Compare · OLED vs VLTO
OLED vs VLTO
Side-by-side comparison of Universal Display Corporation (OLED) and Veralto Corp (VLTO): market cap, price performance, sector, and recent activity on the wire.
Summary
- OLED operates in Technology, while VLTO operates in Industrials - the two are in different parts of the market.
- VLTO is the larger of the two at $23.04B, about 6.1x OLED ($3.75B).
- Over the past year, OLED is down 47.0% and VLTO is down 9.2% - VLTO leads by 37.8 points.
- OLED has been more active in the news (15 items in the past 4 weeks vs 14 for VLTO).
- VLTO has more recent analyst coverage (19 ratings vs 13 for OLED).
- Company
- Universal Display Corporation
- Veralto Corp
- Price
- $80.17+0.63%
- $93.80-0.39%
- Market cap
- $3.75B
- $23.04B
- 1M return
- -10.54%
- +11.66%
- 1Y return
- -47.01%
- -9.23%
- Industry
- Electrical Products
- Electrical Products
- Exchange
- NASDAQ
- NYSE
- IPO
- 2023
- News (4w)
- 15
- 14
- Recent ratings
- 13
- 19
Universal Display Corporation
Universal Display Corporation engages in the research, development, and commercialization of organic light emitting diode (OLED) technologies and materials for use in display and solid-state lighting applications. As of February 18, 2021, it owned, exclusively licenses, or had sole rights to sublicense approximately 5,000 issued and pending patents worldwide. The company licenses and supplies its proprietary UniversalPHOLED materials to display and lighting manufacturers, and others. It is also involved in the research, development, and commercialization of other OLED device and manufacturing technologies, including FOLED that are flexible OLEDs for the fabrication of OLEDs on flexible substrates; OVJP, an organic vapor jet printing technology; thin-film encapsulation technology for the packaging of flexible OLEDs and other thin-film devices, as well as for use as a barrier film for plastic substrates; and UniversalP2OLED, which are printable phosphorescent OLEDs. In addition, the company provides technology development and support services, including third-party collaboration and support to third parties for the commercialization of their OLED products. Further, it provides contract research services in the areas of chemical materials synthesis research, development, and commercialization for non-OLED applications. Universal Display Corporation was founded in 1985 and is headquartered in Ewing, New Jersey.
Latest OLED
- Director Elias Richard C gifted 455 shares and received a gift of 455 shares, decreasing direct ownership by 31% to 1,000 units (SEC Form 4)
- Universal Display Corporation Announces Second Quarter 2026 Earnings Conference Call
- Director Lau Joan was granted 455 shares, increasing direct ownership by 16% to 3,316 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Walker April was granted 455 shares, increasing direct ownership by 25% to 2,281 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Joseph Celia M was granted 455 shares, increasing direct ownership by 5% to 8,863 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Rosenblatt Sidney D was granted 455 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.33% to 137,639 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Comparin Cynthia Jane was granted 455 shares, increasing direct ownership by 5% to 8,863 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Lacerte Lawrence was granted 455 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.38% to 119,463 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Brown Nigel was granted 455 shares, increasing direct ownership by 16% to 3,316 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Gemmill Elizabeth H was granted 455 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.46% to 100,307 units (SEC Form 4)
Latest VLTO
- Director Schwieters John T was granted 1,009 shares, increasing direct ownership by 18% to 6,498 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Williams Thomas was granted 1,009 shares, increasing direct ownership by 43% to 3,380 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Wallis-Lage Cindy L. was granted 1,009 shares, increasing direct ownership by 43% to 3,380 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Sankaran Vijay P. was granted 1,009 shares, increasing direct ownership by 61% to 2,669 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Mitts Heath A was granted 1,009 shares, increasing direct ownership by 41% to 3,500 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Lohr Walter G was granted 1,009 shares, increasing direct ownership by 43% to 3,380 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director King William was granted 1,009 shares, increasing direct ownership by 12% to 9,557 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Kambeyanda Shyam was granted 1,099 shares, increasing direct ownership by 46% to 3,470 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Comas Daniel L was granted 1,099 shares, increasing direct ownership by 6% to 18,509 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Colpron Francoise was granted 1,099 shares, increasing direct ownership by 46% to 3,470 units (SEC Form 4)