Compare · EOG vs WHK
EOG vs WHK
Side-by-side comparison of EOG Resources Inc. (EOG) and WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (WHK): market cap, price performance, sector, and recent activity on the wire.
Summary
- Both EOG and WHK operate in Oil & Gas Production (Energy), so they compete in similar markets.
- EOG is the larger of the two at $77.17B, about 103.4x WHK ($746.3M).
- EOG has been more active in the news (12 items in the past 4 weeks vs 3 for WHK).
- EOG has more recent analyst coverage (25 ratings vs 0 for WHK).
EOG Resources Inc.
EOG Resources, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, explores for, develops, produces, and markets crude oil, and natural gas and natural gas liquids. Its principal producing areas are in New Mexico and Texas in the United States; the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago; the People's Republic of China; and the Sultanate of Oman. As of December 31, 2020, it had total estimated net proved reserves of 3,220 million barrels of oil equivalent, including 1,514 million barrels (MMBbl) of crude oil and condensate reserves; 813 MMBbl of natural gas liquid reserves; and 5,360 billion cubic feet of natural gas reserves. The company was formerly known as Enron Oil & Gas Company. EOG Resources, Inc. was incorporated in 1985 and is headquartered in Houston, Texas.
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp
WhiteHawk Minerals is focused on acquiring and managing high-quality natural gas mineral and royalty interests in premier U.S. basins, with a portfolio concentrated in the Appalachian and Haynesville Basins. As of September 30, 2026, the Company's portfolio spanned approximately 3.6 million gross acres.
Latest EOG
- SEC Form 10-Q filed by EOG Resources Inc.
- EOG Resources Inc. filed SEC Form 8-K: Results of Operations and Financial Condition, Regulation FD Disclosure, Financial Statements and Exhibits
- EOG Resources Reports Third Quarter 2026 Results and Raises Regular Dividend 8%
- Chairman & CEO Yacob Ezra Y was granted 2 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.00% to 268,450 units (SEC Form 4)
- EVP & COO Leitzell Jeffrey R. was granted 4 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.00% to 90,794 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Kerr Michael T. was granted 330 shares, increasing direct ownership by 1% to 23,626 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Gaut C Christopher was granted 130 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.56% to 23,192 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Dugle Lynn A was granted 38 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.49% to 7,734 units (SEC Form 4)
- EVP & Chief Legal Officer Donaldson Michael P was granted 134 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.12% to 107,433 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Daniels Robert P was granted 404 shares, increasing direct ownership by 1% to 35,602 units (SEC Form 4)