Compare · AMPS vs ETR
AMPS vs ETR
Side-by-side comparison of Altus Power Inc. (AMPS) and Entergy Corporation (ETR): market cap, price performance, sector, and recent activity on the wire.
Summary
- Both AMPS and ETR operate in Electric Utilities: Central (Utilities), so they compete in similar markets.
- ETR is the larger of the two at $50.21B, about 46.1x AMPS ($1.09B).
- ETR has been more active in the news (15 items in the past 4 weeks vs 1 for AMPS).
- ETR has more recent analyst coverage (25 ratings vs 18 for AMPS).
Altus Power Inc.
Altus Power, Inc. operates as a clean electrification company in the United States. It is involved in the on-site solar generation for commercial, industrial, and public customers; community solar; energy storage; and electric vehicle charging businesses. The company was founded in 2009 and is based in Stamford, Connecticut.
Entergy Corporation
Entergy Corporation, together with its subsidiaries, engages in the production and distribution of electricity in the United States. The company generates electricity through gas/oil, nuclear, coal, hydro, and solar power sources. It operates in two segments, Utility and Entergy Wholesale Commodities. The company's Utility segment generates, transmits, distributes, and sells electric power in portions of Arkansas, Mississippi, Texas, and Louisiana, including the City of New Orleans; and distributes natural gas. Its Entergy Wholesale Commodities segment engages in the ownership, operation, and decommissioning of nuclear power plants located in the northern United States; sale of electric power to wholesale customers; provision of services to other nuclear power plant owners; and owning interests in non-nuclear power plants that sell electric power to wholesale customers. It sells energy to retail power providers, utilities, electric power co-operatives, power trading organizations, and other power generation companies. The company's power plants have approximately 30,000 megawatts (MW) of electric generating capacity, which include 8,000 MW of nuclear power. The company delivers electricity to 3.0 million utility customers in Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas. Entergy Corporation was incorporated in 1949 and is based in New Orleans, Louisiana.
Latest AMPS
- Foss & Company Closes Tax Equity Investment in Altus Power Distributed Solar-Plus-Storage Portfolio
- Altus Power Acquires 47.8 MW Portfolio from Tortoise Capital Advisors, Expanding Market Leading Footprint in New York
- SEC Form 15-12G filed by Altus Power Inc.
- SEC Form EFFECT filed by Altus Power Inc.
- SEC Form EFFECT filed by Altus Power Inc.
- Director Cbre Acquisition Sponsor, Llc converted options into 2,885,853 shares and returned 27,489,897 shares to the company (SEC Form 4)
- Director Peretz Richard N. returned 134,620 shares to the company, closing all direct ownership in the company (SEC Form 4)
- Co-Founder, CEO & President Felton Gregg J disposed of 10,147,384 shares and returned 6,315,318 shares to the company, closing all direct ownership in the company (SEC Form 4)
- Director Shapiro Richard A returned 48,357 shares to the company, closing all direct ownership in the company (SEC Form 4)
- Director Reich Tina returned 59,549 shares to the company, closing all direct ownership in the company (SEC Form 4)
Latest ETR
- Entergy upgraded by Evercore ISI with a new price target
- "Officer" Under Sec. 16 Rules Fisackerly Haley exercised 10,638 shares at a strike of $52.69 and sold $1,170,180 worth of shares (10,638 units at $110.00) as part of a pre-agreed trading plan (SEC Form 4)
- New insider Stack Patrick J Jr claimed ownership of 15,280 shares (SEC Form 3)
- Director Ropp Ralph Lewis was granted 905 shares, increasing direct ownership by 60% to 2,423 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Puckett Karen A was granted 1,079 shares, increasing direct ownership by 3% to 34,223 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Levenick Stuart L was granted 1,079 shares, increasing direct ownership by 2% to 47,209 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Hyland M Elise was granted 1,079 shares, increasing direct ownership by 6% to 19,426 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Frederickson Philip L was granted 1,079 shares, increasing direct ownership by 3% to 33,639 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Ellis Brian W was granted 1,079 shares, increasing direct ownership by 8% to 14,453 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Donald Kirkland H was granted 858 shares, increasing direct ownership by 4% to 24,505 units (SEC Form 4)