025 Proxy Statement | 55 | ||||||
n EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
If the Named Executive Officer is terminated other than for "cause," "death" or "disability, or the Named Executive Officer resigns "for good reason" during the change of control period, such Named Executive Officer will receive the following benefits:
▪100% of the then-unvested shares subject to the participant's then-outstanding equity awards will become vested and exercisable, and in the case of equity awards with performance-based vesting, all performance goals and other vesting criteria will be deemed achieved at the applicable percentage of target levels set forth in the individual performance award agreement;
▪a lump-sum payment equal to 100% of the greatest of (i) a participant's annual base salary as in effect immediately prior to his termination, (ii) if the termination is a resignation for good reason based on a material reduction in base salary, a participant's annual base salary as in effect immediately prior to such reduction or (iii) a participant's annual base salary as in effect immediately prior to the change of control;
▪a lump-sum payment equal to (i) 100% of a participant's target annual bonus award opportunity for the fiscal year in which the termination occurs plus (ii) a pro-rated portion of such target annual bonus award opportunity reduced by any bonus payments made during such fiscal year;
▪the post-termination exercise period for any outstanding vested but unexercised stock option will be extended to the date that is 12 months after the termination date; and
▪a lump-sum health benefit severance payment of $36,000.
Under the Severance Policy, all payments and benefits in the event of a change in control of the Company are payable only if there is a subsequent loss of employment by a Named Executive Officer (a so-called “double-trigger” arrangement). In the case of the acceleration of vesting of outstanding equity awards, we use this double-trigger arrangement to protect against the loss of retention value following a change in control of the Company and to avoid windfalls, both of which could occur if vesting of either equity or cash-based awards accelerated automatically as a result of the transaction.
In the event of a change in control of the Company, to the extent Section 280G or 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code is applicable to a Named Executive Officer, such individual is entitled to receive either:
▪payment of the full amounts specified in the policy to which he or she is entitled; or
▪payment of such lesser amount that does not trigger the excise tax imposed by Section 4999, whichever results in him or her receiving a higher amount after taking into account all federal, state, and local income, excise and employment taxes.
We do not use excise tax payments (or “gross-ups”) relating to a change in control of the Company and have no such obligations in place with respect to any of our Named Executive Officers.
We believe that having in place reasonable and competitive post-employment compensation arrangements, including in the event of a change in control of the Company, are essential to attracting and retaining highly-qualified executive officers. The compensation committee does not consider the specific amounts payable under the post-employment compensation arrangements when determining the annual compensation for our Named Executive Officers. We do believe, however, that these arrangements are necessary to offer compensation packages that are competitive.
For detailed descriptions of the post-employment compensation arrangements with our Named Executive Officers, as well as an estimate of the potential payments and benefits payable under these arrangements, see “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control” below.
56 | 2025 Proxy Statement | | ||||||
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION n
EXECUTIVE STOCK OWNERSHIP GUIDELINES
We believe that our executives should hold a significant amount of Company equity to link their long-term economic interests directly to those of our stockholders. Accordingly, effective January 1, 2022, our board of directors adopted stock ownership guidelines for Named Executive Officers. Our chief executive officer is required to own shares of our common stock with a value equal to at least five times his or her annual base salary, and each other Named Executive Officer is required to own shares of our common stock with a value equal to at least three times his or her annual base salary.
We believe that this multiple constitutes significant amounts for our Named Executive Officers and provides a substantial link between the interests of our Named Executive Officers and those of our stockholders. Compliance with these guidelines for our Named Executive Officers is required within five years of becoming subject to them. For purposes of meeting the ownership requirements, unvested RSU awards are counted, but unearned performance awards and unexercised stock options are not. At the end of fiscal 2025, each of our Named Executive Officers exceeded these guidelines based on their current stock accumulation.
OTHER COMPENSATION POLICIES
Hedging and Pledging Prohibitions
Under our Insider Trading Policy , our employees (including officers) and members of our board of directors are prohibited from making short-sales and engaging in transactions in publicly-traded options, such as puts and calls, and other derivative securities with respect to our securities. This latter prohibition extends to any hedging or similar transaction designed to decrease the risks associated with holding our securities. In addition, under our Insider Trading Policy, our employees and members of our board of directors are prohibited from using our securities as collateral for a loan or holding our securities in a margin account.
Compensation Recovery ("Clawback") Policy
In fiscal 2023, our compensation committee adopted a Compensation Recovery Policy applicable to our CEO and all of our current and former Named Executive Officers (each a "Covered Person"). Under this policy, our compensation committee is obligated to recover Excess Incentive Compensation (as defined below) received by any Covered Person on or after October 2, 2023, if any, in the event Zscaler is required to prepare an accounting restatement due to material noncompliance with any financial reporting requirement under the securities laws. For purposes of this policy, Excess Incentive Compensation means the amount of certain incentive based compensation actually received by the Covered Person, minus the amount of such incentive based compensation that otherwise would have been received had the incentive compensation been determined based on the applicable restated amounts.
This Policy is intended to comply with, and will be interpreted in a manner consistent with, Section 10D of the Exchange Act, Exchange Act Rule 10D-1 and the Nasdaq listing standards.
Policies and Practices Related to the Timing of Option Awards
While we do not have a formal written policy in place with regard to the timing of awards of options in relation to the disclosure of material nonpublic information, the compensation committee does not seek to time equity grants to take advantage of information, either positive or negative, about our company that has not been publicly disclosed. It has been our recent practice to grant most of our equity awards in the form of RSUs.
TAX AND ACCOUNTING CONSIDERATIONS
The compensation committee takes the applicable tax and accounting requirements into consideration in designing and overseeing our executive compensation program.
| 2025 Proxy Statement | 57 | ||||||
n EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Deductibility of Executive Compensation
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code generally places a $1 million limit on the amount of compensation a public company can deduct in any one year for certain specified executive officers. While our compensation committee considers tax deductibility as one factor in determining executive compensation, our compensation committee also looks at other factors in making its decisions, as noted above, and retains the flexibility to award compensation that it determines to be consistent with the goals of our executive compensation program even if the awards are not deductible by us for tax purposes.
Taxation of “Parachute” Payments
Sections 280G and 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code provide that executive officers and directors who hold significant equity interests and certain other service providers may be subject to significant additional taxes if they receive payments or benefits in connection with a change in control of the Company that exceeds certain prescribed limits, and that the Company (or a successor) may forfeit a deduction on the amounts subject to this additional tax. We have not agreed to provide any executive officer, including any Named Executive Officer, with a “gross-up” or other reimbursement payment for any tax liability that the executive officer might owe as a result of the application of Sections 280G or 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code.
Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code
Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code imposes additional significant taxes in the event that an executive officer, director or service provider receives “deferred compensation” that does not satisfy the requirements of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code. Although we do not maintain a traditional nonqualified deferred compensation plan for our executive officers, Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code does apply to certain severance arrangements, bonus arrangements and equity awards, and we have structured all such arrangements and awards in a manner to either avoid or comply with the applicable requirements of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code.
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation
The compensation committee takes accounting considerations into account in designing compensation plans and arrangements for our executive officers and other employees. Chief among these is Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, or ASC Topic 718, the standard which governs the accounting treatment of certain stock-based compensation. Among other things, ASC Topic 718 requires us to record a compensation expense in our income statement for all equity awards granted to our executive officers and other employees. This compensation expense is based on the grant date “fair value” of the equity award and, in most cases, will be recognized ratably over the award’s requisite service period (which, generally, will correspond to the award’s vesting schedule). This compensation expense is also reported in the compensation tables below, even though recipients may never realize any value from their equity awards.
Amended and Restated Change of Control and Severance Policy
Our board of directors adopted a Change of Control and Severance Policy, or the Severance Policy, which was amended and restated in fiscal 2025. Each of our current executive officers is a participant in the Severance Policy. The Severance Policy provides two tiers of severance benefits depending on the circumstances and timing of the qualifying termination.
58 | 2025 Proxy Statement | | ||||||
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION n
Non-Change of Control Qualified Termination Benefits
If we terminate a participant other than for "cause," "death" or "disability" outside of a change of control period, such Named Executive Officer will be eligible to receive the following severance benefits:
▪accelerated vesting of time-based awards such that each time-based award will immediately vest as to the number of then-unvested shares that would have vested as of the date that is six-months following the date of termination; and
▪a payment equal to 50% of the participant's base salary as of the date of termination, payable pursuant to the Company’s standard payroll procedures over a period of six months.
Change of Control of Qualified Termination Benefits
If we terminate a participant other than for “cause,” death or “disability” or the Named Executive Officer resigns for “good reason” during the period beginning on a “change of control” (as such terms are defined in the Severance Policy) and ending 12 months following the change of control (which we refer to as the change of control period), such Named Executive Officer will be eligible to receive the following severance benefits:
▪100% of the then-unvested shares subject to the participant's then-outstanding equity awards will become vested and exercisable, and in the case of equity awards with performance-based vesting, all performance goals and other vesting criteria will be deemed achieved at the applicable percentage of target levels set forth in the individual performance award agreement;
▪a lump-sum payment equal to 100% of the greatest of (i) a participant's annual base salary as in effect immediately prior to his termination, (ii) if the termination is a resignation for good reason based on a material reduction in base salary, a participant's annual base salary as in effect immediately prior to such reduction or (iii) a participant's annual base salary as in effect immediately prior to the change of control;
▪a lump-sum payment equal to (i) 100% of a participant's target annual bonus award opportunity for the fiscal year in which the termination occurs plus (ii) a pro-rated portion of such target annual bonus award opportunity reduced by any bonus payments made during such fiscal year;
▪the post-termination exercise period for any outstanding vested but unexercised stock option will be extended to the date that is 12 months after the termination date; and
▪a lump-sum health benefit severance payment of $36,000.
To receive the severance benefits upon a qualifying termination, a Named Executive Officer must sign and not revoke a release of claims within the time specified in the Severance Policy. If we discover, after a Named Executive Officer receives severance payments or benefits, that grounds for terminating him for cause existed, such Named Executive Officer will not receive any further severance payments or benefits under the Severance Policy, and to the extent permitted by law, the Named Executive Officer will be required to repay to us any severance payments or benefits (or gain derived from such payments or benefits) he received under the Severance Policy.
In addition to any benefits available to Named Executive Officers under the Severance Policy, in the event of a change of control of the Company absent a qualified termination (as defined in the Severance Policy), any outstanding PSUs will be deemed to be achieved at 100% of target, subject, in certain circumstances, to continued time-based vesting.
| 2025 Proxy Statement | 59 | ||||||
n EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Amended and Restated FY2018 Equity Incentive Plan and 2007 Stock Plan
Our Amended and Restated FY2018 Equity Incentive Plan, or the 2018 Plan, provides that in the event of a merger or change in control, as defined under our 2018 Plan, each outstanding award will be treated as the administrator determines, without a participant’s consent. The administrator is not required to treat all awards or participants similarly.
