Compare · AREC vs BTU
AREC vs BTU
Side-by-side comparison of American Resources Corporation (AREC) and Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU): market cap, price performance, sector, and recent activity on the wire.
Summary
- Both AREC and BTU operate in Coal Mining (Energy), so they compete in similar markets.
- BTU is the larger of the two at $2.93B, about 22.8x AREC ($128.4M).
- AREC has been more active in the news (7 items in the past 4 weeks vs 2 for BTU).
- BTU has more recent analyst coverage (8 ratings vs 5 for AREC).
American Resources Corporation
American Resources Corporation supplies raw materials for the global infrastructure marketplace. The company offers metallurgical coal and coal used in pulverized coal injection that are essential building blocks in the steel manufacturing process. It has a portfolio of operations located in the Central Appalachian basin of eastern Kentucky and southern West Virginia. The company was founded in 2006 and is headquartered in Fishers, Indiana.
Peabody Energy Corporation
Peabody Energy Corporation engages in coal mining business in the United States, Japan, Taiwan, Australia, China, India, Vietnam, South Korea, and internationally. The company operates through Seaborne Thermal Mining, Seaborne Metallurgical Mining, Powder River Basin Mining, and Other U.S. Thermal Mining segments. It is involved in mining, preparation, and sale of thermal coal primarily to electric utilities; mining bituminous and sub-bituminous coal deposits; and mining metallurgical coal, such as hard coking coal, semi-hard coking coal, semi-soft coking coal, and pulverized coal injection coal. The company supplies coal primarily to electricity generators, industrial facilities, and steel manufacturers. As of December 31, 2020, it owned interests in 17 coal mining operations located in the United States and Australia; and had approximately 3.0 billion tons of proven and probable coal reserves and approximately 450,000 acres of surface property through ownership and lease agreements. The company also engages in direct and brokered trading of coal and freight-related contracts, as well as provides transportation-related services, which involve financial derivative contracts and physical contracts. Peabody Energy Corporation was founded in 1883 and is headquartered in St. Louis, Missouri.
Latest AREC
- American Resources Corporation Appoints Datuk Wira Mark Ling as CEO of Newly Formed American Resources Indo Pacific to Lead Rare Earth Supply Chain Development in Malaysia
- SEC Form 8-K filed by American Resources Corporation
- SEC Form 8-K filed by American Resources Corporation
- American Resources Corporation, ReElement Technologies and Electrified Materials Announce October Conference Participation
- AstraBit Adds Institutional Markets and Digital-Asset Leaders Lisa Wade and Josh Hawes to its Advisory Board
- ReElement Technologies to Hold Meetings in New York During Climate Week and UN General Assembly
- American Resources Corporation's Electrified Materials Signs Binding LOI to Acquire Blackion, Expanding Critical Materials and Battery Supply Chain Platform
- American Resources Corporation, ReElement Technologies and Electrified Materials Announce September Conference Participation
- American Resources Corporation Joins Critical Minerals Institute as its First Platinum Member
- American Resources Corporation filed SEC Form 8-K: Notice of Delisting or Failure to Satisfy a Continued Listing Rule or Standard; Transfer of Listing, Financial Statements and Exhibits
Latest BTU
- SEC Form 8-K filed by Peabody Energy Corporation
- SEC Form SD filed by Peabody Energy Corporation
- Peabody Announces Full Redemption of 3.250% Convertible Senior Notes due 2028
- Peabody Energy Corporation filed SEC Form 8-K: Regulation FD Disclosure, Financial Statements and Exhibits
- Director Champion William H was granted 101 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.23% to 43,304 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Malone Robert A was granted 52 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.09% to 58,692 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Walker Clayton D. was granted 23 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.29% to 7,927 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Gorman Stephen E was granted 51 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.09% to 57,720 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Hodges Georganne was granted 22 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.27% to 8,064 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Chirekos Nicholas J. was granted 53 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.12% to 44,672 units (SEC Form 4)