Compare · OXY vs WPX
OXY vs WPX
Side-by-side comparison of Occidental Petroleum Corporation (OXY) and WPX Energy, Inc. (WPX): market cap, price performance, sector, and recent activity on the wire.
Summary
- Both OXY and WPX operate in Oil & Gas Production (Energy), so they compete in similar markets.
- OXY carries a market cap of $59.32B.
- OXY has hit the wire 3 times in the past 4 weeks while WPX has been quiet.
- OXY has more recent analyst coverage (25 ratings vs 0 for WPX).
Occidental Petroleum Corporation
Occidental Petroleum Corporation, together with its subsidiaries, engages in the acquisition, exploration, and development of oil and gas properties in the United States, the Middle East, Africa, and Latin America. The company operates through three segments: Oil and Gas, Chemical, and Marketing and Midstream. The company's Oil and Gas segment explores for, develops, and produces oil and condensate, natural gas liquids (NGLs), and natural gas. Its Chemical segment manufactures and markets basic chemicals, including chlorine, caustic soda, chlorinated organics, potassium chemicals, ethylene dichloride, chlorinated isocyanurates, sodium silicates, and calcium chloride; vinyls comprising vinyl chloride monomer, polyvinyl chloride, and ethylene. The company's Midstream and Marketing segment gathers, processes, transports, stores, purchases, and markets oil, condensate, NGLs, natural gas, carbon dioxide, and power. This segment also trades around its assets consisting of transportation and storage capacity; and invests in entities. Occidental Petroleum Corporation was founded in 1920 and is headquartered in Houston, Texas.
Latest OXY
- Occidental Petro upgraded by Barclays with a new price target
- Occidental Petro upgraded by Goldman with a new price target
- Amendment: SEC Form SCHEDULE 13G/A filed by Occidental Petroleum Corporation
- Director Moore Jack B was granted 6,720 shares and covered exercise/tax liability with 1,479 shares, increasing direct ownership by 7% to 76,431 units (SEC Form 4) to cover withholding tax
- Director Bailey Vicky A covered exercise/tax liability with 1,223 shares and was granted 3,734 shares, increasing direct ownership by 19% to 15,490 units (SEC Form 4) (for tax liability)
- Director Robinson Kenneth B. was granted 4,149 shares and covered exercise/tax liability with 913 shares, increasing direct ownership by 27% to 15,359 units (SEC Form 4) to cover taxes
- Director Gould Andrew was granted 4,978 shares and covered exercise/tax liability with 1,494 shares, increasing direct ownership by 8% to 46,334 units (SEC Form 4) (tax withholding)
- Director Gutierrez Carlos M was granted 3,734 shares, increasing direct ownership by 5% to 82,651 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Klesse William R was granted 4,149 shares and covered exercise/tax liability with 913 shares, increasing direct ownership by 1% to 222,149 units (SEC Form 4) to satisfy withholding obligation
- Director Poladian Avedick Baruyr was granted 4,149 shares, increasing direct ownership by 6% to 79,575 units (SEC Form 4)