In the event that a successor corporation or its parent or subsidiary does not assume or substitute an equivalent award for any outstanding award, then such award will fully vest, all restrictions on such award will lapse, all performance goals or other vesting criteria applicable to such award will be deemed achieved at 100% of target levels and all other terms and conditions met and such award will become fully exercisable, if applicable. If an option or stock appreciation right is not assumed or substituted, the administrator will notify the participant in writing or electronically that such option or stock appreciation right will be exercisable for a period of time determined by the administrator in its sole discretion and the option or stock appreciation right will terminate upon the expiration of such period.
In the event of a change in control, with respect to awards granted to an outside director, his or her options and other equity awards will vest fully and become immediately exercisable, all restrictions on his or her restricted stock and RSU awards will lapse and all performance goals or other vesting requirements for his or her performance shares and units will be deemed achieved at 100% of target levels, and all other terms and conditions met.
In addition, the agreements for certain performance-based awards granted to certain employees, including our Named Executive Officers hold that performance shares and units will be deemed achieved at 100% of target levels, and all other terms and conditions met, and be subject to continued time-based vesting as set forth in individual award agreements in the event of a change in control.
Our 2007 Stock Plan, or the 2007 Plan, provides that, in the event of a merger or change in control, as defined under our 2007 Plan, each outstanding award may be assumed or substituted for an equivalent award. In the event that awards are not assumed or substituted for, then the vesting of outstanding awards will be accelerated, and stock options will become exercisable in full prior to such transaction. In addition, if an option is not assumed or substituted in the event of a merger or change in control, the administrator will notify the participant that such award will be fully vested and exercisable for a specified period prior to the transaction, and such award will terminate upon the expiration of such period for no consideration, unless otherwise determined by the administrator.
60 | 2025 Proxy Statement | | ||||||
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION n
Fiscal 2025 Summary Compensation Table
The following table presents information regarding the compensation awarded to, earned by and paid to each of our Named Executive Officers during fiscal 2025, fiscal 2024 and fiscal 2023.
| Name and Principal Position | Year | Salary ($) | Bonus ($) | Stock Awards ($)(1) | Option Awards ($) | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($) | All Other Compensation ($) | Total ($) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Jay Chaudhry Chief Executive Officer | 2025 | 23,660 | — | — | — | — | 6,093(2) | 29,753 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 23,660 | — | — | — | — | 1,502(3) | 25,162 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2023 | 23,660 | — | 57,751,823(4) | — | — | — | 57,775,483 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Kevin Rubin(5) Chief Financial Officer | 2025 | 87,235 | — | 21,551,351(6) | 8,517,865(7) | 90,067 | 42,430(8) | 30,288,948 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Adam Geller(9) Chief Product Officer | 2025 | 376,705 | — | 21,943,522(6) | 5,940,380(7) | 380,020 | — | 28,640,627 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Raj Judge(10) Executive Vice President of Corporate Strategy | 2025 | 135,227 | — | 24,521,123(6) | — | 160,809 | — | 24,817,159 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Mike Rich Chief Revenue Officer | 2025 | 470,000 | — | 6,755,522(6) | — | 474,231 | — | 7,699,753 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 337,500 | 550,000(11) | 31,670,542(12) | 5,870,305(7) | 374,249 | 550,000(13) | 39,352,596 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Remo Canessa Former Chief Financial Officer | 2025 | 470,000 | — | — | — | 474,231 | 12,513(2) | 956,744 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 450,000 | — | 6,165,751(12) | — | 489,195 | 27,909(2) | 7,132,855 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2023 | 430,000 | — | 5,383,820(3) | — | 268,548 | — | 6,082,368 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(1)The amounts reported represent the grant date fair value of the stock awards granted to the Named Executive Officers during the respective fiscal years as computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The assumptions used in calculating the grant date fair value of the awards reported in this column are set forth in Note 13 to our audited consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report.
(2)The amounts reported represent the eligible executive benefits paid by the Company and associated tax gross-ups.
(3)The amounts reported represent the payout of accrued vacation time due to change in Company policy in fiscal 2024.
(4)The awards for fiscal 2023 are comprised of (i) time-based RSU and (ii) PSU awards. The amounts shown in respect of the PSU awards represent the grant date fair value based on the probable outcome of the fiscal 2023 performance condition as of the grant date. The grant date fair value of the PSU awards for which metrics were determined in fiscal 2023 assuming achievement of the maximum level of performance are: Mr. Chaudhry, $64,681,951; Mr. Canessa, $1,884,419. These amounts do not necessarily correspond to the actual value that will be recognized by the Named Executive Officers.
(5)Mr. Rubin was appointed Chief Financial Officer on May 26, 2025.
(6)The awards for fiscal 2025 are comprised of (i) time-based RSU and/or (ii) PSU awards. The amounts shown in respect of the PSU awards represent the grant date fair value based on the probable outcome of the fiscal 2024 performance condition as of the grant date. The grant date fair value of the PSU awards for which metrics were determined in fiscal 2025 assuming achievement of the maximum level of performance are: Mr. Rubin $12,783,650; Mr. Geller $21,943,522, Mr. Judge $3,550,981 and Mr. Rich $6,755,520. These amounts do not necessarily correspond to the actual value that will be recognized by the Named Executive Officers.
(7)The amounts reported represent the aggregate grant date fair value of the stock options granted to our Named Executive Officers, calculated in accordance with ASC Topic 718. The assumptions used in calculating the grant date fair value of the awards reported in this column are set forth in Note 13 to our audited consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report. These amounts do not necessarily correspond to the actual value that will be recognized by the Named Executive Officers.
(8)In June 2025, Mr. Rubin received a $25,000 relocation cash allowance, temporary housing fees of $7,013 and an associated tax gross-up of $10,417 pursuant to the Rubin Offer Letter.
(9)Mr. Geller was appointed Chief Product Officer on September 30, 2024 and appointed as an Executive Officer in November 2024.
(10)Mr. Judge was appointed as Executive Vice President of Corporate Strategy and Director on and effective as of May 20, 2025.
(11)Mr. Rich received a one-time $550,000 sign-on bonus in November 2023 pursuant to the Rich Offer Letter.
(12)The awards for fiscal 2024 are comprised of (i) time-based RSU and/or (ii) PSU awards. The amounts shown in respect of the PSU awards represent the grant date fair value based on the probable outcome of the fiscal 2024 performance condition as of the grant date. The grant date fair value of the PSU awards for which metrics were determined in fiscal 2024 assuming achievement of the maximum level of performance are: Mr. Canessa, $6,165,751 and Mr. Rich $17,034,541. These amounts do not necessarily correspond to the actual value that will be recognized by the Named Executive Officers.
(13)Mr. Rich received a $550,000 consulting fee in November 2023 in connection with services rendered to the Company pursuant to a consulting agreement entered into with the Company in September 2023.
| 2025 Proxy Statement | 61 | ||||||
n EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Fiscal 2025 Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table
The following table sets forth certain information with respect to all plan-based awards granted to our Named Executive Officers during fiscal 2025.
Estimated Possible Payouts under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards(1) | Estimated Possible Payouts under Equity Incentive Plan Awards(2) | All Other Stock Awards: Number of shares of Stock or Units (#) | Exercise Price of Option Awards ($) | Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Options Awards ($)(3) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Name | Grant Date | Threshold ($) | Target ($) | Maximum ($) | Threshold (#) | Target (#) | Maximum (#) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Jay Chaudhry | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Kevin Rubin | 05/20/2025 | — | 89,264 | 178,528 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 06/03/2025 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50,000 | 295.03 | 8,517,865 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 06/03/2025 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 51,383 | — | 15,159,526 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 06/03/2025 | — | — | — | — | 10,833 | — | — | — | 3,196,060 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 06/03/2025 | — | — | — | — | 10,832 | — | — | — | 3,195,765 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Adam Geller | 11/26/2024 | — | 376,630 | 753,260 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 12/05/2024 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50,000 | 205.61 | 5,940,380 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 12/05/2024 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 53,362 | — | 10,971,761 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 12/05/2024 | — | — | — | — | 17,788 | — | — | — | 3,657,391 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 12/05/2024 | — | — | — | — | 17,787 | — | — | — | 3,657,185 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 12/05/2024 | — | — | — | — | 17,787 | — | — | — | 3,657,185 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Raj Judge | 06/03/2025 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 9,948 | — | 2,934,958 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 06/03/2025 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 67,148 | — | 19,810,674 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 06/03/2025 | — | — | — | — | 2,006 | — | — | — | 591,830 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 06/03/2025 | — | — | — | — | 2,006 | — | — | — | 591,830 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 06/03/2025 | — | — | — | — | 2,006 | — | — | — | 591,830 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mike Rich | 10/23/2024 | — | 470,000 | 940,000 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 12/05/2024 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 16,428 | — | 3,377,761 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 12/05/2024 | — | — | — | — | 5,476 | — | — | — | 1,125,920 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 12/05/2024 | — | — | — | — | 5,476 | — | — | — | 1,125,920 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 12/05/2024 | — | — | — | — | 5,476 | — | — | — | 1,125,920 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Remo Canessa | 10/23/2024 | — | 470,000 | 940,000 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1)These amounts reflect the fiscal 2025 target cash bonus award amounts for each of our Named Executive Officers under our Executive Incentive Compensation Plan, pro-rated for Mr. Rubin and Mr. Geller. Mr. Chaudhry did not participate in the Executive Incentive Compensation Plan. There are no threshold bonus amounts under the Executive Incentive Compensation Plan. The amounts set forth do not represent actual compensation earned or earnable by the Named Executive Officers for fiscal 2025. Please see the "Fiscal 2025 Summary Compensation Table" for the amounts earned by our Named Executive Officers for fiscal 2025. For a description of the Executive Incentive Compensation Plan, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis–Annual Cash Bonuses” above.
(2)These amounts reflect PSU awards granted and eligible to be earned based on achievement of long-term ARR targets established during fiscal 2025 under our 2018 Equity Incentive Plan. For a description of the fiscal 2025 PSU program, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis–Long-Term Incentive Compensation” above.
(3)The amounts reported represent the aggregate grant date fair value of the stock awards granted to our Named Executive Officers in fiscal 2025, calculated in accordance with ASC Topic 718. The assumptions used in calculating the grant date fair value are set forth in the notes to our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report. These amounts do not necessarily correspond to the actual value that will be recognized by the Named Executive Officers.
