Compare · OIO vs WM
OIO vs WM
Side-by-side comparison of OIO Group (OIO) and Waste Management Inc. (WM): market cap, price performance, sector, and recent activity on the wire.
Summary
- Both OIO and WM operate in Environmental Services (Utilities), so they compete in similar markets.
- WM is the larger of the two at $95.88B, about 139.1x OIO ($689.1M).
- Over the past year, OIO is down 77.1% and WM is up 4.0% - WM leads by 81.0 points.
- OIO has been more active in the news (2 items in the past 4 weeks vs 1 for WM).
- WM has more recent analyst coverage (25 ratings vs 0 for OIO).
Waste Management Inc.
Waste Management, Inc., through its subsidiaries, provides waste management environmental services to residential, commercial, industrial, and municipal customers in North America. It offers collection services, including picking up and transporting waste and recyclable materials from where it was generated to a transfer station, material recovery facility (MRF), or disposal site; and owns, develops, and operates landfill gas-to-energy facilities in the United States, as well as owns and operates transfer stations. As of December 31, 2020, the company owned or operated 263 solid waste landfills; 5 secure hazardous waste landfills; 103 MRFs; and 348 transfer stations. It also provides materials processing and commodities recycling services; recycling brokerage services, such as managing the marketing of recyclable materials for third parties; and other strategic business solutions. In addition, the company offers construction and remediation services; services related with the disposal of fly ash, and residue generated from the combustion of coal and other fuel stocks; in-plant services comprising full-service waste management solutions and consulting services; and specialized disposal services for oil and gas exploration and production operations. The company was formerly known as USA Waste Services, Inc. and changed its name to Waste Management, Inc. in 1998. Waste Management, Inc. was incorporated in 1987 and is headquartered in Houston, Texas.
Latest OIO
- De Tomaso Advances Next-Generation V12 Programme with Italtecnica
- SEC Form 6-K filed by OIO Group
- New insider Choi Sung Fung (Norman) claimed ownership of 235,130,275 units of Ordinary Shares (SEC Form 3)
- SEC Form 3 filed by new insider Yow Su Chin
- New insider Wong Jason Yuk Lun claimed ownership of 667 units of Ordinary Shares (SEC Form 3)
- New insider Majcher En Ti Diana claimed ownership of 667 units of Ordinary Shares (SEC Form 3)
- New insider Jodlowski Jakub claimed ownership of 667 units of Ordinary Shares (SEC Form 3)
- New insider Hamilton Jacob William Anthony claimed ownership of 667 units of Ordinary Shares (SEC Form 3)
- SEC Form 3 filed by new insider Chong Yao Xuan James
- OIO Group Enters into Term Sheet for Proposed Strategic Acquisition of German Specialist Automotive Engineering and Production Platform
Latest WM
- AM Best Affirms Credit Ratings of National Guaranty Insurance Company of Vermont
- WM Sets Date for Second Quarter 2026 Earnings Conference Call
- SEC Form 11-K filed by Waste Management Inc.
- WM Updates Recycle Right® Rules: No Batteries in Recycling or Trash
- SVP of Enterprise Strategy Carrasco Rafael exercised 2,655 shares at a strike of $126.00 and sold $585,335 worth of shares (2,655 units at $220.46), increasing direct ownership by 0.00% to 15,540 units (SEC Form 4)
- SVP Bus Optimiz & Collection Dalby Marcel was granted 2,257 shares, increasing direct ownership by 63% to 5,867 units (SEC Form 4)
- EVP & Chief Operating Officer Hemmer Tara J. was granted 2,544 shares, increasing direct ownership by 3% to 81,462 units (SEC Form 4)
- President Morris John J covered exercise/tax liability with 566 shares, decreasing direct ownership by 0.57% to 99,363 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Plummer William B was granted 861 shares (SEC Form 4)
- Director Sylvester Maryrose was granted 861 shares, increasing direct ownership by 17% to 5,865 units (SEC Form 4)