Compare · EOG vs ESTE
EOG vs ESTE
Side-by-side comparison of EOG Resources Inc. (EOG) and Earthstone Energy Inc. (ESTE): market cap, price performance, sector, and recent activity on the wire.
Summary
- Both EOG and ESTE operate in Oil & Gas Production (Energy), so they compete in similar markets.
- EOG is the larger of the two at $71.04B, about 100.3x ESTE ($708.5M).
- EOG has hit the wire 14 times in the past 4 weeks while ESTE has been quiet.
- EOG has more recent analyst coverage (25 ratings vs 11 for ESTE).
EOG Resources Inc.
EOG Resources, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, explores for, develops, produces, and markets crude oil, and natural gas and natural gas liquids. Its principal producing areas are in New Mexico and Texas in the United States; the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago; the People's Republic of China; and the Sultanate of Oman. As of December 31, 2020, it had total estimated net proved reserves of 3,220 million barrels of oil equivalent, including 1,514 million barrels (MMBbl) of crude oil and condensate reserves; 813 MMBbl of natural gas liquid reserves; and 5,360 billion cubic feet of natural gas reserves. The company was formerly known as Enron Oil & Gas Company. EOG Resources, Inc. was incorporated in 1985 and is headquartered in Houston, Texas.
Earthstone Energy Inc.
Earthstone Energy, Inc., an independent oil and gas company, engages in the acquisition, exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas properties in the United States. The company's asset portfolio includes the Midland Basin of west Texas and the Eagle Ford trend of south Texas. As of December 31, 2020, it operated 103 gross Eagle Ford wells; and 12 gross Austin Chalk wells, as well as had 78,875 thousand barrels of oil equivalent (MBOE) of total proved reserves comprised 38,298 MBOE of proved developed reserves and 40,577 MBOE of proved undeveloped reserves. The company was incorporated in 1969 and is headquartered in The Woodlands, Texas.
Latest EOG
- Director Daniels Robert P was granted 57 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.16% to 34,752 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Kerr Michael T. was granted 57 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.25% to 22,931 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Dugle Lynn A was granted 57 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.75% to 7,654 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Crisp Charles R sold $256,953 worth of shares (1,887 units at $136.17), decreasing direct ownership by 3% to 63,160 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Chandler John D was granted 1,541 shares, increasing direct ownership by 187% to 2,367 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Daniels Robert P was granted 1,541 shares, increasing direct ownership by 5% to 34,695 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Clark Janet F was granted 1,541 shares, increasing direct ownership by 3% to 49,241 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Crisp Charles R was granted 1,541 shares, increasing direct ownership by 2% to 65,047 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Robertson Julie J was granted 1,541 shares, increasing direct ownership by 10% to 17,150 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Dugle Lynn A was granted 1,541 shares, increasing direct ownership by 25% to 7,597 units (SEC Form 4)
Latest ESTE
- SEC Form SC 13G/A filed by Earthstone Energy Inc. (Amendment)
- SEC Form 15-12G filed by Earthstone Energy Inc.
- SEC Form EFFECT filed by Earthstone Energy Inc.
- SEC Form EFFECT filed by Earthstone Energy Inc.
- SEC Form EFFECT filed by Earthstone Energy Inc.
- SEC Form EFFECT filed by Earthstone Energy Inc.
- SEC Form EFFECT filed by Earthstone Energy Inc.
- SEC Form EFFECT filed by Earthstone Energy Inc.
- SEC Form EFFECT filed by Earthstone Energy Inc.
- SEC Form EFFECT filed by Earthstone Energy Inc.