62 | 2025 Proxy Statement | | ||||||
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION n
Fiscal 2025 Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End Table
The following table provides information regarding outstanding equity awards held by our Named Executive Officers as of July 31, 2025.
| Option Awards | Stock Awards | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Name | Grant Date | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Exercisable (#) | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Unexercisable (#) | Option Exercise Price ($) | Option Expiration Date | Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#) | Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($)(1) | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares or Units That Have Not Vested (#) | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market Value of Unearned Shares or Units or That Have Not Vested ($) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Jay Chaudhry | 10/17/22 | (2) | — | — | — | — | 13,658 | 3,900,178 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 10/17/22 | (3) | — | — | — | — | — | — | 174,815 | 49,920,171 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4/28/23 | (2) | — | — | — | — | 18,040 | 5,151,502 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4/28/23 | (3) | — | — | — | — | — | — | 230,902 | 65,936,375 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Kevin Rubin | 6/3/25 | (4) | — | 50,000 | 295.03 | 49,463 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 6/3/25 | (5) | — | — | — | — | 51,383 | 14,672,929 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 6/3/25 | (3) | — | — | — | — | — | — | 10,833 | 3,093,471 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 6/3/25 | (3) | — | — | — | — | — | — | 10,832 | 3,093,186 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Adam Geller | 12/5/24 | (6) | — | 50,000 | 205.61 | 49,283 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 12/5/24 | (7) | — | — | — | — | 46,691 | 13,333,082 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 12/5/24 | (3) | — | — | — | — | — | — | 17,788 | 5,079,541 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 12/5/24 | (3) | — | — | — | — | — | — | 17,787 | 5,079,256 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 12/5/24 | (3) | — | — | — | — | — | — | 17,787 | 5,079,256 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Raj Judge | 6/3/25 | (8) | — | — | — | — | 7,461 | 2,130,563 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 6/3/25 | (9) | — | — | — | — | 62,951 | 17,976,288 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 6/3/25 | (3) | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2,006 | 572,833 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 6/3/25 | (3) | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2,006 | 572,833 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 6/3/25 | (3) | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2,006 | 572,833 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2025 Proxy Statement | 63 | ||||||
n EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
| Option Awards | Stock Awards | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Name | Grant Date | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Exercisable (#) | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Unexercisable (#) | Option Exercise Price ($) | Option Expiration Date | Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#) | Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($)(1) | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares or Units That Have Not Vested (#) | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market Value of Unearned Shares or Units or That Have Not Vested ($) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mike Rich | 12/1/23 | (10) | 20,833 | 29,167 | 198.03 | 12/01/33 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 12/1/23 | (11) | — | — | — | — | 56,451 | 16,120,148 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 12/1/23 | (12) | — | — | — | — | 1,034 | 295,269 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 12/1/23 | (3) | — | — | — | — | — | — | 14,336 | 4,093,788 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 12/1/23 | (3) | — | — | — | — | — | — | 14,337 | 4,094,074 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 12/1/23 | (3) | — | — | — | — | — | — | 14,337 | 4,094,074 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 12/5/24 | (13) | — | — | — | — | 14,375 | 4,104,925 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 12/5/24 | (3) | — | — | — | — | — | — | 5,476 | 1,563,727 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 12/5/24 | (3) | — | — | — | — | — | — | 5,476 | 1,563,727 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 12/5/24 | (3) | — | — | — | — | — | — | 5,476 | 1,563,727 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Remo Canessa | 4/13/21 | (11) | — | — | — | — | 7,607 | 2,172,255 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 9/1/21 | (12) | — | — | — | — | 2,567 | 733,033 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 10/17/22 | (11) | — | — | — | — | 8,594 | 2,454,103 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 10/17/22 | (3) | — | — | — | — | — | — | 5,093 | 1,454,357 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4/28/23 | (11) | — | — | — | — | 11,352 | 3,241,677 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4/28/23 | (3) | — | — | — | — | — | — | 6,727 | 1,920,962 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 11/13/23 | (14) | — | — | — | — | 10,093 | 2,882,157 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 11/13/23 | (3) | — | — | — | — | — | — | 17,303 | 4,941,045 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1)This column represents the market value of the shares underlying the RSU awards or PSU awards, as applicable, as of July 31, 2025, based on the closing price of our common stock, as reported on NASDAQ, of $285.56 per share on July 31, 2025.
(2)The remaining RSUs vest in equal quarterly installments through September 15, 2026.
(3)Upon achievement of specified performance metrics, earned PSU awards vest 100% on the first quarterly vesting date after achievement has been certified. Amounts reported reflect achievement at target.
(4)One-fourth of the shares subject to the option vest on May 26, 2026 and the remaining shares vest monthly through May 26, 2029.
(5)Twelve and one half percent of the shares vest on December 15, 2025 and the remaining shares vest in equal quarterly installments through June 15, 2029.
(6)One-fourth of the shares subject to the option vest on September 30, 2025 and the remaining shares vest monthly through September 30, 2028.
(7)The remaining RSUs vest in equal quarterly installments through December 15, 2028.
(8)The remaining RSUs vest in equal quarterly installments through March 15, 2026.
(9)The remaining RSUs vest in equal quarterly installments through March 15, 2029.
(10)The remaining options vest monthly through November 1, 2027.
(11)The remaining RSUs vest in equal quarterly installments through September 15, 2027.
(12)The remaining RSUs vest on September 15, 2025.
(13)The remaining RSUs vest in equal quarterly installments through December 15, 2028.
(14)The remaining RSUs vest in equal quarterly installments through March 15, 2027.
64 | 2025 Proxy Statement | | ||||||
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION n
Fiscal 2025 Option Exercises and Stock Vested Table
The following table presents, for each of our Named Executive Officers, the shares of our common stock that were acquired upon the exercise of stock options and the related value realized upon exercise during fiscal 2025 and upon the vesting of stock awards and the related value realized upon vesting during fiscal 2025.
| Option Awards | Stock Awards | |||||||||||||||||||
| Name | Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#) | Value Realized on Exercise ($)(1) | Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#) | Value Realized on Vesting ($)(2) | ||||||||||||||||
| Jay Chaudhry | — | — | 25,357 | 5,602,959 | ||||||||||||||||
| Kevin Rubin | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
| Adam Geller | — | — | 6,671 | 2,034,788 | ||||||||||||||||
| Raj Judge | — | — | 6,684 | 2,038,754 | ||||||||||||||||
| Mike Rich | — | — | 33,346 | 7,334,169 | ||||||||||||||||
| Remo Canessa | — | — | 36,658 | 7,657,763 | ||||||||||||||||
(1)The value realized on exercise is pre-tax and represents the difference between the market price of our common stock on the date of exercise less the option exercise price paid for those shares, multiplied by the number of shares for which the option was exercised.
(2)The value realized on vesting is calculated as the number of vested shares multiplied by the closing market price of our common stock on the vesting date.
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control
The tables below quantify the potential payments to our Named Executive Officers under the terms of (i) the Severance Policy and individual agreements in the event of a qualifying termination of employment that is not in connection with a change in control of the Company, (ii) the Severance Policy in the event of a qualifying termination of employment in connection with a change in control of the Company and (iii) individual award agreements and company policies solely in connection with a change in control of the Company. The amounts shown assume that the change in control and/or termination of employment occurred on July 31, 2025, the last business day of fiscal 2025. The values reflected also assume that the payments and benefits to our Named Executive Officers are not reduced by virtue of the provision in the Severance Policy relating to Sections 280G and 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code.
| 2025 Proxy Statement | 65 | ||||||
n EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Potential Payments Upon Termination Not in Connection with a Change in Control
| Value of Accelerated Equity Awards | |||||||||||||||||
| Named Executive Officer | Salary Severance ($) | Restricted Stock Units ($)(1) | Options ($)(2) | Total ($) | |||||||||||||
| Jay Chaudhry | 11,830 | 1,810,165 | — | 1,821,995 | |||||||||||||
| Kevin Rubin | 235,000 | 1,834,152 | — | 2,069,152 | |||||||||||||
| Adam Geller | 225,000 | 952,343 | 1,332,447 | 2,509,790 | |||||||||||||
| Raj Judge | 212,500 | 1,908,683 | — | 2,121,183 | |||||||||||||
| Mike Rich | 235,000 | 2,084,302 | 1,279,450 | 3,598,752 | |||||||||||||
| Remo Canessa | 235,000 | 1,291,017 | — | 1,526,017 | |||||||||||||
(1)Reflects the aggregate market value of the unvested shares of our common stock underlying outstanding RSU awards. The aggregate market value is equal to the product obtained by multiplying (i) the number of unvested shares of our common stock subject to outstanding RSU awards and eligible for accelerated vesting as of July 31, 2025, by (ii) $285.56 per share (the closing market price of our common stock on Nasdaq on July 31, 2025, the last trading day in the fiscal year ended July 31, 2025).
(2)These amounts reflect the aggregate market value of the unvested shares of our common stock underlying outstanding options. The aggregate market value is equal to (i) the product obtained by multiplying (x) the number of unvested shares of our common stock subject to outstanding options as of July 31, 2025, by (y) $285.56 per share (the closing market price of our common stock on the Nasdaq Global Select Market on July 31, 2025), minus (ii) the aggregate exercise price for such unvested shares.
Potential Payments Upon Termination in Connection with a Change in Control
| Value of Accelerated Equity Awards | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Named Executive Officer | Salary Severance ($) | Bonus Severance ($) | Restricted Stock Units ($)(1) | Options ($)(2) | Health Benefit Severance Payments ($) | Total ($) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Jay Chaudhry | 23,000 | — | 124,908,227 | — | 36,000 | 124,967,227 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Kevin Rubin | 470,000 | 559,267 | 9,280,129 | — | 36,000 | 7,251,924 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Adam Geller | 450,000 | 670,505 | 28,571,135 | 3,997,500 | 36,000 | 33,725,140 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Raj Judge | 425,000 | 637,500 | 21,825,351 | — | 36,000 | 22,923,851 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mike Rich | 470,000 | 702,884 | 37,493,457 | 4,376,500 | 36,000 | 43,078,841 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Remo Canessa | 470,000 | 702,884 | 19,799,588 | — | 36,000 | 21,008,472 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1)These amounts reflect the aggregate market value of the unvested shares of our common stock underlying outstanding RSU and PSU awards. The aggregate market value is equal to the product obtained by multiplying (i) the number of unvested shares of our common stock subject to outstanding RSU and PSU awards as of July 31, 2025, by (ii) $285.56 per share (the closing market price of our common stock on the Nasdaq Global Select Market on July 31, 2025, the last trading day in the fiscal year ended July 31, 2025). For performance-based restricted stock unit awards, the assumed number of unvested shares is equal to the target number of shares subject to such award.
(2)These amounts reflect the aggregate market value of the unvested shares of our common stock underlying outstanding options. The aggregate market value is equal to (i) the product obtained by multiplying (x) the number of unvested shares of our common stock subject to outstanding options as of July 31, 2025, by (y) $285.56 per share (the closing market price of our common stock on the Nasdaq Global Select Market on July 31, 2025), minus (ii) the aggregate exercise price for such unvested shares.
66 | 2025 Proxy Statement | | ||||||
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION n
Potential Payments Solely in Connection with a Change in Control
The number of performance-based RSUs in the table below for each of our Named Executive Officers reflects the aggregate market value of the unvested shares of our common stock underlying outstanding performance-based RSU awards at target. The aggregate market value is equal to the product obtained by multiplying (i) the number of unvested shares of our common stock subject to outstanding performance-based RSU awards as of July 31, 2025, by (ii) $285.56 per share (the closing market price of our common stock on the Nasdaq Global Select Market on July 31, 2025, the last trading day in the fiscal year ended July 31, 2025). The unvested shares are equal to the target number of shares subject to such award. A portion of such shares will become 100% vested upon the closing of the change in control event, calculated by multiplying the target number of RSUs by the quotient attained by dividing (i) our ARR as calculated on the date of the closing by (ii) the target ARR. Any remaining RSUs will be subject to time based vesting depending on the progress toward completion of performance metrics as assessed above at the time of the change in control event, such that any remaining RSUs will vest quarterly following the change in control in equal installments, so that all remaining RSUs will be vested four years from the grant date.
| Value of Accelerated Equity Awards | |||||||||||
| Named Executive Officer | Performance-based Restricted Stock Units ($) | ||||||||||
| Jay Chaudhry | 115,856,547 | ||||||||||
| Kevin Rubin | 6,186,657 | ||||||||||
| Adam Geller | 15,238,053 | ||||||||||
| Raj Judge | 1,718,500 | ||||||||||
| Mike Rich | 16,973,115 | ||||||||||
| Remo Canessa | 9,049,396 | ||||||||||
| 2025 Proxy Statement | 67 | ||||||
n EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table provides information as of July 31, 2025 with respect to shares of our common stock that may be issued under our existing equity compensation plans.
| Plan Category | Number of Securities to be Issued upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Restricted Stock Units and Rights (#) | Weighted Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options and Rights ($) | Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding Securities Reflected in the First Column) (#) | |||||||||||
| Equity compensation plans approved by security holders | — | — | — | |||||||||||
2007 Stock Plan(1) | 100 | 5.93 | — | |||||||||||
Fiscal Year 2018 Equity Incentive Plan(2)(3) | 10,252,858 | 221.07 | 35,160,793 | |||||||||||
Fiscal Year 2018 Employee Stock Purchase Plan(4) | — | — | 7,922,972 | |||||||||||
| Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders | — | — | — | |||||||||||
| Total | 10,252,958 | 220.95 | 43,083,765 | |||||||||||
(1)As a result of the adoption of the 2018 Plan, we no longer grant awards under the 2007 Plan; however, all outstanding options issued pursuant to the 2007 Plan continue to be governed by their existing terms. To the extent that any such awards are forfeited or lapse unexercised or are repurchased, the shares of common stock subject to such awards will become available for issuance under the 2018 Plan.
(2)Our 2018 Plan provides that the number of shares available for issuance under the 2018 Plan will be increased on the first day of each fiscal year, in an amount equal to the least of (i) 12,700,000 shares, (ii) five percent (5%) of the outstanding shares of common stock on the last day of the immediately preceding fiscal year or (iii) such other amount as our board of directors may determine.
(3)Includes all outstanding PSU awards as of July 31, 2025 (a) at maximum payout if performance metrics have been determined and (b) at target if no performance metrics have been determined as of the end of fiscal 2025.
(4)Our Fiscal Year 2018 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, or the ESPP, provides that the number of shares available for issuance under the ESPP will be increased on the first day of each fiscal year, in an amount equal to the least of (i) 2,200,000 shares, (ii) one percent (1%) of the outstanding shares of common stock on the last day of the immediately preceding fiscal year or (iii) such other amount as may be determined by the administrator of the ESPP.
Compensation Committee Report
The compensation committee has reviewed and discussed the section titled “Executive Compensation” with management, which includes the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K. Based on such review and discussion, the compensation committee has recommended to the board of directors that the section titled “Executive Compensation” be included in this Proxy Statement.
Respectfully submitted by the members of the compensation committee of the board of directors:
Andrew Brown (Chair)
Charles Giancarlo
Charles Giancarlo
Eileen Naughton
68 | 2025 Proxy Statement | | ||||||
CEO Pay Ratio Disclosure
As required by SEC rules, we are providing the following information about the relationship between the annual total compensation of our Chief Executive Officer and President, Jay Chaudhry (our CEO), and the annual total compensation of our median employee, or our CEO pay ratio.
For fiscal 2025, the median of the annual total compensation of all employees of our Company (other than our CEO) was $142,139 and the annual total compensation of our CEO was $23,660. Accordingly, the ratio of the annual total compensation of our CEO to the median of the annual total compensation of all employees was approximately 0.17 to 1. This pay ratio is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with SEC rules.
We selected July 31, 2025, the last day of our fiscal year, as the determination date for identifying our median employee. As of July 31, 2025, our employee population consisted of approximately 8,240 individuals (other than our CEO) working at our parent company and consolidated subsidiaries both within and outside the United States, which included all employees whether employed on a full-time, part-time, temporary or seasonal basis. We did not include any contractors or other non-employee workers in our employee population.
To identify our median employee, we used a consistently applied compensation measure consisting of the target base salary of our employees for the 12-month period from August 1, 2024 through July 31, 2025. We selected the foregoing compensation element because it represented our principal broad-based compensation element. Payments not made in U.S. dollars were converted to U.S. dollars using the applicable currency exchange rate in effect as of July 31, 2025. We did not make any cost-of-living adjustment.
Using this approach, we selected the individual at the median of our employee population, who was a full-time employee based in Singapore. We then calculated annual total compensation for this individual using the same methodology we use for our Named Executive Officers as set forth in our Fiscal 2025 Summary Compensation Table.
With respect to the annual total compensation of our CEO, we used the amount reported in the “Total” column (column (i)) of our Fiscal 2025 Summary Compensation Table in this Proxy Statement. Because SEC rules for identifying the median of the annual total compensation of all employees allow companies to adopt a variety of methodologies, apply certain exclusions and make reasonable estimates and assumptions that reflect their employee population and compensation practices, the pay ratio reported by other companies may not be comparable to our pay ratio, as other companies have different employee populations and compensation practices and may have used different methodologies, exclusions, estimates and assumptions in calculating their pay ratios. As explained by the SEC when it adopted these rules, the rule was not designed to facilitate comparisons of pay ratios among different companies, even companies within the same industry, but rather to allow stockholders to better understand and assess each particular company’s compensation practices and pay ratio disclosures.
| 2025 Proxy Statement | 69 | ||||||
Pay Versus Performance
As required by Section 953(a) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, or the PvP Rules, we are providing the following: (1) tabular compensation and performance disclosure for our fiscal years 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024 and 2025; (2) a list of three performance measures that the Company considers to be its most important measures used to align compensation actually paid to the Named Executive Officers, or NEOs, for 2025 to Company performance; and (3) additional disclosure relative to the relationship between the Compensation Actually Paid, or CAP, set forth in the Pay versus Performance Table and each of the performance metrics set forth in the Pay versus Performance Table and between the Company’s and the Peer Group TSR, in each case over 2021-2025. For further information concerning our pay-for-performance philosophy and how we align executive compensation with our performance, see “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis” in this Proxy Statement and in our proxy statements filed for fiscal 2021, 2022, 2023 and 2024.
In the below pay versus performance table, we provide information about compensation of our NEOs for each of the last five fiscal years, or the Covered Years. Additionally, we provide information about the results for certain financial performance measures during the Covered Years. Although the PvP Rules require us to disclose CAP, these amounts do not necessarily reflect compensation that our NEOs actually earned in the Covered Years. Instead, CAP reflects a calculation computed in accordance with the PvP Rules, including adjusted values to unvested and vested equity awards during the Covered Years based on either year-end or vesting date stock prices and various accounting valuation assumptions. CAP generally fluctuates due to annual stock price performance.
PAY VERSUS PERFORMANCE
| Value of Initial Fixed $100 Investment Based on: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Year | Summary Compensation Table Total for PEO (1) | Compensation Actually Paid for PEO (2) | Average Summary Compensation Table Total for Non-PEO NEOs (3) | Average Compensation Actually Paid for Non-PEO NEOs (4) | Total Shareholder Return (5) | Peer Group Total Shareholder Return (6) | Net Income | Company-Selected Measure: Revenue (7) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 2025 | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | ($ | $ | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | ($ | $ | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 2023 | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | ($ | $ | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | ($ | $ | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | ($ | $ | |||||||||||||||||||||
(1)Amounts reported in this column represent the total compensation reported in the Summary Compensation Table for the indicated fiscal year for our PEO. For all years reported, our PEO was Mr. Jay Chaudhry
(2)Amounts reported in this column represent the compensation actually paid to our PEO, based on his total compensation reported in the Summary Compensation Table for each of the indicated fiscal years and adjusted as shown in the table below:
70 | 2025 Proxy Statement | | ||||||
PAY VERSUS PERFORMANCE n
PEO (Jay Chaudhry)
| 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Summary Compensation Table – Total Compensation | (a) | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||||||||
| — | Grant Date Fair Value of Stock Awards and Option Awards Granted in Fiscal Year | (b) | -$ | -$ | -$ | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||||||
| + | Fair Value at Fiscal Year End of Outstanding and Unvested Stock Awards and Option Awards Granted in Fiscal Year | (c) | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||||||
| + | Change in Fair Value of Outstanding and Unvested Stock Awards and Option Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Years | (d) | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||||||
| + | Fair Value at Vesting of Stock Awards and Option Awards Granted in Fiscal Year That Vested During Fiscal Year | (e) | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||||||
| + | Change in Fair Value as of Vesting Date of Stock Awards and Option Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Years For Which Applicable Vesting Conditions Were Satisfied During Fiscal Year | (f) | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||||||
| — | Fair Value as of Prior Fiscal Year End of Stock Awards and Option Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Years That Failed to Meet Applicable Vesting Conditions During Fiscal Year | (g) | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||||||
| — | Compensation Actually Paid | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||||||||
Equity Award Valuations: Equity values are calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, and the valuation assumptions used to calculate fair values did not materially differ from those disclosed at the time of grant.
(3)Amounts reported in this column represent the average of the total compensation reported in the Summary Compensation Table for the indicated fiscal year for our Named Executive Officers (excluding our PEO), or our NEOs, as listed below:
| Fiscal Year | Non-PEO NEOs | ||||
| 2025 | Kevin Rubin, Adam Geller, Raj Judge, Mike Rich and Remo Canessa | ||||
| 2024 | Remo Canessa, Syam Nair, Mike Rich and Robert Schlossman | ||||
| 2023 | Remo Canessa, Syam Nair, Dali Rajic and Robert Schlossman | ||||
| 2022 | Remo Canessa, Dali Rajic, Robert Schlossman and Amit Sinha | ||||
| 2021 | Remo Canessa, Dali Rajic, Robert Schlossman and Amit Sinha | ||||
| 2025 Proxy Statement | 71 | ||||||
n PAY VERSUS PERFORMANCE
(4)Amounts reported in this column represent the compensation actually paid to the Reported NEOs in the indicated fiscal year, as calculated under Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K based on the average total compensation for such NEOs reported in the Summary Compensation Table for the indicated fiscal year and adjusted as shown in the table below:
NEO
| 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Summary Compensation Table – Total Compensation | (a) | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||||||||
| — | Grant Date Fair Value of Stock Awards and Option Awards Granted in Fiscal Year | (b) | -$ | -$ | -$ | -$ | -$ | |||||||||||||||||||
| + | Fair Value at Fiscal Year End of Outstanding and Unvested Stock Awards and Option Awards Granted in Fiscal Year | (c) | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||||||
| + | Change in Fair Value of Outstanding and Unvested Stock Awards and Option Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Years | (d) | $ | -$ | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||||||
| + | Fair Value at Vesting of Stock Awards and Option Awards Granted in Fiscal Year That Vested During Fiscal Year | (e) | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||||||
| + | Change in Fair Value as of Vesting Date of Stock Awards and Option Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Years For Which Applicable Vesting Conditions Were Satisfied During Fiscal Year | (f) | $ | $ | -$ | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||||||
| — | Fair Value as of Prior Fiscal Year End of Stock Awards and Option Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Years That Failed to Meet Applicable Vesting Conditions During Fiscal Year | (g) | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||||||
| — | Compensation Actually Paid | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||||||||
Equity Award Valuations: Equity values are calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, and the valuation assumptions used to calculate fair values did not materially differ from those disclosed at the time of grant.
(5)Pursuant to Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, the comparison assumes $100 was invested in our common stock on July 31, 2020, using the closing stock price on that date. Historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance.
(6)The TSR Peer Group consists of the S&P 500 Information Technology Index. This calculation assumes that $100 was invested in this index on July 31, 2020 (aligned with the period used in footnote 5 above).
(7)We have selected revenue as the Company-Selected Measure because it is a core driver of our performance and stockholder value creation and, accordingly, was utilized as a metric for performance-based RSUs.
Tabular List of Financial Performance Measures
The following is a list of financial performance measures, which in the Company’s assessment represent the most important financial performance measures used by the Company to link compensation actually paid to the NEOs for 2025. These measures were either used to determine payouts in our Fiscal 2025 Bonus Plan or are tied to vesting of the PSUs.
72 | 2025 Proxy Statement | | ||||||
PAY VERSUS PERFORMANCE n
Relationship Between Pay and Performance
“Compensation actually paid,” as calculated per SEC Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, reflects cash compensation actually paid as well as changes to the fair values of equity awards during the years shown in the table based on year-end or vesting date stock prices, various accounting valuation assumptions, and projected performance modifiers. Due to how CAP is calculated, the CAP as reported for each year does not reflect the actual amounts earned by our NEOs from their equity awards. CAP generally fluctuates annually due to the change in our stock price from year to year as well as varying levels of actual achievement of performance goals.
Because CAP does not reflect the actual amount earned by our NEOs on their equity compensation, we do not use this measure for understanding how NEO pay aligns with our company performance. For a discussion of how our compensation committee assessed “pay-for-performance” and how our executive compensation program is designed to link executive compensation with the achievement of our financial and strategic objectives as well as stockholder value creation each year, see “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis” in this Proxy Statement and in our proxy statements filed for fiscal 2021, 2022, 2023 and 2024.
Below are graphs showing the relationship of “Compensation Actually Paid” to our PEO and non-PEO NEOs for our fiscal years 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024 and 2025 to (1) TSR of both our common stock and S&P 500 Information Technology Index, (2) our net loss, and (3) our total revenue.
| 2025 Proxy Statement | 73 | ||||||
n PAY VERSUS PERFORMANCE
74 | 2025 Proxy Statement | | ||||||
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of November 1, 2025 for:
▪each person, or group of affiliated persons, who beneficially owned more than 5% of our common stock;
▪each of our Named Executive Officers;
▪each of our directors and nominees for director; and
▪all of our current executive officers and directors as a group.
We have determined beneficial ownership in accordance with the rules of the SEC and the information is not necessarily indicative of beneficial ownership for any other purpose. Unless otherwise indicated below, to our knowledge, the persons and entities named in the table have sole voting and sole investment power with respect to all shares that they beneficially owned, subject to community property laws where applicable.
We have based our calculation of the percentage of beneficial ownership of 159,467,899 shares of our common stock outstanding as of November 1, 2025. We have deemed shares of our common stock subject to stock options that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of November 1, 2025, to be outstanding and to be beneficially owned by the person holding the stock option for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of that person. We did not deem these shares outstanding, however, for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person.
Unless otherwise indicated, the address of each beneficial owner listed in the table below is c/o Zscaler, Inc., 120 Holger Way, San Jose, California 95134.
| Name of Beneficial Owner | Number of Shares Beneficially Owned | Percentage of Shares Beneficially Owned | ||||||
| 5% Stockholders: | ||||||||
Ajay Mangal, as trustee(1) | 29,084,052 | 18.2% | ||||||
The Vanguard Group(2) | 11,367,838 | 7.1% | ||||||
| Named Executive Officers and Directors: | ||||||||
Jay Chaudhry(3) | 26,857,608 | 16.8% | ||||||
Kevin Rubin(4) | 6,423 | * | ||||||
Adam Geller(5) | 19,082 | * | ||||||
Raj Judge(6) | 16,787 | * | ||||||
| 2025 Proxy Statement | 75 | ||||||
n SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
| Name of Beneficial Owner | Number of Shares Beneficially Owned | Percentage of Shares Beneficially Owned | ||||||
Mike Rich(7) | 70,635 | * | ||||||
Remo Canessa(8) | 4,521 | * | ||||||
James Beer(9) | 2,722 | * | ||||||
Karen Blasing(10) | 67,305 | * | ||||||
Andrew Brown(11) | 27,216 | * | ||||||
Scott Darling(12) | 52,976 | * | ||||||
Charles Giancarlo(13) | 287,199 | * | ||||||
Eileen Naughton(14) | 6,669 | * | ||||||
David Schneider(15) | 23,836 | * | ||||||
All current executive officers and directors as a group (14 persons)(16) | 27,485,218 | 17.2% | ||||||
*Represents beneficial ownership of less than one percent (1%) of the outstanding shares of our common stock.
(1)Consists of (i) 21,433,421 shares held of record by The CJCP Trust for which Mr. Mangal serves as trustee, (ii) 2,550,210 shares held of record by The CKS Trust for the benefit of YPC dated 12/30/2017 for which Mr. Mangal serves as trustee, (iii) 2,550,211 shares held of record by The CKS Trust for the benefit of SRC dated 12/30/2017 for which Mr. Mangal serves as trustee and (iv) 2,550,210 shares held of record by The CKS Trust for the benefit of SDC dated 12/30/2017 for which Mr. Mangal serves as trustee. The beneficiaries of The CJCP Trust and each of The CKS Trusts are members of Jay Chaudhry’s family. The address for The CJCP Trust and The CKS Trust is c/o The Goldman Sachs Trust Company, 200 Bellevue Parkway, Suite 250, Wilmington, Delaware 19809. This information is derived from Form 4 filed by Ajay Mangal with the SEC on June 11, 2025.
(2)Consists of (i) 10,525,409 shares of sole dispositive power, (ii) 842,429 shares of shared dispositive power and (iii) 646,386 shares of shared voting power. The address for the Vanguard Group is 100 Vanguard Blvd, Malvern, PA 19355. This information is derived from Schedule 13G/A filed by The Vanguard Group with the SEC on October 31, 2025.
(3)Consists of (i) 325,342 shares held of record by Mr. Chaudhry, (ii) 2,177,994 shares held of record by Jagtar S Chaudhry TTEE The RSJ Trust U/A DTD 06/07/2017, (iii) 24,341,267 shares held of record by Jyoti Chaudhry TTEE The RSP Trust U/A DTD 06/07/2017, (iv) 6,666 shares held of record by P. Jyoti Chaudhry Family Trust dated March 1, 2000 for which Surjit Kaur serves as trustee and (v) 6,339 shares issuable upon vesting of RSU awards within 60 days of November 1, 2025.
(4)Consists of 6,423 shares issuable upon vesting of RSU awards within 60 days of November 1, 2025.
(5)Consists of (i) 122 shares held of record by Mr. Geller, (ii) 15,625 shares subject to options exercisable within 60 days of November 1, 2025, and (iii) 3,335 shares issuable upon vesting of RSU awards within 60 days of November 1, 2025.
(6)Consists of (i) 10,103 shares held of record by Mr. Judge and (ii) 6,684 shares issuable upon vesting of RSU awards within 60 days of November 1, 2025.
(7)Consists of (i) 37,295 shares held of record by Mr. Rich, (ii) 26,041 shares subject to options exercisable within 60 days of November 1, 2025, and (iii) 7,299 shares issuable upon vesting of RSU awards within 60 days of November 1, 2025.
(8)Consists of 4,521 shares issuable upon vesting of RSU awards within 60 days of November 1, 2025 pursuant to his transition agreement.
(9)Consists of (i) 2,159 shares held of record by Mr. Beer and (ii) 563 shares issuable upon vesting of RSU awards within 60 days of November 1, 2025.
(10)Consists of (i) 41,354 shares held of record by Ms. Blasing, (ii) 25,624 shares held of record by The Blasing Family Revocable Trust U/A dtd 12/22/2005 for which Ms. Blasing serves as trustee and (iii) 327 shares issuable upon vesting of RSU awards within 60 days of November 1, 2025.
(11)Consists of (i) 26,889 shares held of record by Mr. Brown and (ii) 327 shares issuable upon vesting of RSU awards within 60 days of November 1, 2025.
(12)Consists of (i) 3,948 shares held of record by Mr. Darling, (ii) 48,701 shares held of record by the Scott C. Darling Revocable Living Trust for which Mr. Darling serves as trustee and (iii) 327 shares issuable upon vesting of RSU awards within 60 days of November 1, 2025.
(13)Consists of (i) 144,048 shares held of record by Mr. Giancarlo, (ii) 125,000 shares are held of record by The Charles H. & Dianne G. Giancarlo Family Trust U/D/T 11/2/98 for which Mr. Giancarlo serves as trustee, (iii) 8,912 shares held of record by The 2012 Marielle Christina Giancarlo Trust UAD 12/26/12 for which Mr. Giancarlo serves as a trustee, (iv) 8,912 shares held of record by The 2012 Gianna Marie Giancarlo Trust UAD 12/26/12 for which Mr. Giancarlo serves as a trustee and (v) 327 shares issuable upon vesting of RSU awards within 60 days of November 1, 2025.
(14)Consists of (i) 6,342 shares held of record by Ms. Naughton and (ii) 327 shares issuable upon vesting of RSU awards within 60 days of November 1, 2025.
(15)Consists of (i) 23,509 shares held of record by Mr. Schneider and (ii) 327 shares issuable upon vesting of RSU awards within 60 days of November 1, 2025.
(16)Consists of (i) 27,401,238 shares beneficially owned by our current executive officers and directors, (ii) 41,666 shares subject to options exercisable within 60 days of November 1, 2025 and (iii) 42,314 shares issuable upon vesting of RSU awards within 60 days of November 1, 2025.
76 | 2025 Proxy Statement | | ||||||
Related Person Transactions
We describe below transactions and series of similar transactions, since the beginning of our last fiscal year, to which we were a party or will be a party, in which:
▪the amounts involved exceeded or will exceed $120,000; and
▪any of our directors, nominees for director, executive officers or beneficial holders of more than 5% of our outstanding capital stock, or any immediate family member of, or person sharing the household with, any of these individuals or entities (each, a related person), had or will have a direct or indirect material interest.
Transactions with Stockholders
From time to time, stockholders, including those that may beneficially own more than 5% of our outstanding capital stock subscribe to, license or otherwise purchase, in the normal course of business, certain of our products and services. These transactions are negotiated on an arm’s-length basis and are subject to review under the Company’s policies and procedures for related person transactions described below.
During fiscal year 2025, in the ordinary course of business, we provided The Vanguard Group (together with its affiliates, “Vanguard”), a greater than 5% beneficial holder of our capital stock, with certain services and products. The aggregate revenue recognized by us in fiscal year 2025 for such services and products exceeded $120,000. The transaction with Vanguard was entered into on an arm’s-length basis, contains customary terms and conditions and was approved under the Company’s related person transactions policy. In the future, we may provide, in the ordinary course of business, additional services and products to Vanguard.
Employment Relationships with Related Parties
For a portion of fiscal 2025, we employed Raj Krishna, the son-in-law of our Chairman and CEO, Jay Chaudhry, as Senior Vice President, Product New Initiatives. Mr. Krishna's compensation for fiscal 2025 exceeded $120,000, and consisted of a base salary, annual merit equity award and other benefits.
For a portion of fiscal 2025, Raj Judge was a senior partner of, and employed by, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich and Rosati, Professional Corporation, which serves as outside corporate counsel to the Company. The Company incurs bills for legal services that vary from year to year depending on legal needs, and all such arrangements have been entered into in the ordinary course of business and have been conducted on an arms-length basis. During fiscal 2025, the Company incurred expenses for legal services rendered in excess of $120,000.
Other Agreements
In addition to the indemnification required in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws, we have entered into an indemnification agreement with each member of our board of directors and each of our officers. These agreements provide for the indemnification of our directors and officers for certain expenses and liabilities incurred in connection with any action, suit, proceeding or alternative dispute resolution mechanism, or hearing, inquiry or investigation that may lead to the foregoing, to which they are a party, or are threatened to be made a party, by reason of the fact that they are or were a director, officer, employee, agent or fiduciary of the Company, or any of our subsidiaries, by reason of any action or inaction by them while serving as an officer, director, agent or fiduciary, or by reason of the fact that they were serving at our request as a director, officer, employee, agent or fiduciary of another entity. In the case of an action or proceeding by or in the right of the
| 2025 Proxy Statement | 77 | ||||||
n RELATED PERSON TRANSACTIONS
Company or any of our subsidiaries, no indemnification will be provided for any claim where a court determines that the indemnified party is prohibited from receiving indemnification. We believe that these charter and bylaw provisions and indemnification agreements are necessary to attract and retain qualified persons as directors and officers.
We have entered into employment agreements with certain of our executive officers that, among other things, provide for certain severance and change of control benefits. For a description of employment agreements with our Named Executive Officers, see “Executive Compensation—Employment Arrangements.”
Other than as described above, since August 1, 2024, we have not entered into any transactions, nor are there any currently proposed transactions, between us and a related party where the amount involved exceeds, or would exceed, $120,000, and in which any related person had or will have a direct or indirect material interest.
We believe the terms of the transactions described above were comparable to terms we could have obtained in arm’s-length dealings with unrelated third parties.
Policies and Procedures for Related Party Transactions
We have adopted a formal written policy providing that our executive officers, directors, nominees for election as directors, beneficial owners of more than 5% of any class of our common stock and any member of the immediate family of any of the foregoing persons, is not permitted to enter into a related-party transaction with us without the consent of our audit committee, subject to the exceptions described below.
In approving or rejecting any such proposal, our audit committee is to consider the relevant facts and circumstances available and deemed relevant to our audit committee, including whether the transaction is on terms no less favorable than terms generally available to an unaffiliated third party under the same or similar circumstances, and the extent of the related party’s interest in the transaction. Our audit committee has determined that certain transactions will not require audit committee approval, including certain employment arrangements of executive officers, director compensation, transactions with another company at which a related party’s only relationship is as a non-executive employee, director or beneficial owner of less than 10% of that company’s shares and the aggregate amount involved does not exceed $120,000 in any fiscal year, transactions where a related party’s interest arises solely from the ownership of our common stock and all holders of our common stock received the same benefit on a pro rata basis and transactions available to all employees generally.
78 | 2025 Proxy Statement | | ||||||
Questions and Answers About the Annual Meeting
The information provided in the “question and answer” format below addresses certain frequently asked questions but is not intended to be a summary of all matters contained in this Proxy Statement. Please read the entire Proxy Statement carefully before voting your shares.
Why am I receiving these materials?
Our board of directors is providing these proxy materials to you in connection with our board of directors’ solicitation of proxies for use at Zscaler’s virtual Annual Meeting, which will take place on January 12, 2026. Stockholders are invited to attend the virtual Annual Meeting and are requested to vote on the proposals described in this Proxy Statement.
All stockholders will have the ability to access the proxy materials via the internet, including this Proxy Statement and our Annual Report, as filed with the SEC on September 11, 2025. This Proxy Statement and the Annual Report are available at www.proxyvote.com, as well as on our website at http://ir.zscaler.com in the Financials section of our Investor Relations webpage. The Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders includes information on how to access the proxy materials, how to submit your vote over the internet, by phone or how to request a paper copy of the proxy materials.
What proposals will be voted on at the Annual Meeting?
There are five proposals scheduled to be voted on at the Annual Meeting:
▪The election of three Class II directors to hold office until the 2028 annual meeting of stockholders or until their successors are elected and qualified, subject to their earlier death, resignation or removal;
▪The ratification of the appointment of PwC as our independent registered public accounting firm for our fiscal year ending July 31, 2026;
▪A proposal to approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, the compensation of our Named Executive Officers;
▪A proposal to approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, the frequency of stockholder advisory votes to approve the compensation of our Named Executive Officers; and
▪If properly presented at the Annual Meeting, the Board Declassification Proposal.
At the time this Proxy Statement was mailed, our management and board of directors were not aware of any other matters to be presented at the Annual Meeting.
How does our board of directors recommend that I vote?
Our board of directors recommends that you vote:
▪FOR the election of each of the three directors nominated by our board of directors and named in this Proxy Statement as Class II directors to serve for a three-year term;
| 2025 Proxy Statement | 79 | ||||||
n QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING
▪FOR the ratification of the appointment of PwC as our independent registered public accounting firm for our fiscal year ending July 31, 2026;
▪FOR the approval, on an advisory non-binding basis, of the compensation of our Named Executive Officers, as disclosed in this Proxy Statement;
▪ONE YEAR as the preferred frequency for future stockholder advisory votes to approve the compensation of our Named Executive Officers; and
▪AGAINST the Board Declassification Proposal.
Who is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting?
Holders of our common stock at the close of business on November 14, 2025, the Record Date for the Annual Meeting, or the Record Date, are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting. Each stockholder is entitled to one vote for each share of our common stock held as of the Record Date. As of the Record Date, there were 159,417,968 shares of common stock outstanding and entitled to vote. Stockholders are not permitted to cumulate votes with respect to the election of directors. The shares you are entitled to vote include shares that are (1) held of record directly in your name and (2) held for you as the beneficial owner through a stockbroker, bank or other nominee.
What is the difference between holding shares as a stockholder of record and as a beneficial owner?
Stockholder of Record: Shares Registered in Your Name. If, at the close of business on the Record Date, your shares were registered directly in your name with Equiniti Trust Company, LLC, our transfer agent, then you are considered the stockholder of record with respect to those shares. As the stockholder of record, you have the right to grant your voting proxy directly to the individuals listed on the proxy card or to vote on your own behalf at the Annual Meeting.
Beneficial Owners: Shares Registered in the Name of a Broker, Bank or Other Nominee. If, at the close of business on the Record Date, your shares were held, not in your name, but rather in a stock brokerage account or by a bank or other nominee on your behalf, then you are considered the beneficial owner of shares held in “street name.” As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker, bank or other nominee how to vote your shares by following the voting instructions your broker, bank or other nominee provides. If you do not provide your broker, bank or other nominee with instructions on how to vote your shares, your broker, bank or other nominee may, in its discretion, vote your shares with respect to routine matters but may not vote your shares with respect to any non-routine matters. For additional information, see “What if I do not specify how my shares are to be voted?” below.
Do I have to do anything in advance if I plan to attend the Annual Meeting?
The Annual Meeting will be a completely virtual meeting, which will be conducted via live audio webcast. You are entitled to participate in the Annual Meeting only if you were a holder of our common stock as of the close of business on November 14, 2025 or if you hold a valid proxy for the Annual Meeting.
You will be able to attend the Annual Meeting and submit your questions during the Annual Meeting by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/ZS2026. You also will be able to vote your shares electronically at the Annual Meeting.
To participate in the Annual Meeting, you will need the control number included on your Notice or proxy card. The live audio webcast will begin promptly at 1:00 p.m. Pacific Time on January 12, 2026. We encourage you to access the meeting prior to the start time. Online check-in will begin at 12:45 p.m. Pacific Time, and you should allow ample time for the check-in procedures.
80 | 2025 Proxy Statement | | ||||||
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING n
How can I get help if I have trouble checking in or listening to the meeting online?
If you encounter any difficulties accessing the Annual Meeting during the check-in or meeting time, please call the technical support number that will be posted on the Annual Meeting log-in page.
How do I vote and what are the voting deadlines?
Stockholder of Record: Shares Registered in Your Name. If you are a stockholder of record, you can vote in one of the following ways:
▪You may vote via the internet. To vote via the internet, go to www.proxyvote.com to complete an electronic proxy card. You will be asked to provide the control number from the proxy card you receive. Your vote must be received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on January 11, 2026 to be counted. If you vote via the internet, you do not need to return a proxy card by mail.
▪You may vote by telephone. To vote by telephone, dial toll-free 1-800-690-6903 in the United States and Canada or 1-800-454-8683 from countries outside the United States and Canada and follow the recorded instructions. You will be asked to provide the control number from the proxy card. Your vote must be received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on January 11, 2026 to be counted. If you vote by telephone, you do not need to return a proxy card by mail.
▪You may vote by mail. To vote by mail using the proxy card (if you requested paper copies of the proxy materials to be mailed to you), complete, date and sign the proxy card and return it promptly by mail in the envelope to be provided so that it is received no later than January 11, 2026. The persons named in the proxy card will vote the shares you own in accordance with your instructions on the proxy card you mail. If you return the proxy card, but do not give any instructions on a particular matter to be voted on at the Annual Meeting, the persons named in the proxy card will vote the shares in accordance with the recommendations of our board of directors.
▪You may vote at the Annual Meeting. To vote at the meeting, following the instructions at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/ZS2026 (have your Notice or proxy card in hand when you visit the website).
Beneficial Owners: Shares Registered in the Name of a Broker, Bank or Other Nominee. If you are the beneficial owner of shares held of record by a broker, bank or other nominee, you will receive voting instructions from your broker, bank or other nominee. You must follow the voting instructions provided by your broker, bank or other nominee in order to instruct your broker, bank or other nominee how to vote your shares. The availability of internet and telephone voting options will depend on the voting process of your broker, bank or other nominee.
Can I change my vote or revoke my proxy?
Stockholder of Record: Shares Registered in Your Name. If you are a stockholder of record, you may revoke your proxy or change your proxy instructions at any time before your proxy is voted at the Annual Meeting by:
▪entering a new vote by internet or telephone;
▪signing and returning a new proxy card with a later date;
▪delivering a written revocation to our Secretary at Zscaler, Inc., 120 Holger Way, San Jose, California 95134, by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on January 11, 2026; or
▪following the instructions at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/ZS2026.
| 2025 Proxy Statement | 81 | ||||||
n QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING
Beneficial Owners: Shares Registered in the Name of a Broker, Bank or Other Nominee. If you are the beneficial owner of your shares, you must contact the broker, bank or other nominee holding your shares and follow their instructions to change your vote or revoke your proxy.
What is the effect of giving a proxy?
Proxies are solicited by and on behalf of our board of directors. The persons named in the proxy have been designated as proxy holders by our board of directors. When a proxy is properly dated, executed and returned, the shares represented by the proxy will be voted at the Annual Meeting in accordance with the instructions of the stockholder. If no specific instructions are given; however, the shares will be voted in accordance with the recommendations of our board of directors. If any matters not described in this Proxy Statement are properly presented at the Annual Meeting, the proxy holders will use their own judgment to determine how to vote your shares. If the Annual Meeting is postponed or adjourned, the proxy holders can vote your shares on the new meeting date, unless you have properly revoked your proxy, as described above.
What if I do not specify how my shares are to be voted?
Stockholder of Record: Shares Registered in Your Name. If you are a stockholder of record and you submit a proxy but you do not provide voting instructions, your shares will be voted:
▪FOR the election of each of the three directors nominated by our board of directors and named in this Proxy Statement as Class II directors to serve for a three-year term (Proposal No. 1);
▪FOR the ratification of the appointment of PwC as our independent registered public accounting firm for our fiscal year ending July 31, 2026 (Proposal No. 2);
▪FOR the approval, on an advisory non-binding basis, of the compensation of our Named Executive Officers, as disclosed in this Proxy Statement (Proposal No. 3);
▪ONE YEAR as the preferred frequency for future stockholder advisory non-binding votes to approve the compensation of our Named Executive Officers (Proposal No. 4); and
▪AGAINST the Board Declassification Proposal (Proposal No. 5);
▪in the discretion of the named proxy holders regarding any other matters properly presented for a vote at the Annual Meeting.
Beneficial Owners: Shares Registered in the Name of a Broker, Bank or Other Nominee. If you are a beneficial owner and you do not provide your broker, bank or other nominee that holds your shares with voting instructions, then your broker, bank or other nominee will determine if it has discretion to vote on each matter. Brokers do not have discretion to vote on non-routine matters. In the absence of timely directions, your broker will have discretion to vote your shares on our sole “routine” matter: the proposal to ratify the appointment of PwC as our independent registered public accounting firm for our fiscal year ending July 31, 2026. For additional information regarding broker non-votes, see “What are the effects of abstentions and broker non-votes?” below.
82 | 2025 Proxy Statement | | ||||||
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING n
What are the effects of abstentions and broker non-votes?
An abstention represents a stockholder’s affirmative choice to decline to vote on a proposal. If a stockholder indicates on its proxy card that it wishes to abstain from voting its shares, or if a broker, bank or other nominee holding its customers’ shares of record causes abstentions to be recorded for shares, these shares will be considered present and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. As a result, abstentions will be counted for purposes of determining the presence or absence of a quorum and will also count as votes against a proposal in cases where approval of the proposal requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the voting power of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting (e.g., Proposal No. 2). Abstentions will have no impact on the outcome of Proposal No. 1 as long as a quorum exists.
A broker non-vote occurs when a broker, bank or other nominee holding shares for a beneficial owner does not vote on a particular proposal because the broker, bank or other nominee does not have discretionary voting power with respect to such proposal and has not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner of the shares. Broker non-votes will be counted for purposes of calculating whether a quorum is present at the Annual Meeting but will not be counted for purposes of determining the number of votes cast. Therefore, a broker non-vote will make a quorum more readily attainable but will not otherwise affect the outcome of the vote on any proposal.
What is a quorum?
A quorum is the minimum number of shares required to be present at the Annual Meeting for the meeting to be properly held under our bylaws and Delaware law. The presence (including by proxy) of a majority of the voting power of our common stock issued and outstanding and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting will constitute a quorum at the Annual Meeting. As noted above, as of the Record Date, there were a total of 159,417,968 shares of common stock outstanding, which means that 79,708,985 shares of common stock must be represented at the Annual Meeting to have a quorum. If there is no quorum, the chairperson of the meeting or a majority of the voting power of our common stock present at the Annual Meeting may adjourn the meeting to a later date.
How many votes are needed for approval of each proposal?
▪Proposal No. 1: The election of the Class II directors requires a plurality of the voting power of the shares present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote on the election of the directors to be approved. Plurality means that the three nominees who receive the most FOR votes will be elected. You may (i) vote FOR all nominees, (ii) WITHHOLD your vote as to all nominees, or (iii) vote FOR all nominees except for those specific nominees from whom you WITHHOLD your vote. Any shares not voted FOR a particular nominee (whether as a result of voting withheld or a broker non-vote) will not be counted in such nominee’s favor and will have no effect on the outcome of the election. A vote withheld with respect to the election of any or all nominees will be counted for purposes of determining whether there is a quorum.
▪Proposal No. 2: The ratification of the appointment of PwC requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the voting power of the shares present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote thereon to be approved. You may vote FOR, AGAINST or ABSTAIN. If you ABSTAIN from voting on Proposal No. 2, the abstention will have the same effect as a vote AGAINST the proposal.
▪Proposal No. 3: The approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our Named Executive Officers requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the voting power of the shares present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote thereon to be approved. You may vote FOR, AGAINST or ABSTAIN. If you ABSTAIN from voting on Proposal No. 3, the abstention will have the same effect as a vote AGAINST the proposal. Because this proposal is an advisory vote, the result will not be binding on our board of directors. However, our board of directors values our stockholders’ opinions, and our board of directors and our compensation committee will consider the outcome of the vote when determining the compensation of our Named Executive Officers.
| 2025 Proxy Statement | 83 | ||||||
n QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING
▪Proposal No. 4: The approval, on an advisory basis, of the frequency of future stockholder votes on the compensation of our Named Executive Officers. The frequency receiving the highest number of votes from holders of shares present in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote thereon will be considered the frequency preferred by the stockholders. You may vote for the frequency of future advisory votes on executive compensation to be “ONE YEAR,” “TWO YEARS,” or “THREE YEARS,” or you may “ABSTAIN” with respect to this proposal. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on this proposal. Because this proposal is an advisory vote, the result will not be binding on our board of directors. However, our board of directors values our stockholders’ opinions, and our board of directors and our compensation committee will consider the outcome of the vote when determining how often we should submit to stockholders an advisory vote to approve the compensation of our named executive officers.
▪Proposal No. 5: The approval of the Board Declassification Proposal on a non-binding, advisory basis requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the voting power of the shares present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote thereon to be approved. You may vote FOR, AGAINST or ABSTAIN. If you ABSTAIN from voting on Proposal No. 5, the abstention will have the same effect as a vote AGAINST the proposal. Broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of the vote.
How are proxies solicited for the Annual Meeting and who is paying for such solicitation?
Our board of directors is soliciting proxies for use at the Annual Meeting by means of the proxy materials. We will bear the entire cost of proxy solicitation, including the preparation, assembly, printing, mailing and distribution of the proxy materials. Copies of solicitation materials will also be made available upon request to brokers, banks and other nominees to forward to the beneficial owners of the shares held of record by such brokers, banks or other nominees. The original solicitation of proxies may be supplemented by solicitation by telephone, electronic communication, or other means by our directors, officers, employees or agents. No additional compensation will be paid to these individuals for any such services, although we may reimburse such individuals for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses in connection with such solicitation.
If you choose to access the proxy materials and/or vote over the internet, you are responsible for internet access charges you may incur. If you choose to vote by telephone, you are responsible for telephone charges you may incur.
What does it mean if I received more than one Notice?
If you receive more than one Notice, your shares may be registered in more than one name or in different accounts. Please follow the voting instructions on each Notice to ensure that all of your shares are voted.
Is my vote confidential?
Proxy instructions, ballots and voting tabulations that identify individual stockholders are handled in a manner that protects your voting privacy. Your vote will not be disclosed either within Zscaler or to third parties, except as necessary to meet applicable legal and administrative requirements, to allow for the tabulation of votes and certification of the vote, or to facilitate a successful proxy solicitation.
84 | 2025 Proxy Statement | | ||||||
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING n
I share an address with another stockholder, and we received only one paper copy of the proxy materials. How may I obtain an additional copy of the proxy materials?
We have adopted an SEC-approved procedure called “householding." Under this procedure, we will deliver only one copy of our Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (and for those stockholders that received a paper copy of proxy materials in the mail, one copy of our Annual Report to stockholders and this Proxy Statement) to multiple stockholders who share the same address (if they appear to be members of the same family), unless we have received contrary instructions from an affected stockholder. Stockholders who participate in householding will continue to receive separate proxy cards if they received a paper copy of proxy materials in the mail. This procedure reduces our printing and mailing costs. Upon written or oral request, we will promptly deliver a separate copy of the proxy materials and Annual Report to any stockholder at a shared address to which we delivered a single copy of any of these documents.
To receive a separate copy, or, if you are receiving multiple copies, to request that we only send a single copy of next year’s proxy materials and Annual Report, you may contact us as follows:
Zscaler, Inc.
Attention: Secretary
120 Holger Way
San Jose, California 95134
(408) 533-0288
Attention: Secretary
120 Holger Way
San Jose, California 95134
(408) 533-0288
Stockholders who hold shares in street name may contact their broker, bank or other nominee to request information about householding.
How can I find out the results of the voting at the Annual Meeting?
Preliminary voting results will be announced at the Annual Meeting. In addition, final voting results will be published in a current report on Form 8-K that we expect to file within four business days after the Annual Meeting. If final voting results are not available to us at that time, we intend to file a Form 8-K to publish preliminary results and, within four business days after the final results are known to us, file an amendment to the Form 8-K to publish the final results.
What is the deadline to propose actions for consideration at next year’s annual meeting of stockholders or to nominate individuals to serve as directors?
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS
Stockholders may present proper proposals for inclusion in our Proxy Statement and for consideration at the next Annual Meeting of stockholders by submitting their proposals in writing to our Secretary in a timely manner. For a stockholder proposal to be considered for inclusion in our Proxy Statement for our fiscal 2026 Annual Meeting, our Secretary must receive the written proposal at our principal executive offices not later than July 24, 2026. In addition, stockholder proposals must comply with the requirements of Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act, regarding the inclusion of stockholder proposals in Company-sponsored proxy materials. Stockholder proposals should be addressed to:
Zscaler, Inc.
Attention: Secretary
120 Holger Way
San Jose, California 95134
(408) 533-0288
Attention: Secretary
120 Holger Way
San Jose, California 95134
(408) 533-0288
| 2025 Proxy Statement | 85 | ||||||
n QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING
Our bylaws also establish an advance notice procedure for stockholders who wish to present a proposal before an Annual Meeting of stockholders but do not intend for the proposal to be included in our Proxy Statement. Our bylaws provide that the only business that may be conducted at an Annual Meeting is business that is (i) specified in our proxy materials with respect to such meeting, (ii) otherwise properly brought before the Annual Meeting by or at the direction of our board of directors, or (iii) properly brought before the Annual Meeting by a stockholder of record entitled to vote at the annual meeting who has delivered timely written notice to our Secretary, which notice must contain the information specified in our bylaws. To be timely for our fiscal 2026 Annual Meeting, our Secretary must receive the written notice at our principal executive offices:
▪not earlier than the close of business on September 7, 2026; and
▪not later than the close of business on October 7, 2026.
In the event the date we hold our fiscal 2026 Annual Meeting has been changed by more than 30 days from the first anniversary of the date of the fiscal 2025 Annual Meeting, then notice of a stockholder proposal that is not intended to be included in our Proxy Statement must be received no earlier than the close of business on the 120th day before the fiscal 2026 Annual Meeting and no later than the close of business on the later of the following two dates:
▪the 90th day prior to such annual meeting; or
▪the 10th day following the day on which public announcement of the date of such annual meeting is first made.
If a stockholder who has notified us of his, her or its intention to present a proposal at an annual meeting does not appear to present his, her or its proposal at such annual meeting, we are not required to present the proposal for a vote at such annual meeting.
In addition to satisfying the foregoing requirements under our bylaws, to comply with the universal proxy rules, stockholders who intend to solicit proxies in support of director nominees other than the Company’s nominees must also comply with the additional requirements of Rule 14a-19 under the Exchange Act.
NOMINATION OF DIRECTOR CANDIDATES
You may propose director candidates for consideration by our nominating and corporate governance committee. Any such recommendations should include the nominee’s name and qualifications for membership on our board of directors and should be directed to our Secretary at the address set forth above. For additional information regarding stockholder recommendations for director candidates, see “Board of Directors and Corporate Governance—Stockholder Recommendations for Nominations to the Board of Directors.”
In addition, our bylaws permit stockholders to nominate directors for election at an annual meeting of stockholders. To nominate a director, the stockholder must provide the information required by our bylaws. In addition, the stockholder must give timely notice to our Secretary in accordance with our bylaws, which, in general, require that the notice be received by our Secretary within the time period described above under “Stockholder Proposals” for stockholder proposals that are not intended to be included in a proxy statement.
AVAILABILITY OF BYLAWS
A copy of our bylaws may be obtained by accessing our public filings on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. You may also contact our Secretary at our principal executive office for a copy of the relevant bylaw provisions regarding the requirements for making stockholder proposals and nominating director candidates.
86 | 2025 Proxy Statement | | ||||||
Other Matters
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires that our executive officers and directors, and persons who own more than 10% of our common stock, file reports of ownership and changes of ownership with the SEC. Such directors, executive officers and 10% stockholders are required by SEC regulation to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.
DELINQUENT SECTION 16(a) REPORTS
SEC regulations require us to identify in this Proxy Statement anyone who filed a required report late during the most recent fiscal year. Based on our review of forms we received, or written representations from reporting persons stating that they were not required to file these forms, we believe that during our fiscal year ended July 31, 2025, all Section 16(a) filing requirements were satisfied on a timely basis.
Fiscal Year 2025 Annual Report and SEC Filings
Our financial statements for our fiscal year ended July 31, 2025 are included in our Annual Report filed with the SEC on September 11, 2025 (File No. 001-38413). This Proxy Statement and our Annual Report are posted in the Financial Information section of the Investor Relations webpage at http://ir.zscaler.com and are available from the SEC at its website at www.sec.gov. You may also obtain a copy of our Annual Report without charge by sending a written request to Zscaler, Inc., Attention: Investor Relations, 120 Holger Way, San Jose, California 95134.
Company Website
We maintain a website at www.zscaler.com. Information contained on, or that can be accessed through, our website is not intended to be incorporated by reference into this Proxy Statement, and references to our website address in this Proxy Statement are inactive textual references only.
| 2025 Proxy Statement | 87 | ||||||
Proposals of Stockholders for Fiscal 2026 Annual Meeting
Pursuant to SEC Rule 14a-8, stockholders who wish to present proposals for inclusion in the proxy materials to be distributed in connection with next year’s annual meeting must submit their proposals so that they are received at Zscaler’s principal executive offices no later than July 24, 2026. Pursuant to the rules promulgated by the SEC, simply submitting a proposal does not guarantee that it will be included. In addition, to comply with the universal proxy rules, stockholders who intend to solicit proxies in support of director nominees other than the Company's nominees must deliver notice that sets forth the information required by Rule 14a-19 no later than November 13, 2026.
In order to be properly brought before the fiscal 2026 Annual Meeting of stockholders, a stockholder’s notice of a matter the stockholder wishes to present, or the person or persons the stockholder wishes to nominate as a director, must be delivered to the Secretary of Zscaler at its principal executive offices not less than 45 nor more than 75 days before the first anniversary of the date on which Zscaler first mailed its proxy materials or a notice of availability of proxy materials (whichever is earlier) for the preceding year’s annual meeting. As a result, any notice given by a stockholder pursuant to these provisions of our bylaws must be received no earlier than September 7, 2026, and no later than October 7, 2026, unless our annual meeting date has been changed by more than 30 days from January 12, 2027. In that case, we must receive proposals not earlier than the close of business on the 120th day prior to the date of the fiscal 2026 annual meeting and not later than the close of business on the later of the 90th day prior to the date of the annual meeting or the 10th day following the day on which we first make a public announcement of the date of the meeting.
To be in proper form, a stockholder’s notice must include the specified information concerning the proposal or nominee as described in our bylaws. A stockholder who wishes to submit a proposal or nomination is encouraged to seek independent counsel about our bylaws and SEC requirements. Zscaler will not consider any proposal or nomination that is not timely or otherwise does not meet the bylaws and SEC requirements for submitting a proposal or nomination.
Notices of intention to present proposals at the fiscal 2026 Annual Meeting of stockholders must be addressed to: Secretary, Zscaler, Inc., 120 Holger Way, San Jose, California 95134. We reserve the right to reject, rule out of order or take other appropriate action with respect to any proposal that does not comply with these and other applicable requirements.
The board of directors does not know of any other matters to be presented at the Annual Meeting. If any additional matters are properly presented at the Annual Meeting, the persons named on the enclosed proxy card will have discretion to vote the shares of common stock they represent in accordance with their own judgment on such matters.
It is important that your shares of common stock be represented at the Annual Meeting, regardless of the number of shares that you hold. You are, therefore, urged to vote by telephone, by using the internet or by mail at your earliest convenience, as instructed on the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
San Jose, California
November 21, 2025
November 21, 2025
88 | 2025 Proxy Statement | | ||||||
Appendix A
Non-GAAP Income from Operations (in thousands) and Non-GAAP Operating Margin
| Non-GAAP Income from Operations | Fiscal 2025 | Fiscal 2024 | Fiscal 2023 | Fiscal 2022 | Fiscal 2021 | Fiscal 2020 | |||||||||||||||||
| GAAP loss from operations | $(128,460) | $(121,477) | $(234,623) | $(327,429) | $(207,812) | $(113,956) | |||||||||||||||||
| Add: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Stock-based compensation expense and related payroll taxes | 685,534 | 549,100 | 457,815 | 430,020 | 278,562 | 129,636 | |||||||||||||||||
| Amortization expense of acquired intangible assets | 16,820 | 14,624 | 11,060 | 9,010 | 6,795 | 3,384 | |||||||||||||||||
Restructuring and other charges(1) | 4,921 | — | 6,564 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
| Litigation-related expenses | — | — | — | — | — | 18,356 | |||||||||||||||||
Asset impairment related to facility exit(2) | — | — | — | — | 416 | 746 | |||||||||||||||||
| Acquisition-related expenses | 1,316 | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
| Non-GAAP income from operations | $580,131 | $442,247 | $240,816 | $111,601 | $77,961 | $38,166 | |||||||||||||||||
| GAAP operating margin | (5) | % | (6) | % | (15) | % | (30) | % | (31) | % | (26) | % | |||||||||||
| Non-GAAP operating margin | 22 | % | 20 | % | 15 | % | 10 | % | 12 | % | 9 | % | |||||||||||
(1)In connection with a restructuring plan announced in March 2023, we incurred stock-based compensation expense of approximately $1.0 million, which is included in stock-based compensation expense and related payroll taxes.
(2)Consists of asset impairment charges related to the relocation of our corporate headquarters.
Calculated Billings (in thousands)
| Calculated Billings | Fiscal 2025 | Fiscal 2024 | Fiscal 2023 | Fiscal 2022 | Fiscal 2021 | Fiscal 2020 | |||||||||||||||||
| Revenue | $ | 2,673,115 | $2,167,771 | $1,616,952 | $1,090,946 | $673,100 | $431,269 | ||||||||||||||||
Add: Total deferred revenue, end of period | 2,468,026 | 1,894,974 | 1,439,676 | 1,021,123 | 630,601 | 369,767 | |||||||||||||||||
Less: Total deferred revenue, beginning of period | (1,894,974) | (1,439,676) | (1,021,123) | (630,601) | (369,767) | (251,202) | |||||||||||||||||
| Calculated billings | $ | 3,246,167 | $2,623,069 | $2,035,505 | $1,481,468 | $933,934 | $549,834 | ||||||||||||||||
| 2025 Proxy Statement | A-1 | ||||||
n APPENDIX A
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
We have provided in this Proxy Statement financial information that has not been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (GAAP). We use non-GAAP financial information to evaluate the performance of our ongoing operations, including to set targets for our employee compensation programs, and for internal planning and forecasting purposes. We believe that non-GAAP financial information, when taken collectively, may be helpful to investors because it provides consistency and comparability with past financial performance. However, non-GAAP financial information is presented for supplemental informational purposes only, has limitations as an analytical tool and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for financial information presented in accordance with GAAP.
We define non-GAAP income from operations as GAAP loss from operations excluding stock-based compensation expense and related payroll taxes, amortization expense of acquired intangible assets, restructuring and other charges, certain litigation-related expenses and asset impairment related to facility exit. We define non-GAAP operating margin as non-GAAP income from operations as a percentage of revenue.
Calculated billings is a non-GAAP financial measure that we believe is a key metric to measure our periodic performance. Calculated billings represents our total revenue plus the change in deferred revenue in a period. Calculated billings in any particular period aims to reflect amounts invoiced for subscriptions to access our cloud platform, together with related support services for our new and existing customers. As calculated billings continues to grow in absolute terms, we expect our calculated billings growth rate to trend down over time. We also expect that calculated billings will be affected by seasonality in terms of when we enter into agreements with customers, and the mix of billings in each reporting period.
Investors are encouraged to review the related GAAP financial measures and the reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures to their most directly comparable GAAP financial measures, and not to rely on any single financial measure to evaluate our business.
A-2 | 2025 Proxy Statement | | ||||||
